Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 10, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Real Estate Residential REITs conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Richard Hill

analyst
#1

Good morning, and thanks for joining us. My name is Richard Hill. I'm Head of U.S. Commercial Real Estate Research at Morgan Stanley. I'm excited to be joined by Dallas Tanner, CEO of Invitation Homes; and Ernie Freedman, CFO of Invitation Homes. For those of you that might not be familiar with Invitation Homes, it is the nation's premier owner and operator of single-family rental homes in the United States with approximately 80,000 homes for lease in 16 markets across the country. Through disciplined markets and asset selection, they have assembled a high-quality portfolio focused on the Western United States and Florida. They target desirable neighborhoods in convenient proximity to major employments that have good schools and transportation corridors. They designed -- they have designed their portfolio of geographic concentration that cannot be easily replicated, providing economies of scale that enable them to efficiently and effectively serve their residents. A quick housekeeping item before we start. Please note that this webcast is for Morgan Stanley's clients and appropriate Morgan Stanley employees only. This webcast is not for members of the press. If you are a member of the press, please disconnect and reach out separately. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosures website at morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative.

Richard Hill

analyst
#2

So with that, let's jump right in, Dallas, Ernie. What I want to start off with is just an overview of the single-family rental market. We see it representing around 13% of the housing market and 35% of rentership. But institutional ownership is less than 3% of the 17 million stock of single-family rental homes. But -- so the question I would have is what inning in the sector are we from, from an institutional perspective? And if I can ask, where do you see this going in 3 years', 5 years', 10 years' time? How many homes can you actually own?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#3

Yes, it's a great question, Rich. And it's one that we continually emphasize when we're talking to The Street and to investors, it's still the earliest of innings in terms of where the industry as a whole is going to go. We're going to see continued growth, not only on the portfolio side with different operators, including ourselves, but we will see a tremendous amount of investment happen around the space in terms of ancillary companies that could help support what is a single-family rental experience. That took decades to develop in the multifamily space in the late '70s and early '80s, and we've seen a complete acceleration of some of this at a much quicker pace, just given where we are with technology and everything today. But you're exactly right. I mean there's probably less than, I would say, 400,000 homes that we would consider institutionally managed today in a professional, in a large-scale manner. And there's 16 million people that are renting in that category. And then coupled with the fact that I think you pointed out correctly, somewhere like 75 million households rent in the U.S., in one way, shape or form. So it's a huge opportunity for operators to create quality product, great services and an entry point that makes sense for potential renters.

Richard Hill

analyst
#4

Got it. So look, maybe just getting into the implications of COVID-19, which have been almost very positive for Invitation Homes in the single-family rental market. But look, we've heard that demand is booming. Our own channel check suggests new leasing spreads are in the high single digits. But I'm curious if you can talk through what markets you're seeing the greatest demand and how that has influenced your views on what markets you're in and what markets you might be in, in the future?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#5

Yes. I mean, to be clear, demand was booming pre-pandemic, and demand will continue to boom post-pandemic. I mean we've seen almost a year now of occupancy gains within our own portfolio. And on a year-over-year basis, we are continually seeing more applicants than we had product for, and that number is starting to compound. So just the lack of fundamental supply in the U.S. has led it to a very healthy environment for people that own single-family product. You're right in that COVID's probably put a little bit of a tailwind on it, a short-term tailwind in terms of creating maybe extra demand coming out of the urban centers. And that psyche may last for some period of time. But we're definitely seeing those high lease kind of year-over-year spreads that you're talking about in the majority of our portfolio, specifically in the West Coast. California, Washington, Arizona, Nevada, all have tremendous amount of demand. We're seeing it -- that kind of almost a similar reciprocal demand in markets like Charlotte and Atlanta and parts of Florida that all feel really, really healthy. So it comes down to what parts of those markets you're in, and we've tended -- as part of our overall strategy make sure that we're, one, very infill; two, we're at a little bit higher price point, which lends itself to some other demand factors that come into play, centered around great schools and transportation corridors, proximity. We were joking with you about it before. Proximity matters, right, when you're coming into work. And you want to be in a product that makes sense that isn't 1.5 hours away. And so we've made that a priority from day 1, just paying a little bit more up the curve, being in better neighborhoods, being surrounded by great schools and commercial activity.

