Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INDV) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 5, 2024

US conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#1

So we'll kick off the session. So good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining this session of the Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference. I am Thibault Boutherin, I'm part of the European pharma equity research team based in London. Before we start, I need to refer to important disclosures. So please see the Morgan Stanley Research Disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. And if you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. So for this session, I am delighted to have with me Mark Crossley, CEO of Indivior, and thank you very much for joining us today. We will shortly do a Q&A. But before that, Mark, would you like to start with some introductory comments on Indivior, the situation and the outlook?

Mark Crossley

executive
#2

Sure. Maybe just a short intro for those not as familiar with Indivior. We're a company that, for over 20 years, has been focused on helping people with substance use disorders, specifically opioid use disorder, where we've had commercial assets and have established buprenorphine medically assisted treatment. The intimacy of that knowledge and engagement and leading in that space led to being the first company to launch a once-monthly, long-acting injectable to treat this in an adherence-based space called SUBLOCADE, which has a paradigm sort of shifting approach to treatment, and is our primary revenue product in the portfolio now as well as some of the heritage products. In addition to SUBLOCADE, we also have a pipeline of other opioid use disorder assets, a potential 3-monthly, long-acting, which is in Phase II, an orexin 1 asset, which would be an oral non-opioid opioid-use disorder medication, so something that patients ask for all the time because they've been in this relationship with opioids and would like to be on a non-opioid medication that's effective. In addition, in the opioid franchise, as we get to the continuum of care, last year, we bought Opiant Pharma and their lead asset OPVEE, which is a now nalmefene-based rescue medication that we think is perfectly suited to help with these highly potent synthetic opioids. Nalmefene is very fast-acting and very strong on the mu receptors, so perfect for these synthetic opioids, where fentanyl is 40 to 100x more potent than morphine and some of the newer variants like nitazenes and things like that, they're 600x more powerful, and that's leading to the roughly 75,000 deaths a year that you see. So a good, robust opioid-use disorder platform. I think as we look towards that and think about what's happened recently, we've been busy since the half year results. We booked our first BARDA order for that OPVEE product, about $8 million in sales. For those not familiar with BARDA, they're the U.S. institution that's responsible for dealing with weaponization of chemicals like synthetic opioids, and they've picked nalmefene as their asset of choice there, which we think is a good signal for the market with regards to the uptick there. We've also been continuing to address legacy legal matters and have settled 2 of those recently through the half year and continue to move forward with a more normal profile for our company. So a very exciting lead up to the time here at Morgan Stanley.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#3

Perfect. So I want to maybe start straight away with one of the big debates around SUBLOCADE today. You mentioned on maybe Q1, Q2, some headwinds coming from the Medicaid disenrollment situation. So if you can provide an update on what you are seeing at the moment on the Medicaid dynamics and how you expect this to impact SUBLOCADE on the remaining of the year.

Mark Crossley

executive
#4

Yes, good question, Thibault, and one we get from investors. And just a reminder to folks and for those less familiar, I mean, this is a headwind that has slowed our growth, but SUBLOCADE is still growing off of a large base of $620 million in Q2 at about 25% year-over-year. So still significant growth, just a bit slower than we expected due to these transitory issues associated with Medicaid renewal. I think the good news is we're starting to work through this headwind. We have about 11 remaining states that are going through this. 8 of those will be done by November. And we have the remaining 3, 2 of which are very small, Alaska, Washington, D.C., which will be 2025. And New York, which is larger that hasn't negotiated with CMS when it will be done. This is incredibly important to our therapy area, different than others because over 70% of our patients, due to the nature of the disease, where they eventually will lose their jobs and need support from the government on Medicaid, rely on that. So we're a little bit more concentrated than your typical therapy area in this space.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#5

No, absolutely. And I was just on the looking at KFF data, which I think you're also following, which is kind of tracking how the Medicaid enrollment is progressing. And it looks like the disenrollment has decelerated because we are going from 24 million of patients disenrolled in April to 25 million in August, which is probably a bit more of a modest increase compared to recent months. So are these data kind of correlating with what you are seeing on the market? And should it -- is this hinting at the kind of end of the headwind already?

