IMI plc (IMI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 26, 2021

London Stock Exchange GB Industrials Machinery earnings 90 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's IMI Plc 2020 Preliminary Results Call. My name is Jordan, and I'll be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions] I'm now going to hand over to Mr. Roy Twite to begin. Roy, please go ahead.

Roy Twite

executive
#2

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to our 2020 results presentation. I am joined this morning by Dan Shook. I'm pleased to report 2020 results that demonstrated both real operational resilience in testing times and the early promise of an evolving and ambitious business model for growth. The energy, the enormous commitment of our employees continues to make me very proud to be a part of IMI. A more customer-focused organization, the restructuring projects to reduce complexity and our rapid response to the temporary surge in ventilator demand helped us to improve our overall profits by 9% and improved margins in all 3 divisions. We continue to invest for the future, particularly with our growth accelerator initiative, which is building a culture of market-led innovation right across IMI. Based on the current conditions and assuming no worsening impact from coronavirus outbreaks, we would expect IMI's adjusted earnings per share to be between 75p and 82p for 2021. Okay. Let me now pass over to Dan to take you through the financial detail.

Daniel Shook

executive
#3

Thank you, Roy, and good morning, everyone. I'm very pleased to be able to take you through the full year results today. Our results reflect another resilient operational performance with cash delivery particularly strong. We continue to reshape and invest in the business for growth. You will see on this slide the detail of our results on both an adjusted and organic constant currency basis. Regarding the impact of foreign exchange, although volatile during the year, FX had a relatively limited impact on our overall results. We did benefit from the full year of ownership of PBM, which we acquired in September 2019. On an organic basis, group revenue of GBP 1.8 billion decreased 4%, reflecting the weakness in some of our end markets during the year, which was only partly offset by the surge in ventilator valve sales. Including the full year of PBM, revenue declined 3%. Adjusted operating profit of GBP 285 million was 5% higher on an organic basis versus 2019 or 7% higher when including PBM and currency. Corporate costs of GBP 29 million were flat versus 2019 due to the structural and temporary savings achieved during the year, being offset by costs in support of our growth initiatives. The group's profit margin for the year at 15.6% was 140 basis points higher than last year, with margin improvements achieved by all 3 divisions despite the extraordinary market conditions. Regarding temporary cost savings, our total benefit for the year was GBP 25 million as the improving market conditions in the second half meant a reversal of some employee cost savings from the first half. Our expectation is that in 2021, roughly GBP 17 million of the GBP 25 million will come back into the business. So moving to the detailed income statement. Our net interest expense decreased by GBP 4 million as a result of our reduced borrowings and rates as well as a one-off interest credit in the year related to a tax refund. Restructuring costs, including impairment losses, totaled GBP 38 million in the year, and I'll provide more detail on the next slide. There were no special pension events in the year but we continue to actively manage our positions in both the U.K. and abroad. I've included in the appendix, our summary pension slide, where you'll see that the U.K. scheme increased its surplus position further during the year to GBP 69 million. The acquired intangible and other acquisition charge decreased to GBP 19 million, following the first year one-off charges from the recent PBM acquisition. This slide provides an update on our restructuring activities as we continue to make the investments necessary to reduce complexity and reposition the business for growth. Benefits of GBP 33 million in 2020 were ahead of what we expected, largely driven by better delivery within Critical. For 2020, our charge, excluding corporate, was slightly below expectations of GBP 39 million, driven by better execution and some deferral of activity into 2021, mostly due to COVID. For 2021, we currently anticipate a charge of roughly GBP 59 million, which includes the continuation of precision activities and additional actions now planned in Critical. Benefits in 2021 are estimated at GBP 15 million. As you can see on the slide, we continue to expect our overall activity to deliver a payback of inside 2 years. So moving to operating cash flow. You will see that we delivered another year of good working capital management in 2020. The inflow of GBP 15 million is supported by reduced trading, but also reflects our continued focus on debtor management, where our team successfully worked down age receivables. Debtor days improved by 4 during the year. Inventories were increased slightly to protect customer service in light of the current market uncertainties and to ensure we are prepared for any rapid demand increases in our end markets. Capital expenditure of GBP 51 million was significantly lower than 2019, reflecting a conscious effort to preserve our cash during the pandemic. We continue to see good capital investment opportunities within our existing businesses, as they progress the growth agendas. So expect CapEx to return to historic levels of between GBP 60 million and GBP 70 million going forward. Overall, adjusted operating cash flow was up 12% at GBP 335 million. Regarding net cash flow, you'll see that our operating cash enabled IMI to more than cover its investments and other commitments during the year. This includes absorbing an adverse currency impact on our debt, largely due to the December year-over-year strengthening of the euro versus sterling. Our cash outflow for adjusting items increased to GBP 37 million in 2020, in line with restructuring activity. The cash outflow for dividends reduced to GBP 92 million as a result of the decision last year to reset the coverage ratio and preserve capital for growth. Net debt decreased to GBP 316 million at the end of December, which, combined with our improved business results, meant that our key financing metric net debt-to-EBITDA improved versus 2009 to 0.8x. So getting into the detailed performance of each division, starting with Precision. Revenue of GBP 877 million was 3% lower on both an adjusted and organic basis. Our Motion Control and Commercial Vehicle businesses saw declines in the year of 11% and 25%, respectively, following the underlying market indices. Both business units delivered sequential quarterly improvement in sales and orders in the second half, again, following their respective indices. The Fluid Technologies business grew by 24% in the year due to the crucial work done within our life sciences team to support the production of life-saving ventilators around the world. Overall, the ventilator valve surge provided GBP 94 million of incremental sales in 2020. At the close of the year, there were about 10 million of extraordinary ventilator orders remaining for shipment in 2021. So the expectation at this point is for Precision to have a net GBP 84 million revenue headwind in 2021 as the ventilator market normalizes. Operating profit of GBP 151 million was higher than 2019, reflecting the impact of rationalization benefits, which offset the effects of lower volumes in the year. Overall, margins increased by 100 basis points to 17.3%, solid results for Beth and the team. In terms of outlook and based on current market conditions and no worsening impact from COVID, the revenue gap from ventilators is expected to be largely offset by growth within the Motion Control and Commercial vehicle businesses which will lead to a slightly lower revenue in 2021. Margins are expected to be flat to slightly down as rationalization benefits will be offset by the reversal of 2020 temporary savings and the mix effect of reduced Life Science sales. Next up is Critical Engineering. Order input for the year at GBP 659 million was 8% lower on an organic basis as both new Construction and Aftermarket field service activities were adversely impacted by the effects of the pandemic. The division was able to deliver good growth in Aftermarket upgrade valves by focusing on solving identified operational problems being experienced by both existing and new customers. These orders provide good initial margins and then added to our installed base and future parts opportunity. So looking at each segment individually, Oil & Gas orders of GBP 134 million were up 9% and were supported by GBP 58 million of new construction LNG orders as well as double-digit growth in parts. Refining and Petrochemical orders of GBP 177 million were down 20%, reflecting reduced new build activity and constrained maintenance budgets in the year. Power orders of GBP 190 million were up 5%, with new construction growing by 24% as a result of project wins in gas-fired and concentrated solar power stations. Note that new construction coal orders totaled only GBP 16 million in the year, now less than 3% of division order activity. Our Aftermarket was slightly lower as reductions in field service due to COVID offset growth in gas parts and upgrades. Aftermarket orders for coal parts were largely flat in the year at GBP 37 million. We continue to benefit from our installed base, of which over 60% is located in favorable geographies. We expect resilience in this business given our footprint is skewed toward larger, more efficient plants, mainly in Asia. Marine orders of GBP 33 million were lower than last year, which was expected as a result of the multiyear order received in 2019. This remains a highly attractive part of Critical's portfolio which will provide long-term growth, given its expanding product offering and geographic reach. Nuclear orders increased 38% in the year to GBP 78 million. Over 90% of activity here is Aftermarket. We are benefiting from investment to install the latest technologies into older nuclear power facilities to significantly extend the lives of those assets. Again, great upgrade wins, which extend our addressable Aftermarket. Overall, Critical ended 2020 with an order book of GBP 522 million, which is up 1% compared to the beginning of the year. Margins in the order book are 140 basis points higher than the prior year, largely due to a further mix shift toward the higher-margin aftermarket, in line with the strategy. So looking now at revenue, Critical sales of GBP 643 million were 4% lower on an organic basis, and when including the impact of PBM and currency, 1% lower on an adjusted basis when compared to 2019. New Construction sales of GBP 309 million were 7% higher, as strong growth in LNG, downstream and petchem and marine more than offset the decline in coal power. Aftermarket sales of GBP 334 million were 12% lower, reflecting the impact of site restrictions, on-field service and some maintenance deferrals, particularly within refining and pet chem. Despite the revenue fall in the year, operating profit of GBP 107 million reflected a 14% increase on an organic basis. Jackie and his team delivered significant structural improvements to the division footprint during the year. They also continue to shift engineering expertise toward more attractive markets and opportunities, including some developed through our sprint teams. Margins in 2020 were 16.6%, an increase of 280 basis points versus 2019. In terms of outlook, given the opening order book and based on current market conditions and no worsening impact from COVID, the division expects to achieve broadly flat revenue and profits during 2021 when compared to 2020. Turning now to Hydronic. Revenue of GBP 305 million was 4% lower on an organic basis. Growth was achieved in Hydronics core German market, which was offset by declines elsewhere. In the year, the division effectively managed both the sharp decline in volumes in Q2 and a rebound in activity thereafter, as construction site access and installer activity were heavily affected by the pandemic. Like Precision, Hydronics saw a sequential quarterly improvement in the second half. Good progress has also been made within Hydronics simplification project, which is on track to deliver benefits of GBP 3 million by the end of 2021 as well as a significant improvement to customer service and delivery. The main elements of this project have already been executed. Operating profit of GBP 56 million was slightly lower than last year as the division limited the drop-through impact from lower sales to 25% plus got a little help from currency. As a result, margins improved by 30 basis points to 18.3%. You'll recall that the division's margins were 15.9% back in 2017. And since then, Phil and his team have successfully refocused the division toward profitable growth. Regarding outlook, based on current market conditions and no worsening impact from COVID, we expect some organic revenue growth in the year with margins slightly higher than 2020. So before turning to the outlook for the group, I'd like to quickly point out a few more slides in the appendix of this presentation. Along with the pension slide previously mentioned, you'll also find our normal currency ready reckoner summary as well as a reconciliation of 2019 full year Precision sales and Critical orders based on our 2020 classifications. We also included a simple indicative earnings bridge to remind you of the main moving parts between 2020 and 2021. With that, let me finish with the outlook for the group for 2021. Based on current market conditions and assuming no worsening impact from COVID, we expect the group to deliver 2021 adjusted earnings per share of between 75p and 82p. Within this is an expected 3% headwind on sales and profits from currency based on forecast average rates for 2021 of [ $1.37 ] and EUR 1.14. So let me now hand back to Roy for an update on strategic initiatives.

