Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (IOVA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
January 23, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorWelcome to the Iovance Biotherapeutics Special Update Conference Call. My name is Michelle, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Sara Pellegrino, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications at Iovance. Sara, please begin.
Sara Pellegrino
executiveThank you, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining our conference call to discuss recent corporate, clinical and regulatory updates. These updates were highlighted in a press release we issued earlier this morning, which can also be found on our corporate website at iovance.com. On today's call, Dr. Fred Vogt, our Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, will provide a brief introduction and summary about our acquisition of Proleukin, a recombinant human interleukin-2 product as well as our Phase III Confirmatory Study in Frontline Advanced Melanoma. Dr. Finckenstein, our Chief Medical Officer, will review the details for our frontline melanoma trial prior to highlighting new positive clinical data and our regulatory strategy in frontline advanced non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC. Dr. Jean-Marc Bellemin, our Chief Financial Officer, will also comment on our cash position and anticipated cash runway. Following the prepared remarks, we will hold a question-and-answer session. Several additional members of our executive leadership team are available to participate. Dr. Igor Bilinsky, our Chief Operating Officer; Dr. Raj Puri, our Executive Vice President, Regulatory Strategy and Translational Medicine; and Jim Ziegler, our Executive Vice President, Commercial. Before we start, I would like to remind everyone that statements made during this conference call will include forward-looking statements regarding Iovance's goals, business focus, business plans, pre-commercial activities, clinical trials and results, regulatory interactions, plans and strategies, research and preclinical activities, potential future applications of our technologies, manufacturing capabilities, regulatory feedback and guidance, payer interactions, licenses and collaborations, cash position and expense guidance and future updates. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, including the risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our SEC filings. Our results may differ materially from those projected during today's call. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. With that introduction, I will turn the call over to Fred.
Frederick Vogt
executiveThank you, Sara, and good morning, everyone. We are pleased to hold this call to review a series of corporate, clinical and regulatory updates that strengthen our mission to be the global leader in innovating, developing and delivering cell therapies for people with cancer. Today's call will highlight several key updates. First, we have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire worldwide rights to Proleukin, a human interleukin-2 or IL-2 product, for which we have a strong strategic fit and rationale. Next, we have alignment with the FDA on the Phase III TILVANCE-301 confirmatory trial in frontline advanced melanoma. As a result, we can provide additional detail on the study design, which we think is very favorable. As mentioned in the press release, we remain on track to complete our BLA submission and post-anti-PD-1 advanced melanoma this quarter, and we expect TILVANCE-301 to be well underway at the time of potential approval. We also reported new positive clinical data as well as our regulatory strategy in frontline advanced non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, and we look forward to discussing with FDA along with potential registration trial designed to take advantage of these results. Finally, the strength of our balance and sheet including proceeds from our ATM facility, we are well positioned to fund our operating plan into 2024. I'll begin today's discussion with the Proleukin transaction. As we prepare for our first potential approval and commercial launch, as we advance our pipeline in earlier treatment settings in larger clinical trials, we decided to enter into a strategic transaction with Clinigen to acquire worldwide rights to Proleukin and IL-2 product used to promote T-cell activity following TIL infusion. Benefits of this transaction are expected to include immediate and future revenue, security of the IL-2 supply chain and logistics surrounding TIL therapy administration, and lower cost of goods and clinical trial expenses for Proleukin used with TIL therapies. Terms of the agreement include an upfront payment of GBP 166.7 million, a GBP 41.7 million milestone payment upon first approval of lifileucel in advanced melanoma, and double-digit global sales royalties from Iovance to Clinigen. As Jean-Marc will highlight in further detail, this transaction will be financed with efficient cash, is expected to close in the first quarter of 2023, subject to required regulatory approvals and clearances and other customary closing conditions. Moving to our recent clinical and regulatory updates. I would also like to highlight our Phase III TILVANCE-301 confirmatory trial in frontline advanced melanoma. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we reached agreement with the FDA regarding the TILVANCE-301 trial design to support accelerated and full approvals of lifileucel in frontline advanced melanoma as well as a full approval of lifileucel in post-anti-PD-1 advanced melanoma. I will now ask Friedrich to further highlight details of the TILVANCE-301 trial design in our clinical and regulatory updates. Friedrich?
