Lear Corporation (LEA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 4, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Discretionary Automobile Components conference_presentation 32 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

James Picariello

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our fireside chat with Lear. My name is James Picariello. I cover the auto space at KeyBanc. Very pleased to have Lear's CEO, Ray Scott; and CFO, Jason Cardew, with us today. Thank you guys for the time. Really appreciate it. I want to jump right in. But before we kick things off, just everyone out there. Please feel free to submit any questions you have through the Q&A browser at the bottom of your screen, and we'll get to as many of those as we can. So yes, to start, Ray, would you like to maybe provide any general industry or overview comments based on what you're seeing thus far?

Raymond Scott

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks, James. Good morning, everyone. It's an honor to be here. Real quick. Obviously, there's some short-term pressure. I think everyone knows. I won't belabor the microchip situation and how it's impacting the overall industry. And it will be more of a short-term issue. I do think some of the chip concerns will be primarily impacting the second quarter. However, I do think in the third and fourth quarter, we'll still be managing, but the quarters will be significantly better. With that said, we're very bullish on the industry as a whole. We do believe that the volume trajectory of growth will increase. And Lear is very well positioned in both business segments. In Seating, we've done a remarkable job. I couldn't be more proud of the team and the sustainability. It's a very challenging 12 months, and the robustness of our seat business continues to prove that it's a great business. And that comes with a lot of capital investment, well over 10 years of investing in that business and really focusing on vertical integration and positioning ourselves very well. The growth trajectory, we believe, we're very confident will continue to grow 4 percentage points over market. And E-Systems, equally as exciting. With the electrification story, how we're positioned in power electronics. We're very uniquely positioned with power distribution and power electronics. So well positioned for growth in that area. And we're seeing nice growth within our connectors business. And so the story that we've talked about as far as growing that business, really driving the margin profile to double-digit, a 10% profile is in place. We do have, like I said, some short-term headwinds, particularly around E-Systems in the second quarter. But very, very bullish on the long-term perspective around electrification and engineered components. So that's really the story where we're at, and we look forward to answering some of the questions.

James Picariello

analyst
#3

Yes. Yes. A lot to dig into. I guess, first off, I mean, you mentioned the chip shortage. There are plenty of OEM downtime announcements to point to but we did just get GM's very positive announcement yesterday morning. So I mean, the second quarter is slated to be the most challenged. We're 2 months in. How are things trending from Lear's standpoint?

Jason Cardew

executive
#4

Yes. Certainly, the second quarter has been a challenge, never been as challenging as we expected, maybe a little bit more so even. And first of all, I want to just compliment the operating team. It's really well seen in E-Systems. They've done a remarkable job of navigating through this challenging time. And as Ray said, the demand setup is fantastic, I think, for industry volumes once we get through this. But the second quarter when we guided to that, when we issued our guidance on the first quarter earnings call, we talked about sequential revenue being down about 9% at the midpoint from the first quarter, second quarter with a range of down 7% to down 11%. As we sit here today and there's still 4 weeks to go, but we have a pretty good line of sight through the end of the quarter, I think we're going to be down about 10% sequentially. So sort of in between the midpoint and the low end of the range. If you do the math on that, revenue would be down about $550 million. But the story is very different in both segments. In Seating, we have, just given the mix of customers there, we're seeing Seating revenue down about 8% sequentially and E-Systems down 16% to 17%. And I think everyone is aware that Ford is our largest customer in E-Systems, and they've been pretty transparent about their production cuts in the second quarter. So that's had a meaningful impact on E-Systems in particular. And if you think about the operating earnings side of the outlook, if you look at our decrementals historically, 15% to 20% in Seating and 25% to 30% in E-Systems, you can get pretty close to where we see the quarter shaking out. Looking beyond the second quarter into Q3. As Ray mentioned, it's certainly going to be better than the second quarter. It's still going to be challenging. The fourth quarter is going to be better than the third quarter. Our visibility into the second half of the year is improving. And we still feel very confident in the full year outlook that we provided on the first quarter earnings call.

