LG Chem, Ltd. (A051910) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 31, 2022

Korea Exchange KR Materials Chemicals earnings 53 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Hyun-suk Yoon

executive
#1

[Interpreted] Good afternoon. We will now start LG Chem's 2022 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. This is Hyun-Suk Yoon, Head of IR at LG Chem. Thank you for taking interest in LG Chem and joining this call despite your busy schedules. We will begin with the brief introduction of 2022 Q3 earnings performance, followed by the CFO presentation, highlighting the company's earnings results, then a Q&A session. The presentations will be interpreted simultaneously while the Q&A will be interpreted consecutively. The material presented during this conference call can be viewed by those with web access. It is also available for download from our corporate website. Let's begin today's call with the introduction of the management team. We have CFO, Dong Seok Cha; Yeong Suk Lee from Business Planning; [ Ki-Dap Young ] from Petrochemicals; Young Suk Lee from Advanced Materials; and Jin-Soo Park from Life Sciences. Let's begin with the business performance. On Page 3, consolidated sales and P&L. Q3 sales grew by 34% Y-o-Y and 16% Q-o-Q to KRW 14.178 trillion to record the highest ever quarterly sales for 4 consecutive quarters. Operating profit was KRW 901 billion, and OP margin was 6.4%. Next page is a summary of our earnings performance, excluding LG Energy Solution. Sales was KRW 8.316 trillion, a slight increase the previous quarter, and operating profit was KRW 450 billion. Next, Page 5 is our consolidated financial status. As of the end of the third quarter 2022, assets were around KRW 69.6 trillion. Liabilities were around KRW 31 trillion and capital was around KRW 38.7 trillion. Net asset value per share was KRW 416,000. Next, earnings by business division. Page 6, Petrochemical division. 2022 Q3 sales was KRW 5.493 trillion, operating profit was KRW 93 billion and operating margin was 1.7%. With the supply increase in petrochemical industries, coupled with recession from the global inflation, the rapid deterioration of the market environment led to a fall in sales and profitability on quarter. Particularly, a significant tightening in the spreads of downstreams are key products such as PVC and ABS, which have been posting solid profits. However, high value-add premium products, such as POE and SAP with relatively solid demand, continue to generate robust profitability. Next is Advanced Materials. In Q3, Advanced Materials sales was KRW 2.582 trillion, a 30% increase Q-o-Q, and operating profit was KRW 416 billion. With the deterioration in the downstream IT market, sales and profits fell for the IT materials. However, for battery materials and cathodes, in particular, increase in ASPs and shipment backed by the rising metal prices led to sales growing around 60% compared to the previous quarter. Next, Life Sciences. In Q3, sales was KRW 225 billion, operating profit was KRW 6 billion and OP margin was 2.6%. Sales increase for key products such as the growth hormones. However, profitability fell due to the delay in the recovery of aesthetics business from the prolonged COVID lockdown in China and an increase in R&D investment for full-fledged clinical trials for global new drugs. Next, Farm Hannong. Q3 sales was KRW 157 billion and operating loss was KRW 3 billion. With the seasonality in the second half, the business has posted negative earnings. However, sales and profitability improved Y-o-Y with the increase in sales of crop protection products at home and abroad, including greater exports of Terrad'or. Lastly, Energy Solutions. On October 26, Energy Solutions presented their performance in detail during its earnings release call, however, we will briefly present the earnings here. In Q3, Energy Solutions sales was KRW 7.648 trillion. Operating profit was KRW 522 billion and OP margin was 6.8%. The company recorded the highest quarterly sales backed by the increase in shipments, thanks to the greater demand from key OEM customers in Europe and North America and consequently with economies of scale and higher ASPs from rising metal prices. Profitability also improved. And on this note, we will conclude the Q2 -- Q3 earnings presentation and invite CFO, Dong-Seok Cha, to present the highlights of the company's earnings performance.

