Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 15, 2024

NASDAQ US Industrials Air Freight and Logistics conference_presentation 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#1

Good break, but we're going to continue on with next up on our day 2 of our 31st Annual BofA Transportation, Airlines and Industrial Conference. For those new to the room, I'm Ken Hoexter, BofA's Airfreight & Surface Transportation & Marine Shipping analyst. Next up, we welcome Intermodal brokers and logistics carrier, Hub Group with Phil Yeager, President, CEO and Vice Chairman; Kevin Beth, EVP and Chief Financial Officer, joining us here on the stage. Also in the audience from Hub Group is Lorna Williams, hidden over on the left side there, who joined as IR this year. So we welcome all 3 for their first time here at the BofA Transport Conference Hub Group for the second time. So very much looking forward for me to this discussion. With that, Phil, and Kevin, let me turn it over to you for thoughts on the state of the market. I know you have a few slides to kick us off with. And then also as part of your intro, if you can throw in what 3 key takeaways we should leave here with today.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#2

Yes, sure. No, thank you very much for having us. We're excited to be here and really looking forward to the discussion as well. If I think about 3 takeaways everybody has is one, Hub Group has really transformed over the last several years, and that's been leading to some much stronger trough-to-trough financial performance and better returns within the business as well. Second, I would say we also continue to have a rock-solid balance sheet, very strong free cash flow. And third, that's driving our continued investment strategy, which is really focused on organic growth, acquisition-driven growth and now, which is a little bit newer and more consistent return of capital to shareholders. And so we're really excited about how we're positioning the company for the long term and the aligned strategy that we have. And with that, I'll probably just jot in just a quick safe harbor, I hope, I don't know, whatever.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#3

We all read that.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#4

Yes, it was really fast. So we are a supply chain solutions provider this past year 2023, $4.2 billion in revenue, a little bit around a 5% operating margin. It is the second best financial performance that we've had as an organization. 2022 was the next best year. We break ourselves down into 2 key segments: first, being ITS, which you should think of as more of our asset-based solutions. Intermodal is our largest service offering, really what we're known for in the marketplace. We're the second largest provider in the space. We have 50,000 containers, 2,300 drivers. Work with the UP and NS on an exclusive basis and really see some nice opportunities for growth there. We also have a dedicated trucking operation, which is within ITS, high service, long-term contracts, mostly distribution center to store sort of deliveries, about 1,000 drivers, 5,000 pieces of trailing equipment. The other segment, which has been the faster growing and probably more stable portion of our business, is our logistics segment. Recently, we acquired the Final Mile business of Forward Air. That moved us into the top 5 in the big and bulky home delivery business, added a nice appliance capability as well. We have a large truck brokerage operation, which has refrigerated and LTL capabilities that is helping us be more resilient at this point in time, have a great managed transportation business, where we manage over $1 billion of LTL for our customers. And then a great warehousing business as well that we've grown to 11 million square feet across the U.S., mostly LTL consolidation going to inbound into retail. But it's been a great path for us, and we're excited about the future. So where are we going? We set some targets back in 2020 to get to $5.5 billion to $6.5 billion of revenue by 2025 as well as a 4% to 5.5% operating margin. We've been operating well within the operating margin target, obviously, as I referenced on the prior slide, probably have some work to do to get to the revenue targets. But I think as the cycle continues to improve and we continue to execute on our acquisition strategy, we'll be in great shape. I really have 3 core focus areas in our capital. First, investing in the core business, continuing to drive growth in intermodal as well as improving our technology. We're looking at continuing to grow our non-asset logistics businesses, which helps continue to drive strong free cash flow generation, but also help us deepen our value to our customers. Decommoditize our more transactional services like brokerage and intermodal. And then lastly, return capital to shareholders. We have a new leverage target that we've set that we're operating under today. We did a stock split at the beginning of the year, and we're doing now a cash dividend and more consistent share repurchases. So as we think about Hub and why we think we're a good investment, one, we are a leader in the space. We're recognized by our customers, by the industry for our leadership. We have a great management team. We have a very strong strategic plan and focus and continue to generate just significant free cash flow, which positions us for continued investment and success for the long term. So really excited about the opportunities we have and look forward to the discussion.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#5