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveThank you, Fred. We are pleased to have reached agreement to be moving ahead with the FDA regarding the Phase III TILVANCE-301 trial of lifileucel in combination with pembrolizumab in frontline advanced melanoma. TILVANCE-301 will randomize 670 patients to investigate lifileucel in combination with pembrolizumab in the experimental arm in comparison with pembrolizumab monotherapy in the control arm. Notably, the FDA agreed to dual primary endpoints of objective response rate or ORR to support accelerated approval and progression free survival or PFS in TILVANCE-301 to support full approval of lifileucel in frontline advanced melanoma. TILVANCE-301 will also serve as a confirmatory trial to support full approval of lifileucel in post-anti-PD-1 advanced melanoma. We are confident in achieving our target enrollment and potentially enabling regulatory submissions in multiple geographies by including an appropriate number of global sites such as many large U.S. and European cancer centers as well as sites in numerous countries beyond the U.S. and Europe, where we expect strong enrollment. This trial is now starting up and is expected to be well underway at the time of potential BLA approval for lifileucel in post-anti-PD-1 advanced melanoma. We expect to provide further details on trial design later in 2023. We are confident in this design based on the latest data from Cohort 1A in the IOV-COM-202 trial of lifileucel in combination with pembrolizumab in frontline advanced melanoma, which remained consistent with previously reported robust ORR by RECIST 1.1 and durability of response. We look forward to sharing additional data from Cohort 1A and moving forward with our frontline melanoma strategy this year. Today, we also share top line initial data in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are not used to anti-PD-1 therapy from Cohort 3A of the IOV-COM-202 trial. We observed a confirmed ORR by RECIST 1.1 of 47% or 8 of 17 patients in Cohort 3A patients treated with the combination of TIL therapy and pembrolizumab. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 status and safety was consistent with other studies of Iovance TIL therapies in combination with pembrolizumab. Cohort 3A comprises three distinct clinical subsets of anti-PD-1 naïve metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the advanced setting: treatment-naïve, post chemotherapy and EGFR-mutant after prior treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or TKIs. The observed differences in ORR among patient subsets are informing the design of a subsequent potential registration study. For example, response rates were highest in treatment-naïve patients for whom we observed an 80% ORR in 4 out of 5 patients. And in post-chemotherapy patients, total we observed is 43% ORR in 3 out of 7 patients. In EGFR-mutant patients after prior treatment with TKI, ORR was 20% or 1 out of 5 patients. 2 patients in Cohort 3A achieved complete response and remain on study, which consists of 1 post-chemotherapy patients and 1 EGFR-mutant post-TKI patients. Study enrollment in Cohort 3A remains ongoing, and we plan to present details and updated results at the Medical Meeting this year. Based on initial Cohort 3A positive results, particularly within the treatment-naïve and post-chemotherapy subset, we plan to meet with FDA in 2023 to discuss data and the potential registration path for lifileucel in frontline advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. The proposed designs supporting this path will take advantage of the findings of Cohort 3A and explore TIL therapy combined with pembrolizumab administered after standard limited duration chemotherapy. Our goal is to offer frontline advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients improved responses and PFS compared with single agent maintenance pembrolizumab. In summary, we are excited about the opportunities for cell therapy as an earlier treatment in frontline advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. I am available to answer questions about our clinical updates during the Q&A session. And now I will pass the call to Jean-Marc. Jean-Marc?
Jean-Marc Bellemin
executiveThank you, Friedrich. I would like to provide additional details about our cash balance and runway. As Fred mentioned, we are financing the Proleukin acquisition with our existing cash. As of January 20, 2023, unaudited cash position was approximately $477 million, which includes approximately $227 million in net proceeds from an at-the-market equity financing facility raised during the fourth quarter of 2022 and early 2023. In addition, we agreed to terms for a secured line of credit of up to $100 million from Quogue Capital. These proceeds are expected to fund the acquisition of Proleukin and our operating plan well into 2024, including manufacturing and launch readiness activities, launch execution and pipeline advancement in our plan trials. With that, I will hand the call back to the operator to kick-off the Q&A session. Operator?
