Light S.A. (LIGT3) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 15, 2023

B3 - Brasil Bolsa Balcao BR Utilities Electric Utilities earnings 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#1

[Foreign Language] Welcome to light Q1 2023 earnings call. I am Rodrigo Vilela, [Operator Instructions] Octavio Lopes, our CEO, will make his opening remarks and then our CFO, Eduardo Gotilla will comment on our results. This presentation can be downloaded at our IR website. [Operator Instructions] This webinar is being recorded, and its audio will be available at our website. On to our disclaimer. Any forward-looking statements made during this presentation concerning the perspectives, projections, operational and financial goals are based on beliefs of the company's leadership based on currently available information. Any of these statements do not involve certain results. They involve uncertainties and events that may or may not occur. General economic conditions, industry conditions, among other operational factors may impact the company's results that can lead to results that are materially different from those made in the forward-looking statements. I will now turn over to Mr. Octavio Lopes.

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#2

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Light's Earnings Calls for Q1 2023. Before I talk about the numbers, I would like to once again point out that the leadership is confident that the Chapter 11 filing that has been approved earlier this morning is the best way possible to ensure the group's sustainability. In the previous earnings call, we shared the diagnosis that stated that the company had to go through this reorganization, given the Light S.A. high debt levels. It has had structural problems in that concession. This is the best approach for the company. At the start of the process a month ago, we had a small number of creditors that did not want to mediate. They wanted to become a hurdle in that process, that would lead to a chaos in the energy distribution. So the Light S.A. was the only alternative to preserve the financial capacity of the companies, and ensure the stability in the operations of our concessions. Light S.A. has the obligation to cover for all the debt of the entire group. The distribution company and the generation company are going to remain solvent in all its tax and the payments of all investments to ensure the continuity of concession, including workers, suppliers and service providers. Light SESA remains running normally, preserving the entire electrical industry and ensuring the quality of the service we provide to 11 million consumers. Despite that aggressiveness of that small number of creditors, we have been negotiating with a relevant portion of creditors, and we believe we can come up with a proposal on a short-term basis. This is going to be a plan to adjust the balance sheet of a private company with no burden to the government. We're going to, of course, establish negotiations with the conceding agents so that we can renew the concession. Our commitment is with the long-term stability of the company and the concession. Let me now address the first quarter of the year. We have been continuing the strategy we established in the past quarter, establishing the distribution company with more managerial control. We managed to reduce BRL 100 million in costs and expenses for the quarter. And the distributor cash generation is up 74% to BRL 141 million when compared to first quarter of last year. We have strategically redefined the fights to loss proofing. Light has been focusing on these initiatives that will help provide better results based on a very profound analysis, trying to eliminate those operations that would hurt our cash generation. Distributor is increasing 46% in adjusted EBITDA with a negative result of BRL 2 million, much better than the loss of BRL 137 million in Q1 of 2022. Despite that improvement, both the generation and the distribution companies have been provided consistent results, BRL 107 million in the quarter, reverting a loss of BRL 106 million in the same period of last year. Despite that scenario, the situation of the distributor that is far, very far from what we needed to maintain the stability. We, of course, have to readjust its balance sheet. I'll turn it over to Gotilla, and he will be showing you the results for the quarter, and will be available for the Q&A session.