So let's talk about near-term growth. You talked about growth being down at ITS, down 16% in January, down 6% in February, a little bit worse in March and then a huge upswing of 16% in April. Talk about what you're seeing in the background.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#6

And we referenced this on a prior call that we probably did not move as quickly as we should have on taking price down. I think everybody thought, hopefully, this isn't as long of a cycle and pricing for us is a strong driver of earnings power versus volume. But we were kind of coming over the overhang of that, and that was really what we think will be our last quarter of volume declines. As you referenced, April is going to be up significantly. But I think we also are excited that we've had 4 months in a row now of sequential volume growth. And I think May is trending to be very strong as well. So we're winning a significant amount in bid season. We're well ahead of the targets that we've set by bid. And the interesting thing to me has been the amount of business we're winning in shorter-haul segments like the Local East. That's going to be a big driver of our growth, a lot of conversion from over the road. In my view, one, it's a cost differential, but also the strong service product that we're providing is giving our customers more confidence in converting business from over the road back to intermodal and really utilizing that as a core piece of their supply chain. So we're excited about that.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#7

So let's dig into that on the Intermodal side a bit. So you noted load growth was down 10% overall in the first quarter. Transcon down 6% locally, it's down to local West down 16%. Maybe you want to break that down into what's going on, particularly out West as we now see maybe some of the shift from the East Coast ports, the West Coast ports, we're seeing maybe better volume growth out there. Talk about the potential you see out of that.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#8

Our transcon longer length of haul business has been the most resilient through this down cycle. And so for intermodal, that's really just core lanes for us, and we've done a very nice job in growing that. It's been interesting for me. Typically, when you turn the calendar, we're having to sell actually outbound Southern California capacity and not having to reposition as many containers in. It's been the inverse of that this year. We've been deficit in Southern California all year. So we are getting a benefit from the import demand. I don't think as much because there's a lot more running intact IPI, and that's been a little bit more of a competitive set in those longer lengths of haul. When I think about the short haul, I think there's a good understanding by our customers that the spot market is not going to be at a trough forever that they have gotten a significant benefit out of it. So they're looking for more resilience in their supply chain, more resilience in their capacity. And the fact that we have provided such a great service product in those shorter-haul segments I think, is giving them the confidence to convert that business more permanently. So that's been a really nice indicator of a good driver of our success in bid season, and we think it's going to continue.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#9

So how do you, I guess, compete in that in those West Local East markets, given truck, again, we're talking spot pricing down into the $1.25 range contract rate not quite at that level, but you're more dealing with those customers that would be dealing with contracts. So how do you compete? Where is the gap now or the discount of truck? How wide is that now versus Intermodal? And what would make somebody make that conversion?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#10

I'd say if you look in aggregate, it's probably closer to about 30% would be the contract spread...

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#11

Versus normal?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#12

Versus truck. When you see conversion, it's normally in that high 20s, low 30s. So that's, I think, what we're seeing right now. If you think about shorter haul segments, it's probably in the high teens from a differential perspective. And with the consistent service product, that's been enough to convert business. We've done a lot of really good things, though, as a business to better position from a cost structure perspective as well. So our rail contracts now move both up and down from a cost perspective. We've in-sourced a significant amount of our drayage. We've driven down our third-party drayage costs and put in new chassis programs as well that are helping us reduce costs. The other piece with the additional volume is it creates better velocity for us, creates better balance with our drivers, better balance with our containers. So our empty repositioning costs in the first quarter were down over 20%. Our cost per dry was down 15% in the first quarter. And all of that, I think, was due to -- we saw sequentially improving volumes. And with that trend continuing, it continues to reduce our costs.