Dong Seok Cha

executive
#2

[Interpreted] Good afternoon. This is Dong-Seok Cha, CFO of LG Chem. I want to thank all of you for joining us today and taking a great interest in LG Chem's earnings release despite your busy schedule. As stated regarding the Q3 earnings, just to summarize, profitability fell due to the full-fledged downcycle in the Petrochem industry on the back of the global recession. However, we were able to raise the growth and profitability in Advanced Materials and Energy Solutions. And on a consolidated basis, profit had slightly increased compared to the second quarter. This was possible because we built a more stable business portfolio through the rapid business expansion of the company's new growth drivers. In the fourth quarter, which is going to be increasingly difficult to forecast, we will be facing a challenging business environment and, in particular, the cycle continues in the Petrochem business. However, recently, ASP's key products are stabilizing, Likewise, for feedstock prices, and thus, additional weakening of the market conditions is likely to be limited. Therefore, we forecast that Petrochem's market condition will bottom out in the fourth quarter. In case of cathodes, which is the foundation for Advanced Materials, we forecast that ASP will fall due to a more downward stabilization of metal prices and thus for the next 1 to 2 quarters. Maintaining such very high margin that we experienced previously may be somewhat difficult. However, when we look at shipments, they continue to increase, led by the electric vehicle market, and thus, we will further increase the business profit through continued business expansion. Dear investors, as mentioned earlier, uncertain macroeconomic environment at home and abroad continues to persist. The company will continue to maintain competitiveness through creating more differentiated and increased customer value and through thorough supply chain management, and also thoroughly manage cash flow through more prudent investment execution and working capital management. On the other hand, for the continued growth of LG Chem, we will also proceed on track in investing and fostering the top 3 growth engines for the company. Through the recently announced acquisition of AVEO, we believe we can secure a strong foundation and capability in the global new drug business. And we are in the final stages of completing the North America cathode capacity expansion plan to expand the battery material business, and we will be able to communicate the plan shortly to you. Dear investors, under continued adversities, everyone's share at LG Chem will endeavor to identify opportunities and create bigger growth. And I would like to ask for your strong and continued support. Thank you.

Hyun-suk Yoon

executive
#3

Next, we will begin the Q&A session. To give more opportunities to ask questions, we will limit 2 questions per person.

Operator

operator
#4

[Interpreted] [Operator Instructions] So the first question is from the line of Young Suk Shin from Morgan Stanley.

Young Shin

analyst
#5

[Interpreted] There are 2 questions that I would like to ask you. First is about your overall Petrochemicals business. I do believe that the CFO just now has talked about the market backdrop and saying that the market is challenging. However, there was mention that there should be a gradual improvement in place. So the question that I would like to ask is how much of an improvement do you think that it would be possible? And in addition to that, in terms of the market actually showing a rebound in full, when do we expect that, that would be able to take place? The second question that I would like to ask you is, I guess, about news that the overall market has been waiting for, and that would be on the cathode side of your business. When would we be able to know about your updated capacity expansion plans or maybe expansion into the U.S?

Unknown Executive

executive
#6

[Interpreted] Yes, maybe I can take your first question, which would be about the overall petrochemical market outlook. I do believe that this is a question I can address by talking about the overall utilization rate. So if we look at one of the main indicators, which would be the utilization for excellent products, right now, it is running at around 80%. So it is true that within the market as a whole, there has been some adjustment in the overall utilization. And if we take into consideration the supply and demand dynamics within the overall market and the market backdrop, we actually believe that this is a trend that will continue into next year at a similar level. On the downstream side, due to the overall supply demand dynamics and also the difference in competitiveness by each of the different companies, we do think that there could be some differences into the experience that each company has. And in the case of our overall situation, if we were to look at the situation -- sorry, for the more common PO products and for some other -- with the exception of those areas, we do believe that the overall utilization would be at around 90%, which would be more at the normal levels. However, because of the global nature of our overall business and the uncertainties that we see within the overall economic backdrop, we are a bit cautious about next year. Taking into consideration the overall oil price levels and also the demand that we see within the market, we do think that the possibility of there being a further deterioration from the current situation would be a bit limited. And as we pass through the first half of 2023, we do think that we will be able to experience an overall improvement within the market.