Mark Crossley

executive
#6

Yes. And I think that's what we're expecting in the second half of the year. Originally, this phenomenon was supposed to be done at the end of June. CMS had targeted that. But a number of folks had seen so much disruption with the 24 million lives then, 25 million now as of August 23, that Congress had made some increase to CMS to extend some of the remaining states. And so what we'll see is, as those remaining states are done and I think it's North Carolina that ends in November and we had a number in August, we expect those headwinds to ease off through the year and then to those remaining 3 states that I talked about a little earlier. So we would expect those headwinds to ease through the balance of the year.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#7

And once we're fully through that process, is there a potential for this to reverse and actually becoming a tailwind if we start to see actually a number of new enrollments in Medicare kind of outpace disenrollment and then suddenly your kind of eligible population start to grow again? Is it a potential tailwind? Or should we just expect that it normalizes and stay there?

Mark Crossley

executive
#8

I think the hypothesis has been that, that has potential to be there. I think we haven't been seeing that in the market yet that those have been coming back. And it's interesting when you look at how many people have been adjudicated and fallen out of treatment prior to the emergency sort of declaration where they weren't renewing people, there were 72 million people on Medicaid. It went up to 94 million, and now you're down 25 million. So you're almost where you were prior to COVID and the emergency measures that went in place. So you're almost back to a normalized amount. So we're not counting on that becoming a major tailwind.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#9

Right. And so SUBLOCADE launch has been very successful and it's provided a very valuable option for patients and a very different mode of administration. But then recently, you had competition coming in the market with Brixadi. And so investors have been very focused on the competitive dynamic here between you and Brixadi, in particular in the U.S. You indicated on your last communication that -- in July, that SUBLOCADE has around 77% share of patient starts. So has the numbers we have all seen, has it kind of stayed there? Yes.

Mark Crossley

executive
#10

And I think this is -- we spend a lot of time with investors on this. As you would in any therapy area, when you get new entrants, how is the competitive environment going to settle out? When will it settle out and when can we get a feel for what the ongoing dynamic will be? And I think I always like to start with, in this therapy area, there's such a huge unmet need. 9 million patients are abusing opioids, somewhere between 3 million to 5 million have been diagnosed with opioid-use disorder depending on which numbers you use. And at any point in time, there's only 1.2 million in treatment. So you've got about 20% of people in treatment for this. Long-actings are going to play a huge role in helping people get and stay in recovery. And we believe that, that market will establish. And so there's plenty of room for multiple competitors. And we see this in schizophrenia, where there are multiple players in that market, which is approaching $4 billion. And we have more people diagnosed than they do in schizophrenia. So plenty of room for both. With regards to Brixadi, we have tried to highlight because through Medicaid and the disenrollments, this is a high turn, it's about a 6-month length of treatment. So you lose and turn over patients quite quickly, and that was aggravated through the Medicaid renewal, which disproportionately impacted the established player. And so we tried to use that as a highlight of where doctors and patients are making their choice as of the half year. And you're right, it's about 70% -- 7% of new starts based on how we see the data are choosing SUBLOCADE. I think the key here is, as you move forward, how does the market continue to adjust. And the paradigm we believe in so much with SUBLOCADE, where it gets to its therapeutic levels in 4 to 8 hours, which is very unique for a long-acting and maintains them the whole month long. And for me, importantly, 2 different therapeutics, depend on dose, 2 to 3 nanograms per ml, 5 to 7 nanograms per ml, where we're seeing over 45% of our volume, due to the high potent synthetic opioids, we don't see the competitor getting that. So we think long term, SUBLOCADE will disproportionately benefit from that. But the market's settling, the doctors are getting experiences and patient feedback is coming back. So we're in this transition period for 12 to 18 months.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#11

That's clear. You just mentioned the rise of injectables and how it's an option that definitely has a lot of advantages compared to the oral treatments. And one of the debates on the market right now is how high can the share of injectables go? Probably we are -- I think we are around 7% penetration today based on the data we have of buprenorphine treatments being injectables. So how high could we go? Could it be 30%? Could it be more?

Mark Crossley

executive
#12

Yes. And I think that's the piece that the market is going to help us understand. I think when we did our research on this early on, we said it would be about 30% competition, talked about 35% is where doctors saw the patient population. If you look at another area like schizophrenia, they're at about a 20% share of patients that are on long-actings. You look to Europe, and in schizophrenia, they're at 45%. So there's a lot of numbers there. I think the key here is when we give our guidance of greater than $1.5 billion for SUBLOCADE's net revenue, it takes about a 10% patient share to get to $1.5 billion. So if I think of that as a waypoint, the thought of having 10% of buprenorphine medically-assisted treatments on SUBLOCADE seems like a low threshold. And I think part of that market development will also be to share of voice. And obviously, with Brixadi in there, we should see market growth starting to pick up in a more competitive environment.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#13

Can you touch a little bit about the obstacles or the frictions you need to address to reach this 30%, 35% or plus? Is it a problem of patient preference, physician preference? Is it a logistic bottleneck? What frictions do you need to address?