Roy Twite

executive
#4

Thank you, Dan. This next section of our presentation explains how IMI's business model is evolving. It's becoming ever more customer-focused and creating much more market-led innovation. As a reminder, in 2019, we launched our new purpose, breakthrough engineering for a better world. In 2020, we added our new values, which underpin everything we do. In many ways, these values build on our past while looking to the future, specifically, the new values of customer intimacy, one big team, plan to win and integrity. All of these values are a statement of intent, an intent to create a business that competes on differentiation, adding real value to our customers by solving their problems and generating a high-margin, high-returns business model for IMI. We are also addressing how to generate growth. IMI certainly remains capable of growing faster than its markets. In addition, some legacy markets that have previously slowed progress now offer far less downside risk than they once did. The common characteristics across every part of IMI include a collaborative and engaged team, focused on delivering for our customers. This is an organization with real depth of knowledge of fluid and motion control engineering, underpinned by strong ESG motivation and credentials. What has become clear is the opportunity to increase the level of engagement and collaboration at every single level of the business. The latent potential that is being unlocked is very encouraging. Our business model is evolving to enable IMI to create both value today as well as value tomorrow, both, of course, are absolutely crucial to us. For IMI, value today is all about excellent customer service, reducing complexity and relentlessly improving efficiencies. Value tomorrow will come from market-led innovation, mainly from our new growth hub initiatives. These include the Foresight and Growth Accelerator sprint teams in each division, developing new products that are focused on solving acute customer problems. This next slide illustrates how the divisions are creating value today, improving our customer service, sharpening our competitive edge and improving returns to investors. Precision created the Friends in Adversity campaign for customers including those customers who are struggling to find high volumes of micro proportional valves for ventilators or struggling to find the engineering capability within their suppliers to design and build fluid control manifold systems for their latest analytical equipment. Precision engineering solved those complex customer problems in 2020 and also ramped up ventilator valve production 10x, saving lives and broadening its business relationships and business opportunities in the process. To reduce complexity, Precision consolidated 4 factories in the last 18 months, reducing manufacturing costs and helping to deliver GBP 20 million of structural savings in 2020. Critical enhanced its digital configurators, slimmed down the new construction project offering and increased best cost country sourcing to cut its cost to serve for customers. The effect on the division has been significant, improving margins and sharpening competitiveness, which in turn has maintained Critical's very high win rates and increased the installed base for the future. Hydronic also restructured in 2020, stripping out complexity by combining 3 European warehouses into one, moving assembly to its Polish sites and closing manufacturing in Slovenia. Reducing this complexity is improving returns and will facilitate growth, while the digital customer club built during the COVID lockdowns has improved customer loyalty and provided insight for new products. All 3 divisions have also invested in creating value for tomorrow, allocating more time and more resource than I can remember in my more than 30 years with IMI. Precision found that thousands of machine shops are incurring inefficiencies due to long machining setup times, slow part changeover times and large space requirements for fixture storage. To solve the problem, Precision have invented a brand-new way of fixturing parts packed with IP. That solution promises significant efficiencies to our customers who adopt it. The Critical Foresight team led the group investigation into the hydrogen value chain and found many potential applications for IMI, opportunities that are now being investigated by Critical, by Precision and by cross-divisional teams. Critical also delivered GBP 6 million of high-margin orders from its growth accelerator program in 2020. Please remember that Critical are about 12 months ahead of the other 2 divisions with this growth accelerator program and now believe that they can deliver about GBP 20 million of new business from this program in 2021. So this is starting to become very significant for our future growth. The Hydronic team have created a new digital smart valve, which is at the heart of their system to enable customers to achieve an optimum level of comfort and energy efficiency through much greater digital connectivity. We are building our digital capability right across IMI, creating digital customer communities, building intelligence into our products and generating better reliability and higher productivity for our customers. While we are pleased with these individual examples, the most important thing is that we are creating a culture of customer focus, a culture of market-led innovation and ultimately of growth. This next slide is our usual bridge to our margin targets. All 3 divisions are executing well on their restructuring programs with the benefits dropping to the bottom line. Precision has now consolidated 4 factories, reducing complexity to accelerate the division's future growth. We have clear sight in Precision of the GBP 14 million of additional annual savings that are still to be delivered to hit its GBP 35 million target. Once Precision has completed their GBP 80 million restructuring program, the division will be very well positioned to deliver 20% margins at the top of the next cycle as opposed to the 16.7% margins it produced at the top of the last cycle in 2018. Critical made excellent progress on its cost base in 2020 and took a significant step towards its 17% to 20% margin target. As I said at the IMS in November, I'm now confident that we will get towards the middle of that range for Critical. The restructuring plan for Hydronic was completed successfully, and we now have 1 European warehouse instead of 3. We also have a much more consolidated manufacturing base. We expect a GBP 3 million benefit from this supply chain optimization program and for Hydronic to show further progress towards the 20% margin target in 2021. We are also building on our strong ESG foundations. In 2020, accidents reduced by 9%, and we received our highest ever employee satisfaction score for keeping our people safe in COVID at 85%. IMI is an organization which is getting stronger. It's getting more inclusive and more diverse. Last year, we hired our most graduates ever, 35 future leaders from 10 countries, with over half of the intake women for the very first time in our long history. I'm sure that you know that IMI is already AA rated by MSCI. And today, we are announcing our commitment to halve the carbon intensity from our factories by 2030. So in summary, 2020 was clearly an incredibly challenging year, but also a year that revealed the very best in IMI. It was a year in which IMI has demonstrated resilience, demonstrated ambition and an absolute commitment to supporting each other, our customers and our wider communities. Employee engagement and customer satisfaction scores are improving. Profits were up 9% in 2020, and margins improved in all 3 divisions. At the same time, we are increasing our investments in growth. IMI Critical is picking up early orders from the growth accelerator program, and we now have over 20 sprint teams working across IMI to create more innovation in attractive markets. And finally, we expect further strategic progress in 2021, continued complexity reduction, enhanced customer satisfaction and an acceleration of our growth accelerated program of market-led innovation. Okay. With that, I think we are now ready to take your questions, please.

