Hapag-Lloyd Kreuzfahrten GmbH (TUI1) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 7, 2020

Deutsche Boerse Xetra DE Consumer Discretionary Hotels, Restaurants and Leisure m_and_a 34 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to TUI Group's update conference call. [Operator Instructions] Let me now turn the floor over to your hosts, Friedrich Joussen and Birgit Conix.

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#2

So good morning, everybody, from Hamburg. It has been a busy night. And tonight, and I can say that it was anyhow, I think, a very successful night because we could sign our agreement with TUI Cruises and Royal Caribbean this morning. And therefore, I'm very happy to have you on the call. So short term, and thank you for being present just in before our results announcement in next week. So a couple of thoughts, after a couple of slides, and then we are open for your questions. First slide, it highlights our strategy again, which you all know, it is the same slide we showed in December. Just to recap, we want to defend our market shares and grow our markets in the market and airline business. So we will talk about that when we talk about the results. Then we have the bottom 2 boxes, GDN-OTA, Destination Experiences, our new digitalization opportunity. We are in the midst of digital transformation. We will become a digital platform company in the next years. And then we have what is today the core of the business, holiday experiences benefiting from vertical integration. You can recall, we always have vertical integrations, content-centric. We deliver premium returns and the contents will be scaled in the market. That is the strategy. Now historically, we have actually been going through assets and we have actually reinvested proceeds from actually our disposals and assets. We also have said, in the future, we'll be more asset-right. Asset-right means we invest when it's necessary on our balance sheet. And if it's possible, we will actually not invest, but be more asset-light. And the first step -- big step we are doing right now is in that direction is actually the disposal of Hapag-Lloyd into our joint venture, TUI Cruises. So it is in line with the strategy. What is the deal? We sell Hapag-Lloyd, which we operate 100% into the TUI Cruises joint venture for enterprise value of EUR 1.2 billion. When you think about Hapag-Lloyd, just 5 years ago, it was making losses. We try to find a buyer who would pay the book value. Unfortunately, we didn't find a buyer at that point in time. We have restructured the business. Now it's EUR 1.2 billion. The nice thing on top of that is not only we get the proceeds and deleverage the company through the deconsolidation of debt account to that. But also, we retain the profit pool of 50% for the future growth and synergies. We assume that this will be another EUR 300 million-plus value. So that will come on top of EUR 1.2 billion. The whole transaction is roughly debt-financed to be -- do a little bit of equity injection of EUR 75 million. Our piece here, and EUR 75 million, of course, of Royal Caribbean. Everything else is debt-financed in the company of TUI Cruises. The tax facilities of the company is strong enough to do that and to retain the dividends, which we have envisaged and looked. So therefore, that is very good and closing anticipated for mid-summer. Now when I look at the strategic and financial benefits, let's look at the strategic benefits first. TUI Cruises has been at extreme success. We, obviously, is the most profitable cruise company in the world, at least in the world, Caribbean world because they have comparisons. And of course, vertical integration is important because our sales power is very strong. The problem and the challenge and also, let's say, the positives on TUI Cruises not growing fast enough because their capacity is limited. That actually generates -- it's also part of the premium returns, but it's also limiting growth. At the same time, we had Hapag-Lloyd. Hapag-Lloyd was a German-focused luxury brand or German luxury and expedition brand. International expansion was always something we wanted to do, but it was a little bit risky because we don't have this international footprint and also the question of financing -- on balance sheet financing would have been initial. So the idea now is we put both companies together. The TUI Cruises will be growing because it can grow through Hapag-Lloyd and Hapag-Lloyd can grow because it has access to the international footprint of Royal Caribbean and that facility is which we have in free in Royal Caribbean. So it's a win-win and strategic. Both companies couldn't have been more for different reasons now grow. So the benefits we are leveraging here is that, let me clear that we keep the brand, product, marketing and sales. That is what our specialty is, and we use RCL shipbuilding know-how and global footprint. And because we get EUR 1.2 billion, we get access to the additional value, we keep our powder dry for digital expansion because we don't have to finance the growth in TUI Cruises, Hapag-Lloyd Cruise because that will be done in TUI Cruises joint venture. Now on the financial side, and it's also very attractive because EUR 1.2 billion is a very attractive size. Particularly, when you think about, we put EUR 75 million equity, and we get EUR 1.2 billion. This is very attractive. On top of that, we get the EUR 300 million plus synergy value plus growth. For Royal Caribbean is also a very good deal because they put EUR 75 million, also achieved with EUR 300 million plus, and they have the strategic benefit to get access to the best cruise brand in the world. And therefore, I think it's a win-win for both of us. And as you know, I'm very excited with my partnership with Royal Caribbean because they are good partners. We have a long experience and a very serious and good partnership in that respect. We -- on the financial side, as I said, TUI Cruises is very cash-generative. It has a good debt facilities. We are well within covenants, particularly when it comes to all the ECA financing, as you know, is very important in that business. And we will see no reduction of dividends to TUI. And particularly I'm very pleased because we will be strengthening our balance sheet. We have said that we will do -- put money into digital expansion. And this year, we talked about high double-digit. Of course, we anticipated already earlier in the year that we -- the likelihood of having a deal like this. Something like this would be possible. So a lot of this will be actually now -- we will put into the deleveraging of the company. And when you look on the next slide, you'll see the enterprise value is EUR 1.2 billion. The net proceeds will be around EUR 700 million. The other thing -- the other -- the remainder is actually the equity injections and the deleveraging. The deleveraging will create something like 0.2 or close to 0.2 gross debt. The leverage improvement in the gross debt area, of course, the additional cash is available, and therefore, you could take that also into account. So it is something which is good for our balance sheet. And when you look at our capital -- new capital allocation frame, what we always have said, organic asset-right growth. That's what we do. This digitalization, we -- again, it's largely organic. And we also have said we will look that we have a healthy balance sheet as well. And therefore, you might be pleased that we get here to there, and we are conservative in that respect. That said, I think it's a great deal for both of us, for RCL as well as for us. It is a great deal for TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd because it unleashes growth potential, asset-right and potential, which at the end of the day, it wouldn't have been possible. We envisage that 3 years from now, 50% of what actually we bring into TUI Cruises of Hapag-Lloyd, 50% will be at least the value of the 100% today. So that's what the deal will be doing for us. So we believe it's something which is a no-brainer and a very good thing to do, and we are very happy that we pulled it over this morning. Thank you very much for listening in, and now we are open for your questions.

