Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 29, 2020

NASDAQ US Consumer Staples Beverages special 59 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#1

Hi. Good morning, everyone. I'm Dara Mohsenian, Morgan Stanley's beverage, household products and food analyst. And on behalf of Bryan Spillane, Bank of America's food, beverage, tobacco and cannabis analyst, we would like to welcome Keurig Dr Pepper's management team for joining us for a discussion as part of a series of in-depth video discussions we are having with C-suite management teams and additional executives across the Staples Group. It's a joint effort between Morgan Stanley and Bank of America. Before we begin, we have a quick disclaimer. This call is from Morgan Stanley and Bank of America's institutional client base. This call is not for members of the press. If you're a member of the press, please disconnect. And some of the statements Keurig Dr Pepper will make may be considered forward-looking and are based on assumptions as of today, and Keurig Dr Pepper undertakes no obligation to update them. Please refer to KDP's Form 10-K for a discussion of the risk factors that may affect results and Morgan Stanley and Bank of America's websites for important research disclosures.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#2

Hey. Thanks, Dara. I'm Bryan Spillane, and we're happy this morning to introduce Keurig Dr Pepper's CEO, Bob Gamgort; and CFO, Ozan Dokmecioglu. The format of the call will be Q&A from Dara and myself. But if you have any questions during any point during the call, please e-mail either of us. It's bryan.spillane@bofa.com or dara.mohsenian@morganstanley.com. This call is going to run for 60 minutes. And Dara, I'm going to turn it over to you to start us off with Q&A.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#3

Great. Thanks, Bryan, and thanks for joining us, guys. We appreciate the time. So perhaps we can start with maybe some of the near-term COVID-related dynamics on your business, starting with the coffee business. Can you help us understand or quantify the benefits you've realized since COVID began on the coffee side, both in terms of increased household penetration for your brewers as well as the benefit you've seen in attachment rates? And, more importantly, I guess, as we look going forward, as you think about how sustainable these gains are beyond 2020, I would assume it's reasonable to think household penetration has picked up in brewers in this environment, but is that more stealing future opportunity in your mind? Or is that something that's upside? And on the attachment rate side, how much risk is there that things just sort of fall off as the economy reopens from here?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#4