Kevin Beth

executive
#13

And I'd just like to add one of the other things we saw was increase of utilization of our containers. So we are up 8% versus fourth quarter utilization. Again, that was one of the goals during the bid season was to make sure that those boxes are moving and turning more often.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#14

So peer competitor, J.B. Hunt noted that they've got 20% excess capacity, presumably stored in yards around the country. How do you think about your excess capacity to store inventory.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#15

We took our stack down about 15% quarter-to-quarter, so Q4 to Q1. So with the sequential volume improvement we needed to unstack, we're trying to get as much as we can out of the existing containers we have out in the fleet right now and trying to avoid unstacking because there is cost related to that. But I think, generally, we're in a similar sort of position where, yes, about 20% is probably the right number. But we are continuing to unstack but once again, trying to get as much utility as we can while keeping service where it needs to be. I think there's a balance you need to want.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#16

Maybe we could step back on Intermodal. Can you set the stage on market size dynamics, both revenue containers in the market?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#17

I mean, obviously, we referenced we're a strong #2 in the market. We're the largest customer, the Union Pacific. We're one of the top 5 customers of the Norfolk Southern and have the second most containers, about 50,000. Some of our competitors are quite larger, about double our size, but we have others that the next closest, the third largest is about half our size. So there are some large gaps between size and we think scale and economics come with that. But I think we've done a lot of really good things recently to position the business. I mentioned on the drayage side, on chassis on our rail contracts. And that's helping us really take on that volume. And I think as we see an inflection in the market will put us in a really good position from a pricing perspective as well.

Kevin Beth

executive
#18

The one other thing, Ken, is that in our acquisitions and our logistics side, that feeds our Intermodal business. And one of the things we really do a nice job is cross-selling. And some of these customers never used intermodal before. And then when we get them in a consolidation program where we get them in a managed trans program, we could teach them and then they are educated on intermodal and the benefits, and then that has been able to also provide more volume for us that way internally.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#19

It's amazing we've been at this for so long, and yet you're still finding customers that have never used or willingness or still so has it because it's so easy to put on a truck and run point-to-point. And no, I hear you on 50,000 containers. If JB has doubled and you've got Schneider, half your size and then even half that size is neigh. And that's the largest guys out there. You talked about maybe we had mispriced and we shifted price. What's going on in the market now in terms of the shift from price to volume focus?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#20

I think what we've seen is we did need to close the gap on rate. We've done that. We're converting business. Some obviously has to be coming from other intermodal providers, but we think mostly over the road, given how short haul a lot of the wins have been. I think we're now seeing stability in the market. So when we moved, it was around these bids last year. So that's where we feel, okay, our renewals aren't going to be down, really, they're going to be relatively flattish. And then we'll continue to see that, hopefully, trend in the right direction that we're at the end of bid season now as we enter bids going into next year, we're hoping we see that positive inflection in pricing. We haven't seen people get crazy or anything. We've seen it everybody say, "Hey, this is where the market is, and we can win business at these rates and generate a return." And for us, we need to continue to control what we can control and drive our costs down. And that's where a lot of that velocity comes in that I mentioned. I mean our repositioning costs continuing to go down, our driver productivity improving. All that helps us continue to compete.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#21

So you don't break out margins by segment? It's just one overall margin versus intermodal logistics and the like.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#22

We do operating income semi.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#23

So you talked about the 4% to 5.5% goal. You've got some that run higher, some run a little bit lower. Is that market driven? Is it more cost? Or is it you've got opportunities on the revenue side?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#24

