IMAX Corporation (IMAX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 3, 2025

NYSE US Communication Services Entertainment conference_presentation 43 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#1

Welcome to our 32nd Annual Media and Telecom Conference. We're thrilled to start the day with Rich Gelfond, CEO of IMAX, and Rich has a lot to talk about today.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#2

So you've clearly managed your business extremely well and what is only -- can only be described as a very challenging box office environment post pandemic. What impact has your global programming strategy had on your business?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#3

A really significant impact, Jessica. As a matter of fact, if you look at the theatrical industry, in general and particularly North American box office, it's having a very challenging year. For IMAX, this will be a record year. And we've guided to $1.2 billion in box office revenue, and we're tracking very well against that number. As a matter of fact, the only reason I'm going to reveal this is because online at the end of every month, we post our box office, so we're going to post it today. So quarter-to-date, we're at about $270 million, and consensus is $286 million, and we have a month to go. So while others in theatrical have kind of been negative and saying the box office is terrible, not to go too overboard with it, but quarter-to-date, we're up 40% from last year. And the North American exhibitors in North -- with their box office is down14% quarter-to-date. So we're just in a completely different business. And we've been saying that for years. And this is -- last year, I guess, the first year investors really understood that much more, and our stock has been on a tear, and we're close to a 5-year high on a consistent basis. But who cares about that? What I care about is how the business is doing, and it reflects very much reality. So some of the key points, I'm sure we'll get into this, is we've really pivoted where we do not just North American movies, but global content. So 1/3 of our box office year-to-date is foreign language film. We're doing a film now called Demon Slayer, which is a Japanese film, and it has already become the biggest film in Japan in the history of IMAX. I don't remember exactly the number offhand, but we're releasing it in 40 other countries. And this movie will do really high numbers for us. And I bet most people here never even heard of the movie. And I think one of the bigger issues with Hollywood is that they have a mantra, which is streaming, streaming, streaming, and they've been just so focused on streaming. So pre-pandemic Hollywood's market share was 80% of content. Last year it was 60%. So if I were running a company, I think I'd have a lot to answer for losing 40% market share over that period of time, but everybody seems to be doubling down on streaming whereas the only ones I can think of are IMAX and Netflix that have really been looking globally for box office and it's been really...

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#4

I was going to say that you sound like the Netflix of theatrical. So you take a lot of local content and it translates.

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#5

Yes. And it's not just in the country, it plays in. Demon Slayer is a good example because we're showing that in 40 other countries. And then just briefly, we also do alternative content. So in the last week or 2, we've done a dead rerelease of a film, a Dead live concert from Golden Gate Park. We have prints playing right now. Later in the year, we have the Stones. So we all -- we program it like almost like, someone who owned a box would program it. We did League of Legends in China, the final and it's sold out in 160 theaters, pretty quickly. So we have a totally different view. We think -- we know we have a platform and we're in 90 countries, and it's just a different business.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#6

All Right. We will get back to some of those, the comments that you made. But in a world where premium or demand for premium is so great. How do you think about the positioning of IMAX in the overall landscape?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#7

Well, I think your point about premium applies beyond theatrical. So if you look at sporting events, things like F1 or Formula One or you look at concerts, the public post pandemic seems to really be seeking out premium experiences. And we have competitors, their biggest similarity is they have an X in the name that's how they compete with us. But the public really wants premium experiences, and they're willing to pay extra for them. And our market share has gone up consistently. We have a 40% higher market share than we had pre-pandemic. And one of my favorite statistics is in indexing in the United States in our 50-plus year history. Before this year, we had 5 films where we did over 20% of the box office on 1% of the screens. In the last 3 months, we've had 3 films that have done over 20% of the box office on 1% of the screens. And when you look at the demand, because part of your question was how do you sustain that? The ecosystem really gets numbers. So the studio is really leaning in. The directors are certainly leaning in. And what we do is we have a film for IMAX program where we use IMAX Cameras both film and digital to capture images. And for 2026, we already have 11 films committed, which is about the number we had for all of this year and '27, '28, we even have films for '29. So I think it's become like a virtuous cycle where I talked to one director last week who called me up to talk about the next few films he was making. And he said, well, I need dates for '27 and '28. And he said, we got to talk about it now because I'm not going to release the film if it's not released in IMAX.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#8

So on that topic films for IMAX films, I think you've more than doubled the number of titles this year since -- in the past year or almost doubled. Can you talk a little bit about how you're able to drive studios and filmmakers to use the technology in production?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#9

