Harbour Energy plc (HBR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 8, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Lydia Rainforth
analystThank you very, very much for joining us what is the 40th Barclays Energy and Power.
Linda Cook
executiveI haven't been here for all of them.
Lydia Rainforth
analystSo I am delighted to be joined by Linda Cook, CEO of Harbour Energy. And Linda, thank you for joining us again. I say it's not the 40th one, but we've been doing. And what I love about our conversations with you is that you and the Harbour team are so busy. There's always a lot to talk about.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd so I'm going to start with some big picture strategic questions, and then we'll get into the asset base and go through that a little bit. And I think just to take a step back, it is hard to believe that the first acquisition for the group was nearly 10 years ago, I think, in the U.K. And obviously, Harbour has grown rapidly since that point, both in scale and in the geographic presence. So can you talk us through where you see Harbour standing now, particularly given the LLOG and Waldorf transactions in the past year. You had an Indonesian divestment. So I guess what I'm going to do, what is Harbour now? Where are we today?
Linda Cook
executiveSo as you said, we did our first acquisition now almost 10 years ago. We started out as a private company based in the U.S., and we raised money at a time when most people were actually spending money on nonproducing U.S. onshore shale acreage. And we decided the smarter thing to do at that point in time was to do the opposite, which was a contrarian, of course, but to buy conventional producing assets outside the U.S. because they were out of favor at the time. And we felt like there was a space in the market for another global independent because a number of them had been disappearing. So if you think about -- for those of you who have been in the business for a while like I have, the Anadarkos of the world, Enterprise Oil, names that were sort of household names back at the time were all being acquired by major oil and gas companies, and we felt like it was creating an opportunity for us to go down that path. And today, I think we've largely achieved that. We've now gone from 0 in terms of production through a series of acquisitions to 500,000 barrels a day. So I think we produced 509,000 barrels a day during the first half of this year. We have a good mix of oil and gas. We'd always set out to be diverse, not to be in a single country or basin so -- and also not to be just oil or just gas. So we have about 40% of our portfolio is oil. And I know many people in the U.S. when I say that, they're thinking, oh, that's too bad. You don't have more oil exposure. And then I go on to tell, actually, we also have 40% exposure to European gas, and that's trading at $130 per barrel today. So -- I think we hit $25 or $26 per MMBtu this morning. So that's a good balance for us in terms of the Brent exposure and the oil exposure. And then the other 20% is various domestic gas markets around the world. We're in 5 core countries. We like that amount of diversity from a geography standpoint. So it's Norway, U.K., U.S., Mexico and Argentina. And that feels good to us, and all of them have interesting opportunities, and we'll probably talk about some of them. We have an investment-grade balance sheet, which has also been a name of ours. And we have what we think is a really competitive shareholder distribution policy that allows our shareholders to benefit through distributions when we're in times like we are today with commodity prices being elevated.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd I love what you talked about, there is the ability to capture the higher prices through both the oil side and the gas side. And when you take a step back and look at the portfolio now and the transactions that you pursued from what was the U.K. originally how important was it for you to add lower cost, lower tax jurisdictions as well?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. That was definitely the driver behind our latest acquisition, which was the LLOG transaction in the U.S. that we always wanted to be in the U.S. conventional offshore production to the Gulf of Mexico at the time. Now Gulf of America made perfect sense for us. But it just had not found the right opportunity, even though we had kicked a lot of tires over the years. Portfolios were either non-operated or they were small without a lot of built-in growth. Maybe they had a lot of decommissioning. Maybe they were non-operated mostly gas. And what we were looking for was a set of assets that was oil-weighted and a lot of operational control and a really fantastic team, and we felt like we found that with the LLOG acquisition. And as you said, lower tax jurisdiction so that as our production growth in the Gulf of America, and as our production in the U.K. declines, we're lowering the average effective tax rate across our portfolio and improving cash margins. So that was a big one of the many drivers of that transaction.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd when you think about a LLOG transaction, the timing was remarkable.
