Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 14, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
David Lebowitz
analystGood morning. I'm David Lebowitz, one of the biotechnology analysts at Morgan Stanley. Before I get started, I have to go through the requisite disclosures. Please note that this webcast is for Morgan Stanley's clients and appropriate Morgan Stanley employees only. This webcast is not for members of the press. If you are a member of the press, please disconnect and reach out separately. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. I'd like to welcome you all this morning to the Morgan Stanley 18th Annual Global Healthcare Conference. In this session, I have with us from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, CEO, Mark Mallon; and President, Tom McCourt. This is a company that's been around for a while. They are -- they sell a drug called LINZESS for the treatment of constipation. And I guess before we really dig in overall, if you could just run us through the evolution of Ironwood over the last few years. Clearly, this is a company that's gone through a lot of changes recently and tell us how it plays into the company's mission.
Mark Mallon
executiveDavid, thanks very much. First, thanks to you and to Morgan Stanley for hosting us. We really appreciate the opportunity to reach out virtually this year and tell the story of Ironwood. So happy to just give a quick intro for everyone. As a reminder, so Ironwood, as you said, has been around for 20-plus years. Started as an innovative company, had the success in developing linaclotide and -- which became LINZESS. In April of last year, we made -- went through a strategic change, spinning off our research group into Cyclerion, focusing on rare and more severe disease and became a GI-focused company, really aiming to be the leader in GI health care. We had 3 key priorities, basically maximizing LINZESS, which I'm sure, we'll talk quite a bit about in the next few minutes, really developing our late-stage pipeline, which we will also talk about. Right now we're in the middle of delivering on our refractory GERD program for 3718. And then on delivering profitability. We said that we would basically generate profit from day 1, and we've been able to do that with 5 consecutive quarters of profitability. I think we've executed on all three of these priorities. We're having, I think, great progress. And I think, David, with that intro, love to get into your specific questions.
David Lebowitz
analystSure. I guess one question I have before we really start digging into LINZESS is the product LINZESS has always been a part of a 50-50 partnership with Allergan. And certainly, Allergan has undergone some changes over the last few months. Can you tell us how AbbVie coming on board and buying Allergan has affected the partnership for you?
Mark Mallon
executiveSure, David. Thanks. The transition to AbbVie has gone very smoothly. I mean, of course, Allergan has been a great partner over the years, but AbbVie has been very enthusiastic about LINZESS. It contributes to a key objective that they had for the transaction, which is to grow sales and profits, and we contribute in both ways. The -- operationally, collaboration has remained strong. All the decision-making committees have been in place. Where we needed to have new members on board, they are. And they're really showing, I think, a lot of enthusiasm in bringing, I think, additional capabilities even beyond what Allergan in things like helping us with what we -- expanding our reach in consumer, they've got a lot of experience on patient support programs. And so we're basically kind of with them collaboratively, thinking about how we can really maximize the full capabilities of AbbVie. So it's been a very positive transition so far.
David Lebowitz
analystSounds good. I guess, whenever there is some sort of M&A activity like this, people always wonder if there is a consideration by the acquirer to decide to spin off some products and whatnot. I guess you don't really get a sense on AbbVie in that regard.
Mark Mallon
executiveSo yes, I mean, you'd have to talk to AbbVie, as a standard response to that is about their plans. What I can say is, they're very excited about LINZESS. They continue to support investments, and I think we're looking forward to working with them. All signs have been -- has been positive.
David Lebowitz
analystExcellent. So let's dig into LINZESS. Clearly, this is a market that's been around for a while. And in a lot of ways, LINZESS has come on. It's grown to being the #1 therapy in the space. Can you tell us about how the dynamics of this space have changed since launch and how they are right now?
Mark Mallon
executiveSure. Let me turn it over to Tom. Go ahead.
