InvenTrust Properties Corp. (IVT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 15, 2026

NYSE US Real Estate Retail REITs conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Samir Khanal

analyst
#1

Well, thank you, everybody. On to the next panel, we got InvenTrust here with us. Happy to have DJ Busch with us, who is the CEO of the company. Why don't you introduce your team? -- you have some opening remarks to start off.

Daniel Busch

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks so much, Samir. Thank you, guys, for having us, Andrew. With me today is Christy David, our Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel; and Dave Heimberger, our Chief Investment Officer. I think most of the faces here certainly look familiar. Thanks for joining us and your interest. Just a quick background, InvenTrust Properties, 78 properties, open-air, essential retail, exclusively in Sun Belt markets. So 2/3 of our portfolio is, kind of, core neighborhood grocery-anchored centers, the balance being power centers. But the sole focus and mandate for our company is to own and operate essential retail, open-air centers in markets that we feel that are exhibiting better growth characteristics than what you see in the balance of the country, in which case -- and that shows up through our ability to push rents and grow cash flow faster than some of the other -- most -- certainly, our goal is to grow it faster than the sector average or what else is available in the public market. We've been a public company for almost 5 years. It will be 5 years on October 13 (sic) [October 12]. Over that 5-year period, we've grown NOI by over 20%, FFO per share by over 25%, grown the asset base by over $0.5 billion with the expectation that we can continue to do that for the foreseeable future. We have plenty of capacity on our balance sheet to continue to grow our business without having to access the equity capital markets and continue to grow and accelerate free cash flow, both through internal prospects and our external growth prospects. Obviously, in the current market, it's become a little bit more challenging for 2 reasons. First one, obviously, being retail is back in vogue from a private market perspective. It has been a much more competitive environment, especially in the markets where we're looking to acquire and expand our business and our presence. But equally as important, our cost of capital has obviously changed over the past several quarters with rising debt costs impacting our incremental -- our ability to get incremental debt at a level that's attractive compared to the use of proceeds. So we're monitoring that. We've been very fortunate this year. We've closed on to date, including the one we closed subsequent to the quarter, $290 million of acquisitions in current and new markets. So this year, we've closed a couple of deals in Charlotte, our deal in Nashville, our first deal in Knoxville, Tennessee, as well. And then subsequent to the quarter, we did close a grocery-anchored center in Greensboro, North Carolina. So core markets and then finding really exciting opportunities in some of these complementary emerging Sun Belt markets that exhibit the same characteristics that we do see in some of our core markets like in Austin or Charlotte or West Florida or the like. But I'll start there and then go in any direction you want, Samir.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#3

Yes. Maybe just on macro. You talked about the Sun Belt, kind of, where you've been focused, clearly, a big beneficiary of the migration that we saw over the last several years. Are you seeing any, sort of, changes in, sort of, household formation there? -- population growth that, kind of, maybe going the other way now?

Daniel Busch

executive
#4

No. So what we have seen is we've seen the migration trends continue, especially in the Carolinas, in Florida and in our markets in Texas. We've seen that continue. What has changed is the cost of living in some of our core markets has gotten harder, meaning home prices have certainly increased, other pricing has increased, which has availed new opportunities in some of those secondary emerging markets where, obviously, Nashville has become over the last 15 years has completely transformed. We see similar characteristics, certainly not to the same extent, but similar characteristics in Knoxville, which is -- continues to be a lower cost of living, but has some great growth drivers as well. So same thing in Greensboro versus what we're seeing in Charlotte or Asheville. So using those, kind of, that hub-and-spoke strategy to support it. Now what I will say is the most -- the great thing about our business is and specifically retail is the lack of new supply. So even in the markets that -- where the cost of living and rent prices and home values have gone up, new supply has actually alleviated some of that, specifically in the Sun Belt. So if you think about this, if this was multifamily, and I was -- we had a Sun Belt strategy, I'd be a little bit more worried because there's been a lot of new supply that's put -- that's tempered or even reduced our rental rates. That's great for our business. It makes our -- it gives our customer an ability -- more wallet share to come to our centers. And our centers certainly are still not having -- are not impacted by any new supply. So a relief in home prices and rental rates at multifamily is helpful for our retail centers.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#5

And then when you talk about new supply, I mean, which are the markets again? I mean it's...

Daniel Busch

executive
#6

So new supply, I was talking about new housing.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#7

New housing...

