Liberty Global Ltd. (LBTYA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 17, 2020

NASDAQ US Communication Services Diversified Telecommunication Services conference_presentation 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Michael Bishop

analyst
#1

Great. Let's get started. It's my pleasure to welcome back to Communacopia, CEO of Liberty Global, Michael Fries. Welcome back, Mike.

Michael Fries

executive
#2

Nice to see you guys. Thank you.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#3

Great. Just one quick admin point. There is functionality on the Communacopia website to submit online Q&A, which I can try and weave in or get to at the end.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#4

But Mike, I'd love to kick off with the COVID impact. I mean Liberty Global was super resilient in terms of trends in the second quarter. You didn't change guidance. You noted high usage, networks performing well. Could you give us perhaps an update in what you're seeing in the second half so far? And then perhaps I'll follow up, and we can talk about the more medium and long term as well.

Michael Fries

executive
#5

Sure. Well, as you say, we performed well during what has obviously been a difficult period for everybody on the planet, unfortunately. But we had a very modest impact in the second quarter on revenue. It was mostly things like sports and low-margin handset revenue, roaming revenue. So our impact financially was minimal. EBITDA was basically in line for us, and operating free cash flow was up 14% or something. So -- and our Q3 is trending pretty well. A lot of the things that impacted Q2 are still in place. So record NPS, really low churn, good growth on broadband, good cost control. So I think the Q3 period looks also quite good. And what we've learned is what everybody in this sector has learned is that we are obviously an essential service. We always felt we were essential. And -- but it's really been, I think, a very positive relationship that we're building with our customers, our communities, regulators, taking care of customers, more speed, more data, more content, whatever it takes. I mean you referenced medium term, I think it's a little tougher to predict, to be honest with you. Europe has weathered the storm well. I mean you would know that. GDP is more or less trending where people thought it would. Infection rates initially were managed very, very well. There was a lot of cooperation among EU countries. So people were pretty optimistic. I think today's sentiment's a bit more mixed. Confidence might be rising in the business, in consumer sector, and the euro's trading pretty well. But there's been spikes in infection rates, as you know. These job protection programs are going to expire, what happens then? Unemployment. And so I think we're a little less convinced of the medium term, but we remain optimistic in principle. I mean the B2B business, perhaps we're a little more cautious because that sector [ depends on ] retail, tourism, hospitality has to come back. And you need the macro recovery to really build steam. But the consumer business looks good to us. Roaming and advertising and sports revenue, where that impacts us, is already coming back. We are countercyclical. We have always been countercyclical, as you know. And the beauty of our business is we have these FMC tailwinds, these fixed mobile convergence tailwinds around synergies and scale and growth. And I would say that our entire industry, not just us, is really trying to figure out how to bottle the magic that's come out here in this period of time. When NPS is as high as it is and churn is as low as it is, you want to keep that relationship steady. So I'm much more optimistic on the consumer side. And I think medium term, we'll watch the broader indicators, but we remain cautiously optimistic.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#6

Yes. One theme actually that's come out in the last couple of days of the conference from telco operators in Europe is we're already talking a lot about digitalization and the shift from physical to online, both from a work practice perspective, but also in terms of physically selling your products to customers. I mean do you think COVID has just accelerated that almost overnight?

Michael Fries

executive
#7

Totally. Totally, in almost every category. More self-installs, more online sales, a real catalyst for all of the digital initiatives that we've been pursuing in Switzerland and Belgium and Holland and the U.K. because it's an eye-opener, right? I mean retail shops are closed or have been or depending on which market, and so we were -- we've been forced to really kick that into high gear, but it's really been a positive experience. So all the key metrics, whether it's online sales, customer -- digital customer interactions, self-installs are all up materially in almost every market. So I think the industry as a whole has got a good kick in the pants in this space, and I think it's going to pay dividends.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#8