Yes. As a matter of fact, I like to think about how much content we put through the network. And this year, we'll have 130 separate piece of content. So that includes Hollywood films or local language films or alternative, all that. We don't have to push it through this demand. So this anecdote, I was telling you about the filmmaker, I mean, he called me last week on vacation to make sure that he gets these dates. And there are projects out '28, '29, where the filmmakers are driving it and the studios are driving it. And one of our most difficult nuts to crack not surprisingly, historically was the Walt Disney Company because they're so -- their brand is so strong, and they lean into their brand, but they observe that IMAX was doing all this over-indexing. So really, it started on their own they said we want to lean in heavily to the IMAX brand, and they do it really way in advance. So Avatar is the end of this year, we already with them have great brand campaign centered obviously around Jim Cameron in the movie, but IMAX is a really big part of it. So it's much more their ability to read the financial results and then they're coming to us.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#10

Right. So what is the typical difference in how these films perform, the films in IMAX versus call it a regular film like...

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#11

Well, in IMAX, we used to be about 10% of the domestic box office for kind of a blockbuster sort of like a Marvel film or another kind of action film. But this year, we're doing 15% on those kinds of films. So if you're dating a blockbuster film, it kind of sounds hard for me to believe, even though I'm saying it is a lot of the studios plan their release schedule around the availability of IMAX screens. And a lot of behind the scenes trading takes place where a studio is saying, "I'm going to release a film on this date," but we're booked with someone else, and they move the date. There were 2 films dated on the same day, Predator from Disney and Running Man from Paramount this year and that we were going to share screens for both of them, but they worked it out, so they moved the dates. So now we have a full week to play Predator and a full week to play Running Man. So it's kind of ironic because all this is very much in the background, but where we play a strong role in curating how these films fall together, like it's not an accident that a lot of blockbusters aren't dated on the same date because the studios really want an IMAX release.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#12

And do you envision a point in time where most or all of your films across your network are filmed for IMAX?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#13

I don't think so, Jessica. And the reason is we like to do special films. So obviously, coming up in '26, one of the most special is The Odyssey that Chris Nolan is doing. And Chris approached us, I don't know, 1.5 years ago to say, could I have July 17, 2026. And we usually don't make this bigger commitment, but we committed 3 weeks to him to do that. And increasingly, that's very much what happened. So in '26, we're playing the new Star Wars, the Mandalorian film. We locked that down. I don't know, 6 months, 8 months ago. If you think of the real Avatar we locked up a long time ago. So the studios and the filmmakers recognize the incremental box office. And also, this kind of sounds weird, especially at a financial conference because you would think it's all about the money. But for the filmmakers, it's about more than the money, it's about painting on the biggest canvas on the planet, and it's the way they want their movie shown in the way they want to do it. So when they work with us, and they have really good financial results. And we've done tests where you ask how much the audience likes a film after they've seen it in IMAX and you ask how much they like the film seeing in a regular theater. And by the way, it's -- we -- they are separate groups who ask, but that you get a much higher like score. So it actually -- it makes the film better for the audience and going back to one of your earlier points, especially at a time where people are leaning into premium and especially coming off a time when they got a little tired of watching everything on the couch and taking all kinds of breaks and their kids coming in and out, this has become a much more popular way to watch movies and the filmmakers really know that.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#14

So there's a lot going on. We've kind of alluded to streaming or talked about streaming a little bit already. But -- so I'm going back to that. There's just so much going on in theatrical production and distribution even with the streamer. So you have Amazon, MGM with coming releases, Mercy and also Project Hail Mary. Apple released Formula F1. Netflix, K-Pop Demon Hunters went from streaming to theaters. So now with the streamers coming to theaters, could you talk about the implications for this on your business and theatrical overall?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#15

