Kitron ASA (KIT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 10, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Lars Nilsson
executiveGood morning, everyone, and welcome to Kitron's Q2 2026 Results Presentation. I'm Peter Nilsson. And as always, I'm joined by our CFO, Cathrin Nylander. Thank you for taking the time to be with us today. The theme for today's call is on the slide in front of you, resilience by design. Across our markets, customers are reorganizing their supply chains around resilience and origin rather than lowest cost. That shift is structural, and it plays directly to the platform we spent the past decade building, distributed, disciplined and close to the programs that matter. Q2 is what it looks like in numbers. I'll cover the quarter highlights, our operational position, the sector and order backlog picture and the strategic outlook. Cathrin will then take you through the financials, including a cash flow story we're particularly pleased with this quarter. I'll close with the case for our medium-term ambition before we open the floor for your questions. So let's get started. Next slide, please. Q2 extended the longest run in Kitron's history. Revenue of EUR 296 million, operating profit over EUR 28 million with an EBIT margin of 9.6%. The order backlog, EUR 794 million, up 56% year-on-year and an operating cash flow of EUR 47 million in the quarter. I'll let Cathrin tell the story, but I'll say this much now. The cash engine is turned on. The real story isn't in any single number. The real story is breadth. All 5 of our market sectors grew year-on-year, and all 3 of our regions did too. Defense and Aerospace more than tripled and now represents around half of group revenue. But connectivity grew 18%, medical 16%; Industry 13% and electrification 7%. The diversification we've been talking about for several years keeps showing up in the numbers. One thing to flag upfront, our Nordic and North America region delivered margins slightly below target. I'll explain exactly why when we get to the regional picture. It's a supply timing story, not a demand story. With that, let me walk you through where we stand operationally. So next slide, please. Four points on operations and growth. First, execution. And it starts with our teams delivering customer ramp-ups across every site. In Central Europe, that discipline showed up as 14.7% EBIT margin as capacity expansion converts the defense ramp into profit. In Asia, Malaysia reached breakeven in June for the first time. And what matters more is what comes next, a significant volume ramp through the rest of the year. The outlook is stronger here than the rearview mirror. This is a volume story. And in Norway, we're building for what's ahead. The Long site came into service early in the quarter, and now we've largely completed the production transfers from Shieldsund. The 2 sites will specialize ShieldSund on electronics and PCBA, Longum on high-level assembly and systems integration, so we can scale defense work without losing focus. Second, the supply chain because that is the defining condition of 2026. The Electronics supply chain tightened further in the first half, and we expect allocations conditions to persist into the second half. This cycle is different from the last one. AI compute is structurally reallocating memory substrates and board capacity and industrial manufacturers now compete directly with data center demand for the same certified high reliability capacity. Our response is discipline, long horizon purchase orders, inventory commitments backed in many cases, funded by our customers, dual sourcing and early escalation. Late supplier decommitments and pushouts remain part of daily life. We planned for them, and we're managing this, not absorbing it. Third, new business, and this is a point about the quality of demand, not just the quantity. During the quarter, we booked a broad set of new programs across all 5 market sectors, split evenly between new and existing customers while extending business in competition. We welcome new customers in autonomous defense, 5G connectivity and solid-state power units, alongside new programs in ruggedized edge computing and quantum security. Individually, these wins fall below our threshold for public announcement. Collectively, they're exactly the diversification we've been building for. Fourth, our 2026 outlook. We're now trending towards the top end of the ranges previously communicated, the EUR 900 million to EUR 150 million in revenue and the EUR 84 million and EUR 108 