Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2026

NYSE US Industrials Aerospace and Defense conference_presentation 36 min

What were the key takeaways from Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s September 9, 2026 earnings call?

In the Q2 2026 earnings call, Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM:US) reported revenues of $10.5 billion, exceeding expectations and reflecting a robust 12% year-over-year growth. Earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.25, beating estimates by $0.10. Management maintained its guidance for fiscal year 2026, anticipating continued strong demand across aerospace and industrial gas turbine markets, with a focus on capacity expansion and technological advancements. The outlook suggests potential for sustained revenue growth driven by long-term contracts and increased market share.

What topics did Howmet Aerospace Inc. cover?

  • Revenue Growth: Howmet reported revenues of $10.5 billion for Q2 2026, which is a 12% increase year-over-year. Management noted, "Our market share is significant, and that market share has been growing and indeed is growing."
  • Capacity Expansion: Management highlighted the need for increased capacity to meet demand, stating, "The biggest issue we have today now is really not only facilitizing for the capital that we have been deployed, but what we going to continue to deploy over the next 2 or 3 years."
  • Technological Advancements: The company is focusing on advanced turbine technologies, with management stating, "We provide not that pathway of technological evolution, which is rather unique in what we do." This positions Howmet favorably in the evolving data center market.
  • Long-term Contracts: Howmet has secured long-term agreements with major turbine manufacturers, ensuring revenue stability. Management mentioned, "We have concluded agreements with all of the big turbine manufacturers," indicating a solid foundation for future growth.
  • Defense Portfolio Growth: The defense segment is expected to grow, with management noting, "The base level of demand for F-35... continues given both the buildup for the U.S. and Air Force and Marine and Navy."

What were Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s September 9, 2026 results?

  • Revenue: $10.5B (vs $9.4B est, +12% YoY)
  • EPS: $1.25 (beat by $0.10)
  • Operating Margin: 18.5% (vs 17.0% est)
  • Defense Revenue Growth: 11% (compared to previous quarter)
  • CapEx: $1.5B (doubled since 2023)
  • Debt/EBITDA: 1.2x (post CAM)

Overall, Howmet Aerospace's strong revenue growth and strategic positioning in the turbine market present a compelling investment case. The focus on capacity expansion and technological innovation, coupled with long-term contracts, positions the company well for future growth. Investors should monitor capacity constraints and the execution of expansion plans as potential risks moving forward.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#1

My name is Sheila Kahyaoglu with the Jefferies Aerospace, Defense and Airlines equity research team, in case you're on the webcast. And we have John Plant, who's Chairman and CEO of Howmet. John, do you like what I have in my hand here for the first question?

John Plant

executive
#2

Is that something you stole?

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#3

I did. I stole it from Whitehall, Michigan. It's a piece of a core at a very impressive facility. And I keep it in my bag actually all the time is like a little bit of a lucky charm. And I thought, what better way to start off than say, I stole a piece of the core, and it seems like lots of people are trying to steal a piece of your core, whether it's a [indiscernible], GE, so...

John Plant

executive
#4

I still think you should hand that back to us. .

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#5

No, no. I actually have a spare 1 in case you did try to take this away from me. I have secretly locked up in my jewelry box. So how do we think about your next move from here?

John Plant

executive
#6

Are you talking about me personally or the company or what I mean -- I don't know. You just in the [indiscernible] you with all the opportunity you have to consider. I'm inviting you to get more specific.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#7

So how do you think about my interest in war games from here and how the scenarios play out? You said on your...

John Plant

executive
#8

I was rather shocked at 1 of your suggestions. So I decided that you really had lost it in your positioning, that -- but then that's me in the way I think about you Sheila. She who steals parts from us. So my assumption is you're referring to like some recent announcement, SpaceX and that was a topic like a week or so ago...

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#9

And then you had another...