Richard Hill

analyst
#6

Yes. Talking about your tenant base, I'd love to spend a little bit time -- a little bit of time describing the demographic of your tenant. There is some interesting parallels and differences to the apartment sector. But as you think about demographics, can you walk through why someone chooses to rent a single-family rental home versus buy? And by the way, has it shifted from a need to rent to really a desire to rent?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#7

That's a good question. So first, the first part of your question, who's our average renter today? And the average renter today is about 39 years old. It's typically a 2-earner situation in our homes with a combined household income of right around $110,000 when you average that across the portfolio. That demographic or that kind of family with a couple of kids typically falls into 1 of 3 buckets for us as we do our own survey. What's driving that decision -- and there's been a little bit of a shift I would say, in the last 2 to 3 months, which I'll share in a second. But generally speaking, they fall into 1 of 3 categories for us. First is either somebody that's out of need, meaning like they need the space of a single-family home, they need the yard, they have children, they have dogs, they have cats, whatever it is, but they can't do that in an apartment setting today based on their own needs. And that's out of necessity, but maybe they can't afford to buy. And so that represents about 30% of our survey data on who comes in. The next 2 buckets, which are pretty much equally split, say, 35% each are transitional, meaning they've got some sort of a life event occurring. They're testing out an area before they buy or maybe there's a new job, a new marriage, a divorce, whatever, that's created a moment, a transitioning moment in their life, and they're needing to do this for some period of time. And then the last third is what we call preferential. And that is kind of all over the map. It's people that can, quite frankly, afford to own, but they choose to lease for a variety of reasons, either they like being down payment-light, maybe it's a second home for them or even -- we're seeing some boomers do it. Take chips off the table and lease back. And so that preferential bucket is one that we're pretty keen on understanding more as the business grows because that may lend itself to other ancillary opportunities down the road. And then the last little bit is we've seen, obviously, since the pandemic a little bit of shift in some of the decision-making of our residents. So in some of the data, we've gotten response from about 10% of the folks that have moved in between April and August, but it's a pretty large sample set. When we go through there and we look at what's driving those decisions, about 70% are moving into a single-family home versus an apartment because they either want more space or they want to be further out from an urban core. And so there definitely is kind of a near-term preference to having a bit more space and maybe being a little bit outside of the city center right now.

Richard Hill

analyst
#8

Got it. Ernie, I want to turn to you for a second. Dallas mentioned ancillary income. I'm wondering if you can just talk through the drivers of internal growth and what additional sources of revenue is there beyond base and minimum rent growth? Because rising tide lifts all boats to various different degrees, but I'm sure you look to distinguish yourself relative to peers by really pushing other sources of income. So can you walk through that a little bit?

Ernest Freedman

executive
#9

Absolutely, Rich. It's an excellent point. Certainly, we like the prospects for how rent growth may proceed over the next period of time. As you mentioned in your introduction, we're seeing accelerating fundamentals of rent growth that we typically wouldn't see out of our peak season. We are a bit of a seasonal business in terms of being busier and typically driving more rent in the summer months when people are typically moving, but we're seeing more of an acceleration into the winter than we've ever seen before. That said, we're really excited about our other opportunities. And Dallas alluded to in his last comment, where we can provide additional services that our residents may want and desire and find valuable. And so today, we're doing some things, 2 things that we're doing today are, one, is providing Smart Home technology for our residents. It's not a really Smart Home when you think about the technology that's available today. But it's pretty basic, whether it's access from a door lock perspective and it's a smart thermostat. But we're also looking at other opportunities around potentially video doorbell, security systems, et cetera, that would tie into that platform. So we're really excited about that. And when someone moves into our home, 80% of the time they choose to subscribe to the Smart Home technology and keep that in place. We originally have put it in place for efficiency purposes to help us lease the home and allow for self-showing in an -- which is very important in an environment like this. But it's actually turned into a revenue generator for us as well, not just an efficiency savings for us. Another program that we rolled out this year and we're having good success with is our filter program, which doesn't sound real exciting, but actually has some really nice bottom line impacts for us. Our residents are required to change the filters in their homes every 3 months. So that's -- the operating system, if think about the HVAC system, the furnace, the air-conditioning, look at the efficiency. But a lot of residents don't know what size filter to get, don't want to take the time to run to Home Depot or Lowe's to get that. And so we're now drop shipping filters on many leases to our residents. It's the correct size. They're dated. So when our service techs might be doing a service call at the home, we can see that the filters have been changed, and we expect that it's going to provide for a longer useful life for our systems. So it's a win for the residents, it makes something easier for them. And it's a win for us because we should have systems that get a little bit more useful life out as well. And then as we think about what's next for us, Rich, we're looking at things around pets. Dallas mentioned the fact that the vast majority of our residents have a pet, whether it's a dog or a cat. And so there's lots of services we can potentially tie into that. And then we're also looking, not to be confused with pests, in terms of pest control and make it again easier for residents to be able to get a good service and a good price at a more discounted price they would otherwise be able to get and, again, would help maintain the homes for us. So those are some of the things that are in the near term that we're focused on. And then we have a list of over 60 items that we've identified as possibilities. And we're just working through those one at a time. And the nice thing about our portfolio is with 80,000 homes spread across 16 markets, we can pilot something in 1 market or 2 markets. If it goes well, we can then roll it out across the country. And if it doesn't, we learn quickly that it's not one of our better ideas and we can move on to the next. And so we don't have a huge investment that we have to make into any of these upfront to see whether it may be a success or not. So we're really excited about the prospects of additional revenue streams that we can provide our shareholders.