Well, first, at a very high level, what drives IMAX are the slots that we have. So even though I said there's 130 pieces of content, the main blockbuster slots, I don't know, there are 15 of them that drive a lot of the box office during the year. And you have the studios competing for those slots. Well, now you have the streamers competing for those slots. So if there are 5 people competing for these slots, you now have 8 because you have Apple and you have Amazon and you have Netflix. So like in any business, having a stable supply but more demand. I mean that's a really good thing for your business in the most simple terms. And we made a particular push into streamers. A lot of people have treated streaming or theatrical as like a religion. I'll never show something streamed or I'll never take my product and put it in a theater. But we have a much more pragmatic view and I really think we're going to succeed at. It's the new model, it's going to be some kind of hybrid. And we figured out that we want to be part of that hybrid. So a couple of very quick examples. In F1, which was produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and Joe Kosinski directed it, both of whom did Top Gun and they did Top Gun with IMAX, where we're really successful. A year or 2 before they started the movie, they came to see us. And they said, tell us what an IMAX date could be because we haven't succeeded theatrically and we want to lean into theatrical. So we were a part of it. Their distributors were Warner Bros, but they didn't hire their distributor until about 6 months after we reached a deal. So they did an unconventional route. They didn't go through a studio. They want us. And we're close to $100 million in IMAX in F1 and the film has done about $600 million worldwide. So we're about 15% of the global box office. And it's a different movie in IMAX. So I wouldn't say that about every movie, but if you see it is just a completely different movie. And then I don't know. As you know, I could talk about this for a month, but Narnia is coming out the end of '26 and that's a Netflix film. And everybody knows that Netflix has had kind of a bias against theatrical and everybody is fighting with everybody else. So Greta Gerwig is the one who really started it. She felt that she was really making an IMAX movie. And she always wanted to make an IMAX movie and she and we came up with a plan, where we talk to Netflix. And so -- in Thanksgiving of '26, the film is coming out in IMAX a month before it comes out on streaming. And the agreement we made, which -- you understand, we didn't have to do that movie. So we're not like a theatrical North American exhibitor that needs the content we have more demand than we have supply. So we were able to drive a deal that worked for IMAX, which is one where we said. Okay, we'll do it, but we want theatrical marketing. We want Greta to do her interviews, real premiers, you'll see the marketing, which we're already working on, much of which is going to say, see it on IMAX and in Netflix and it's exclusive to the IMAX network. So our roughly 1,800 theaters worldwide. So if you're not in the IMAX business, you're not showing that movie. So I think that's a tremendous opportunity. And we saw this weekend even with the K-Pop movie that Netflix released that despite at a high level, people fighting, the audience is really happy to see the right movie which you could stream in a theatrical way. And it's really worked. And Netflix can see it for themselves, but at Netflix, I think there are a lot of people, including Ted to some extent, that think this is a good experiment and are looking forward to the results of it. And I know it's hard to believe, but we get along really well. We're working together. And I do think the other part of your question had to do a traditional exhibitors. I do think over time, there's going to be a model where theatrical and streaming work together, I think this weekend was just the beginning of it. And I do think not only because of the slots, but because the filmmakers will be significant beneficiaries of that.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#16

No, all things definitely seems to point to theatrical even with Netflix, which is a huge change. But there's also other stuff going on in the industry. It seems like finally, after years and years of expecting this, that media consolidation is just seems inevitable. And we're starting to see the beginning with Paramount and Skydance and this ramp in speculation about legendary and Lionsgate or Lionsgate and somebody, likely sale of Warner Bros, post the split from Warner WBD. Are there any implications of all of this on your business?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#17

Yes. I think they're mostly good ones because I think what you do is you bring more capital to studios or entities that are undercapitalized. So Paramount guidance is a really good example. So David Ellison announced that, I guess, some conference recently, that he's going to do, I think, 20 blockbusters sorts of films rather than Paramount was doing 80 a year just because of the capital constraints that they were operating under. And I don't remember the number, but we've done probably 15 movies or more with Skydance over the years. We have a great relationship with David and with Jeff. And we're already discussing more movies that they could do in IMAX. So that's kind of one example. And then your other part about consolidation, another place I would go is like Amazon MGM. So Amazon was very kind of leaning away from theatrical, and then they bought MGM. And on the list, you mentioned Hail Mary and Mercy and a number of other movies, they're very interested in IMAX release. And then there's the numbers. I mean, despite what some people say, you can't deny the fact that a theatrical release enhances the value of streaming. And in fact, we did a study. I don't talk that much about it because it's not the most scientific thing, but I think directionally is important, where we showed consumers, movie posters and some of them said, see it in IMAX and some didn't. And we said, how likely would you be to want to see this movie in streaming. And again, one reason I want to push it too hard because it was almost too good to be true. But when you put the IMAX name on the poster, so many more people said they want to see the streaming version. I think F1 is going to be a great test right now because Apple really held a fairly long window originally, they made it for streaming. But I think we're going to see great streaming numbers. And I think it's going to work for them. And then I think the exhibitors like we just saw this week and are just going to decide how is it better for me not to play that content? I mean I just think it's like kids in a sandbox. But when people kind of get real about what's best for their business, they're going to converge in a way that's going to be good for everyone.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#18

