Gufic Biosciences Limited (509079) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 17, 2025

BSE IN Health Care Pharmaceuticals earnings 56 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the Gufic Biosciences Limited Q2 FY 2025-'26 Investor Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Ms. Shweta Shetty. Thank you, and over to you, ma'am.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#2

Good afternoon, everyone. I welcome you all to Gufic Biosciences Limited Earnings Conference Call for the second quarter of financial year '25-'26. We have with us today for the call, Mr. Pranav Choksi, CEO and Whole-Time Director; Mr. Devkinandan Roonghta, CFO; and Mr. Avik Das from Investor Relations team to give the highlights of the business and financial performance of the company and to take questions, if any. Before we begin, I would like to say that some of the statements that will be made in today's discussion may include certain forward-looking statements, which are projections or estimates about future events. This estimate reflects management's current expectations about future performance of the company. This estimate involves a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what is expressed or implied. Gufic does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether because of new confirmation, future events or otherwise. I hope you have received the investor presentation that we have posted on our website. I will now hand over the call to Mr. Avik for sharing the business highlights. Over to you, Avik.

Avik Das

executive
#3

Thank you, Shweta Shetty, and good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining. I'll provide a focused update on the direction and what is changing inside the business units. I'll start with our hospital injectables platforms, which include Criti Care and Sparsh. Our approach -- in Critical Care, our approach remains hospital-first and science-led. We are concentrating resources where protocols drive repeat use, such as sepsis-resistant infection and invasive fungal diseases. The intent is to win depth in the existing accounts, embed our therapies and care pathways and let molecules class compound share. Portfolio additions are chosen to strengthen our AMR stewardship and reduce escalations for the use of last-line drugs. On Sparsh, Sparsh is being shaped as a platform for offering niche products to a wider segment of hospitals and nursing homes where service reliability matters as much as the brand. Our medium-term focus areas are contrast media, parenteral nutrition and Cardiac Critical Care. In this division, we are tightening our execution levers, which include coverage, distribution control and increases in hospital rate contracts. So when contrast media and TPN go live, we scale within our existing accounts, and we don't have to go out looking for greenfield accounts. Moving to our women's health platform, which includes Ferticare and Zenova, Ferticare's path is category creation in advanced fertility, particularly in the reproductive immunology. The first-to-market immune therapy for recurrent implantation failure is about solving a very difficult clinical problem and earning specialist trust there and adoption here will be steady and not spiky. Our brands -- on brands, our working guardrails have remained unchanged as we have indicated in the previous quarter. Puregraf is trending towards a INR 25 crore annual run rate. Supergraf is on a 2-year path to a INR 15 crore brand. Guficin Alpha is well headed towards a INR 10 crore brand and Cetrocare is positioned to be the top choice in the antagonist class. The objective is a coherent basket that captures more of the IVF journey and not to have a long tail of just SKUs. Now on Zenova, Zenova is a stable specialty platform in women's health and ortho. We are building preference at the point of care and balancing the mix with differentiated launches. The near-term job even here is execution, quality, which is consistent prescription depth and very disciplined brand rollout. So growth here is durable rather than promotion driven. Now moving to our toxin platform, which has Aesthaderm and Neurocare. On the Aesthaderm front, we are extending from a toxin anchor into a fuller aesthetic ecosystem, which will include fillers, skin boosters and bistimulators. We intend to do this without diluting our focus on toxins. The logic is very simple. A broader portfolio enlarges the clinician funnel and creates a progression path into toxin over time. We've advanced our in-licensing for global quality fillers and biostimulators. We are building a scalable practitioner training engine so launches convert efficiently here. Now on the Neurocare front, which is our therapeutic toxin, the strategy is a long cycle but high lifetime value, which is create new injectors, widen indications where guidelines already support use and expand specialty coverage beyond neurology. This is methodical market making, which is covering training, evidence creation and awareness building so that usage is repeatable and protocols within. Now moving to our last platform here, which is a nutraceutical platform, where health care division operates. This particular division blends modern evidence-based ayurveda with musculoskeletal care. Our flagship over here is Sallaki, which is positioned as a care pathway rather than a symptomatic fill. Ridol continues to build relevance in the acute GI segment. We are adding selectively here. We've added molecules such as Vonoprazan and other molecules where science and prescriber behavior are shifting in order to keep the portfolio focused and relevant to the market trends. So that wraps up our domestic branded formulations business. I'll move to our international business update. Our international business continues to progress as planned with focus on strengthening our global partnering model and expanding regulatory reach. During the first half of the year Gufic Ireland secured its first marketing authorization in EU. This gives us direct access to regulated markets, an important milestone that establishes a platform for future filings. We also received 24 key product and facility approvals across regulated and emerging markets, including markets such as South Africa, Colombia, Portugal, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Thailand and Lithuania. These approvals enhance our footprint across critical care, gastro and anti-infective portfolios. Now on the broader opportunity, which we had indicated in the last quarter, the combined addressable market for our priority molecules stands at about $800 million across identified countries. We are finalizing the sequence and timeline for market entry based on local intelligence have begun and we have begun the filing of dossiers across multiple geographies. The partnering model remains strong with continued engagement from leading global health organizations and regional partners. This is enabling us to scale our complex injectable portfolio internationally in a disciplined and compliance-led manner. Now on the last part, I'll give you a quick update on the Indore facility as well. So the facility continues to progress as per plan. Over the past quarter, the focus has remained on steady scale-up. Tech transfers have now been completed for 40 products and an additional 27 are under development and stability testing, expanding the base of both lyophilized and liquid injectable offerings. Vendor audits by more Indian pharma partners continue and with multiple new audits scheduled through the second half of FY '26. Our global audit timelines remain unchanged with EU GMP and U.K. MHRA targeted for latest by Q1 of FY '27 and the U.S. FDA milestone to follow client-triggered time lines thereafter. Operationally, the plant is on track to achieve its utilization and EBITDA target for FY '26, and we maintain our guidance of Indore becoming margin accretive by FY '27 onwards. Overall, the project remains aligned with our road map and is scaling in a disciplined, compliance-first manner. With that, I hand over the call to Mr. Roonghta, our CFO, for the financial update. Thank you.