Unknown Executive

executive
#7

[Interpreted] So maybe I can talk about your second question, which would be the overall capacity expansion plans that we would see in North America. So if we look at North America, it is true that we are looking at the possibility of expanding our capacity and take into consideration the overall metal sourcing, also the lack or availability of land and also the sales pricing and the metal sourcing possibilities and also the overall situation at our customer side. We do need to take various -- a wide variety of elements into consideration before we are able to come up with our final conclusion. So right now, we are in the final stages of discussions with our customers about the overall situation. So targeting the year 2025 in terms of the overall capacity expansion, as of now, we are looking into the environmental-related areas in terms of what would be the overall construction environment, what the setup is required and what other elements we need to have in place. At the same time, because the Inflation Reduction Act has been announced within the U.S., we do believe that there is an increase in overall need for localization of the various materials. So right now, we have been approached by a multiple number of OEMs and sell manufacturers about what our schedule will be going forward and what type of capacity or size we would be able to produce. So as a result of that, versus the initial plans that we had for our capacity expansion, we do believe that there could be possible to be an upside in terms of the overall plans.

Operator

operator
#8

[Interpreted] The next question is from the line of Hyunryul Cho from Samsung Securities.

Hyunryul Cho

analyst
#9

[Interpreted] There are 2 questions that I would like to ask you. First, on the cash flow side, you did discuss that in general that, overall, the overall metal prices have been stabilizing at a lower level. So as a result of that, you did think that the overall profitability and also sales prices in this area may follow suit. However, if we were to look at the overall direction of profit going forward, what type of expectation should we have on that side? In addition to that, if you look at your position versus where your competitors sit, I do believe that one of the benefits you enjoy is that you're able to directly source your metals. So as a result of that, how much increase in profitability or at what level do you think you would be able to enjoy because of this overall advantage? The second question that I would like to ask you is that since the IRA has been announced in terms of your overall strategy for your business over the mid- to long term, has there been any changes in that direction?

Unknown Executive

executive
#10

[Interpreted] So maybe I can talk about the first question. With regards to the overall profitability trends that we have seen, it is true that, in terms of the recent trends for metal prices, we have seen some moderation. And going into the fourth quarter, because of the overall situation, we do think that a lot of the inventory has been depleted and we will not see a significant increase in the overall performance. In addition to that, at the customer level, we do see that for inventory that they are moderating and somewhat managing the overall customer inventory for the end of the year. So we do think that there is a possibility that the overall shipment volume will decrease as a result of that. So as a result of that, on the fourth quarter basis, on a Q-o-Q basis, we do see that there will be a slight softening in the overall situation. For metal sourcing, of course, we are interested in making equity investments into the metal side. However, how much that would actually represent in terms of improvement is difficult to specify in terms an absolute number. But that have been said, within the overall cost that goes into the cathode, the metal does account for a large portion. So as a result of that, whether it be on the lithium side or whether it be on the metal side, through various joint venture arrangements and also partnerships, this is something that we are interested in putting in place so that in terms of the sourcing, we can enjoy a more stable sourcing base, and this is something that we do want to expand going forward.

Unknown Executive

executive
#11

[Interpreted] Maybe I can address your second question about after the IRA has been introduced, whether there is a difference in our overall strategy. So if we look at the overall details for the IRA in itself, we do think that it will take a bit more time. So we would have to be close to the year for us to know what the details will incur with regards to the requirements. But it is true that with regards to the overall demand, we have seen an increase in demand. In addition -- so as a result of that, for our overall strategy, we do want to continue on the road that we have for building out a global production base. And in addition to that, on the IRA side, because this is newly in place for metal sourcing, we do want to ensure that we can localize metal sourcing more. So as a result of that, we are trying to increase our overall relationships and volumes with suppliers from North America and also Australia, which would be FTA, countries that are also -- countries that have an FTA with the U.S. In addition to that, to ensure that on the consumer side that they would be eligible for the subsidies that are provided, we are going to continue to source our overall cathodes from, again, from FTA countries and, at the same time, continue with the overall cooperations that we have with other partners to ensure that we can meet all of the requirements that we have for local content. However, once again, for the more detailed discussions about what we need to do, we would have to have more details about the final details related to the IRA regulations and what the requirements would be. And once that is in place, of course, we will do as much as possible to try to satisfy those conditions. So therefore, we want to confirm what the progress is.