Thomas McCourt
executiveThanks, Mark. Sorry. And thanks, David. Thanks for the opportunity. This -- as you know, this has been a wonderful adventure for us. And I think it's both -- the market has shifted some, but also our position in the market is shifting. Initially, we came into the market, we wanted to be a highly differentiated drug. So we're really focused on IBS-C and really positioned LINZESS as an abdominal pain drug that also treated constipation, not the other way around. And clearly, those are the patients that the doctors were willing to give us because they're the most problematic patients. And really, that was our beachhead to start. And as we've continued to broaden our prescriber base, we were also focusing on establishing this dialogue between patient and doctor around the symptoms so that they could equate that abdominal pain and constipation drug directly to LINZESS. And that really fueled the growth. And then as we secured fairly broad payer access to the point where we have over 80% unrestricted access across commercial and Med D, we were well positioned then to ignite really the consumer advertising campaign, which, as you know, has been an industry-recognized performance as far as a best-in-class consumer campaign that we've continued to evolve from a very functional abdominal symptom ad to frustration, to a game frame where you could actually claim success with this just LINZESS campaign, which has been highly successful and very motivating to patients. And once we established -- or we're certainly on track to be the market leader, then the focus really needed to be on how do we grow and capture the market at the same time. And in order to do that, we needed to start broadening physician's view for who the appropriate patient was. So we're -- we were really limited about how we could describe the patient around the label of abdominal pain. As you know, we conducted the study to broaden that view to include bloating and discomfort, which we've started to implement since we've had positive clinical trials, we've submitted an sNDA to the FDA, and we're seeing nice results. So we're identifying new pools of patients, patients that we're able to capture in a very, very, large business. Now the things that have changed, I think, over the past couple of years is, one, certainly, we had 3 competitors that came into the market and provided some pricing pressure that we were able to manage well. When you think about it, all 3 of these competitors now have been out for a while, and the combined market share is less than 5%. So I think it really speaks to the strength of the clinical profile of LINZESS, the comfort, the access, and certainly, where -- how we're continuing to evolve and strengthen the clinical profile and broaden the clinical utility of the drug. And I think we're probably going to talk a bit more specifically about COVID in a second, but the other dramatic change that we're seeing is this consolidation of GI practices into these GI supergroups. And we've got now GI practices that have 300, 400 physicians in them. And we've deployed a special role that's working together with these large GI networks to make sure that we're well positioned, the brand is well positioned and how do we more effectively communicate with our most valued customer and their referral base. And I think that's going to continue to evolve. I think the other big advancement or change is telemedicine, particularly in GI. GI was kind of late into the game as far as adopting, but when COVID came and they couldn't do colonoscopy anymore, this became a tremendous channel for them to be able to manage their patients remotely, and they've really embraced it. And Ironwood's got very involved in understanding and leveraging this to our advantage. At one point during COVID, about 1/3 of our business was coming directly out of telemedicine. And it's -- while we're kind of moving at least into the direction of getting back to normal, we're still seeing a significant use of telemedicine, which I think is going to be here for a while. And so we want -- as an organization, we wanted to be able to adapt to the marketplace and take advantage of these channels, particularly with LINZESS, where you have a functional GI disease that's not necessarily seen as life-threatening, but very problematic to patients. You have a treatment that's highly effective with very high patient satisfaction and coverage and can be easily diagnosed and managed over the phone. So this is a natural for this channel, and we're going to continue to nurture that as we move forward and expand the utility of the drug. So we really like where we're at, and we like where the market is going right now.
David Lebowitz
analystWith that in mind, you said at one point, about 1/3 of the new business is coming from telemedicine. Are these patients, patients that have already had colonoscopies and might be getting moved from some other therapy? Or are these -- are doctors foregoing colonoscopies and prescribing LINZESS to patients?
Thomas McCourt
executiveI mean, the majority of these, David-- majority of these patients don't really require colonoscopy unless they have a clear red flag, such as rectal bleeding or weight loss or very severe lower abdominal pain. So the far majority of these patients that don't require colonoscopy, in those patients, they can easily manage. So these are largely patients who are struggling with their symptoms. They've tried multiple OTCs, and they're still experiencing abdominal symptoms with constipation, and the doctor can move quickly to diagnose and treat.
David Lebowitz
analystSo you had mentioned earlier about abdominal pain, and I know there's an SND underway -- sNDA underway. To what extent are you able to discuss the abdominal pain trials with physicians and use the information? And what do you have to wait to be able to have it on label for?
Thomas McCourt
executiveSure. So this is all within label. These are additional claims within the IBS-C indications. So it's really -- it's never been about off-label. And when you look at OPDP guidance, it's really about, do you have substantial evidence to support your claim within an indication. So once we got these data, we could start sharing it first with the prescriber. And I think -- and we've kind of introduced it in some of our DTC. It is the problem to be solved. But as we secure final approval and final labeling, it gives us a clear guidance with regard to where we can go next, particularly with the consumer. But I think the physicians accepted it, recognized it. And I think it's why we're seeing this ongoing growth that we continue to see 9%, 10% demand growth year-on-year.