Sure. So first of all, good morning, Dara and Bryan. Thank you for hosting us, and good morning to everyone who's joining us today. Happy to talk to you through the coffee business, which we're receiving a lot of questions on, what is the COVID impact on coffee. And I can understand where they're coming from, and I'd be happy to provide some context to it. I always am consistent in saying that any short-term conversation needs to be put in the context of the longer-term trends and strategy because this is a really solid and predictable business. And the more we break it down in the short-term, I think it's actually less valuable. But COVID is unique, so let me talk more about that. You can go all the way back to when we talked about the combination of the 2 companies in our Investor Day in March of 2018, and that's 2.5 years old, but I -- we still reference that deck and refer investors back to our website to look at that deck because everything that we talked about the coffee business at that time is still relevant today. And so let me just refresh what are the key things, and then I'll talk to you about COVID. Key things are household penetration is the single biggest driver of our coffee system growth. It's the key metric to focus on for the long-term health of this business. We last updated that, because we only do it once a year, in Q4 -- on our Q4 call. So it's about 9 months old, but the number was 30 million American households. And if you look at that 30 million American household penetration number and you compare it to 2015, which is when KGM was taken private, that's an increase of over 40%. It's about a 9% compound annual growth range. And there are very few if any CPG companies that can talk about that level of real growth. But we also talked back in 2018 about our belief that we could grow beyond 50% household penetration. And that's very much intact, and we have a lot of confidence in that. So one of the other questions we get is, well, how much runway do you have in front of you? Well, if you look at our growth rates and you look at that 50% number, you have at least 10 years of strong growth in front of us before we have a conversation about what next. So that's why we don't spend a lot of time talking about that because, again, there are very few companies that have line of sight to that kind of growth. So with all of the long-term factors in place, COVID is unique. But what I will tell you right upfront before I get into the details is with all the pluses and minuses of COVID that I'll take you through, that long-term outlook and the way that we run our business is very much intact because we don't see this as a pandemic-driven business. It was doing really well before. It's delivering really well during the crisis. And whatever the new normal is, we have enough flexibility to manage it to success. But there are 4 factors that we ought to talk about in the context of COVID and how it fits into the long-term strategy. And you mentioned one of them, first, and that's the attachment rate. Attachment rate, just to make sure everyone knows, is the number of cups per brewer that's installed. And we usually don't talk about attachment rate because it's been absolutely steady for years. That's the good news of it. When a new household comes in, the attachment rate stays intact. But it's been also -- it's not a number that we saw as a big growth driver. Well, not surprisingly, the attachment jumped fairly significantly in the early days of the pandemic. What have we seen since then is you see a direct correlation with consumer mobility. So as consumers have become more mobile, and I know you talk about that all the time, that attachment rate has come down from its peak, call it, the March-April timeframe, but it still remains elevated. And honestly, where it goes from here is completely dependent upon the trajectory of the virus and how people think about their work situation going forward. Our base assumption is that the attachment levels will settle, but they'll settle at a slightly elevated rate in this new normal given a combination of things about work from home and how people now view value and the fact that this is a much greater value than going out. The good news is, we talked about it before, we've got this connected panel of brewers, smart brewers that give us point of consumption data. So attachment rate is something that we can literally manage -- not manage, measure hour to hour, if we wish. So it's something that we have a good grip on. Second metric is another one we never talk about, but worth referring to here, and that's the brewer upgrade cycle. So that's existing Keurig households upgrading their machine. Well, during COVID, we've seen an uptick in consumer upgrades. And it makes sense because, one, people are staying at home and they value their brewer much more. The other element is, for years, the company gave consumers no reason to upgrade. Now with our innovation pipeline and all the new brewers in terms of quality and the benefits, we've given people a reason to upgrade. So you have to think about the Keurig business very much like it's an annuity, and it's very similar to a subscription business. So every household that recommits is a really bullish indicator for the long term. But again, it doesn't provide an immediate increase in pod sales, but we're really happy to see people upgrading their machines at a higher rate. So then I get to the third metric, which is the one that I keep saying is the most important, which is household penetration. So no question, household penetration has accelerated during the crisis. But I want everyone to view this as an incremental boost to the long-term trends, not a transformational increase of short-term nature. And the reason why it's -- I put it in that category, it's pretty easy to understand if you analyze consumer behavior. Most consumers wait for their current brewer to break before they get a new one. So when the pandemic hit, clearly, at-home coffee consumption went up, but the majority of that was satisfied by the brewer already in the home. But what we see is as consumers replace their brewers, Keurig is getting a disproportionate share of those replacements. So like in the -- if you look at NPD data, which is available to everybody, if you look at the latest period, Keurig machines are growing at 17%, drip coffee makers are growing at 5%. And so there's clearly an attraction to at-home coffee, and we're getting a disproportionate share of that. But you have to remember, we have this incredibly strong and large household base that's already installed. So even that level of change is a modest increase to a household penetration in any given year. And that's why we keep saying it's interesting, but look at the long-term trajectory. That 9% compound growth over 4 years with continued strength is what you should be focused on and not overly focus on the short-term. And the last piece I would talk about is one that again that we rarely talk about is our away-from-home business. And that's primarily office coffee. And you don't have a lot of external visibility to that, and it has been just a really solid profitable performer within the portfolio that's moved along with the Keurig system's growth levels. And therefore, we haven't talked a lot about it. But let's be clear, there's a big gain in at-home coffee consumption. There's a big hit in office coffee. Office traffic has been one of the hardest hit of all mobility measurements in the pandemic. And if you look at it, it's persistently negative. So even as mobility has started to increase, and we're seeing restaurants recovering somewhat, and you see mobility at retail increasing, people have not come back to offices. So we've got these strong at-home trends, but there's been a significant offset to that, which is our away-from-home business. And if you think about how this all converges, in Q3 is when we're going to see the peak impact of the office on our coffee systems results. And then when you get beyond that, what are we seeing? We're seeing -- already in the latest IRi data, you're seeing changing seasons in the start of school, you're seeing an uptick in at-home coffee consumption again. And you're seeing some offices returning workers and talk about returning them at a faster rate. So it's the balance of the strong at-home offset by a negative away-from-home hits us to the most to the negative in Q3, and then it starts rebounding again. And then remember, we think going forward, as offices reopen, we actually have the ability to increase our share in that space because single-serve coffee has become a much more attractive format in this new normal, and we have the default single-serve system. So that's really what I want to talk about in terms of COVID. Those -- all of the things I just discussed all factored in the guidance that we've given for the balance of the year. The timing gets a little uneven, as I point out in Q3, and Q2 was a different situation. But what I would suggest whenever you look at any Keurig quarterly data, look at our conversations on these earnings calls over the past 8 quarters. We've been just as quick when we've had spectacular results to say, look at the long-term. As we've said when there's been results that have been below expectations look at the long-term, I would say the exact same thing here. And the takeaway is not that this is a COVID business or a pandemic-benefiting business. This is a really unique long-term growth play that has incredible line of sight to the future that has passed the COVID test. And that we believe that, yes, there's some incremental benefit to it, but what's much more important is the long-term trajectory.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#5

Right. That's helpful. That's very comprehensive. And just 2 quick follow-ups on that. One, the brewer uptick you've seen, how much of that is new customers versus sort of upgrading existing customers? Is your sense that, that's more incremental longer-term? Or is it just sort of taking customers that might otherwise have come in over the next year or 2? And then second, can you help put in perspective a bit more the size of the office and hospitality business in coffee relative to at-home relative market shares, et cetera, however you want to frame that?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#6

