Lottomatica Group S.p.A. (LTMC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 28, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood morning. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the Lottomatica Group's H1 2026 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Mirko Senesi, Head of IR of Lottomatica. Please go ahead, sir.
Mirko Senesi
executiveThanks, operator, and good morning to everyone. Welcome to Lottomatica Q2 2026 results presentation. I'm here today with our CEO, Guglielmo Angelozzi; and our CFO, Laurence Van Lancker. Now the floor directly to Guglielmo for the presentation. Guglielmo, please.
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveThanks, Mirko, and good morning to everybody. Let's go up Page 2 of the deck. Another very good quarter and another very good semester. We increased EBITDA 14% reported, 17% on a normalized basis in the quarter, which means 10% for the semester on a reported basis, recovering a chunk of the payout issue that the market had in Q1 and 20% increase on a normalized basis for the entire semester. Even better for the online, of course, which is growing 21% in the semester at a reported level and 24% for the quarter and 25% at a normalized level. So very strong results in terms of EBITDA. Even more so in terms of margins, which increased 2 points in the semester at group level from 37% to 39% and mainly driven by the increase -- consistent increase in the online profitability from 54% to 58%. Page #3 of the presentation, what are the drivers of this growth, the same which we've had in the last 10 years, basically. Strong market growth, 12% in overall online. June peaks at 19%. Of course, very strong iGaming performance, but also sports has been very strong on the bets because we -- the market has suffered in Q1 for the payout. We continue to increase market share when you look at the trend line, both on a year-to-year comparison and on a quarter-to-quarter comparison in iSports, iGaming and overall online. So let's draw -- let's try to draw a conclusion out of these strong results. A conclusion on the results. There is consistency of growth in adjusted EBITDA. We are on Page 4 of the presentation. We've been growing every -- I mean, quarter over the same quarter of the previous year, every single quarter in the last 10 years, of course, except during the COVID restrictions. So consistently looks like an appropriate word for this. Page #5, consistency again in results. We've consistently grown in margins. This company started a little more than 10 years ago with 12% margin. We have transformed this company in a 39% margin, mix efficiencies, all sort of levers that you can use in this type of cases. And of course, the online also has been a key driver, not only in terms of mix, but also in terms of internal efficiencies because the very first profitability of online was 21% back in 2017 and today is 58%. Also, when you look at the latest quarters, that you can see on the graph on the right, you can see that notwithstanding the fact that we have consolidated assets with a much lower -- structurally lower profitability like PWO, we've offset that. So we've been able to fully integrate these assets. This is the example of PWO, but there are others also within the business model of the group and consistently recover the profitability and bring that to the level of the group. So this was about consistency of results, which has been driven by the consistency of the drivers underlying these results. Page #6 the first driver and the most important of all, of course, is the market. The market -- the online market has been growing consistently in the last 10 years. And after COVID is pretty stable in the mid-double-digit range. At the same time, on a competitive basis, we've been increasing our market share. There have been periods where the market share has been growing faster, others where it has been growing slightly slower, but the trend line is very clear. In a mix of organic growth and M&A, we've gone from a marginal operator to the nominal to the largest operator in the market. This is also true, as you see in Page #7 in the latest quarters when you reduce the granularity and look at it on a month or quarterly basis, so on a smaller -- on a shorter period. You can see, of course, ups and downs, glitches, especially in sports, where you also have the payout, which is impacting the market share depending on the brand and on the business model, but the trend line is also very clear. Page #8, an update on PWO. It continues to go the direction we've mentioned in the previous quarter. Sport is not only recovered, but is above the previous levels before migration. And we're doing -- also, we're also -- we also continue to work on the iGaming. The important point is that we've been focusing on a proper balance between market share and growth and profitability. Market share has to be sustainable. We've cleaned up part of our customer base, limiting abuses, optimizing the bonuses, shutting down unprofitable bonuses campaigns. And that's why we basically doubled the company -- the brand is very healthy. Has done a good journey from the migration and it's doing double the EBITDA. That's pretty much the story. When we go to the other important trend of this last couple of years, Page #9, the consolidation of the tails, this continues. It continues on an organic basis, and it continues because we consolidate some of the smaller operators, but this happens also because we offer a very compelling environment for them to continue to grow as entrepreneurs more than they would do on a stand-alone basis. Last but not least, Page #10, the recap of how this all works. Now this is all about compounding returns. We have a yield of our free cash flow, which if you measure that basically from IPO to today, has been on average 8%. On top of this, the company has been growing. So the growth rate of this levered free cash flow has been in the same period, 26% CAG, talking about CAG. So basically, you get an excess of -- well in excess of 30% of total returns on average CAG in that 30%, sorry, in that period of time. How did we also use that 8%? We gave it back to our shareholders through distributions. Even more that then -- that 8%, you can see the example of the last year. On average, we have generated 8%, but we've given back in the last year more than 10% between dividends and buybacks because we could do more buyback because of the 26% growth, which gave us incremental leverage capacity. So strong compounding returns and use of the returns to provide enhanced distributions to our shareholders. Now I'll leave the floor to Laurence for the second part of the presentation. Thank you.