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#4

Thank you, Avik. I'm going to give the financial highlights of Q2 of '25-'26 versus Q1 of '25-'26 because Q2 of '24, '25 versus Q2 of '25-'26 is not comparable because Q2 '24-'25 do not include the Indore plant because Indore plant was started from January 2026. Likewise, the half yearly result of H1 of '25-'26 is not comparable with H1 of '24-'25. Therefore, I'm highlighting the results of Q2 of '25-'26 versus the Q1 of '25-'26. Total revenue for Q2 is INR 230 crores compared to Q1 of '25-'26 is INR 227 crores. EBITDA for the Q2 is INR 37.9 crores compared to Q1 of INR 33.2 crores. EBITDA margin has improved to 16.45% compared to 14.63% in Q1. The profit before tax has been increased to INR 20.5 crores compared to Q1 of INR 16.3% (sic) [ 16.3 crore ]. The PBT margin has further improved to 8.9% compared to Q1 of 7.18%. The profit before tax (sic) [ profit before tax ] for Q2 is INR 14.9 crores compared to Q1 of INR 12.1 crores. PAT margin has further improved in Q2 6.47% versus Q1 of 5.32%. Thank you very much.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#5

Bhoomika, we can start the Q&A session.

Operator

operator
#6

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Nitin Gosar from Bank of India Mutual Fund.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#7

One thing which I think would want to point out in PPT that you guys give out, I think somewhere we need to also start putting in numbers in terms of revenue share because that graphical representation is not giving us optically every quarter how things are shaping up. So if you intend to disclose data, I would say, request you guys do put in efforts to also disclose the numerical numbers so that life becomes easy for us to track your company. Coming to the question, sir, I would like to understand over the last first half, things have progressed on the revenue part. But when it comes to gross margin, we have shown a good improvement. However, the employee expenses and the other expenditures have been constantly going up. Could you help us understand what has changed in last 4 quarters where the costs have been going up. But on the sales mix part, definitely, things are improving, hence, the gross margins have improved. So if you could reflect back what has happened in the last 4 quarters and as we stand today, would this be the true desirable gross margin that our business can showcase with the current sales mix or there is any one-off?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#8

Yes. So I think -- Pranav here. I'll take the question. And I think, Roonghta sir, I'll just request you to come in, in terms of the margins going forward. So just to understand, sir, about your question, so you say, would you like us to give a breakup of Indore and Navsari individually? Or would it be more preferred for you in terms of the 4 SBUs, strategic business units only?

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#9

Strategic business unit will help because eventually, both the plants will start to run at optimal levels, while our business strength relies on -- or the inherent strength is between the different SBUs. So I think if -- going forward, if you can give a breakdown of how the SBUs have done on numbers, that will help our situation because then we'll be able to closely monitor how things are progressing. Otherwise, we'll be -- indicatively, we'll be close, but we'll still not be sure how things are progressing.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#10