James Picariello

analyst
#5

Okay. Great. That's super helpful. A lot of great detail there. I guess focusing on seating and maybe just the top line. The growth over market this year is well above what you're targeting over the midterm. So we certainly have the favorable dynamic of content, just favorable program mix, right? The content mix is strong. What else is there -- what else is kind of driving that outgrowth within Seating? And I've gotten the question, we all have the question, does this favorable content mix this year pose a major headwind, some form of a headwind next year as the full slate of models are back in production? How should we be thinking about that?

Raymond Scott

executive
#6

Yes. I think that the -- what drove the first quarter growth over market in Seating was really the strength that GM full-size trucks and SUVs in our luxury platforms in North America, Europe and in Asia. And I think we have 45% of the luxury market. It's an important part of our seat business. And I see that remaining strong into next year. I don't see that as a headwind, maybe -- or a tailwind. But I do see the GM full-size truck and SUV production continuing to be a tailwind. GM's talked about adding a facility in Oshawa to produce additional trucks. So I think we're going to see higher volume year-over-year, and that will be a growth over market tailwind in our Seating business, at least through 2022. And so I think we're a couple of points above our 4 points of growth over market target in that business this year. I think we're at or above the target next year and then maybe moderating a bit after that back in line with our historical 4 points of growth above market.

James Picariello

analyst
#7

Got it. And then on E-Systems, right, basically the inverse, right? I mean -- and you already alluded to many of these points. But growth over market is going to trend below what you would be targeting over the midterm. Clearly, the chip shortage is in play. And so my question there is, is Lear -- is Lear E-Systems having trouble procuring the chips that you need? Or is it just your more so your OEM customer exposure and their own chip exposure?

Raymond Scott

executive
#8

Yes. It's -- the vast majority of that's a result of our customer production disruptions. Our electronics business is a relatively small part of the business overall. And we talked about it on the first quarter earnings call. We made it through the first quarter and through that point in time without any disruptions to our customers. I think everyone is faced with constraints. It's a very real issue for all suppliers in that space. But the driver of the lower production volumes and the lower growth over market is a result of our customer production downtime, particularly again with Ford. Ford is a really important customer of ours, and we love our business with Ford. But we are a little bit overexposed there. It's 27% of our revenue last year. This year, it was 35%. If you go back 5 years and if we look out 5 years, we think it's more like 20%. So we continue to improve the customer diversification in that segment. And in addition to that, we -- within the forward book of business that we have in E-Systems, we've been overexposed to the C2 platform. It's a great high-volume platform, but we have a growing business on the F-150. We had some new business that launched the battery cable of the F-150 last year. We have the Mustang Mach-E low-voltage wire business and so our mix of business is improving within the Ford portfolio as well. And I think that's a great setup going into next year. And I think we'll see some additional growth above market. In E-Systems next year, just as you see the reversal of those platforms that have been hit particularly hard this year, and you look at inventory levels on a lot of those vehicle lines, it's a nice setup for a big volume recovery next year.

James Picariello

analyst
#9

Yes. No. I mean that's all -- those are all good green indicators. How about if we kind of dig into the margin side of things. I mean, obviously, you just gave great second quarter color. You feel good about your full year guidance. But if we dig into maybe the segments, as of last quarter's conference call, both segments should -- it seems as though should get to a solid normalized run rate by the fourth quarter, right? So as we think about next year and beyond, what is the right trajectory to be -- to have in mind for Seating and E-Systems? Where do we kind of -- where should we land for the full year this year? And should we really be using that fourth quarter as a good trajectory from there?