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Michael Yee with Jefferies.
Michael Yee
analystThank you for the update. Two questions, about both related. Can you give us maybe some color on what the gating steps are still left for the melanoma filing and what supports the confidence to complete that filing in Q1? And whatever you can say on that, would be helpful. And then secondly, I guess, can you give some color on the confirmatory timeline for the melanoma study? And maybe just, I know there has been discussion in the past with other companies about how that -- how much of that study actually needs to be completed, enrollment or substantially enrolled, et cetera. What have your conversations been with the FDA around that as it relates to the filing and an actual PDUFA date?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes. So the BLA remains on track. We intend to file the BLA, complete the rolling BLA submission in Q1. The activities that are going on right now include validation activities that we've discussed publicly previously, which are well underway, not to use the term there for the other part of this question too much, but they're underway right now and in good shape, and we think we're going to be able to complete the BLA submission on time. I can't really give you any more details. Most of it is heavy CMC-related work, but it's going well. On the confirmatory timeline and the real well underway the FDA said that we received very positive feedback from FDA at the meeting where we described the study to them on our timings. There was no discussion of any kind of percentage enrollment or anything like that. They thanked us and we're happy with the timings of the study. We had this many more terms last year, of course, we got a lot of feedback then. So they were comfortable with our timings, and so we think that's going to be supportive of our BLA approval.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Tyler Van Buren with Cowen.
Tyler Van Buren
analystGreat. I appreciate the question and nice to see all the updates. Two questions. The first one is, can you give us a sense on the outlook for Proleukin sales moving forward? And then the second one is related to the non-small cell lung update from Cohort 3A. Can you help us understand what duration of response looked like in the 2 subgroups that you're moving forward and especially as we think about the prior update at SEC 2021.
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes, sure, Tyler. On the Proleukin sales, we're not providing guidance right now on sales. What we -- at some point in the future as a commercial company, we'll be able to do things like that. What we can say is that it will contribute significantly, we think, to the overall sales for the company once lifileucel is approved, because it is a supporting part of the regimen and by capturing new sales, that is -- we think is going to be a very significant addition to the potential sales, potential of lifileucel in melanoma. On the durability of non-small cell lung, it's still early, but we are seeing durable responses. So we're very encouraged by this, and that's why we want to go talk to the FDA, and we'll provide more details on that at a medical meeting. Frederick can talk a little bit more as we go here, but do you see any updates, it's very encouraging in terms of response rate. And like I said, it is still early, but we're seeing durable responses and we're very positive. Operator, are there any additional questions?
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from James Shin with Wells Fargo. Our next question comes from Mark Breidenbach with OPCO.
Mark Breidenbach
analystCan you hear me all right?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes.
Mark Breidenbach
analystOkay. Great. Just a couple of quick ones for me. First of all, thanks for this update. Can you maybe briefly comment on the amount of COGS savings associated with the Proleukin's acquisition in terms of a rough percentage, that would be fantastic. And the second question is just are you planning to offer any updated guidance on the regulatory package cervical cancer in 2023? Or is it going to kind of focus on long this year?
Frederick Vogt
executiveSo Mark, just to be clear, on your first question, you want some idea of the potential savings for clinical trial usage of Proleukin?
Mark Breidenbach
analystCOGS. So with respect to lifileucel, so how much will the acquisition of Proleukin impact COGS for lifileucel?
Frederick Vogt
executiveSo lifileucel is a separate product. And while we -- it could impact COGS in some way, because we can use it during manufacturing as well. It's not -- it's sold separately as a separate transaction to the hospital. So it's not like -- I don't think it's like a direct effect on cause in that manner, although it can affect manufacturing and improve -- certainly would improve in that case. It's sold separately. What this gives us? It gives us control and security of the supply chain as well as revenue from the sales of Proleukin alongside of lifileucel, which we expect will act essentially like a relaunch of the Proleukin product. When lifileucel hits the market, Proleukin sales should increase much, much more than they ever have in the past, and we'll be able to capture some of that revenue because of this transaction. And then on your question regarding regulatory updates on cervical, hopefully, we can provide an update on that at some point this year. We did provide an update last year on that. When we noted that we were -- we had talked to FDA, and we were expanding enrollment in the study and intended the study to be pivotal. Right now, we're enrolling, and I don't have any updates for you today. But hopefully, we can say more about that at some point this year.