Linda Cook
executiveYes. Thank you very much. For those who aren't familiar, we announced the deal in December of last year and then completed it in February. So it happened very quick, but it was literally just about 3 weeks or so, 2 weeks before the conflict broke out in the Middle East, so we got the timing just right on that one.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd how do you think about the prices that you have to pay to enter a new basin and in fact, the when you're making that decision, what metrics and how you think about that for CapEx for what is the sort of portfolio?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. I mean we look at things from a lot of different ways, and it's always starting with asset quality. And what gap it is we're trying to fill in our existing portfolio or where we're trying to take the portfolio over time. At the very beginning of Harbour's journey when we had nothing, it was about how do we get to scale in at least 1 basin, and that opportunity happened to present itself in the U.K., which is why we started there. We didn't have a goal to be a U.K. oil and gas producer. We had a goal to be a global diversified one, but you have to start somewhere. So we saw an opportunity to get to scale in the U.K., which we did. Then the focus really became on becoming more diverse and not having all of our eggs in the U.K. basket that drove the Premier Oil transaction in 2021. Barclays helped us with that. So thank you. I see some of your team here in the room. Then we set out to get scale outside of the U.K. And when we became publicly listed, sorry, with that transaction 2021, then we set out to get scale in some other countries, and that's what drove the Wintershall DEA data transaction, again, with some help from your team. It's an $11 billion deal that we completed, I think, 3 years ago now, and got us around 400,000-plus barrels a day and gave us scale in Norway, which was, I think, one of the big prizes. There were 2 most important assets in that transaction with the Norwegian portfolio, which is hard to buy on its own because there's so much competition for pure Norwegian portfolios. But with Wintershall DEA, we were able to get -- I think we're in the top 10, top 5 maybe producers in U.K. -- Norway today, but we were able to get that through a package transaction. But actually, the most important asset for us in Wintershall DEA were billions of dollars of investment-grade bonds. And that gave us because we ported those into Harbour that gave us the investment-grade balance sheet that we have today, which has been extremely useful. So that was kind of the driver behind that one. And then we've gone on to do LLOG, which I've already talked about. So they each have their own sort of personality, but we look at returns for sure, levered and unlevered returns. We look at the breakevens and the returns on the follow-on investment opportunities because it be a shame to buy something and pay for a lot of undeveloped reserves only to find they don't rank in your portfolio when you do your annual budget. And so we make sure we're testing to say that the returns are going to be durable and that these are things that are going to attract capital going forward. And also important for us now keeping the oil and the gas mix, somewhere close to 50-50, improving our cash margins, lowering our effective tax rate or drivers and then making sure we're maintaining that investment-grade balance sheet, which was it's hard to get. And once you get it, you don't want to lose it.
Lydia Rainforth
analystYes. When -- if I'm going to go into the LLOG side, a little bit difficult because not just if I think about there's a lot to different parts of the portfolio, you talked about for us to get into in a bit. But I'd like to spend a bit of a time there. Now you have the assets and most importantly, the people, what has pleasantly surprised you?
Linda Cook
executiveI would say there's no pleasant surprises because we expected it all, and it's all been good, and we expected good. So the people are fantastic. We knew that going in. They had a great reputation in the Gulf. They have, I think, the best exploration track record over the last 10 years in the Gulf of America. I think they've been responsible for 1/3 of the discoveries in the last 10 years. They've proven ability to develop deepwater projects. They have a good set of partners and relationships with their partners. They have a good portfolio of follow-on investment opportunities, so near infrastructure developments to lead to filling up the existing infrastructure. We've had success already in the last 2 licensing rounds in the U.S. that have taken place since we've completed the acquisition that we've been pleased with that, and has all given us enough confidence to make the decision to pick up a second rig, which just showed up and now under our control, I think, in the last few days, and we should be spudding our first well with that second rig here in the coming weeks. So -- so good so far. And the integration has been relatively smooth. We're used to integrating acquisitions. This one was relatively easy because it was a single country acquisition in a country where we had no existing staff or organization. So there was nothing in the country to integrate it with. And we took the existing team intact as they were. And all we had to do is kind of build the interface between them and our London headquarters from a financial reporting controls certain corporate standards and policy standpoint. So relatively easy and so far, so good.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd so, we should be watching that well, sort of to see what happened with that one.
