Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 19, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Adam Seiden
analystWell, thanks, everyone. I think we're jumping right into it. I know some sessions ran long last time, unfortunately, I'm to blame for at least one of those. So thank you, everyone, for joining us here. My name is Adam Seiden, I'm the U.S. Machinery and Construction Analyst at Barclays. Joining us today for this session is Lincoln Electric. From Lincoln is CFO, Vince Petrella, and we also have from the IR team, Amanda Butler on the audience. So the format of this session, like many of the other ones, it's going to be a fireside chat between Vince and I. We'll certainly leave some time towards the end of the session, if there's folks in the audience that have questions themselves. What we'll also do is we'll do an audience response questions. We'll probably do that a bit later in the session here and then I'll go from there.
Adam Seiden
analystSo I guess, maybe to start, Vince, if there's just maybe a very quick overview on Lincoln Electric, in essence, what you guys do for those that are less familiar in the audience, and then we could jump in.
Vincent Petrella
executiveAll right. So Lincoln Electric, a company that's been around now for 125 years. We're the leader in our space. It's the arc welding and cutting space. We're a global firm. We did about $3 billion of turnover in 2019. Our operating profit margins came in about 13%. We had a year where our volumes were down, finishing the year, mid-single digits. We're experiencing some compression in some of our largest markets currently in automotive and heavy equipment. But our products go just about anywhere, where 2 pieces of metal are being put together. We also have a cutting part of our business. So metals need to be cut before they're joined. The 2 biggest lines of our business are the equipment or the power source and also the consumables or the filler metals. And so we have a solutions-based approach. We have deep knowledge in metallurgical science and joining of metals. And so we're one of the few players in the industry that can offer a complete solution to our customers. We go through 2 basic channels, direct to end users and also the distribution channel. We sell about roughly 40% through end use directly to big OEMS. And then distribution is roughly 60%, 65% of our business. And that's a rough -- some sketch of Lincoln Electric in the arc welding and cutting industry.
Adam Seiden
analystWell, that was very good.
Vincent Petrella
executiveVery efficient.
Adam Seiden
analystVery, very efficient. So maybe let's -- diving right into it. And one of the things that we're talking about with a lot of our industrial companies is the line of sight towards potentially a turn in the market. It's certainly been -- as you said, there's been some challenges. There's been decelerating trends, if not negative, even growth for some companies over the last year actually or 2. So for yourself, we -- none of us have a crystal ball, but I would love if you could look into your crystal ball and see is the bottom in sight? And then what does that mean for volumes as we pace through 2020?
Vincent Petrella
executiveRight. So the way we like to think about our markets are in 2 dimensions. One, we think about our markets from a geographic perspective, and then we think about our markets, from an end market sector perspective. So starting with end market sectors, 2 of our more important end market sectors are automotive and heavy industries, heavy fabrication. So the folks that make things like heavy equipment, mining equipment, construction equipment, shipbuilding, things like that. And those 2 markets are roughly 35%, 40% of our total end markets. And those 2 markets have been relatively soft during the course of 2019 and have remained soft moving into 2020. A market that is fairly large for us is the energy, oil and gas market. That market has been relatively stable in the fourth quarter of 2019 and has moved into 2020 roughly flat to the prior year. Geographically, certainly, North America and the Americas has been the standout during the course of 2019. Our weaker markets have been internationally in Europe and in Asia. China has been softer in the course of most of 2019. Again, biggest markets in China, even disproportionately more important to us than the Americas and globally are automotive and heavy industries. And those 2 areas have continued to be soft into the first quarter. So January of 2020 has been -- was operating at basically the same year-over-year run rates as the fourth quarter exiting December. And that's down volumes, mid-single digits. I would tell you that the Americas is slightly better than that. And international is slightly worse than that. So the Americas continues to show a little bit more resilience than what we've seen in other parts of the world. It's probably worth muddying up the outlook with what's been discussed, I'm sure, in all the meetings today, and that's coronavirus.
Adam Seiden
analystCoronavirus.