Yes. You would when -- one of the metrics that we discount in our earnings calls are brewer sales. There's been a lot of attempts to correlate brewer sales with household penetration growth. And we say, over time, there's a correlation, not -- that there's not -- it's not a direct one-to-one. And definitely, on a quarterly basis, it's almost meaningless. Because embedded in those numbers is a combination of people replacing our existing brewers with new households coming in. So you've seen in the Q2 results, and if you look at the NPD data that I just referenced, you're seeing a big increase in the number of brewers that we sold. It's a mix between new households coming in as well as existing households upgrading their machine. They're both good because, as I said, this is a subscription business. You want people to re-up, and they're doing that. And then when people come in, it's very sticky. When our success rate in a new household coming into the system, our success rate of them staying for the long haul is very, very high. So the numbers that you're seeing in our brewer sales are a mixture of the 2, and we don't break them out specifically. But the most important takeaway is every new household that we bring in now is an annuity for the long-term, and they're not going to drop out post-pandemic. This is a behavior that sticks for the long-term. Your point about the away-from-home -- your question about away-from-home coffee, we've not broken that out either. But what we have said, I can talk a little bit about that, is about half of our coffee business is in untracked channels. That includes away-from-home, which has taken a big hit; specialty retail; department stores; et cetera. You can imagine those have taken a hit. The Canadian business is in there, and Canada's behavior looks a lot like the U.S. Everything I just said before applies to Canada. But also in there is e-com. And I think it's important to just take a moment to say e-com has been a very big driver of growth, and it's been able to offset some of that hit that we talked about in specialty retail, and to a degree, away-from-home. We said on our Q2 call that e-com represented 10% of KDP sales. You can imagine that's a much more meaningful number in coffee systems. And I think that, that is another really strong future indicator that as our business becomes more developed in e-commerce, that's stronger towards the long-term trends, where consumers are going, where they're shopping for the future.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#7

Hey, Bob, just one follow-up to Dara's question, more longer term. If Keurig was building household penetration early on wedding registries, so getting on the wedding registry was one way that it was -- an effective way of sort of getting in the household -- early household formation. And another was people -- consumers were actually replacing -- using the Keurig machine as a replacement for drinking coffee away-for-home. So put a mug in the machine before you got in the car and left in the morning. So are those 2 behaviors still relevant today? Are they still driving sort of adoption into the system today?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#8

Very much so. Gifting is an important driver, and what we've talked about in the past is a requested gift is better than an unrequested gift. So when somebody puts it on a wedding registry, that's the definition of a requested gift. But it has always been a driver. And your second driver, which is using this in a replacement for away-from-home coffee, becomes even more relevant if we were to enter into a recession because now you've got a much bigger installed base. The quality of the machines and the coffee that it produces is significantly greater. And remember, we've got K-Café and K-Latte that produce cappuccinos and lattes. So there's a lot -- it's a much better-installed base than it once was. And that conversion for cost reasons is available, not to mention our pod price is way down it was before. Just as -- one more point on gifting. We had a very strong Mother's Day. We talked about that on our Q2 call. And when you -- when we get feedback from retailers, as we gear up now for the Christmas and the end-of-year holiday season, we're seeing some real interest and strength from retailers as well. In an environment like this, there's a shift to more pragmatic gifts. And with all of the innovation that we have coming out there, we're giving people a reason to really push Keurig for gifting. And so we're very optimistic about that being a continued driver of household penetration.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#9

Maybe, Ozan, just to shift a little bit. On the last earnings call, it was pretty clear that you had a bias in the second half of the year to reinvest any upside that there might be -- back behind the business. And so I just wanted to better understand that, especially after 2Q was a little bit better, and maybe the theoretical benefits of COVID on the top-line. And even after the away-from-home weakness, it sounds like top-line benefits that emerge could be offset by reinvestment. So I guess, is that the case? Or is it more net that there probably is not much top-line benefit by year-end, putting all your puts and takes together?

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#10

Yes. Thanks, Bryan, and good morning, everyone. First of all, let me start with the fact that, as Bob was saying, the COVID-19 environment was not a windfall for us at all. In fact, it was a product of effective mix management and a ruthless prioritization. Let me expand what do I mean with those points. For example, when you take a channel look, we have experienced and is still the case significant swings within our channels from the sales channels perspective. It is true that at-home consumption of our beverages has increased while the office and hospitality coffee consumption has declined significantly as has fountain foodservice, convenience and gas on the cold beverage side of our equation. When we take, for example, look of the products and the packaging formats of our business, we have also seen significant swings in what consumers are buying in terms of the rapid shift like shifting toward larger multipack sizes away from more profitable, either impulse or convenience-driven items. Well, we have had to drive our growth areas harder to offset the pressure from declining segments. And when our share gains across our CORE portfolio is a great example to this. We have also had to manage the cost side of our portfolio to offset the negative mix impacts and continue to deliver on our financial commitments by doing several things. We should not forget that we are more than into 2 years of our integration process that actually enabled us to have a great visibility as well as the management of all the cost drivers across the network across our company. A couple of them to share as an example is significantly lower travel and entertainment expenses. Also, some reduced marketing spending given that the return on investments were not there in some of the investments that we were planning to do before. And at times, it was not even appropriate to continue or carry on with the investments that we thought. Therefore, it was not a justified environment perhaps and as part of the oil sector that had some reductions. Plus, again, as I said, we had great visibility in all other controllable cost drivers. We are managing this business for the long-term, no question on that. Therefore, we never like to reduce marketing spend. But this is an extraordinary year in which everyone has needed to do so. Having said that, we continue to deliver our merger algorithm on the financial results that the commitments that we put out there. And let's make sure that all those financial returns have been well above our peer set. Therefore, we believe it makes sense to reinvest any financial upside beyond those already aggressive returns back into brand growth and innovation to ensure continued momentum in 2020 and beyond.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#11

Okay. That's very clear. So -- and just to be clear, it's really investing. A lot of it sounds like it will go behind innovation, right? Just teeing up the innovation pipeline for next year, is that a big priority in back half of the year?

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#12

With -- innovation investments have always been priority, and that has never changed. And we are increasing our innovation investments in all parts of our business whenever we see the opportunity. And that applies, as you say, both this year as well as next year as well as by considering the longer-term of our top-line as well as bottom-line growth.