Yes. What I wanted to do -- and actually, versus a year ago, a lot of things are clearer about Liberty Global. So I wanted to sort of methodically walk through the different countries and talk about the stand-alone, but then also come to the various deals that you've announced, obviously. But firstly, we start with still the biggest asset, the U.K. There's been a lot of focus on U.K. pricing, I mean, over the last couple of years, in general. And we've had the headwinds on regulatory and broadband competition. Could you just discuss the pricing environment? Because a lot of people have been asking me over the last couple of weeks. Virgin's decided not to take price. And then we've this announcement from BT, they'd already moved to inflation-linked pricing, now they're going to do inflation plus 4. So how do you think about the Virgin decision? How do you think about the market in general?

Michael Fries

executive
#9

Yes. Good question. So listen, Virgin is, for those who don't know, has already got the highest, most stable ARPU in the market. And I'll emphasize stable because it is relatively stable. And that's because we have the best fees, the highest bundle penetration. So we lead the market in ARPU, ARPU stability and, historically, ARPU growth. Second quarter was off about 1.8%, as you know, but that was almost entirely sports. When Sky Sports and the sports product shut down, the premium, low-margin, 0-margin sports business goes away, you lose that revenue. If you take that sports impact out, we were up slightly in the second quarter. Other operators, I think, were down 5% to 6%, almost all of them in that category. And the market remains competitive, as you would know, right? Broadband competition is intense, especially in that 60 to 100 megabit range, prices were down last 12 months. And a lot of that's because of open reach and volume discounts. And we've got some regulatory headwinds as you well documented around end-of-contract notifications and things like that. But the price rise for us -- not taking the price rise, which is the first time, was the right decision. For starters, we had such good performance on broadband and customer growth. We really wanted to keep that tailwind. I think the macro picture is tough for consumers. And we felt it was the right thing to do not morally so much, it's just for our customers as it is. And it's been good for our business. And what Lutz will tell you, and as he might said on the second quarter call like he did, is we can mitigate that lost revenue for 3 months in a couple of different ways. Number one, we had our best second quarter in 4 years. So that additional customer growth is going to pay dividends through the second half of the year in the revenue line. NPS remains high. Churn remains low. So we have good, good momentum in the consumer business. We're launching new products, 600 megabits for our ultimate and new customers. We're launching a new TV product. So we have a lot of positive things happening that we think will keep RGU and customer growth really robust in the second half of the year. It's not a permanent move. We always take a look at the macro picture, the competitive environment. As you point out, what our peers are doing, I thought it wasn't -- it was interesting how BT got all this credit for CPI. And then they said, "Whoops." And so we retain a lot of optionality to take price where it matters. But in our minds, the strategy is always underpinned by more for more. So we want to take price when we can give more consumers. And we've got some things coming that will allow us to do that. So I wouldn't view this as a change in strategy as such. I think we just -- at this moment, we felt it was the right thing to do, and it's giving us a nice boost in consumer sentiment and consumer growth.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#10

Yes. No, that's very clear. And I think from a BT perspective, as they invest all this money in fiber, which leads into my next question, they're sitting there thinking, CPI is not that much and we're investing billions into upgrading the network. So from that perspective, you've potentially got a negative impact on Virgin because BT's product becomes more competitive across your footprint. But then potentially, there's more of a pricing tailwind, which might be underpinned by better regulation for asset owners as we go to the Ofcom review or the finalization of the Ofcom review next year. Now how do you think about all those dynamics in terms of the stand-alone Virgin business?

