International Workplace Group plc (IWG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 7, 2021

London Stock Exchange GB Real Estate Real Estate Management and Development special 51 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Hello, and welcome to the IWG plc conference call. [Operator Instructions] Just to remind you, this conference call is being recorded. Today, I am pleased to present your speakers Mark Dixon, Chief Executive Officer; and Glyn Hughes, Chief Financial Officer. Please begin your meeting.

Mark Dixon

executive
#2

Hello, good morning, everyone. So you've all had a chance, hopefully, to see this morning's update. Really just to put a little bit more color around that. This is a story that regards only the speed of recovery. We've never been in a better position for the medium and longer term with more and more companies switching to hybrid working. But in the shorter term, that is 2021, whilst we're seeing some very strong positive developments in some markets, particularly in the United States and now the beginnings of a recovery in the U.K., we are being affected in a number of other countries by continued lockdowns, extended lockdowns, but overall we're seeing just a continued level of disruption and uncertainty. And it's this uncertainty that slows decision-making. So inquiry levels have recovered in many places to close to or actually exceeding pre-COVID levels. So we don't have an inquiry problem. It is really surrounding decision-making whilst this level of uncertainty persists. So we're taking a more cautious view on the trajectory of improvement this year. And remember, 3 things make a difference: our occupancy rate of improvement, how price moves and how services come back. Now in terms of occupancy in both April, May and June, we saw pretty much a 1% improvement in each of those months, but it wasn't the level we thought it would be, even though it was good, it wasn't as good as we thought it would be. So -- and what you can see when we look at the different rates of improvement, we've got some markets improving at 2% or even 3% per month. And then we've got others that are flat and a very small number that are looking slightly backwards. So in terms of occupancy, the average improvement has been good each month, but just not to the level that we expected. In terms of price, price is following well, but these price improvements were very tightly in line with occupancy. So the better the occupancy improvement, the better the price improvement. But we have, again, seen good progress from the middle of April through May and into June on price. Price is the impact really to revenues that takes the longest to bring back into the order book, but it is improving month-on-month. With services. These -- again, this is probably another significant impact in that the recovery here is slower than expected. So it continues to improve, but just not at the same level that we had expected a few months back. And this is just disruption and uncertainty causing this. Just like to emphasize that we're much more confident on 2022. So we've got everything lined up for a strong recovery into next year. We've got unprecedented continuing wins on enterprise-wide accounts. This has continued through May and into June with more and more companies moving over to hybrid work. And you can see this widely reported in newspapers as well as more and more companies move this way. And we are a net winner as these companies move as we have the most -- the biggest network and we have the best operating platform for companies to move in this direction. This, plus healthy levels of inquiries overall and very strong levels in some markets that have more completely opened up, plus all of that on a lower cost base, means that we're confident given enough time and it really is a timing issue that we're talking to you about today, we're lined up for a good 2022. So we're confident in that number. Very briefly on MFAs. Discussions continue. There were no effects on those discussions and the MFAs we are in discussion on are in markets that are unaffected by what's going on today. And also, we have a healthy level of growth, which seems a little counterintuitive. But there is increasing demand for what we do. Network is what wins the day and we continue to add to it with excellent levels of growth, both in franchise and in management contracts. So low capital requirements or no capital requirements, and we should end this year with a reasonable growth rate compared to the market we're in at the moment. So overall, just to say one more time. This is a timing issue. It's a slower recovery than the trajectory that we'd built in and that we had seen. We're comfortable on 2022 and -- that we expect to see a reasonable level of network growth also coming in, in the second half of the year. With that, I'll close and open up for questions.

Operator

operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Andy Grobler from Crédit Suisse.

Andrew Grobler

analyst
#4

A couple -- just a couple at this stage for me. Given the expected losses this year, what does that mean for the balance sheet and the expectation of M&A from the equity rates and so forth last year? And then, secondly, can you just help us with -- from a cost perspective, what your expectations are for this year just to kind of build a bit of a bridge from last year to 2021, please?

Mark Dixon

executive
#5

Glyn, do you want to deal with that? First part?

Glyn Hughes

executive
#6

Yes. So in terms of -- yes. In terms of balance sheet, Andy, we have adequate funding within the business. We envisage closing 2021 at a net debt level of between GBP 350 million to GBP 400 million, so we have no concerns in that respect. And as occupancy picks up in the business, we get favorable cash inflows from obviously working capital as customers place deposits with us. So all okay there.