Vincent Petrella
executiveYes. You read my mind. Didn't you? And so I really view that as uncertainty. At Lincoln Electric, we have 5 facilities in China. Most of those facilities have been shut down since the Chinese New Year. We have a couple of those facilities that are operating on a limited schedule right now. But my view of first quarter and first half of the year in China is that we have $160 million, $170 million book of business. It's mid-single-digit to high single-digit operating profit, profitable. I think first quarter we'll likely record losses in China because of the lack of production and covering our fixed overheads. I think, Adam, remains to be seen what the second quarter looks like. But certainly, the longer this goes on, where we're not operating. And China, Inc. is not operating at its normal capacity levels. It becomes more likely that there will be a knock-on effect to the worldwide logistics and supply chain channels. So I'm a little concerned over how long this disruption will occur and the knock-on effects that it might have on our business. Having said that, I believe that the first half is going to be challenging for Lincoln and many other industrials as we work our way through that uncertainty, but a little bit more optimistic about the second half of the year, knowing that this industrial compression has now gone on -- will have gone on for more than 6 quarters. The average industrial compression is roughly 6 quarters. Hopefully, second half of the year, some of these headwinds will convert into tailwinds, including our automation business that has been soft during the course of '19, and it represents roughly 15% of our total book of business. We view automation as part of our portfolio that will afford us a higher long-term growth opportunity. We believe that growth opportunity should get back on track as automotive and heavy industries turn back to a stabilization in a growth mode. So I'm looking more to the second half, concerned about the first half being challenged by those headwinds, including the coronavirus.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. On just -- you've run coronavirus, of course. So when you think about the supply chain, I think you said there's still a lot of uncertainty how that all pans out. Is there a way to think about like what you currently have in stock today where you're sitting? So if there are some disruptions, like how big of an impact that could be or...
Vincent Petrella
executiveYes, so my view is just understanding supply chains and the length of supply chains from Asia to other parts of the world, understanding now that we're in our third, fourth week of shutdown, including the Chinese New Year, which is obviously planned for. It's my view that another 2, 3 weeks of this, we will start to see a broader impact on global supply chains that inventories are clearly being worked down to the extent that we have inventory in the supply chains. And I think if we're not back up to 100% type of pre-Chinese New Year, coronavirus shutdowns, we'll start to see a more pronounced impact on global manufacturing and supply chain. So I'm hopeful that as the incidence of the virus starts to decline, that we can continue to see manufacturing facilities ramp up in China and avoid the greater and more pronounced impact of a prolonged shutdown.
Adam Seiden
analystSo when you think into that second half, and you mentioned a bunch of tailwinds that could get you there, like what sort of leading indicators would you look at within the business? Is there even -- if you think of the 2 sides of your business, consumables equipment, is there one that tends to react first when things are moving?
Vincent Petrella
executiveSo we look very closely at ISM or the Purchasing Manager Indices worldwide. We look at industrial production, but it's interesting that we've seen some improvement in European ISM. We do have a lag in our business, Adam, that you know that could take 4 to 6 months for us to respond. So I'm not getting too excited for the first quarter and maybe even the second quarter. If we see a sustainable improvement in European Purchasing Indices, we should start to see that come through the latter part of the second quarter and into the third quarter. So we'll continue to watch that. It's pretty early on. It's still below 50. We have had a tick up now for, I believe, a couple of months, but we'll be watching that as well as industrial production. And maybe the last when we look at our commodity prices and oil prices. So oil prices, commodity prices rising, tend to have some positive impact on our business on a lag basis as well.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. So there's -- clearly, you guys are in a cyclical industry. I cover cyclical industries, and Lincoln's been through these cycles before, and the seen volumes go up, and in this case down. So what's differentiated this cycle for Lincoln versus some of the prior ones? And I only say that because the flow-through rates have been a little bit different over the last couple of quarters here.