Raymond Scott

executive
#10

Yes. I think the fourth quarter exit rate will be a good indicator of what we can do with both business segments next year. We're anticipating the fourth quarter volumes to be similar to the first quarter of this year in terms of the level of disruption that's still taking place. And in that environment, given the current commodity environment, we think we can run seating between 7.5% and 8% in the fourth quarter. And E-Systems a little wider range, 7% to 8%, just depends more on the timing of the commercial recovery and some of the commodity inflation. But I think that's the right run rate for both businesses as we look at next year. And we're expecting 2022 volumes to be higher certainly than this year. I think IHS is projecting an 8% increase next year. We may be a little less bullish than that. But certainly, 5% is a reasonable target. And if we see a 5% increase in industry volumes in '22 versus this year, then I think both businesses can be at or around that 8% operating margin range.

James Picariello

analyst
#11

Yes. I won't -- I'm not going to try to pin you down to your 2022 industry production outlook. But given how depleted the inventory levels are in North America, right, we got the SAAR trending in that 17 million to 18 million range, which was really inconceivable 9 months ago. I mean, why would industry production only be up 5% next year if you have strong demand on top of the need to get inventory levels back up? I mean that's specific to North America, but I think that's also probably playing out in Europe. So yes, maybe we could just -- if you don't mind, digging into the regional kind of thoughts there.

Raymond Scott

executive
#12

Yes. So I think North America has certainly been hit hardest by the production disruptions and the chip shortage. So I can see North America doing considerably better than that. I think that if you look at China and Europe, there's maybe less room for volume growth year-over-year, and that sort of balances out the 5% that I referred to. And it's early and lots of things can change between now and the end of the year. But I do see a very robust growth opportunity in North America heading into next year. As you mentioned, the SAAR is 18.5 2 months ago and 17 again in month of May, is a fantastic setup. I think inventory levels are down to 1.5 million units. I don't know that they've ever been that low. So the combination of demand and low inventory levels is a great setup heading into next year.

James Picariello

analyst
#13

Yes, for sure. Okay. Higher level per seating. I mean by objective measures, right, Lear has the best run seating business globally. Others compare their performance to yours as kind of the industry benchmark. So can you discuss the maybe the trajectory of Lear's market share over the last several years? Where you want to take it 5 and 10 years from now to start?

Raymond Scott

executive
#14

Yes. Yes. Thanks, James. And we have historically done a really nice job of growing that business. If you just think over the last 5 years, we've grown our market share from approximately 18% to 23% today. And we look at that business, and we've been investing in that business for a long time. And I think even historically, if you go back even further, we've been able to outgrow the market by 4 percentage points. And so we're very confident, not just historically what we've been able to do, but I think we're even in a better position as we look forward. Over the last 2 years, we've won approximately net conquest wins of $1 billion. And this year, we are quoting between $300 million and $700 million of potential conquest wins. I think it will be more reflective of what we saw 2 years ago, around $300 million. But nonetheless, good opportunities for us to grow our business. I think in addition to how we look at JIT, we've always looked at our business, and I think it's been in an indicator of how we run the business on return on investment. And that really drives what is the outcome, which is margin. And so each one of our different businesses look a little bit differently. JIT, we can really generate a nice return on investment at a 5 to 6 percentage points as far as margin. Other parts of our business, if we're more vertically integrated within the award of a JIT business can be higher. And obviously, where we're focused, and we've talked about it quite a bit, is on priceable features. We think driving innovation and technology that's embedded into a modular concept within the seat creates a significant value for our customers. And in some respects, is agnostic to JIT, meaning, that we can continue to grow our business on the component side and still remain focused and competitive on the JIT side of the business. And so we have aspirational goals to hit 20% market share. But I think it's going to be a combination of vertical integration, the JIT business and new technologies and innovation. And something that we're really excited about when I talk about technology and innovation, and we've been spending a tremendous amount of effort over the last 5 years on intuitive seating, smart seats, thermal comfort seats, I think ConfigurE+ is a great example of what we're talking about. It's a design and engineered value proposition for our customer that allows the seat to be powered on rails. It's -- we own the patents, so it's very unique to Lear Corporation, but gives our customers an incredible flexibility. You can move consoles fore-and-aft. You can add power and signal 2 different components within the vehicle, including seats. You have ultimate flexibility of being able to pull the seats out and reversing the seats for a number of different storage purposes and also flexibility of cargo and space within -- in the vehicle. And right now, we're launching with Volkswagen. It's going into production. And over the next several years, we'll be launching with Ford Motor Company, and it will represent about $100 million of business. But the significance of that type of technology innovation is drawing significant interest from all kinds of customers. It's almost -- once it goes into production, and it's offered as an option or feature, other OEs are looking and saying, "I have to really have that feature within my vehicle," because it is so unique. And that concept isn't limited to just passenger vehicles. What we're doing is we're looking at last-mile delivery. It sets up perfect for cargo, like I mentioned, racking systems, other utilities within the vehicle. So when I talk about -- yes, we're doing a really nice job, we're going to continue to invest in capital, in investment within our people to drive operational excellence within our plans for the seat business. But there's a number of different very innovative ways that we can continue to grow our business with intuitive seating, thermal comfort, ConfigurE+. And so yes, I couldn't -- listen, we're very confident in our growth perspectives within seat. I think we've done a nice job historically. I think the robustness of margins that we've been able to prove that it is something that we can maintain during very challenging times has been evident over the last 12 months. And we're going to continue to work at our efficiencies within our plants, but more importantly, how we differentiate our seat business model longer term to grow the business.

