Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 2, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Patrick Trucchio
analystHello, everyone, and good afternoon, and welcome back to H.C. Wainwright BioConnect Investor Conference in partnership with NASDAQ. I'm Patrick Trucchio. I'm the senior health care analyst at H.C. Wainwright. It's my pleasure to introduce our next speaker, Dave Hering, CEO of Invivyd, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on delivering antibody-based therapies to protect vulnerable people from devastating consequences of circulating viral threats, starting with SARS-CoV-2 and then expanding to flu and other high-need indications.
Patrick Trucchio
analystSo maybe we can start first with just some brief background on Invivyd, including the history of the company.
David Hering
executiveSure. Thanks, Patrick, and thanks for having me here. Invivyd was created during the pandemic. It's only a few years old with the goal, exactly as you said, of bringing products to market, starting with COVID and going from there. And originally, we had an initial compound ADG20, which we took into the clinical trial and now pivotal data -- I'm going to use this instead and use that. We took it into clinical trials and delivered against all of our endpoints in record time. And so that was the impetus and start of this. And now really, what we're envisioning for the company is a serial monotherapy approach to delivering products against COVID-19. And so what we've seen is one single or a combination of antibodies is highly unlikely to remain active against a virus like SARS-CoV-2 that continues to evolve. And so we've geared the company directly to address that ongoing threat of the virus, and that's really where we are today.
Patrick Trucchio
analystCan you talk more about which patients Invivyd is going to focus on? Where is the unmet need at this stage of where we are with the disease?
David Hering
executiveYes. I mean, interestingly, you've got this case where vaccine efficacy in prevention of symptomatic disease has plummeted against the current variants, which is unfortunate for where we are. That plummeting efficacy is due to the viral evolution and change in variants. The most recent bivalence that were boosted have the ancestral Wuhan strain and BA.4, .5. We're now into BQs and XBBs. And some of the new data shows that there is limited to no efficacy in preventing symptomatic disease in the XBB-Omicron sublineages. This has also led to continual waves of disease and, unfortunately, also emerging evidence of reinfections and what the potential long-term impacts could be. And that's to people who mounted immune response to vaccines and need prevention. When you talk about immunocompromised people in particular, vulnerable populations, they don't even have the benefit of a minimal response or use of vaccines. Monoclonal antibodies are designed for prevention, treatment and post exposure, and they were an instrumental part of the fight against COVID-19 that has been eliminated. So I know we'll talk about it some more. But right now, we are where we were in 2020, which is there are no monoclonal antibodies on the market for prevention. You have immunocompromised people with a significant unmet need. We talk to them every day with our patient advocacy groups. And while the rest of us have more or less gone back to leaving our houses and going back to where we were, these are folks who feel trapped and nowhere to go. And so that patient population, in particular, is one that we're targeting as a preventative approach and to give them a product that provides them hope.
Patrick Trucchio
analystRight. And then maybe talk a little bit more about Invivyd's antibody platform? What's differentiated about this platform and the approach?
David Hering
executiveYes. So the antibody platform comes from our own internal discovery as well as partnerships. The company utilizes a technology from Adimab for yeast expression. And what we then do is something differentiated from other antibody manufacturers, which is we do engineering of antibodies, which is affinity maturation. This allows us to find antibodies that wouldn't be just naturally occurring. So yes, we do B cell mining and look for those. But this engineering approach gives us, as I said, antibodies that we see should have less immune pressure. Hence, the goal is to increase the probability of higher durability, higher duration in the market. And that to us is one of the differentiating factors of our platform.
Patrick Trucchio
analystRight. Maybe you can also give us an overview around the partnership activity, how some of these came about? What's the strategic importance of the current partnerships in your operations?
David Hering
executiveYes. As I said, I mean, I mentioned the work we've done with Adimab. We have an existing relationship with them. That really has been one of the foundations and building blocks of the antibodies. We've now continued to evolve that partnership. We're in the process of transferring in some of the technology into our own internal labs, which is then, again, what we could be using for both COVID as well as other infectious disease down the road. We have a strong partnership with WuXi, which is a manufacturer, which allows us to rapidly produce antibodies both for clinical trials as well as for commercial production. And so those 2 are really critical in terms of our goals to be able to move through development rapidly, find antibodies perpetually and deliver them and have products on the market sustainably.
Patrick Trucchio
analystSo recently, the FDA cleared VYD222 for an IND. I'm wondering if you can talk about the VYD222 program, where did this kind of -- how did it come about and some additional details around kind of where you see this program going from here.
David Hering
executiveYes. 222 is very exciting. It's our reengineering strategy in action. So 222 is a reengineered version of ADG20, which was our original compound. We shifted 8 amino acids in the variable region that targets the spike protein of the virus. And so basically, what we did is take those connection points and just pivot them slightly so that we could recreate activity with the antibody against the Omicron sublineages. And to date, in vitro, we've shown activity against all of them through XBB1.5, and that's what we continue to monitor. We're excited about this for a variety of reasons. One, you talked about the IND. In December of this past year, there was an FDA-EMA meeting. And in that meeting, they specifically talked about this prototype concept where if you have a prototype product, you could then use that to either accelerate or augment your package for regulatory. And so by starting with ADG20, which I mentioned we already have conducted clinical trials extensively across prevention, post-exposure, pre-exposure, we are hoping to utilize that as a part of the 222 development program, both in terms of safety and totality of data. So that's the exciting part there. We also see this as the scaffold that we can utilize going forward. And that is important because, as I've said, we expect viral evolution to continue, unfortunately, with the SARS CoV-2 virus. And so we are continuing to put new antibodies into our pipeline to address that going forward.