Robert Gamgort

executive
#13

Yes. And Bryan, we've had -- just to add to that, we've had very strong innovation on the cold side as well as the hot side in 2020 that has served us really well. We'd like to invest incrementally behind those if we have the opportunity because we see opportunity now to continue to build household penetration on the cold side as well as the hot side of our franchise.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#14

Right. Okay. And then maybe -- I know it's early to talk a little bit about '21, but at a high level, I guess, Ozan, if you could talk a little bit about maybe how you're seeing the external environment shaping up, maybe some of the considerations like on comparisons, maybe some of the company-specific levers that you have to deliver on your '21 targets. I know there's going to be some concern about whether it's a tough comparison year or not in 2020. Again, we talked a lot about puts and takes. But just -- maybe just at a high level, just kind of how you're thinking about the environment for next year as you see it today and how that sort of squares with delivering on your targets for next year?

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#15

Sure. And please let me start by saying that Keurig Dr Pepper, we are only one of the few companies that have provided visibility into the 2020 financial results delivery for the full year and not just for the next quarter. And that visibility included a double-digit EPS growth as well as a significant debt reduction. We continue to express our confidence in our 3-year merger algorithm, which takes us through the end of 2021. And 2021, we likely expect to continue to be another volatile and challenging year. But if this crisis has proven anything, it is that we can drive our business to succeed in nearly any working environment. That speaks to the long-term confidence we have in this business and how we have been running and have the control, both the top and the bottom-line drivers. We will share our 2021 outlook at the appropriate time, no question on that. Let me provide a few thoughts. We are on track to achieve our leverage ratio of 3x or below by next year, which will provide significant optionality to create value for our shareholders. For example, cash generation is and will continue to be exceptionally strong. As you would remember, when we announced our 2019 full-year results, our cash flow conversion ratio was in excess of 140%. And in quarter 2, this year, 2020, the same ratio was approximately 112%, and we expect it to continue to be strong going forward. We are currently investing in several large projects as well that will provide productivity and support of our growth in future. Just to name a few, the state-of-the-art K-Cup pod production facility that we are building as we speak in Spartanburg, South Carolina; for Beverage Concentrates, our newest Allentown facility; and for the Beverage Concentrates, the new facility we are building in Ireland. So we will still have considerable white space in our portfolio that we can address through many means, likes of M&A, partnerships, innovation and so forth. I believe we have proven our ability to execute in each of these areas with strong brands that we have brought into the KDP portfolio and that we will continue as such, Bryan.

Robert Gamgort

executive
#16

Hey, Bryan, one -- just one thing. You talked about a tough compare. We get some of those questions. Is this going to be a tough compare next year? This goes back to a couple of points we made a couple of times. So apologies for reiterating, but I think it's really important. This is -- this situation in 2020 is by no means a windfall for us. We've had a large number of negatives impact our business as well as the positive. So as Ozan said, this is really a mix management exercise that I think we've executed really well. So as the economy and the environment changes in '21, there are equal number of rebounds that we get. It's not a situation where we had a windfall, now we have to comp against that. We got a lot of negatives. I talked about away-from-home coffee that we get a rebound on as well. So it's a very different situation than a lot of other CPG companies that have been able to get a onetime benefit in '20. We're quite different than that.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#17

Right. Yes, very clear.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#18

And then Ozan, maybe we can talk about coffee pricing for a bit. Retail pricing has improved recently aided by mix. Obviously, that accrues to your partners, not necessarily KDP as much. But I was just hoping we could review the pricing environment in coffee longer-term post-COVID. And also with smart brewers now out there, recyclability coming in the U.S., it seems like you're sort of upgrading your system relative to other alternatives that are out there. So does that factor into pricing over time, how should we think about the relationship with your partners over time and how much of an impact that might have?

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#19

Sure. So let's take a step back, just to refresh our memories. As Bob also referenced, during our March 2018 Investor Day, we set the followings. And I think we'll shed quite a bit of light to your question as well, Dara. At that time, we said pricing was starting to moderate, and volume was improving, but not enough to offset the pricing from a negative perspective. Then we also said and projected that as pricing continued to moderate, volume would accelerate, driving revenue growth of 2% to 3%, and the margin would continue to expand. Well, we are more than 2 years, 2.5 years into that. And what we have seen? Let's take a look at it, exactly what we said. For example, in 2018, pricing was down almost 4%. Net sales were flat, and margin expanded approximately 300 basis points. Then when we take a look to what has happened, for example, in 2020, first half, pricing was down less than 3%, net sales were up 3%, and margin continued to expand another 120 basis points. So COVID-19 environment doesn't change that long-term outlook, but the pricing trends you mentioned do confirm our consumer elasticity insights, that overall pricing has reached a level where consumers believe pods are a good value. And the category has evolved into good, better and best pricing structure. With the stronger growth at the best level in 2020 that we are all seeing when you look, for example, to IRi's and reason all these kind of data, pricing for the coffee systems in our profit and loss statement primarily reflects the contracts and the partnerships that we have in place. Those investments, while predictable to us, are not always evenly paced. It's an important point to note that creates some fluctuations. Most importantly, all the investment in pricing, and very importantly, the productivity we were driving to enable the investment is transparent to us. So we run all these things around a very tight strategy and execution as we have communicated several times. Please note that Coffee System margins continue to expand, 140 basis, for example, in quarter 2 this year as we continue to make these investments.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#20