Michael Fries

executive
#11

I think you've hit on the right points. Let me just start by making the obvious claim, which I need to make for investors who may not know. We're the clear speed leader in this market, and that's not going to change anytime soon. Clear speed leader, not going to change anytime soon. We are already offering 1 gig to 3.6 million homes. I think BT has reached 3 million homes. That gap is going to triple in the next 12 months because we'll be launching 1 gig to all 15 million homes. They are budgeted to get to 4.5 million by [ mid-2022 ]. So this gap is going to widen. And our ability to sort of create momentum and energy around 1 gig is going to be almost unchallenged for a period of time here. And as you point out, wholesale rates in fiber are unregulated. So I think the published rate is something like GBP 31. And that's driven higher ARPUs in this 1 gig category, GBP 50, GBP 60 ARPUs. And so that's a positive. Now that might change. BT could lower prices. It could all evolve. But today, it's actually more of a positive. In my opinion, when you look at the market there, it's a 2-horse race in this fiber experience, if you will. It's us and BT. The altnets, and there's a bunch of them, a lot of them, they can't all survive. They built 1.4 million homes. They have big ambition, but they can't all make it. And so if you look at our business, we're at 15 million homes today, gigabit ready. We're building 400,000 to 500,000 a year in Lightning. And as we've said many, many times, we are excited about the opportunity to take that number to 22 million, 25 million over the next 5 to 7 years. BT is at 3 million today, saying they're going to get to 20 million by mid-, late '20s. So I don't know what that means. And they've got some hurdles. You pointed out a couple. They've got financial hurdles. They've got technical hurdles, resource hurdles. So will they do it, when they do it? I don't know. But for the time being, it's really us and them. And we're really -- we've got a massive gap, as you say, on the reach issue. And prices are high. So I think the whole whether the 1 gig market expands in the U.K. as awareness and availability expand and as unregulated rates probably stay high for a while, that's an ARPU tailwind, in my opinion, and a positive thing. And this whole equation, I think, supports the logic of the O2 transaction, where we know we are going to be a national champion in this market. We're the best broadband network, the best 5G network, the best brands. It just -- it all sort of positively compounds, and it sort of sets us up nicely.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#12

No. Nice. My next question, which is we hosted Telefonica on Tuesday. They're very upbeat on the deal. And so I'd just love to get your thoughts on where are we in terms of thinking about the regulatory process, and then probably more importantly, whether you and Telefonica have been able to think about things like management team, the brand, the broader strategy, whether that includes more build and those sort of bigger strategic questions.

Michael Fries

executive
#13

Sure. Sure. So first of all, I think this is a great transaction for us, obviously. As I said, we're building a national champion. We've got a great valuation for our business. The transaction is generating cash for us at closing, synergies over GBP 6 billion. There's going to be sort of a long-term distributable free cash flow profile to the business. And I think all strategic options are on the table, in fact, may be enhanced. So from my perspective, it's a really positive deal. And I think O2, as I said on our call, is the best partner for us. I mean they have the best brand, they have the lowest churn, highest NPS, best front-book, back-book equation. And I think we have an opportunity to cross-sell mobile to 80% of our customers who don't have an O2 mobile. And they can cross-sell or we will all cross-sell broadband to half of their mobile base who doesn't have our broadband. So a lot of opportunities here. It sets up very nicely for fixed mobile convergence, gives us the scale to invest in 1 gig and 5G gives us the strength to compete. And the synergies, obviously, are nice tailwind. The deal is actually going very well. You may have noticed the financing got done. And we have done actually GBP 10 billion of refi, recap financing around Virgin just this June. This is sort of a record achievement, 8-year average life, 4.25% kind of rates. So the financing, ticked, done. And I think we're really pleased with the reception of the debt capital markets have around the deal. The integration process is progressing. This is all pre-merger integration. So there's only so much you can do, but we're validating synergies. We're building the joint business plan together. We've got our day 1 strategies. We're evaluating management that's coming together. No announcements there. And then the regulatory process is going smoothly. I mean we're doing what we were supposed to do. We had notified this transaction to the EU. We had no other option to do that. That is the process. EU is doing a ton of work. Fortunately for us, this is -- I don't know how many transactions of ours they've evaluated in the fixed mobile space. I think this is the sixth one. It's pretty regular stuff. It's -- there's very few theories of harm that we think are impactful here. They're very positive about the case. And we're monitoring the process between the EU and CMA, which we don't control. And of course, we've kept CMA and Ofcom up to speed on everything. So we're very -- feeling very positive about the regulatory process with no more strong precedence in the U.K. for this deal, BT and EE would just be one. And we'll know more in the next month or so about timing. But everything is coming together on this transaction, really enjoy working with Telefonica, see eye to eye pretty much on everything so far. And I think this is going to be an exciting, exciting business.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#14