Vincent Petrella
executiveI think -- so the biggest differences are on a product line basis, we're more heavily exposed to automation. Automation, again, is about $450 million of our $3 billion business. It tends to be a more cyclical business on the downside. We believe it has a higher growth trajectory on the upside, high single-digit type of long-term growth opportunities there. So on the downside, we're seeing that more pronounced impact. But we are also seeing unique to Lincoln, we believe, a stronger performance in the equipment side of our business. So our -- we're known as innovators in our industry. We have a very strong R&D and product development pipeline. We've actually held up better than what would be expected in this type of environment, with a flattish equipment sales performance in the fourth quarter compared to our consumable filler metals being down high single digits. And that's unusual in studying our performance over many cycles back to the 1970s. When you have consumables down high single digits, the expectation should be that equipment would be down mid-teens or almost double. And we think that some of our competitors around the world are experiencing that based on anecdotal conversations that we've had with the competitive marketplace, and we believe that some of our larger competitors are having declines on their equipment portfolio. And that's purely because of Lincoln's performance and not necessarily anything we believe that's different in the marketplace.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. So on pricing, we've gone through an interesting period here where beyond just normal course pricing, there were certainly some surcharges that were put through by the company and a lot of peers across industrials, so the price comps have been challenging as those roll off. But could you talk a little bit about the forward trajectory on price in that volume backdrop that you laid out for us earlier. And just more generally, as far as your pricing philosophy over the course of the year?
Vincent Petrella
executiveAll right. So we did put surcharges on last year because of the 25% steel tariffs that went in on steel in the U.S. We're able to roll those back the early part of the third quarter of 2019. So they will -- those surcharges will anniversary themselves in the third quarter. But you will see because we peel those off, and particularly in the Americas, there's negative year-over-year pricing impact. I believe that once we get to the second half of the year, as long as we're in this type of a softer environment with mid-single-digit sort of declines exiting the first half, that we'll probably have some very modest price increases ex those steel tariff pricing adjustments that were on our book of business in the prior year. So I think we'll probably have tens of basis points of price by putting through some modest equipment pricing increases. And then we'll have to look and see what the inflationary impact on the consumable side of our business is and judge whether or not we need price increases there. But I think second half of the year, I'm looking at very modest pricing improvement in the face of a softer type of environment. Lincoln's performance and price management, I think, has been very good through cycles. We tend to move pricing very quickly when we see inflation, or we see tight supply markets. And historically, if you look at our performance, we're pretty good at matching increased input costs with price increases and then hanging on to those increases as long as possible through the cycle. So our price/cost management, I think, has been a bright spot for the company through cycles.
Adam Seiden
analystExcellent. Maybe we'll -- we're about the halfway mark here. So maybe we'll move to the audience response questions. While those are pulling up. So on everybody's table here, there's a Blackberry-looking device. We would love for your participation. Do you currently own this stock? Yes, overweight; yes, market weight; yes, underweight; or four, no. [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystI wonder what your answer is. No. All right. Question number two, what is your general bias towards the stock right now? Positive, negative or neutral. [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystOkay. Question number three. In your opinion, through-cycle EPS growth for Lincoln Electric will be above peers, in line with peers or below peers? [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystOkay. Question number four. In your opinion, what should Lincoln Electric do with excess cash? Bolt-on M&A, larger M&A, share repos, dividends, pay down or internal investment? [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystWhile that's going. Certainly, you guys have had quite a nice track record of doing a little bit of everything.
Vincent Petrella
executiveWe have. I think our capital allocation program is very well balanced. I'll tell you, even -- that's very interesting. It wasn't going to be my answer, but yes.
Adam Seiden
analystVery well.
Vincent Petrella
executiveSo I'll tell you the priorities that we have for our -- do we have more questions? Or...
Adam Seiden
analystYes.
Vincent Petrella
executiveOkay. Well, I'll come back to it.
Adam Seiden
analystOkay. Question number five. In your opinion, on what multiple of 2020 earnings should Lincoln Electric trade? Bands from less than 10 up to higher than 21x. [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystPretty explicit, but PE. Okay. And question number six, what do you see is the most significant share price headwind facing Lincoln Electric? Core growth, margin performance, capital deployment or execution strategy? [Voting]
Adam Seiden
analystHave the executives fill these out before half.