Richard Hill

analyst
#10

Yes. I couldn't go through 30 minutes without asking you an earnings-related question and earnings, not an Ernie-related question, to be clear. So you put up really pretty strong same-store revenue growth in 2Q and 3Q. And one of the things I'm not sure everyone recognize is you did that despite there being a bad debt headwind and a headwind from other income from not charging late fees. I'm not asking an earning -- a guidance question by any means. But can you talk about how in the future at some point maybe those headwinds might become tailwinds because, at some point, the coin will flip on the other side and how you think about that from an operating metric standpoint?

Ernest Freedman

executive
#11

Yes. It's a good question, Rich. Because you're right to point out, in the second quarter, in the third quarter, we put up core revenue growth of 2% and 2.4%. And one of the things that was helping to boost those numbers was the fact that we've been able to run at a higher occupancy. But what's really been a headwind for us against those numbers, to the tune of almost 250, 300 basis points, have been those items that you mentioned that we would hope -- would think that would not be permanent in terms of how we think about how we run the business. One of those is bad debt. Yes. Not surprisingly, in the environment we're in, cash collections aren't quite where they've been at from a historical perspective. From a historical perspective, we typically collect about 99% of our rent the month that it's due. During the pandemic, we've been closer to 97% to 96% -- about 97%, so about 200 basis points off. What that means is we're -- typically, in the past, our bad debt is around about 40 basis points annually. Right now, if you annualize our bad debt, it probably will be closer to 200 basis points because we're not collecting as much cash -- we're collecting most of our cash, but not all of it. We would expect at some point that would revert back to historical norms, just because of the strength of our resident base and as we work our way through the pandemic and the economic impacts from that. So that should certainly be a tailwind for us in the future. And as we go back, what we would expect at some point, to more of our historical run rate of bad debt of, say, 40 basis points, that easily will be 150, 200 basis point tailwind for us. And the other item you mentioned is that we typically collect about 1% of our revenue annually from late fees. Some residents chooses, as they're managing their own pocketbook, to take advantage of the fact that they do have the ability to pay rent a little bit late, and we charge a modest fee for that. That, we've stopped charging for the most -- almost entirely across our portfolio in the second quarter. We started charging some late fees in the third quarter. We've taken the tack that if a resident is working with us, they may be struggling because of the economic situation, we're not going to charge them a late fee if they're working with us. And then in some jurisdictions, there's rules locally that don't allow us to charge late fees. And so we've had about 100 basis point hit to our revenue growth year-over-year in both the second and third quarter because we were not charging late fees like we have in past. And so between those 2 items, Rich, if we were to look back again to historical norms sometime in the next period of time as we would hope things normalize, that could be a nice pickup for us on a year-over-year basis. In fact, we have an easy comp as you think about what our revenue growth could be going forward. And then we're confident in how we're running the business, we can maintain higher occupancy for all the reasons Dallas talked about, about the demand fundamentals that are so strong right now.

Richard Hill

analyst
#12

Dallas, I want to transfer back to you for a second. Ernie was talking about technology and homes, Smart Homes, but I got to think that technology itself is allowing you to expand margins as well, but also maybe more efficient on how you acquire homes. Can you talk about how technology is evolving? I've personally been surprised about some of the commentary and anecdotes I've heard about virtual tours of homes that were up for sale during the COVID pandemic. So it seems like maybe we're on the cusp of another technological evolution that can make buying and selling homes and single-family rentals much more efficient. But you're in the front lines, I'd love to hear from you on that.