I was about to move on from the U.K., but just got a couple of questions from the audience. And actually bringing a couple of them together, it seems to be this recurring question about whether you would consider sort of wholesaling from a fixed perspective in the U.K. or JV-ing with bigger retail players? I mean is that something that's just on hold while you set the JV? Or do you have any more thoughts on...

Michael Fries

executive
#15

I mean I'll say 2 things to be careful. One, all options are open. But two, we have to be thoughtful about -- our focus right now is obviously on the regulatory process. So it would be very difficult for us in the midst of a binding transaction that's under regulatory review to go ahead and do something else significant or strategic that could alter or impact the transaction and the regulatory process. So clearly, we're not going to do that and nor should we do that. Having said that, once the deal is complete, we've had preliminary conversations with Telefonica. I think they agree with us. As we were sort of talking a bit more about before this announcement, we think the opportunity to build a robust network in that market that potentially with other partners, potentially with financial partners, creating some sort of wholesale arrangements could be very accretive and very interesting. And we look forward to those conversations. Nothing's off table. I guess that's what I'd say. But today, we have to be laser-focused on this transaction.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#16

Yes. No, perfect. That was all very clear. And then moving to the next big transaction in Switzerland. I think this is the first time we've caught up since the Sunrise transaction. So I'd love to start big picture, how you're presenting this deal, the rationale, the multiple paid. And then also how you see the position of the combined entity and what the opportunity is in the medium to long term in the Swiss market.

Michael Fries

executive
#17

Sure. Well, I mean when we came into 2020, you, others had 2 big questions for us, right? How are you going to compete in the U.K. long term? And what's going on in Switzerland? And we've -- obviously, we've answered both of those questions, okay? U.K., we built a fixed mobile champion for the ages. And in Switzerland now, we're acquiring Sunrise in what we think a very accretive transaction with great synergies. The deal from my perspective is a home run deal, building a national FMC challenger. We'll have 1 gigabit to 90% of Swiss households. Swisscom, I think, has a 30% reach of fiber. We'll have the best mobile with 5G right around the corner. We've got B2B upside. We're #2 to Swisscom in every category, which sets us up to be really the #1 challenger. And I think it rationalizes the market. Swisscom is like, yes, great, love it. So I think there's a lot of positive things there. Since synergies are huge, right, I mean 3 billion of synergies. We've now vetted them 3x. So we know they're real, and we have a good track record on these synergies. And it's great for Liberty Global shareholders. Some people have said, "Wow, the valuation seems high." But look, the fact is this, Swiss stocks trade at a premium, right? That's because you got negative interest rates. You've got a safe haven currency, strong economy, tax regimes. Sunrise was the darling of that public market, no question about it, for a lot of good reasons. But post-synergies, the multiples are 7.5x EBITDA and 10x operating free cash flow. So in our mind, there's a very good rate of return on this deal. And it's on track. It's on track. The tender process is launched. We'll get interim results mid-October. We'll get final results early in November. Financing done, tick. I think we did -- we are 8-year average life, sub-4% rates on that financing. That's done. Regulatory process underway. This is already approved once, so we don't see any issues. There's some noise recently around Salt litigation. I'm sure you saw that.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#18

Yes.

