hGears AG (HGEA.DE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
November 11, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, welcome to the hGear's 9 Months Results 2025 Conference Call. I am a Moira, the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] The conference has been recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Christian Weiz, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Christian Weiz
executiveGood morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for hGear's 9 Months 2025 Results Conference Call and Webcast. My name is Christian Weiz, I'm the Head of Investor Relations. Joining me on the call today are Sven Arend, our CEO; and Daniel Basok, our CFO. They will take you through our 9 months results, and we'll be happy to answer your questions during the Q&A session afterwards. The earnings materials are available on the Investor Relations section of our website, should you not have received them yet. Before we begin, I would like to draw your attention to the disclaimer on Slide 2, which outlines the legal framework under which this presentation must be considered and which I will assume you have read. And with that, I'm pleased to hand over the call to Sven Arend, our CEO.
Sven Arend
executiveThanks, Christian, and good morning, everyone, and welcome also from my side to our 9 Months 2025 Earnings Call. As expected, the economic environment and the overall trends in our industries have not improved, and we continue to operate in a difficult market. Despite this, we managed to improve our profitability. Due to the fact that we brought forward production in the first half of the year, we recorded the weakest performance in the company's history in the third quarter of 2025. But thanks to this tactical shift in production, we were able to increase efficiencies and together with additional cost measures, this had a positive impact on our 9 months profitability. Even though e-Tools recorded a decline in the quarter, the overall recovery and stabilization of the business area continues. E-Mobility is benefiting from renewed demand for conventional engine technologies, and we continue to benefit from the resilience of the luxury and sports car segment. As anticipated, e-Bike was very weak, mainly because revenues had been pulled forward into the first half of the year, while destocking is still ongoing. Our efforts to streamline structures and reduce costs increasingly bad fruit. In fact, they more than offset the effects of the missing operational leverage and the weaker mix. As a result, we were able to raise our 2025 guidance in October. We now expect revenues to come in at the upper end of the previously given range and a better EBITDA landing in a minus EUR 1 million to plus EUR 1 million range. Consequently, we also anticipate a better free cash flow between minus EUR 1 million and 0. This positive development also supported our efforts to preserve cash and liquidity, which is and remains our highest priority. Daniel will explain in more detail what we have achieved here. Let's turn to Slide 4 to take a look at hGear's business area sales performance in the first 9 months of this year. On Slide 4, you can see the sales performance of the different business areas since 2023. E-Bike, as anticipated, was very weak, mainly because of revenues that we had pulled forward into the first half of the year and that were therefore missing in the third quarter. At the same time, demand in the third quarter remained low as expected since the destocking is still ongoing. We continue to see mixed signals from the end market, which seem to indicate that the stock depletion has progressed in recent months, and it may be close to an end. Our observations suggest that we have likely seen the trough and may, and I repeat may, experienced some acceleration during 2026. Meanwhile, E-Mobility is benefiting from renewed demand for smaller diesel and petrol engines as a kind of reality check has set in among consumers regarding the challenges in the transition to the electric mobility, especially in the small car segment. As a result, path for conventional engines, which in the past were insignificant part of our e-Mobility business area in which we thought would gradually phase out are once again in high demand. And as in previous quarters, we continue to benefit from the resilience of the luxury and sports car segment. Even though e-Tools recorded a decline in the quarter, the overall recovery and stabilization of the business area continues. The lower sales in the third quarter are also partly due to anticipated volumes that were shifted to the second quarter as several customers increased their safety stock levels to mitigate uncertainties related to the ongoing trade tensions between China and the U.S. We've covered the key highlights, and now it's time for the numbers. And for that, I will hand over to Daniel for some additional color on the 9-month results and the main reasons behind our upgraded guidance for 2025.