Well, I think we've done a lot of really good things to improve the aggregate operating margins of the company. Kevin referenced on our last call, our trough-to-trough operating income is double what it was last down cycle. So we've done, I think, a lot of really good things. Part of that is the diversification of our service offerings, getting more value-added services into our portfolio, getting stickier with our customers. A lot of it is also a lot of the things I've referenced that we've done better with intermodal and just taking out costs, managing our headcount very effectively. I think we're doing a lot of those things very well. I think when you start to get into operating margin benchmarking; everybody calculates it a little bit differently. And so what we really try to focus on is our returns. We run a far more, especially in intermodal, far more asset-light model. We don't own chassis. We outsource somewhere between 25% and 30% of our drayage, which is completely non-asset. 30% of our drivers are independent contractors. So you take all that together, if you actually think about the operating margins, the other people also don't include fuel revenue. So I think that inflates operating margins. But all those things taken together, I think we try to focus on, okay, what's the right return for the business. We don't think going out and buying a bunch of chassis is going to be a very good return investment for us. It's a little higher expense, but it's not really going to generate much of a return on capital. So we really try to focus on that. I'd also just say it helps in our free cash flow profile as well. If you think about why we generate so much more free cash flow, it's a lot of that CapEx is much more limited.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#25

So Kevin, given that diversity, you were talking about truck brokerage, Final Mile, consolidation, fulfillment managed trans. How do you think about where to focus the incremental dollars?

Kevin Beth

executive
#26

So when we look at our capital, we're always going to look internally first. Are there more equipment that we could be purchasing to make sure that we're positioned to growth that now includes warehouse equipment as well as we've expanded that business? But after that, we're certainly continuing to look at tuck-in acquisitions, mostly on that light asset and that logistics. We like to look for scale. We like to look for other services that we don't have an expertise in. And we think we found that. We always look for cultural fits. We feel that those are best. They slide in really easy. We like those opportunities as I mention cross-selling earlier. And that is something that we feel we can get our services to different customer bases. We're really able to expand and also expanding our current customers into other specialties. So yes, we're continuously looking for M&A. And then after that, of course, is shareholder returns. We made some changes this year with the stock splits and the dividends. And so over $33 million returned to the shareholders in this past quarter between the dividends and the share buyback. So that's sort of our approach. And then the one thing I didn't mention is technology. Our technology is a purpose and it's trying to make not only ourselves more efficient, but bring better service to our customers.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#27

Phil, I want to revisit something you talked about on price. How do we understand your use of price to win volumes versus the market? So obviously, we hear a lot about pricing competition, but you threw in there it's also still rational. Everybody has settled in a bit. How do we outsiders take an understanding of what's going on in the market.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#28

Well, I think what you saw and I think this is a good example of ITS margins actually improving sequentially, right? And to us, that's a really important indicator of what we're trying to do. We're trying to reduce costs and compete more effectively, maintain our margins where they are, make sure we're being diligent on headcount, setting up better contractual frameworks around chassis and rail, in-sourcing more drayage where it makes the most sense, reducing third-party drayage costs. All those things that are helping us compete with over the road. So while maybe it looks like price is down, we're trying to keep margins in a very kind of neutral to up sort of rationale. I think the other piece is as we add that volume in, it further reduces costs through that velocity. We think about it as a margin per load day model. And everything we're trying to win, we take every bid, we overlay it with our network. So what might look like an irrational price to somebody else to me makes perfect sense because I'm filling in an empty repositioning lane or I'm going to help get my driver loaded back those sorts of things that actually help us reduce costs, better serve our customers, improve the existing margins on our business.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#29

So it's about network balance rather than kind of headlines. Pricing, you noted 40% of your annual bid activity was done in the first quarter. Well, I guess that's typical March to May bid season in terms of the trucking market. But given record low truck pricing, how does it look so far? Did expect weak pricing in the first half maybe flattish in the second half? Maybe give a little insight into how that plays out given the bid season.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#30

That's been generally in line with what we've been seeing, and I think we have outperformed. We have by bid a tracker and goal for every single bid we participate in, how much growth we're trying to get, what lanes we want and we have been tracking that pretty diligently, and we're ahead of where we thought we would be at this point in time, which is a great indication of our performance. We're through the vast majority of bids now. We have a few big ones that are left and continue to see similar dynamics to what we experienced earlier. So at least at this point, we're still feeling confident that we're going to outperform our expectations but need to continue to execute here through this 35% that's remaining.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#31