Michael Fries

executive
#19

On Monday, the Swiss Court denied the request for an injunction. We'll let Sunrise manage the communications on that. But the case, of course, this is a baseless claim and an unfortunate diversion. But at the end of the day, injunction denied, and we're moving forward. This transaction is going to close well before year-end. And I couldn't be more excited about it. I mean it's going to be a real positive business opportunity for us in a market where we had many, many years of great success. And some years where we've got very competitive, and now we're -- we'll be the clear #2 in that market, and I think that's a great position for us.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#20

Yes. And perhaps the best example of these FMC businesses is what's happening at Vodafone. Before we talk about the sort of operational success, perhaps I'll just ask upfront sort of what everyone asked. Are we any closer to thinking about who or sort of what happens to this asset longer term given now it's back into positive EBITDA growth territory, the dividends are continuing at a very healthy clip?

Michael Fries

executive
#21

No, we're not necessarily. I mean, as you know, we have some triggers built into the partnership. By the way, it's a very strong partnership, a very good partnership with Vodafone. We've had no issues working together. It's really been -- we got a great management team. So I have 0 complaints. And I hope Nick doesn't have any either. It's just been a real success story for working together, collaborating. So that's all really positive, and we'll talk about the business. But listen, there are some triggers built in. No joint ventures last forever. Some do, most don't. We had built in an IPO trigger that's active now, and we've built in a soft put, basically a for sale drag along right that starts next January, 2021. Will either of us trigger those? Let's see. I mean I like the business. They came into 2020, VodafoneZiggo with some questions. You might have addressed those, right? There was a spectrum auction pending. They nailed it. Got all the spectrum they needed. There was a wholesale regulation looming over the business, annulled by the Dutch industry of [indiscernible]. Annulled, done. A deal with FOX Sports that needed to get done, nailed it. It's a great outcome. So they answered all the questions going into the year, and the business has performed really well. As you pointed out, you have 5 consecutive quarters of revenue growth, EBITDA up big, fixed ARPU up big, guidance confirmed, generating something like 400 million to 500 million of distributable cash to us and Vodafone. And the outlook is strong on the EBITDA -- every line item. And I will tell you, fixed mobile convergence is the reason for that. This is a case study for fixed mobile convergence. Maybe we'll help you put together a report that really breaks apart what's gone -- what's happened in Holland and why it's so successful. But when you can cross-sell the way we have -- we've had 3 years of growth in postpaid and broadband. We've had mobile churn down 80% in fixed mobile, fixed churn down 50%, I think, with fixed mobile customers, NPS up. So all the things that you want to achieve in fixed mobile deals is happening there, and there's more to come. We're just rolling out 1 gig, 5G now, the first operator with 5G. So I think 7 out of 10 Dutch consumers or households have a product from us. I mean it's really been a great success story. And we -- and this is how we mapped it out, to be honest with you. So someday, we'll have to figure out what happens with the partnership. For the meantime, it's distributing great cash. And we're really excited about management. And it's -- we're going to -- we've learned a ton. And trust me when I say this, we've learned a ton that will be executed and incorporated in Switzerland and the U.K., both in Belgium and Holland. We're old hands at this now. 5 years, we've been doing fixed mobile convergence. So we know how to execute on synergies, drive commercial strategies and achieve results. So...

Michael Bishop

analyst
#22

Perfect. I do definitely want to come back to Belgium, but given you're sort of mentioning cash and as we've just covered off the 2 deals, I'm also seeing some questions on the screen along these lines, which is basically your cash balance post the Sunrise acquisition. Because as you already highlighted, the U.K. deal, you actually received cash upon [ completion ], very clear, the cash out for the Sunrise deal. I mean on my calculation, you're going to have a significant cash balance. I think you yourself cited remaining liquidity, so cash and liquidity of $7 billion, which is obviously a lot. The big question is, what -- how should we think about the cash balance post these 2 transactions? So I guess that's middle of next year perhaps.