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveThank you, Guglielmo. Moving on to Page 12, the group financial highlights. You can see on the left-hand side how revenues have grown plus 5% in the first half. And in Q2, on a reported basis, plus 6% and plus 8% on a normalized basis. On the right-hand side, you see how overall EBITDA has grown plus 10% in the first half, also taking into account -- on a reported basis, taking into account the impact of the sports payout. And in Q2, we've grown at plus 14% on a reported basis and plus 17% on a normalized basis with normalized payout. Also, looking at EBITDA margin, it has increased over at the group level by almost 2%, by 2 percentage points. And this has been driven by the online -- by mix effect, given online has -- at a higher margin has grown faster than the other 2 segments. It's the effect of the run rate synergies that we completed last year. And finally, also the effect of the cost efficiencies realized in the first half of this year. On Page 13, on the left-hand side, you'll see how online continues to remain our engine of growth with growth in revenues on a normalized basis of 17%. Sports game -- Sports Franchise continues to grow very nicely on a normalized basis of plus 9% and when you look at it on an adjusted EBITDA basis, you'll see that on a normalized basis, online has grown at plus 27% and Sports Franchise at plus 18%, while gaming has been broadly flat. In terms of margins, now online is now hovering at 58% in the first half, with Sports Franchise at around 25.5% and Gaming Franchise at 24%. Going on to Page 14. On the left-hand side, you can see the total amount of CapEx spent, both recurring and concession, amounting to EUR 80 million, broadly in line with what we spent last year, circa 7% of total revenues. And on the right-hand side, operating cash flow, which achieved a growth of plus 12%, slightly higher than EBITDA growth given the leverage effect on CapEx. If you look at Page 15, you can see the net leverage that has stayed broadly constant at 2.3 turns. And this is -- so when you go through the bridge, you start from EUR 2.051 billion of net financial debt as at 31st of March. You have the -- other than adjusted EBITDA, you have a positive effect of the net working capital then taxes paid of EUR 75 million. CapEx, which include also the one-off CapEx and growth CapEx of including also bolt-ons of EUR 16 million that amounted in total to EUR 57 million. Financial expenses and leases that include also the cost of refinancing that we've done in the second quarter a total of EUR 65 million. We've bought back EUR 58 million in shares and paid a dividend of EUR 101 million. And then other costs that primarily include the extraordinary items in relation to the closure of the Serbian branch as well as the bolt-on -- the minority acquisitions and puts that were exercised in the second quarter. This is in total to achieve a net financial debt of EUR 2.11 billion with taking into account the cash amount of EUR 366 million gets a net financial leverage of 2.3x, so in line with Q1. And with that, we've completed the presentation.
Operator
operatorWould you like to begin the Q&A session? [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Ed Young of Morgan Stanley.