Daniel Busch

executive
#8

Supports retail. From a retail perspective, we're still not seeing any new...

Samir Khanal

analyst
#9

Maybe in Texas or Houston, right, [indiscernible].

Daniel Busch

executive
#10

Yes. Exactly.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#11

Okay. And let's talk about the leasing pipeline today, maybe compare that to this time last year. what's changed as you think about the depth in demand, the quality of prospects?

Daniel Busch

executive
#12

Yes. Well, Christy, do you want to touch on that?

Christy David

executive
#13

I think that our leasing pipeline is still very healthy. We have signed our signed but not open pipeline, which is about $5.6 million. We have another 170 basis points of deals sitting in our leasing pipeline. And that means that they're either at lease or LOI or in the legal stages so that they're in the fruition, but they haven't made it to the signed stage. And the quality is exactly what you'd expect of, kind of, what we've been doing, Samir. It's a good mix of either fitness. We're still seeing service-oriented. We're seeing food uses and the like. And so I think it's a continuation of what we've been producing, and you've seen us sign and open in our centers. And I think that, that pipeline continues to just be robust. And we're actually -- compared to where we were at last year, we were at about 110 basis points this time last year. So seeing a little bit of increase there.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#14

One of the things we had an economics panel this morning and our economist was talking about, obviously, higher gas prices and what that could mean for, sort of, consumer discretionary, right, spending. And I know you've talked about your restaurant exposure. I want to say it's close to 20%, right? I think -- I mean, what are you seeing on that end? And as we think about restaurant credit and, sort of, expansion plans?

Daniel Busch

executive
#15

Yes, it's a good question. So I would say restaurants tend -- it's a fickle business. It's a tough business. It's certainly harder to succeed than fail, it seems like. But it's an important merchandise mix for us. Especially if you think about the structural change in our centers and the traffic patterns that we have post COVID and the adoption, certainly in some of our markets, the much more widespread adoption of hybrid work environments. There's just more frequency, more daytime frequency at our centers, which lends itself well to services and specifically food uses. So I think we're right around 20%, just over 20% today. That's a great, kind of, a -- that's a great mix for us. A great additional complementary has been like health services, which has just surpassed, I think, 10%, maybe close to 12% of our merchandise mix. Those uses would have probably been a lot lower pre-pandemic as they should have been because you're not getting the same frequency that we're getting today in our suburban shopping centers. So I think we'll continue to curate our food uses. Credit is supremely important. Even if they don't succeed, you need to make sure that you're protected. But the reality is the trends in foodservice move quickly. And we just -- it's an important part of our merchandise mix, but it also -- it probably has one of the higher levels of risk from a category perspective. The good news is every restauranteur we lose, we get a more optimistic restaurant tour to come in.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#16

This isn't mine either.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#17

Quick question, DJ. 20% restaurant-related one that -- how do you think about and manage the CapEx spend that goes with that? Because a lot of -- historically, if you have a bad restaurant, you pump a lot of money into.

Daniel Busch

executive
#18

Great question. So what is the average restaurant survival? The average restaurant survives how many years, 3 or 4 years? We do 10-year leases, right? Luckily, most of our centers are of high quality. Most of -- our level of success is obviously certainly higher than that. But it does come with -- it's one of our most capital-intensive tenants. So the credit backing is supremely important. Make sure that they're putting in enough capital and they're committing to the site just as much as the landlord is, if not more. And depending on what their credit looks like, Christy and her team will be asking for different things from that tenant. The good news is once you do have a real good restaurant build-out, you can tend to use that over and over again if it's in reasonably good shape. But it's certainly -- from a due diligence perspective, it's probably the things that we spend -- that Christy and her team spend the most time on, save for big anchor transactions.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#19

But it sounds like as we think -- when we talk about restaurants, you're not seeing really an impact today.

Daniel Busch

executive
#20

No, no. It's a healthy part of our business. What I would say any fallout that we've had is almost entirely operationally driven, and it's not an indication of like a soft -- the general softness at our centers or our markets.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#21

Got it. And then in terms of, just, kind of, expanding that pie a little bit, the local mom-and-pop tenants, they continue to perform well?