Mark Crossley

executive
#14

Yes. I think one of the things we're fighting against is a very good oral medication. And if you think about what the patients have gone through, typically, they abuse for about 6.5 years on average before they come into treatment. I mean 6.5 years of being in a cycle that starts out chasing a high, but then you become physically addicted and your entire life is consumed in pursuing more opioids. And so the thought of not taking a daily dose as a patient is an incredibly tough item, and it's something that they can't believe would happen. So the film and orals to them are a perfect sort of solution. And so you're fighting against that belief from a patient standpoint and a worry standpoint. The anxiety that they have when they first take a long-acting, that the next day they'll wake up in withdrawals is a major, major barrier for them mentally. And so what we need is we need to get the physicians to have belief in these long-actings, similar to in other spaces, have them talking through the benefits and educating these patients. I think there is a bit now on patient choice and allowing that. But I think as long-actings continue to get more experience, word of mouth and chat rooms and patient awareness through marketing, I think we can start to have patients asking for the medication and continue that growth and that uptick.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#15

That's very clear. I want to touch on one kind of subsegment of the market where we have been very active, which is a criminal justice system. If you can remind us what proportion of SUBLOCADE U.S. sales are in the criminal justice system and how this channel has been performing in the last few months?

Mark Crossley

executive
#16

Yes. This is another nuance of an area -- a therapy area of opioid use disorder that 60% of our patients, because of that life cycle I talked about, 6.5 years abusing, eventually pursuing so much medication that it drives you into a life of crime, 60% of our patients come in contact with the justice system. I mean you don't get that in other therapy areas. And so it makes justice systems a channel to help people start their journey on recovery. And what we've seen is a real mindset change as injectables have become available with jail systems and justice systems that are trying to stop the revolving door of patients coming in, being in the jail system, going out, 75% start reusing within the first 3 months. And the next thing you know, they're in the revolving door and back in the prison system. So we've seen a huge intent to treat in this space. Over the 2 years that we've been actively pursuing this, we have 700 individual institutions that are ordering. It's about 25% of our revenue. And it's an area where we also see the competition starting to focus. And if I think through since our half year update, we've seen kind of an uptick in that pressure from competition. They won a jail system out on the West Coast and then focused a little bit on pricing. So the uptick in the pressure from competition has picked up a bit, too.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#17

Okay. That's clear. And you mentioned a little bit longer sales lead time for new criminal justice system accounts in your last update. Can you just give us an update on this?

Mark Crossley

executive
#18

Sure. So obviously, in our first phase, we focused on the largest jail systems who had a lot of intent on prescribing and trying to stop this revolving door, got those activated. As we've moved on to the more medium-sized and smaller-sized sort of jail systems, what we're finding is as we activate them, and there's a lot of work that has to be done here. One, they have to secure funding. Two, there are state and federal laws. There's REMS to comply with. It's a controlled substance, and it takes months and quarters to activate each of these jail systems from the time they say, "I think this would be good for our patients." And what we saw in organized health systems, the medical centers, when we went from the large to the medium, we didn't see a change in duration in activation on those. It was still about the same time frame. But in the jail systems, where they have less back office in the smaller jails and stuff like that, it's taking longer to activate those. It's a shift, we believe, out rather than an intent. We have high engagement with activation. It's just taking them longer to do all of those administrative things and secure the funding to get there.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#19

I want to come back on the trajectory of growth for SUBLOCADE for the rest of the year. So clearly, you have a guidance for the product. But when we think about the sequence of kind of Q3 versus Q4, should we expect Q3 to still be a bit milder due to maybe a bit -- conditions or headwind you mentioned and then an acceleration in Q4? So kind of how to think about this sequence?