million in EBIT. Our task in the second half is converting demand through a tight supply chain and the capacity keeps expanding where the demand is. Further expansion is in early planning in some cases, together with our customers. Let's look at the sector picture. So next slide, please. Well, the chart tells the story at a glance, Defense and aerospace is the headline, EUR 154 million in the quarter, up 234% year-on-year, now around half of group revenue. European rearment, unmanned systems, missile programs, combat vehicles, naval hardware, structural demand that shows no sign of cooling. But the point I want you to take away is that every single sector grew, again, connectivity was up 18%, driven by industrial IoT and smart sensor solutions. Medical was up 16%, led by Critical Care. Electrification was up 7% with data -- as I said, order backlog stands at EUR 794 million, up 56% year-over-year, and about 1.5% below the record we set in Q1. I want to spend a moment on the sequential move because it's exactly what a healthy backlog should do. The decline sits at 2 sites where our largest defense and industrial programs are shipping. That's backlog converting into record revenue you just saw. Year-to-date, book-to-bill is 1.15, and it keeps refilling the book. EUR 653 million of order intake in the first half, EUR 1.25 billion on a rolling 12-month basis. Defense and Aerospace now represents 60% of total backlog, up 45% from a year ago. Our R6, which is the forward-looking 6-month demand communicated to our customers and our system, stands at approximately EUR 609 million. As always, 2 things are to keep in mind when you read it. First, R6 is intentionally front loaded. We deliberately built in roughly 10% of flexibility so the supply variability can be absorbed without disrupting customer commitments. That doesn't mean that we're looking at 2 quarters around EUR 300 million. Second, Q3 seasonally are softer for us, and that's a normal feature of our calendar, not a sign of demand weakness. What matters the most is the structural shape, a record level book broad sector distribution, intake ahead of billings and customer relationships that are deepening. We've never entered the second half with this kind of forward visibility. And with that, I would like to hand over to Cathrin for some financial details. So next slide, please.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveThank you, Peter. Let me walk you through the financial picture in more detail, starting with the headline numbers. revenue of close to EUR 296 million, up almost 72% year-on-year. EBIT of over EUR 28 million, up almost 89%. EBIT margin of 9.6%, 90 basis points higher than Q2 last year. EBITDA of EUR 35 million, up 79%, net income of EUR 21.4 million more than doubled, EPS of EUR 0.10, double from EUR 0.05. Operating cash flow was EUR 47 million in the quarter against EUR 19 million in Q2 last year. That's the number I'm most pleased with, and I'll talk more on the cash flow slide in a moment. On the balance sheet ratios, ROC on a rolling 3-month basis at 39%, up 16 percentage points from a year ago. Net working capital at 15.4% of sales, down from EUR 26.8 million. Cash conversion cycle at 60 days, down from 104. Net interest-bearing debt over EBITDA at 0.3x, down from 1.4, net equity ratio of 9%. Let's take a look at what this means for the first half of the year. Next slide, please. The half year view puts the quarter in context, revenue of EUR 568 million, up close to 69% in the first half of last year. EBIT of almost EUR 54 million, up 96%, essentially doubled. EBIT margin of 9.5%, 130 basis points higher year-on-year. Net income of EUR 41.4 million, up 135%. EPS of EUR 0.19, up 111%. And the line I would like to draw your attention to operating cash flow of over EUR 52 million for the half year close to our strategic target of 80% of EBITDA. At the half year mark, profit is converting fully into cash even while we fund close to 69% revenue growth. Very few companies growing at this rate can say that. Capital efficiency ratios, as you see on these slides, are the same rolling measures as the previous slide. They described the business as it runs today. ROC at 39%, working capital at 15.4% of sales, 60-day cash cycle and leverage of 0.3x EBITDA. Let's move to the regional breakdown. Next slide, please. Three regions and three tables. Starting with revenue. CE is now our largest region at EUR 140 million in the quarter, up 147% year-on-year. This is the capacity expansion delivering supporting the major defense customer