Linda Cook
executiveYes, the first well one the second rig is called King's Road and happens to be an exploration well. So we're always...
Lydia Rainforth
analyst[indiscernible]
Linda Cook
executiveThere's nothing more exciting, right, in our industry than drilling an exploration well, I think getting the phone call in the middle of the night...
Lydia Rainforth
analystWe shall watch that we're keeping eye on that one. And we are in the U.S. So I do have to ask what are your thoughts on a U.S. listing? And you do now have U.S. production. We kind of -- we've added that there, this will become more Americas focused through time. So what are your thoughts there?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. We get the question. We've had it in every meeting so far today that we found at this conference and it comes up in almost every investor meeting. And I understand the drivers for the question that all the data shows, similar companies trade better and that they're listed in the U.S. and in the U.K. And there are -- and we've looked at the case studies of companies that were U.K. listed and have moved their listing to the U.S. And I think what most of them have in common is that they have a large base of operations in the U.S. before they made that move. And until February of this year, we didn't have assets in the U.S. So we now can check that box with a little checkmark maybe. Today, it's just around 35,000 barrels a day out of a portfolio of 500,000. So I wouldn't say it's necessarily a huge center of gravity for us yet. But as you mentioned, as our production in our U.K. declined, and we shift more investment to the western side of the Atlantic, our center of gravity is moving west. And I think as that happens, it becomes more and more viable of an opportunity or at least something for us to consider.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd I get -- obviously, we talked a lot about the U.S., and I've tried to focus on the U.S. because we're here. But there are a lot of contributors to Harbour as a whole. And I do want to spend a bit of time on the operational performance because it has been exceptional, actually. And with the 2Q results, the team listed the guidance again coming through. So can you just talk us through where we are on current guidance? And what has been behind the strength and performance for you?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. It's -- my hats off to the team, and I'm really proud of the team that we've built in Harbour Energy, and they've done a phenomenal job from an operations standpoint. A lot of people start -- when they start a new oil and gas company, they focus on non-op because it's easier. Again, we did something about it, we decided to take the opposite approach with harder road but we felt like having operational control was important, and I'm really proud of the track record that the team has established in terms of reliability and efficiency and the targets we've set for ourselves around greenhouse gas emissions and our safety performance. And first half of this year was no exception from that. We had extremely high reliability, in particular, across our operated assets around the globe. We've delivered some new developments in Norway ahead of schedule, and we completed the LLOG acquisition a bit sooner than we had anticipated. So the combination of all of those things led us to be able to upgrade our production guidance at mid-year to 490,000 to 500,000 barrels a day, which was fantastic. And then we also give guidance for free cash flow, and we were able to upgrade that this improvement was a little bit more startling, I think are impactful. At the beginning of the year, if you think back to where we all were in January and February, other than you, most people were saying that the bottom was going to fall out of oil prices at the time. And we had a conservative -- like everyone did a relatively conservative outlook for commodity prices for 2026, and we established our first free cash flow guidance for this year at $600 million. At our midyear results, we upgraded that to $1.8 billion. So we tripled it with the combination of the good operational performance that we saw and the upgrade to our production outlook, but also, of course, the tailwinds created from what commodity prices have done over the last 6 months. So the combination of those two things. If we use the -- I was saying earlier today, if we use today's forward curve, and I realize it's not right. If we use the forward curve from sometime last week, instead of $1.8 billion free cash flow this year instead will be around $2.3 billion or upwards of $2.3 billion. So we're quite leveraged to that. And it's quite exciting for us on a number of fronts, both from standpoint of shareholder distributions and the ability to pay down debt.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd those are extraordinary numbers, when you think about where you were at the start of the year to what you've been able to do is actually quite remarkable. So yes, we get that to achieve that. And just part of our -- I'm going to bring back a little bit to the operational side and because Harbour is a very different scale company to what it was even 2, 3 years ago, whether it was Wintershall DEA, the LLOG side, have you and the team have to change how you run things internally within that?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. I mean, of course, we did from going -- from being a single-country company to now having 5 core countries. In particular, I've had to break down and bring in a COO because I can't do it all myself even though I would like to, but he's fantastic. So that gives us additional executive capacity. But I'd have to say nearly everyone on our senior team that we've built like myself, spent a lot of their career at global oil and gas companies, if not major oil and gas companies. And so we're actually used to running and managing more diverse global portfolios. And it's funny because when I thought about this particular point, what comes to mind is actually what I find harder is making sure that we don't turn ourselves into a mini major by implementing too many global processes and controls and introducing unnecessary bureaucracy. So I probably spend more time making sure we're keeping ourselves lean and nimble, letting the individual country business units get after what they can get after best and us staying out of their way, but providing them support and making sure the necessary, but only the necessary controls are in place. So it's a balance between the two.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd that idea of sharing things across great and best practice. It allows you to do a little bit of that.