James Picariello

analyst
#15

A lot of great color there. One follow-up. Is there any common thread to the type of conquest awards you've been able to win? Meaning, do those -- do you win a new customer relationship through the JIT only piece first? And then you have to kind of earn your right into a complete seat vertical integration type of relationship? Or not necessarily because it kind of just run the gamut?

Raymond Scott

executive
#16

Yes. It depends on the customer, and it could be very independent. I will say this. I think that why we have so much confidence in the continuation of growth is when you have capabilities and you have the vertical integration and technology and innovation, we're in the studios very early. We're looking at solutions, like I just mentioned with ConfigurE+. We're into the studios with the claims, and we're talking about different applications, which then leads to other conversations with other components or even the ability to quote the JIT business. So I think it depends on the customer. I'll give you an example like in China. We've done a really nice job of growing with Western customers. And now the domestics are really picking up because of our technology with ConfigurE+. They find it as a really interesting value proposition for them. And that puts us in a nice position to quote the JIT business that would be a part of that type of RFQ or request for quote. And so it depends on the customer. It does depend on the region. But having the broad breadth of capabilities, including our leading position within operational excellence and what we do for our customers on the JIT side, down to having very unique innovation and technology, gives us, I believe, a unique advantage to grow depending on where the customers are looking.

James Picariello

analyst
#17

That's super helpful. You mentioned China. A major competitor of yours, as we all know, just announced a significant realignment in China. What doors potentially open up for Lear from this? The majority of -- is the majority of your Seating business in China through your JVs? Or is it mainly consolidated? And is there an opportunity to further consolidate those businesses? Or is part of the M&A strategy maybe to go up to the China market? Curious your thoughts on...