Operator
operatorPlease stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from James Shin with Wells Fargo.
James Shin
analystCan you guys hear me?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes. Sorry about that, James.
James Shin
analystNo, sorry, I think it's something on my end. Just had a question. Will this Proleukin deal have any impact on the Iovance's 3001 program? And given Proleukin only had, I think the label is RCC and melanoma on this label, will Iovance need to gain approval in the lifileucel's other indications?
Frederick Vogt
executiveNo. So no and no. We think we're going to continue to develop our own IL-2 asset because it's differentiated from this. However, this gives us an approved asset already, which is the -- as part of the treatment regimen today. This is the product we've been using as part of a treatment regimen all along for our studies, the new asset, the IOV-3001 asset will eventually be in that category, too, but it's obviously early in development. So this -- does that answer your question, James, or...
James Shin
analystYes. And then for the new indications, I guess, like what's the plan for that part?
Frederick Vogt
executiveWe're developing this as part of the treatment regimen for TIL therapy. The product is approved for melanoma and renal cell carcinoma in the United States and in a certain number of other jurisdictions. But those are minor indications. So really, what we're focused on is having lifileucel approved and the label for lifileucel will have treatment regimen includes this product with it.
James Shin
analystWe're not looking at...
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes, it's not like a classic label expansion. Although by acquiring the asset, it does give us some control over the label, so we can do some things on the label down a lot.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Peter Lawson with Barclays.
Peter Lawson
analystGreat. Just on the lung data, I guess, initially it's just -- if you could -- if you had any sense how responses looked in the different PD-1 expression levels?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes. And as I mentioned in the press release, Peter, we've seen responses in both PD-1 negative -- PD-L1 negative and PD-L1 positive. They're pretty evenly distributed. Friedrich, do you want to comment at all on this?
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveYes, I can -- I mean the data wise, Fred, you're absolutely right. We see responses in both groups, and that's important to know, right? Because the combination here is with pembrolizumab, and there's no chemotherapy involved. So I think that is interesting and important that we are seeing the responses -- meaningful responses in PD-L1 negative patients as well. So that's the basis and the starting point for our thoughts around how to now follow that at subsequent studies in the registrational strategy.
Peter Lawson
analystGot you. And the first CRs, were those in PD-1 high patients?
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveNot necessarily.
Peter Lawson
analystGot you. And then I wonder if you could just talk through the -- any kind of prior revenues that we're seeing for IL-2 saying 2022 or 2021 just to give us kind of a baseline?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes. I think it's been reported in Clinigen's financials. The product was primarily selling to 2 companies actually, although it sells small quantities around the world for the renal cell carcinoma. Jean-Marc, do you want to make a comment -- well, maybe I can just say, Peter, we can't provide guidance on this, but it was in the low double-digit million sales when they last were reporting their financials. Now they were acquired by a private equity firm, and they are -- so some of that stuff is no longer publicly visible, but that's what they were doing back then.
Peter Lawson
analystGot you. And would you still continue to sell it to other TIL companies?
Frederick Vogt
executiveSure. Yes. I mean we're not -- we'll continue to provide the asset to everybody. We're not trying to restrict anything here. Our big thing here is we're trying to capture the combined revenues of the two products, control over the products so that we can steer where we think it should best be suited. It goes hand-in-hand with lifileucel. So I think it's very important that we have ownership over it, and we can use it in the clinic. We can get a lot of savings by using it in the clinic, and are our own trials, including the TILVANCE-301 trial, for example, these can be quite significant to us.
Peter Lawson
analystAnd then final question, would you transfer manufacturing?
Frederick Vogt
executiveWe can. Right now, it's manufactured by a CMO, and you can do those sorts of things downstream. But we don't -- our facilities are designed for cell therapies. We don't have protein production facilities at Iovance. So that's not something that we -- is really on the radar for short term.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Ben Burnett with Stifel.