Mark Dixon

executive
#7

I think on M&A, I mean, we're doing quite a bit. It's not really M&A in the -- it's sort of very cheap M&A in that we're taking over failing operators. So it has some cost, but these are the costs of gaining synergies and quite a -- we should see, this year, a good uptick in terms of management deals. These are largely management deals where we take over failing competitors, of which there are quite a number. So up until, we're not seeing the right opportunities yet in terms of distress where doing more significant M&A would make sense. But if we saw the right opportunity, Andy, where we could make the right returns with the right risk profile, we have the firepower to do it. So it certainly doesn't -- we're not curtailed in any way. And we're looking forward to the other side. We're not focused on today in terms of where everything is. We know and we can see that having the network, the coverage and the operating system that allows companies to flex and use and offer it to their employees wherever they want to use it is a thing -- is going to be really a major move in the future for many, many companies and we're well placed to benefit from that. And to do that, we're going to need more coverage to convert more of that. So we have this in mind as we're doing it. And we're doing it basically managing this for many property owners who can also see that if they just keep to their old model of leasing space, it's going to be an uphill struggle. And so we've got a significant number of new management contracts just managing space that are not takeovers from building owners who can see that there's a new thing coming. In terms of costs, finally, Andy, look, the -- I'm not quite sure, Glyn, how to answer this, but the -- the costs are -- must be lower, but I haven't -- I may have to come back to you on that.

Glyn Hughes

executive
#8

Yes. Look, high level, Andy. The cost savings guidance that we've given in previous announcements, we're on track to deliver those, both the property-related and the nonproperty-related costs. So that broadly takes us in line with previous communication. I think the one piece to say is there are certain elements of the business that we're going to continue to invest in ahead of the curve particularly around franchising, personnel, et cetera, in certain markets. But the cost guidance that had previously been communicated at the outset of the year is -- still applies.

Andrew Grobler

analyst
#9

And Mark -- thank you for that, Mark. Just coming back to your previous answer around M&A, just trying to bring all that together because when you were issuing convertibles and raising equity last year, you talked about this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to acquire and not -- there hasn't been all that much activity on one side. And two, in terms of capabilities when that does come through, I think cash expectations are now materially lower, hundreds of millions lower than they would have been at the time. Just putting all of that together, do you really -- I mean, do you really have the firepower to go and do a big deal? Or is that now not really on the...

Mark Dixon

executive
#10

Look, A, we really have the firepower; B, there's not enough distress. There is distress, but it's not -- people limp along. So that firepower is there for true distress. And that's -- that -- it's coming out of the woodwork, but it's all small. So you're going to get a growth rate this year. You'll see it as it starts to emerge as these sort of takeovers come in, and you'll see that whilst we have the firepower, we're growing using almost no capital, which is the most attractive type of growth, you would agree. If the right deals come along, we have a lot of liquidity. And remember, the business is improving month-on-month. It's not a -- this is -- we're not updating today to say the business is going backwards. We're updating to say the business isn't moving forward at the same trajectory as we had expected, that's it, but it's definitely moving forward. So with moving forward, as Glyn said, rising occupancy, rising price gives you more cash flow and more positive -- more negative working capital coming in.

Operator

operator
#11

The next question is from [ Sami Manimi ] from [indiscernible]. The next question is from [ Edward Donoghue ] from One Investments.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#12

A couple from my side. Just going back to the area -- to the geographies where everything is looking more robust and tracking back to as planned, to get an idea on the service take-up and the pricing that you're seeing there versus pre-COVID, just to give an idea of sort of benchmarking when you say things were actually on track. Just give us an idea of what's actually going on in those regions, it would be helpful to start with.