And I think you're right. I think mostly we discussed it during the investor call. But if it's in the form of a PowerPoint representation, it will really be help to track that on a Q-to-Q basis. Fine. So we got that message. So I'll ask my team also to work on that. Coming to your question specifically, yes, as we had mentioned in the earlier few times also about the Indore plant finally contributing in terms of declogging the backlog of orders. that is one of the reasons why you see the revenue going up. So I'll just tell you the reason for the revenue and the gross margin, then I'll come to the employee cost specifically. And also, if you're not asked, but the other expenses also would be part of the mine. So I would just talk about that also in general, just to give everyone a perspective. So the revenue would be because of the de-clogging. October 2024 onwards is when the Indore plant commercially started raising invoices. I think December was the month when the first invoice was raised, and that's why you see the capitalization stop from Q4 on a whole. and others were there. Now in specifically regard to the margins increasing is because we also have in this first 6 months, gone a little bit more higher in the international business. And I think that is something which again answers your question. If we gave you that breakup of how the international business has a little bit moved up as compared to the other sectors, that would give you an understanding of how the margins would go up and also continue to go up in the next few quarters also. Domestic business is also growing. CMO business has a little bit, I would say, suffered in these 6 months because most of the capacity which was available we are mostly focusing on exports, and we have already requested most of our CMO partners to shift to Indore. But this is a long-drawn process because of audits involved as well as also validation batches and 3 batch data. They wait for at least 6 months of stability. And then every company has their own, I would say, requirements in terms of QA and then they transition to the new facility. But we hope that the CMO business also would start picking up from Q3 onwards. And we would see a wholesome, I would say, revenue to be captured hopefully by Q4 or maximum by Q1 2027. Coming to the employee cost, as you know, you must have seen the announcements in the last, I would say, 3 quarters in terms of getting Dr. Rajeev Agarwal or we got Vijay Kumar from Galderma or Dr Rajeev Agarwal from [ BSV ] or we had Dr. Rajasekar from International Business. He joined me back also in end of Q4 last year. Q1 was when he was full-fledged this year. And then also followed by Mr. Rajesh Kaul, who joined in Q2 this year. So there have been some -- in case of domestic business as well as international business, some recruitments and additions done. I'm just highlighting the top people -- and along them also the team has been structured by which we have got some additions coming, which will, of course -- they will already have started contribute, but you will see the add-ons happening in the quarters to come in terms of the regulatory, in terms of the market penetration, in terms of business intelligence and so on and so forth. And also with the regulatory department also being a little bit more expanded, keeping in mind the demands of Indore. So that's why there have been some products which have been, I would say, validated for the Indian market, where there are some Phase IIIs going or maybe there are some validation batches and testing going on or bioequalence being done for certain products, which we are going to launch in the next year as well as some clinical data being worked on some complex injectables. And that's the reason other expenses also have a little bit gone up in terms of R&D as well as those here. And employee, like I mentioned, because of these restructurings and addition of team members, this is what has happened. Plus the area also, of course, is one of the point. But again, I'll hand it over to Roonghta. Maybe he can elaborate in a little more specific manner. So Rota sir, please take it forward.

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#11

Basically, if you see the employee expenses has been gone up because of the Indore plant, we have to incur approximately INR 4.5 crores per quarter salary. And that is one of the reasons the employee expenses has been gone up approximately high because INR 9 crores is the extra employee expenses in the Q2 of current year compared to Q2 of last year. Other than this, there is annual increment has been given to the employees. That is another one of the reasons for increasing the employee expenses. The finance cost has been gone up because of the capitalization. Previously, the interest was capitalized in Q2 of the last year, whereas the current quarter, the interest has been charged to the P&L. Similarly, the depreciation has been increased because -- only because of the Indore. Interest is also increased because of the Indore. Other expenses has been increased because of the Indore also because there is an electricity bill, there is a consumable consumption and there is a fuel expenses. All these expenses are also contributing because of the Indore because including interest, depreciation, employee cost and other expenses, around INR 18 crores per quarter we are incurring for Indore expenses.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#12

Got it. This is very clear, sir. This is very helpful. Apart from this, I just wanted to understand on the domestic part, how this business is scaling up because you don't have the past track record of how the how the quarterly numbers have shaped up. So any heads up how first half the domestic growth would have been and same for the international business?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#13

Yes. So international business, of course, is growing in almost by, I think, 32% to 33%. That is also a reason because of some tenders from the U.K. market as well as some new markets also opened up like Canada and SouthAfrica and Brazil. And in terms of the domestic market, specifically, the infertility division has really taken steam with the Puregraf and the immunocinal -- or the Guficin Alpha along with even Supergraf, which was launched. So the infertility division is one of the growth, I would say, players. The Critical Care as well as Sparsh, I think, are growing at around 8% to 10%, but that is in spite of -- that is the value growth. But the main issue would be, of course, the erosion of units -- I'm sorry, the units are growing much higher, but the value is being eroded. So you see a net of around 4% to 6% only coming there because there has been some erosions in pricing. So it's not the margins getting affected, but the top line being affected because there's an overall price downward trends of the API, which has to be passed on to the market. But that's not that major. Like I said, because of the capacity priorities, the CMO has definitely taken a dip in the first 6 months. But again, coming back to the domestic market, the health care business and Zenova are in that 10% to 15% trajectory. This Ferticare is a little bit on a higher 18% and the domestic Ferticare -- I mean, Critical Care and Sparsh would be around 5% to 6%. Actually, before we go to the next question, I forgot -- I just got a nut from my colleague. We forgot to mention the botulinum toxin part of the business and the botulinum toxin business is also growing at around 22% for both that is, neuro as well as aesthetics. So that completes the domestic basket. So that's it. Sorry, let's proceed to the next question. Sorry, I just had to add that.

Operator

operator
#14

The next question comes from the line of Bhavya Sonawala from Samaasa Capital.

Bhavya Sonawala

analyst
#15

Am I audible?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#16

Yes. Please go ahead.