Operator

operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] The first question for today comes from Ms. (sic) [ Mr. ] Jamie Rollo calling from Morgan Stanley.

Jamie Rollo

analyst
#4

Yes, 3 questions, please. First of all, I'm just wondering, would you have done this transaction, if you have lost -- if the company have lost about EUR 700 million from the MAX grounding last year and this year and being so close to the leverage target? In other words, is this -- is there any sort of industrial logic behind this? Or is it just to shore up the balance sheet? Secondly, it looks like essentially leverage on Hapag-Lloyd is going to be about EUR 1 billion, albeit, I guess, shareholder loans, but it looks like the combined TUI Cruise and since it's going to have pretty high leverage. So can you talk a bit about the -- first of all, the leverage on that joint venture? I agree it's off-balance sheet, but just trying to understand that. And the final question is, where does it leave Marella in the U.K., could that be another option to sell into the JV in the future?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#5

Okay, Jamie, I mean, I tried to explain the logic. I mean you get EUR 1.2 billion, your EBITDA -- your EBIT contribution in 3 years will be what it would have been on 100%. When you look at valuations, when you look at everything, we are 2 companies which couldn't have grown, now grow. The industrial logic is so compelling and that actually -- that is something which I think is an absolute no-brainer. The leverage in the company is around 4, which is for a cruise company is not big, yes. I mean not at all. The cash capabilities of that business is -- and the cash flows are enormous. And Marella, yes, I mean we are -- we have set in our strategy that it will be asset-right. And when I say we are asset-right, then I mean we are asset-right. We will look at things and if things are compelling, we will do it. And I think I don't know. But I mean, particularly, many people would have said, maybe you know, this is the core of the business, will they do it and so on and so on. We have said we will become a digital platform company. When I say we want to become a digital platform company, that's what it will be. And if we find good deals but it must be always good deals. We can -- we will not do deals just for making deals, but we only will make compelling deals. And if this is not compelling, I would not -- I will not understand it. Birgit?

Birgit Conix

executive
#6

Yes. So maybe I can add to what Fritz said. So the deal makes both strategic and financial sense. And of course, as Fritz already alluded to, together with Royal Caribbean, we will be able to accelerate growth significantly. And we will treat this if you will look at our new capital allocation policy, and indeed, we do have a Boeing MAX issues. So in light of that, in the short run, we will use the proceeds according to this new capital allocation policy taking into account leverage, et cetera. But on the longer run, that is what we see with the increased earnings that we will generate from Hapag-Lloyd. We will also further invest into our new strategy with digitalization and everything we communicated.