Let's talk about rail relationships. You've got this long-term relationship with UNP. #1 customer, as you mentioned, also Norfolk will talk about in a minute. But UP has been going through an overhaul with new CEO, Jim Vena, dramatically improving service. What has that done for both the Western and the transcon business and your relationship with UP?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#32

We do have a rock solid relationship, and I've really enjoyed working with Jim. And he has done everything that they've said they were going to do, whether it's service and safety and productivity, I think they're doing all those things. And our customers are responding very favorably to it. We do work very closely with them. And I think the service levels are -- I think what our customers hone in on is when there are disruptions, how fast are you getting back to normal? And so if you think about those winter storms that impacted us at the start of the year, we snapped back to service in about a week. That would take us a few years ago, 5 weeks and now we were back within a week to regular service, gates were all open, everything was flowing seamlessly. And we try to use those sorts of instances as an indication of the resilience of what we're doing. And so we're very pleased with the service our customers are too, and it's going to, in our view, be the catalyst for growth as we think about Intermodal. What's always been missing is when you see that positive inflection in volume, the rail our partners and us haven't provided a great service product. We've struggled to serve our clients. And I think we're in a position now whereas that up cycle comes, service is going to be maintained, and it leads to share gains over the long term.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#33

So you've been king of the hill there for a while but you were a first mover?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#34

I don’'t know about that.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#35

Relative now you've got, let's call it, little sister little brother kicking around on the network, too, in the same business where you had, I don't know, priority access and on claim unmatched given that you were the first mover there. Has that changed at all in terms of service? Or has it enhanced as they start discovering new lanes given volumes or really no difference.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#36

There hasn't been any different, really. I mean, obviously, we watch it closely, and we did watch it very closely. But I would say competitive dynamics haven't changed. Our service arrangements around priority access have not changed, our most competitive rates have not changed. All those things are maintained. It is building some more density. So there are some opportunities, especially with UPNS with the Norfolk to build some more interline traffic not a ton. But I think as you see volumes start to trend in the right direction, I think there's more opportunities for steel wheel versus rubber. So that's another good opportunity.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#37

Let's jump over to Norfolk. So we talk about UP improving service took a while to get there. We certainly on the rail side have watched that for a long time, and it's great to see Jim executing there. And that struggled, just went through a proxy battle where you could have seen even more, I think, upheaval that seems to be maybe delayed. But now you've got a new COO who seems to be more focused on PSR. Historically, PSR initially has eliminated some unprofitable or many intermodal lanes. What are your initial discussions here as they've changed their plans and talked about the maybe potential disruption to your network?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#38

We wrote a public letter of support for Alan and the Norfolk Southern management team. We feel -- I know the public data might not represent this, but the service levels that we have received from UP and NS has been the best we have ever seen. And that's in my 15 years with the company and since we really started tracking on-time performance levels from our rail partners. So we've been really pleased with the service. The international intermodal lanes, I know they cut some, but we've built a great partnership and feel as though their focus is on growing domestic intermodal, and we're very aligned and executing on that. And you're seeing that show up in our Local East volumes continuing to trend so positively. I think a lot of that is the service product that we're getting there. So no, we're very supportive of the team and excited about what's ahead.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#39

And I'm just going to revisit that. So local East down, the least amount which trends come down and Local West down more, which would have to be from improved rail service. I'm surprised looking at those numbers, just given what we see on where truck rates are and that being the most competitive truck market just given the matrix and short haul. What is driving that?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#40

I think it's service. We've reduced costs, which is allowing us to be even more competitive, convert that business. Once customers see the service that we're able to provide, which is truck competitive and the savings that they're getting, they want to keep it on intermodal. In the past, a few years back, that would not have been the case. It was the complete opposite. We were losing business over the road every week. And some people are even paying more money just to move it over the road because our service was not where it needed to be. So yes, we've, I think, really turned the corner there and have a lot of momentum. You'll see Local East for us probably be the strongest growth area for the full year. It's revenue per load wise, not a great mix indicator, but from a margin percentage and from the ability for us to utilize our capacity and get that utility really moving and velocity in the network. It's a really good thing.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#41

So let's talk about the rail cost because you talked about rail costs going up or going down. And right now, you said they could come down on a year-over-year basis. If volumes are coming up, maybe help me flesh that out if loads are if you're talking per load basis and how that's shifting?