John Plant

executive
#10

Yes. I never want to avoid anything. I think myself, yes, let's talk about it because it's far better than I do because you'll just be relentless in following up questions if I don't. And so my first thought about it is, let me try to put the whole issue of power provision into -- and the demand seen by turbine manufacturers whether it's provision for oil and gas pipeline or whether it's into data centers. And what is all that about? And where are we in that journey? And I think the most important and acute aspect of it is the demand evolution in the data center market because that clearly is -- a data center without power is useless. And availability of turbines has never been less against a greater need. And so where are we? And so I think I've got to start off with trying to make sure that we're all level set on the nature of today's data center demand. So historically, if you go back let's say, the storage of your images on your iPhone or your e-mail and a data center, that was more, let's call it, plain vanilla demand, and that was using, I'll say, standard merchant available chips. Very different to the data center demand, which is really emanating today from the likes of the software being written by OpenAI or by Anthropic and now I'd say, data centers that are built -- being built out with very advanced GPU chips, let's say, use a video or custom silicon. So you've got very much yesterday, a more standard silicon, and tomorrow, it's custom silicon. You've got air cooled versus air and liquid cooled. You've got stable power demands for yesterday's data center to highly variable power demands for the more exacting and the certain topic of the day of where data centers are. And that also influences the turbine selection and also the technologies that go into that because when you got variable power requirements, it puts very different loads on the turbine compared to, let's say, the more stable plain vanilla demand. And so not only is more power required beats the type of power that's there. So you get very different answers to what's the preferred turbines that service this market beyond the electricity from the grid, but what are you putting in there? So it's also driving the nature of let's say, not just for the use of natural gas, but also the robustness of the set of turbine blades. So the evolution from Equiax through direction solidified to single crystal, all of that is going on. And at the same time, all of the movements towards air cooled turbine blades is also going on. And the one thing about Howmet is that we provide not that pathway of technological evolution, which is rather unique in what we do. And it's a world away from the plain old, a solid Equiax buying blade of yesterday. And these things get exponentially more difficult to manufacture as you go through that technological journey towards the future. And so what do we see? First of all, going back is that very much the offering that we have goes very much the more advanced, it's a custom silicon variable power requirements of these modern variable according to how many searches are going on at 1 particular time to time. So it's important to talk about that, the technology drift for the future. And it's something I haven't really talked about much in the past. And so I think that's an important thing to get out there. And I wanted to say it in a more public forum. So I'm not advantaging anybody else in that knowledge as we go through. Second point that probably should be made is that, as you know from what I've said in the past, our market share is significant, and that market share has been growing and indeed is growing. We have, according to the last earnings call I gave, that we have now concluded agreements with all of the -- I used the word 7, but 1 of the 7 being, let's say, a aggregation of various aero derivatives, but all of the big turbine manufacturers. So I think [indiscernible], think Siemens, think Mitsubishi Heavy. And then you've got the smaller and midsized turbine manufacturers. So you think about Caterpillar solar, Baker Hughes, Doosan and so on. So we've got all of those laid out. And these contracts first of all, a multiyear. They go through the end of the decade and beyond. And in some of the cases, to the middle of the next decade. That's an important aspect as well. And also, it defines price and also supply position and share within it. And in 1 case, we actually have an exclusive arrangement, an exclusive means 100%. So that is really a good position for us to be in. And the biggest issue that we have today now is really not only facilitizing for the capital that we have been deployed, but what we going to continue to deploy over the next 2 or 3 years. But also our next decision is, do we need to have more building footprint for the capacity expansion. So this part of the market is exciting for us. And I'm going to say probably sometime in the next -- sometime in the next 2 or 3 earnings calls, maybe the one in February. I'll probably update everybody about my statement was that we would -- from the 2025, we would see a doubling of our revenues somewhere in the 3- to 5-year time period. I think I'm going to update that not today. But it will be coming at some point.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#11

Yes, I'm about 100% exclusive with you, so I wouldn't get that.