Bhavya Sonawala

analyst
#17

Yes. Just 2 questions. So last call, you had kind of spoken about how we were in talks with some U.S. brands for in-licensing of Stunnox. Has there been any update on that? Are we still in talks?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#18

Yes. So like I think that was around 2 quarters ago. Last quarter already, I also clarified that we had received a commercial offer, which we found not worth pursuing in terms of the bandwidth, which we had to employ in terms of setting up a separate entity only for the regulated markets. So talks are still on. But like I said, for us, the priority right now would be to completely scale up Indore, because as you understand if tomorrow, even if the money comes in from someone else, the entire bandwidth to create a new facility, again, would put us into some sort of a capital investment for the next 2 years and my team would be engaged. So the priority right now as a conscious call between the CFO, myself and the team that we have Indore, we have the dual chamber bag, we have botulinum toxin. Let's go for, I would say, focus on these 3 things, which are already available with us, get the debt off the books, go for a top line and increase the margins. Also, there will be a sort of a GLP-1 contract manufacturing opportunity also where we'll be putting in some money, which is anyway ongoing since the last few months. So let's focus on all this where our, I would say, bandwidth is already there, and we already have our hand in the field. And then maybe after a year or after 2 years, if that opportunity comes up, we can explore it.

Bhavya Sonawala

analyst
#19

Understood. So these other opportunities like GLP you spoke about that the timeline would be another few quarters to get some solid kind of business coming in?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#20

So the GLP-1 is a pure CMO model with Hetero, which is there and one more company, but mostly with Hetero, where we are going to take the brand like remdesivir, as you all are aware, with Gufic had tied up with Hetero for the front ending. Similarly, here, we are purely looking at a CMO role for Hetero for semaglutide for the India and some other markets also. So those, I think, from Q1, the patent goes off in March 2026. So we see that I think Q1 revenue should capture that depending on the other market players, depending on the regulatory approval, DCI approval that is and depending on how the market goes. So it's too preliminary to talk about GLP-1. But like I said, there is an important bandwidth being utilized for that. But yes, that should be -- if whatever comes the upside would come in Q1.

Bhavya Sonawala

analyst
#21

Understood. Just a last question. I think you spoke about it, but just trying to reconfirm from the last quarter to this quarter, the revenue increase has been quite nominal. So is that of the result of one that you spoke about some API prices have taken a dip and the second that the CMO business has taken a hit because I'm assuming Indore would have scaled up quite a bit, considering 40 molecules have already -- that transfer has been done. So is that those reasons? Or is there something else that is kind of making the revenue look very marginal in terms of last quarter?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#22

So when you compare April to June to July to September, if you see the additional revenue, which whatever you can see as compared to the last year is purely Indore, related because as you know, we are almost out of capacity in Navsari. Now answering your question specifically about Q1 versus Q2. So there's always a transition where some quarters, you take a product like a teicoplanin and some quarters you take a product like a pantoprazole. So even though the capacity utilized in terms of units is increasing from Q2 to Q1. But of course, we had more production of like vancomycin, azithromycin and what you call pantoprazole products happening in Q2, whereas in Q1, we had orders more of tigecycline, teicoplanin, where the top line was a little bit more higher. So this averaging as the batches get transferred, they are campaign-based production, which is happening in Indore. So you will see the cumulative effect coming in maybe Q4, where you will have both the basket and product being stabilized because the advantage of Indore is that once I take a batch of a teicoplanin is 105,000 vials or a tigecycline, which is almost 44,000 vials, then the repeat orders come after almost a quarter. So with the existing clients, what we have or even our domestic business, the inventory buildup. So the advantage of the large, I would say, batch size in Indore helps us to keep the capacity free for any opportunity business coming in. So the Q1 was mostly where you had high pricing and high revenue molecules. That's a mix. Even though the quantity increased in Q2, you had then low revenue products like pantoprazole or vancomycin or azithromycin being part of the tech transfer. As you go more in the Q3, there will be some Fungin with a mixture of even, I would say, glutathione and doxycycline, which again are a mixture of medium and high-end products, but the volumes of Fungin are less and the -- I mean, the low transfer pricing models are high. So that mixture will continue, and you will see the benefit from Q4, like I said, as a whole.

Operator

operator
#23

The next question comes from the line of Adityapal from MSA Capital Partners.

Adityapal Singh Jaggi

analyst
#24

Am I audible?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#25

Yes, Aditya. Please go ahead.

Adityapal Singh Jaggi

analyst
#26

Just a lot of my questions have been answered. Just wanted to understand, so now that a lot of our CMO partners have audited or are in the process of auditing our Indore plant, a large part of that revenue will move to Indore. So there will be a dual effect, right? Navsari will start contributing a lot to exports and the CMO will move from Indore. So if you can just touch upon how the current Q3 looking and the Q4 looking in terms of plant audits from our existing customers?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#27

Yes. So almost 4 of our clients have already gone full-fledged to Indore, except, of course, there are some residual products, which always go depending on the media sale, the liposomal Amphotericin B and the depot injections are not shifted it to Indore because there we want to go for a onetime validation for international market and domestic market together. So we hope that around 3 more clients would be onboarded along with the 4 clients also. I'm looking at purely domestic CMOs right now. Of course, there are small, small individual clients, which normally have 1 product or a couple of products at max, which also are going to be added. But the major, like say, we had around 12 to 14 major clients. Out of the 12 to 14, we can assume that 50% should be onboarded there by Q3. And also, there will be a new product line in terms of the vials as well as the ampules, which we are looking at CMO beyond the existing product line in Navsari. So those also should start kicking in from Q4 and Q1 next year. So that's why I mentioned that by Q4, you get a little bit of a holistic view. And again, to say that the erosion in prices do not contribute much in terms of the Indore project as such. But that is mostly the Critical Care and the, I would say, Sparsh division, which is normally -- that's an ongoing thing which happens year-on-year also. So this is what I see. I think Q3, you'll see 3 more. And then by Q4, you will see a little bit more of a mixture of existing clients coming in plus new clients coming in for new product lines.