Linda Cook
executiveYes. We focus a lot on that. We get the business unit leaders and technical teams together regularly. We've already had people from Covington, Louisiana, where our LLOG operation, our U.S. Gulf operations run out of in Aberdeen, people in Aberdeen there, we're sharing ideas across between Gulf of America and Mexico or offshore Mexico projects. And in particular, when it comes to working with supply chain on projects in both just across the country line in the Gulf. I think there's a lot of synergies we can get as we go to our developments in Mexico by working with contractors across both jurisdictions. So I think we'll get and continue to get a lot of benefit out of that.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd you did touch on Aberdeen there. And in the U.K. it's been an area of operational performance for you, which is on the one hand, a really good sign. But the fiscal regime stability in the overall environment is still challenging. So how are you thinking about that U.K. business? Obviously, you talked about the EPL changes, and how it sits within the Harbour portfolio, particularly given the Waldorf acquisition?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. So it is a shame given the changes there to the fiscal regime but we deal with the cards that were there. We play the cards that were dealt. And so while we continue to lobby the government for -- to accelerate a change to a more sensible fiscal framework because it's coming, it's just not coming until 2030. We continue to advocate to bring that forward. But while there's not necessarily any real signs of that happening, we continue to do everything we can on the self-help front. And so the team does a fantastic job there. on the cost structure, we've been able to drive cost down from, I think, they were $20 a barrel 3 or 4 years ago. They were $18 last year, and our aim is to keep them there, if not lower, as long as we can. That gets harder and harder to do as you pull CapEx, pull investment out of the country and take your cash flow and invest it elsewhere. But they're doing what they can, means production will continue to decline for us in the country. And we're taking the cash flow and we're reinvesting it into countries where the tax rate is more favorable. And because of that, we have higher return opportunities. It's a difficult thing to do, but that's the role the U.K. plays for us today, is continue to get as much cash flow as we can out of the existing assets, and we can redeploy it elsewhere.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd that links a little bit back to the point earlier, actually creating a business that has lower tax and lower cost ultimately...
Linda Cook
executiveYes. So if we think about our production outlook going forward, we think we can keep production relatively flat at around 0.5 million barrels per day for the next several years with our existing portfolio. But that is happening while the U.K. production is declining. So that means we're replacing that with growth in production from the U.S., where we just picked up the second rig. So we'll have accelerated growth from there over time. Projects in Mexico, additional growth in Argentina as well.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd actually, watch Argentina. It is one of the areas that I am most excited about specially, monetization of that 2P [indiscernible] is actually, I think, a key catalyst for you. So can you just talk about the progress that you've made so far in Argentina and what we should be looking for as we go through the next 12 months?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. So we're quite excited about Argentina, I think everybody who's there is excited about it at this point in time, it's hard not to drink the Kool-Aid, if you will, while you're there. But hopefully, we are pretty clear eyed about it all, and we're keeping our size of our investment there. Is kind of the right scale for a company of our size. So what we have today is about 70,000 barrels per day of conventional -- mostly conventional production. The majority of it is coming from conventional producing assets offshore Tierra del Fuego natural gas that feeds the domestic gas market. And in addition to that, and that goes really well. It's Total operated. The team there does a fantastic job bringing new existing discoveries on stream in order to keep the existing infrastructure full. So kind of a high return, good margin business. But the exciting part in the future is all around Vaca Muerta. And we have an interest in two really large licenses and oil license in the heart of the oil fairway, and we're in the final stages of negotiating the terms around that unconventional