Operator

operator
#5

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Max Yates of Crédit Suisse.

Max Yates

analyst
#6

My first question was just around the portfolio. And I just wanted to get an update on how you're thinking about the 20% to 30% of Critical that was under review? Whether you think there's potentially a solution and a potential disposal there in 2021? And maybe more broadly, do you think, given the progress you've made towards the targets that it's maybe the right time to start thinking a bit more broadly about the portfolio and whether there's any sort of areas that, that review can be extended? I just want to get your views on those. That was my first question.

Roy Twite

executive
#7

Thanks, Max. Yes. Yes. I think let's start with Critical, right? Well, first thing to say is that Jackie, the whole Critical team have just done a fantastic job and a huge step forward to getting Critical back into the sort of 17% to 20% margin range. And I think the most important thing is when you think about the 20% to 30% of Critical that was under review, clearly, their sales profits, their margins and crucially, their order books, they've all moved sharply in the right direction. And obviously, they're far less of a drag now on the Critical division than they were. So overall, I think, especially given the restrictions that were in a COVID year, where our people couldn't travel as much, customers couldn't travel to our sites to do their normal approvals as much, supply chains were disrupted, I thought it was just tremendous progress. Still on the 20% to 30%, the jury is still out. They're still not at the 17% to 20% margins, although they've made fantastic progress. And I know that Jackie has still got them under intense review, and we'll see how they progress from here. In terms of the broader portfolio, no, I'm generally pleased. We had a very broad-based improvement across all 3 divisions. Again, given the issues around COVID and everything we had to deal with, I was pleased with all 3 divisions and what they managed to achieve last year. So I would say, no, in terms of the rest of the portfolio, I'm actually more confident that we're going to achieve the margin targets than I was. And beyond that, what we're looking to do as you know Max is really generate growth through the market-led innovation program. And we had a review yesterday even of 3 teams, 3 sprint teams. And some of the areas they're looking at within hydrogen, hydrogen carrier, hydrogen use actually and dispense using the regulation technology within Precision. But then more broadly, in terms of [ future foods ], in terms of areas like district heating, the use of digital. I mean, it's just tremendously exciting. And as I said in the presentation, we've now got more than 20 teams across IMI, all working in attractive markets. And the early proof of that is the GBP 6 million of new orders within Critical last year, which, as I said, we expect to build to more like GBP 20 million just within Critical this year. So I hope that answers your question, Max?

Max Yates

analyst
#8

Yes. That's helpful. And maybe just a quick follow-up. Obviously, order book is -- the order book has held up well in Critical. Could you just comment on how you're seeing pricing and margins in that order book as we go into 2021? And do you see kind of as we think about the areas in Critical orders that are likely -- more likely to pick up than areas that aren't? How could that affect the average margin in the order book, i.e., are more profitable areas likely to pick up in 2021 as you see it today for Critical?

Roy Twite

executive
#9

Yes. I mean, the short answer is, yes, Max. What we see is 3 areas really of growth in Critical, in terms of orders I'm talking about now for this year. The first is Aftermarket. And as I presented back in November 2019, the strategy for Critical very acute focus on the Aftermarket, driving aftermarket in terms of new technology, as I explained on the last call, using 3D printing to get in there and do upgrade valves on the installed base, which then generates more parts business. But a real focus on upgrade valves. And upgrade valves actually were up again last year. So we do see more opportunity in the Aftermarket, to grow the Aftermarket and as you rightly said, that's a huge profit driver, both immediately, but also in terms of the future revenues that we generate from that installed base from the parts business. That's the first one. The second one is Marine. That Marine segment has gone from GBP 20 million a year. This year, we'll do about GBP 50 million in that. That's a nice profitable business, complex technology going into nuclear submarines. So we're pleased with that. And then the third area, of course, is a rebound because downstream oil and gas had a tough year in terms of orders last year as you can see from the slide that Dan presented. And we do expect that to come back this year. Obviously, oil price is recovering, customers are starting to look to spend a bit more, and we think downstream will be a good area of rebound. So the short answer is yes, we see some good growth opportunity in Critical. And as I also said, we also expect that the innovation program will move from sort of GBP 6 million of orders last year to more like GBP 20 million this year as several of those projects are going into their scale-up phase. We've got the value proposition. We've proven it because we've got orders, but now it's about scaling it up. So the short answer is yes, Max.

Operator

operator
#10

Our next question comes from Alexander Virgo of Bank of America.

Alexander Virgo

analyst
#11

Just if you could give us a little bit of color on how the year has started in Precision, I guess, ex the ventilator business, we're obviously trying to understand how strong or how much the motion control and truck businesses can compensate? So any comments and color you can give around that, particularly regionally, would be really helpful?

Roy Twite

executive
#12

Yes. I mean, I think, Alex, certainly the year -- we finished well. Let's start with that in terms of Commercial Vehicles, right? We actually went into growth year-on-year in the fourth quarter, which was obviously a big sequential build. And I know you guys have all got the public numbers for CV. So yes, CV responding quickly. It's interesting, isn't it because obviously, last year, we were managing costs very tightly in the most recent reviews with Beth in Precision. It's all been about looking through supply chains, making sure we're ahead of the bottlenecks in CV and making sure that we're ready to respond, and we are responding effectively. So CV coming into the year, I would say, strongly, Alex. Motion control was about minus 7%, I think, Dan in the fourth quarter. But building strongly in terms of demand. And that's why, Alex, we think that if you take the ventilator surge, we'll probably be on ventilators GBP 80 million to GBP 85 million down in terms of sales this year because of that surge last year, but we think that nearly all of that will be recovered through Commercial Vehicle and Motion Control.