Michael Fries

executive
#23

Yes. Listen, I mean I'm going to sound like a broken record on this. And it's the right question to ask. Everybody is asking. And we've always said the -- I always say the same thing. There's 2 key priorities: buybacks and our core markets. And that -- what have we done in the last 12 months? We bought back 3.6 billion of stock, something like 20% of our market cap. I looked around. I have my IR guys look around. Nobody else is doing that. I don't know any other companies that are buying back 20% of their market cap in 12 months. So we certainly delivered on that objective. And secondly, we've done these 2 big fixed mobile deals in our 2 core markets. One generates cash, one takes cash. So we've done what we said we would do. Every time we get asked the question, buybacks, core markets, #1 and 2, #2 and 1 depending on what's going on. Wherever we have assets, we're trying to become a fixed mobile champion. If we can't do it because we don't have the scale or the REITs, then we exit. And that -- what have we been doing for 3 or 4 years now? Exiting markets where we don't think there's a shot, merging or buying where we can, and that's exactly what we'll continue to do. And we're running out of markets, right? I mean we have some ready-made opportunity. We just talked about one. Could cash be used in something in Holland? Maybe. I don't know. Possibly. Ireland is sitting out there, possibly. We have good scale in that market. We've looked at other markets for fixed mobile convergence in Europe. Haven't seen anything very interesting. We believe in building and operating scale businesses, ideally in geographies we know well, right? That's -- and so we're looking at infrastructure. We have infrastructure. We know we can monetize infrastructure. We have partners who are dying to partner with us in infrastructure. That could be an interesting play, so much capital, who knows. That's really the strategy. And I think we -- as time -- and just watch what we're doing, listen to what I'm saying, but more importantly just watch what we're doing. I think that will tell you what the game plan is.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#24

Perhaps this is a sort of a follow-up. But my question was, how should we think about Liberty Global in 3 to 5 years? Because if I pick up on the themes that we've been discussing last couple of years at Communacopia, the last 2 years, it was the private versus public valuations of telco assets, but in particular, fixed assets. And then it also feels like you yourselves have been thinking about do you potentially sort of collapse or very much slim down the Liberty Global holding company. And you've already pushed some of the OpEx to the local assets, but there's still some CapEx. So we just try and wrap all that together in 3 to 5 years' time. And what should we be thinking about?

Michael Fries

executive
#25

Sure. Well, let me maybe take them one at a time. Look, private valuations are real. This isn't something I'm making up. What have we done something like plus/minus 30 billion in transactions at double-digit multiples. So I think Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom are pretty smart players, and they think it's worth what we're paying, what we're selling them for. And we've done 2 JVs in high single digits. So private valuations are real. Whether people want to believe them or not, I don't know. It's real, and we've got massive transaction to demonstrate that. We're not happy with the gap. You're right, there's a gap. And it's not something -- but I can tell you, there's 4 things that we're doing to close the gap that we have to keep doing, and I think we'll close the gap. Number one, we just talked about one of them, continue to clarify the use of cash. Every quarter, you get greater clarity on that. To me, that's definitely on people's minds. It's question 1, 2 or 3 depending on who you're talking to. Secondly, we got to continue to answer the questions around the operating businesses, which we've done. People are rightly concerned about competition, CapEx profile growth. I get that. But we've addressed those with these FMC transactions, and we got to get those deals closed and start executing on those synergies. And that goes away, in my opinion. We're also -- as you would notice, we're kind of -- we're pivoting the narrative here. I've been at this a long time. And in the last 10 to 15 years, we've really been -- it's been a race for broadband share. We've had heavy CapEx periods. We've been EBITDA growth focused. But in the more recent past and moving forward, it's about fixed mobile convergence. It's about slower but much more steady and predictable growth. It's about a lower CapEx profile, declining CapEx profile and distributable free cash. That is the narrative. And our investor base and our narrative aren't always matching up, but that is the narrative, and it's an attractive one. And we're evolving the structure of the company. That's the fourth thing, and you just identified it, right? Historically, we have been mostly wholly owned assets, a lot of them and -- with mixed scale. And that was -- that suited us in this race for market share in broadband. But today, we are only in a handful of markets. We have national champion scale. And we're looking at multiple structures, listed, JVs, whatever might make the most sense. And that's the right approach. Look, local listings could be very attractive for us. I'm not committing to do it. We're not definitely going to do it, but there's a very deep investor pool, you would know this, in Europe. They love national champions. They love predictable free cash flow. Let's look at where Swisscom, KPN, Tele2, Sunrise traded on, OFCF multiple or dividend yield. And the listed entities, we know it well, and it also creates some transparency around what businesses are worth. We get this distributable cash to the parent. We get a flexible capital structure to do things. So it's an option for us. I'm not saying it's a sure thing. But we're really in the -- still in the midst of this transition. Every quarter, it gets clearer, whether it's on the deal front, the operating front or the cash front. And so I'm patient. Of course, I've been here 30 years. John is patient. We hope shareholders are patient. But I think the strategy we're implementing here is the right one. And the businesses we're building and the assets that we're becoming part of together in these core markets are going to be winners. And that's what matters most. They have to have operating engines in these core markets to support valuation, leverage and potentially listings. And I think we're headed right in that direction.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#26

