ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 15, 2024

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology earnings 25 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Joe Diaz

executive
#1

Thanks, Nick. Good morning, everyone, and welcome. Like Nick mentioned, I'm Joe Diaz with Lytham Partners, the investor relations consulting group representing ImmuCell. I appreciate all of you taking the time to be with us today as we go over the unaudited financial results for the quarter that closed on March 31, 2024. Those listening should be aware and cautioned that anything management says during this call constitutes forward-looking statements, which means any statement referencing future events, anticipated future results, or predictions regarding steps the company intends to take going forward. Such statements aren't guarantees of performance and carry risks and uncertainties that might lead actual results, outcomes, or events to differ materially from what we discuss today. Further details about forward-looking statements and the risks and uncertainties that could affect future results, outcomes, or events can be found in the cautionary note on forward-looking statements or the safe harbor statement included with the press release and the Form 10-K the company filed last night, as well as the company's other periodic filings with the SEC. Everything discussed on this call reflects information only as of today, Wednesday, May 15, 2024. The company assumes no obligation to update any information discussed on this call. Please be aware that references to certain non-GAAP financial measures may come up during today's call. To help you better understand its financial performance, the company has included definitions of these terms, along with reconciliations of these figures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures, in last night's press release. Having said that, I'll now hand the call over to Michael Brigham, President and CEO of ImmuCell Corporation, and afterward we'll open the line for your questions. Michael?

Michael Brigham

executive
#2

Thank you, Joe, and good morning to all of you. What I have to share is a tale of things going quite well alongside some frustration. Regarding Q1, I'd like to discuss 2 financial disclosures that, in our view, illustrate what could be a pivotal moment for the company. To start, product sales rose 111% in the first quarter of 2024 versus the first quarter of 2023; additionally, sales climbed 33% across the trailing 12-month period that closed on March 31, 2024, measured against the trailing 12-month period that closed on March 31, 2023. So once more, 111% quarter-over-quarter, 33% trailing 12 over trailing 12; this gain stems mostly from production output — by executing and refining a multiyear investment aimed at expanding our production capacity, we generated $7.2 million worth of production in the first quarter of 2024, which annualizes to $28.7 million, or roughly 96% of our $30 million full capacity estimate. That production level continues to be our aspirational goal, though we don't anticipate repeating or surpassing it on a consistent basis. The $7.3 million in sales booked during the first quarter of 2024 marks an all-time quarterly sales record for us. Our next best quarter was $6 million, booked in the first quarter of 2022. Second, thanks to those robust sales, we turned earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, of negative $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2023, into positive EBITDA of $377,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2024. Gross margin as a percentage of product sales went from 9% for the quarter ended March 31, '23 to 32% for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, yet that still falls well short of our 45% target. Cash is tight. In response, we've frozen certain capital expenditure investments for now, though we have no draw outstanding on our $1 million line of credit, which remains available to us until September of 2025. That's the big picture. As for the other financial results, the press release offers the complete unaudited P&L results along with some unaudited summary balance sheet data. In addition, our Form 10-Q contains all the unaudited financial details plus management's discussion and analysis. I'll now use our time on this call to walk through all of that in detail. I'd like to add that data has guided us as we remediate the contamination events that have recently plagued us. Improvements made across our production process are enabling us to return to full production. We believe the operational improvements put in place are enabling us to run more effectively at a 100 output level going forward. To succeed, we must steer clear of future significant contamination events and equipment breakdowns and operate with good production yield. So we will stay focused on the commercial opportunity we have with First Defense. Yet, as frequently happens when seeking regulatory clearance, we find ourselves disappointed by still one more hold-up from regulators as we try to launch Retain. Regarding our third vein submission, the FDA just sent us a CMC technical section incomplete letter. Through that incomplete letter, the agency raised a few small inquiries concerning what we filed, meaning a fourth CMC Technical Section submission will be needed, and that type of review normally takes 6 months. Still, the FDA said this resubmission might be able to go through a shorter review window, since the outstanding items aren't complicated. What matters most for timing, though, is that the FDA additionally insists we hold off on resubmitting the CMC Technical Section until the inspectional observations at our drug product contract manufacturer's facilities get resolved. Because the facts and circumstances here are unusual, we're collaborating with the FDA and our drug product contract manufacturer to secure an expedited review; that's simply how this process goes, and we keep pushing ahead. Even so, we stay ready and eager to transform subclinical mastitis treatment in today's dairy market through a novel option区别于 traditional antibiotics, without FDA required milk discard or meat withhold claims. So finally, I'd urge you to check the press release along with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q we submitted last night; I'm also glad for you to look at our corporate presentation slide deck. In my view, it offers quite a solid overview of our business strategy and objectives, plus our present financial results. A May update went up on our website just last night, so visit the Investors section of our site and select corporate presentation, or reach out to us for a copy. Having said that, I'm glad to answer your questions. Operator, please open the lines.