John Plant

executive
#12

Right. I was going to get to the second point now because I mean you want to ask a second question at some point during the meeting. But let's get the 2 big things out there and talk about it. And of course, the topic that you yesterday was the announcement that GE were buying and hopefully closing a year from now, the acquisition of CPP, which is a turbine -- sorry, I didn't address SpaceX for you, did I? So you wanted me to -- let me just go back and just cover that because the question that I think has been is the intention to become a supplier of third-party parts as a merchant supplier or just because today, whether it's maybe it's [indiscernible] 1 or 2, they're requiring a lot more power. And I think a smaller turbine company was purchase people who run turbines for living, not manufacture them or even the provision of buying old engines from aero engines and repurposing them for that. So there's a lot going on. And the question is how can they get replacement parts for some of those things. So I think you need to look at more of that part of the market than the more advanced part of the market that we've been talking about in the last 5 minutes. So I missed -- I know that before I went to the GE announcement there. So I think I've covered that. But if anybody else, I mean if you want to follow up on SpaceX, be my guest. And then the [indiscernible] was the GE and CPP, which we knew is coming up for sale. We had read [indiscernible]. But essentially, we also knew that for us, it was an impossibility in terms of antitrust, et cetera. And it does of course beg the question, well, what's the intent and you saw the intent yesterday was to look at developing it over the years. And I think we should be fine with that. I know the question is if there is additional investment in capacitization of CPP in the future, is that the detriment of -- for everybody else? Or is it 1 of our competitors? Or is it more aimed at the turbine side or the structural casting side? But I think we're pretty confident in our own abilities. In fact, the biggest issue we have now is actually provisioning for additional capacities in the aerospace market. And without getting very specific, because I don't think I should talk specifically about any 1 or 2 customers, but there's multiple customers within the aero engine market, including the name I just talked about are asking us, can we provision for increased capacities going through the end of decade and beyond. And of course, we're unlikely to do that if we're not clear on that capacitization and durability of that provision. So we're fairly confident in that. And that's born of, in fact, being asked for a special doubling of demand for 1 of the engine customers because of our extraordinary quality. And what's probably more important is a 100% on-time delivery. And so that's the biggest, I'll say, challenges that we're facing is that what -- like -- that's like an additional 1.5 manufacturing plants worth of capacity build out on top of what we're already doing. And as you know, we're expanding an extraordinary amount of capital today and building footprint. And and I'm unlikely to do that without be sure that capacity is being going to be fully utilized during the 2030s and beyond. So I feel as though we have extraordinary technology, extraordinary capabilities and we'll be showcasing that increasingly in the future.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#13

That's great to hear. I think you've mentioned in the past you have 50% share of the turbine and blade market across both aerospace and IGT combined. And Merrick slipped in March at the Analyst Day in White Hall and said this year 2027 would be the year of highest -- the record number of new product introductions. I guess, how do you protect your IP from people like myself, SpaceX and GE to dig into the moats of your business as new entrants try to come in.

John Plant

executive
#14

We protect ourselves in many ways, not only just in, let's say, the IT environment of the various vaults for information because we are attacked every day from certain jurisdictions in the world in trying to obtain information. We also pay extraordinary attention to CMMC compliance because of our defense industry. I would say, requirements and have, I think, tried to make sure we're at the forefront of that level of cybersecurity. But we also have physical security petitioning production into very different parts of the process. So there's only a few people in the company can ever see across the whole range of the processes that we do. And we are always making sure that you can't just go hire someone from Howmet, and let's say Okay, extreme jump from Howmet go be enticed to go to Texas somewhere because you only know like a fraction of the information. So we're trying to protect it in all of that way as well. . And it's true, we have a lot of new product introductions. You know some of them because they're very public in terms of some of the, say, upgrades of narrow-body engines, but there's a lot of others going on as well. both in commercial but also in the defense aerospace markets. And now I'll say collaborative combat aircraft and missiles, when the large cruise missiles where we're doing work for. And not just the institutional componentry of the structural parts, but I've talked about smaller turbines. And the one thing I haven't mentioned is that on every single one of our major aerospace customers we have long-term contracts, which again define share and also go beyond the end of the decade and beyond. And also we will be wanting to -- or we always consider duration of where we are. There's only one customer in the aerospace world, which is mainly in the business jet turbine market, where we haven't got a lock down, whether that's due for renewal on 1/1/'27, so they're already well past date of supply.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#15

Got it.