Dallas Tanner

executive
#13

Yes. You nailed it. I mean if you just look at where we are versus where we were maybe 10 years ago, in terms of the type of technology that can go into us helping make decisions around an asset, whether you're a renter or a buyer, it's pretty remarkable. I mean the floor plans that we're mapping out right now and correlating with the way you can -- there's companies now that are taking mockups of furniture and being able to put those over those floor plans where somebody can actually get a sense for how that home would look and feel with their stuff. That's pretty remarkable. We are mapping our portfolios now or upgrading the way that we share some of that information digitally, which has a profound impact in that regard in terms of how we prelease. I mean we get really efficient. I mentioned on our earnings call, days to re-resident is down for us year-over-year pretty dramatically. And a large part of that has to do with our ability to be able to lease a home before it becomes vacant. In the old days, and the old days could be as early as 7 or 8 years ago, you wouldn't lease something site unseen, right? Now in today's universe, if you know you've got a great home and a good neighborhood and you can get a good sense through 3D mapping and virtual tours of how that home will feel going in and out of it, with whether your stuff may be able to fit or not fit, you can make a decision or, at a very minimum, tie up a home with a healthy deposit, right? And that overall helps operators like us that we can make decisions quicker -- or excuse me, our customers can make decisions quicker and we can provide a better level of service in turning that home faster to have somebody -- which all eliminates drag in our business. The other things that we see around technology, to your point, are really interesting in the way that information is being shared on the buy-sell environment. And what someone can do in today's environment, being able to buy assets remotely or get a sense around where your pricing should be remotely before you've been able to go in and do an inspection on a home. Now we put eyes on every asset that we buy. That's just the nature of our principles in terms of underwriting. But we certainly can disseminate quite a bit of information through a funnel in a much quicker fashion using the tools and technologies we've built and adapted to over time. It also has an ability to impact our leasing curve. You start to think about how smart our portfolio gets, every year, we're getting like 20% or 25% smarter because we've turned 20%, 25% of the portfolio in a given year. And we've been able to look at what our data is doing on a compounding basis year-over-year makes us that much smarter about how our lease expiration curve should look and feel. It helps us maximize pricing and efficient occupancy. And so as you look at kind of all of those things, there are companies, third-party services, there are a number of things that we're plugging into that are providing us with tremendous amounts of raw data that we can then put through our algorithms and our AcquisitionIQ tools, that can help us make informed decisions about where we want to grow our footprint and our portfolio. And then the mechanisms for buying, like we've talked about, iBuyers, a number of these channels where technology is making things easier, are one of a dozen tools that we have at our disposal that continue to grow the portfolio. So we're not really beholden to any one tool. We say this all the time, we're channel-agnostic, but we are location-specific in terms of how we want to invest. And we want to use all those technology bits that are available to us to try and drive additional opportunities.

Richard Hill

analyst
#14

So guys, a couple of questions coming over the webcast. First, I think this is a really important one. But what's the key differentiator between Invitation Homes, other public companies and maybe even the private operators? It seems like every hour of every day, we hear another person getting into the single-family rental space, which is great. But what's your real differentiator? What's making you different than Tricon, American Home 4 Rent and maybe even some of the smaller private guys that might be out there?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#15

Well, it's a little bit of a loaded question, but I'll tell you what we feel like makes a real difference. And Ernie, feel free to add anything to this. Scale, first and foremost. It's so hard to replicate scale. And you really come to appreciate it when you run these businesses. Our average markets have 5,000-plus homes. Market like Atlanta, we have 12,500 homes. Our Atlanta market is bigger than the majority of the operators that are out there today, just that one market. And you start to think about the quality of people, the quality of services, the types of technology you can invest in with scale versus not having it, it's a night and day difference. The other piece of it, too, Rich, is we're in the right markets. We haven't chased every market in the country. We're really focused on high barrier to entry, high demographic growth footprint in markets. And it's all typically centered around kind of this mile where we're seeing all the growth and the outperformance. And so I think our scale and our locations are second to none.