Operator

operator
#12

[Interpreted] The next question is from the line of Jin Ho Lee from Mirae Asset Securities.

Jin Ho Lee

analyst
#13

[Interpreted] There are 2 questions that I would like to ask about your Petrochemicals business. The first is about the turnarounds that have been taking place. I do understand that recently within the third quarter, there has been some maintenance activity, and as a result of that, also some adjustments in the overall utilization have been taking place. If we were to go into the fourth quarter, I understand that there is a TA slated for your Yeosu plant. So if you could talk about what that actually would be and what impact that would have on your P&L that would be appreciated. The second question that I would like to ask you is about your mid- to long-term capacity plans or investment plans and capacity for your Petrochemicals business. I do understand that for the short term, there is no plans to invest. However, as the market does improve and the backdrop would improve. What would be your mid- to long-term capacity investment plans? And so if you could update that for us, that would be appreciated.

Unknown Executive

executive
#14

[Interpreted] Yes, to address your question about the overall TAs and the impact of that, as you have mentioned during your question, from the end of September to the beginning of December, we are going through a turnaround of our overall Yeosu complex. And in addition to that, on the downstream side, as we complete that maintenance one by one, we will also do maintenance for the downstream facilities that we have. In addition to that, on a unit factory basis, there also is a concentration of maintenance is scheduled for the fourth quarter. So as a result of that, in terms of the overall profit impact, we do think that in the fourth quarter, it would represent KRW 130 billion. And if we take into consideration some of the impact that was recognized into the third quarter from the turnarounds as a whole, the overall impact would be KRW 180 billion. So next, maybe I can talk about our mental long-term investment direction. Even though the overall market backdrop right now is not in a good situation, that does not mean that for the future and investments that we require, for example, for our new growth drivers and also in the areas of sustainability that we would be slowing down the investment plans that we have. In addition to that, the resources that are required to be inputted to build out our portfolio on a regional level and also in a product level is also something that we are not planning to curve down. If we look at the overall direction of our investments going forward, over the shorter-term period, we do believe that for the higher growth areas and also areas in which we would be able to generate a higher cash return, so for example, for the solar PV, POEs and also for -- on the battery side, CNTs and also on the semiconductor side, IPA, these are areas that we want to continue to grow and also invest into. And then over the mid- to longer term, I think that the overall stance would be that we would focus on the technology that is available and also the various raw materials that are available and look into the areas of bio and also recycling because we do believe that these are areas that would represent the growth for the future.

Operator

operator
#15

The next question is from the line of Woo Ho Rho from Meritz Securities.

Woo Ho Rho

analyst
#16

[Interpreted] There are 2 questions that I would like to ask you. The first question is that if I will remember correctly, last year around this time, you did announce your joint venture with Toray and also the intention to build out production capabilities in Europe with regard to the separators. I think that a year has passed or so. And if you look at your captive customer, LG Energy Solutions, I do believe that in light of the recent development, that it is more interested in putting priority on the U.S. market and trying to get an early foothold within that overall region. So in terms of your overall business strategy for the separator business, has there been any change in that strategy, whether it be in the capacity that you would be looking to build and also in terms of the production region where you want to be hosted or placed? In addition to that, on a relative basis, if you look at separators versus the other material that goes into batteries, it does seem to be that separator companies have been experiencing more lackluster profitability situations. So as a result of that, what would be your strategy to deal with that situation? The second question that I would like to ask you is about your acquisition of AVEO. I would like to know what type of synergies you are looking forward to with your Life Sciences division. And in terms of the processes that remain going forward for the closing of the deal, if you could update us about that situation that would be appreciated.