Kevin Beth

executive
#42

We're talking per low basis. And as each quarter now, the rail contracts are resetting and this is not something that we've historically seen in my 20 years, first '18. It was just a question of how much they were going up and not if. So that's really been helping us be more cost competitive when we're pricing our business. And one thing to reiterate, though, rail cost of our total cost of intermodal move is about 50%. So while that is the biggest driver is not the only driver. And that's why some of our other programs of our drayage cost and in-sourcing that and keeping those tractors and truck drivers utilized as well as our chassis agreement is helping us keep those costs under control.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#43

On that cost side, you talked about 77% doing your own drayage. You said it's more asset light than peers. What would give me an example? What are peers? How do you comp that versus peers in terms of -- and is that your ideal level kind of balancing out owned and leap in?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#44

I don't exactly know everybody else's percentages. I do know we're the largest purchaser of third-party drayage in the U.S., and we think that's important for us because it gives us market pricing power. So we're able to drive what's the optimal cost structure in a market we could say, "Hey, in Southern California, it makes sense to be 90% of our own drayage. But in Dallas, it makes sense to be 70%, and that can be us toggling between third party, our own assets, independent contractors." So it's a market-by-market sort of analysis. We're never optimal. We're always trying to find, okay, what's the right level to be at. In aggregate, we think through a cycle, it's probably around 80%. I think it's a constantly moving based on what the market is doing based on our need to surge with our customers because I think that's one of the things we pride ourselves on is when our customers are surging because we're such a large buyer of third-party spend, we're able to really meet that demand and surge with them and provide great service through it.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#45

So within this fleet, 50,000 containers, you've got a fleet of 900 refrigerated containers. I think you mentioned that in your intro as well. Thoughts on density within the reefers and how that differentiates you versus peers because on a yield basis, I imagine that's quite the difference.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#46

Oh, yes, it's been great. Yes, longer length of haul typically, a lot of West Coast transcon business, and we've really built a nice dense network within that, though, and really reduce the empty repositioning. I think when we bought Choptank, which is a large refrigerated broker that really helped us diversify our brokerage; we doubled down on our investment in the refrigerated containers. We had about 400 at the time, up to 900, and that sales force has been selling that product really successfully. It is a higher yield, obviously, higher CapEx, but a business we really like, a really good value add when service is really strong, it helps as well because we're beating or around OTR transits because you're running on z trains. So it's been a great add to our fleet, great capability. We plan to continue to invest in it as the market dictates. We don't have any of those stacked right now. They're all out running. So we'll likely continue to grow that fleet over time.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#47

So Kevin, you target CapEx, $45 million, $65 million for the year. Maybe break that down, tech, tractor fleet.

Kevin Beth

executive
#48

So tech we've run $15 million to $20 million a year. Again, all our tech is really with the purpose. We're not necessarily splashy and don't have a lot of press releases about our tech, but we think we can put it up against the rest of the market. Then it's replacement tractors is the other big one. We like to keep our tractor life under 3 years for the safety and the maintenance benefits that you get to that with the newer fleet. And then as we've been expanding the warehousing, we've been investing in our warehouses, whether it's stacking, moving equipment within the warehouse and some robotics even within our warehouses that we've been investing.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#49

So let's talk about Forward Air Final Mile services. You recently bought that adds about almost 300 million revs, doubles your Final Mile business gets you, I guess, maybe $470 million now. We see J.B. Hunt up at $950, RXO at about $1 billion. So you're like you said top 4, 5 players now in terms of Final Mile. What was the focus on doing that?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#50