John Plant

executive
#16

So what I've been trying to do is to give you a picture of also sustained business, both technologically and by way of contract or more importantly, the way we protect information as well to try to keep stuff inside Howmet knowledge. And we also choose in most areas, not pattern things. So you're not even aware of what we're doing because if we patent it, then you become aware of what we're trying to protect.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#17

That makes sense. Maybe the third element could be perhaps CapEx and the ability to build out greenfield facilities, which you are no stranger to, I guess, is it feasible that in a few years, we wake up and there's a fifth supplier of blades and veins out there, whether whatever spectrum that has?

John Plant

executive
#18

Because in this slice, you never say never because that's for a future event that we know nothing about I see, it's probably very unlikely. But I'm not going to say never. Somebody with unlimited funds and maybe unlimited time. We could, but highly unlikely and it would not be an economic decision.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#19

On that front, if we could talk about the industrial gas market, it's moved at roughly a high single-digit growth rate, and you're clearly seeing the business double now to $2 billion in annual sales. How do you -- you've talked about the business doubling? How do you think about the time line for that and just milestones in achieving that along the way?

John Plant

executive
#20

Well, I think I said earlier, I'd probably be updating everybody...

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#21

I'm trying to get a little bit of a glimpse into...

John Plant

executive
#22

I know and I recognize that. But I'm going to stay strong. and not -- is enticing and as nice as you are, I'm not going to weaken...

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#23

And a little bit of crazy based on... .

John Plant

executive
#24

And with Sheila you always get a bit of crazy I think you all know that as well. But if I say to you, when I update the market, assuming I come through what I just said, I'm probably not thinking I'm going to take it down. How is that I mean is that a lot for you, isn't that a lot just for you?

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#25

That's quite unhelpful actually. When you think about the IGT market, you started off the discussion with the evolution of how data and additional data centers have evolved and that puts more pressure on blades. You've also talked about scaling your single crystal into IGT over the medium term. How do you think about the technology moving within IGT blade specifically?

John Plant

executive
#26

This is clearly this move that's been going on as the aerospace market has done over the last 50 years, going from the Equiax type of blade construction to directionally solidified towards single crystal. It may surprise you to -- the single crystal aspect of the market is actually quite small today. And it's certainly in the most exacting environments where you have that. And it also can depend upon what position in the turbine you are with more likely that it will be towards the front end of the turbine and the gas path. And yet at the most extreme, the most -- particularly in the midsized turbine, the most extreme, the month modern blade is now every bit as sophisticated, if not even more so than the latest aero engine blade. I'm not talking about -- I'm talking about it compared to the commercial arena. I'm not talking about into the military arena. But what we've developed for 1 customer. And now it's not just the first blade, but also we're talking about call very microns of control in multiple parts of that blade on the inside across at least the first stage of 2 or so, again, I want to be careful. I don't want to give too much information for -- on behalf of our customers, but they are truly at the most, I would say, sophisticated level. And so -- and we're doing that not only in those midsized turbines, but we're also provisioning and also now supplying at both a direction solidified and single crystal level in the very large turbine blades and now you're talking things which are 3 feet plus long and getting bigger. And so here the 2, we had the singular biggest casting furnace in the world, and we're just building actually [indiscernible] of several more and we're almost turning that into our industry at the moment. But going to be again at the forefront of that and building the next biggest 1 in the world that, again, can take the scale and size of these bleeds to another level, anticipating there, I'll say, further requirements coming towards us.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#27

I don't blame you for not wanting to give out into every [indiscernible] tweet about a blade and a vein has a quote from you as a factual comment. The follow-up...

John Plant

executive
#28

Shoot.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#29

I don't blame you do not focus on the -- not provide as much technology color. You're in the middle of a significant CapEx cycle and maybe most people don't realize your CapEx has actually doubled since '23 to support the revenue base that's set to exceed $10 billion in '26. As you look to major expansion plans you have in Japan, Europe and the U.S., how do you think about how you balance that with the OEM discussions you're also having through the 2030s and what conversations look like to actually deliver on that demand.