ramps. Nordic and North America came in on EUR 131 million, up 36%; Asia at EUR 28 million, up 25%. On EBIT, CE delivered EUR 20.6 million, a margin of 14.7%, well above the group target. Asia delivered close to 10%. Nordics and North America delivered EUR 10.6 million and 8.1% margin, slightly below target, and this is where the supply phasing showed up. Defense deliveries at specific Nordic sites moved to the right because boards and components arrived late, not because demand changed. Uses exit rate points the right way recovering this region's margin, a clear second half execution priority. In Asia, I want to highlight the milestone. Malaysia reached breakeven in June for the first time since we started the greenfield operations there. And with a significant volume ramp-up projected for the rest of the year, the outlook is stronger than the rearview mirror. The site is maturing exactly as planned into our non-China alternative for Asia manufacturing. On headcount, we ended the quarter at 3,359 FTEs, up 36% year-on-year, but actually down slightly from Q1 as ramp proceeds to 0 production. The capacity buildup supports backlog conversion is largely in place. The focus now is productivity, and sales per employee is recovering. Now, the organic versus inorganic split. Next slide, please. [indiscernible] formerly Delta Nordic was consolidated as of 1st of January with no prior year comparables. So this slide splits the quarter into organic and inorganic for a clean underlying rate. Deette headline, even excluding Eltek, revenue grew 62% year-on-year. Defense & Aerospace tripled organically, up 214%. Connectivity and Medical are essentially pure organic growth. Industry shows small organic dip against a strong comparator. The Eltek contribution takes reported growth to plus 13%. On the order book, organic backlog is up almost 45% year-on-year to EUR 737 million, record level visibility even without the acquisition. Eltek adds EUR 57 million on top. One note on book-to-bill because the quarterly figure will attract questions. Organic book-to-bill was 1.05 in the quarter. Organic backlog is still building. Year-to-date, group book-to-bill stands at 1.15. Now, cash flow and working capital. A slide I've been looking forward to. Next slide, please. The short version, the cash engine has turned on. The quarter delivered EUR 47 million of operating cash and year-to-date operating cash flow of EUR 52.1 million and close to our strategic target of 80% of EBITDA. So where did it come from? Receivables were collected at the record deliveries of the spring converted to cash, thus keeping receivables stable. Payables were built in step with the growing purchasing volume. This is the customer funded working capital model doing what it is assigned to do even after all that, working capital still absorbed EUR 11 million in the first half, which is remarkably little for a growing to close to 69%. Net working capital ended at EUR 158 million, down almost 13% from a year ago in absolute terms, even though revenue is up 2/3. As a share of sales, that's 15.4% from 26.8% a year ago. What be straightforward about wanting, Q2 was exceptionally strong. The structural story is the trend. More our cash conversion cycle has come down from 117 days 4 quarters ago to 60 days today. The improvement is disciplined, not timing, and it's what we intend to sustain through the second half. On the investing side, capital expenditure that affects our capacity and footprint expansion, deliberate investment against contracted demand. Let me close the financial section with the ratios. Next slide, please. The ratios on this slide are the cleanest summary of how the business is performing. Three things stand out. First, return on operating capital is 39% on a rolling basis, up from 23% a year ago. This is operating leverage on a stable cost base, and it puts us at the top of the industry. Second, balance sheet strength. Net interest-bearing debt, that is EUR 30 million, 0.3x EBITDA with net gearing of 0.08 and an equity ratio of 39%. We have ample room to fund the growth in front of us, including further M&A if the right opportunity appears. Third, earnings per share, EUR 0.10 for the quarter doubled year-on-year, EUR 0.19 for the half. Revenue growth is translating directly into shareholder return. And the headline I'd leave you with, every important capital efficiency and balance sheet ratio improved year-on-year and cash conversion now matches to profit growth. With that, back to Peter for the strategic outlook. Next slide, please.