Raymond Scott

executive
#18

Yes. All good questions. I'll first start with the split of the partnership between Yanfeng and Adient. And obviously, that was a very powerful combination within China. And they had a big percentage of the market share within China. The split between those 2 companies, I mean, I look at it as being very positive for Lear. Obviously, each company is going to have to scale up. They're going to have to hire in regards to how they were structured, and I'm not going to assume what they had or didn't have. But I would think that they're going to have to add additional structure, layers of resources, capital, et cetera. So the combination was something that was a very strong partnership within China. But now that split has really opened the market up, in my perspective, as far as -- it's more of an equally distributed split between Lear Corporation, Adient and Yanfeng. And they're going to have to compete against each other, which we've had to compete against both of them independently for a long time. Now they're going to have to compete against each other. And they obviously know each other very well. So that's going to make it for an interesting scenario going forward. But that aside, Lear has really positioned themselves well in China. I mentioned earlier that we've done a really nice job, not only of our growth with Western OEs, but the domestic OEs. And I think the offerings that we have with vertical integration, with our leather, textiles, structures, ConfigurE+ technology innovation is very unique. And yet I think in respect to acquisitions, we absolutely would like to continue looking at acquisitions that would strengthen our position in China. But I think equally and probably more importantly, acquisitions within our seat business that are centered around priceable features, comfort features, those type of things, I think, are setting up very well for Lear Corporation as we continue to integrate innovation and technology within a modular concept that not only creates, like I said, value for Lear, but value for our customers. Yes. Jason, if you want to...

Jason Cardew

executive
#19

Yes. In terms of the structure of our business in China. On the JIT business, it's largely through joint ventures. And I don't know the exact percentage, but roughly 50-50 Lear-controlled versus partner-controlled. And I do see an opportunity to take control of additional joint ventures there and consolidate that business. We're actively evaluating that. We've done that in the past over time, and that's worked to our benefit. Our component plants are all wholly-owned entities. So leather, fabric, structures are all wholly-owned entities for us.

James Picariello

analyst
#20

Got it. I probably want to spend the rest of the time on E-Systems. The company hosted a very insightful E-Systems day back in late March. You shared 2025 targets, right, $7.5 billion in revenue by 2025, 10% operating margins. In my view, certainly, electrification leads to the secular story for the segment getting to $1 billion by that time frame. I think you have about $725 million already booked based on your last slide deck that you shared. So can you walk us through the significant content opportunities for Lear around electrification, right? Because there's -- folks are -- have various familiarity with the business and just some of the key programs that you've already won.

Raymond Scott

executive
#21

Yes. It's -- obviously, that business is very dynamic. And we've spent a tremendous amount of time over the last several years really studying the market and studying our customers and studying the future opportunities where we fit. And we've done an outstanding job in the -- Carl Esposito, who's leading that group, came from Honeywell, has done a nice job building one heck of a team around him. And I think it starts with the team. And we've positioned ourselves, and we've talked about it, we are very uniquely positioned in power electronics and power distribution as far as harnesses and Ts and Cs. We have a very unique position there. And where we're focused, and I think this is important, we're not trying to be everything to everybody. I mean there's a lot of players out there trying to do a lot of different things within the architecture. We're focused on integrated power modules, onboard chargers, DC-DC converters, battery disconnect units and battery management systems. And we've done a nice job, when we talk about creating value for our customers and for Lear, focusing on engineered components. And I think a perfect example of that is our battery disconnect unit that's launching with the GMC Hummer. And what we believe is that by selectively looking at platforms where we can appropriately scale components across multiple vehicles within a customer is a unique position. And so right now, it's about executing and delivering from a quality perspective and from a price perspective, but execute that program so that you're integrated into a modular, or battery pack in this case, and you put yourself in really a position of last rights. And meaning, that if you do what you have to do as far as executing the program, it's going to further enhance your ability to win the next-generation or the next platform of business, and that's exactly what we're focused on. Another one, I think, is a great example, and we've talked about that, is our ability. We have some incredible power to scale ratios and grounding capabilities within our connectors business. And we won, and we compete against all the mega tiers in respect to head-to-head competition. We won the Volkswagen main battery connection or the plugboard for the Volkswagen MEB platform. And we believe that, obviously, winning that program is not just significant for today, but over the next several years from now until 2026, that's almost 4 million vehicles that, that will go on. So significantly has its own ability to scale and drive value longer term. And so we are being very selective. There's other areas, traction inverters and things that we -- we're going to -- we're not going to emphasize. We think there's other areas that we can participate and be very successful and win business. And that's exactly what we're doing. I see the traction the team's getting from the margin perspective, but also the traction that they're gaining with growth has been very, very impressive.