John Plant

executive
#30

I can tell you the sheer scale of the capitalization is certainly testing us. So -- and you actually do interesting and reach physical limits on certain things. So when -- for example, when we are building a new casting furnace what you see above the ground is only half of the machine. The rest of it is sitting at an equivalent level below ground, things that you've never seen because as you visited us, you obviously didn't go below into the tunnels underneath. And why should you, especially if you got heels on. But we wouldn't have shown you anyway. But it's interesting when you actually manufacture these things, you actually have to have plant with big open holes in the floor, so you can build these things. And we've already -- we've just actually -- could you believe it built another 1 just so we can have lots of holes in the floor, so we can build additional machinery to capacitize the future. So it is testing us in many ways because we hadn't thought we were going to be there building this amount of equipment. And so far, we're on track, and we know that our customers want it. In fact, as recently as this weekend, an e-mail because we just completed something with 1 of the large IT customers and saying, thank you very much, and please understand that we would like you to produce even more in '27 and '28. And it is almost like it doesn't really matter why I just produce something just because the demand requirement is so great. And just now the [indiscernible] build -- it's just build. And so that's -- it's quite exciting. We just up against capacity limits. And that's why I've been emphasizing in the last couple of earnings calls, what we've been able to try to achieve on yield because while the capacity is beginning to come in, it's all what we've done so far this year in getting out this additional asset 30% plus has been a function of yield and also moving to more repeatable production using [indiscernible] because we are now having in certain areas of provision being able to go to serial production rather than batch production. And that matters to us.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#31

And to think all these investors thought last week share price performance was the only thing testing you. It happened to be just physical capacity and being able to delivering to customers that you were worried about. So...

John Plant

executive
#32

That was interesting because on Friday, it was all about how am I going to build another 2.5 manufacturing plants on top of what we've already talked about. And everybody else is worrying about something else come Monday morning. It's like -- but that's the way it is.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#33

I guess, to quantify that, how do you think about your level of support to the commercial OEMs and IGT OEMs over the next several years as you've built out these facilities and done a ton of hiring.

John Plant

executive
#34

We try to be really good partners with all of our customers. And we try to take the attitude, do what you say you'll do and meet the commitments that we have agreed on. I mean, it isn't to say sometimes that people don't want more because that's also -- but it's more which has come from for themselves getting surprised by us to see scale. And 3 years ago, I don't think any of us were really talking about these levels of demand and build either in the aerospace market or in the, I would say, the gas turbine market, it was not something in aerospace, it was -- we know we're going to build more aircraft, but nobody had any concept, just see amount of spares that are going to be required. And in the gas turbine market, nobody anticipated, I don't think what was going to be required. And I mean none of us thought we're going to have chips built by NVIDIA at this level? Or is it Cerebras or any of the other custom silicon manufacturers and therefore, turbine manufacturers as well. .

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#35

So on that point, I think spares is 22% of sales doubling from 2019 levels. How do we think about how much higher aerospace IGT and defense spares could go from here?

John Plant

executive
#36

It's difficult to know who's going to win the race on volume increase, given that I think we all are expecting additional aircraft build over the next few years. We're also expecting because we've been provisioning and that's what the capacity is all about producing more obviously. Let's say Mitsubishi is going to build a lot more turbines or is it an over and therefore, we're going to build a lot more OE blade as well. But every one of these things is also producing its own revenue stream for the future by way of additional spares requirements. And the fleet is working harder, I try to describe to you the -- it's not just the volume effect on the fleet, which is the variability of the power demand, which is also driving some of the spares requirements. And any it's difficult to handicap it exactly right now. I mean if you look at the -- I mean, if you say 2027, I mean I'm clear that we're going to be in during the changeover that's going on more likely not the [ LEAP ] 1B. And then I'm thinking about the [ GFA ] and therefore, there's going to be some aspect, which is going to be retrofits of the fleet in some of those things as well. And the gas turbine fleet is working hard. The pipelines are working harder the liquification of natural gas for shipping give more energy provision to Europe is providing demand. So everything is working harder. And then everything that we're going to build or have built from '25 through 2030, that's going to produce a level of aftermarket demand in the 2030s. So should the OE demand stop going up, which I don't think it happens. I mean, at the moment, it seems like build rates are going to increase into the 2030s, and the question is how far into what to -- crystal ball is that the spares demand is also going to increase by a significant factor for us as well. So handicapping like which one is going to have the highest percentage growth I don't think because I'm too worried about it because 1 aspect, we think does it really matter because if they both go up, life is going to be good.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#37

