IMAX Corporation (IMAX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 12, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to IMAX Corporation's call regarding its intent to acquire full ownership of its IMAX China subsidiary. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's call is being recorded. I'd now like to hand the conference over to Ms. Jennifer Horsley, Head of Investor Relations. You may now begin.
Jennifer Horsley
executiveGood evening, and thank you for joining us to discuss today's announcement that IMAX Corporation intends to acquire full ownership of IMAX China. On the call today to review the transaction are Rich Gelfond, Chief Executive Officer; and Natasha Fernandes, our Chief Financial Officer. Rob Lister, Chief Legal Officer, is also joining us today. Today's conference call is being webcast in its entirety on our website with a replay available shortly after the call. In addition, a press release on the transaction as well as an investor presentation have been posted on the IMAX Investor Relations page on our site. I would like to remind you of the following information regarding forward-looking statements. Today's call as well as the accompanying materials may include statements that are forward-looking and that pertain to benefit to the acquisition, future results or outcomes. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to not occur or occurrences to differ. Please refer to our SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors that could affect our future results and outcomes. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. During today's call, references may be made to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Discussion of management's use of these measures and the definition of these measures as well as a reconciliation to non-GAAP financial measures are contained in this afternoon's investor presentation, which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at imax.com. With that, let me now turn the call over to Mr. Richard Gelfond. Rich?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveThanks, Jennifer, and thanks, everyone, for joining us. We're excited to announce our intent to acquire full ownership of IMAX China. The proposed transaction is for approximately HKD 10 per share in cash or a total of USD 124 million. We believe we are acquiring it at an attractive multiple. The offer represents an approximately 49% premium to the 30-day trading average closing price of IMAX China. IMAX's global growth strategy is predicated on being nimble, true and opportunistic from region to region, market to market. It's a strategy that has carried us to nearly 90 countries and territories helped us build one of the most widely recognized entertainment brands worldwide and established IMAX as a critical piece of the future of movies. The proposed transaction is a clear reflection of that strategy, and we believe is positive for both IMAX Corporation and IMAX China shareholders. We believe this rewards IMAX China's shareholders by offering them a premium to today's market prices and immediate value on their investment. For IMAX Corporation, this transaction is expected to provide immediate financial and operational benefits. First, from the financial perspective, we expect this acquisition will be accretive immediately following completion based on IMAX Corporation's and IMAX China's financials. If you look at the first quarter of 2023 results by way of example, and adjust them to add back the IMAX China minority interest, then IMAX Corp. Q1 adjusted EBITDA would have been $5 million higher or 18% higher. And Q1 net income would have been $2.7 million higher, which equates to earnings per share of $0.05 or 109% higher. In fact, it's much more accretive than if we had bought in IMAX Corp. stock under our share repurchase plan. And this is before realizing approximately $2 million of annual public company cost savings as well as potential tax efficiencies resulting from the China go-private transaction. It would also allow us greater flexibility in the usage of IMAX China's cash, which was approximately $78 million at the end of Q1. Second, strategically, this unifies IMAX Corporation at IMAX China and would allow us to be faster and more flexible and bringing promising new growth initiatives, particularly our streaming and in-home entertainment technologies for the China market. Third, from an operating and structural perspective, this would streamline our corporate organization, reducing costs and potentially driving greater efficiency across our business. It would also streamline our financial reporting. We already consolidate IMAX China revenues, and now we will be able to consolidate the full EBITDA and profit of our highest profit region. Furthermore, it takes out the illiquid to IMAX China shares, which we hope will reduce the complexity for public markets when valuing the entire IMAX enterprise. We remain as optimistic as ever about IMAX, its business, and its future growth potential in China. IMAX is a valuable, widely recognized premium brand in China. The first quarter was our highest grossing Q1 ever in China, thanks to our highest grossing Chinese New Year ever, thanks to our highest grossing local language release ever, and resulting in our highest grossing quarter ever for local language films. Through our diversified programming strategy, we are the only global entertainment platform in China that could take advantage of Hollywood blockbusters like Mission Impossible and local blockbusters like Lost in the Stars. Hollywood films are securing release states in China with increasing consistency. According to Maoyan, 26 U.S. films have been approved for release in China year-to-date versus 25 for the entirety of 2022. We consistently deliver double-digit opening weekend box office market share on Hollywood releases, even though we're on 1% of screen penetration in China. We are working more closely with China filmmakers and studios than ever. We've launched some of our most exciting brand extensions into streaming, mobile and other platforms to date in China. And we believe this transaction will further strengthen the financial and operational foundation of our business and help foster a new era of growth for IMAX in this vital market. With that, I'd be happy to take your questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Eric Handler of ROTH MKM.