Adityapal Singh Jaggi

analyst
#28

So just a bit of color on -- can I say Q3 and Q4 will be -- because I assume Q2 will be flat in terms of CMO revenue, but Q3 and Q4 could be a large bump up in terms of CMO revenue along with our existing scale-up of our domestic banner business as well as slight uptick in exports because of ban being cleared in Navsari. Is that the way to look at it?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#29

So I think large as compared to your definition, might be different. You're saying that on the lighter side. But yes, definitely, there will be an upside. How much will that be? We are trying to fit in as many pending orders as possible. So I would hope that the QA clearances from the other clients come a little bit faster, so we can ship them. But you also have to understand that these clients also are actually building -- build up almost 3 months inventory from Navsari before they shift because they also keep this transition risk in place before they actually shift from site A to site B, keeping in mind any issues or anything which comes in troubleshooting, which is a normal protocol which happens. So I still expect a decent -- I would say I would expect an upside in Q3. But in Q4, I would definitely expect a little bit, I would say, more decent or better upside.

Adityapal Singh Jaggi

analyst
#30

Understood. Just one last question. So first of all, congratulations on the GLP-1. The other thing is just wanted to understand your view in terms of biosimilars or biologics because a large part of those molecules are lyophilized. So are we planning to enter that value chain either through CMO or export? Are we already in discussions? What is your view on that?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#31

So biologicals become, I would say, defined in many parameters like a monoclonal antibody or a recombinant set of products or for that matter, even conjugates going on and there are other molecules also. So botulinum toxin also, I consider a part of that thing which we already are into. The vaccine thing is something which we already do, but that will have its own time period of whatever x 5 years. Recombinant products in terms of in hormones beyond hCG, hMG, LH is what we are already working on, and we are working on hCG also. So we have our own set of biological work happening in our pipeline. or maybe launch in terms of botulinum toxin, which would be more relevant to our therapeutic focus. But in terms of monoclonal antibodies, I think we would not be going into because that's not our core competency. Plus we -- all other companies already have a better lead than us, and we are too late or -- I mean, very frankly, first of all, we don't have our basic therapeutic prowess there. And I think even if we want to get into there, there are better people than us who are doing it and the pricing and the lead they have, I think it will be not economically viable for me to get into the monoclonal antibodies. So this is my opinion. I may be wrong, but this is my opinion as of now.

Adityapal Singh Jaggi

analyst
#32

No, I just wanted to understand your thought process. It's very clear.

Operator

operator
#33

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Shubham from Tikri Investments.

Shubham Selvadi

analyst
#34

Congratulations, sir, for a good set of number. So sir, our revenue have grown by 6% quarter-on-quarter basis. So can I assume that it is fully contributed by Indore division? So around -- in the last conference call, you told that you were utilizing around 18% to 20% of Indore total capacity. So it would be around 24% to 25% this quarter.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#35

Right. So yes, I think Roonghta, sir can give a better percentage idea because he does this also on a monthly and a quarterly basis. But yes, you would be somewhat right. Roonghta, sir, would you be right that 18% would have evolved to 24% or around. I'm sure that 22%, 23% was last month. I'm sure it would be around 24% now.

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#36

Yes. Basically, whatever the top line has come basically is only from Indore. There is no change in the revenue from the Navsari because Navsari capacity has been fully utilized. Presently, the production capacity is around 25%, but the sale will be around 23% during this quarter because it's a certain material line is the stock, but the production was around 25% and sale is around 23%.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#37

Yes, because something will be the validation, which we'll keep, which we will not be selling also absolutely. Yes.

Shubham Selvadi

analyst
#38

Okay. And sir, there is a steep increase in our current tax assets. So can you give a brief about it?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#39

Can you repeat that again?

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#40

basically, what's happened, it is not increase in the debt. If you see the cash in hand, it is INR 70 crores lying in the cash in hand because on 30th September, the bank has requested that instead of you repaying our cash utilized, you fully utilize our cash credit and keep the balance in current account. That is the reason. If you remove the cash -- the INR 65 crores, which has been showing as a cash in hand compared to last quarter, last half only, then you will see the loan has also become now.

Shubham Selvadi

analyst
#41

Okay. And sir, are we expecting EBITDA breakeven in Indore facility in this year?

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#42

Yes. In Q4, we are expecting the EBITDA breakeven is going to come.

Operator

operator
#43

The next question comes from the line of Rajkumar Vaidyanathan from RK Investments.

Rajkumar Vaidyanathan

analyst
#44

Can you hear me?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#45

Yes, sir. Please, go ahead.