Daniel Busch

executive
#22

They do. We're always we have good insight with our mom-and-pop tenants. We get a decent amount of sales and productivity numbers from them. But over half of them, we have really good insight. The other half, Christy's team is speaking with them. I mean, we have 1,900 tenants. There's not many -- I'll say this a lot, but there's not many good things about being a small company. But one is we do have a really good understanding of our -- the health of our small shop tenants across the portfolio. We've lost a handful this year, but they were ones that have been on our watch list for several years and just they weren't able to make it work, which is fine. And we have suitable replacements. Mom-and-pops are always -- they're an important part of our business. I think what Dave, like 10% of our -- 10% of the portfolio is local mom-and-pop -- true mom-and-pop tenants like single-store operators. And they're important to those communities. And some of them are going to make it and some of them aren't, but it's important for us to continue to invest and try and find those opportunities because it's important to the communities they serve. They tend to be less capital intensive. But to your point, Samir, like in an environment where gas prices are up and there's other inflationary pressures, it's much more difficult for small shop tenants like that to absorb those costs relative to some of the larger operators.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#23

And maybe on the external growth side, you've been active on acquisitions, right? And you're, sort of, at a point where you've, kind of, reached -- you're approaching your, sort of, your net investment goals for the year. Like, I guess, maybe, just to expand that a little bit, like, what are you seeing in the transaction market? I mean, we were with Brixmor earlier. Obviously, there are certain cap rates here that we've seen compression in cap rates, especially in power centers as well now. So talk about, kind of, the overall market and, kind of, how we should think about your net investment goals for the year.

Daniel Busch

executive
#24

Yes, Dave, do you want to touch on that?

David Heimberger

executive
#25

Yes. So I think overall market, it was Brixmor, I'm sure Mark touched on just the amount of interest in retail. None of that's new. I think what we've seen over the past year is just whether it's a rotation within existing portfolios, movement from funds from multifamily assets into retail, whatever it is, the allocation, everyone's underweight retail. It's obviously driving pricing up, cap rates down. And for us, again, we're fortunate through the first half of the year to get close to our goal. That allows us to be really patient. So as we feel pricing get a little frothy, we can take a pause or we can move on to whether it's a different format, different market. That's why you've seen us, kind of, move into some of these emerging markets. There's a little bit of a pricing delta, although it's all catching up. So every time we make a move, what we think is 2 steps forward, the capital just, kind of, cast a wider net because the amount of people that are losing deals is still pretty significant. We're okay taking a pause. I think that allows us to think about our dispositions. We have a couple in market. Those are just, sort of, rotational opportunities that we'd like to take advantage of. Obviously, sellers are in a great position to sell assets into a market like this. That could free up some capital for us to rotate back through, kind of, reset a growth profile on an asset-by-asset basis. But I think the new thing for the back half of this year is really just more institutional capital, whether that's pensions coming in, wanting to be back into retail, some operator partnerships forming to help run that capital in retail. So just continue like a continuation of the competitive environment. At some point, as rates continue to run, maybe that could slow it down a little bit, but we haven't seen that just yet.

Daniel Busch

executive
#26

Yes. Just the only thing that I would add simply is, obviously, InvenTrust, we have a compelling internal growth story, but equally it's a compelling external growth story using the balance sheet. Having said that, we're not going to simply acquire things just to grow the business. They have to make sense, they have to make economic sense and they got to be accretive to cash flow at some point in the foreseeable future. That's the only way we can grow this business responsibly. So as Dave said, well, we can, kind of, turn off our activity very slowly off and on, while keeping a very robust pipeline, and we're always looking at things. And some are going to make sense and some won't. And we've had more cases recently with the amount of competition that haven't made sense from a pricing perspective, but that can change quickly and the market can move quickly, and we'll be ready to do that when the time comes.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#27

And did you say you have 2 properties in the market right now for sale? Is that right?

Daniel Busch

executive
#28

Yes.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#29

Okay. I was just curious, like, obviously, you lighten the load in California. What's, sort of, the disposition strategy at this point? Is it geographic? Is it individual internal growth considerations?

Daniel Busch

executive
#30

It's a little -- it's a little bit of both, right? Both are the considerations.

David Heimberger

executive
#31

One thing that we don't do is we're not looking at something that's going to generate growth or not generate growth next year and be shortsighted. We're looking at the long-term trajectory of the asset. Is it going to be competitive in 10 years' time? Is the grocer going to be competitive in 10 years' time within the market that it's supporting in certain markets? So we -- just under 50% of our assets come from Texas or our NOI comes from Texas. You could probably -- it's probably reasonable to think that that's going to shrink both through additional investment in other Southeast states and markets and maybe a little bit by divesting strategically out of some assets in Texas based mostly on grocer performance as opposed to any structural problem or with the market itself.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#32

And then in terms of the $290 million of acquisitions you've done year-to-date, what do you think enabled you to win those bids? I mean everyone's cash is as green as everybody else is, but what did you see in those opportunities that others perhaps didn't?