Okay. And as we think about the long-term on the pricing front, obviously, one of the goals in the last few years was with the significant cost savings you've had. You could sort of reinvest that in pricing and drive household adoption. You mentioned that we're now getting to a more sustained pricing level in consumers' minds. As you think about long-term, is there less of a need to take pricing down over time? How should we think about that looking out from a multiyear standpoint?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#21

I mean, I'll take this one, Dara. I mean, I think if you look forward on this, as we said, we've got long-term visibility to the pricing that shows up in our P&L because they're long-term agreements with our partners. What they choose to do with the pricing we give them is really up to them. Those partners are branded partners as well as store brands. And the environment right now is allowing for retail price stability and increases, but that's really up to them to do that. And just because, as we pointed out before, if somebody wants to invest in pricing because they want to gain share or because they have -- they want to drive foot traffic in their stores, that's really up to them to do that. So it's impossible for us to predict. The most important thing that our investors need to take away, though, is we have line of sight to the pricing that we're going to realize on our P&L, and we have that matched up with the productivity programs that you talked about. They don't always come in the same period, but we have line of sight to that one, and that's what gives us the confidence to do so. I think your other point, though, about in the future, can pricing go the other direction? I think that's an innovation idea. And that's -- we'll talk a little -- I'm sure we'll talk about brewer innovation, but there's broader innovation conversation that we could have that would give you an indication that we could do that.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#22

Right. Okay. Why don't we switch to brewer innovation then? Obviously, you've come out with the smart brewer recently. You can control it from your phone, customize that to customers' needs in terms of temperature, brew preferences, et cetera. I guess, first, how significant an upgrade is this in your mind both from a retail customer and maybe from a partner perspective? What are the financial implications as you think about that longer-term and sort of the advantages that can emerge from having a smart brewer?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#23

Yes. As I was saying it earlier, our innovation pipeline across brewers is strong, and it continues to get stronger every year. If you look at some of the platforms we introduced in the past couple of years, and that's the way we think about that, is how do we go after platforms that we know unlocks the consumer household penetration. Specialty coffee with the K-Café, K-Latte, those brewers continue to do very well. K-Duo lineup, which allows consumers to do large batch and single serve, also continues to go well. And then which we're introducing -- what we're introducing for the holidays is the K-Supreme and the K-Supreme Plus, which now have this multistream technology, which is the 5 needles, which gives you more extraction. It also controls temperature and strength better. We're doing limited edition brewers with designer, Jonathan Adler. So there is a portfolio of brewers now that is completely different than it was several years ago, and they attack specific consumer needs. And that's what's giving this continued and sustained growth -- strong growth in household penetration. One of those platforms that we've been talking about all the way back to the Investor Day in 2018 were smart brewers. We were in smart brewers, but we were doing it in a limited format with this connected brewer panel. That gave us -- it continues to give us incredible data that we use to manage the business. We also make that data available to our partners, but it was also our opportunity to test connected brewers who could -- which could recognize the pods and eventually make adjustments to the brew algorithm to optimize that. That's now ready for consumer sale. And so like all technology, you start small, you expand your knowledge, you see how consumers use the technology, the cost curve improves, and then you cascade that into more models. So let's be clear, this is our entry point, and it's a beautiful machine that will be high-priced, and it's our flagship right now in terms of not only the intelligence of the brewer, but the quality of the brewer. But let's be clear, our intention is to take everything I just said and cascade it down through our brewer lineup. And we want all of our brewers in the future to be smart. Because what they're able to do is they recognize the pod, and that pod recognition allows them to brew each pod differently based on the recipe that the menu -- the roaster of the coffee provides to us. As you said, it allows people to brew remotely, which believe it or not is the #1 request that we get from consumers. It provides a better range around temperature and strength, which were the 2 variables that consumers want to control and customize their coffee. And then it opens up the door for something very interesting, which is intelligent auto reordering of K-Cup pod. We have a pretty good auto reorder business right now through keurig.com, but it's based on ordering patterns. Imagine if we were able to do that with actual consumption patterns at the SKU level. I don't know, somebody's got to mute down there. So our intention is, this is the start of it, but we're excited about the future. It by no means is the end. We expect this just to be the very beginning.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#24

Okay. And as you think about market share, obviously, you have a very large percentage of the market out there between your own brands and your partner brands. Your own brands have seen a pickup in market share recently during COVID. Is that something you think could be sustainable post-COVID? What's driving that? But also, as you just think about the overall bucket with your partners included, are there big chunks of the market left that you can sort of go after, particularly with some of the private label manufacturers out there? Are there reasons to believe you can make progress in terms of gaining some new customers? Or will there always be these manufacturers out there that are willing to sort of compete pretty aggressively on price? How do you think about that?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#25