Patrick Trucchio
analystYes. That's helpful. And then a couple of follow-ups. Just the first around the regulatory framework that you mentioned, how has this evolved? I mean I think all of us are familiar with kind of how COVID drugs were approved previously. How is it evolving now? Is there kind of a precedent being set for accelerated regulatory pathways for COVID drugs?
David Hering
executiveYes. I mean -- and it is an evolving landscape, as you can imagine. Even for our original ADG20 product, we saw that as more and more people got vaccinated, that changed the paradigm. And then you had oral antivirals that came to market, and that changed it. And so you could no longer run placebo-controlled trials in the U.S. for treatment, right? So that was a big change. The original studies in most monoclonal antibodies were clinical endpoint event trials, meaning you were testing placebo and drug and testing who got symptomatic COVID-19, right? So you are looking to find areas around the world with high disease incidents to be able to get at this data quickly. What's evolving now is this approach using surrogate and biomarkers in order to do these studies much more rapidly. There is a recognition globally amongst regulators that the pace of what I call human nature or the regulatory side isn't keeping up with mother nature. That's why we continue to have these gaps where we have no products on the market like we currently have. And so the approach here continues to look at how to use surrogate and biomarkers in order to do trials more effectively and efficiently. And that's really our approach with 222. We recently published a paper specifically talking about relative protection and utilizing serum-neutralizing titer levels and comparing that to efficacy data. You could also see with AstraZeneca in their new SUPERNOVA trial that they are using a bridging study. And so again, you can see this shift away from clinical event endpoints to biomarker surrogate correlative protection, which we see as a great step in the right direction for how we as a society are going to be able to stay ahead of the variants.
Patrick Trucchio
analystSo just back on VYD222, can you talk about some of the preclinical data that you've generated so far and how you would expect that to translate as you bring this program forward to Phase I?
David Hering
executiveYes. So the preclinical data, right, we have -- we can continue to conduct both pseudovirus assay in vitro testing, which shows IC50 in activity levels with those data. And then looking at a variety of PK modeling, you can start to get a good estimate of duration of protection against the current variants. And so it's a space like no other than I'm aware of in biotech, where already in preclinical and doing in vitro work, you already have a good sense of what the potential efficacy could be of your drug. So before you've done Phase I, before you've done Phase II or III, you're starting to get that early read. We continue to do that. You do your normal panel of rat TOX and TCR and the rest. And so we've continued to conduct those. But I think, like I said, the most important are these early views of how the product is going to work well before you're doing these large-scale trials.
Patrick Trucchio
analystRight. Now the original time line for antibody development that you went through is around 16 months, and I think you mentioned the goal is to do it much quicker, much faster and cheaper. So how should we think about this condensing of the time line, particularly around the use of these surrogates and biomarkers? How much quicker could this time frame become?
David Hering
executiveYes. I mean, today, we see this ability to go faster, right? That's really the goal, just as you said. Part of that is because recruitment of trials can happen much quicker. We're currently working on the design for our pivotal trial. We're in discussions with regulators. Once we have that finalized, we'll certainly communicate broadly what that trial looks like. But if you want to look at proxies for speed and time, you can look at what AstraZeneca is doing. They have started their combination of Phase I, Phase III, this trial, and they continue to put out guidance that they're looking to be in the market before the end of the year. And so the pace of development in this space is like none other that I'm aware of.
Patrick Trucchio
analystYes. And just in terms of the time line for VYD222, so I think in the second quarter, we're going to get the first Phase I data. How important is that data as you're looking to design the Phase III trial? Presumably, you take that data to the FDA. Or what does that look like? And what is the ideal scenario for Invivyd as you go forward as you're looking at the Phase III?
David Hering
executiveYes. So the Phase I data, safety, tolerability, dose ranging is what we're looking at there. In Q2, we'll have preliminary data that we plan to read out Interestingly, not only would we get information on the dose-ranging piece, but we would get this initial read on. Again, you can get this serum neutralizing virus titer levels. And then using the curve in the publication that we put out in March, you get this early read on what the efficacy is going to look at. So that's an important indicator for us. The data there will then support which dose we want to take into the Phase III. Really, it's less about looking at that from a safety and tolerability, but more getting some of the PK information, the half-life data from the Phase I, which then will inform really the dose selection for the Phase III and while we're doing that, finalizing the design with the FDA.
Patrick Trucchio
analystSo you mentioned earlier, just the Astra program is a Phase I/III combined program. I think they're looking to bring that product to market in the second half of this year. So maybe you could talk a little bit about what does that look like? Is that an emergency pathway -- emergency authorization pathway? And when the emergency ends this month, what does that look like? Is that still available? And would you expect to follow the path that Astra is -- is there any reason you wouldn't be able to follow their footsteps?