Daniel Busch

executive
#33

It's a good question. Dave will answer this better than I do. But there's a lot of different nuances that come along. Some of it is we can get to a better number. And maybe it's because we have more optimistic embedded rent underwriting estimates because we're already in those markets. Some of them have been first-mover advantage in some of these new markets that we've gone to and like a Knoxville or Greensboro. And others simply are because we've been repeat buyers from the same seller, and we ran a great process. And that matters a lot in our business, especially in a volatile market where there can be some sort of retrading going on. That's never been InvenTrust's strategy. Obviously, there's a shock to the system, you're allowed to take a pause. But we've always been very fair as with our counterparty, and that matters and execution is probably just as important, if not more important than price in some cases. I don't know, Dave, if you have anything you want to add?

David Heimberger

executive
#34

I echo all those comments. I think, like, as you saw us move in secondary markets, there was a point in time when we were 1 of maybe 2 institutions versus family office money that was competing on these deals. That is changing. So I think that led to early success in the year.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#35

For these markets you're going into, it's Charleston and some of these, sort of, newer markets, what's the going-in yield versus the core markets which you were sort of...

Daniel Busch

executive
#36

Well, it seems like it's changing quickly. We've gotten -- some of these new markets we're very fortunate that we started a little while ago because it has gotten more competitive to Dave's point, it seems like they've institutionalized almost overnight. I will say, on balance, like-for-like, we have found that the initial yield can be 25 to 50 basis points better than some of our like traditional core Sun Belt markets, which is a great spread relative to the growth profiles that we -- similar or even sometimes better growth profiles that we're seeing in some of these newer markets.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#37

So when you enter these new markets, is the goal always to build meaningful scale over time? Are you able to go into a new market and maybe say, own 1 or 2 assets within the area?

Daniel Busch

executive
#38

It's a great question. We never go to -- the goal is to build some sort of scale, but we don't have to. And sometimes it's not appropriate. I don't know if there are 5 assets in Knoxville that would fit InvenTrust criteria. But there could be 2, and we can operate it very efficiently with -- through either Nashville or Atlanta or Charlotte, like that works. Would we -- and would we go to -- and I'm using -- so Phoenix, and if we go back to our -- when we endeavored into building a Phoenix portfolio, that one it was important, one, it's one of the largest MSAs in the country. But two, it was far enough from the rest of our operating platform that it was important for us to have some, sort of, scale or at least visibility to some scale in the future to make that work for our business. Picking these little pockets of growth in the Southeast, I think that will be 1 or 2, maybe in some cases, 3, and we can operate those just as efficiently. When you, kind of, move out, let's use California example, one of the reasons -- one of the many reasons we decided to exit California is it was harder for us to operate. And we didn't really have scale there because we were, kind of -- we went from Northern San Diego all the way up to North L.A. County. And as a native Southern Californian, and that could take 25 hours and sometimes it seems like. So we do -- we weren't able to operate that as efficiently as we wanted to. We're already finding much more efficiencies in the corridors that we've built in the Phoenix MSA. But we have one asset in Nashville, we have one in Knoxville, we'd be very happy with those, but we're continuously canvassing for the next opportunity there as well.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#39

Is there any kind of risk to redevelopment in terms of, like, the competitive set? Like greenfield development economics don't make sense at all. You still -- replacement costs are way higher than what market rents are. Is there -- given the rise of rents and the compression in cap rates, is there markets that are vulnerable to that?

Daniel Busch

executive
#40

Vulnerable as far as.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#41

You have some crappy center down the...