Daniel Basok
executiveThanks, Sven, and good morning, everyone. As you've just heard, the numbers are quite encouraging this time. So let's take a closer look and start with Slide 6. Sales for the first 9 months of 2025 totaled to EUR 69.6 million, a decrease of 3.8% compared with EUR 72.1 million in the prior year. Third quarter sales declined by 8.4% year-on-year and by 17% sequentially. Following the full forward of sales into the first half of the year, it came as no surprise to us that the e-Bike business had to digest an anticipated drop of 81.2% in the third quarter year-over-year, while the decline for the first 9 months of 2025 was 42.7%. As we repeatedly said, this reflects the ongoing stock depletion. However, we are seeing signs that the trough has been reached. The EUR 100 million question, of course, remains is when and to what extent we will see the recovery of the e-Bike industry in 2026. While there are still initial indications that the market may have bottomed out, it is still too early to assess the pace and the trajectory of this recovery. E-Mobility recorded in the first 9 months of 2025, 4.1% higher sales in the year-over-year comparison, as the business area added 22.9% in the third quarter compared with the previous year. And as Sven said earlier, e-Mobility benefits of a revival in demand for smaller cars with conventional combustion engines. Besides that, the business area benefits of stable demand from the luxury and sports car segment. And we are quite confident with regards to the medium- to long-term prospects here as we continue to get nominations for a lot of projects in this business area. E-Tools continued to stabilize in the period under review. Although the business had to digest an 8.5% drop in the third quarter. Still, over the first 9 months, this business area grew nicely by 9%. Growth was again driven by gardening tools but power tools showed some weakness, which is not surprising considering that manufacturing and construction markets in the western world, apart from the innovation and refurbishment, remains soft. Meanwhile, existing and potential U.S. trade tariffs through many threat and console the expansion of the business area. Now turning to the middle chart, you can see our gross profit and gross profit margin. The adjusted gross profit amounted to EUR 31.8 million, down 5.7% or EUR 1.9 million year-on-year. This decline mainly reflects 3.8% or EUR 2.8 million decline in revenues, and the noticeably softer sales mix with e-Tools, the business area with lowest gross profit margins, accounting for 37.4% of sales compared to 33% in the prior year. The adjusted gross profit margin declined by 90 basis points year-on-year to 45.6% for the first 9 months, remaining exactly at the margin level of the first half of the year. This stability through the year came despite a softer sales mix, which could be cushioned by a few one-off effects such as tooling contribution and price adjustments. And now last but not least, the chart on the right highlights adjusted EBITDA and margin development. Despite the decline in revenues of EUR 2.5 million with software mix, which resulted in a decline in gross profit of EUR 1.9 million, the adjusted EBITDA improved to EUR 0.9 million in the first 9 months of 2025, more than double last year's figure. This tangible improvement underlines the effectiveness of our cost saving measures and confirms that the structural actions we implemented are delivering evident results. This improvement was primarily driven by savings of around EUR 1.9 million in adjusted personnel expenses and an additional EUR 0.5 million reduction in OpEx. While current volumes continue to limit operational leverage, our results clearly demonstrates the positive effect of our structural improvement and disciplined cost saving measures. Most of the major savings have already been implemented, and we are proud of this progress. Nonetheless, we are from declaring victory just yet, and we continue to identify opportunities for further efficiency gains. The next slide covers free cash flow and working capital. So please let's flip to Slide 7. So this slide shows the key elements that drove our free cash flow in the first 9 months of 2025 compared to the same period a year ago. Let's start talking about the free cash flow. Cash flow from operating activities improved in the first 9 months, mainly driven by stronger nonadjusted EBITDA, up EUR 1.5 million year-on-year and by lower inventories. These positive effects were partly offset by a temporary increase