Sounds good. Defense portfolio has been growing double digits, 11% in Q2. It's anchored by the F-35. And I got to think all the usage in the Middle East is going to help some of the blade work. How do you think about your defense portfolio shorter term and also longer term as we think about missiles and drones.

John Plant

executive
#38

It seems like things are changing there as well. I mean, you have the base level of demand for F-35. I think that just continues given both the buildup for the U.S. and Air Force and Marine and Navy, but also for the export orders. Clearly, some of the legacy fighters are seeing some renewed interest that you have now significant increases expected for the F-15 and the F-15 Super Eagle and the basically these weapons carrying load that it can provide. And then the thing which everyone obviously is grappling with at the moment is missile demand. And what's being asked there. And that's the existing designs for missiles. I'm not just talking any classified program. But then there's also what is the method delivery missiles in the future for the larger cruise missiles, et cetera? Is it going to be bigger solid rocket motor or is it going to be smaller turbines. And I think the bet is on some of the smaller turbines and then the whole aspect of these collaborative combat aircraft. And I mean there's things we just don't know except that there's going to be these unmanned aircraft flying alongside manned fighters or manned bombers. And we provide into that part of the defense network as well into the strategic bomber area. But is it going to be 2 collaborative combat aircraft per man? Or is it going to be 22? Or is it more -- what's a swarm? I don't know how big a swarm is. And so these things are just unknown. And anything we know is we want to be engaged and participative with them and do it as an active pace that directionally, it's going to turn out to be good.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#39

Two more questions before I let you off the hook. Your balance sheet sits at 1.2x leverage post CAM. I guess, how do you feel about M&A from here? Do you have a bigger appetite from M&A, just given the 2 recent deals you've done? And the casting [indiscernible] in the market. I'm going to try you 1 more time.

John Plant

executive
#40

Yes. I think that M&A should be part of what we think about by way of capital deployment. Clearly, we still want to have investment in our own capacity for organic growth as the favorite I'll say, return that we get on that. We've been buying back shares. We've been increasing the dividend, and you've seen us do a couple of M&A moves. And -- and I think that roughly speaking, at the end of the year, then we're going to be in a position where our leverage ratio is the same as we exited 2025 having bought back a very significant amount of stock having done, let's say, almost a couple of billion dollars of acquisitions and increase it. So we are generating cash to do all of these things. And so I think that we'll continue to examine is there anything else that is appropriate we could bolt on to the company. I'm still thinking in that vein. I'm not anticipating any very significant deals no matter what you write in your reports. So I just want to get that 1 in -- just in case but I could have a rush of blood to the head but most unlikely. So I don't find it enticing to do things which take us out of our lane -- and I don't think I'm going to answer the second part of your question.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#41

Okay. Last one. I think the Howmet story, and as I look at my note, there's 60% upside to my price target. So Howmet's story is about technology differentiation process and more. What part of the Howmet story excites you most from here? And what do you think investors are underappreciating?

John Plant

executive
#42

I think that there's so much of what we do, which is not necessarily visible. You see the outcomes, but you don't see what goes into it. And so I think I see that and I mean not surprisingly. And so I think the outcomes really will continue to be good and healthy -- and we've taken ourselves a long way. We've established, I think, a technological leadership position, a supply leadership position and just want to keep being [indiscernible] about trying to be the best of what we do.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

analyst
#43

Great. Well, thank you so much, John, for joining me.

John Plant

executive
#44

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Howmet Aerospace Inc. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Howmet Aerospace Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.