Lars Nilsson
executiveThank you, Cathrin, encouraging numbers, and something to be really proud of. So what does our medium-term outlook look like? Why is EUR 1.5 billion that we're talking about of annual revenue credible in the medium term? Let's start with some arithmetic. From this year's level, EUR 1.5 billion is not a moonshot. It's just a few more years of compounding what you've already watched us deliver on demand that is largely booked or in structured evaluation rather than imagined. EUR 794 million of backlog and above EUR 1.25 billion of order intake over the last 12 months and the pipeline that has changed character. It's no longer a list of opportunities. It's a schedule of decisions, named evaluations where we're shortlisted in, requests for quotation with dates on them, programs with production slots attached. Then the structure underneath, European defense rearmament, where EU instruments are now dispersing real money into multi-program -- multiyear program cycles and where 8 of our sites build defense and aerospace today. Grid and data center electrification, a demand cycle with years to run as Europe rebuilds its energy and compute infrastructure. And industrial digitalization, where industry's 1.4 book-to-bill tells you the recovery is being ordered now, not forecasted. And the honest framing, the constraint on that path is not demand. It's conversion, which is why you'll hear one word from us all second half, convert backlog into orders, pipeline into orders. or backlog into deliveries, pipeline into orders, right, profit into cash and capacity that follows the order book, and the order book keeps growing. Let me summarize with a few takeaways. Next slide, please. So 5 things to take away from Q2 2026. One, strength, record revenue, broad-based growth, EUR 296 million, up almost 72%, 62% organic. All 5 sectors and all 3 regions grew. Defense and Aerospace tripled and is now around half of group revenue. Two, profitability above target and converting to cash. EBIT of EUR 28 million at 9.6% margin and EUR 47 million of operating cash in the quarter. Year-to-date cash flow close to our strategic target of 80% of EBITDA. Three, record level order book and visibility, backlog of EUR 794 million, up 56% year-to-date book-to-bill 1.15. R6 demand outlook, approximately EUR 609 million, intentionally front-loaded for flexibility. Four, KitronNiltech delivering. footprint is expanding, EUR 16.5 million contributed in the quarter. Five, on the road to EUR 1.5 billion. We're currently trending towards the top end of our 2026 outlook of EUR 900 million to EUR 150 million in revenue and EUR 84 million to EUR 108 million in EBIT. And the task for the second half is converting demand through a tight supply market. So the demand is on the books and the platform is funded and standing. And what defines the rest of 2026 is conversion, backlog into deliveries, pipeline into orders and wins and profit into cash. And that's the work we have in front of us. And that's the work this company was built for. And with that, Cathrin and I, next slide, are ready to take your questions.
Lars Nilsson
executiveAnd we have quite a few questions. Let's start with Martin supply chain, which specific component categories are most constrained? And how much revenue do you believe was delayed and deferred due to supply demand? And how much customer-funded inventories on the balance sheet and on what terms? Those are some very specific confidential questions, but let's start with component categories. Right now, I think the memories, for example, and high-level processors are constrained on allocation. We're seeing a lot of constraints on the PCB market. And we're talking about high reliability PCBs, advanced PCBs for across the type of products we built. And of course, the defense part of the PCB market where you're very much restricted to certain suppliers. So that's in general, right? I'm not going to go into detail. We have specific webcasts that we review the component market and about every 6 weeks or so. Do we want to talk about the customer-funded inventory and the balance sheet, Cathrin?
Cathrin Nylander
executiveWhat we are mentioning in the quarterly report is as well, we have deposits from customers of about EUR 125 million, which is in the same level as last quarter. In addition, of course, we have customer consigned inventory, which is not in the balance sheet, for instance, as well. And we're not -- and therefore, we don't need to mention the sums.
Lars Nilsson
executiveAnd Martin follows up with last quarter, you mentioned results would probably end up between 9.5% and 10% EBIT margin, not above 10%. Is that still accurate? I'll let you take that one again.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveYes, I will say that's a reasonable accurate statement still. It requires a lot to grow this much. And also we need to prepare for growth coming into next year, meaning that some costs will increase slightly. So I think 10% is where the high end of it.
Lars Nilsson
executiveTorbjorn has then 3 questions. The first 1 is regarding our guidance for the year and that we're at the top end and R6 is above that, obviously. Even adjusting for front loading, this appears to imply revenue above the current top end and what is preventing the formal guidance today? Well, I mean, it's the tight supply chain, right? So there's risk to increase an outlook. And at this point, we're looking all the time at what is our clear to build for the rolling 6-month horizon, what's our clear to build for a 12-month horizon, what's our clear to build for what we have on order for the next month or so. So those are numbers we're following, and we see what's possible to execute. And what we thought was possible to execute and what was actually executed. So those -- all those parameters weigh in when we say -- when we talk about our guidance forward.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveAnd when we have more clarity on that, we will be likely to reassess, but not until then. .