Great. That's really comprehensive. I mean perhaps one of the sort of final questions, and maybe I had a couple on Belgium as well and one on technology. But the next question is just around your sort of other asset portfolio. I mean you've very clearly been through and effectively converged all of the assets. So how should we think about just the other smaller assets within the group?

Michael Fries

executive
#27

Yes. So Ireland, we're a scale player there. The Ireland will be not part of, of course, the O2 transaction. So Virgin Media Ireland stays independent. We're a scale player there. We've got 1 million gigabit homes. We've got strong broadband and TV share. We've got 2 free-to-air networks that are crushing it. And there are some interesting partners there. So watch this space. Poland, we're probably subscale in Poland. We've got 4 million homes there. I think 70% are gigabit ready or gigabit marketing. We've got some strategies to expand our reach, either with direct build or wholesale access, but it's an interesting play. It's a big market, competitive market, fragmented market. So we're looking at options in that market. In Slovakia, which is the last one, we're small, subscale. There, I think we're either going to exit, partner or maybe get bigger. But it's -- it's not big enough to worry about, 15 million, 20 million of EBITDA. So those are the only 3 markets left. We do have a venture portfolio, right? I mean people don't like to hear about it, but we've got a venture portfolio. We value it at 1.4 billion. And it's got some really strong assets in a tech and content stuff. I'll just give you a couple of examples. We were an early investor in EdgeConneX, which is a colocation play for hyperscale and edge customers, big presence in Europe. Just got bought by EQT for, I think, 2.6 billion. We're going to roll our stake. We've got a board seat, gives us all kinds of exposure and opportunity for infrastructure plays in Europe. We were an early investor in a company called Skillz. Just did a deal with at 3.5 billion. So we're making some smart investments, and we've got Formula E and All3Media. And so I don't want to highlight it and put it at the top of the page, but the stuff we're doing in this little venture portfolio could become really valuable down the road. And it doesn't take up a lot of time or capital. But it's out there, and it's worth understanding.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#28

Yes. That's what brings me to Telenet. It continues to perform really well, really good free cash flow generation. I mean could you give us your latest thoughts on the asset and whether there are sort of opportunities...

Michael Fries

executive
#29

Love the asset, love John, love the team. I think they're doing all the right stuff. I think a couple of things would help that stock, which we're evaluating. One, perhaps a more predictable policy around dividends might be useful perhaps for that -- we'll see if that makes sense or not. I think they're at the 50% to 70% of free cash flow kind of commitment, but it's a hard commitment. So I think investors might benefit from perhaps a stronger commitment to some dividends there. They certainly can afford it. I think there's some really interesting strategic opportunities in that market. The Fluvius discussion, which has been reported on, whereby Telenet would join with the largest infrastructure player in Flanders to really own the network of the future. It's an interesting and exciting play. And I think the opportunity to expand into the South remains to me highly exciting. You would basically double the size of your reach with your mobile platform now having fixed mobile opportunity everywhere. So really interesting play. Operationally, top-notch team. They're getting every nickel out of that market in terms of managing fixed mobile products, efficiency, cash flow. So I have great confidence in the team. I think the stock will react to some of these strategic and financial moves. And look at it, it still trades at a massive premium to us. So if anything, it's a great example of listed companies finding their way with strong local investor base.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#30