Mark Dixon

executive
#13

I think, look, to deal with price, what I've said previously and I reiterate today, and Glyn will back up, is that it takes about a year for the business to recover and that's largely down to price. So occupancy is first indicator, services, then price. It takes with price it takes -- price takes a long time to go down. It's taken a year to reduce and it will take a year to recover. Now what we've seen in the past months, if we look at the month of May and the second half of April is strong price recovery and we're talking around about 8%, 9%. But that 8%, 9% is in new sales that were done in that month. And so however many sales you're doing in the month, it then takes time for that to -- you have to do that every month for a year to get a 9% price increase. Now just to be clear, it's not a price increase. This is just reducing discounting. So you're getting back to your target price. But we're making good progress on this where we have improvements in occupancy. And the two, as I said in my comments earlier, very closely linked. So that's an average increase on price. That's where we've got slow and fast trajectory. If we get -- if we move faster on occupancy, we move faster on price. We don't need to offer as much discount.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#14

If you go to those areas where you've got the better trajectory, is that tracking the correlation between occupancy, pricing and service acknowledging the lagging effect on those as you were planning? And if you go back to previous cycles, I mean I know this one is very, very different because of the circumstances, but are you seeing a similar behavior pattern?

Mark Dixon

executive
#15

Well, look, we've -- you can't go back to any previous cycles, except for SARS, where -- and the SARS effect was minor compared to the effects of this pandemic. But we're seeing exactly as I'm saying here, where you get the -- the shining example here is the United States, where you've got pretty much the whole of the U.S. improving, but the states that exited first will be right at the top end of improvement month-on-month and the states exiting second, third will be slower, but everything is improving. And with that, less discounts, so better price and services coming back. The U.S. is less affected by seasonality in the summer. Americans take less holidays and it's not like Europe closing down so on. And the -- again, one of the reasons for our caution is that we know that in parts of Europe, companies will delay making decisions until after the summer. And so we're taking a cautious view now just to manage expectations going through the rest of this year. But it's evidenced everywhere. We can see this in many, many markets, the just different rates of recovery. And they are all similar in terms of how they come out. We've got quite a uniform business in that way.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#16

Okay. And then 2 other questions, if you don't mind. Just as the recoveries is gathering momentum broadly. What are you seeing with regard to landlord behavior and the dialogue from that side? And then the other one with the last question would be just on your dedicated city center urban sites, what again is the behavior patterns and the take-up and returns that you're seeing there versus some of the original planning?

Mark Dixon

executive
#17

Well, look, the biggest change is in the sort of downtown areas because as people start to come back into them, they were the worst affected. So clearly, they will improve, relatively speaking, the most. The -- and we're seeing that improvement. I mean -- but it is a question of, I think it's also related to commuting and the people -- where the commute is the longest, those are the slowest to recover. So -- but we're seeing improvements. I mean, in places that were very, very difficult, such as New York, we're seeing quite strong improvements in New York. And you have to just look at the reasons why during the whole of COVID we continued to sell in New York and London and so on. We didn't stop selling. We were selling to a new type of customer and these were customers that were companies that had a break in their lease and were downsizing, and I've pointed this out over the past year. And so these were companies saying, we just don't need to be -- have so much space in the city, we'll get smaller space and sort of take space on a flex basis where and when we need it. That is continuing. And we get -- there is a definite trend for more and more companies to adopt a much more flexible approach to their space and have more people working, either from home or from close to home and have smaller sort of central offices. And we win on that, and we can see that happening in the city markets, where you get more and more companies that are looking for smaller space and more flexibility. So I think from a trend point of view -- and we're adding more centers in these city centers, just to be clear, which brings me on to the second point on landlords. Landlords, even though you will hear from brokers -- all the real estate brokers will say they're the busiest they've ever been, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, it's partly true and that's just -- but it's because you've got a year's pent-up activity all happening at once. But the reality is these are companies getting out of leases and taking smaller space in the main. Some companies, obviously, are not, but many, many are downsizing in the cities. So this is giving forward-looking landlords understand there's a problem coming and are talking to us and we are opening centers with them to provide the space that future companies want, which is managed, it's flexible, it allows smaller space, has great central amenities. That's what companies are going to be looking for more and more in the future is what we do. And so a good -- more than we've done in any other year coming through now in terms of us working with landlords to create that space. And -- but overall, in spite of whatever you may read, there is going to be a definite change in office occupation. It's certainly not going back to where it was. And it's -- but this bodes very well for us. Again, as I mentioned in my comments, more significant wins, we'll update on the half year results, more significant wins from enterprise-wide customers where you can see them changing. And all research points in this direction. Our wins point in this direction of the way companies use space is -- has changed and will not change back in our opinion.