Operator

operator
#13

Our next question comes from Andrew Wilson of JPMorgan.

Andrew Wilson

analyst
#14

Maybe just a couple of quick ones. Just on the Critical margin, Roy, you kind of -- yourself and Dan talked a little bit around some of the drivers of that, but it was significantly better than certainly I was expecting. I guess interested if you can provide us a little bit more detail on kind of some of the specifics? And also, I guess, whether it was a surprise from your side as well, i.e., sort of Jackie and the team, I guess, delivering ahead of even where we were planning kind of quite late in the year by the looks of it?

Roy Twite

executive
#15

Yes. Thanks, Andy. Yes, I mean, COVID environment Andy in a project-based business is super tough, right? Because I think, as you all know, the last thing you normally have to do on a project is get the customer to validate the final test. And for that, normally, they have to visit your site. Obviously, we adapted as many customers as we could to using video digital technology to do the sign-offs. But not every customer is prepared to do that. And traveling became, as you know, a major issue. COVID cases went up a lot, particularly in Europe and the U.S. at the end of the year. And it was a really tough environment with a lot of uncertainty. Despite that, Jackie and the team managed to ship over GBP 100 million again in December. So yes, it was, if you like, a pleasant surprise, it certainly wasn't our middle case -- our base case, call it, Andy, but they absolutely delighted us. And I can't thank the Critical team enough for in a very tough environment doing what they did. So I would say that is good news. On the margin front, I mean, Critical, has remember, consolidated from 26 factories, including some ones that weren't the best in terms of customer service and culture down to 16 and 16 pretty much first-class factories with good process. Most of them have now got, vast majority, have got one instance of ERP, which we put in at a rate of 2 factories every 6 months, we were going for it. And Jackie has really taken those investments and he's maximizing productivity and efficiency and project management effectiveness from those investments. So it is a really good, I call it, a first-class project management business. And of course, what he's now done is really focused on the Aftermarket as well using the CRM system to really drive Aftermarket activity. And of course, Aftermarket orders, despite all the disruption and certainly, field service being under pressure last year, ended up flat on the year with a very strong fourth quarter. Obviously, there's some catch-up in there. But you all know that, that Aftermarket mix and that platform is so essential to strong margins in Critical. And on top of that, they delivered every single pound of the restructuring benefits to the bottom line. So I think all of that, plus there was a -- overall mix was obviously adverse in terms of Aftermarket, as you can see from Dan's presentation. But in terms of the rest of the mix, it was positive because, a bit back to Max's question, we had shipped most of the water orders, which we took those orders to pay for overheads, but we've been completely transparent. So they weren't great in terms of margin, but those orders have been replaced with Aftermarket orders, with good quality LNG orders, as you know, Andy, and with a much stronger order book in terms of areas like Marine. So the mix actually did help offset some of the costs that came through. So yes, first-class performance all around, I would say, Andy.

Andrew Wilson

analyst
#16

Maybe, I guess, a follow-up a different question, a different area. But in terms of the various initiatives, which you talk about, whether it be the sprint teams, et cetera, and driving the growth. How should we think about the necessary investment to drive some of that activity? I mean, is this incremental investment? Or is this similar levels of investment that's being used perhaps more effectively than they were historically? Just trying to sort of gauge where we are in terms of necessary additional investment or not, I guess?

Roy Twite

executive
#17

Yes. I mean certainly, the first phase has all been about using our existing resources much more effectively. So instead of creating incrementally better products. So taking a precision valve and incrementally making it better. Of course, we need to do that. We need to do value engineering and those things. And all of that continuous improvement continues. But this program is more about solving fundamental customer problems through engineering. So the 3D printing example in Critical is an excellent one. So that team, they first found a piece of customer insight. And that's the way it works. Find a customer problem. And that particular customer problem was that, believe it or not, 92% of outages in power plants in North America were unplanned. And obviously, a fair proportion of those were caused by cavitation, vibration problems in the system that we can solve. Obviously, that's what we do, right? Fluid control at very high pressures, very high temperatures that critical engineering capability from the valve doctors has absolutely been a core competence of Critical engineering for decades. And so that's an example of where we then applied a new technology to solve a problem and have created a whole new value stream, and that's now scaling up. And I think it may hit -- they might have been GBP 2 million, GBP 2.5 million, something like that will be orders of the GBP 6 million the Critical goal. So that has been applying teams that were doing incremental work to what I would call breakout engineering -- breakthrough engineering for a better world. That's what it's all about. Over time, what I've always said, Andy, is that once we get into those margin target areas, we're not going to look to expand the margins much more. What we're going to do is put back the extra drop-through that comes from increased complexity reduction. So there are more opportunities to take more complexity out of the business that comes from extra volume drop through. We're going to look to invest that back into more sprint teams and increase the growth rate further. So that's the overall game plan. We still see opportunity to pay for the sprint teams -- more sprint teams through things like general SG&A reduction, some more transactional SG&A reduction, particularly in Precision. So yes, plenty of opportunity to refocus the money that we're spending in higher growth activities.

Daniel Shook

executive
#18

And Roy, I think we're already starting to do it as those temporary savings we got this year as they come back, some of that will shift. Some of the marketing and those aspects get away from the traditional and more into the digital and some of the areas that will really support those sprint teams.

Roy Twite

executive
#19

Yes. Yes, absolutely. I mean you mentioned in your presentation, Dan, but things like the digital customer club, the Hydronics built, I mean first class, and that is really generating both customer stickiness, but also getting us faster customer insight in terms of being able to generate new growth programs, Andy.

Operator

operator
#20

Our next question comes from Jonathan Hurn of Barclays.

Jonathan Hurn

analyst
#21

Just 2 questions, please, on Critical. If I look at the order book margin within that, you're saying it's up 140 basis points. Got sort of GBP 7 million of rationalization benefits coming through to that division in 2021? And also, you're saying that Aftermarket is starting to see a recovery, particularly in field service. So on the back of that, why is the guidance profits flat in 2021? Surely, you should see a little bit of improvement. So just a bit of color there would be helpful, please?

Roy Twite

executive
#22

Yes. No, it's good, Jonathan. I'm glad it's nice to speak to you. Haven't seen each other for a while. But no, don't forget you've got GBP 7 million of temporary costs coming back in. So you probably remember, Jonathan, from the last call, we thought that the sort of temporary savings last year would be around GBP 30 million. They actually ended up a bit lower because the fourth quarter was so strong in terms of activity. So they ended up at about GBP 25 million when we did the final books. Of the GBP 25 million, GBP 17 million are coming back into this year, which is all reflected in our outlook and all compensated for through other activities. Roughly, Jonathan, GBP 7 million is coming back into Precision, GBP 7 million into Critical and then the balance obviously into Hydronic.

Jonathan Hurn

analyst
#23

That's clear. Okay. And then the second question was just on -- the second question was just on sort of the LNG side of that business. Obviously, GBP 58 million of revenue from that in 2020. What's the outlook going into 2021 for that side of the business, please?