license with the local government. And once that's finalized, hopefully, in the coming weeks, we'll be picking -- the plan is to pick up a rig and start drilling in the oil fairway of the Vaca Muerta early next year. So that will be a big new milestone for us and something we're excited about. And then second, our second license in the Vaca Muerta is in the gas fairway, we already have a 1-rig program going there now. The gas is going into the domestic market. Wells are getting cheaper to -- every well we drill is getting cheaper and better than the well before. So the learning curve with in the U.S. is alive and well in Argentina and more and more contractors are showing up with more and better equipment. Infrastructure is being built, new oil pipelines under construction or new gas pipelines under construction. So that's happening. And in addition, the first of what will be to at least 2 LNG projects in the country is under construction. We have a 15% stake in it. It's called Southern Energy LNG, it will consist of 2 leased Golar Floating LNG, vessels, total of 6 million tonnes per annum. And as I said, we have a 15% stake. And why that's important for us is it gives us access to global gas markets for our gas instead of being confined to what the Argentinian gas market needs. And it enables us to -- we've applied for the project to be qualified under what's called the RIGI investment incentive regime and it was approved. So this is a big package of investment incentives. And in addition to the tax breaks, you're able to keep your revenues from the project offshore. So when you hear about people in the past getting burned in Argentina because they generate a lot of revenue in the country and they're unable to give -- get it out without taking a big discount on the exchange rate. If you're qualified under the RIGI, you can keep your revenues, which for us on the LNG project will be in U.S. dollars to be able to keep those out of the country and we reduce that sort of country risk that some people might think about when they think about Argentina. So a lot of milestones coming up and a lot of things we're really excited about.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd just -- I think just listening to you now is the idea of obviously, we've got LLOG with the growth coming through. We've got Argentina with growth coming through. This is really setting up for growth in free cash flow towards the end of the decade, I guess, coming, exactly. But the other part, and I want to say in Latin America, is Mexico because obviously, that's again a big growth area for you with Zama and Kan. So can you just talk through where we are on that now?
Linda Cook
executiveYes, we have 2 discoveries in Mexico that we're now the proud operators of, which wasn't the case before. But we picked up interest in both through coincidentally, two different acquisitions that came as packages so that together, we're now the biggest private interest holder in both of those projects. We have a 70% interest in Kan, and we have a 27% interest in Zama. Zama is the largest undeveloped discovery in Mexico, it's shallow water, oil. Both of these are oil and both are in shallow water. And in Zama, we have Pemex also as our partner. And Pemex was the operator until late last year when they agreed to transfer operatorship to Harbour. Both projects are making some good progress now. We're about to enter FEED in both of them. And if all goes according to plan, both will be FID ready towards the end of next year. And then we'll see once we get final cost estimates in to understand what the schedule really looks like. Hopefully, then we'll be able to take positive investment decisions. But for us, these are big projects, in total, almost 350 million barrels of reserves harbor share across both of those projects together, developing them simultaneously or in close timing with each other allows us to capture some synergies, in particular, through the contracting strategy. We have a common partner in Grupo Carso in both of those projects, that's the Carlos Slim upstream oil and gas sort of entity there in Mexico. So a really strong aligned and well connected partner there. And then we also have Talos as a partner in Zama. So really strong partnerships as well that we're excited about.
Lydia Rainforth
analystThere is that idea of free cash flow growth and being able to go out towards the end of the decade. But if I bring all of this together, you've got a very solid production base and really resources in place. Where ultimately do you want to take Harbour going forward? Is it harder in the current macro environment as well? Because obviously, it gives a lot of cash flow, but it gives you a lot of choices.