Yes. Well, in my last point -- I'll pick up the last point first, and then I'll go to the bigger question, which is we clearly have been willing to compete aggressively on price as well, but we've had the productivity and the innovation to be able to expand margin by doing so, which I put that in the clear category of a win for everybody, including consumers. But from the bigger picture perspective, what we say is a critical metric is KDP manufactured. We're north of 80%. That's a really good number. Can that number be bigger? Yes, I mean, in theory, but you can imagine at 80%, we've got almost every single coffee brand in the system. And then of the store brands, we have the great majority of them. And those that aren't in the system tend to be much more price focused than quality focused. And there's a point in which you say I don't want to compete for business where there's no consideration for the quality that we provide. And what we've been able to demonstrate is that we're not the cheapest, but by far the best quality, and 80-plus percent of coffee decisions have voted in our favor, and that's a good place to be. That leaves us free to really manage growth of the system on behalf of us and our partners. And that's what our partners want us to do. They want to continue to -- us to continue to drive household penetration because that's where the real win is for them, not in the next fraction of the cent of cost on the pod. You asked a question about our owned and licensed portfolio. Let me go back because, again, the theme is consistent. The long-term view is most helpful. At onetime, Keurig had a 100% share with its owned and licensed brands of a very small system. There was a strategic decision made a year ago that we -- years ago that we all benefit from, which is to open the system. All of the other single-serve systems that we're competing were brand focused. They all failed, and the one open platform succeeded. And so as the -- that's the great success story of Keurig. The downside, if you want to call it a downside, is that owned and licensed share, by definition, declined every single year. What we said back in 2018, when we did our Investor Day, is there's a point which pretty much every major coffee brand that can be in the system is. And the owned and licensed share declines would moderate and that we weren't that concerned about it because we care most about household penetration and the ecosystem. Everything that we said in 2018 is happening right now. It's not happening anything that's related to COVID. It's driven by the stability of the number of brands entering the ecosystem and the fact that we put a significant amount of marketing and innovation behind our flagship brands, and they're responding to it. And then 2 other points on this one. One is I will remind everyone that McCafe moved from being a partner brand into a licensed brand, that will start showing up in the IRi and the Nielsen numbers, if it hasn't already in your reports. But that is a good boost to our total owned and licensed brand portfolio. When we go to retail and we sell promotions and merchandising, it gives us even more strength. And then also, we talk -- people talk about private label in the context of being competitive to us. We care about the ecosystem, and we are the majority manufacturer of private label, and we are perfectly happy with the role they play in the system of providing an entry-level price point.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#26

Bob, maybe if we can shift to the cold side of the business and maybe talk a little bit about market share. You've had good performance with Dr Pepper, but also with this year really across a lot of the brands in your cold portfolio this year in terms of market share. So maybe you could talk a little bit about maybe not what's just driving it specifically this year, but going back to the merger and some of the changes you've made in your approach to the cold business and carbonated soft drinks specifically and kind of what you've -- how you've changed the approach, and really, what do you think -- do you believe that you can continue to gain share going forward?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#27

Yes. Yes, I mean, as you point out, we were gaining share prior to this. We've seen good share performance during the crisis, and I'll give you a couple of reasons why that is because I think that's important to understand. And then again, let me talk about the future, it is your question about, how do I look at this opportunity going forward? So a couple of facts that are important. We gained share not just in CSDs, but across the entire LRB portfolio. In fact, nearly every single category and brand in our portfolio has gained share. That's the equivalent of 90% of our liquid refreshment beverage retail base gaining share. CSDs have been an even stronger performer in there. In the latest 13 weeks, we've gained almost 1.5 share points. And I think the most important thing to -- towards your future question is what's driving this is more coming from new households into our brands rather than existing households consuming more. And that's very bullish on your question about can you continue to do this going forward. Why have we done well? It's pretty straightforward to explain. It's always hard to execute. Innovation has been strong. And our ability to innovate and renovate our CSD brands has been well documented. And this year, Canada Dry Bold, the Dr Pepper & Cream are good examples. Dr Pepper & Cream is the best-performing CSD. It's about to hit $150 million in retail sales in 2020. It's first year out. So that's a formula that's worked really well. We also invest heavily behind our key LRB brand. And the quality of our marketing and our high returns is documented. And you can see how well it's working right now. And even though college football looks different this year, we're still out with Dr Pepper Fansville campaign. I watched it over the weekend a number of times. And those -- that is a formula that works really well for our key brands. And then I think the biggest shift that we've made -- because that formula I just described has been in place for a while. I think the biggest shift that we've made over the past year or so is the investment in our company-owned DSD system and our -- strengthening our partnerships with our independent distributors where we don't have company-owned DSD coverage. It's a very different relationship with that group than we had in the past. And the execution across those 2, but particularly in our company-owned DSD, has been incredibly strong. This is a example of day in and day out winning the shelf, winning the merchandising, servicing the customers better than anyone else. It is helping us gain share. It's a combination of management and process and talent. It's also examples of investments that we've made in our company-owned DSD system. And we're crystal clear on -- we get the question all the time, how do you think about DSD going forward? We're crystal clear. We see it as a strategic advantage. It can be -- always be more efficient and more effective, which is where the investments go. But if the pandemic has proven anything, it has proved that being able to control your own distribution system is a huge advantage, especially one that's centrally controlled and is able to deliver the innovation and deliver the merchandising that I talked about previously, and that will continue into the future.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#28

That actually is a good tie into one of the questions we got from the audience, which kind of comes down to the complexity in the business, right? You've got 7 routes to market and seemingly a business model that's got a lot of complexity to it. So now that you've been in this for a while, any thoughts towards is that complexity a competitive advantage? Is there rooms to tweak it to maybe drive higher margins? Just how you're thinking about the kind of the business model as it sits today?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#29