Roy Twite

executive
#24

Yes, it's interesting, isn't it? Because LNG, yes, I think our orders were up over 50% last year. So that was really good. Our win rates were really good, Jonathan. Pleased with what we're doing on LNG. I am -- this year is going to be interesting because there are definitely projects that you know about. One is in the Middle East, on the Compression side, the export terminal side, obviously, but also in China, on the receiving side, China is still building receiving terminals. So there's quite a lot of activity going on. I think our orders this year in LNG will depend on how fast those projects progress. And it's a bit early days, but there's some that could -- orders that could fall into the end of this year, which would leave our orders, I would say, reasonably flat on last year or they could just drop into the first half of next year. And I think we'll have to sort of update you throughout the year, really, Jonathan, to give you that. But yes, there's certainly LNG activity ongoing at the moment, which is quite encouraging, I would say.

Operator

operator
#25

Our next question comes from Robert Davies of Morgan Stanley.

Robert Davies

analyst
#26

I had a couple. One was, again, just on the Critical business. I noticed across, I think it was oil and gas refining and your power businesses. OE growth was much stronger than Aftermarket. Just wondered how much of an influence that's going to be on sales this year in terms of the mix plan between the 2 parts of the business versus savings? Just if you could kind of walk us through the makeup of that margin guide for Critical would be helpful? And then the second one was just sort of a bit more of a big picture view and thinking about Hydronic and the broader portfolio. What's your sort of latest thoughts on Hydronic where it fits? I know it's sort of sort of blowing in and out of favor and there's different sort of long-term trends and the EU Green Deal and all this kind of things? What's your sort of big picture view on Hydronic going forward?

Roy Twite

executive
#27

Yes. I'll talk about Hydronic, and then Dan can do the Critical bridge. Otherwise, I fell like I'm doing all the talking. On Hydronic, I mean, Hydronic has never ever fallen out of favor with me, but I think you know that, Robert, right? I mean I ran it for 3 or 4 years, back in the sort of mid-2000s. And it has fantastic characteristics, that business. It's got fantastic brands. Customer stickiness is very high because we train those customers for decades in terms of why our products are the best, how to apply them. We've obviously got the Hydronic college, which is full of people that can actually design and help design the hydronic system, heating and cooling system within complex buildings. And that creates pull, obviously, through the whole system. On top of that, Hydronics obviously saves something between 15% and 25% of the energy in a building by correctly balancing the building, using the thermostatic radiator valves. If you set all that up properly, you'll get a more comfortable indoor climate and you get the energy savings. And we can do that while saving capital costs because, again, if you balance, you need less pumps, you need less other parts of the system. So to me, it's just a fantastic business that we can definitely build on and Phil is creating a fantastic culture with the sprint teams and some of the young graduates that are coming in are now using digital technology. And one of the sprint teams, you will see, over time, has created not only a digital valve now. In fact, I've actually got [ air ] Robert, because Phil believe it or not sent it to me last week. So this is the first mockup of it but it's fully digital for the first time, is at the heart of its digital system. And it will enable the optimization and further energy savings within the circuit. So that, combined with the EU Green Deal, which all our modeling says it will provide a tailwind over the next few years, leaves us in pretty good shape. So I think super strong brands, our ability to bring through proper differentiated new product that really solves the customer problem, in line with the increasing legislation means that not only is this a 20% margin business, but it's going to create growth over time. And yes, certainly, it's in full favor with me, I would say, Robert.

Daniel Shook

executive
#28

And Robert, Phil's Smart, he set me one, too, so he's got me fully backed as well. Now it's great, great, great product. On the Critical side, I mean, Roy already mentioned the ins and outs of the temporary cost savings plus the restructuring and in terms of the orders and how that's going to play out, I think there's the element of field service that was definitely lower in 2020, which we're expecting some of that to come back. We're watching that book to ship level as well. And that mix element as we go through the year because a lot of that -- because a lot of that will play through will -- potentially, will hold the margins back a little bit. And that's why we're calling kind of margins flat despite the margins and the order book being up. As you know, it's a big book to ship gain there as we go through the year. So we'll watch and we'll update at the half year.

Robert Davies

analyst
#29

Maybe I could just squeeze in one more just for Roy. Maybe kind of taking a sort of a 5-year plus view, just be interested in what your sort of thinking would be in terms of the makeup of that Critical business? I know you've mentioned moving some parts out of that portfolio. But just I guess for some of the emerging technologies and things you're thinking about over a longer period of time, what would that Critical business look like in 5 years' time if you were to look forward?

Roy Twite

executive
#30

Yes. Thanks, Robert. Yes. I mean, it will be more Aftermarket. So the energy part of it, which is the bulk of it today, will be more Aftermarket. There's no doubt about it. In the gas installed base, in the LNG installed base, which you know, is nice profit streams for us. And the winning new construction, but also now and more importantly, really, doing what we're doing with the upgrade valve business. So that we not only win the installed base, but we get the parts afterwards. It will be the energy part will be much more focused on the aftermarket and therefore, more profitable, which is what gives me the confidence that it will step up to sort of between 17% and 20%. And then, of course, the new areas will be 5 years around that time, Robert, let's just say. Obviously, Marine will be growing. There's huge opportunities for us to grow in that business. The pharma part will be a much bigger part of that, and we see good development plans within pharma. And then beyond that, and I don't know whether it's 5 years, where it's material or it's 7 or something like that. But certainly, as I said, Jackie is leading the hydrogen initiative for the whole of IMI. And just yesterday, we had 3. So right at the beginning of our new process, effectively, we've got 4 site teams, right? And they do the initial work to really work out is there an opportunity in here for IMI in an attractive market space. And we have 3 just yesterday. And so I can see that hydrogen over time will obviously be a lot more significant for Critical than it is today. So I would say they're the areas that it will move towards, while still maximizing its opportunity in the Aftermarket.

Operator

operator
#31

Next question comes from Will Turner of Goldman Sachs.

William Turner

analyst
#32

Hope you're all doing well. I just want to ask on Precision Engineering and your outlook. And then just some more specific questions. When we look at the division, we take your comments around the life sciences, the GBP 85 million of orders for [ ventilator valves ]. And then also look at Commercial Vehicles, which the read across from some of the truck manufacturers points towards, you're going to have a pretty -- you should have a pretty good year in that business, at least in line with maybe 2019 and 2018. How come you're not guiding towards more sales growth? Are you expecting this division to grow organically? I assume it's one with quite big FX headwinds. And that's my first question. And then also just related -- because the difference is mainly going to be in the industrial automation part. When you look at that business, how do you think it sits competitively? From the sound of things, it hasn't significantly outperformed peers? What do you think you can do to improve the organic growth of that business?

Roy Twite

executive
#33

Yes. Good questions. So Will, I think just to answer your questions, obviously, it's early days. You know that Precision has a 3-month order book. There's a lot of volatility still out there, right? I mean certainly, in terms of our -- we measure our performance against our peers. And in terms of trucks, we're totally comfortable that we're well up with the peers. So there's certainly not an issue there. In terms of motion control and how we're going to grow that business? Well, Beth's coming in at number one, the sprint teams that we've got, as I said, we've got over 20 across IMI, and obviously, a big proportion of those are in Precision. And I have talked previously about, for instance -- and I don't want to get into too much detail because it's commercially sensitive, right? And I don't want to share all of these things before they've had a chance to have a real run at the market. But we have got some very clever industrial automation fixturing. It's unique. It's very flexible. And we will scale that business. And that's just one example, right? There's more digital. There's lots of excellent work going within the Precision sprint teams now. So that's for the longer term. And that will be highly differentiated innovation that, obviously, does not directly take on our bigger peers. It basically enables us to move into, let's call it, fast-growing market adjacencies with some very differentiated technology. In the shorter term for us, as I explained in November at the strategy presentation, for Precision and Motion Control, it competes on customer service, right? So its ability to quote faster, produce specials faster using applications engineering. That is right at the heart of its competitive age. And when you look at the win data in Precision, that supports, that's exactly how it wins. And so what Beth is doing on that front is sharpening our ability to compete in that way Will. So yes, we'll -- Precision has fantastic end markets. And absolutely, we'll outgrow those markets over time, definitely. I have no doubt about that.