David Lebowitz
analystThat's helpful. So how has COVID-19 impacted things at this point?
Thomas McCourt
executiveI mean, it's been remarkable, David. I mean you know what's going on with the rest of the market. I mean it's down. LINZESS is up. And I think there's -- again, a couple of reasons for this. One, these are highly symptomatic diseases. They can reach out and contact their doctor remotely to get prescription -- to get a prescription. And I think this whole -- again, this whole -- the opportunity of telemedicine has really helped us. And as you know, this is a very, very large market. And I do think as we continue to push on the consumer side, it's also increasing demand. So I think it speaks to the resilience of the drug in this category and really the strength of the market leadership that we have.
David Lebowitz
analystGrowth has definitely maintained. Has there been -- I guess, what types of disruptions have you seen?
Thomas McCourt
executiveWell, certainly, personal promotion. We brought down the sales force or paused the sales force for a period of time to make sure that we could safely reengage physicians' offices, and we've done that over time. And we've continued to push on the consumer side so we could certainly help patients help themselves. And over time now the physicians are reengaging us. We -- as you know, we have a very experienced, very talented sales force who know how to get into physicians' offices and deliver a message, and they've been highly resourceful. And even when we were remote, we did use some virtual technology to stay engaged with the physicians' offices through lunch programs or direct Zoom conferences with the offices. So the sales force kept quite active, particularly in the key accounts. And right now, we're almost fully engaged. We're getting to the majority of our really critical customers, and we're seeing -- continue to see really nice growth in response. In fact, where the areas we're seeing the greatest growth is in those territories where we can get the patient -- or excuse me, the rep in the office sooner.
David Lebowitz
analystThat makes sense. I guess there's certainly the disruptions with the lack of the inability to visit patients for a time, which definitely sounds like it's improving. What about the unemployment situation?
Thomas McCourt
executiveYes. I mean that -- as you know, we've guided to that. We're having a very strong year. Demand growth is good. Price has been very stable. The one kind of wildcard is what happens as we continue to see unemployment in Medicaid. And we've been watching this very, very closely. We haven't seen a dramatic shift yet, but it is something that we have to pay attention to and, if it happens, prepare for, which could affect our price to some extent. But so far, it's been remarkably stable. But as you know, some of this can be delayed as the claims come through. So we're cautiously optimistic towards the back end of the year coming off a very, very strong first couple of quarters.
David Lebowitz
analystI guess, has -- I mean, from what you've been able to ascertain, how have your competitors been able to handle the current environment?
Thomas McCourt
executiveI mean when I look at -- when you look at the data, the rest of the market is losing share. We're gaining share. And again, I think it has a lot to do with both the clinic -- the overall clinical performance of the drug, certainly, the payer access and the ease to use the drug, but also the flexibility of dosing. And so I think we're in a very strong position. When I look at the emerging competitors, they're really undifferentiated, in many cases, do not perform as well clinically. And I think we're going to continue to push that forward to continue to grow the market and capture a disproportionate share of the business.
David Lebowitz
analystSo I guess, you gave a mid- to high single-digit growth for LINZESS earlier in the year that should, I guess, remain on track?
Mark Mallon
executiveYes. Let me jump in...
Thomas McCourt
executiveMark, do you want to take that?
Mark Mallon
executiveYes. Thanks, Tom. Yes. So yes, we had given that at the beginning of the year. We went through it as we were -- in the first quarter as we were trying to understand the effects of COVID, but then based on what we saw, we reinstated it, as you highlighted. So we're guiding to mid-single-digit growth, and we're confident and comfortable with that continuing. Of course, our volume growth has been very strong in the first half of the year, as Tom highlighted, 11% in the first quarter, 9% in the second quarter. And price has been stable, certainly, within the range that we had guided, plus or minus a couple of percent. We have gotten a couple of questions saying, could we be -- could we do better than the mid-single-digit growth. As Tom highlighted, we want to stay a little bit cautious because we still have 4 months to go. There's been a huge disruption in the economy, specifically with people unemployed. We want to see how that continues to play out. And so right now, we think that's the appropriate stance, but we feel very good about our ability to deliver on that mid- single-digit growth based on the strong volume performance and our strong payer position in the marketplace behind LINZESS. And just the overall execution of the team and the fact that the sales team, as Tom has highlighted, is largely back out.
David Lebowitz
analystSo has there been any changes in how, I guess, agreements are negotiated, given the current environment?