Daniel Busch

executive
#42

Competing stock that could put redevelopment dollars to work. It could be. That math is even hard to make work in some cases. And cynically or skeptically, I should say, if a center at this point in the retail cycle, which has been quite strong for the better part of 6 years now coming out of COVID, if it still is under-leased, there's probably something more structurally wrong with it. Not to say that one of our competitors, well-capitalized competitors could come in and use one of their grocery relationships. That's always a risk. I think it's a lower -- I think it's a risk that we don't worry about that much because of the competitive positioning that some of our assets have in the market. And not forgot, we spend a decent amount of capital. It's a capital-intensive business. Retail always is. It's an operationally intensive business. Our assets tend to look really, really, really good. I mean we put a lot of capital to make sure our assets are great. It serves the customer very well, and the tenants are happy to where we can continue to raise rents and they can enjoy strong sales.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#43

And then just a question on capital allocation. Like you guys were trading right around a 6 cap, plus or minus 10 bps a couple of months ago. What was the rationale to not do a forward or do a convert at that pricing or something like that? [ It's a ] lock in?

Daniel Busch

executive
#44

It's a great question. I think for a company of our size, it's very, very important for -- we want to make sure that when we decide to tap the equity markets, if we have the opportunity to do so, it's going to be value-accretive for current investors as well as prospective new investors. At that point in time, now, one, there's a lot of nuances. There's a lot of blackout periods and stuff. And one of the things is that we don't want to do is issue equity at a peak and then have the stock underperform and no one makes money. We want to see a stable level in the stock price where we have a good understanding of what our current cost of capital is at any point in time because there wasn't quite a dramatic run-up and then obviously, it would come down quite a bit. But the reality is it comes down to use of proceeds. Do we have a good use of proceeds? And we had already closed $290 million. 2 or 3 -- in 2024 when we issued equity, we had a clear and identified use of proceeds that were going to be accretive. That to me was a compelling story as opposed to doing a forward and not having identified use of proceeds and making a call more or less on the stock price. I think that was -- I said a lot there, but that was, kind of, the rationale. We're trying to be very, very, very protective and careful with our capital. And it happened quick right now down -- there's obviously been a runoff. And we're -- there's certainly no regrets. We still have the balance sheet to support our business. And we want to make sure that our investors feel good about the trajectory of our business and the stock price when we do issue equity.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#45

Where do you think you could issue unsecured right now?

Daniel Busch

executive
#46

Great question. It'd probably be on an all-in rate, 50 basis points higher than where we did it in April on a blended basis. So like think about the tenor. I don't think so -- let me put it this way. We're at, what, 5% or so on a 10-year. I don't think spreads have changed that much. They may have contracted a tad because there still is demand for debt capital. But with the movement, I would just say whatever the treasuries have moved over the last -- so all-in coupon between tenor we'd be 6% to 6.5%...

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#47

And I mean that -- if we have this kind of environment for the next whatever few quarters, I presume that any kind of acquisition activity will be funded through asset sales.

Daniel Busch

executive
#48

It would be through asset sales or selective -- using the balance sheet selectively, but we're always assessing our incremental debt capital, Dennis, to your point, on permanent financing.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#49

So the net debt-to-EBITDA ticked up, right, I think, in the quarter? And so how are you thinking -- I guess, a similar question, how do you think about the mix of debt, dispositions, and equity to grow here?

Daniel Busch

executive
#50

Yes. So we're -- we can fully fund our strategy for the next 5 years and grow NOI by close to $100 million by putting another $0.5 billion or $0.5 billion or so of incremental debt on the balance sheet and still be well within our range. There was an uptick this quarter because we closed a lot of the assets at the end of the quarter, and it's quarterly annualized. So that will come down when we report third quarter earnings. It will look like a more normalized run rate. We're expecting to end the year sub-5 from a net debt-to-EBITDA standpoint. So still comfortably with a lot of capacity to continue to grow the business.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#51

One topic that comes up is cost and, sort of, CapEx and construction costs is up. Like how should we think about, sort of, CapEx as a percentage of NOI?

Daniel Busch

executive
#52

Yes. So funny, it's a great question. I think it's actually in our business, -- and if you think about -- we have 6 anchor vacancies across our portfolio, 3 of them are at a redevelopment site in [Tampa, AP]indiscernible] . So those are held for redevelopment. That will be something that -- it will be a multiyear redevelopment where we're relocating a grocer and bringing in some backfill junior anchors and refortifying the property for the next 30 years. The other 3 ones that the asset held for -- I shouldn't say that, the asset that we are planning to sell are the last asset in California. So that one is a nonissue. One was -- one more is in Richmond, Virginia, where we had a Painted Tree. Obviously, there was a bankruptcy earlier in the year. We have already re-leased that to Nordstrom Rack. So a fantastic outcome there. And then the last one was our last remaining Party City vacancy in Dallas -- in the Flower Mound market of Dallas. We're hopefully before, if not by the end of the third quarter, certainly by the end of the year, we'll have an exciting announcement on that last vacancy. So I say that because once those anchor vacancies are addressed, there is an environment where retention rate remains high. Small shop attrition is, kind of, normal, but retention stays above 90%. Right now, I think our run rate is -- for the year is right around 15% in NOI. I think that, that could be tick lower if you put aside those -- the major redevelopment I just spoke about, that could tick lower because tenant retention is the best thing for our business. We can grow rents. We don't have to put out new capital, and we can accelerate free cash flow growth. We just haven't had an environment where the anchors have -- you haven't had a whole lot of anchor turnover, and that's the real cost of the -- any type of tenant turnover, but the anchors certainly are the most arduous from a CapEx standpoint.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#53