Unknown Executive

executive
#17

[Interpreted] Yes. Maybe I can address your question about our overall separators business. If you look at the nature of the separators business versus the revenue that you are able to generate in terms of the CapEx that is required, the CapEx is much larger. And in addition to that, to be able to generate stable margins, it does require that you have a high utilization of your overall facilities. So therefore, if we look at the market backdrop in terms of why the overall profitability has been weakening recently, it is due to more capacity additions that has taken place and the overall slowdown on the utilization side. For the Hungary JV that we have, this is an existing plan, and we are planning to go ahead according to our original plan. So as a result of that, right now, we are planning and targeting to get commercial productions up and running by the end of this year or maybe early next year. And with regards to that overall business plan, there are no changes there. However, as you have mentioned, with the likes of LG Energy Solutions and our other customers, they are investing into North America, and more of their attention is in that market. So as a separator provider, we are currently reviewing the possibility of also maybe entering into or having a presence in North America. So once any plans in that area become final, then, of course, we will make sure to update that and share that with you. However, the basic strategy that we use for our overall capacity addition plans would be that before we actually build out the capacity, we would have a discussion with the customer and try to finalize and determine what the overall volume that we would require to be supplied would be so that, that is fixed early on so that we can have a very stable operations in terms of the facilities, and that is how we will continue to expand our presence.

Unknown Executive

executive
#18

[Interpreted] Maybe I can address the second question that you asked about our Life Sciences business. The reason why we did believe that AVEO was a very attractive target was because from LG Chem's perspective, we did believe that the benefit that we have and that we bring to the table is that with regards to the initial research and also the overall exploration process in itself. This was something that we were very good at. And then on the AVEO side, they had the very strong capabilities in terms of commercialization and also getting the approval done for the various clinical development that was required for new drugs. So as a result of that, the AVEO acquisition require -- is a representation of an opportunity through which we did believe that we would be able to diversify further the overall strategic options that we were faced with. And we do believe that, that is one of the biggest attractions that this deal would represent. On the LG Chemical side, we do think that, for the overall pipeline that we have, by this acquisition on the clinical development that is required, we will be able to further accelerate building up the network that we would have for the pipeline of development. And in addition to that, we also believe that through the approval process, we would be able to get a better foothold in the overall market. In addition, we do think that by having the experience of commercial success within the organization that we would be able to accelerate the timing at which we would be able to reach the peak sales. From the AVEO side, the benefits that they would reap is that, in addition to the current portfolio of products that they have, they would be able to enjoy the benefits of having additional pipelines for the future and also the expansion of the overall investment capabilities that the company would be able to experience. So commonly across the 2 companies, we do think that this is a very good opportunity for us to become and also grow into a global company within the cancer treatment market. So if we look at the processes that are required for the future, it would be, of course, the BOD approval. And after that, for the processes that are required until the closing, we do need to get the overall business merger approval in place. There needs to be at the AVEO side, general shareholders' meeting for the deal. And we also need to have the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS, filing take place. So all in all, we do think that this process will take around 3 to 6 months in total. And during that overall period of time at the company level here, we will continue with setting forth our overall strategy and plans for the post-merger integration so that we can be prepared for the future.

Operator

operator
#19

[Interpreted] The next question is from the line of Jae Sung Yoon from Hana Financial Investment.