Benjamin Burnett
analystI just wanted to follow up on that last discussion. I guess did Clinigen have any agreements with other cell therapy companies? And I guess if so, are these agreements carrying over to you?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes, generally, Ben, that's the way a transaction just goes. They can have supply agreements with their companies. And when they sell the asset, those transferred to the buyer. So yes, although there's -- we're not -- a lot of them are small and we don't really share details of those things. But they did...
Benjamin Burnett
analystOkay. And I guess, mechanically, are there any like conflicts of interest, things need to be negotiated like if a potential competitor, cell-therapy competitor in oncology is using IL-2. How does that work?
Frederick Vogt
executiveJust like any supply drug for comparators or for usage as part of a treatment regimen or cell therapy you can supply that. Drug can supply these things all time, and that's what we would do, too. We're not looking at any way to restrict supply of the product.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Joe Catanzaro with PSC.
Joseph Catanzaro
analystMaybe two quick ones for me. Given the activity you're observing in Cohort 3A of COM-202 with the pembro combination, I guess, where is your thinking now for monotherapy activity or plan in a post PD-1 non-small cell lung cancer setting. And then with regards to Proleukin, I appreciate a lot of the potential benefits. But in terms of longer-term downstream revenues, can you remind us what sort of the current IP situation and the remaining period of exclusivity there is there?
Frederick Vogt
executiveSure. So on the first question, yes, post PD-1 non-small cell lung remains very important to us. We've got multiple studies running in that line, including our IOV-202 study, which could potentially be supportive of registration, and we've already put out the Cohort 3B data. We're showing a 21% response rate with some nice durable responses that we saw in those patients. You've seen all the data that's in our deck. That is very interesting to us and continues to be an extremely high priority for us. We think this data in Cohort 3A just adds to the overall equation and the proposition of TIL therapy and non-small cell lung. It shows that TIL therapy works in another line on also along in a promising manner that we think is worthy of significant investigation. And it's really a word of confidence and the fact that TIL therapies work in non-small cell lung. With respect to the IP position for Proleukin, it's an older product. It's been around for a long time. The traditional IP mechanisms like patents are no longer really relevant to the Proleukin franchise. However, there's tremendous men know-how. There's just natural entry barriers to come in with that product today. So we don't worry too much around the moat around that product. We think it's pretty secure.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Mara Goldstein with Mizuho Group.
Supawat Thongthip
analystThis is Supawat calling for Mara. You mentioned earlier in the call that with regard to the BLA submission that the company is in alignment with the FDA. I was wondering if you can add some specificity to that statements? Has there been alignment?
Frederick Vogt
executiveYes, we're in alignment with the FDA on the confirmatory study, TILVANCE-301 that we announced today, including that very favorable trial design, ORR, which is an interim endpoint, which dramatically improves our timeline for accelerated approval. FDA recommended ORR was highly supportive of this dual endpoint strategy here. So we think there's a tremendous amount alignment here between us and FDA on this study. And that we think is quite positive for us.
Supawat Thongthip
analystGot it. Got it. Okay. And I know you only just talk about NSCLC for a bit, but I'm just curious, so given the results that was just shared by the press release. Is it reasonable to assume that the frontline non-small cell lung cancer is now prioritized over the late-line treatment?
Frederick Vogt
executiveNo, not necessarily. We've already got IOV-202, potentially registrational study running in late-line lung and this is just adding another dimension. So the way to think about it is just like in melanoma, we're attacking lung from two different angles. And in fact, with one we're attacking it from a third angle too with the genetically modified TILs. But we are not -- this is not something that should make you think that somehow our late-line lung program is no longer a priority. It's extremely high priority. That's why we talked about it a little time. We have data out on that. We expect to have more data out on that in the future.
Supawat Thongthip
analystGot it. Got it. And if I may squeeze in one last question on cash. I'm just curious if there's any certain milestones that need to be met in order to access the $100 million credit from the Quogue Capital?
Frederick Vogt
executiveNo.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Asthika Goonewardene with Truist.
Asthika Goonewardene
analystIt's Asthika from Truist. First off, can I just ask the confirmatory study in melanoma, the 670 patients study. How well do you think it will take to recruit that? And then I got a couple of follow ups.