Daniel Shook

executive
#34

I think you mentioned the currency as well. We'll watch and see if -- we did our numbers based on a 3% headwind, where currency is right now, might be more like 4%. And if you look at the truck indices, Will -- they were down 40% and up 40% year-over-year, but that doesn't get us back to 2019 levels, at least the way we see it in both the Americas and Europe. So it will recover, no doubt. But I don't think we're going to get back to truck production back to 2019 levels in 2021.

Roy Twite

executive
#35

Good point, Dan. We're certainly not modeling that. We might get back there. We hope we do, Will. But we're not modeling. ..

Daniel Shook

executive
#36

Yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#37

We're not putting our outlook based on that yet.

Daniel Shook

executive
#38

I'm doing my part with Amazon orders, but we'll see.

William Turner

analyst
#39

Yes. No, that's does. And then just a more broader kind of question. I mean, I'm quite encouraged by -- obviously, you're taking a strong focus on organic growth, and you've mentioned quite a few things that you're doing. So can we assume -- and for at least the time being, unless, obviously, a really attractive opportunity comes up at a reasonable price. But M&A is kind of taking a little bit of a back burner amongst your strategy at the moment in potential [indiscernible] ? Or are you still active in that space?

Roy Twite

executive
#40

Yes. I think, Will, the way I'd sort of characterize it is pretty much as we laid it out in that November presentation, right, that we wanted to get margin momentum, get the returns in the business moving in the right direction. We put, as you know, a pretty strict measure around total returns on invested capital. Nice to see that go back over 12% now. And as I've always said, the margins are a good internal, nice, simple measure for people to understand the sort of business that we want, the depth of customer relations we want, the level of differentiation in the technology. That's the business we want to be the high-quality business. So you can see that in that last 14 months, we -- every single update to you guys, we've been able to say we're making progress in those areas despite COVID and all of the disruption that's bringing. But then beyond that, the next thing is all about how do we really generate organic growth, has to be through market led innovation. That takes some time. But as I said, the early signs are, that's encouraging, as evidenced by Critical where we think Critical is going to go this year. And then the other 2 divisions, about 12 months, something like that behind. So yes, absolutely. We have also looked at acquisitions, but we absolutely stick to our hard lines on it, that we are not going to do things that won't at least achieve the cost of capital by year 3, right, at least. And well look at PBM, right? I mean, Jackie again has done a superb job with PBM. And actually, its returns exceeded our cost of capital in year 1. And that -- but that just shows you how disciplined we are even in a COVID year when obviously, volumes are under pressure for PBM because its customers were busy concentrating on things like vaccines quite rightly. Even with the volume reduction, it just about exceeded its cost of capital in terms of -- by year 1, right? So I'm delighted with what's happening there. And we always maintain that discipline. We are not going to buy things that are going to dramatically dilute our ambitions in terms of ROIC. So yes, but if some really good bolt-ons that could really accelerate our strategy that meet those financial conditions, then absolutely, we'll do them Will, yes.

Daniel Shook

executive
#41

Yes. And that's across all 3 divisions, Roy. They're interesting possibilities across all 3.

Roy Twite

executive
#42

Absolutely. We have at least a whole series per division that we're interested in. As I said, if they're available and at the right price, we'll definitely do it. Yes.

Daniel Shook

executive
#43

Yes.

Operator

operator
#44

Our next question comes from Edward Maravanyika of Citi.

Edward Maravanyika

analyst
#45

Just had 2 questions, please. Just as you talk about Critical being sort of being weighted towards Aftermarket, say in the next 5 years, what percentage currently of new construction do you win in terms of the aftermarket? And secondly, on refining and petrochems. I think it was a headwind last year. How have activities started this year? Has there been any response to the improvement in oil prices?

Roy Twite

executive
#46

Yes. Thanks, Ed. Well, improvement in oil prices, what we see in downstream is a better pipeline now of opportunity. And obviously, that's working with customers on their projects. And as you know, Ed, most of what we do in Critical is bespoke as a level of engineering, it's engineered to order. And so that pipeline looks a lot more encouraging in terms of its immediacy than it did 6 months ago, put it like that Ed. So yes, we're quite encouraged, I would say by that. In terms of Critical -- in terms of your Aftermarket question, obviously, you can see the order numbers, and you can see the Aftermarket, I think Dan was up to 55% of the orders last year or so?

Daniel Shook

executive
#47

Yes, yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#48

Yes. So you can see the way that that's tilting. If your question Ed is that do we get the Aftermarket when we win the new valve? The answer is mostly yes. The vast majority because of the nature of the applications that we serve, which are obviously critical, so it could be an LNG compressor, it could be the valve that goes in the catalytic cracker that actually the most critical valve right is working at 700 degrees C that's dealing with the silica catalyst. Because of the nature of what we do, yes, we tend to get the parts orders that come with it. And obviously, in nuclear, it's almost 100%, right, because of the regulations around nuclear. So yes, if that's your question. But has that answered your question properly, Ed?

Edward Maravanyika

analyst
#49

Yes.

Operator

operator
#50

The next question comes from Andrew Douglas of Jefferies.

Andrew Douglas

analyst
#51

Just a few quick ones for me, please. With regard to the temporary cost savings coming back in, you said that GBP 17 million of the GBP 25 million come back in 2021. Does the remaining GBP 8 million come back in '22? Or are they being turned into -- are they not coming back into the business because you can make them permanent? [ Tracking ] performance on working capital. Just wanted to quadruple check that that doesn't unwind in 2021. It feels like it shouldn't given the kind of limited top line growth we're assuming? And then just on a Aftermarket and [indiscernible] in particular, am I right in assuming that this is a huge pent-up demand opportunity for you guys, and it's now largely the -- that's going to be driven by the pace of the world kind of opening up and travel? Or is there more things that we need to think about there?

Roy Twite

executive
#52

Thanks, Andy. Gosh you're a little bit quick there. So working capital, Dan, I'm going to let you answer that one.

Daniel Shook

executive
#53

Yes. Yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#54

Aftermarket, in terms of the opportunity there, I'll take that one. And sorry, Andy, what was the first one?

Andrew Douglas

analyst
#55

The first one was the temporary cost savings, the GBP 8 million that we've kind of...

Roy Twite

executive
#56

Oh yes, temporary cost savings.

Andrew Douglas

analyst
#57

Does that come back in '22?

Daniel Shook

executive
#58

Does the GBP 8 million come to back in 2022?

Roy Twite

executive
#59

Yes. Let me -- I'll do temporary cost savings, Dan, then you can do working capital and then I'll finish up with the Aftermarket. So temporary cost savings, we'll obviously be reviewing in the budgets late this year, Andy. So a lot of that extra temporary cost saving is around things like travel. And clearly, it will all have to be justified, right? We want to see returns on that travel. So broadly, there's going to be a lot less internal travel going on. Obviously, customer-led travel will still be essential. I do feel a little bit, Andy, that in some ways, we're trading off old relationships. And clearly, we're going to need to renew some of that physically. So yes, I would say, no, not all of it is going to come back in 2021 at all, and it will be carefully reviewed with the budgets this year. Dan, working capital, yes.