I think, one, it was very opportunistic. I think I have been in conversations with Forward Air for several years about purchasing the business, mainly because when we bought NonstopDelivery in 2020, it was a great addition to our business. But what we lacked was an appliance capability. And for a lot of our customers, that's one, it's the largest piece of the big and bulky Final Mile space. But two, it's the most service-sensitive and really gets you access at Chief Supply Chain Officer sort of levels. And if you're doing a great job, you're going to continue to grow, and there's a lot more pricing kind of opportunities associated with that as well. Forward Air Final Mile, just a great reputation within the marketplace. And we felt as though being able to move quickly, but due to our balance sheet, being opportunistic when that came around. I think it was a great add. We're well ahead of our forecast on cross-selling in particular. But also the cost synergy side, where we're taking a lot of the Forward Air Final Mile facilities and consolidating existing freight into that to build more density, run more on our own power versus with third parties, and that's been very beneficial to us as well. So it's been a great acquisition, great cultural fit. And we're really excited about it.

Kevin Beth

executive
#51

I would say that the management team really has slid in well. In fact, it was really the first one that we actually allowed that management team to start managing our existing business right from the get-go. And it's been a great fit as Phil said. And they were really excited to come over and see the investment that we are making in them.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#52

So you talked about acquisitions. You've been acquisitive lately. I've got a mini list, you mentioned Choptank but CaseStack, NSD, TAGG Logistics, and I'd go back so many different ones in terms of drayage that you bought over the years. What's your focus? And how do you think about returns or focus of the business leaving just what was intermodal in terms of adding first rage than trucking and then you've added on now Final Mile. How do you think about what end markets you want to hit as...

Phillip Yeager

executive
#53

I think going back as far as you did, certainly, Intermodal has always been our core and the company was started on that. And I think the drayage acquisitions that we did going back many years has allowed us to quickly pop up the different terminals and expand our scale. And since then, we've been diversifying. And again, we went to our customers years back and asked them what other transportation services do you guys like to see that we can help provide the service that you know us for today. And as we've been doing that, that has brought us to the warehouse and the consolidation that, helps our retail customers. On the refrigerated side, that there was brokerage opportunities. I don't even know that a Home Depot moved stuff in refrigerated brokerage, but they do. So we've been able to add additional services and that helps our cross-sell. And the asset-light ones just really feed that cash flow, and that allows us to go out and buy even more. So we're going to continue with that strategy. It's really worked for us. And that logistics business is the operating income to is that steadier. It doesn't have the ups and downs of a cyclical market. So we think that that's a good base that will allow us to continue the profitability going forward.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#54

There's a great rundown for me as well. But I guess if I think about kind of just summing up a little bit and I want you to add on whatever I leave out. But you mentioned Hub's transformed in the last few years, better trough to trough in terms of how you've positioned the company, strong balance sheet, organic growth in terms of your core focus revenue target, the multiyear target you said might be tougher to get to that $5.5 billion, $6.5 billion given the backdrop of the market, but 4% to 5.5% margins, you're basically there and can continue to focus on the cost side as you've run through a couple of times. You've got about 20% of the fleet stacked, but your focus now is on increasing utilization. It's more costly to take them out. So keep focusing on increasing asset utilization of the fleet. Anything else you'd want to add?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#55

No, I think you nailed it. I think we're doing the right things to position the company for the long term, and we're really excited about the opportunities we have had.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#56

And near term, not really fearful of economy deteriorating. I talked with our consumer team and they seem -- there's a little bit more concern about the consumer lately. Are you seeing any of that? Or is it okay? Is it just stable?

Phillip Yeager

executive
#57

I think with where inventories have come down to, we're not as concerned short term. Certainly, if we want the consumer to remain robust and resilient. But I think everybody is in this spot now where they think inventories are in the right position, but they might also need to move very quickly if the consumer actually stays. So I think people are betting that the consumer is weak. If that's not the case, we see a large snapback in some shipping patterns, which could be great.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#58

It's wonderful.

Phillip Yeager

executive
#59

Ken, thank you very much. Appreciate it.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#60

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Hub Group, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Hub Group, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.