Mark Mallon
executiveSo we -- as you know, the lead time for contracts' [ come time ] is going to be well -- particularly in the Medicare Part D, can be as much as to 18 months. So many of our contracts have been stable and in place. Every year, you do have changes in the payer base, mergers or other types of changes. We're definitely not seeing the kind of pressure that we had seen in '17, '18 and '19 on that. I think that's, again, due to the really strong position that LINZESS has. We had some competitive entrants that did put pressure on the price, but that has basically been stabilized. We've also been able to be more selective. So in a couple of cases where we felt like the value the plan was offering in exchange for the discount required wasn't worth it, and so we made a couple of choices to let that go. And I think that's worked well. It's been part of why the pricing has stabilized, and our competitor -- the competitors are not really impacting our growth. So certainly, for the rest of this year, we feel really good about the guidance we've given around pricing, and we also -- we maintain more than 80% unrestricted access for the brand across the both commercial and Medicare Part D. So we're in a good position. As we head in -- we have guided for '21 and beyond. It's going to be a challenging -- continued challenging health care environment. So I don't expect price pressure to go away entirely, but for this year, we think we've done a really good job of managing it, and it looks stable, and our position in the plans looks stable.
David Lebowitz
analystSo let's jump over to GERD, IW-3718. I guess before we get into the clinical trial adjustments and where that's going, can you just talk about what the molecule is and what it does versus traditional PPIs people are used to?
Thomas McCourt
executiveSure. And I think for -- I think it probably is important to start with what's the problem we're trying to solve in these patients, right? So what we're talking about is people that have chronic GERD that have been on a PPI but continue to have heartburn and regurgitation. And of course, Mark and I know the space quite well. And obviously, the PPIs were a huge advancement in certainly reducing acid exposure and improving heartburn. But the problem is people still reflux. And often, these patients that have bile refluxing into the stomach are refluxing bile acids into the esophagus, which is irritating the esophagus and causing heartburn. The other piece that we have discovered, David, is bile also is changing the dynamics of reflux. So what we know is bile acid will delay stomach emptying and will also lower the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, which can exacerbate the episode, either the height, the volume. And this is where regurgitation becomes a real problem where PPIs really can't help these people. So what we've designed is a bile -- a gastroretentive bile acid sequestering agent. We use colesevelam, which has obviously been out for a number of years. It is safe. And we're delivering it in a gastroretentive formulation, which basically sits in the stomach and ties up the bile. So it reduces the exposure of bile into the esophagus. And what we certainly saw in our Phase II data is an improvement in heartburn as well as regurgitation, which we've never seen before. And I think it clearly -- I mean heartburn relief is what's probably -- what's going to get the drug approved, but regurgitation is going to be a key differentiator for the brand as we move forward. .
David Lebowitz
analystSo the Phase II program is going to have an interim analysis coming up later this year. There was a recent adjustment in the primary endpoint. Could you run us through, I guess, what the decision-making process was going into that protocol change and then the changing of the endpoint? And I guess then after that, we can talk about what to expect on timing?
Thomas McCourt
executiveSure. As you know, these are -- we have 2 identical clinical trials running, 301 and 302. First, on the endpoint, and this was an ongoing discussion with the FDA. Traditionally, there's a division like responder endpoints, which really is a threshold of response at a time point. And the struggle is, is that the best way to evaluate a drug's performance? And FDA clearly has been moving towards this continuous variable of change from baseline as far as looking at improvement over different data points and different time points, which is a much better and more comprehensive assessment of the clinical performance of the drug. And it's also easier to communicate to health care professionals as opposed to, well, why did you pick 45% reduction in heartburn, as opposed to, this is the magnitude of benefit over placebo over time or over different data cuts. So we felt very good that this was a good move. As we looked at the Phase II data, the data certainly supported it. The data is very robust. The trials are very well powered. So we thought it was, again, aligned with FDA guidance. I think -- from a commercial perspective, I think it will -- we'll benefit from our ability to communicate the benefits of the drug. And I think, again, based on the Phase II data, we have a high probability of success. So I think that's where we ended up. And I think the FDA was terrific. The second change that we made was this interim analysis that you had mentioned. And as I mentioned, we have 2 trials: 301 and 302. 302 is enrolling very rapidly. And with the guidance that the FDA has given in the COVID environment, we felt that we had enough data to take a look at the results of 1 study to really inform where we go moving forward. So we decided to do this interim analysis with this independent data monitoring group...