Yes. A couple of observations. One is it's more complex from the outside than it is from the inside. We know it really well. We live it every day. And so we know where the priorities are. We know what to focus on to shift. We know what to maintain, and we know which areas to almost ignore. In the end, I am firmly convinced it's a competitive advantage because we have this unique ability to distribute our products where it makes sense, warehouse direct for the most efficient delivery, cost-efficient delivery, where do you want effectiveness, and that is DSD. And we just talked about our DSD being unique to others. And then we have other aspects of our delivery system like offices we talked about earlier and e-commerce. And the point is wherever the consumer shops, we have a -- the ability to get product to that consumer in the most effective and cost-efficient way possible. Yes, it's really complex from the outside, and sometimes it's hard to explain. But I think that's part of the magic for us and our ability to master that and run that. And yes, we know where there's opportunities to improve it, and that's part of what you're seeing right now.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#30

And then maybe if we talk a little bit about the Polar relationship and how that came to be, and maybe if you could talk a little bit about how that relationship will work and maybe how it might differ from some of your other Allied Brand relationships.

Robert Gamgort

executive
#31

Yes. We have more white space on our portfolio than our peers. We view that as a opportunity for growth in the future. The question is how do you get there? And there are a number of different mechanisms that we can use to get there, and one of them is partnership. And so we are flexible and thoughtful about how we go after the white space in our category. So let's take sparkling water, really great segment. We had a very small presence in it. Sparkling water has grown 15-plus percent in the last year. It's accelerated to over 20% in more recent periods. We think it is still on the upswing of adoption among consumers. And so we need to participate in that. So we could develop or accelerate our own brands. We could acquire somebody at a seed level. We could acquire a large player or we could do a partnership. You cannot prescribe in advance which is the right outcome. You have to pursue all of those. And this is -- my answer for that is the same for every other segment in which we have white space. The Polar one is unique because it's a great brand. It's the third largest brand. It's only in 1/3 of the country, which makes it the highest velocity seltzer, but they needed a path to fill out 2/3 of the country. We've had a 30-year relationship with Polar because in the Northeast, particularly in New England, they manufacture and distribute some of our key brands. And so this is a known entity. Both of us are known entities to each other, and that gave them the comfort to enter into a long-term franchise agreement where we will manufacture and distribute the product, not just be a distributor, for the parts of the country that they don't cover. That's the ultimate win-win structure. We would -- if we had a chance to own the brand, we would, but we don't. And so you have to then say, what is your other alternative? We think this is a very unique structure enabled by our flexibility, our route-to-market capability that is attractive to them, and the fact that we have this long-term partnership, and we know each other really well.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#32

And I guess, we can't talk about seltzers without asking about hard seltzers. So if you kind of give us your thoughts and observations about the category and how it may or may not fit for KDP?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#33

Yes. We look at everything. Right now, we have focused in the nonalcoholic segment. I want to talk about what our plans might be in the future, but the approach that I described earlier is the way we think about all categories, which ones are attractive, where do we have coverage or not, and then how do we access the areas of white space, and do we have any right to be in that category? Do we have a brand? Do we have a distribution or manufacturing capability? Is there some value added that we provided in there? And that's how we think about it. I'm not going to say more about hard seltzer. We'll say about water, though. Water was one of those strategic categories back in 2018 or during the merger that we said we want to have a bigger share of premium water, not commodity water, premium water. Look at where we are today now with Polar. But you have Polar to the CORE acquisition, to the partnership what we announced back in 2018 with evian was buy and now even smaller acquisitions like Limitless. We're the #2 premium water company since 2018 because we put a real focus on it. So when we decide that we want to be in a category, we have a strategy, we can get there. The category you're talking about is one of many that we evaluate and just not ready to talk about what our plans might be.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#34

So Ozan, maybe moving to the margin front. We spent a lot of time on top-line questions. Just help give us some comfort on you still reaching your synergy target of $600 million. Obviously, supply chain has become stressed in a COVID environment. So why are you still comfortable with that goal despite theoretically maybe some delays in meeting pieces of it given COVID? And just overall, your general level of visibility as you think about synergies looking out for the end of next year.

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#35

Sure. Absolutely. I mean, first of all, let me reiterate our position on the 3-year algorithm that we laid out at the time of the merger, which is very much intact, no question on that. Also, as it relates to synergies, we remain very confident in delivering the $600 million over 3 years. As you know, the first year is starting with '19 and ending 2021. And look what is happening in this during COVID-19 environment -- working environment. I believe we have demonstrated our ability, which is very important to be agile and flexible. That enabled us to accelerate some of the projects that are easier to do or execute in this environment to replace others that are more complicated or require some delays, which allowed us to deliver still as we stated on our financial commitments. So this is a very important point. And as I also said, Dara, a couple of minutes ago, given that we are more than 2.5 years into our -- more than 2 years into our merger, we also developed a great visibility into all of the cost drivers that we have across our entire business, which is very, very important. And you have seen how quickly we put into service, for example, some of the value creation ideas and still successfully delivering against our targets that have been built out for 2020 as well. Therefore, the bottom line is that we are on track to deliver $600 million synergies over 3 years' period, and we have no concern, which includes again overall delivery of our EPS as well as the deleveraging targets besides the synergies.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#36