So maybe moving on to markets outside of the U.S. I mean you generated the majority of your revenue outside of North America. How much more runway is left for growth in these markets where you still seeing somewhat underpenetrated?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#19

So we give out kind of guidance about what the addressable market is. And the last time we did that was 3 years ago, where we're going to have an Investor Day later this year. We're going to give out a new or revised version. But we're about 50% penetrated now of our total addressable market. Even the U.S., which is one of the most penetrated, we made deals with 8 new different chains last year. In Australia, last year, we had 4 screens and the year before, we had 2 by the time Avatar opens this year, I think there'll be 10. So it's the kind of thing. It's a very weird dynamic because people say, well, it works in Malaysia and Korea and Japan, but it's never going to work in Australia. And then surprise, it works in Australia. And then you have the theater chains compete with each other, and that's what's going on now in Australia. So that's why it's grown so rapidly. Another really rapid growth market is Japan, where we've had 11 signings so far this year for new theaters and the most we've ever had, I think, is 12. Western Europe is still very underpenetrated. Obviously, the Middle East is really good growth area for entertainment in general. And for IMAX, the disposable income is high. The IMAX ticket premium, they could afford it. So that's a very good market for us. A little ways probably a little farther back is South America. There are a lot of -- I hate to use the word at a conference like this, but there are a lot of tariffs coming from South America, and it's really hurt our growth in the region because they're so high. And obviously, that world is changing fairly rapidly. So we'll see what happens there. Most of our growth will come outside of North America. And by the way, 2/3 of our revenues are outside North America now. And before anyone asked the question, the economics are virtually the same, anywhere in the world. So it's not like a subsidized thing. And Formula One, I think that 2/3 of its business outside of North America. So I think again, for a relatively small company, were really global, and I think that will really sustain our addressable market over the next number of years.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#20

I don't want to front run your Investor Day, but have you said what your network potential is?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#21

We haven't and we probably will do that at our Investor Day. Other than to say it's about double where it is now, we haven't said that.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#22

So in the first half of this year, your local language box office is already over 50% higher than in '24. How do you view local language content evolving as a percentage of your mix?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#23

So if you go back to a pre-pandemic around in '19. In China, local language did pretty well for us. But that was about it. And I don't remember the number. I think it was probably 10% of our box office local language. In '23 and '24, it was around 20% of our box office. And as I said, this year, we're about 1/3 right now. But earlier in the year, as you know, there was a Chinese film called Ne Zha 2, which did over USD 2 billion, mostly in China, but globally. So we were -- it was 40% of our box office. So now it's settled down to around 33%. But as I said, Demon Slayer is going to be a pretty big movie. I think 40% is a reasonable goal over the next couple of years, but it could be a lot more than that. So a little anecdote that's right up to date is, we had a very good second quarter. We beat on almost every line and our stock went down 15%. And the reason was, everybody said, "Oh, August, it's going to be a terrible month, Fantastic Four is the last of the blockbuster movies coming out of Hollywood. And we tried to say we have Demon Slayer, we have alternative content this that. But investors are very much in this North American mindset. And had they sold off the North American exhibitors that would have been right because as I said, they were down 14%. Well, we're back higher than we were then because we're quarter-to-date, up 40%. And I think that's one of the biggest disconnects as people think of our business like they think about North American exhibitors, but the local language business is huge. And there's been a huge change in the local language business in the last couple of years, which is that we did very well in the country where the film was from. So if we did a Japanese movie, it did very well in Japan or a Chinese movie in China. But they've started to migrate. So a lot of the box office. So I don't want to remember the name of the movie, but Anime is very successful globally. So some of the anime movies we've done give us more box office in China than they give us in Japan. And that's a trend. I definitely see happening. And again, I think eventually, it's an opportunity for Hollywood, but they're still so obsessed with this streaming narrative. And again, nobody asked my opinion so they can run their business the way they want. But I think that's an obvious way to go. And I think you'll see more of that.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#24

Right. How do you think about allocating capital across regions? Do you see opportunity here in the U.S., China? Or is rest of the world more interesting?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#25