Daniel Shook

executive
#60

Yes, working capital, exactly right, Andy. Definitely good performance this year, and I talked about the debtor days coming in. I think we'll hold the days. And with the top line being broadly flat, I'd expect we won't deliver as much cash out of working capital in 2021. But if we hold it, I think that would be quite good in the environment. So yes, no desire to go backwards, may get a little out of inventory as we move through the year, as we said, we've kept the inventories consciously a bit higher to make sure we can manage the volatility of demand and the rapid demand spikes that we're seeing in some of our markets. Aftermarket and opportunity back to you, Roy.

Roy Twite

executive
#61

Yes. Thanks, Dan. Yes. So Andy, Aftermarket, I think, yes, Jackie sees it as a major opportunity. Clearly, his biggest opportunity, and he's investing in really process, I would say, and external agents to make sure that we increase our coverage of the Aftermarket, which he's done very, very effectively and very quickly. Because what that is doing, Andy, is freeing up more upgrade valve opportunities. So -- which is -- grew quickly last year, our upgrade valve business. So definitely -- and as I said, an upgrade valve it's good in itself. Typically, the margins are almost double what they are in new construction. But more importantly than that, you get that lovely parts business annuity afterwards, which is the really crucial thing. So yes, big opportunities still in the aftermarket for sure. Yes, I think fourth quarter, there was a bit of a bounce back. As Dan's explained though, when he was answering an earlier question, the bit that was really down last year in the end was field service. And that is obviously the lower margin bit. That's typically sort of 35% to 40% gross margins, and we do that business. One, it makes money. But two, it also supports customers and really enables us to help them with commissioning and builds a sort of stronger relationship between us and the customer, Andy. And so it's important business. It will be good to get back on the sites, but that's the bit where there's probably the most room for some sort of bounce back.

Andrew Douglas

analyst
#62

And that will be driven by the extent that you can have people traveling around the world? Or is there more to it than that?

Roy Twite

executive
#63

Yes, it's a large part is that. So we did do some of that where customers really needed us. But the field service people will obviously have to sit in a hotel, in some cases for 10 days, 2 weeks. And it's not -- then it's not such profitable business for us, and it's not very much fun for them either, Andy. So yes, it's partly that. It's partly some sites have really restricted access. It's partly budgets as well. Budgets, particularly in downstream, we're under real pressure, right? So I wouldn't say it's all that, but yes, that's contributed, for sure.

Operator

operator
#64

Our next question comes from Mark Davies Jones of Stifel.

Mark Jones

analyst
#65

Can I ask about growth again? Because clearly, you've had very specific margin targets, you're making very impressive progress towards them given the backdrop. Growth, as you say, is the next aspiration. But do you think there might come a time when you have specific top line growth targets alongside your margin targets? Is that a way of focusing attention on that next goal? And I take what you say about acquisitions and discipline around valuation. But given the kinds of areas that you're looking to grow into, might you have to compromise if you're going to shift the mix of the business into areas like pharma, maybe food and beverage where valuations are just higher? And then a related question. Clearly, you've reset the level of dividend consistent with a higher focus on growth and investment into the business over the long term. But it doesn't sound like the incremental organic investment is stepping up. If you can't find the acquisitions at reasonable prices, do you think it's [indiscernible] to revisit that kind of payout in time?

Roy Twite

executive
#66

Right. Okay. So Dan, if -- we'll get to dividends last and I'll let you do that one.

Daniel Shook

executive
#67

Yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#68

In terms of growth targets, I wouldn't rule them out. They -- it's in a big organization, right, 10,000 people, it's best just to make sure that we're focused on the quality of the business right now. I think that over time, the commitment will be that we will grow faster than our markets. And that's the slight issue with a growth target is, you can't sort of defy what's happening swimming with the river, right? And the trick obviously is to get more of the business into the faster flowing river to create the growth, right? So that's an issue with growth targets. I wouldn't rule them out all together, though, but not for the next, let's say, couple of years. Let's just getting the quality of the business, the returns, the volumes, and as you say, the cash flow is starting to come through really strongly. And I'm pleased a few of you talked about that because I was really pleased with our cash flow. Middle of last year, we were worried about some bad debt, and we wanted to keep it tight. And I've got to say the [ DNVs ], Dan and the finance teams did a cracking job of making sure we did keep its size. So we need to keep that size. In terms of -- yes, Dan, do you want to talk a bit about the dividend?

Daniel Shook

executive
#69

Dividend. Yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#70

Yes.

Daniel Shook

executive
#71

I mean you also mentioned about relaxing our standards for M&A. I don't think we'll need to do that. Yes. As we go in and look into some of those areas, they might come at a slightly higher multiple, but of course, they also come with better margins and also better growth prospects. So when you think about our desire to build and make sure we don't dilute our return on invested capital over a 5-year period. If we're buying in the right way, I think we can still hand on heart stay to our targets. But we'll -- that's the point we will stay to that discipline. If we can't deploy the capital either organically or inorganically, I think we will have to revisit how we get that money back to shareholders, I think, and this is coming from a lot of the shareholders who don't like the tax inefficiency of dividends. We'd probably start looking at share buybacks. But at this stage, our focus is to deploy that capital and make sure that we get the right investments into the company.

Roy Twite

executive
#72

Yes. Remember, Mark, last year, capital spend was down, right, we were down to GBP 80 million, right?

Daniel Shook

executive
#73

Yes.

Roy Twite

executive
#74

So -- and that will go back this year to more like our normal GBP 60 million to GBP 70 million. As Dan said in his presentation, there is still a lot of opportunities to invest in the business to improve productivity, efficiency and ultimately, to grow it as well. So that will be our priority.

Operator

operator
#75

Our next question comes from Mark Fielding of RBC.

Mark Fielding

analyst
#76

Just a couple of things. One, on the SG&A side. You touched on this a bit earlier in terms of -- you mentioned, I think one of the questions asked was SG&A. And obviously, we had the question around the temporary savings as well and whether that GBP 8 million, any of it could become more permanent. But I'm just curious for a bit more color on where you think you're getting to on the SG&A savings, particularly in Precision? And I know that will be quite complicated by the fact that 2020 was a very unusual year for these things. But maybe some idea of where SG&A as a percentage of your sales now and where you think is a feasible number for you? Or how you think about that investment? And then a second question, separate line. Obviously, a bit of an update around the ESG side of things today. Just curious, from a product perspective, whether there's any shift in the emphasis of how either your customers are thinking about your products or your marketing those products to your customers in this context and whether -- how much you're seeing that importance of the sort of the ESG questions changing in the end market and the take-up for your products?

Roy Twite

executive
#77

Yes. So on SG&A, yes, and it is a Precision issue, I would say, you're absolutely and Beth's come in and she is looking to, I would say, reduce complexity within that Precision business. And one of those ways is well publicized, we're going to reduce the number of sites. With the addition of Bimba, we're up to 32 sites in Precision, and that's just too many, you've got sites feeding each other with product. And so complex supply chains, big opportunities, still, and that is obviously reflected in the GBP 35 million saving that we put out there pretty much since -- well, since the strategy presentation, 14 months ago, right? So that's one area. The second area is in transactional complexity. And over the last 5 years, something like that, in Critical, as I said, we put in an ERP system. We took time to really design that system for a project-based business with the best people across the division. And then we rolled it out [ 2 ] sites every month. And that was a very resource intensive, very difficult management thing to do. As you know, putting in an ERP and it's tricky, but there's still that opportunity. Precision has only put it into the Americas. And now we've got the whole of Europe, which is obviously half the business, where we've got a huge opportunity to really get the systems right in Precision, cut the amount of time and effort on transactional activities and to, therefore, invest that money into more growth teams, sprint teams to go after faster growth. And that will be the game plan. So the Precision 20% margin target at the top of the cycle still stands. Obviously, as we free up more money, though, we'll be investing more of that into growing that division faster in the future. Now there was another question on ESG as well...