Linda Cook
executiveYes. If you're talking about M&A, definitely harder in the current macro environment. And we have tried and fairly successfully to avoid buying high, if you will. I think what we feel good about, though, is that with the portfolio we have today, we are able to keep production flat organically, and we don't rely on our need to go out and do an acquisition right now, because of the strength of the existing portfolio. So we really like that. And there are a lot of catalysts coming towards us in the next 1.5 years that are going to help keep us that way. And I've talked about a lot of more projects coming on stream in Norway, 1- and 2-well tiebacks, multiples of them in the pipeline, the second rig in the U.S. Gulf, the projects in Mexico heading to FID and then the opportunities we have in Argentina are all very exciting. We want to keep the investment grade rating on our credit. Again, really important for us. We like to keep a mix of oil and gas that feels good to us. If we could dial it a bit back more towards oil. And I think that will naturally happen as we grow production in the U.S. and then bring the Mexico projects on stream because all of those are oil. So I think that happens will happen naturally or organically at least. So yes, just continuing to maintain our position as a global diversified independent 0.5 million barrels per day, investment-grade credit rating, distributing a lot of cash to our shareholders.
Lydia Rainforth
analystI think the idea of being an international E&P actually with a view of this sort of scale, I think, is important. And you touched on it right at the end there, the idea of the $1.8 billion of free cash flow guidance at the half year mark to market, $2.3 billion. What do you do with all the cash?
Linda Cook
executiveYes, it's a good question. I think we have a good answer for it. I think there are 3 things we could do. We could increase CapEx, and I don't think that's the right thing for us to do. At this point in time, we have a team. They need to stay focused on what we're doing now, and we want to avoid that sort of knee-jerk reaction to changing your CapEx plans just because commodity prices might be higher or lower for 1 year to the next. So the other options we have are to return it to shareholders and pay down debt and our plan is to do both of those. So with the $2.3 billion, if that's where we end up this year, we have a shareholder distribution policy that we recently put in place that aims to -- or that says we will pay out 45% to 75% of our free cash flow to shareholders each year. And where we land in that range will depend on where we are with leverage and debt levels. And having just completed the LLOG transaction earlier this year, our feeling now is we need to have a priority around debt reduction. So it's likely that for the full year, we'll be paying out towards the lower end of that range, precisely where? I don't know. But if you think of, let's use 50% because it's around number $2.3 billion. It means $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion will go to our shareholders. And then we'll be able to make a big dent in our debt using the balance of it to pay down debt. We had $5.4 billion of net debt at mid-year being able to apply $1 billion to $1.2 billion or $1.3 billion against that feels like really good progress on that front. Then on the shareholder distribution, $1.1 billion, we have a commitment to a dividend of at least $300 million. So we'll for sure do that. That leaves $800 million after that. We've already approved a $250 million buyback. So that takes us to $550 million. So we have another $550 million to decide what to do with. I think, for those of you who are familiar with Harbour, now we have a major shareholder in BASF, the chemical company. They were major shareholders in Wintershall DEA. And so as a result of that transaction, they ended up with a stake in Harbour. And they own 47% of the company at the beginning of the year. We now already have them down to 24%. So their stated intention to exit is now happening, which feels good for us because it was -- everyone was sort of waiting investors, in particular, we're waiting to see when and how that was going to take place. So through 3 different transactions, we have them now down to 24%. Hopefully, they'll continue on that journey. But as they are executing their exit from the company. Being in the market with buybacks or having the firepower for buybacks and/or to the possibility of buying shares directly from them is also out there. And so I think that's sort of what makes sense for us in the near term.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAnd I think actually having them down further would be helpful as well. And I'm conscious of time. And Linda, this always happens we go far too quickly and there's a lot of things we haven't touched on. But if I can just go back to -- what your key message is for investors here in New York. If you want one thing for us to take away today?
Linda Cook
executiveYes. I think it's a good time to think about investing in Harbour. What we hear from U.S. investors is that they're -- now that the U.S. onshore shale play has matured, they're looking at where to invest next. There aren't many companies like Harbour that have scale, investment-grade balance sheet and that good exposure to both Brent and European gas prices. And I think there's still room to run on European gas, and it may run for a while. And we have a proven -- the team has a proven track record of executing and delivering and operating well. And so I think we're worth taking a look at.
Lydia Rainforth
analystAbsolutely, I cannot agree more. For me, there's a lot of upside potential there. And that's a brilliant way for us to end the session. And Linda, thank you very, very much, and thank you for everyone for coming.
Linda Cook
executiveGreat. Thanks, Lydia.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Harbour Energy plc transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Harbour Energy plc earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.