David Hering
executiveYes. A bunch of good questions. So first, in the U.S., yes, we continue to see emergencies authorizations as a pathway that's open. One was given to a product just recently in April for a very niche severely sick individuals that was recently granted an EUA. Everything that we've looked at, the FDA continues to have this authorization even after the public health emergency ends. As we've noted, there are no products on the market for immunocompromised individuals. All the monoclonal antibodies have been removed in the U.S. Ex U.S., there are options outside EUAs. We've seen EMA, in particular, also quite interested in this biomarker approach. So we have ongoing discussions with them. But yes, we see the EUA pathway continuing in the near term. And the longer-term goal is to take the platform and look to get a licensure on the platform, similar to what you would see in COVID vaccines or flu vaccines where you have an approval, and you update them on some sort of time frame, usually seasonally or yearly, et cetera. And for those strain changes in vaccines, they don't go back and redo clinical trials. And so if you can use the scaffold, as I said, the manufacturing platform, et cetera, that, to us, is a good longer-term approach for how we would be able to deal with continued viral evolution and have products continually on the market without these gaps.
Patrick Trucchio
analystSo just thinking about the competitive set, which has also been evolving. A number of the antibody developers have essentially dropped out, but AstraZeneca, of course, is moving forward. And then Regeneron has a new antibody approach that they're taking forward, and then we have the small molecules on the market. So how do we think about positioning of 222 relative to small molecules for post-infection treatment? And then relative to having another Astra molecule in the market for prevention, where does 222 fit in?
David Hering
executiveYes. First, I mean, it's an interesting space because it's not like other drug development. As I said, we haven't seen any other drug development that's faster, higher probability, bigger market opportunity than this in terms of where we are. Where I think a lot of folks were is they saw this initial huge opportunity when all of us were locked home to develop drugs. And then over time, that interest has shifted into other disease areas because what we see is the pandemic part of COVID has gone away, but what's left is the infancy of this new disease category in the endemic state. And so this opportunity is different from others in that, as I said, as an antibody manufacturer, you have the opportunity to work against the disease and treatment prevention and post exposure. We see prevention in this vulnerable population as a huge unmet need, one that you can target the population specifically, you can get to the health care providers and find these folks. They're highly attuned to wanting the products. And so for a company our size, in particular, looking at what a commercial model would look like, it's a very attractive market. And recently, AstraZeneca, in their earnings a week or so ago, still mention this as a blockbuster market opportunity for them. And we agree. I mean it's still a multi-multibillion-dollar market, just looking at the prevention in immunocompromised. And so we see the biggest competition in this space really coming from the virus itself and how it evolves. There isn't a situation here currently where it's going to be a one company takes all kind of piece. And when you look at the almost certain evolution of the virus. We think that our strategy for the near and longer term to continue to have available antibodies in our pipeline to plug and swap in as the virus evolves is the one that will be the best approach.
Patrick Trucchio
analystI think when Omicron came about, that was very surprising to a lot of folks out there. And I'm wondering what is the probability that there's another Omicron-like event. And what would you do? How quickly could you reengineer?
David Hering
executiveYes. That's a great question. What I would say is, right now, we've continued to add a great degree of surveillance into our capabilities. And with that, we're looking at mutations, evasion to antibodies. That's what leads us to continue to be testing in the background of different antibodies in our pipeline. And with the current Omicron sublineages, and there are hundreds and thousands of these, many of which don't go anywhere. But what we're tracking is ones that may have a fitness advantage, ones which may have a mutation that could cause a problem in tracking them globally. So my long answer to that question is we have pretty good visibility in the Omicron sublineages. If there's another major shift from Omicron to, say, higher growth, that's much harder to predict and see. But I think the approach is the same in terms of being able to quickly do this work. And I think it's that threat that's also on the minds of regulators and the broader environment because Omicron has had lesser severe outcomes, right, less hospitalizations, less death. But there's no guarantee that the next major change will do that. And so when we talk to governments, there's still a lot of concern about pandemic preparedness, et cetera. And so while maybe the rest of society has stopped thinking about COVID, certainly, if you're a government health official, you're worried about what that could be and the fact that no one can really predict what the next Omicron is going to be.
Patrick Trucchio
analystRight. And so maybe just a question around cash and cash runway and kind of the ability to fund the Phase III and the potential launch.
David Hering
executiveYes. So we will provide updated guidance next week during earnings, but the last guidance we had was at the end of the year, we had $372 million of cash on hand. It's enough to fund the clinical trials that we have planned for COVID, all the way up and through to an EUA or equivalent ex U.S. And so we continue to monitor that. And what we've said is that would take us into the second half of 2024. And as we get more precision on the size of the studies and broader regulatory commitments, we can continue to update those numbers.
Patrick Trucchio
analystOkay. Any follow-up questions from the audience? Well, great. Thank you so much.
David Hering
executiveThank you for having me.
Patrick Trucchio
analystThanks, David. Thank you, Invivyd. Bye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Invivyd, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Invivyd, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.