Operator

operator
#18

The next question is from Steve Woolf from Numis Securities.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#19

Just a few from me. In terms of the rate of recovery, you've flagged that Europe is definitely a laggard in that U.S. is better. So it sounds like Asia is also lagging, but of course, part of that has been better in terms of the rate of recovery. Just generally, I appreciate Japan is possibly an exception to that. So I was wondering if you could give a bit more detail on Asia. Secondly, if cost savings are on track, I just wondered could you remind me of the impact of the annualization of those cost savings in 2021. And then in -- well, 2 more as follow-ups. The renewals wave, you mentioned that new deals are going through at a better rate than the floor of about 8% to 9%. Is that also holding true for renewals that you're going through? And then, finally, just a question regarding that level of net debt at sort of GBP 300 million to GBP 400 million. Could you just remind us -- or remind me, rather, on the covenants you've got against some of that debt as well, please?

Mark Dixon

executive
#20

Okay. Dealing on the first, renewals have reached pre-COVID levels. So that's -- I mean, this is a very strong underlying sign. And that's one of the reasons that occupancy is picking up, it's not just sales. It's that less people are moving out. So that's a strong indicator. Then if I turn to the next question, I think you had, which is price. That price is not the renewal price. That is the new sales improvement in price that I was talking about with renewal.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#21

The renewal part -- the renewal offer going through at what you were saying at the pre-COVID price? Okay.

Mark Dixon

executive
#22

Yes. Then the overall price improvement you're looking at about 8%, 9% on average, but this is just sort of 1, 1.5 months data. But that, again, is a strong sign. And that's reduction in discounts, not an increase of price. In terms of the -- Glyn, the annualizing, not quite sure about the question, but leave to you, Glyn.

Glyn Hughes

executive
#23

Yes, that's fine. So I think, high level, the previous messaging we've given on anticipated cost savings still hold for 2021 because some of these cost savings were delivered in 2020. For 2021, we've got savings, some closures, which are kind of property and nonproperty of about GBP 130 million. And then we've got an extra GBP 50 million to GBP 60 million in-year savings from procurement, people and other rent deals that we anticipate coming to the fore. So you're looking for that in-year 2021 of around just under GBP 200 million.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#24

Okay. Perfect. And then the covenants, also I appreciate that you've got the convertible in there, as well as just general covenants.

Glyn Hughes

executive
#25

Sorry, Steve, I missed that.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#26

Sorry, the -- on the net debt position and the covenants again, I appreciate you've got the convertible in there, obviously, as well.

Glyn Hughes

executive
#27

Yes. So the net debt full year -- closing 2021, we're anticipating net debt in the GBP 350 million to GBP 400 million range. We've also taken the opportunity to revise the covenants with our banking partners over the last few months as well to give us more operational flexibility. So we have no concerns in that respect.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#28

Okay. And the covenants themselves, you're prepared to disclose what they are, 2%, 2.5% at times?

Glyn Hughes

executive
#29

Those -- well, firstly, those are commercially sensitive. And secondly, they are, let's say, more flexible than they have been in the past, bearing in mind the recovery phase that we're in. So we're not in a position to disclose the actual targets.

Steve Woolf

analyst
#30

Okay. No problem. And then just one follow-up. In terms of that recovery, I think some of your competitors have perhaps been a little more positive regarding the pace of recovery. Yes, have you found that...

Mark Dixon

executive
#31

Steve, which one?

Steve Woolf

analyst
#32

A very noisy competitor, shall we say, and obviously, there was comments from Workspace yesterday in terms of London, albeit it was London specifically.

Mark Dixon

executive
#33

Well, I think, look, if you look at Workspace, Graham is talking about a recovery over the next couple of years. It takes time. We're saying it is going to take about 12 months. Graham Clemett saying more like 24 months. And we've got a -- we're much more dynamically set than a company like Workspace, and we have a lot more diversity. And we've got enterprise accounts and so on, which are giving new layers of income that a company like Workspace don't have. If we look at WeWork -- look, the acid test will be the actual numbers. I mean, yes, they're talking positive, but the actual numbers all went completely negative. And if they will be benefiting from a U.S. recovery, just like we are, but they are so far underwater, that it's hard to see how they -- the sort of level of improvement they're talking about. If they're able to achieve it, we, as a company, would be very happy because it will mean we will achieve it as well and there would have been no need from this update today. But it's -- we're in this for the long term. We want to make sure that we are not having expectations that we feel would be difficult to achieve and so on. So -- but the acid test will be the numbers, Steve, and it's going to take a miracle to -- for them to achieve theirs, I think.