Vincent Petrella
executiveWe do.
Adam Seiden
analystThat's -- all right, a pretty even split. Okay, on core growth and execution. All right. I don't know if you want to go maybe give us your thought over capital allocation...
Vincent Petrella
executiveSo why those answers are wrong on capital allocation and don't aligned with the company is that we believe very strongly that the best returns on our capital investment is internal CapEx spending. And through a long track record of investing in our business, we find that we have our highest returns on capital. If we invest in growth or improving our efficiencies or taking out costs. And that's our number one priority is trying to find as many capital projects that we can possibly invest behind, is we're going to be able to maintain a very high return on invested capital and IRR for the business? Secondly, is we want to deploy our capital and growing the business inorganically? So we're looking for all M&A opportunities that, one, fit our strategy; and two, are priced appropriately. And that's -- that can be challenging in the marketplace today. And based on the fact that Lincoln is fairly narrowly focused on this arc welding and cutting industry. So once you run the screens of what really fits our strategy, an attractive business, good management team, differentiated products. And then we have to get over the hurdle of an appropriately priced transaction. After that, then we look at returning cash to shareholders because we do want to grow the business, and we want to improve our margins and our returns on invested capital. And so we look at our dividend, and we look at our cash flow historical performance and future expectations. We generated over $400 million of CFO, cash flow from operations in 2019, which is a very good cash flow performance. Our cash conversion has been, on average, more than 100% for a very long period of time. And we look to deploy whatever is left over after internal growth initiatives and M&A towards that return to shareholders. So we look at what we're comfortable distributing. And right now, we are comfortable with distributing in dividends, 40% of our payout ratio on an annual basis within a range of 20% to 60%, understanding we're cyclical. And then the last thing we really look at is, is share buyback and using share buyback to adjust where we want our capital structure to end up with. And so our targets right now are having a gross debt-to-EBITDA of about 1.75 to 2x. We exited 2019 at roughly 1.6x. We recognize that we have an opportunity to continue to buy back shares to move that capital structure up into our range. But the final thing we think about is what our share price is trading at. And so we're going to be very opportunistic on when we move into that range, subject to some of the other uses of cash and reinvesting in the business. But at the end of the day, it's likely that we will move into that 1.75 to 2x gross debt-to-EBITDA here over the near or intermediate term.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. And for those listening, we'll have the answers to the questions that we just asked earlier at the end of the conference. So getting back to margins and incremental so you guys spoke to in the last -- in the last call about putting through mid- to high teens run rate dollar savings by second half from some cost actions. If volumes were today in the range that you're speaking about, would that be enough to drive -- or would that be enough to drive flow through back to the traditional, call it, 20%, 25% framework? Or do you think you need a little bit above and beyond pricing as well?
Vincent Petrella
executiveWell, in order to achieve our incremental, so 20% to 25%, we're going to need some positive volume delivery. And I would tell you that if we get any kind of volume improvement, low single digits to mid-single digits, we'll be able to deliver that easily. I think there's upside to that based on the restructurings and rationalization actions that we've taken across our international portfolio of businesses to rightsize the manufacturing footprint and take out costs to match our cross profile with our business and capacity utilization level. So I'm very comfortable with that 20% to 25% at some fairly low volume improvement on a year-over-year basis.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. And on the decremental side, would there be...
Vincent Petrella
executiveDecremental side. If you take automation, so this part of our business. But if you take out automation, we were in the teens from a decremental perspective because automation had a challenging finish to the year. But I think automation, if it turns around, we should see some good incrementals out of that. But at the end of the day, we had a dilution to our decremental performance because of the automation business in the fourth quarter and second half of the year.
Adam Seiden
analystGot it. So on market share, do you -- curious as to where you see the market developing. You see further consolidation of the broader welding market going further, is that even possible, given your standings in the various markets? And then also maybe focusing a little bit on Europe. How has the European market changed or a bit similar following your acquisition of the Air Liquide assets?