Frederick Vogt
executiveWe feel still to recruit quite quickly. We're going to -- and maybe Friedrich can add a little bit of color here after I go. We're going to really extend the scope of this study very widely across the world, and we intend to have a lot of sites active. It's going to be quite a significant number of sites potentially in the triple digits. So we are very interested in making sure enrollments fast and taking advantage of the fact that we've got ORR as an endpoint here, which really speeds up our timeline for accelerated approval. Friedrich, do you want to add anything?
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveNo, that's right. We're going to go aggressively after this, obviously, open an appropriate number of sites in geographies that we think makes sense. As we shared, we can do this in geographies that go beyond the U.S. and Europe, and that's important to keep in mind as well. So we're pretty confident that we can get this up and run on pretty quickly.
Asthika Goonewardene
analystGot it. Okay. Then if I just a bit to non-small cell lung cancer. And the data that you present announced today, ORR is certainly really attractive. But I'm wondering, in this naïve population, the PD-1 naïve population, the chemo-experienced PD-1 naïve population, what kind of durability would be attractive to you?
Frederick Vogt
executiveFriedrich, do you want to answer that?
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveYes. I think, Yes, I'm here. Can you guys hear me? I think there's benchmarks out there, right? So I think one of the things that we need to think about is what do you see with the standard of care. But keep in mind what we just also disclosed is the approach here in further developing as may not necessarily be an approach where we are going against benchmarks, existing benchmarks with standard of care chemo plus pembro, which now, as you know, is pretty widely used, but finding a way of actually adding on to that. So it's not so much of keeping benchmarks here, but it's about adding on to that.
Asthika Goonewardene
analystSo would that also mean that maybe you look at specific patient subpopulations like a PD-L1 negative patients might also be a viable part to update here.
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein
executiveYes. And that is very consistent with what we are seeing in melanoma number where we do not see any dependence on correlation with PD-L1 expression that makes sense, because we believe that cell therapy is differentiated from PD-1 to pembrolizumab in that regard.
Asthika Goonewardene
analystGot it. This is very helpful.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Kelsey Goodwin with Guggenheim Partners.
Kelsey Goodwin
analystThanks for providing the updates today. Just a couple of quick questions from me. I guess, first, how important is the core biopsy to your overall non-small cell lung cancer strategy? And then how should we think about lifileucel versus 4001 and how they kind of fit into your non-small cell lung cancer strategy? And then last one, just kind of quickly on the modeling of Proleukin. I guess, can you provide any color or guidance on what the price per TIL administration has been historically? Or how we should kind of think about that going forward?
Frederick Vogt
executiveSure. All right. So core biopsy, we have a Cohort 1 and IOV-202 call Cohort 3, which is exploring core biopsy, and we've been a leader in that space for a long time. It's a very interesting technology. It's early stage. We're very -- we think it's very promising. We are very encouraged with that approach, but it's not no pun intended. It's not core to our non-small cell lung strategy or a non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC strategy right now is running quite well because no biopsies. But if we can get core biopsies add to that, obviously, we think that would be an additional expansion of the applicability of TIL therapy to some other hard-to-treat patients. Lifileucel versus 4001 and LM45 versus 4001, the way we think about these things is 4001 is potentially a product with potentially increased potency and efficacy because of its incorporation of a PD-1 knockout, because we're able to do these few knockouts of checkpoint genes like PD-1 and CD4 and TIGIT and others. We think this is a potentially very powerful strategy because of mix an antibody combination with the TIL potentially, whereas lifileucel, of course, carries its own efficacy, too. So TIL themselves are -- you can think of a TIL PD-1 knockout is like a single product that's really embodies a combination product. So we're very excited about that technology and the ability to boost responses with that. And then finally, for the model for Proleukin, Proleukin's current list price is around $5,000 a vial. This is something you can find publicly. With TIL administration, we typically give about 16 vials. The actual -- the target is 18 vials but in most cases, we give around 16 on average. And from that, I think you can understand exactly how much Proleukin might be sold with the TIL infusion.
Operator
operatorAt this time, I show no further questions. I would now like to turn the conference back to Fred for closing remarks.
Frederick Vogt
executiveOkay. Thank you again for joining the Iovance corporate, regulatory and clinical update call today. Please feel free to reach out to our Investor Relations team with any follow-up questions. Thanks, everyone.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.