Edward Young
analystI've got 3, if that's okay. The first is on the World Cup. You've not really isolated it during the presentation, but wonder if you could talk about the impact on the business and where it came versus your expectations for acquisition, player engagement and mix on the business. Second of all, in online, your GGR revenue conversion was noticeably strong in the quarter and perhaps a little bit counterintuitive given the World Cup I just mentioned. So can you talk perhaps a little bit about your promotional strategy and more broadly about the competitive intensity in the market that you're seeing? And then finally, online EBITDA margins obviously stepped up and you mentioned Serbia. You presented it today as this continuous long-term improvement in margins. So should we be thinking about this as a new normal level with scope to improve? Or is it something that could end up being lower in other quarters as you retain flexibility to invest in the business? Just trying to think about the operational gearing, how you think about the target for the -- in online.
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSure. Ed, I'll take this. On the World Cup, it's been in line -- ultimately in line with expectations. This was also included in the guidance that we've given in the -- for the full year. So we -- the numbers that we've done in the second quarter are pretty bang, I would say, pretty bang in line with what we expected. As we said also in other -- I think in other forms, it doesn't really move too much the needle at an EBITDA level. And it's anyway factored in the -- it was factored in the guidance range. Online GGR, I mean, in here, we've -- I think we also mentioned it on the slide with Planetwin. We've been -- we've continued to maintain good discipline in our promotional activity. So we are focused on, obviously, on growth, but also especially on profitable growth. And so this -- the results that you see reflect also this approach. Thirdly, I think on online margin, I'd say we are -- we've probably gone a little bit faster in terms of, in terms of margin growth than we originally anticipated. This is because a number of things happened in the meantime. We've made our structure more cost, let's say, more efficient. In terms of -- I think in terms of guidance, I'd say that probably mid-50s is probably won't hold. As we mentioned earlier, we'll be a notch above that. There may be quarters -- as you know, there is always some volatility due to payout. So there may be quarters we may be lower on EBITDA margins. But I think we are trending in a direction which is in line with what we're seeing now. So it is -- it reflects the, let's say, a rebased cost structure that is sustainable in the medium term.
Edward Young
analystJust to come back on the promotional intensity point, it was quite a big step-up sequentially. So I understand the commentary there is around profitable growth. But is that sort of ongoing mindset for here? Or is there other noise in the quarter that we should be aware of, whether it's tax mix or anything else that could have affected that number?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSo when you talk about the numbers, which number are you referring to exactly, Ed?
Edward Young
analystOnline GGR to revenue conversion.
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveYes. No, no, no. It's -- we have had -- if you look at it, remember, in the -- we have been -- we had done also some also additional cleanups as we mentioned, from a -- so we are a bit more -- not a bit more, but we have always maintained discipline. We have had a number of cleanups as well during the quarter. So I don't necessarily think that we'll stay at these levels, but it is sort of an indication that we want to remain disciplined on all the promotional activity.
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveMaybe a quick comment, a quick additional integration to this. These big events are good acquisition tools, as we always said. But you have to distinguish between acquiring clients which are then there to stay and acquiring clients that disappear immediately after. You not necessarily want to deploy a lot of money on the second group, which is about discipline. So that's another point I'd like to stress.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Estelle Weingrod of JPMorgan.
Estelle Weingrod
analystI've got a couple of questions as well. The first one on online margins, just to come back to Ed's question. I mean what are the key drivers of further improvement from here? And how much of that is like structural cost efficiency versus operating gearing? And another one on the retail concession framework. Is it still the case that an agreement could happen in August? And if so, when do you see the earliest cash outflow, please?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSo I can take the first. I mean, I think, Estelle, we've always been, as you know, a bit cautious always in guiding to further improvements. I think the levels which we are now is, let's say, level we're comfortable with going forward. But I would not bake in further margin improvements for the time being. Do we have operating leverage? Yes. Are there any further cost efficiencies potentially materializing in the future? Possibly. But if those were to materialize, we'll talk about them when we do them. But I think that we are, I would say, relatively comfortable with the levels we've achieved now.