Vincent Petrella
executiveYes. So from a market share perspective, our view would be that over the long term, there are 3 big full line providers of arc welding equipment and consumables. And those 3 providers control roughly 40% of the global market. If you observe the performance organically of those 3 players, the 3 biggest players take a very small market share on an annual basis over a very long period of time. So I think that will continue to occur, but at a very slow pace. There is also the opportunity for inorganic consolidation, and that will continue to happen as well. I believe that will happen at a relatively slow pace as well. But both of those are both organically, the full line solution providers as well as the ability to roll up some of the smaller companies in our industry will continue to lead to consolidation. But it's fair to say it will be very slow. Having said that, in Europe, Europe is one of the more fragmented markets. It was our hope that acquiring Air Liquide would take a little bit of that excess capacity out of the market and give us an opportunity to bring some of their market-leading and brand-recognized products into our portfolio and vice versa to run those products through both of our respective distribution channels and end user relationships. And I think it's still too early to conclude that that's been highly successful. But we do see improvements in our sell-through of both Air Liquide and Lincoln Electric products through those channels. So I think it, over the long term, is a good start towards rationalizing the European marketplace, but there's still, I believe, a fairly long way to go on that with that regard.
Adam Seiden
analystSo on acquisitions, one of the areas where you have been a bit more acquisitive, has been on the automation side. You've had a couple of bolt-ons here and there. Roughly -- and then you also spoke to some headwinds for the automation business in 2019. So roughly how large is the automation business stand today? And then does the sluggishness of the market change at all your resolve, or your strategy toward -- around automation and how you've gone about it?
Vincent Petrella
executiveNo. So our business is about $450 million of our total $3 billion of market size sales last year. We still very strongly believe that over the long term, automation will grow at a much higher rate than our core business. The estimates and -- by market research firms would suggest high single-digit growth over the longer term. It's inevitable that manual and semiautomatic processes will be replaced by fully automated processes. It's not just in arc welding and cutting and in our industry. It's across the industrial spectrum. And so we're highly confident that we've made the right move into that market. We recognize that that move is both a offensive and a defensive move. We have to be there to defend our customer base to -- for loss towards integrators or other competitors that might have that offering, and we think it's offensive in order to be aggressive with maybe customers that aren't in the fold right now and the ability to offer automated solutions will give us, we believe, a long-term advantage in our marketplace. So we -- our resolve has not changed at all regarding automation, despite some of the softness that we've seen in 2019. And when we entered this market space more aggressively, we're very open about talking about the fact that this would be more cyclical. It's a more capital-intensive type of business. Our equipment historically has been more cyclical than our filler metals consumable business. So what's happening now is no surprise to us at all. And we understand that there's some concentration and exposures towards automotive and heavy industries. So this is part of the plan and the playbook, and it does not affect at all our long-term view of the opportunity that's in front of us from an automation perspective.
Adam Seiden
analystExcellent. And if there's any questions from the audience, feel free to raise your hand. This is your last opportunity. Maybe the last one for me. Just you've talked about a little bit of the mix of the portfolio, and we talked about automation, et cetera. So some of your peers are a bit more bent towards -- one way or the other towards equipment and consumables, certainly, you have your own mix. For yourselves and where you sit today, why is it important to keep the mix that you have today? Or is there some evolution that you would expect over time?
Vincent Petrella
executiveLook, I think it's a great question to finish it off. We believe that our mix and our exposure is the best balanced in our industry. So we generally track the annual sales of equipment and consumables in the whole of the industry. And so we're -- we think we're the best balanced. We can go to the market in many of our end market segments and offer a full suite of equipment and consumables. And we'll certainly tweak that mix towards what we believe is the more differentiated, higher margin, higher return opportunities. But we like our positioning in that we've had the best balance in our opinion of anybody in the industry, bar none.
Adam Seiden
analystExcellent. All right. So with that, thank you, Vince. Thank you, Amanda, and Lincoln Electric.
Vincent Petrella
executiveThank you, Adam.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.