Ernest Freedman

executive
#16

And Rich, I'll just add in that when you compare us to -- we get the question often about comparing to other public companies. I think you asked about private company comparison. And I think an important differentiator between us and most private companies is they're typically chasing a little bit more yield. So they'll go after a little bit more of the yieldier product, probably put on a lot more leverage than you would ever consider putting on in order to juice those short-term returns. But we're more focused on long-term growth and more focused on total return. And so you'll certainly see what we're buying is at a higher price point, both in terms of cost and in terms of where average rents come in. And so what's interesting is all this capital is coming into the space, which we think is great. It's not necessarily competing against us from an investment perspective because it's typically going after more yieldier markets, markets that may have some overlap with us but generally don't. But even within those markets where there's overlap, it's not typically the same product. And there's no right or wrong way to do it. It's just a different strategy. Our strategy is to be focused on total returns, long-term growth, both cash flow appreciation as well as capital appreciation.

Richard Hill

analyst
#17

Got it. Dallas, coming back to you in a comment that you made previously, another question coming in. I think it's from maybe an investor that's maybe a little bit more of a journalist investor and not familiar with your history. But can you -- specifically, can you talk about Zillow and the liquidity, that instant liquidity that they're providing? Is that really a competitive advantage? How are you working with Zillow and other iBuyers? I think you've had a long relationship with them, in particular. But I'd love to just hear a little bit more about the instant liquidity to buy homes off of their website, if that is a game changer to any degree.

Dallas Tanner

executive
#18

Yes, absolutely. And I would just go back to saying, we've had the benefit for the last 8 years as a company to pay cash and to close quick, right? And so Zillow has basically taken those types of buyers and opened doors, done this as well and created a platform where if you want liquidity for your home now, they have an ability to take you on their balance sheet and then they'll likely sell the home to a third party or group like us. And that's been another interesting channel and an opportunity for growth. I think any time you get the traffic -- the web traffic like a company like Zillow has in the residential space and you create optionality for folks, that's viewed as a huge positive. I think what we'll see these companies evolve over time is they'll capture a lot of the transactions, probably doing less on balance sheet over time, but being more of a middleman or a middle market between buyers and sellers of homes, whether it's an Invitation Homes or a Rich Hill end user that wants to buy that home because they want to live in it. And so I would just say, we were very supportive. We know the guys over there very well, both called the Zillow mothership and also the team that is running the Zillow offers program that they're building up, all really smart, intelligent guys that understand the single-family rental space. So that's been an easy kind of plug in and play. Same would be said for some of the other iBuyer channels. And I bet we have 2 or 3 of these companies that end up being here for a long time. I think it will be interesting to see how they adjust the ancillary sides of their business and how they drive additional revenue into that. But we view that as nothing but a positive to what we're trying to do.

Richard Hill

analyst
#19

Yes. And so another question coming in, maybe someone that reads our research and something that we've discussed on our virtual roadshow that we did a couple of months back. But there's obviously an aging baby boomer population that's lived in houses for longer periods of time. And I thought it was really interesting where you talked about sale-leaseback opportunities with that cohort of the population. I suspect it's still in its infancy, but can you talk about the opportunity to maybe capitalize on aging baby boomer population that can't live in their homes forever?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#20

Well, it's one part that. It's also helping people unlock equity and creating flexibility if they want to spend time in a couple of parts of the country, chase warmer weather. My parents are going through this very same thought process right now. They're selling their home in Arizona, and they want to come -- maybe have something where they -- for a few months a year in Dallas, right? Seeing my kids. And so I think tapping into some of that decision-making tree is a plus. And at the end of the day, Ernie and I sit back and we say, we want to be the best owner of single-family rental in the country, right? And so we've got to create products and opportunities or decision points for customers that are maybe not always one dimensional. So how do we create an environment where people can sell us the home, lease it back for 5 or 10 years, create flexibility. There's an array of products we can offer. And so it's definitely something we're working on. We've done it, just to be clear, off and on over an 8-year period. We did it through kind of the 2012-'13 foreclosure crisis where people were losing homes and we had an ability to buy and be able to keep people in their homes that we still have people today that lease from us 8 years later on a home that we bought, but they love their home, and we've worked with them to stay in their home and to make sure that that works for them. And then we've also bought homes from people that wanted to cash out or create an equity moment and still want to stay in the neighborhood and lease back from us. We've done it. So I think commercializing that product, finding a way with our partners at Zillow, Opendoor and also internally, of creating programs where you can do this and it can repeat itself over time and distances, one of the areas that we're hyper focused on. We want to get this right. We think we can do it internally. We think we can do it with partners. And I think it's about creating awareness about the program. Much like how we sell homes back into the market, we let our residents buy those. We've now done that almost 200x in our portfolio. And so we want to create to continue to expand these products so that they can take on a life of their own and create a lot of volume for the company.