Yes. I guess one pushback to that would be, it does seem to still trade pretty cheap on levered free cash flow yields. That's always the metric that people sort of asked me about Telenet on and say, it's like you say, all the things are good about the asset, and it's just that levered free cash flow yield is still low double digits.

Michael Fries

executive
#31

Yes. I think it's a combination of what I just said around dividends, personally. That's just my view. I think because people aren't -- they don't know for sure what the payout will be. And I think secondly, they get more leverage than, say, Swisscom or -- so they're levered, I think, 4, 4.5x. So it's probably a couple of those things. But listen, it's a gold standard in our space in terms of the predictable cash flow. And so to me, it's some tweaking around that narrative a little bit, not fundamental change to what the business is doing.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#32

Yes. No, that makes sense. And one sort of, I guess, the can of worms that the Telenet, Fluvius discussions have opened up, and I've certainly been getting a lot of questions on is how should we think about the -- I mean this is the very long term, but the FTTH versus coax debate because I'm -- well, in my mind, they're not saying that they're going to suddenly replace the coax in the whole of Flanders with FTTH. But it does seem like the narrative is if you think about going to 10 gigs, and you think about the 10-year view, perhaps FTTH drives higher cost savings as you upgrade speeds versus coax. So how do you think about that holistically, given Liberty's...

Michael Fries

executive
#33

It's the right question. We're mapping out right now a road map for 10 gig. And if we showed it to you, you would see that we're at 1 gig today. With DOCSIS, we can easily get to 2.5, maybe 5 gig. That's just -- think about [ 2 ], those are big numbers. But there are options when we look at 10 gig. And remember, this is 8 years out, right? When I was talking to you at this conference 20 years ago, which it was 20 years ago or more, about 1 meg, people are like excited. And then 100 meg, who needs it. And then 1 gig seeming like yesterday's speed something. So -- but 10 gig is not that far off. Both networks can get there, FTTH and DOCSIS. Each of them have challenges. You need DOCSIS 4 as a standard and FTTH need other aspects to develop. And we're looking at both flexibly. So in Holland, in the U.K., for example, I think 6 or 7 out of 10 homes we build there are fiber to the home. And we know that longer term, that's easily achievable and what we'll do. And in the case of Telenet, we're committed to HFC, but it works, and it works well. And I think if there is going to be fiber, it's going to be very smart evolution, not sort of we're scrapping the HFC network and rebuilding. That's prohibitively expensive. Those decisions will never get made like that. So if that's a concern around the stock, I'm telling you today, that's not going to happen. We're not going to authorize a massive rebuild of the network for reasons that aren't really needed today or even perhaps in the long term. The HFC net is strong, robust. It can easily get to 1, 2.5, maybe 5 gig without massive evolutionary risk. 10 gig, we have options. And so let's worry about that when we get there. We're not even close to that question.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#34

Great. Well, no, I think that's a really good place to finish, and it just leaves me to thank you so much again for the time. I always appreciate you coming to the conference.

Michael Fries

executive
#35

Yes. Yes. I don't feel like I came. I just appeared on the screen. But hopefully, next year, we're all back in the same room, that would be great.

Michael Bishop

analyst
#36

I know exactly. I haven't missed the business travel all that much, but I really missed this conference and particularly on the networking side. It's a shame. Hopefully next year. Thanks.

Michael Fries

executive
#37

Thanks for having me. Take care.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Liberty Global Ltd. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Liberty Global Ltd. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.