Daniel Shook

executive
#78

ESG, Roy. On how...

Roy Twite

executive
#79

Do you want to take that one Dan? Yes.

Daniel Shook

executive
#80

Yes. In terms of ESG, and we've made really good progress in 2020 to really get our arms around it. Clearly, 3 elements of that. The governance side, we think we've always had that culture and that base. So we're just going to continue to move that forward. Social, as Roy already said, moving on inclusion and diversity, and we're seeing that already all the way from the Board on down, and we'll continue to work through that. On the product side, we think we can do more to actually showcase the things that we bring to market that help our customers reduce their emissions. And I think that's going to be a big focus for us in 2021 to show how our products are reducing emissions and the environmental impact for our customers. At the same time, Roy already said, we'll look at our footprint, and let's face it, part of the reduction of overall sites will give us an opportunity to reduce the overall emissions footprint as we go through that. So I think we've got a really great story to tell there. And perhaps we need to do a bit more of that. And I think that's going to be a lot of the communication going forward.

Roy Twite

executive
#81

Yes. I mean, we built a better world team now which is obviously a global team that are focused on helping us with this. And the motivation and share engagement on people on ESG and IMI is excellent. And people want to be part of sprint teams that are doing good. And what we tend to do now, which is what really well is ask for volunteers. So if we've got a team that's going to work, Bill has got one. Actually, it's in Hydronic, but it's also got a Critical engineer item in district heating. And what we tend to do is ask for volunteers. Obviously, district heating is a great way of storing renewable energy, which is otherwise, as you know, quite tricky to store, right? And so we ask for volunteers, and it's amazing what happens across the divisions now with people coming together, which have got -- who've got experience on district heating or are really interested in that and want to be part of that team. And so the engagement in ESG and in moving our product portfolio that way is, I would say, strong. I would also add to what Dan said that obviously, Hydronic, what it does is to completely align, right, saving energy and building sustainable buildings, completely aligned. What Critical does is obviously safety, safety and productivity and reliability in Critical applications. And so even if it's stopping flare gas happening or if it's improving the efficiency of power stations, which is obviously what they do in the reliability of power stations. And then in Precision, you've got the whole life science area, which is about saving lives. So yes, increasingly, our communications will get that across more strongly. And yes -- and IMI has got a long history of getting on the back of trends like ESG type trends. Even if you can take some Commercial Vehicles within Precision, right, that business was heavily built on the fact that we were reducing the emissions on trucks. And so I think that this is actually a tremendously exciting time for IMI because to take our engineering skills and with countries -- and more than countries, right, the whole of the EU committing to net neutral by 2050. And now China, committing to net neutral by 2060, that will throw up much more investment from customers and governments and much more opportunity for IMI to engineer solutions. So I think this is actually a good time in history for IMI to really grow into.

Mark Fielding

analyst
#82

Just as a quick follow-up on that, which is specific to Hydronic. I mean, obviously, you're guiding for some slight growth in the next year. But it is a division that traditionally maybe has struggled slightly at times on the growth side although undoubtedly in a very high-quality business. When do you think some of these benefits can start to really feed? What's your sort of timeline for thinking that maybe some of these benefits in the market will feed into a higher consistent growth profile in that business as well?

Roy Twite

executive
#83

Yes. I mean, innovation takes time. And the market, the sort of the double edge sword, if you want to call it, in that market is that customers are really sticky. So once you train them in a methodology like hydronic balancing say or why your [ TRV ] is the best in the world and why it doesn't stick and all of those good things, then it's almost generational, right? So they stick with it and they value it. They value the quality, they value the value that you're bringing in terms of solving their problems. So I'm going to be a little bit cautious here because probably more cautious than I'm going to be with, Bill, to be honest with you. But yes, but it does take a time. There is a conservatism in that market. But I would think over the next couple of years, you're going to see a difference in the change in the trajectory of that business.

Operator

operator
#84

Our final question comes from Xing Lu of UBS.

Xingzhou Lu

analyst
#85

Just 2 hopefully quick questions. The first is on pricing. Could you maybe let us know how much you were able to achieve in 2020? And what you anticipate going into 2021? And the general conversations around value pricing? And how is that going in particularly against a tough environment in 2020? And the second question is for Precision, do you have kind of a rough idea of the magnitude of margin difference between the life sciences versus the rest of the division? Just wanted to get a bit of granularity on how we think about the mix shift in 2021?

Roy Twite

executive
#86

Yes. Yes. So pricing, yes, pricing -- despite all the disruption last year, pricing was good. And I think you probably understand that if you take areas like Motion Control pricing's been good, and we don't tend to compete on price. We compete on applications engineering and customer service for a very long time, right? There are [ part ] of our cost options if you just want a very standard products, and you don't want any engineering or service around it. So pricing in motion has been pretty good. The opportunity in Precision is obviously in the long tide of Aftermarket. So once you're not competing on an OEM bid, eventually that machine, that piece of industrial automation goes to the end user and then it becomes aftermarket. And obviously, that products are [ heard ] early on, and actually, that's an older product. And that -- the parts for that are still being sold today. So there's clearly an opportunity there, and that's what we've been doing is making sure that we're pricing appropriately. But in the Aftermarket, where often, we might have to make a very, very special one-off product just to make sure that, that end user is happy, they're getting the right service to get their expensive piece of machinery working, but we're not suffering because we're making a special for actually for below cost. So that initiative continues to go well. I think, again, Beth sees further opportunities. And particularly with the addition of some pretty sophisticated data analytics, I think there's further to go on that side. More broadly, in Critical, as I said before, aftermarket pricing is good because, again, we're in Critical applications. On the new Construction side, it's equally competitive, I would say, it's most competitive in areas like power, where there are very few projects and there are lots of competitors. And it's less competitive in areas like LNG, Marine, where we've got some very sophisticated technology, we're more differentiated. So but Critical, I would say, is probably slightly positive in the Aftermarket and pretty much same as it was 12 months ago in the new Construction side. And then Hydronic, as I said, when we talked about Hydronic, it's got super strong brands. We've educated the customers for decades. We've got an ability to help them design the overall system. So the system cost is less despite the fact that our products are premium products. So that's in a pretty good position, I would say as well in terms of pricing. So yes, pricing, Dan, anything you'd add on pricing?

Daniel Shook

executive
#87

I think the only thing, and you guys all know it, the commodity costs have gone up over the last year. Now you all know we hedge that out 6 to 9 months, depending on how our ability to move pricing. So we're on the front foot on that as well. We've got the time through the hedges, but of course, those hedges roll off. And so for 2021, yes, all the things you say, Roy, around our ability to move those prices and get the right value pricing, will just be -- will be augmented by making sure we just recover those costs as we go through the commodity cycle.

Operator

operator
#88

Yes. Good point, Dan. Excellent. Thank you, Xing Lu, and thank you, everybody, and thank you for joining the call today. My biggest thanks obviously go to the IMI team, who I think really stepped up actually in 2020. And it's goodbye for now. Thank you very much. Bye-bye.

Daniel Shook

executive
#89

Cheers, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete IMI plc transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to IMI plc earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.