Mark Mallon
executiveTom, can I just -- just to clarify a point -- I know you know this, but just to, I think, clarify. This isn't an interim analysis because, actually, we're entering the -- ending the study -- 302 study had stopped. So the high enrollment, which you talked about, was an opportunity because we had the sufficient power to stop it and then get information to help inform the decision. So sorry...
Thomas McCourt
executiveYes, it was -- that's absolutely true, Mark. We worked with the FDA because we knew it was adequately powered. We stopped 302, and this group is going to look at the data, and we've established some baseline predetermined criteria that we want to be able to pass that really increases our probability of success. And it gives us an early read on where we are. And what will happen is, based on that criteria, this independent group will look at it and provide their feedback to us and, obviously, if it's all go, we'll continue with 301, and we'll expect to see the entire data set in the first quarter -- first half of next year. In addition, if it doesn't hit the prespecified criteria, we'll take a look at the data and see how viable the data is as far as what our path is forward. So again, this is kind of a real opportunity for us to gain greater confidence and give us greater time to really determine what the best thing is to do for the brand.
David Lebowitz
analystSo I mean, I guess, when investors hear the difference of the move in primary endpoint, naturally, they always get a little nervous. They try to understand -- they try to -- then they try to ascertain which is easier to hit. I guess are -- do you consider one easier to hit? Or are they really both the same and maybe the -- because it's a continuous endpoint, it's just got less room for error?
Thomas McCourt
executiveI think you're going down the right track. To say one is easier to hit than the other, we need to have a magnitude of benefit that's meaningful to patients and docs, which both can do, but the continuous variable, it just gives you a much better view of the overall performance of the drug. And again, I think it's the right way to evaluate the clinical performance of the drug. I think FDA is really on the right track here to encourage these type of analysis as opposed to the more traditional responder endpoint. And we have great confidence in the data. I mean we wouldn't have made this decision if we weren't confident based on the Phase II data that we would be able to -- to be able to secure that -- to achieve that endpoint. The other piece of this, David, is, also, it also allowed us to change the hierarchy of endpoints, and we were able to eliminate an endpoint that really increased the predominance of -- prominence of the regurgitation endpoint, which I think could be very, very meaningful to the brand. So again, when I look at kind of all the upsides versus the risk, I mean, clearly, this was the right move for us and, certainly, FDA supported us on it.
David Lebowitz
analystSo from a marketing perspective, do you see the regurgitation as being even the grander differentiator?
Thomas McCourt
executiveI mean both is important. I mean GERD has traditionally been defined as heartburn relief. But everybody recognizes, for many of these patients, regurgitation is really a bigger problem, particularly nocturnal regurgitation, where it wakes people up at night. It's a very, very uncomfortable thing to experience. And these patients -- 75% of these patients in the clinical trial have experienced regurgitation 2 or more times a week, many as many as 4 or 5 times a week. And that's really uncomfortable. And for us to be able to reduce that by 40% to 50% would be a huge improvement in care for a fairly large population of patients.
Mark Mallon
executiveYes. I just want to echo that, David, that the important thing to remember here, too, is we're talking about 8 million to 10 million patients that are suffering from refractory GERD, as Tom, I think, highlighted, and we've continuously highlighted. And this medicine, potential medicine, 3718, would be the first new sort of medical therapy in more than 30 years actually since the launch of PPIs. So it really is an opportunity to make a big difference with these patients. The scale of the opportunity is in line with what LINZESS has. And so when you think about Ironwood, we have a product like LINZESS, as Tom described, really firing on all cylinders, strong growth, underlying volume growth, dominant position, access, a great profile, new data coming out and a long runway with IP out to '29 as a great sort of base platform for the company. And then you add this catalyst of a potentially, really exciting for treating a very large market with 3718 in refractory GERD. I think it puts us in a great position. And of course, the company has been executing great since we've done the spin-off. We've had 5 consecutive quarters of profitability. I think you saw in the end of the second quarter, our cash was up to close to $250 million. We generated more profit and cash in the second quarter than we did a year ago. So we're growing sales, we're growing profit, and we've got a great new medicine -- hopefully, new medicine if the study is positive to make a big difference for a large group of patients. .
David Lebowitz
analystExcellent. And thank you all for attending the session. We've reached our ending. Have a good conference. Bye-bye.
Thomas McCourt
executiveThanks, David.
Mark Mallon
executiveThanks. Bye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.