Eduardo Guardiano Gotilla

executive
#3

Thank you, Octavio. Good morning, everyone. Let me now explain the results of Q1, that's on Slide 4. These are our efforts to financially stabilize the distribution company. Along the lines with the strategic decision started out in Q4 of 2022, we keep on investing -- adjusting investments and operational expenses. It was BRL 103 million below year-on-year. . The biggest contribution comes from CapEx. The reduction is the result of the strategic revision of the loss proofing plan. I'll be addressing that shortly. I would like to draw your attention to the smaller PMSO despite inflationary pressure. On the right, we have improved the cash generation of the distribution for the company, adjusted EBITDA and CapEx. We burned cash BRL 61 million in Q1. We have a positive result of BRL 141 million, a significant improvement of over BRL 200 million. On to Slide 5. Let me show you the context of losses. Despite nontechnical losses have been kept at reasonable flat standards, the reference market has been deteriorated for almost 10 years. We haven't even recovered volumes pre-pandemic. The simple calculation shows that the nontechnical losses on the reference market has grown year after year despite all our efforts to fight those losses. In late March, the distribution company was 22 percentage points above the loss transfer. The difference between actual loss and regulatory losses impacts our EBITDA by BRL 582 million. That search for stabilizing, the company has led us to review the loss proofing strategy. We reduced activities on the medium- and long-term basis. We discontinued those activities that would consume cash and provide limited results. We've included parameters such as possibility of due desalization by class, by region to bring those back collection will, therefore, have sustainable results in the periods to come. On Slide 6, we have the distribution company EBITDA. It grew 46% and BRL 108 million year-on-year. Most important effects came from gross margin due to price increase in '22. PMS is in line with last year's numbers, despite inflation, almost 5%. Contingencies, we had less net losses due to better settlements, reducing average cost of cases. The apparent increase in PECLD is driven by a change in recalculation method. But when we compare to BRL [ 250 ] million, PECLD was down by 35%. In conclusion, about the distribution, we have BRL 456 million of PIS and COFINS taxes, and we set only BRL 163 million. The difference demanded BRL 292 million from our cash. Finally, on to Slide 7. Our energy business had a gross margin slightly higher. And combined with smaller PMS, we have 4% more adjusted EBITDA, reaching BRL 202 million. I'll turn back to Rodrigo Vilela for the Q&A session. Thank you.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#4

Thank you, Gotilla. Let's now begin our Q&A. [Operator Instructions] There is a question about the case of transfer of the company's PIS/COFINS taxes. And I would like to combine a couple of questions. Eduardo Gotilla, our CFO, will address all of them at once, all at once.

Eduardo Guardiano Gotilla

executive
#5

According to the RTA, we had back in March, we have BRL 1.7 billion to return for -- in the next 12 months. And we have a little over BRL 3 billion of liabilities to return to customers. At the PIS/COFINS pace, that will take a couple of years to return the total amount in liabilities.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#6

Andre Sampaio from the Santander Bank will ask the next question.

Andre Sampaio

analyst
#7

I have 2 questions. I just wanted to confirm to make sure I heard that correctly. You talked about the initial plan was, first, establishing agreement creditors and then start negotiating with the government. Is that the road map? I just want to make sure. Second question, is this negotiation process include the possible sale of the generation company?

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#8

Andre, this is Octavio. Thank you for your question. As to the time frame, so they are interdependent actually. And we have no control over them. But we believe that the solution or the rebalancing of the company would be quicker. So that would be the -- within the time frame by year's end. And the final solution for the renewal would be addressed next year, expecting to do that for 2026 in advance. So in answering your question, yes, we expect to address the issue with creditors first, then the issue with the concession. Onto the possible sale of generation, just like any reorganization process, everything is on the table, but we do not have a process in place to do that. And we don't believe that would be the best solution for the group.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#9

Henrique Peretti asks the next question.

Henrique Peretti

analyst
#10

My question is about regulation, the negotiations with Are you expecting any regulatory changes, maybe special regimen? Or is it just an adjustment of current standards, maybe just adjusting the loss percentage?

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#11

Henrique, when we look at the Light case, we have 2 parameters. According to current regulation to transfer those losses, we believe there's an imbalance as to the formula and the way it was applied last year. And we have that extraordinary request to adjust tariffs. So that would be the first step according to current standards. We have already requested that change so that we could increase that immediate losses transfer. And number two, just like we said before, in that process of reviewing tariffs, we believe that a concession -- such as that Light, that we have some a significant portion of restricted operations that requires a differentiated treatment for those ASRO. That's why we want to have that special treatment for the next concession cycle for the next 30 years.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#12

One of the questions here from Daniel Travitzky from Safra.

Daniel Travitzky

analyst
#13

How is this RJ project or will happen that reorganization? Are you going to resort to the legal system, so because one of the companies cannot file for Chapter 11. Do you believe that you can anticipate that concession renewals is?

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#14

I'll turn it over to Octavio.