Operator

operator
#34

The next question is from Daniel Cowan from HSBC.

Daniel Thomas Cowan

analyst
#35

Dan Cowan here from HSBC. I've got 2 questions. One is, can you give us an idea -- I don't know actually if you've got enough data on this, but what's the take-up been of the enterprise deals that you've signed so far? Have you got any idea of the rate at which they're being used so far? I appreciate that's take time to onboard these big accounts. But have you got any sense of the...

Mark Dixon

executive
#36

Yes. Look, I mean what we are sort of modeling is -- and again, it's only what I've said previously is that our short-term occupancy, that's use of drop-in day office products will move next year to -- from 1% to 5%, maybe it will be more. And just to give a backdrop on this from our friends at WeWork, they're claiming that they're going to have 10% of their revenue coming from drop-in. But they're not signing up any enterprise accounts, they're all individuals. So we are seeing the take-up improves sort of month-on-month, week-on-week, more people onboard, more people tried and more people come in, the company gets more used to using it. So the 2 impacts will be day office and meeting rooms. We will be spending a little money to upgrade our meeting rooms in some places this year because we're seeing more meeting room usage from these companies as well, as you would expect. As they reduce their own space, they need to use someone else's space then. So we're comfortable in this. And as I said, we've signed up more. My underlying concern remains is do we have enough space in the right places? That's my underlying concern has not gone away.

Daniel Thomas Cowan

analyst
#37

Got you. And just the second question is actually on occupancy. I mean I think Q1, you were talking about 66% occupancy for mature centers. Can you give us an idea roughly will you see that for the full year and maybe into next year? I appreciate it's a bit of a moving target, but given the sort of confidence in '22 still being pretty firm, can you give us perhaps your thoughts on where capacity might end up?

Mark Dixon

executive
#38

Glyn?

Glyn Hughes

executive
#39

Yes. So yes, thanks, Dan. So at a very high level, as Mark indicated, we're anticipating a continued pickup month-on-month in occupancy. And we'd hope that a total -- kind of at the global level, our occupancy levels are in the low to mid-70s at the end of 2021; with the mature estate, a couple of percentage points higher than that. From that starting point, we're then working on the premise that occupancy would steadily improve throughout 2022, and particularly in the second half, as Mark alluded to. So 12 months from now, the business should be at, I would say, a steady-state and more representative of what the future holds. And that would get us in 2022 at an occupancy level slightly ahead of where we were pre-COVID, in the high 70s, low 80%, yes.

Mark Dixon

executive
#40

And then if you add to that Glyn's words, then you add...

Glyn Hughes

executive
#41

The enterprise piece.

Mark Dixon

executive
#42

Put a conservative 3% of additional occupancy because our occupancy does not -- don't confuse our occupancy with the WeWork occupancy, where they're dividing the number of members by the number of seats. We don't do that because it's not occupancy. What -- our occupancy that we're giving you and that Glyn was speaking about is long-term occupancy. In addition, we have short-term drop-in occupancy. And that, again, if it became 4%, just if you took it on a 3% average in that '22 year, that probably, Glyn, would be reasonable for people to do?

Glyn Hughes

executive
#43

That's what we've kind of embedded in our forecast, yes. So the -- would be at the low 80% occupancy plus an overlay for the enterprise deals that Mark mentioned.

Mark Dixon

executive
#44

Yes. Then if services are badly hit, again, you can just compare them to -- it's quite easy to do to compare where they were with -- and it's them coming back on the size of the estate then, you can -- it's quite easy to see that coming back. And then price. The price has taken an impact. But that building back has the biggest effect with, what I think we'll be talking about next year, which will be inflation. We're very well set with what we've done so far on cost to -- we can -- we've got good cover, I think, in what I think is going to be an inflationary market in '22 on average.

Operator

operator
#45

The next question is from James Zaremba from Barclays.