Well, we have 2 models for our theaters. One is where we sell our equipment and one is where we do joint ventures and just a high-level version of our model, when you blend it all in addition to upfront payments for our systems, we get around 18% of the box office. So if somebody buys a ticket, we get paid by the studio and we get paid by the exhibitor. We get paid more if it's a joint venture because obviously, we've gotten less money upfront, whereas if that's called a sales-type lease. So we've been a little bit cautious about our capital. So a bad story probably, but one not so bad for us is we had 60 theaters in Russia, which are all closed now, but we didn't joint venture any of them. We sold them. So we got cash upfront. So when that happened, it didn't really have a dramatic effect on us. So Jess, it really depends very much on the territory. So in China, we used to do more joint ventures, but we've cut it back as the global situation has changed a little bit. So I think since we're generating more cash. I think you'll see us allocating more to JVs in the right territories. We did a pretty big deal with AMC this year and a pretty big deal with Regal, where we did a number of theaters in the U.S. and some foreign markets. So we think about it less by region and more by country. And again, Japan is one. We love doing JVs with because their per screen averages are so high. Again, we get a percentage of the box office. So you'd rather do a joint venture in Japan than you would in India because the box office is so much higher. So I think that's maybe a better way to think about capital allocation.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#26

Okay. And then maybe moving on to some of the things on the content. For years, franchises in Superhero films dominated the box office, but more recently, they've had big success at best. And we've seen some of the original IP do really well. How do you view these dynamics?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#27

So I think it's good for IMAX because of Warner's 7 movies in a row that have been #1, every one of them was an IMAX film. So Sinners is a pretty good example. For those of you who haven't seen it, I'm sure you know, it's basically a vampire story about the Jim Crow South. And you wouldn't -- that doesn't scream IMAX to you. But Warner Brothers and we both really leaned into the fact that it was filmed with IMAX film, and it was the first movie after Oppenheimer, which won the Academy Award and did a $1 billion -- close to $1 billion. And Odyssey, which is the next one being filmed with IMAX film cameras. And the narrative was Autumn filmmaker, filmed with IMAX film and Ryan Coogler really leaned into that narrative. So it broke out in the first week and obviously, it was a great movie by a great filmmaker that's not a formula that works. So if it's not a really good filmmaker. But I think it kind of says to the public that this is a special movie. It was shot with IMAX film cameras. And I'm sure most people here heard the anecdote that we and Universal put tickets on sale for Odyssey, a year in advance. And we only put some on for the film ones, and it completely sold out a year in advance. So that's kind of the power of the IMAX brand to have something -- I mean no one had seen a trailer and no one -- Chris Nolan is notoriously secretive about his product, but it's sold out. And like in New York, I think it's sold out in 1 minute. So I think for original IP, it helps us because us we can really help distinguish it from other IP. I also think the media is way too quick to generalize. So yes, Superhero movies haven't done quite as well. But if you look like one example, Fantastic Four, this was the best Fantastic Four in the franchise ever. So I think you have to scratch a little below the numbers to see what's really going on. And who would have thought that this year, Horror, I guess that's another example like Conjuring opens next week. It's tracking extremely well and final destination, which Warner did really well. And Sinners did really well. So I think people's taste change, obviously, Westerns used to be a big deal and they're not anymore. So I think the studios are just going to be flexible and understand that they need to go in different directions.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#28

Right. And you -- over the years, you've experimented with a lot of different kinds of content. I mean you mentioned earlier, some of the concerts, prints and the rolling stones, et cetera. You've done live events, you've done some sporting stuff, you have experimented. Can you -- what's been successful and how big of an opportunity is this for IMAX?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#29

So as I said, I was really surprised by League of Legends. By the way, we not only sold out, but at a higher ticket price than the regular IMAX ticket price. But the other thing that was good about it was it brought a completely different audience in who learned what IMAX was. So they came back presumably to do other things. This recent run of films we just did. So we did prints over a couple of days of rerelease and we did $2 million this weekend on it. This week -- prior weekend is a really interesting example. We did about close to $15 million over the weekend, and we did $3 million on a 50-year-old movie Steven Spielberg's Jaws. I was worried about it because I thought the Shark might not look so good, 6 stories high, but apparently, it looked okay. And then we did the Sinner movie, we brought back Formula One, which still has playtime in it and did well. There were 3 or 4 local language movies together. But as a way to give you context, this year was really a rapid change we've been building to this year. And IMAX was on a great trajectory until the pandemic came and then obviously, the pandemic affected us. And last year was -- '24 was our best domestic box office ever. So it's not like this is overnight, but it's been happening over time in this way. And we shifted our focus a little bit to how to program these theaters a little bit better than just blockbuster films coming out that weekend. We have a different philosophy about doing it. So our original budget for this weekend was $4.4 million, our internal budget. And we did $15 million. So I'm using that as an example of just how much our business has changed and the way we're managing it has changed.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#30