Mark Crossley

executive
#20

Yes. We just gave the guidance a month ago. We don't typically guide on the quarter to it. But I think you're thinking about some of the headwinds and forces there. You have the Medicaid renewal, which will be done by November. A big chunk of it is August, September. You've got competition, which is heating up in some of their pace and intensity of competition in organized health systems in CJS. And then you've got some impacts of seasonality, which typically happen in Q3 and Q4 due to the seasonality of what's going on. You can imagine, I don't know about anyone in the room, but when I'm going to do a diet, I always wait until January 1. And you think about this, a lot of people will put off their entering recovery until that. So there's a bit of seasonality and all of those get offput by -- we increased our sales force that went into the market in February, their efficiency and effectiveness have increased through the years and should offset some of those headwinds in the back half.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#21

Very clear. You mentioned the competition, Brixadi, I mean, has done -- I think the uptake has been quite good for them as well. And I think one of the characteristics of the product that Camurus is insisting on is like some advantages they have over SUBLOCADE. And so can you just tell us a little bit about your work to try to kind of catch up on some of this product advantage, whether it is being able to start the product at home temperature or injection sites or all of these characteristics?

Mark Crossley

executive
#22

Yes. No, it's absolutely right. And it's an area we've been focusing on. I think when you look at the 2 products and you look at the concept of the competition, which is flexibility and a better injection experience with a smaller needle versus SUBLOCADE, which has this very unique paradigm, which we believe is very efficacious and appropriate for synthetic opioids, that does resonate that concept with doctors that elicits trial. Some of the things that resonate are we know the competition talks about the fact that they don't require a cold chain. Well, for our product, it requires a cold chain, but now we've been able to extend the out-of-fridge time to 12 weeks. Very important because the doctor can't keep the product in his office when it's allocated to a patient for more than -- for that duration. So they don't have to, anymore, have it in a fridge. So that stock is in the market on both doses, no longer an issue. Our clinical specialists are able to talk to that. So that's one checkpoint on differences and on features that's there or a potential friction point in less on the fridge, I think, and more on taking it out to warm it up before you inject it. When you move to the other 2, I think there's 2 that we've been working on for some time that we've built into our 401 study from our post-marketing commitment to the FDA on more high-use patients, fentanyl-use patients, and we've been able to build in both alternate sites of injection as well as a rapid induction. So today, on our label, injections occur in the abdomen and they rotate around. We're now able to do back of the -- or we have now have submission in to do back of the arm, buttocks and thigh, similar to the competition. And so that's been submitted. In addition, at the same time, we submitted for a rapid induction of SUBLOCADE, where you would just do one dose of buprenorphine and then be able to inject if as long as they don't have a reaction to that buprenorphine, which is very similar to what the competition has on their weekly, but doesn't have on their monthly. So we'll have a bit of an advantage that we can induct right on a monthly from a usage. Especially, in jail systems which focus a lot on resource utilization, we think that's an advantage to be able to wrap it and induct there. Those were submitted last month ahead of schedule. Our original schedule was kind of the end of Q3. So we'll find out in 60 days with regards to what the review cycle will be. If it's a standard review of 10 months, we should hear back from them in June of next year.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#23

Understood. And you've also done this innovative partnership with Albertsons to try to open alternate sites of care to try to decouple prescriptions from actually administrating the drug. So if you could give us an update on how the partnership is going? And when do you think we're going to see an inflection in SUBLOCADE sales being driven by this collaboration?

Mark Crossley

executive
#24

Sure. And for those less familiar or new to the story, there was a law that enabled buprenorphine medically-assisted called DATA 2000, which had an unintended consequence of creating a barrier for long-actings, where a doctor couldn't prescribe the medication and send the patient to an alternate site to be injected. So for psychiatrists or people that don't want to put hands on patients or don't have the facilities to store it, it became a major barrier for these independent physicians. The good part of that story is as the law changed, Albertsons really saw this as their -- one of their roles in helping with the opioid epidemic, and were ready to do this. They've been also lobbying for the law change to help this. And so we activated Albertsons and have activated for additional partners since Albertsons for a total of 5 for 12,000 injection sites across 22 states. We're still in very early days of uptick there. We've had over 400 patients that have gone through injections. The dispenses grew 50% in Q2 over Q1. So we're seeing good growth off of a small base. I think the key here moving forward is continuing -- we've got a portfolio of additional partners to try and create a very efficient national network so that every doctor that has an independent office can send these patients to get their injections. Now that's going to take quarters and years to do this. The block and tackling of working with these partners to comply with all the rules and make sure they're there and get them there. And then in some cases, there are folks that the stigma is against that and they're reticent because of the stigma of a patient of having them in their stores. And so we have to work through that, connect them with people that are already doing it, that it's not impacting their business. So we're working through that portfolio and looking to expand that network.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#25

Okay. That's clear. And maybe taking a step back and thinking about the opioid epidemic in the U.S. in itself. If you have market intelligence here or you have access to analytics, what are you seeing in the data in terms of the epidemic evolving, number of individuals actually impacted by opioid addiction? So kind of any data helping us understand how this addressable market is evolving.