Operator

operator
#7

The next question comes from James Ainley, calling from Citi.

James Ainley

analyst
#8

I've got 3, please. First is, can you tell us what the book value of business is? Second, could you quantify the synergies? I mean you said those EUR 300 million synergy value, but what do you think the annual run rate could be? And then third, how do you plan to internationalize the business? Because I guess they're both TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd freight German-focused brands at the moment. So how do you plan to internationalize? And would you need to invest some of the synergies to do that?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#9

So the synergies are duly published synergies. I mean I think we might not even do that. But on the -- what I said is in 3 years, we will make up for actually 50%, which we give up. So therefore, this is partly synergy, this is partly growth. Of course, then this is only a snapshot. It will grow over time. I say, the net asset value quantification, I said is at least EUR 300 million, might be even more. On the internationalization, this will mainly focus on the expedition and not so much on -- initially on the expedition and not so much on the -- initially on the ultra luxury. I mean the expedition is a no-brainer. When you look at the demand increase of expedition cruising in the world, it's enormous. And I have seen a lot of new tonnage coming up, and we have the other one of the oldest expedition and most experienced and, by the way, the most luxurious expedition company in the world with outclass quality ships everywhere, which means we are one of the few who really go at Antarctica. We are one of the few who really go at very extreme conditions. And that is something which is very compelling to customers. And here, of course, the international footprint of Royal Caribbean is also very important when it comes to the whole harbor management and route management and network and so on. And so that's also very important. So it will be the luxury cruise, luxury expedition, which we will initially focus to. Now on the last one?

Birgit Conix

executive
#10

Yes, on the book gains. So we said considerable book gain and this means mid-triple-digit millions.

Operator

operator
#11

The next question for today comes from Richard Clarke calling from Bernstein.

Richard Clarke

analyst
#12

Yes, just 3 questions for me. Just want to make sure I completely understand the bridge from the EUR 1.2 billion to the EUR 700 million proceeds because presumably, some of that is lease debt and maybe just the terms of this earnout, the EUR 63 million earnout. Is that a 1-year earnout or is that over multiple years? And second question, the impact on the JV income. You said no reduction in dividends. But does that mean dividend is probably flat? And what will be the impact on the actual JV income given the higher debt within TUI Cruises JV? And you talked about the ability to accelerate growth, how does that actually come about given these restrictions and the ability to get new ships? Does Royal Caribbean give access to new expedition ships to put into the JV? How do they get better access to that growth?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#13

Okay. So -- yes, so on the last one, and maybe I'd say that at least Birgit has the 2 first. I mean the last one, the restriction of the yard capacity is focused on the big ships, right? The small ships, the yard capacity is not a problem, right? So that is what we always said, and we have actually now also -- we have [ 2 ] new ships. So -- but again, with our -- if you look at our yield, our yields are all above 600. If we want to expand in ultra luxury, it will be dangerous to expand too much in Germany because the enemy of high yields is actually volume. And we believe that international is the right way to go. And they are -- the restriction of the yard is not an issue but added to the new ships. So we are not in any -- in used ships with that kind of brand, which is the highest-rated luxury brand in the world when it comes to the Berlitz Cruise Guide. So we always need to be #1. So the used ships are not an option here. Maybe on the 2 other things, Birgit?

Birgit Conix

executive
#14

Yes. So in terms of valuation and proceeds, you asked about the bridge. So clearly, the EUR 43 million EBITA for the full year '19 times the -- 20 -- 8x multiple, it gets us to the EUR 1.2 billion, but I'm very much sure that you count that. And from that, if you deduct the net debt and the equity contribution, you get to the EUR 700 million proceeds. And as we are seating here with the deal team and Peter Krueger who actually closed the deal, I'm going to hand over to you. So maybe you can also comment on the earnout and how we structure.

Peter Krueger

executive
#15

Yes, sure. So as Birgit said, there will be another north of EUR 62.5 million and that is linked to the financial performance of the company of Hapag-Lloyd until September year-end. So you can see we're already halfway through the earnout, which effectively gives good visibility on the achievement level of the earnout.

Richard Clarke

analyst
#16

Okay. So the proceeds could be EUR 762.5 million?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#17

The 700...