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#15

Daniel, thank you. Thank you for your questions. I'll try to address all of them. Number one, first, for the reorganization filing, it's a traditional reorganization filing according to the law. But since the request was from the holding, Light S.A., including the debt of its subsidiaries, because they are co-responsible for those debts, we have that stand still. We can negotiate the debt in the reorganization environment because they can be very helpful to everyone. And at the same time, we'll be able to maintain operations running business as usual. And will become -- will be solvent, maintaining service quality and fulfilling all our obligations with consumers. So that's the route we chose to preserve the concession, the service, but enables a healthy negotiation environment. We have 60 days to come up with a proposal to our creditors. We're doing that, of course, even before that legal time frame. And then we have to come up with a majority to support that process. That's what we are striving for. As to resort into the legal system, a reorganization process is already in the legal system. So we are comfortable with that request. It has been approved earlier this morning. Whether they are going to resort to the legal system or not, but we do believe it holds and we'll be able to come up with a solution for balancing the balance sheet focusing on Light SESA in which there's a clear financial imbalance. As to the renewal of the concession, of course, we're not committed -- or there's no commitment from the part of the conceding power of the government per se to advance that. But we believe it makes sense. There have been several cases in which that concession was anticipated in the energy industry, within the contract time frame, we are going to make a segment that is nonbinding about our interest in renewal and renewing that concession. And the conceding power has 18 months to make a decision after we make that statement. So that would be November 2024. So we're making a nonbinding statements that we are willing to renew the concession to turn the page and to going back to having a healthy Light S.A., Light SESA.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#16

Marcelo Sá from Itau BBA asks the next question.

Marcelo Sá

analyst
#17

You had a material fact, meaning saying that there was a sale of 15% stake. We have other relevant stakeholders or shareholders actually.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#18

Breaking up. I can't hear what he's saying.

Marcelo Sá

analyst
#19

I think there was an indication that this new investor is willing to come up with BRL 1 billion to invest in the company. Have you been talking to ANEEL to maybe change the flow of that PIS/COFINS transfer? Would that be beneficial to the company? And now on to the reorganization. Have you discussed that with ANEEL as a possibility? Or did you make that decision unilaterally? And maybe is there a possibility of ANEEL if they don't agree to it to have an intervention in the company?

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#20

We had a hard time hearing you in the first and second question. Could you please repeat them, please?

Marcelo Sá

analyst
#21

My question is about -- purchased a 15% stake. And my question is whether that was a strategy in agreement with other relevant shareholders, including -- We read in the press that he would be willing to inject BRL 1 billion in the company. And my second question was about PIS/COFINS and the return flow because ANEEL controls that. Are you discussing maybe postponing that flow?

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#22

Marcelo, the company that we -- the information we have is that the WNT fund got in touch and they informed they purchased first a 10% and then a 15% stake, and the Board defines the company strategy. The way we see it is that nothing changes. The Board was elected in the past meeting 7 candidates with a 2-year term with 100% of the voting members, connection between those shareholders and the company's strategy, based on the model we have been operating under. As to the PIS/COFINS, returns this year has already -- or have already taken place. We started out that 12-month period in March, based on that year tariff revision plan. From that point on, that criteria hasn't been defined. That's up to ANEEL. And finally, as to the reorganization, we don't see any reason for any intervention because the reorganization is from the holding company, not the distribution company. And on top of that, Light is a company that is solvent with all its quality measures, all its industries, obligations, unlike reorganizations of energy companies in the past, those were companies that were under a lot of stress operationally speaking. We -- on the contrary, we are operating normally. And that's what's important for the regulatory agency. ANEEL should concentrate on service quality expansion investments and solvency, that is one of the top objectives of our reorganization. We want to maintain our solvency for Light SESA.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#23

Gustavo Faria from Bank of America asks the following question.

Gustavo Faria

analyst
#24

Just a follow-up on question. Do you have a time frame for the RT analysis of ANEEL? And you share your EBITDA or your EBITDA increase once ANEEL accepts the request? if they do not accept that request, what other regulatory mechanisms can you resort to?

Octavio Cortes Lopes

executive
#25

Gustavo, thank you for your question. The RTE process does not have a predefined course. We believe it's going to take 6 months, give or take. All the details of their requests are public. It's worth taking a look at. But our request is for an EBITDA of BRL 500 million. As to other regulatory request, just like I said before. In that regulatory tariff framework, we requested an increase in losses transferred to the tariff. We believe that once we renew the concession -- this is a singularity. We have a very expressive SRO stake, and that should be addressed once we renew that concession. Thank you.

Rodrigo Vilela

executive
#26

We would like to thank you all for attending our call, and the entire IR team is available to clarify any questions you may have. Have a good day to your time. Thank you. [Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Light S.A. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Light S.A. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.