James Picariello

analyst
#22

Well, that's really helpful. I mean on the topic of scale. I mean E-Systems for Lear was never the largest player within the products that you're in, right, whether it's wire harnesses, electronics, T and Cs. So does scale matter even less so now as the industry shifts toward electrification? Or is it a scale game and you intend to fully compete on that level? How should we be thinking about that?

Raymond Scott

executive
#23

Yes. I think scale is one factor. I think there's a lot of factors, given the dynamics, as I mentioned earlier, of what's going on with the architectures. I think historically, if you look at a traditional architecture, there was a lot of similarities where you could take a gateway or a TCU and scale that across multiple platforms and use the hardware and software across customers. What I'm seeing is customers today are very unique. Their architectures are, in some respects, unique to their own platforms. And so when I think of scale, I think it's more in the terms that I mentioned earlier. There are scalable components across customers like engineering. We can reuse engineering, obviously, with technology innovation that we could use across platforms. Some elements of our hardware can be scalable. But the battery disconnect, for example, that I'm talking about is very unique, very complex engineered component that's integrated into a battery module for General Motors. And so those components, when we think of scale, we think across and why we're so selective with our customers, is how successful would this platform be? Will this platform be scalable across multiple vehicle lines? And how is the customer looking at that particular component longer term? And so like I said, scale is one aspect, I think, today. I think there's a lot of other aspects that can create a competitiveness. And we are winning those programs today. It's very unique platforms, but we are focused more on the longer-term approach on how we're going to distribute our capital and engineering dollars to a particular platform.

James Picariello

analyst
#24

Got it. And just one point of clarification. The battery disconnect award with GM, is that across the entire Ultium platform? Or is it specific to EV trucks and like commercial -- like commercial vehicles? How should we be thinking about that platform?

Raymond Scott

executive
#25

So yes, the way we're describing it right now is we're talking about specifically to the Hummer truck. Now...

Jason Cardew

executive
#26

So that design is used on the whole battery electric truck platform, the BET platform. The only thing that's been formally awarded is the GMC Hummer, the initial launch vehicle. But that battery pack and the BDU that we've designed for that will be used across that whole platform. Now as Ray said, it's essentially a last right of refusal in that if we execute on cost, engineering, manufacturing, then we put ourselves in a very strong position to win that whole BET platform over time as it's sourced.

Raymond Scott

executive
#27

But we don't want to get ahead of ourselves. We're somewhat superstitious in that we don't want to -- we have to execute right now, but we do believe that by executing and delivering to GM's expectations that we have put ourselves in a really good position to take that across multiple platforms.

James Picariello

analyst
#28

Yes. I'm just going to run a minute over because I think we should end with this question. Given how strong Lear's balance sheet and free cash flow profile is, I mean, how should we be thinking about cap allocation, returning excess cash to shareholders from here?

Jason Cardew

executive
#29

Yes. So our priorities haven't changed at all, James. We're focused first on capital expenditures for our core businesses, tuck-in acquisitions and then returning excess cash to shareholders. We're committed to doing that. We've kind of just gotten back into share repurchases a little bit here in the second quarter at a low level. And we've restored a portion of the dividend that we had in place pre-COVID. And I think with a little bit more clarity on industry production volumes, we look to bring that back more fully. We're in discussions with our Board on that topic and expect to be in a position to do that in the near term. So...

James Picariello

analyst
#30

Got it. Well, Ray and Jason, thank you guys so much. This was really great.

Jason Cardew

executive
#31

Yes. Thank you, James.

Raymond Scott

executive
#32

Yes. Thank you. Appreciate your time today.

Jason Cardew

executive
#33

Take care.

James Picariello

analyst
#34

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Lear Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Lear Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.