Richard Hill

analyst
#21

Great. One of the things that we haven't discussed, and I think this is probably coming from someone that follows your company closely is the JV you recently announced. We've seen other people announce JVs. Can you talk about the amount of capital that gives you to reinvest in the single-family rental market and what that means both near term and long term?

Dallas Tanner

executive
#22

Well, I think if you look at the way our stock price has done a little bit of this over the last, say, 4, 5, 6 months, it was really crazy when the pandemic hit. So I don't put too much salt in that, but you just -- the volatility of where you're trading at any given time right now has been unique. And as Ernie and I have looked back at not slowing down our ability to grow and to continue to deleverage through growth, one of the ways that we -- as we kind of were pressure testing some of these ideas over the past couple of years was, it might make sense if you could have a really flexible partner that aligned with you culturally, that gave you all the ROFO protections and everything you wanted down the road so that you could put these assets on balance sheet, what if you had a JV when times are weird or when you didn't feel great about issuing? And that was really kind of the premise for going in was how can we create a pool of capital that gives us better flexibility, doesn't slow down the machine, so to speak, so that we can continue to grow. And by the way, when we invest on balance sheet, which we've been doing for the most of this year, except for shutting it down for a month or 2 after the pandemic started, we've always been careful capital allocators. I think that's something we've gotten high marks from, from The Street, just making sure that we have the right capital allocation in the right markets. And I mentioned Atlanta earlier. We have 12,500 homes in Atlanta today, and we'll incrementally on the margin add a few homes here or there when we're selling. Well, Rich, that market is still ripe with investment opportunity. And so why not bring in a partner where we can take advantage of some of that as well on an incremental basis, but still be able to invest in Denver and Dallas and some of these other markets on balance sheet, where we want to get additional scale? And so that's really the logic. It's really a strategic hedge. The market volatility also gives us amazing flexibility. The partners that we picked -- and we didn't have to go to market. To be clear, we really were able to kind of pick and choose who we wanted to talk to because of the amount of capital, as you mentioned earlier, Rich, that wants to get into the space. We wanted somebody that understood that we didn't need the capital, but it would be a nice to have. And if we could have the right structure, have the flexibility, it's going to be a great thing for our shareholders because what it does is allows the company to generate fees both from an AUM perspective and a property management perspective. There's a promote, which will benefit the company as well on how the assets do. We can use a little bit more leverage in that vehicle than we would on balance sheet where we're deleveraging through just growth and buying assets with cash. And it allows us to continue to take advantage of opportunities we see and ultimately likely put them on our balance sheet 5, 6 years down the road. And so as we -- and look, we see enough opportunity there. We'll invest this capital over a couple of years, alongside investing in our own capital. It'd just be a plus-plus for the organization over the long haul.

Ernest Freedman

executive
#23

And Rich, it really gives us -- it gives us the opportunity to purchase about $1 billion-plus of homes in the joint venture. And then we had cash on hand at September 30 of over $500 million. So we've got runway to do acquisitions of about $1.5 billion over the next period of time. So if those opportunities are there, we'll take advantage of them, and we know we have capital to do it.

Dallas Tanner

executive
#24

That's a good point. Yes, sorry, Rich, the other thing I'd add is it doesn't preclude us from going to The Street and raising money. So if we see opportunities at an attractive point, we can continue to raise equity and continue our own balance sheet growth.

Richard Hill

analyst
#25

No, no, this is great. That's exactly where I want it to end. To me, look, it sounds like the very best is still in front of you guys, which is exciting to hear. We do have a couple more questions coming in, but in the interest of our time at 30 minutes, I'm going to stop it there. Thanks very much for your partnership today. And if there's any other questions from anyone on the phone or on the webcast, please feel follow -- please feel free to follow up with me directly. I'll make sure those are answered with Invitation Homes. Dallas, Ernie, thanks for joining us. Everyone on the webcast, thanks for participating today. I appreciate your time, guys. Take care.

Dallas Tanner

executive
#26

Thank you, Rich. Take care.

Ernest Freedman

executive
#27

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Invitation Homes Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Invitation Homes Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.