Rajkumar Vaidyanathan

analyst
#46

Just a few questions. So first one is on the CapEx that we have incurred so far. I just wonder what is the maximum asset turn we can expect? I think we have about INR 500 crores worth of CapEx, right, I mean, in terms of fixed assets. So 4 numbers are good numbers to look at or?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#47

So if I understood your question correctly, what is the total CapEx and what sort of returns can we expect on that CapEx? Is that right?

Rajkumar Vaidyanathan

analyst
#48

What is the top line can be?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#49

Yes. The top line, yes, top line. So Roonghta,sir do you want to take that?

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#50

Yes, no problem. The total CapEx for Indore, including the interest capitalization, everything is around INR 350 crores, INR 355 crores. And according to our estimate, if the product mix is -- top line is depending upon a lot of factors, product mix that is depending upon international market as well as domestic market. But we are expecting that the top line will be in the range of INR 750 crores to INR 800 crores at 70% to 80% capacity utilization.

Rajkumar Vaidyanathan

analyst
#51

Okay. So that's about 2x the number. Okay. Sir, the next question is, what is the outlook on the borrowing side? So where do you see this number in the next 2 to 3 years?

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#52

Basically, we do not have any major CapEx plan in next 2 years, and there will be revenue generation. Today, our borrowing, including working capital as well as term loan is around between INR 350 crores, INR 360 crores. And or Indore also, whenever there is increasing in the working capital requirement because whenever there is a top line increase, we require to have an outstanding debtors as well as working capital requirement for inventory also. So whatever the increasing in the top line is going to come, that working capital requirement, we will not going to borrow. So we feel that 2 years whatever additional working capital is required for Indore plant, we will be able to generate from internal revenue and the loan should come down to from INR 350 crores to INR 300 crores after 2 years.

Operator

operator
#53

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Nitin Gosar from Bank of India Mutual Fund.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#54

Sir, this would be more a broader question. I wanted to understand over the next 3 years, if I were to understand the packing order in which the business is going to shape up. I think from a bandwidth perspective, Indore utilization is the top priority. But then within the business segment, if you could help us understand where does botulinum or women health care or CMO business, how do this stack up on priorities? We understand the efforts that you are putting in through the PPT or press release that you give out. But how should we understand the gravity of those efforts in terms of how -- what is the big picture looking like? Like would hospital segment become the critical part of our COG or would women health care will become a critical part of our COG in 2020? If you could just help us put the broad jigsaw puzzle.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#55

Yes. So if you see the -- I divide our entire business into purely injectables. And injectables also, if you see the product lineup, we have either a Critical Care or we have -- so we have a life-saving and we have a life-giving, let's put it that way. Botulinum toxin, of course, becomes like the third anchor because that's sort of a separate thing. So let me first focus on the life-saving part. That's the Critical Care part of business, where we have 2 divisions, which is Critical Care. Of course, it has further divisions down, but major parent division is Critical Care and the second parent division is Sparsh. Where we -- because of the product baskets, which we are getting from Navsari and now in Indore, we have gone for a little bit more of a focused approach. So the anti -- so in the Critical Care, we have the CX and Micro Care and then we have the Prima care. In Sparsh, we have a complete focus on dual chamber bags, contrast medias as well as total parenteral nutrition. So we have clearly done that the entire manufacturing backward core competency of Gufic should be focused in the market going forward, by which there are -- in the pipeline, we have also more products coming in all these, I would say, 2 divisions, which we'll take it through. So this, in spite of having no product approval in this year. So if you saw in the last 2 years, ceftazidime/avibactam was the only launch of [indiscernible 41:25]. And then in DCJ, we have almost now 3, 4 products coming in, in terms of aztreonam/avibactam and omadacycline and then rezafungin. So every year, if we hope to even launch one new product and increase the penetration by I would say, more hospitals, we hope that in Cardiac Critical with the erosion, 8% to 10% should be the way going forward. Sparsh would be a little bit of a different approach because there, we are looking into contrast media, total parenteral nutrition and dual chamber bag. But even after 2 years of launching the dual chamber bag, we finally got the approval of the price increase in the month of September 2025. So meropenem bag, which we always wanted to have almost a 30% premium, we finally got a 15% premium allowed by the government. So that is a big headwind for us that will help us to now launch the dual chamber in a much more relevant way because the hospital also has to look into the margins. They also get selling a vial against a DCB also. So these 2 Sparsh would go for a higher trajectory in terms of growth because the base is also hardly INR 50 crores, INR 60 crores, whereas Critical Care is around INR 200 crores. So that is what is there. In fertility, which is right now around -- combined with 2 segments of Ferticare and Ferticare life or we call it the FertiMax these 2 would combine cross close to INR 100 crores or more than INR 100 crores this year again. And then go for -- after the launch of the new UnoGen that is Superpure FSH, we hope that, that journey would be around 15% to 20% year-over-year. Botulinum toxin is a very small base. So even though we grow by, like I said, 22% because -- or we grow by even a little bit higher, we hope that, that requires a little bit more of brand building, environmental run capacity -- I mean, I would say, category building. And that -- I always talk about the hockey stick. I don't know when it will come, but our efforts are on to get the hockey stick going on because of the margins available on that product that we can really invest in the category-building part of it also. The international business, of course, would be growing at a much higher percentage. And that is -- would come once as India -- as Indore declutters Navsari, you will see more and more back orders being taken care of from Navsari. And that is the time and we also have an audit coming up. So we hope that by January to March, our Indore also would be EU GMP approved. So then we can see some site amendments or tech transfers happening from -- not tech transfer, I would say, some product transfer happening for the international market also from Q1, Q2 2027 to Indore, which will again, I would say, declutter the capacity further. So international business overall, which is mostly injectables, the same thing. They are the same injectables what we sell in the India market. There's no separate product basket. So life-saving, the life-giving and also the talks and that's our focus in the international market also. The approach is different. In some countries, we have a field force. In some countries, we do it via distributors. In some countries, we direct supply to the MA holder and then they distribute. So these are the 3 approaches which will continue. But overall, we hope that the focus of a jump of 20% year-over-year or 15%, 20% year-over-year should continue with all these things started -- once they start kicking in together.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#56