Birgit Conix

executive
#18

Yes. No, it's already included there. Yes, yes, yes. It's in there. Yes.

Richard Clarke

analyst
#19

Okay. So the upfront cash is 600 -- and whatever that would be, EUR 36 million and there's a variable component on top of that.

Birgit Conix

executive
#20

Yes, yes. Absolutely.

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#21

At the end of September. The financial year-end -- our financial year-end.

Richard Clarke

analyst
#22

Yes. And then just a comment on no reduction of dividend. Is that -- can we interpret that to mean that the dividend will probably stay relatively flat while the company deleverages? Or can we see growth?

Birgit Conix

executive
#23

Yes, if you connect the -- actually, the very simple way to explain is that the synergies -- the future synergies will compensate the additional financing costs.

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#24

So that will go up, that will not be flat. That will be according to our numbers in the existing plan, yes? But you can see -- I mean, the EBITDA, which we also have in our announcement for '20 is already at EUR 90 million.

Operator

operator
#25

We have another question from Mark Fortescue calling from Stifel.

Mark Irvine-Fortescue

analyst
#26

My questions have been answered, actually.

Operator

operator
#27

The next question is from James Rowland Clark, he's calling from Barclays.

James Clark

analyst
#28

I've got two, please. The cash from the transaction, roughly EUR 700 million in net cash. How much of that is going to deleveraging the business and how much is going into the digital platform investment? And you're also sticking to that EUR 50 million to EUR 90 million spend for this year. So how should we think about that for next year, given the cash you're going to have in the summer once that's completed? Secondly, could you help sort of split out where the synergies are coming from in the JV once you've acquired Hapag-Lloyd? And also, finally, I presume you're going to not report Hapag-Lloyd in the JV separately once it's completed?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#29

So the synergy is very clear. I mean both -- we said in the building here and both said in the same building, and one is a very big company, one is a very small company. We will synergize on the most possible accepted brand. I mean so the -- meaning the brand, product proposition that stays because it's a little bit like Bugatti and Volkswagen, right? So for Bugatti and Audi. So this is part of the same family, there are synergies but at the same time, the brand needs to be queuing very separately. On the -- what was the first question again?

Birgit Conix

executive
#30

Yes, I can do that. And so the first question is the cash. So the EUR 700 million includes the earnout, as we just discussed during the previous question. And so as I said when I answered the first question, so we will look at our new capital allocation policy. So given the situation where we're in just now, we will balance everything. And we will prioritize now the balance sheet because we do have the situation of Boeing MAX, although it doesn't have to do with the transaction, of course, as we also explained. But you always have to look at your capital allocation policy, given the situation where we're in. So in the short term, we will use the proceeds to delever. And then you asked a question about digitalization expenses that we made, the double-digit million expenses and that is -- that just doesn't relate now to the proceeds because we already have included that in all of our plans. And we will talk more about that during the Q1 results as you will hear next week. And then on the JVs, you were asking about transparency, and that is something that we clearly said that we will be working also with the IR team, et cetera, so that we can provide enough transparency on all of our JV structures going forward. So that is a work in progress.

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#31

Sure. I mean I think the important point is, I think, we have very clearly looked at the asset [ growth, right ]. The point is we have a high double-digit investment. And I think the better for this year, perfectly fine. So for this year, you can see a full deleverage. But if this is successful, and we are very convinced that we'll be successful, then the transformation will be going on, and it will be not the last year we do, and it will be not the last proceeds we get and when you look at the trading level, not to be had -- I'm not talking today about trading. But -- so the world will go on, and we will become a different platform company 5 years from now. And that's what we have said. And with that, I think it's important that we have asset-right, and asset structures in place. And this transaction, has faster growth and deleveraging and access to significant funds so that for us, it's a good deal in all respects.

Operator

operator
#32

The next question comes from Stuart Gordon calling from Berenberg.

Stuart Gordon

analyst
#33

Yes. Just could you chat through -- you talked about the internationalization of the business. TUI Cruises, what proportion of their bookings come via RCL-only channels that we could get a flavor for perhaps how they could help here? Secondly, just again on the synergies. Could you explain why these synergies couldn't have been extracted without Hapag-Lloyd being part of the joint venture? And finally, and I'm sure this is -- there's a very simple answer to this I'm just missing. The net proceeds of EUR 700 million in Slide 5. But it looks as if you talk about pro forma going from EUR 910 million of net debt to EUR 80 million, that looks like EUR 1 billion of a shift in net debt. So can you just confirm to me what the EUR 300 million gap is there?