James Zaremba

analyst
#46

One follow-up just on services. Can you discuss what level of incremental improvement is anticipated here to meet your kind of '22 expectations and how that level kind of compares to the pre-COVID levels? Then one on occupancy. Just in terms of being slightly below -- behind the trend you're expecting? Is this significantly higher churn than expected? Or was it lower new sale rates than expected? And I guess where does that churn at the moment compared to pre-COVID levels? And then just one to Glyn on the kind of cost base and your comments about SG&A investments going to support the franchise strategy. Kind of conversely, can you talk about how much SG&A gain there's been from, I suppose, doing lower conventional lease openings this year and I suppose going forward.

Mark Dixon

executive
#47

Sorry. What's that last question? I missed that one, sorry.

James Zaremba

analyst
#48

The last one was just about within SG&A, I guess there's been some costs here historically to support conventional lease openings, which are obviously reducing so...

Mark Dixon

executive
#49

I think just to deal with that in order and then I'll pass that over to you, Glyn. But I think, Glyn, you've already answered that third one. Churn is at pre-COVID level. So we're back up to the retention rate or the churn rate pre-COVID, which is a very strong sign. And we've been there for the last 2 months, at least. So that's -- so the occupancy gains are coming from -- your churn rate is at a lower level and new sales are at a stronger level, pure and simple. And we've seen sales overall, and I'm taking this off the top of the head, but close to or even ahead of pre-COVID levels in places like the U.S. So -- and it's patchy overall globally, but the U.S. overall improving. U.K. improving in the recent -- in the last month. And even places some -- Germany improved. So it's very -- it is -- everything is primed for improvement. On average, everything is improving in general. It's just the rate of that improvement we need basically more sales and to hold the -- keep the retention level up and the retention level looks very healthy. So that's -- we're not concerned on that. It's just getting more decisions. We have the inquiry rates, it's just getting more conversion. In the SG&A question, Glyn, I think you answered it on franchise. We continue to invest, but do you want to deal with...

Glyn Hughes

executive
#50

Yes. Continuing to invest. I think, high level, we're -- I would say, taking decisive action to reduce the level of overhead expenditure within the business, both people and nonpeople. Our capital expenditure plans for this year, I think, are more aligned with a lower-risk, lower-capital intensity growth plan going forward. Obviously, that will, over time, feed through into lower depreciation rates. But the impact on 2021 numbers in terms of that latter element is relatively low because that takes a while to feed through the system. But we're making, I would say, good progress in terms of keeping overheads at a level which is relevant for the future business.

Mark Dixon

executive
#51

I think, finally, you mentioned services and services recovery. One of the areas, apart from growth that we've continued to invest in, in fact, we've increased the investment, has been in the tech platform and has been in services. So this is business development teams that are developing services for the future. We've launched new services. We're anticipating what these larger hybrid accounts want and we've got people developing solutions for them. We've also acquired a few small, but very attractive services businesses, which we have synergized. We've now invested in to grow. So we see the services side as being a potential upside for '22, but definitely an upside for the future beyond that. So we're taking again -- we're comfortable with '22 because we had cushion in there anyway, but there are upsides. If these services initiatives start to deliver, in addition to everything else, that will help.

Operator

operator
#52

The next question is from Sam Dindol from Stifel.

Samuel Dindol

analyst
#53

A couple of questions from me. Firstly, on the trading recovery, it sounds like sort of [ 2022 ] expectations are not going to change too much. Just wondering when you expect to get to sort of EBIT breakeven. Is that going to be fairly or later in the second half? Or any sort of color around that? And then second, on the MFAs, obviously, you made comments on some discussions in the final stages. Is it fair to assume those are possibly North American-based given commentary on sort of trading trends, et cetera? And would we expect an outlook for interims? Or is that more like to be in August?

Mark Dixon

executive
#54

You want to go first, Glyn.

Glyn Hughes

executive
#55

Yes. Sorry, yes. I was going to say in relation to operating performance so at an EBITDA level, we are making, I would say, small positive EBITDA month-on-month as we speak. In terms of that translating into operating profit becoming positive, at the back end of '21, early '22 we'll be in positive territory at an operating profit level post overheads. Yes.

Mark Dixon

executive
#56

Yes. MFAs, we're going -- we would expect announcements this year and the earlier part of the year. But again, this is -- these will take the time that they take. Number of discussions ongoing as before, and we'll update as soon as we have something to say.