Maybe we touched on it a little bit earlier, but maybe for both Bob and Ozan, if we could a little bit more about capital allocation and looking beyond, once we're below the 3x leverage. And I guess, a couple of questions there. I think one of the perceptions that investors had when the merger first occurred was this was going to be a business model that you put these 2 companies together, you delever the balance sheet and then it becomes an acquisition vehicle. So I guess, first question is, is that a good characterization of how we should be -- how investors should be thinking about the business model going forward? And then the second, I guess, tied to that opening -- building a concentrate manufacturing plant in Ireland is pretty far away from St. Louis, I think, which is where your bigger one is, does that at all imply expansion internationally in terms of maybe where you might be thinking in terms of M&A?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#37

Yes. Let me start off, Bryan. Maybe a couple of thoughts on this, and then I'll turn it over to Ozan to give you some thoughts about how we view optionality in 2021 and beyond that. I think the point that becomes a acquisition, take synergies out and then you got to reload is based on some models that are out there in the food industry primarily, where I think the outcome hasn't been great. And we reject that every time we hear that. And I could go in a really long answer of why we are a completely different business model than that, but the short answer to that is our previous conversation. The difference is we're delivering our $600 million in synergies, we're delivering EPS growth at double-digit levels and probably the most rapid deleveraging you would have seen in the CPG space, but yet we're growing share on 90% of our retail base. And we're investing heavily in marketing innovation. That's -- the piece I keep pointing to investors is doing all of the costs and the deleveraging side is absolutely critical. Doing that at the same time that you're accelerating your growth, capturing market share and investing heavily not only in innovation, but in long-term platforms, is a massive differentiator. And I don't think there's another model that looks like that. Having said that, which I'll give to Ozan to talk about, your point about when the leverage ratio is down below 3x, is M&A part of the value creation story going forward? It absolutely can be, but it doesn't have to be. We don't have a strategy that is dependent upon M&A. We have a strategy that will deliver significant and superior total shareholder return with the optionality of M&A, which nobody controls. Ozan, do you want to add a couple of thoughts on how we think about post 2021?

Ozan Dokmecioglu

executive
#38

Absolutely, Bob. Absolutely. Not to repeat what you said. And our -- and first of all, Bryan, to address our near-term focus, 100% remains on deleveraging, as we stated many, many times, which would be in line with the targets that we set at the time of the merger. Then once we lower our leverage at 3x and below next year, which becomes your second part of your question, post 2021. When we achieve those leverage target ratios, we will have far more flexibility and optionality for value creation. But please make sure that as Bob was saying as well a couple of minutes ago, we never made our, let's say, leverage ratio being a little bit high to get into any M&A deals. We just did in 2018 using our shares or a stock deal for CORE Hydration, for example. So what does this mean? That means that whenever there's a good white space filling or compatible brand or company that we like to go after as part of M&A transaction, definitely, we would, as was the case. So -- but it is also important to note that we are a highly cash-generative business, and we will assess all options for the use of cash based on the operating environment to drive value creation for shareholders as what we have been doing. As Bob said, this include or may include M&A, dividends, investing further in our business behind innovation, our distribution network as well. So a host of other areas to allocate capital in the interest of continuously driving shareholder value. And just a quick touch to your last part of your question with regards to Ireland investment being far away from St. Louis, that is true. But there are quite a bit of merits from the business side that it makes sense for us to build a concentrate facility in Ireland. For example, the main reason why we are doing -- a couple of reasons we are doing it, and one of the main ones is to create a second facility for the very important for our business from a manufacturing capability perspective. And when we look to the expertise as well as the source of the major raw material, majority, in fact, coming from Europe, so Ireland being at the forefront of Europe and very close proximity to the U.S. and the shipment quantities of concentrate needed was not making it any less economically negative or detrimental to what we have today. And obviously, resources, talent as well as being close to the raw material source were very, very important criterias for us. And of course, there are areas we announced publicly. Of course, there will be some further financial benefits as well, but that is not the only reason, but it's a whole package.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#39

Okay. And then maybe, Bob, last one, just more on an ESG angle, but tied to pods, just 100% recyclability. Can you just update us on where you stand there in terms of getting there for the end of the year? And then -- or I guess, into next year? And do you see that as sort of having been maybe a limiting factor in terms of household adoption of the Keurig systems?

Robert Gamgort

executive
#40

Yes. So all of Canada was converted in 2018. And by the end of this year, all of the U.S. pods will be recyclable as well. I mean, we're in the -- the last time I checked, we're north of 95% already there. And that allows us to activate more communication around that. We did a barrier analysis that we put in that March of 2018 investor deck. So you can go back and look at it, what are the barriers to entry. Sustainability, recyclability was one of those barriers. So we knew we had to get after that, plus it's just the right thing to do, and it's part of our broader sustainability platform across the entire business. So we're well on track with that. And I would put that in the same category as improving quality, improving innovation, of all the reasons why consumers will be free to come into the Keurig system over the long-term, and it -- but it's a very important one. And the good news is we're just about done with it.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#41

Okay. Well, we're just about at the top of the hour. So on behalf of Dara, Bob, Ozan, we really want to thank you for spending time with us. It was, as always, really helpful for us in terms of furthering our education, helpful for investors. Hope you all have a good rest of the day and look forward to catching up at earnings.

Robert Gamgort

executive
#42

Excellent. Thanks for hosting us today.

Bryan Spillane

analyst
#43

All right. Thanks, guys.

Dara Mohsenian

analyst
#44

Thanks, guys. Appreciate it.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.