Mark Crossley

executive
#26

Yes. I think the unfortunate part about this epidemic is it's not easing off. As the market has evolved from different phases, from pain pills to heroin, to fentanyl, to now fentanyl and synthetic opioids and polysubstance use, it has just continued to have 9 million to 10 million people that are abusing opioids, which is a self-reported number. And many people think that number is much larger. We talked about the 3 million to 5 million people diagnosed with OUD and a very low treatment rate. You supplement that with the fact that these opioids have become so strong, you have over 75,000 deaths happening a year due to opioid overdose. That's like a 200-passenger airline going down every day. You combine that with a low treatment rate and this becomes a very bipartisan issue. So when we think with an election, I think we've got record funding. People have been putting laws in place to break down some barriers. And what we hope is that we can continue to partner with whichever administration comes in to continue to break down barriers, increase access and reduce stigma so we can increase treatment across the board. And of course, the long-actings will be a major part of that.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#27

And looking outside of the U.S., I mean, you've -- understandably mostly focused your SUBLOCADE launch in the U.S., but you're starting to have some diversification ex-U.S. If you can share some market share data, maybe to start, in some key regions like Australia, the U.K. Maybe starting here.

Mark Crossley

executive
#28

Yes. And I think you're right, Thibault, the U.S. is the largest value opportunity with regards to the epidemic has disproportionately impacted it. I know there's a lot of shareholders who want to try and compare what's happened in these other countries and will that be the analog for the U.S., I think it's really tough to do that from a couple of different dynamics. I think the first is, the U.S. and Canada have been uniquely impacted by the rise of synthetic opioids. It started with China and then has accelerated with China selling the raw ingredients down to the drug cartels, who've really accelerated that dynamic. That hasn't happened in Europe. It hasn't happened in Australia, and it's -- you're just starting to see the press talk about them hitting the shore over there. So people are just starting to get worried about it. So the treatment arena is quite different when you're trying to do those analogs. And then I think the other one is obviously the health systems and the reimbursement are quite different with the more socialized medicine versus private, and the complexity that's in the U.S. But we are proud of where we've gotten to in it. And then I guess the other one is we were the first mover here in the U.S. based on how we went our -- about our approval process and the competitor was first in most of those ex-U.S. markets. So we were a follower over there. I think the good news is we have a product that's out there, and it's proving out in those markets. It's grown in the second quarter at about 30% to $13 million. We're seeing good success in markets like the Nordics, where we're about a 25% market share. In Canada, where there is no competitor, we're 12% of buprenorphine medically-assisted treatment in Canada, which is really strong progress and penetration there. And then in Australia, which is an analog we hear a lot, it's really -- they've got their health care broken out by kind of geography or state, and it's really a tale of different geographies based on where they are. There's one large geography in New South Wales that has a protocol for Brixadi, and so we're on a secondary impact. And we have a very low share there, just under 5%. In the other markets as a follower, we're somewhere typically between a 30% and just over a 40% share of the market that you'd expect from a second-to-market that's 3 years behind or so. So good progress there, good growth. The value won't be the same for shareholders as what we're seeing in the U.S. market.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#29

Absolutely. Absolutely. So thank you. Thank you very much for these comments on SUBLOCADE. And maybe let's switch a little bit on the litigation side of the equity story. So you recently resolved a large part of -- I mean, some litigation. And in particular, a large part of the U.S. opioid litigation with municipalities, which removed the best-case scenario. And so I think the litigation that investors are focusing on are, first, the dental multi-district litigation; and second, the remaining part of the antitrust litigation. So maybe let's start with the dental one. In this multi-district litigation, you have 673 pending cases, according to plaintiffs' lawyer and you have a potential of 10,000 claims added to this. So if you could just help us understand what are the next key steps for this litigation and what investors should be aware of for the following this topic.