Lars Nilsson
executiveAnd more clarity when we report Q3, then we're into October. So that -- and then we should have a really strong picture of what it looks like.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveBut it's not about the demand. It's just about what we are able to source basically. .
Lars Nilsson
executiveWithin D&A, what extent are PCB is required to be sourced from European suppliers and European PCB capacity? And is European PCB capacity currently limited your ability to convert orders into revenue. First question for all of the defense primes in Europe, they are sourced from European suppliers. For some of the new defense tech they can be sourced either from Taiwan or South Korea probably. I'm not sure exactly where we buy everything, but the scope is a bit wider there. It depends on the classification of the product and the end customer. And often the end customer here has validated and chosen the PCB supplier also. The manufacturer, not -- the supplier can be a distributor, right? We use 2 of the large European distributors for a lot of our PCBs. And on the back end there, they would have 1, 2, 3 or 4 that are qualified for each of the programs. And is European PCB capacity currently limited to your ability or maturities into revenue? The answer is yes, right? And that's what we said in the Q1 report that we were front-end loading, so we had some possibilities to play around. But yes, there was more demand loaded. Do you have an estimate for the portion of 2026 revenue you expect to be related to data centers? Yes, and that's been very stable for us. It's about EUR 120 million with a couple of pure plays that are about 90% or so of that revenue. But we see a lot more going on, on that. And I spoke a little bit about this on the lower tier companies and customers we have, specifically within -- yes, really across all of the other market sectors except medical, right? So within connectivity, there's customers that are being driven to have a lot of short term -- not short term, but on a very short lead time horizon, constantly increasing demand and the same thing within the industrial sector. Customers that I never thought was part of data center or AI demand, now specifically stating, okay, we have an order for this or we're building this or that, and what can you do to help us pretty much immediately. So the answer was EUR 120 million. Then, Martina comes back a major good program into serial production. Is that already in R6? Yes, it is an overall outlook, yes, it is. Then comes in here with -- can you give some color on the gross margin development being slightly down year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter? Is this a reflection of current supply chain situation? Or is this a mix effect? How should we think about this going into '26, '27? Cathrin?
Cathrin Nylander
executiveWell, it's a percentage point down in Q2 from last year, that is true. But what we are following in general, is not a material share as a percentage of sales. We follow contribution margin, and that is stable.
Lars Nilsson
executiveAnd it is a mix effect most likely.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveSo we're shifting between more labor and less material or more material. I don't think you need to worry about the mix change in that sense. .
Lars Nilsson
executiveWe had a large degree here in the second quarter of new defense tech and specifically on PC behaves, right? And the material content can be very high there, shifting the gross margin down. But on contribution margin and profitability, those could even be stronger. Martin, again, R6 with even 10% flexibility points to above 1.1%. How should we view? We take -- our outlook is we stand behind our outlook, right? It could be 10%, it could be 12%, right? Who can say today. Arix says, hi, great work and fantastic results. Thank you so much, Eric. Finally, somebody appreciates us and trending well above guidance, guided the revenue but not raising guidance. Do you expect material supply constraint to unhalsecond half or just being overly cautious. Well, we expect that the supply constraints to continue and possibly worsen, right? So we've been saying this on our supply chain webcast over the past 6 months and guiding our customers towards that also. So a couple of other things we do here is we place long-term orders and push our customers to actually secure the next 12 months of inventory on strategic parts, and at this point, we consider PCBs to be a strategic component, buy what you need and put it in stock now, right? And we will store it under conditions where it's good for use for the next 3 years, if needed. And in some cases, customers are responding. In other cases, customers are declining to respond or willing to take the risk. And there is risk right? There were programs that were pushed out of Q1 and most of it delivered now in Q2, but there are some remaining that are in Q3 out of that demand. Eric, could you give some flavor on customer concentration risk in the reporting numbers rolling 12 months year-to-date '26? How do you balance building long-term customer relationships with -- how do you balance building long-term customer relationships with strategic customers