Very clear. And Selvax, if you could help us understand SVX, how much amount we are putting in as an NCR&D or any budget or any timeline that you have in mind, how much you want to invest be in these kind of products?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#57

Selvax. Yes. So Selvax was just a pure investment in terms of to see how it goes. It was -- it's a very interesting thing where we have in India rights and also the development thing, but I believe the company in South Australia is still working on the preclinical and the cell line capitalization. So I would just see it's not -- I think the total investment also would not be more than 100,000, 150,000 right now and then followed by certain milestones where we have taken some, I think, 6% stake in that company. And hoping that once we get a breakthrough there, we should get the front-end advantage in India and also some other countries where we have exclusivity, because I feel in solid tumors, there's nothing better than the immuno-oncology, which was my thesis topic also way back in U.S. So I really believe in what we are doing. The combination of anti-CD40 antibodies and interleukins are solid science to take care of solid tumors specifically. And I think in the next 2, 3 years, we'll come to know whether the success is there or if they cannot take it through, I'm sure someone else will show interest and might just take them ahead, take it over. And it's -- for me, it's like I'm more of a passenger there rather than, I would say, a contributor here. The vaccine and the toxin part is something as biological, which I would like to pursue taking it forward. So that's the reality of Selvax as of now.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#58

Got it. Very clear. And today's gross margin, do they reflect the true picture or the potential that the company carries over the next 3 years? Or we should also expect a change over here?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#59

Yes, I think Roonghta sir will answer that -- yes...

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#60

On the gross margin part, I understand there is an operating leverage available because of Indore.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#61

You're referring to the gross margin, right? Sorry, I think -- please go ahead, Roonghta, sir. I interrupt you. Please go ahead, sir.

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#62

If you see the past history of Gufic from last 2 years, the gross margin is between 18% to 19%. And after...

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#63

EBITDA margin, yes, 18% to 19% EBITDA...

Devkinandan Roonghta

executive
#64

18% to 19% after 2, 3 years -- after 3 years, after Indore, I feel that the gross margin should at least be at 20%. It may touch 21% after we increase our sales ratio Presently, our sales ratio is around 20%, 25% to international market. If it touch to 30%, 35%, then the gross margin may touch to 21%, 22% -- sorry, EBITDA margin will touch to 21%, 22%.

Nitin Gosar

analyst
#65

EBITDA, yes. Got it. good job and we want to back you up. It might be a long journey, but yes.

Operator

operator
#66

The next question comes from the line of Nitya Shah from KamayaKya Wealth Management.

Nitya Shah

analyst
#67

Am I audible?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#68

Yes, go ahead, Nitya.

Nitya Shah

analyst
#69

So I firstly want to thank you for the detailed question and answer that you do every con call. So from my understanding, I feel that you have a novel product in the Botox space. You have intellectual property. And you mentioned that in the future, you may have to do a capacity expansion to cater to the proposal which you said that you will consider at a later point in time. So I realize that there are a lot of segments which you are already catering to. So why not focus more towards the Botox side of things, considering it's a novel product rather than trying to cater to so many different segments? So maybe throw some more light on that.