in receivables, reflecting timing effects such as increased sales towards the quarter end. CapEx in the 9 months of 2025 was EUR 1 million lower year-on-year, reflecting the one-off effect from a successful sale and leaseback transaction, but also our disciplined investment approach. After cleaning the one-off effects, net cash flow for investment activities this year is higher than a year ago, but still below the 3% of sales CapEx threshold. Free cash flow ultimately came in at minus EUR 0.6 million, a significant improvement compared to minus EUR 2.5 million last year. This represents a solid achievement given the current trading conditions and challenging market environment. The chart below illustrates the development of our working capital, which decreased from EUR 9 million in the previous year to EUR 8.1 million at the end of the third quarter of 2025. The almost 10% decline in the net working capital once again outpaced the 3.9% decline in revenues. Therefore, working capital declined to 8.7% of LTM revenues compared with 8.9% a year earlier. The reduction in working capital primarily reflects our continued efforts to lower inventories and thereby, ease the pressure on operating cash flow and to further optimize the balance sheet. And speaking about the balance sheet, let's turn to Slide 8, where I would like to give some highlights and some few more details. So the net debt decreased by EUR 2.5 million compared to the half year '25 , mainly due to the selling leaseback transaction that resulted in increase of long-term lease liabilities. As a result, the leverage ratio went up slightly but remained below the peak seen in earlier quarters. We expect this ratio to improve significantly as soon as volumes recover and higher activity level will lead to operational leverage and directly support profitability and adjusted EBITDA. Cash and cash equivalents stood at EUR 8.7 million at the end of September. And when adding the EUR 2 million of undrawn credit lines represent EUR 10.7 million in a like-for-like comparison. The current level of liquidity remains adequate and aligned with our focus on disciplined and efficient liquidity management. The equity ratio stood at 45.1% at the end of the 9 months as of 2025 compared to 49.4% at year-end. This capital base provides us with the flexibility to manage the current challenges and be ready to accelerate once market conditions improve. Now over to Sven, where he has the pleasure of guiding you through the outlook and the closing remarks before we open the line for your questions.
Sven Arend
executiveThanks, Daniel. Let me sum up before we move on to the Q&A. Let's start with the business areas. Yes, we saw a decline in third quarter in e-Tools, but the overall stabilization trend remains and the business remains intact. E-Mobility continues to benefit from our broad product portfolio serving both conventional and electric vehicle production. In the European bicycle industry, stock depletion appears to be coming to an end, and there are encouraging signs that we may have passed the trough suggesting that a gradual recovery could start to take shape over the course of 2026. Meanwhile, our 9 months results clearly show that the structural adjustments and cost measures implemented in recent quarters are successful and are paying off. The better-than-anticipated development of our numbers even led us to raise our guidance in October 2025 through an ad hoc announcement, which you may have seen. Our outlook reflects higher profitability and better cash preservation, confirming that our measures are having a lasting impact. So to repeat it from the ad hoc we issued on the 23rd of October for 2025, we expect group revenues of EUR 87 million to EUR 90 million, an adjusted EBITDA of minus EUR 1 million to plus EUR 1 million and a free cash flow of minus EUR 2 million to 0. This concludes our review of the first 9 months of 2025, and I will now hand back to the operator to open the line for your questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of -- from Martijn den Drijver from ABN AMRO ODDO BHF.
Unknown Analyst
analystThis is Sam actually speaking from ABN AMRO. I will be taking over from Martin. My few set of questions at the start. Starting from e-Mobility driver, the Q3 was very strong on a quarterly basis, around 30% up. Do you think this is sustainable going forward into Q4 and 2026? My second question would be on e-Tools. Do you, in general, see tariffs as a key factor affecting the segment? So let's start from the first 2 questions, if I may.