Eric Handler
analystRich, so back when IMAX China went public, I think 2015 or so, one of the reasons that you talked about going public was it looked good politically and has served the purpose in China to have that. Here we are 8 years later, I'm curious, as you buy this in, does it make a difference at all politically? How is your standing with the government?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveSo the IMAX China IPO was done at a time of our rapid expansion in China to unlock the value to shareholders of the much higher growth rate in that region, but we're much more established now. We raised the cash in the IPO, and we invested it and took out a private equity holder. By the end of 2015, when we did that, we had only 290 locations in China. We now have close to 800. We'll continue to run our business in China, just how we've been doing. We have over 100 employees in China, and that won't change. Local leadership remains the same. Strong relationships with government entities and exhibitors, deep connections with local filmmakers. Brand awareness study in 2019 by Maoyan showed an 85% awareness for IMAX. Our market share in China in Q1 was up 4% to 4.6% on 1% of the screens. The short answer is, we're comfortable that we become very established during that point in time. As a matter of fact, as you know, well, Eric, local language is a very important part of the box office and our relationship with stars, with directors, with studios is very different than it was at that time. So we're very comfortable that this won't really affect our fundamental position or our relationships.
Eric Handler
analystGreat. And then just as a follow-up. You mentioned in your prepared remarks about having some opportunities that you previously weren't capitalizing on specifically streaming and in-home. I think this is somewhat new in terms of what you're mentioning here. Is that something you can elaborate on at this point?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveYes. I would just say, Eric, if you look at some of our initiatives on the corporate side, like SSIMWAVE, since they're non-businesses, of which IMAX-China bought into, we couldn't otherwise launch those opportunities in China, unless IMAX China decided to buy in and there was a separate strategy, which is time-consuming and complicated. So as a result of this potential transaction, we'll be able to roll out our initiatives a lot more seamlessly in China than we can today.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Michael Hickey of The Benchmark Company.
Michael Hickey
analystHey, Rich, I hope you can hear me. Lines are little shaky here. Hope you guys are good. Congrats on this deal. Very exciting. I'm not sure if Natasha is on the call here or not. But if so, she may want to chime in. Just curious, I appreciate the $5 million add back in the first quarter. If you look sort of pre-pandemic, it look like for the year of '19, the add-back would be about $22 million in EBITDA. And obviously, that's off a whole box office and I think pretty good network growth, which is adding some EBITDA to the total. So I guess how do we think about in a normal China market, 1Q was great, 2Q not quite as great, but obviously, we're hopeful for the year. But in the full box office are close to it and with some network growth, Rich and Natasha, what's the add back on EBITDA? And then, Rich, just to that question, I know you said you're going to keep the employment, the same 100 employees. Daniel, obviously, looks like a superstar CEO. So it's great to hear that. But I imagine that there would be some efficiencies from the team given that they're not running a public company, and I'm guessing that some of the [ intent to ] streamline and guessing some of the operational elements would be streamlined given that they're not a public company. So I was just curious on the math there as much as you can help us.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveYes. So in my remarks, I mentioned that we expected to save approximately $2 million, maybe a little bit more in public company expenses. And obviously, that would entail some of the people who are involved in running it as a public company and some other related costs, like board fees and things like that, issuing reports, conference calls, things like that. So there will be incremental savings that we did not include when we talked about the accretion and how much it will be accretive. Obviously, the more the earnings are in China, the more value we'll get to be accretive. But we're not going to give guidance for the rest of the year or for next year in China. There are a couple of reports out there that you can consult from analysts. But we're very excited about the transaction and its impact on EBITDA and earnings for IMAX.