Frank Gasca

analyst
#3

To start, Mike, it's definitely a relief to see sales come in for the quarter. Keep it going.

Michael Brigham

executive
#4

Yeah, I feel the same way. It's really exciting. Thank you.

Frank Gasca

analyst
#5

About the shelf and the offering — can you explain how that works with respect to the market, and how you arrive at setting or permitting a particular amount at any given time?

Michael Brigham

executive
#6

Right, Frank — the ATM's flexibility strikes me as one of its major advantages. So what I'd tell you can shift from one day to the next, one week to the next, one month to the next. The key thing that sets the ATM instrument apart from the traditional — the more traditional offering is that the traditional offering, frankly, would have come out at a big discount to market. With this vehicle, we're able to essentially monitor the market and tweak things as needed — that's the downside. Raising money takes much longer this way, since you're basically taking small bites out of the market. So we examined that quite closely at year-end and as we moved into the first quarter, weighing pros and cons, and more or less concluded this was a fine chance to bring in a modest amount of money without that larger discount we'd expected. Still, I suppose the brief response to what you're asking is that it comes down to management discretion — really Board discretion — on a day-to-day basis.

Frank Gasca

analyst
#7

All right. So certain shares were actually authorized and then sold?

Michael Brigham

executive
#8

That's right. I probably ought to have worked that into what I said earlier, though our disclosures do cover it. Both sets of financial footnotes show it. One footnote deals with the equity section, and another covers the subsequent event. Beyond that, right at the start of the MD&A — so really those 3 spots all restate the identical detail: $300,000 in gross proceeds has been raised.

Frank Gasca

analyst
#9

All right, I noticed that. And regarding whether you reveal — or do you actually, at the point when you're either selling or not selling?

Michael Brigham

executive
#10

So, the Board — the Board, acting through me, relays instructions to the banker and establishes limits for both the quantity and the price. And I believe that via our quarterly — I'm certain that via our quarterly reports, we'd disclose what came out of that engagement and that activity.

Michael Potter

analyst
#11

Well, it was definitely a quarter with a lot going on, both good and bad. Great job on the operations side. But I have to admit, I'm a bit puzzled when it comes to retain. Could you take us through what was found in the inspection? How does this process work, and what's the timeline to move it forward?

Michael Brigham

executive
#12

Yeah. To be honest, it's ongoing, it's happening right now. Nothing has been decided yet. There will be plenty of discussions going on that we won't be involved in. That's happening straight between the FDA and Norbrook. That said, Norbrook keeps us very well informed. We'll receive updates on where things stand, but how they choose to respond is up to them. I'd also mention, this is a large organization. They've got other products, so they have reasons beyond just retain to make sure this gets resolved properly. Once that happens, the FDA will decide how fast they look at it, how quickly they — and what comes out of that review. So it's annoying that we can't give you a clearer answer, but right now we simply don't have one. This is all very recent.

Michael Potter

analyst
#13

All right. So when are we going to get word from the FDA that they aren't proceeding with the approval?

Michael Brigham

executive
#14

Yeah. It came exactly when we thought it would, correct, at the 180-point mark, and that was — well, I believe we had even put out disclosure on this, which is May 10.

Michael Potter

analyst
#15

Today is May 10, so everything is still very new. At this point, we are only beginning to understand how the process will move forward.

Michael Brigham

executive
#16

Right, exactly. It's similar to what I described when I mentioned both the positive side and the irritating side. The positive part is the sales you brought up, and the irritating part is this: wow, we believed we were at the final stage, near the finish line. And we did not receive — we failed to get the full picture. So yes, during the weekend, throughout the weeks that have passed so far, and in the weeks ahead, there will simply be a great deal of communication back and forth, how fast Norbook can reply, how well Norbook can reply, and how soon the FDA can agree.

Maynard Fernandez

analyst
#17

At this point ICC has reached 95% of its maximum production volume, yet the quarter still didn't end in profit. If 95% of production volume doesn't get ICC to profitability, what will? That's my first question. My second one: when do you expect profitability to arrive?

Michael Brigham

executive
#18

Fair enough, Maynard. My best response is that the first place I look is the statement of cash flows, and I go straight to depreciation. While that isn't bottom line profit, on an EBITDA basis you're looking at positive cash flow, and obviously EBITDA isn't a GAAP measure. So that isn't — well, depreciation expenses show up in our GAAP reports, while the EBITDA figure appears only in our press release; so I'd call that step one in the shift away from this product development, retain driven loss toward cash flow and then to P&L after that, but I haven't attached a projected date to it; this really is a transition, and we're viewing '24 in terms of how strong we can keep the sales. how quickly we can reduce some expenses as this retain project that drives almost all of our product development expense as that moves from development to commercial; so a lot of events in '24 to answer that question.