Birgit Conix

executive
#34

So I'll start with the bridge from the EUR 910 million and the EUR 1 billion that you are referring to and getting us to the plus EUR 80 million. That is, let's say, the EUR 700 million, we said it's including earnouts. So deduct from the EUR 700 million the earnout. Let's say, roughly EUR 30 million as was mentioned on the call. And then from that, you deduct the debt facilities in comparison with 2019. So that gets us to the plus EUR 80 million pro forma.

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#35

Okay, sales by a half year is 0. I mean and this is a German sales, I mean, all the sales are done by us here. And the synergies is actually -- couldn't we have done the synergies before. I mean and I think, no. When you look at -- we have a detailed bottom-up plan of the synergies. This comes to do you need 1 CFO or 2 CFOs? Or do you need 1 office or 2 offices? Or do you need 1 customer care or 2 customer cares? Or do you need 1 accounting or 2 accounting? I mean when you have 2 companies, you need 2 accounting, you need 2 CFOs. I mean long term, there are synergies which are -- that we do things together. Sales, how many salespeople do we have in the field and so on and so on. So today, it's always 2, 2, 2. But now the important point anyhow is the brands must not dilute. And that is very clear, but I come from the brand industry. And I know how to unmarket brand. And also, I see the marketing guys here. They have a full understanding how important the value of the brand is. So that is by the product, by the brand, by the customer care and these are the things we need to be separated, and we want to be separated. And because it's a difference, if you have EUR 170, EUR 180 per diem or if you have EUR 640 per diem, right? And that's something which is also very clear.

Operator

operator
#36

And the last question for today comes from Jurgen Kolb calling from Kepler Cheuvreux.

Jurgen Kolb

analyst
#37

Just 2 questions from my side, please. First of all, again, coming back on the Marella topic. Would the deal have not been possible if you would have added Marella into this whole structure? Just getting your thoughts on why you did not include Marella because it would have probably cleaned the whole division. Maybe also from the outside modeling point of view, a little bit clear -- in a clearer set up. And secondly, when do you think you can really add value from that transaction, thinking about you give away 50% of the business that is doing about a 16.5% EBIT margin or so. You put a lot of money into debt reduction, which is not very value-creative. But then you're saying you're generating additional growth. So when do you think this deal will be really value-creative on your side?

Friedrich Joussen

executive
#38

Okay. I'll try to make a point. I mean we cashed in EUR 1.2 billion and we will have EBIT, so EBITDA -- or EBIT neutral after 3 years. I mean how much more value, how much better can you create value? I mean I don't know how many transactions were of that quality. By the way, I mean, EUR 1.2 billion, as I've said, if we wouldn't have difficulties to sell to the book value of the company at that point in time, which was more or less EUR 100 million, I mean, 4 years or 5 years ago. I would say, in the last 4 years, 5 years, value-accretive, and I think value-accretive also in the future. And it's -- if it was just for ease of reporting and for ease of your models, we would have included Marella immediately. Unfortunately, that's not the prime targets of our M&A strategies. And there are many different points, which need to be considered, that is all of our asset structures. And I mean, when you look at our balance sheets, we have said that we will be asset-right. That says we look at each and every asset on the balance sheet. And it is on the continuous evaluation, how much it is critical to our business, how we execute finance growth best, what we can do to push the business forward. And Marella will be part of it as well as other assets as well. So therefore, for the time being, I would say the Hapag-Lloyd is something we say in German [Foreign Language]. So we just -- it's a slam dunk. It's easy, it's growth, it's cash, it's value-accretive without any -- so it was so obvious not only for us, but also for Royal Caribbean as well. So obvious that we are the right partners in that business as well for all our other JVs or asset company or asset holdings. We will have -- we have similar thoughts and thought processes. And Peter, you had office, our M&A, he is also our head of strategy. And I think he's just thinking about many things. It's not the end of our transactions. It's also not the start. That's also clear. And whenever things make sense, we will do things. And maybe that's the only thing I can say to that. Okay. Thank you very much for all of you to be on the call. I wish you a splendid Friday and a great weekend.

Operator

operator
#39

Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Hapag-Lloyd Kreuzfahrten GmbH transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Hapag-Lloyd Kreuzfahrten GmbH earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.