Jae Sung Yoon

analyst
#20

[Interpreted] There are two questions that I would like to ask you related to your overall cathodes business. The first question is that if we were to look at your overall utilization for the cathode capacity that you have and compare the third quarter to the fourth quarter, what would that overall level be? And the reason why I'm asking this question is that what's the current capacity that you have, whether there is room to further increase volume in terms of your cathodes production. In addition to that, if we were to look at next year. So for the overall utilization expectations there and also take into consideration the capacity expansion that will be taking place in Cheongju, how much of additional capacity for cathodes do you think that, that would represent as a whole? The second question that I would like to ask you is that in Wuxi, if you look at your cathode entity there, I do think that there are various benefits that you're able to enjoy. In addition to that, I understand with how you go about that you do have a local production plant that you will be building in Korea. So if we look at the Wuxi cathode plant and also whether the benefits of that plant would be able to be something that can be realized in your Gumi factory, what would be the overall situation related to that? And what is your view about that?

Unknown Executive

executive
#21

[Interpreted] To answer your overall questions. The first question, and the reason, if we talk about the overall utilization, I think I can say that for our cathodes right now, the overall utilization would be 70%. And you did mention the Wuxi facility. If you look at that situation, there is an arrangement that we have with an upstream decal mining facility or mine. And as a result of that, because of that relationship, we're able to source at a discount. So as a result of that, that enables us to enjoy higher profitability for that overall facility. With the Gumi factory, we do think that we will have a similar decal cooperation arrangement in place. So as a result of that, we do believe that the overall profitability profile of Gumi would be similar to that of what we see in China. If we talk about the overall volume expectations for next year, over the mid- to long term on a Y-o-Y basis, the overall volume growth that we are expecting would be around 30%. If we specifically talk about next year, because Ultium, which would be the JV between LGES and also GM will be taking place and also because we do see more significant orders coming outside of our captive customer, we do think that the overall growth rate as a whole will be able to increase to a larger extent than the mid- to long-term levels that we are expecting. And in addition to that, if the metal price does not have a negative impact on our overall operations, we do think that in terms of profitability that a double-digit level would be something that we would be able to achieve.

Operator

operator
#22

[Interpreted] The last question is from the line of Oscar Yee from Citi.

Oscar Yee

analyst
#23

My first question is on cathode. Recently, we do hear some of your peers is having issue securing the Korean government approval to go overseas to build the high nickel sort of cathode. I mean, do you see a sort of similar situation also facing, given you're also planning to build this U.S. plant as well? And would there be any sort of delay in terms of the commercial start-up timing, if there's any issue with the government approval side? Second question is on separator. I have noticed that Yunnan Energy actually say they plan to start construction of their U.S. plant early next year and even Yunnan already have the offtake agreement with UTM, which they announced. If Yunnan become more aggressive to expand into the U.S., do you think that you probably will be delaying or maybe scaling down your sort of potential U.S. investment on the separator side and probably focus on buying probably cheaper from Yunnan?

Unknown Executive

executive
#24

[Interpreted] So maybe I can address your question. So if we look at the overall situation with regards the competitor that you have mentioned and their intentions to try to enter into the North American market, we understand that they're trying to create a joint venture. And as a result of that, at the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Energy level, there is a committee that talks about the core technology that has been designated by the country, and I do believe that they are concerned about the security-related situations because it is a JV format. In the case of our plans for North America, we would be going independently. And in addition to that, we do have plans on how to ensure the security of our overall technology. So we don't believe that the current situation would have an impact on our overall plan. The second question about the separator capacity. As of now, we don't have any definitive plans about what our plans would be with regards to the U.S., whether we would actually conduct capacity additions in the Hungary side and try to deal with the global demand that we see, or whether we would directly invest into the U.S. to try to deal with the overall market demand. It's something that we have not decided as of yet. However, that have been said, from Yunnan Energy alone, I don't believe that the overall requirements that our customers have would be able to be fully fulfilled. And so as a result of that, even if they were to build out their capacity further, I do think that there would be still opportunities that we would be able to address.

Unknown Executive

executive
#25

[Interpreted] So with this, we would like to wrap up the third quarter earnings conference call for LG Chem. For those of you who have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact our IR team. And once again, we would like to thank everyone for taking time to participate on the call today. Thank you very much. [Portions of this transcript that are marked [Interpreted] were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete LG Chem, Ltd. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to LG Chem, Ltd. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.