Sean Kirkwood

analyst
#19

So I've got a handful of things I want to ask regarding margins. Based on the 10-Q, it seems like yield might be the reason margins are coming in under the 45% target. Could you give us a bit more color on what's putting pressure on those margins?

Michael Brigham

executive
#20

Sure. Yield is consistently a major factor, and it fluctuates. I mean, it's simply a biological process. We do our best to keep it as controlled as we can, but it does rise and fall. It's just — milk serves as our raw material source, from cows that produce it. I don't want to wander off topic too much, but one marketing stance we take is: don't vaccinate your cows, use First Defense, so you aren't forced to deal with the variability that comes unavoidably with a vaccine — or the commercial vaccine response; so whatever our customers experience on the commercial side, we deal with daily in our production plan; so it does fluctuate. And another element I'd mention is that these contaminations carry a high cost. They did pull the margin down. So going forward, improved yields along with fewer or limited contaminations would definitely lift the margin. That's certainly what we're aiming for. And I believe we also have to acknowledge that this product is hard to manufacture. It's costly to produce. I was reviewing some figures just last night — before Tri-Shield, we were a $10 million company, $10 million in sales. Tri-Shield has truly transformed our top line, with substantial growth and a great deal of customer demand coming to Tri-Shield, but producing it costs more; so I'm not let down, not taken aback by the pressure on the margin once you factor in those 3 factors, but I'd far prefer being a multi-format company with Tri-Shield over a smaller company with only a comparatively cheaper bolus offering.

Sean Kirkwood

analyst
#21

All right. So from what I can tell, it seems like contamination accounted for just about 1% of the margin this quarter, assuming I'm reading that right. That said, how do you go about lifting margins from where they are now up to that 45% target?

Michael Brigham

executive
#22

Right, we intend to press every one of those levers. There are levers at our disposal affecting yield and process control — when we control the process, that removes some of — ideally removes, or at minimum reduces, those contamination difficulties, and then there's volume. The thing is, we carry a lot of fixed costs, and running higher volume across those fixed costs will always benefit us. And sure, this is definitely a priority, though I appreciate the question, and reaching that percentage is a management goal, but I've also got to weigh that against the dollars; percentages don't settle our bills; dollars do, and we need additional gross margin dollars to settle the bills and, going back to what Maynard asked, to return to profitability. What matters is total dollars. And even if that means a somewhat lower margin, that might — in my view that beats being that bolus company sitting at $10 million.

Sean Kirkwood

analyst
#23

All right. These margins are way below what you managed even in your best quarter of 2022, historically speaking. Going forward, do you anticipate any gains? For Q2 and the rest of the year, what ought we to anticipate? Has 33% margin become the new standard?

Michael Brigham

executive
#24

Yes, well, the first step toward improvement, as I said both during the call and in the filings, involves getting away from those disasters, which is 9 232. So the massive priority right now is how fast and how near can we get from 32% to 45%? We constantly discuss the gross margin gap percentage. But another item I examine is, once more, cash, and depreciation forms part of our cost of goods. A margin close to 45% would satisfy me, and that might be 45% once we take out the noncash depreciation. So we're examining that metric, the cash flow metric, plus all those levers to boost that yield; thus it's something oriented toward the future. It will depend on performance and depend on upcoming disclosures, how fast and how near we can get from 32%, 33% to 45%, at minimum 45% prior to depreciation.

Sean Kirkwood

analyst
#25

All right. What I'm asking is whether things have gotten any better since the first quarter, or are we still sitting at 32%?

Michael Brigham

executive
#26

Yeah. Sean, the same response might not be what you want to hear, but it's accurate. The costing side, the production process itself, is genuinely very complicated. Our visibility comes with our auditors on a quarterly basis. There's honestly no weekly or monthly method to precisely gauge that. You can expect and anticipate particular trends, but look, this production process takes 6 months. So the most reliable response is quarterly to quarterly, and interim views aren't disclosed since they simply aren't accurate.

Joe Diaz

analyst
#27

appreciate it, Nick, and I want to thank everyone for being with us on this call; we're eager to speak with you once more when we go over what the second quarter produced, wrapping up on June 30, 2024, and that should happen at some point during the week of August 12. So, we appreciate the time you've given us. Enjoy the rest of your day.

Operator

operator
#28

That brings today's presentation to a close. We appreciate your participation in this session. You're free to leave the call at this time.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete ImmuCell Corporation transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to ImmuCell Corporation earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in ImmuCell Corporation or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.