Sven Arend
executiveLet me start with e-Tools. I think in the end, obviously, we've been monitoring that very closely, where quite a lot of the business that we produce actually gets shipped versus the United States. But what has to be said is that until now, apart from maybe some pulling up and then later on some reductions, we do not see any changes. All discussions with our customers point to a very stable and solid future. So we currently, right now, do not see this whole tariff discussion affecting volumes on our side. And in fact, we see some opportunities even to hopefully grow the business in the years to come. On the e-Mobility side, I think we see overall on an annual basis, a stable situation. There may be some quarterly changes and adjustments, but I would not factor those in for the future. But I think overall, it's a stable business where we also see the opportunity to grow. The 1 thing that always has to be said when we talk about e-Mobility that typically the time from nomination to actually seeing the bottom line as an SOP is going to be somewhere between 2 to 4.5 years. So despite all the success we've had there, we do not see a lot of that on the bottom line yet. We do have a stable order book for the remainder of the year, which honestly is also a good sign because we typically, a lot of times throughout the year in Q4, see stock cleanups at the customer end, and I would say this is the first time in the 3 years that I've been here that we've not seen those reductions at least until now.
Unknown Analyst
analystVery grateful. Just another question on the e-Tools part. Do you see some effect on pricing also because of tariffs? Or is there also no risk? How you indicated there's no risk on volumes, but on pricing also, if I understand no risk would that imply?
Sven Arend
executiveNo, we've not had any pricing discussions as a result of the tariffs. And in fact, again, we have been nominated with some follow-up generations that will secure this business over the years to come without really seeing any changes on price pressure or volume changes.
Unknown Analyst
analystAll right. Very clear. And if I may just squeeze in 1 or 2 more questions. Firstly, with regards to the e-Bike bottoming. So you've indicated that the destocking is probably approaching its end. Firstly, what signals do you concretely use? Is it the OEM feedback? Is it the inventory levels? Could you just provide some color there, like as to which signals are particularly pointing towards more or of a trough or destocking finishing?
Sven Arend
executiveIf you look at the official numbers of companies like Shimano and Giant, you basically see that they see slight signs of recovery. But we also, from our customers and from bike manufacturers hear that the stock that they see at their customers is going down and going down quite significantly. That makes us believe that over the course of the next, I would say, 3 to 9 months, we should, for all these customers reach a normal stock level that is required to keep flexibility. The 1 thing that, yes, it maybe has been missing yet is that we see the bottom line numbers in the call offs change, but that should be the consequence of that once we reach that point.
Unknown Analyst
analystVery grateful. It's very clear on that part. And maybe 1 current last question and then I will go into the queue. Just with regards to automotive segment market, so the Tier 1 customers, they remain stable. Do you see any risk going forward? You have indicated that the order book remains strong. But the auto sector is going through some headwinds. Do you see that somewhere? Or for you, it's not a concern?
Sven Arend
executiveHonestly, we have had some -- I mean, some slowdowns in some products. I mean, to be fair, we were affected by 1 manufacturer that is not part of the EU that was hit by a software attack and stock production. So we've seen some slight declines there. But I think overall, what we do see is that, especially on the conventional side, I mean, if you look at publications, for example, right now, Volkswagen is doing short time for all the models that are electric, but they're doing over time on the models that are combustion. So as we tried to explain, at least for the time being, what we do see is a bit of a revival on the conventional side. And then I think, obviously, we are also on the luxury end that has been extremely stable and will continue to be so. And I think then on the new product introduction, yes, we've mentioned that in the past. There have been some delays on model launches and adjustments. But I think overall, with regards to what we factored into our planning, we do not see any significant risk.
Unknown Analyst
analystVery grateful. Maybe last question currently would be CapEx. There is, let's say, a leaseback transaction done this year. I know it's a bit early to ask, but what do you foresee for next year? Do you see more support from CapEx side for the free cash flow? Or do you see it turning around? Any indication for next year on this?
Daniel Basok
executiveYes. Currently, what we expect for next year is that basically -- in the last few years, we went through a big CapEx cycle, and we build up capacities on our plans. And we currently targeting to maintain the CapEx level to be below 3% of our total sales, which is basically represents our maintenance CapEx. That will be also the targets going forward for the next years as long as we will not see a recovery or a significant recovery in our top line. That being said, there are a few projects that are always in the pipeline and when you're basically always missing the 1 machine that you don't have and what we are currently trying to do and we'll continue to do in the future is that for that machine, we are trying to reduce the capacity of the machines that we have that we don't need and partially financed with the disposal of existing equipment, the next machine that we need for a new project. But the target still remains to be below 3% of total sales and revenues.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Fabio Holscher from Warburg Research.