Michael Hickey
analystYes. Nice to know. We are, too. Just I guess second question, Rich. I remember as well when you did this deal, it was super exciting, and I think it was definitely the right move. Just curious like how this sort of originated the time line, why it makes sense to sort of do it now? Obviously, I don't want you to lay out your whole pitch again. But just sort of curious, maybe anything incremental there. And then just the box in 2Q in China was a little slow. Just curious how you see the remainder of the year in network growth in that region?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveSo China started to rebound from the pandemic in December when the quarantines were lifted and movie theaters were reopened. And in the first quarter, as I said, it was our best first quarter ever. We have not yet reported our second quarter. But things are certainly better than they were during the pandemic, and it's coming back. And I think it would be our hope and expectation that over time it would come back to pre-pandemic levels. And hopefully, over time, even better than that because of our increased focus on local language films. So we're optimistic about the market. In terms of why now and the reasons, the capital markets in China have not really appreciated the IMAX China story. And the sector is down, the volume is very low. We used to have 15 analysts that covered us. We now have 3 analysts that cover us. And I think we just looked at all the factors I discussed in my opening remarks, and we concluded that this was the right time to do it.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Omar Mejias of Wells Fargo.
Omar Mejias Santiago
analystRich, maybe quick questions. How will this change your go-to-market approach in China? Maybe can you talk around some of the near-term opportunities and then more of a long-term approach. Would this have any specific impact in terms of how you go about local language films? I know that's been a very successful strategy for you guys. But any immediate changes to your operational strategy there? That would be helpful.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveI don't think so, Omar, other than the cost savings of being a public company. And I think -- we'll also take a look at our cost structure overall. It also gives us just much more operating flexibility. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, we could do different kinds of tax planning on a global basis, and we think that could be advantageous to the entity overall. And being listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange puts a lot of constraints on your operational flexibility, and we can more align the operations of China to the operations of Corp. So I think over time, other benefits will accrue.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from the line of Eric Wold of B. Riley.
Eric Wold
analystRich, kind of a follow-up on a previous question. I don't think that you've announced any new signings in China so far this year. So how do we think about the ability to harvest the existing backlog in that country? Has the trend and time line on installations out of backlog changed, if at all? How flexible are you seeing that backlog in terms of moving locations around the different cities or [ the media ] they originally planned to boost monetization of the backlog.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveSo IMAX Corp. issued guidance on installations in our first call this year. And nothing has indicated that we should change that guidance at this point. And we had a lot of signings at IMAX this year, which, if anything, have given us more confidence in the range that we've put out before. Some of those signings are in China -- some of those installs, I'm sorry, are in China. And nothing we've seen has changed what that's going to entail this year. It's neither better nor worse than we expected. I answered part of this in an earlier question, Eric. But I think as the year goes on, things will start to go back to pre-pandemic levels, and that includes signings and installs and all of that box office. And I think we're on a decent trajectory. Again, we'll announce our earnings in the -- at the end of July. And then we'll talk about how the second quarter was. But I don't think it will be different under the context of this transaction or how it was before the primary differences will be -- maybe somewhat in the cost structure and somewhat in how accretive it is to IMAX Corp.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of David Karnovsky of JPMorgan.
David Karnovsky
analystRich, just wanted to see if you could discuss with the new structure and the cash freed up, how that might impact any capital allocation decisions. And then in the slides, you mentioned just maybe some efficiencies around the tax side. I wanted to see if you could speak to that.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveNatasha, why don't you answer that?