Pranav Choksi

executive
#70

Yes. So if I understand your question correctly, if you see my -- our legacy and our core competency is injectable lyophilized manufacturing and all these life giving, life-saving and toxin, I call it Stunnox just because it's our trademark. I avoid selling Botox, but yes. So all these are part of the legacy of the same lyophilized the core competency of the company. So if you see today also the scalability, I'll first answer your toxin question first and why the focus is India and then maybe the world. If you see in the entire world, the total market would be anything around $5 billion to $7 billion -- $5.5 billion to $6 billion or with a projection of around $7 billion, $8 billion and some reports it's around $7 billion to $8 billion, some reports, it's $5.5 billion to $6 billion. There, already, there is a legacy of Botox, Allergan, AbbVie or Galderma for that matter. In India, the current infrastructure, what we have created and what we can -- at least we can enter or we can really focus on the Indian market where the total revenue of the toxin both in therapeutic as well as neurological segment is only $25 million or even less than that, sorry, it was -- if I correct, it's around anything around $18 million to $20 million. That's the only revenue of toxin in India. If I compare the population of every other country and the actual, I would say, sales thing, I think India is still the penetration and a lot of work has to be done. And we feel that for me to tomorrow, to create another asset of $25 million in terms of -- even -- and very frankly, we are not looking at taking any debt also to create that asset maybe after 1 or 2 years. We're very clear that there would be a debt funded by a partner, which is something in line of what we got earlier as an offer. And tomorrow, the partner will get the rights of the front end in certain markets and certain markets would open to us also. So that's the strategy which we are going to follow. But the important strategy is that when you come up with that sort of a setup, you need an entire bandwidth of regulatory of quality of my CEO, Mr. Nagesh also to meet their hands on when the entire thing -- we've seen what happened with Indore also, the entire bandwidth gets sucked on to that. And we feel that already we are sitting on quite decent, I would say, pillars or basis which anchors which we can focus on. And even in case of toxin, if we focus on the Indian market with the current setup which we have, we should do that. Just to cater that international business and the international market where anyway competition is higher and there's a sort of a different mindset because once you get into the regulatory process there, you need a pharmacovigilance, you need something else. There's a lot of other things also which get associated with the toxin business. It's not as simple. I feel even in the next 2 years, again, I'm saying, if we focus on India, get it to INR 100 crore level business as a Gufic as such. But already we have now -- only we have launched the product 3 years or 4 years ago. 4 years in, I think aesthetics and -- sorry, 3 years in aesthetics and maybe 2, 2.5 years in neurology, and we already are #2. So we already have crossed the other players and reached to a revenue where we are #2 after AbbVie. So we feel like it's focused there. Of course, focus on our Cardiac Critical infertility for which we have this amazing infrastructure in Indore. We have a great pipeline coming up also. And with a 15%, 20% headway coming down the line once we are cash positive, much more than what we are right now. We already are cash back a little bit more cash positive and the debt has been repaid, we can take a little bit more bolder steps in terms of the regulatory as well as the bandwidth creation also. And that's why I'm thinking in this year also, if you see a lot of bandwidth has been created by addition of these new, I would say, leaders for our international business, our gynac infertility business, our botulinum toxin business and even for Sparsh with Mr. Rajesh Kaul. So this structuring happened this year, and we'll see the benefits in the next 2 to 3 years. And then once we are ready and a little bit more mature there, then of course, we should look at the bandwidth addition also. But for me, as management also, we should be very clear how many reviews, how many MIS we need to take. And any new division coming up always takes more time of us. So I feel we are okay for the next 2 years to go for that 15%, 20% year-over-year and become a little bit comfortable more with debt and more cash flow. And then I would be more than happy to satisfy you also in terms of the international appetite of botulinum toxin.

Nitya Shah

analyst
#71

Right, sir. Because I remember just a few -- like, I would say, a year or 2 ago, we had discussed this where you had mentioned that there was a clear price differential between the pricing of botulinum toxin here and abroad. That's why I just thought that capturing export market share through a lower price differential would really benefit. And it's like a very niche novel product which is why I was saying that maybe we could be more...

Pranav Choksi

executive
#72

So it's not -- so when I meant it that time also, I didn't mean the pricing part of it. I mean the price was there. But in order to get that price also like today, if you go to a Dubai or to a U.S. or Europe, when anyone is going for an aesthetic use of toxin, they want to do the best. I mean for them, a small delta of price doesn't make a decision that I want. So they always say, if I'm paying so much for my, I would say, cosmetic treatment, which is anything around INR 50,000 to maybe INR 5 lakhs, whatever, I would prefer to have the best of the brands. So for us also to go, it's not the infrastructure, which would be there. There would be a lot of clinical trials which need to be done a head-on data, which has to be created country-wise. We also have to go for -- which anyway we are doing in India right now. Right now a lot of our revenue goes in creating all this data for the India market, but that would have to be replicated on a much higher scale and where the cost is also much higher to enter for the regulatory process to go for the clinical data. So even the entry point to all these countries for getting that delta and pricing would require a very high upfront, which I feel we should do after 2 years. And of course, I think even in the last 30 years of this molecule, there have been only 6 to 7 players of this. I'm sure the next 2, 3 years. We will not get a plethora of people coming in. So we still -- I feel we still have time.

Nitya Shah

analyst
#73

That's a great point, yes. Yes. And sir, last question from my side is that you had mentioned regarding semaglutide, right, that you would be contract manufacturing. Could you throw some more light on that? What is the potential of this?

Pranav Choksi

executive
#74

I don't have that knowledge because we are pure CMOs of Hetero and they have done the market analysis. We have invested in the back end to support them. So it will be very preliminary of me to comment on this because the front-end strategy is completely handled by Hetero. Of course, we have the projections for next year and all that. But like I said, it's not something I control, so I would refrain from talking anything right now. I would rather let the lead company to take the initiative. I'm more than happy as a CMO partner backing them up.

Operator

operator
#75

Ladies and gentlemen, as there are no further questions from the participants, I would now like to hand the conference over to Ms. Shweta Shetty for closing comments.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#76

Thank you very much for joining us today. If you have any further questions, please feel free to reach out to our Investor Relations team, and we will be happy to address them separately. With that, we conclude today's call. Thank you. Take care.

Operator

operator
#77

Thank you, ma'am. On behalf of Gufic Biosciences Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Gufic Biosciences Limited transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Gufic Biosciences Limited earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.