Fabio Holscher
analystI have a couple left. I'll take them 1 by 1. I'll start chronic logically, with the guidance, did the guidance change imply that your expectations for 2026 have changed in any way as well?
Daniel Basok
executiveAs we haven't provided any guidance for 2026, we -- our expectations, of course, towards 2026 has changed also based on what we see now, especially on the terms of profitability. As you can see from the updated guidance that we published in October, the top line hasn't changed, but we slightly increased the profitability of the business just due to the fact that we see that our cost measures that were planned for this year, we were able to implement them a little bit earlier and with a slightly broader effect than what we have originally anticipated. And that is also something that provides us the confidence that we need for 2026 or higher confidence that we have now for 2026 in terms of profitability.
Fabio Holscher
analystOkay. Great. And then I want to come back to the e-Mobility segment or automotive. You mentioned the drivers this year so far and for the future. Do you see any angles for additional on-top growth going forward in e-Mobility or even conventional powertrains beyond the business you're currently doing, for example, in China with Chinese OEMs, for example, given you have a site in the country?
Sven Arend
executiveDefinitely. But like as mentioned, even in China, even though the development cycles are shorter, you will talk about 1.5 to 2.5 years in China and typically around 2 to 4 years in Europe before you really see that hit the bottom line. But we've secured quite a few projects over the last 2 years with new customers, new projects. Again, the bad thing about the automotive business is it's relatively slow until it hits the bottom line. And I think as we mentioned in the past, especially in Europe with the consolidation and reassessment of the whole e-Mobility strategy, quite a few of these projects were also delayed from their original target so that they're actually going to hit the bottom line somewhere in '26, '27, '28.
Fabio Holscher
analystOkay. Great. And then another more strategic one, perhaps, Sven. When you joined hGears, especially in the early days, you mentioned how you want to diversify and grow in adjacent industries. I mean, market conditions have obviously changed in the meantime, but 1 could argue that the cyclical weakness exposed even more than need to diversify. I remember in the past, you were mentioning med tech, although that's perhaps not the easiest market to enter. We're seeing others going more into robotics. Energy is an option. Any angles you see there to get the top line up beyond the current cyclical recovery that we're all hoping for?
Sven Arend
executiveFrom hGears fan, we're addressing these areas. We have had some small successes on things like packaging industry and industrial. We are, in the end, following the whole development on the robotics side, though, I would say, especially at the higher end, right now, the volumes in the end do not provide significant revenue potential, and it's still a very fragmented market. I think the key thing is that we're trying to get an alignment with some -- with companies that we believe could be key players, at least in the professional area of the business going forward to work on opportunities there. Again, it's not something that I see hitting the bottom line very quickly. I think in the end, we mentioned that also in the past, being a highly established player in the 3 industries that we're in, it's a lot of times easier to find new business. And of course, the automotive business still when you look at overall industries, provide the highest volume potential in there for the quickest way of adding revenue. There, I would say things are going well. But again, for the short term, things -- in some cases, we've also had on automotive, short-term prospects. Some of these businesses came in, in the last 2 years, and we will continue to work on that. But yes, the focus is also to take a look at things like industrial. We even had discussions with defense. We'll have to say that there, again, volumes aren't very high. If you really want to get into it and into defense products that are covered by the confidentiality topics, we would have to significantly invest into infrastructure and certification for these products here. So I see that, for example, providing limited scope in the next year or 2.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] There are no more questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Sven Arend for any closing remarks.
Sven Arend
executiveRight. So let me thank everybody for joining this call. Some of you we will speak to later in individual calls, and we look forward to updating all of you in our next publication and all the best until then. Thank you, and bye.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the call.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete hGears AG transcript — plus 246,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to hGears AG earnings transcripts and 246,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.