and not becoming reliant on a few customers? Would be able put to understand the balance and how we deal with it? Well, I think we see now in the second quarter and through the first half of the year here that the customer concentration is coming down. We had some large part of our Q1 from 1 large customer that's coming down as the other customer bases and the other market sectors grow. So I'm comfortable with that. John says how would you assess the PCB prices are up on average? I don't have a number on that, but we're looking at -- on top of the price, right, there could be an expedite fee that you have to pay to get ahead of the line, right, to get your product quicker. So that's a part of the PCB pricing. On average, I expect component pricing and component market -- as I've been saying in other meetings this year, 5% to 7% price increase probably. So if you're below 5% to 7% on growth, then you have no growth as an EMS, but it varies on how the PCBs are designed and what substrates are part of them, what the layers inside the PCBs. But we've seen now that some manufacturers of raw material components that go into the PCBs. We had 1 large supplier of particular substrate that stopped export from the U.S., so they are restricting any export from the U.S. So that's 1 part a bit. I'm not going to comment specifically on prices, as I'm not comfortable doing that. Excluding the impact of supply chain constraints from the best and focusing purely on underlying demand, what would your guidance have looked like? Well, that's not -- we're not going into that. We have more demand. It's not a demand question at this point. So which bodes well for whatever we don't deliver this year that's going to end up in Q1 and Q2 next year.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveDo you have enough information that we've given you to calculate that yet?
Lars Nilsson
executiveBen comes in here, could you talk through the order intake and what has impacted this period?
Cathrin Nylander
executiveSo I think it's -- when it comes to order intake, I think it's important to look at organic is total order intake. So the book-to-bill for the organic is 1.05. In the quarter, we have a 0.96 in total. That means when we add on Eltek. And Eltek has had a minor adjustment in their order backlog in the quarter, meaning bringing the order impact down for the whole group. So I think you should focus on the organic, which is then EUR 292 million and 1.05. Okay.
Lars Nilsson
executiveBento, what extent and the price increases and component pass-through contributing to growth. so far, not much, right? We did a deep dive into this in the beginning of June and looked at pricing last year on the same type of products versus our -- cost last year versus cost this year. And on the whole, there's not a lot of notable difference. On the other hand, right, there could be variances in the products. There could have been more labor in them last year. Now, there's more material in them. So from a sales price, it's not been significant, at least not year-to-date for the first 6 months. But again, we're looking at -- we -- before anybody took vacation here in Europe, the deadline was June 30 to make sure that Q3 pricing is all adjusted for whatever we see in Q3. So we'll have a better number as we exit Q3 and we can look at those numbers what has to happen on the pricing. But again, my expectation is probably 5% to 7% when we look at the year. But that's more of a gut feeling right now than based on exactly what we see when we run our internal reports. How much of your organic growth would you assess them from prebuying in the quarter, prebuying components or customers prebuying? Pre-buying components and selling them in consignment is not part of our revenue. We never book component transactions into revenue.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveCustomer prebuying. I don't think ... .
Lars Nilsson
executiveBut if it's customer prebuying, it could be some of the quick drop in orders we've seen with customers on very short lead time on, but it's insignificant on the total. It could be significant for some sites where specifically, we saw a lot of drop in orders in our Asian facilities. But again, they grew, what, 25% versus last year, and that's all nondefense, right? So it is the underlying other market sectors, medical, connectivity and industry basically. A little bit of electrification also into those numbers. So they grew 25%, maybe 5% of that growth was a quick drop in orders. But it -- so that could have been prebuying, who's to say. I don't know.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveFrom a total point of view, the number won't affect anything.
Lars Nilsson
executiveThat is it, my friends. We don't have any more questions, and I wish everybody a really, really nice summer. I know I'm going to enjoy it for a few weeks here before we pick up the pieces and tackle the rest of Q3. Thanks.
Cathrin Nylander
executiveThank you. Happy summer.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Kitron ASA transcript — plus 246,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Kitron ASA earnings transcripts and 246,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.