Operator

operator
#57

The next question is from [ Edward Donoghue ] from One Investments.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#58

Sorry, gentlemen, you just got me back. It's just one quick one. I just want to get a clear understanding of the EBITDA we're referencing for full year '20. That's my starting point. That's the first and then we can just follow on question from that.

Mark Dixon

executive
#59

Glyn?

Glyn Hughes

executive
#60

Yes. So we've referenced in the announcement that we will be below the 2020 number and that was GBP 134 million of recurring EBITDA. We're anticipating that 2021 will be below that number, somewhere in the region of GBP 50 million to GBP 100 million.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#61

Okay. Now I acknowledge I don't run your business, but do invest in it. I'm slightly confused as to the calls that were progressing through last year, the early part of this in terms of the figure we got today. Looking at the cost-saving program, looking at the, I call it, the hopper of commercial discussions you're having and how that was actually being converted to sales, your conversation and points with regard to reduced churn, various key regions back to or slightly better than pre, just bringing all that together, I'd have difficulty to understand why this year would be, leave aside the number that the market had, what I don't quite get is why it would be significantly below that of '21?

Mark Dixon

executive
#62

You've just got more bad months in the year. It's basic mathematics. You had the best first quarter we've ever had at the beginning of '20. And then you have, from that high point, you have mathematically 9 months of decline, okay? So 3 high months and 9 declining months. Then if we look at '21, we went down from -- continued to decline into the first quarter, okay, and even into April because the following effects of price. So your -- the bottom of the curve is sort of April time. You start moving up in May and onwards. And you just have -- you have less months to recover, that's all. So the -- it's simple mathematics. Now it can change if occupancy -- you can do the arithmetic yourself, if occupancy, which is improving at 1% each month, recovers at 2% each month, you have a better outcome. You have obviously the effects of occupancy and price and the services come back more quickly. But it's just the number of good months you have in a difficult year. And it's that...

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#63

Okay. I'm sorry. Mark, I apologize, but I acknowledge that. But I'm also remembering that there was a significant effort put by yourselves as a management team into reducing the cost base as well. And yes, a lot of dynamic handling. And I'm trying to -- I just have difficulty seeing where everything is sort of missing aligned. Okay, maybe I've got to go back and look at my spreadsheet.

Mark Dixon

executive
#64

Well, we need to take you through it because it's -- basically, the costs are reduced, okay. The -- essentially, we're missing half of our service revenue, which is painful. We -- our occupancy levels are off and price is up. I mean it's those it's -- that is what -- and we've reduced the cost, thankfully, and continue to do so. The -- there's no getting away from the arithmetic. I mean it's, unfortunately...

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#65

I get that. All right.

Mark Dixon

executive
#66

Yes. But we'll take you through it. I mean it's a tough one, but it is what it is. Again, it's just -- and it's our job now to try and improve the trajectory of recovery. And that's the upside for this year is possible. Our focus is on '22. The better we can get the trajectory this year, the better the exit to this year, the better next year will be.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#67

Do you see a need on what you're tracking so far to actually look harder at the cost base than the original planning would have been? Or is there actually that flexibility?

Mark Dixon

executive
#68

We're looking at it all the time. Don't worry. This is -- we are -- we're not sort of ignoring cost at all. In fact, the opposite. Part of our problem here running the business is it's easy to focus on fixed costs, go back, and we are going back and redoing leases even today, we're not hesitating. Where we think we've got an unviable unit, we'll go back and work that one over again. The challenge when running a business in a -- it's hard to see it, obviously, with today's update, but we're in a super exciting place with the world of workplace coming in our direction. The challenge is investing in the right things for the future business and that is in the business development required for the platform, for the services and so on. We're doing it in a small way, in a cautious way. But that's the challenging part. The easy part is to close nonperforming units or renegotiate them, that's easy. The difficulty is actually investing for the future in a time like today. But we are doing it, but moderately.

Operator

operator
#69

There are no further questions, so I'll hand back to Mark for closing comments.

Mark Dixon

executive
#70

Okay. Right. Thank you all very much, and thank you as always for the questions and for joining us in short notice this morning. Rest assured, we'll be back to any investors today that want to get any further information or color. We thank you for your patience this morning. Thanks. Bye-bye.

Operator

operator
#71

Thank you. This now concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete International Workplace Group plc transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to International Workplace Group plc earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.