Just in terms of your growth in your same store, I mean, you reported same-store was around 4% in the quarter, but you reaffirmed your guidance, right? I mean talk about, kind of, what keeps you from...

Daniel Busch

executive
#54

Yes. So year-to-date, so we're a little bit lower than the first quarter. So I think year-to-date through the first half, I think we're closer to 3.3%. So still trending, still have an opportunity to accelerate. I will say that I think in the third quarter, we do have some expenses that we'll be undertaking. So it will still be a little bit uneven, but with real acceleration in the fourth quarter to completely get to our guidance targets. Look, I think from a building block standpoint, the great thing about our business and many of our peers the same is we've been able to continuously build in recurring escalators, something that we haven't been able to do in the past. And every lease that we get our hands on, we're able to put in these escalators, whether it's on the base rent side or on the expense side. They're both important because what that is doing is it's taking this business that used to be a 2% business to something closer to a 3% to 4% business on a year-in, year-out basis. And if you can -- if that 3% to 4% business can also be met with lower CapEx profiles than what we've had in the past, now we have an FFO income stream that's compelling relative to other property types. So I think that's what we haven't had in the previous cycles that there is an opportunity for certainly the highest quality retail REITs to enjoy.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#55

I was just going to ask, over the years at the same time, have you seen tenants become more willing to pick up capital costs just to build off the questions from earlier. So this -- your capital efficiency is improving.

Daniel Busch

executive
#56

Yes. So yes and no. So grocers are great operating partners as it relates to capital contributions because they have a very long-term view, especially the private operators. So speaking specifically about the South -- like the powerhouse in the Southeast with Publix and H-E-B in Texas, like they tend to put in a significant amount of their own capital, which makes you feel good, and it's also great because it helps our returns or we have some capped contributions. Restaurants is very similar as it relates to what -- if it's a new concept that's unproven, we're going to expect them to pay a heavy level of that contribution. So we don't want to take on any undue risk. If it's a well-established restaurant, we'll certainly participate much more so. So it ebbs and flows, Dennis, but I think the one thing that hasn't changed is like anchor -- junior anchor repositioning and remerchandising is expensive. So the key for us is to make sure that we're partnering with the right junior anchors to where they can not only succeed through their initial lease term, but several options. And the longer they survive, the lower that CapEx burden becomes, right? There isn't one of the analyses that's impossible to do in our business is comparing CapEx across format and box size. So it's easy to come to the conclusion that anchors are more expensive. They are the moment that you're building them out. But the turnover in small shop tends to be higher. So how long does an anchor have to make it versus how long a small shop tenant has to make it before those capital costs have like some sort of breakeven point or cross. And I would say, in the next couple of years, we feel much more confident about our anchor lineup than we have in the past.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#57

All right. A couple of rapid-fire questions for you. So the first one, if long-term rates stay higher for longer, which has the biggest impact on your sector? Higher refinancing costs, lower transaction activity or less new supply?

Daniel Busch

executive
#58

The biggest impact on our sector?

Samir Khanal

analyst
#59

I guess sector earnings.

Daniel Busch

executive
#60

It will be refinancing costs.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#61

Yes. Number two, over the next 3 years, will third-party capital become a more important source of growth for public REITs than balance sheet capital? Yes or no, choose one.

Daniel Busch

executive
#62

Yes.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#63

Number three, for your sector, will 2027 next year same-store NOI growth be higher, same or lower?

Daniel Busch

executive
#64

Same.

Samir Khanal

analyst
#65

Thank you.

Daniel Busch

executive
#66

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete InvenTrust Properties Corp. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to InvenTrust Properties Corp. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.