Natasha Fernandes
executiveDavid, yes, we -- so we're acquiring it for $124 million. We will be using a good portion of revolver and perhaps some cash on hand at that time. And really, when you think about capital allocation, it's a good use of our money. We have choices between our growth CapEx that we talked about on our earnings calls of investing in our JVs and then we do share repurchases. And this is a really good opportunity for us, even more accretive than doing share repurchases at the corp level, as Rich said in his prepared remarks, to be investing in this acquisition to bring back China. The other part to mention and Rich did have it in his prepared remarks as well is, there was $78 million of cash sitting at the IMAX China level. And some of that -- this now gives us an opportunity to unlock the ability to use cash as well at a consolidated level. And so I think from that perspective as well, having that access to cash will help us in the long run.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveThere is also cash leakage because we paid a dividend out of China and obviously close to 30% of that went outside the IMAX [ Corp. paring ]. So after this transaction, we'll have the ability to keep that cash as well.
Operator
operatorQuestion comes from James Goss of Barrington Research.
James Goss
analystIt's me, Jim Goss. In a broader sense, you've been gaining a lot of traction in sort of the rest of the world ambitions, including Japan and India. I assume this does not impact, say, the relative growth ambitions in China relative to those other markets. And also, I was going to ask about the financial structure. I believe you've viewed some variation on the joint revenue sharing model in China. Is that correct? And is that what you plan to pursue in anything future?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveYes. I mean, Jim, it's going to be pretty much business as usual. And yes, we had a variety of transaction types in China: hybrids, joint revenue sharing arrangements, sales. As you know, in recent years, we've -- especially in lower-tier markets try to place more emphasis on the sales model or the hybrid model, and I think we'll continue along those strategic lines. Of course, in the right instances, we'll still do joint revenue sharing. But it's not really changing our overall business strategy other than enabling us to pursue our new business ventures more simply, quickly and efficiently.
James Goss
analystOkay. And in terms of the relative growth profile, no change there either, there's just ownership structure, nothing more.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveYes.
Operator
operatorWe do have a follow-up question from Eric Wold of B. Riley.
Eric Wold
analystQuick follow-up, either Rich or Natasha. Obviously, you mentioned a couple of times that the transaction will improve your ability to use or have access to that $78 million of cash, how the subsidiary at a corporate level. So maybe a little bit more on the process there, kind of the ability to use that cash for things outside of the region. How would that happen tax implications? Maybe give a lower sense of that -- that value kind of after policy [ use duration ]?
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveAs with all of our cash in China, historically, I mean, we can take it out of there and use it for whatever reason we want to when we have 100% ownership. And there are -- there's a little slippage cost in terms of withholding tax, but there's nothing preventing us from doing it. Obviously, we'll want to keep some cash there to run the business. But after the closing, we can do whatever we want with it.
Operator
operatorThank you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference back to Richard Gelfond for closing remarks.
Richard L. Gelfond
executiveOkay. Thank you, operator, and thank you for joining us at this last minute. It was -- the timing is a little complicated because of the time differences in Hong Kong and here and the regulatory scheme, and that's why we had to do it at this later hour. But we're really excited about doing this. I mean as I said in my introductory remarks, from a financial point of view, we think it's very good from an IMAX Corp. point of view. We think it makes sense from an IMAX China point of view. They had a very undervalued, under-followed, under liquidity staff there. So we think it's a good thing for all. We think, strategically, it simplifies things. And as Natasha just said, I think we could do much more efficient tax planning -- so at a lot of levels. And our IMAX China team is excited about this, and they were involved in negotiations, the independent directors and IMAX China looked at it and approved it. So we think it's very much a win-win situation. And over time, on our earnings call, we'll be happy to answer any more of your questions that you have. But we think it's a very good thing for all involved.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete IMAX Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to IMAX Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.