Diversified portfolio. So given the strength -- I have to ask this question because everyone has to ask an AI question. But I mean given the strength of your brand, the reputation is the most premium offering with leading technology, what are the opportunities and the challenges of AI for IMAX. Then just maybe talk a little bit about how you're currently integrating AI in the business and how you think that might even change over time?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#31

So the most obvious example, which we're doing is just how to make our business systems better. So whether it's how to make programming decisions by getting more data and analyzing more deeply how things play, you'd kind of be surprised or maybe you wouldn't be by how data a lot of the analytics are. Well, we're playing a film that's kind of similar to Mission Impossible 2. So it will do the same as Mission Impossible 2. But you could use AI tools to be a lot more sophisticated than that and we're doing that. We monitor every IMAX theater in the world in real time. So whether you're in Shanghai or you're in St. Louis. When you go to an IMAX theater, we know how whether the bulb is getting old, we know whether the sound is loud enough. I know a lot of people think IMAX, wow, it's a brand, how exciting, use your brand. But it's -- the brand is the sum of the parts. The brand isn't something that exists outside. But we get tons of real-time data, and we're trying to figure out ways to better capture that data and could we control our inventory better by understanding something is going to break 2 months from now, so save costs. We're obviously using it the way a lot of other companies are in the finance area, finance marketing. And then we're using it in the image enhancement area to some extent. But remember, we don't only film with our cameras, but we take other content, and we blow it up. And obviously, Jaws would be one example. It wasn't filmed last week. And there are a lot of tools out there that help you clean it up again, as I said, I was really personally afraid of what that chart would look like but there are a lot of tools available that can make it better. And then, of course, there's a whole question of the software aspect and what it does to filmmaking. And I know there's a lot of controversy over what role it's going to play. And I would say, we're not trying to invent new allocations but we're -- we pay close attention to it and where it's going and how it's going to change filmmaking. And actually, I was on the set of the Mandalorian, the new Star Wars movie, that Jon Favreau is using in. And by the way it's not AI, but the way they have new tools that can help film and IMAX version at the same time you can film a regular theatrical version is completely different than you could have done years ago. For those of you who don't know, we have a different aspect ratio. So IMAX is much more vertical than the letter box and horizontal. So you would take one version and then you would blow it up or you wouldn't. And Favreau and the Disney team invented a tool ironically, they'll talk more about this using the Vision Pro, where at the same time, he could shoot an IMAX version to a different aspect ratio and shoot a regular version. So these kinds of tools of filmmakers, whether they're strictly AI or they're more coming out of the innovation that's coming out I think will help us further differentiate our content.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#32

Okay. So in the less than a minute we have left, I just want to -- I have to ask the question, but as you look out over the next 12 months or through '26, what are you most excited about? What do you think the surprise will be?

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#33

So those are 2 different questions. What are we excited about? And what could the surprise be? So you cannot be excited about Odyssey. It's the first film ever shot completely with IMAX cameras, and we spent a fair amount of money and we developed a new generation of cameras, which has a lot more features and is much more flexible. And the principal photography is pretty much done. And as you know, the cast is like red carpet in itself. And Chris' track record in Emma is obviously quite enviable. So very excited about that. For this year, very excited about Avatar. I've seen, I don't know, 20 minutes of the footage and I think it's dumb to bet against Jim Cameron. I think he -- guy knows what he's doing and extremely excited about that. And then again, next year, the new Star Wars movie coming out really excited about. And then surprise ones, I'm trying to think about that this year, my pick was Formula One. And I think it was the surprise of this year. I'm just not going to go out there, Jess, because I hate to -- and as you know, I like saying whatever I think, whatever the consequences. But I just think it's a little too early to say what it's going to be, but there are a lot of kind of original content. And again, I'm not naming these, but one of them like Amazon MGM is do a Hail Mary, which has gotten a lot of positive views around it. And I think Disney always comes up like this year it was Lilo and Stitch, they always have things that you haven't thought about it before. And how could you bet against Warner with the Winning Street they're on right now. And I've looked at some of the Paramount stuff coming. So I'm quite sure there will be, but it's too early to identify them.

Jessica Reif Cohen

analyst
#34

Great. With that, we're totally out of time. But thank you so much.

Richard L. Gelfond

executive
#35

Okay. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete IMAX Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to IMAX Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.