Mark Crossley

executive
#30

Sure. Thanks, Thibault. And listen, we've obviously had some of these legacy litigations from -- allegations from over a decade ago, we've been living with. And our strategy has been to try and resolve these. And you resolve them one of 2 ways. If you can get resolution and certainty at the right value, you settle. Otherwise, you defend them, the allegations, in court. And we've been able to resolve a number of these and bring certainty to shareholders. So as we look to these 2 remaining, which I think you're right, those are the 2 shareholders asked the most about. On the tooth decay issue, I think we're in really early stages on this. It just became an MDL in the fourth quarter last year. We've only had a couple of procedural meetings with the judge. And you're right, the state of play was there were just over 600 cases, and then, ahead of the potential statute of limitations, a bunch of claims were put in. And those have not been screened for compliance with the MDL. And so there's a bunch of procedural things that are going to have to be done with the judge and a potential tolling agreement with the counterparty on how we deal with those things moving forward. But it's multiple, multiple years before you get to a courtroom and, typically, in an MDL. And we'll have to go through a number of procedural items moving forward, where we'll -- once we gain the insights from those, we'll be able to share those with the market.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#31

That's clear. And the second one, the antitrust litigation. So you had a series of settlements on the antitrust issue with the multi-district settled in 2023. And then you had another settlement earlier this year, there's another segment of the antitrust litigation. So what you have remaining is these 2 separate litigation with -- one with Humana, one with Centene, still around this antitrust issue. So if you could help us understand where we are in the process for these and what are the next steps here as well?

Mark Crossley

executive
#32

Yes. And I think this is similar to the tooth decay in that where the other antitrust items had accelerated in discovery and process, these 2 had been filed, but hadn't moved forward, they were watching the other ones. So we're still in early stages. Very little discovery. Still working on procedures. No court dates with regards to these. And so we'll continue to move forward in the same strategy. We look to those folks with regards to if there's a way to resolve them. But we believe we have very meritorious defenses on these as we move forward. So if we had to go to court and defend, we would.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#33

And switching to balance sheet, capital allocation. You recently settled these 2 litigations earlier this year. You announced $100 million share buyback plan. Can you remind us of your net debt position today, if we kind of take into account the provision for the settlements you've already made, your priorities and flexibility in deploying cash in coming quarters?

Mark Crossley

executive
#34

Sure. At the half year, we had roughly $400 million of cash on the balance sheet, with a payment that hadn't gone out yet of $85 million in the settlement. In addition, we've got a number of settlements that are over a couple of year period, that are in the footnotes that would be a use of cash. We have debt of about $238 million. But we are an extremely cash-generative business, $300 million of operating profit over the last 12 months. So very cash generative and very comfortable in our balance sheet and cash generation to fuel the business and meet our financial sort of needs. When it comes to capital allocation, we've made a decision to stop PERSERIS. And we had an Aelis asset, our cannabis use disorder asset, that we haven't talked that we had a Phase IIb study with a partnership out that didn't have separation from its primary and secondary endpoints. So we won't be moving forward with that. So when you think about strategically, we'll narrow down in the short- to medium-term on our OUD franchise, fueling SUBLOCADE, fueling the growth in this transition period of this competitive market as well as focusing on the pipeline on OUD with regards to that. We'll make certain those are fueled properly. And then at the same time, then you have business development and/or returns of capital to shareholders, where we've demonstrated both of those. But I think in the short to medium term, we're going to be focused on the portfolio we have.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#35

Absolutely. And so you just mentioned -- I mean, the decision not to continue with the asset with Aelis Farma. So when we -- in the last minute or so, can you help us, what should we be focusing on in the pipeline or on the next kind of follow-on products beyond the current portfolio? What are you excited about? Or where you do want to go if you can think about business development?

Mark Crossley

executive
#36

I think if I was to think about the pipeline, we've got 2 Phase II assets for opioid-use disorder, potential 3-monthly, long-acting where we're doing dose and duration studies to optimize the product going into Phase III. And then we have our orexin-1, the non-opioid opioid-use disorder medication, which could potentially also be used for polysubstance abuse. Those are both in Phase II. And the orexin-1 just dosed its first patient in June. So that study is starting to ramp up. And you'd expect those to have readout in FDA sort of meetings, probably 2026 based on the study. So those are in the near term, that is -- those are the majority of our portfolio focused right at the core of opioid-use disorder and unmet needs. From a business development standpoint, we always say we're a leader in substance use disorder. If there's an attractive asset that we think could have good commercial potential and scientifically breakthrough, we keep an eye on those. And we monitor about 80 different sort of assets out there and watch them as they head through and pick those at the right opportunity. We could do those at any time, but I'm not expecting anything in the near term.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#37

Okay. That's good. And we are at end of the time. So thank you very much for taking the time and be with us today. We appreciate it.

Mark Crossley

executive
#38

Thank you for the time to you. I really appreciate it.

Thibault Boutherin

analyst
#39

Thank you very much.

Mark Crossley

executive
#40

Appreciate it.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.