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveYes, Estelle on the retail concessions, look, it's very hard to say. The reality is that whether they -- whether you have an agreement or not, basically nothing changes. The outcome is exactly the same in the next 2 to 3 years, which I think answers to the second part of your questions because the reality is whether you don't have the framework, the agreement or you have it tomorrow morning, you will need, in any case, to have an extension of the current concessions for a couple of years, maybe 3 now, depending on how you want to phase it. But that's a bare minimum that you need to go from -- that you need to bridge from an agreement tomorrow morning and the awarding and so the payment of the of the next concessions. So long story short, whether you have that tomorrow or you don't have it, what happens in the next couple of years, 3 years probably is going to be exactly the same. Just think about the reform of the online. You had the law in March '24, and you got the concession in November '25. So for one product, pretty easy, straightforward like the online, it took 18 months. And these are 2, not to say 3 because you also have bingos there, complex tenders. And with the involvement of local regulation for the distribution, it's going to take much more than that. So one way or the other, what happens tomorrow and for the next 2 to 3 years before you get to the new concession is going to look exactly the same in the 2 scenarios.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Pravin Gondhale of Barclays.
Pravin Gondhale
analystFirstly, can you comment on current trading trends into July and whether the momentum has remained broadly consistent with Q2? And then secondly, on the sort of proportion of market share there, which is -- in online, which is up for grab, has there any sort of change in your views that what could ultimately come -- become available following the sort of concessions here given the intensity that you have seen in the World Cup and then the progress of BW market share wins here?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSo Pravin, I think this current trading in July, there's -- obviously, the numbers haven't come out, but the trends continue to remain solid. So there's nothing to note there. So far, so good. On the market share, is your question is do we have -- I think from our perspective, the views in terms of what is up for grabs has not changed. So it remains consistent with what we said in the past. In addition to that, as Guglielmo pointed also earlier, we're focused on growth and especially profitable growth. So we will remain disciplined in how we continue to grow.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Charlie Muir-Sands of BNP Paribas.
Charlie Muir-Sands
analystI have 2, please. Firstly, just with respect to the buyback, I saw in the bridge that the spend in the quarter was only about EUR 58 million down on the acceleration that we saw at the beginning of the year. I just wondered, given where the share price is and the leverage, what your considerations were with respect to the pace of execution of the capital return program? And secondly, just with respect to some of your recent small bolt-ons, eGaming and Sportbet, can you just remind us now where they sit within your statutory and adjusted revenues, EBITDA, net income?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSure. I can take them both. On the buyback, the EUR 58 million is -- reflects the fact that we had to stop the buyback for, I think, around 3 weeks because we had to wait for the new -- for the new approval -- the approval from the EGM. So technically, in order to be able to extend the buyback beyond the original limit and to the new limit that we've approved in the latest EGM, you have to stop. So it's not a sort of conscious slowdown because we want to spend less. And this is a -- the buyback is executed based on an amount that we give to the bank and the bank does it autonomously. But we reiterate that we will -- that the same message we said in the previous results presentations, which is we are planning to buy back up to EUR 700 million this year and next year. From -- in terms of bolt-ons right now, so in the statutory accounts, you will not see anything other than an investment. So it's an equity investment. And -- but in the adjusted EBITDA, we've shown -- we've added the contribution of Sportbet today. And it's still -- I mean, it is immaterial to our numbers.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Clark Lampen of BTIG.
William Lampen
analystMaybe first, I wanted to follow up on the question that was asked, I think, sort of 2 previously around share. If we were to look at the iGaming business, I think you've been running steady in the sort of low 30s, maybe 32% this quarter and last. Was there any impact from the World Cup and players wagering more on competitor platforms or with your sports business more than iGaming this quarter that might have impacted those numbers? Or did you see market-wide that the same trends were fairly uniform for your competitors? And then second question is a little bigger picture. When we think about AI integration and impact to your business, I'm curious, as we look at the back half of the year, specifically, do you see just sort of very high level, more opportunity on the revenue side of the business for optimization? Or is there more near-term optimization opportunity on the cost side?
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveClark, I'll take this. So well, the pocket of the player is a certain amount, and there's a lot of overlap between sports and iGaming, especially in moments where there is occasional gaming like in the big events. So clearly, if sport flies, iGaming is impacted. And it depends on why sport flies, sports flies on occasional events and you focus a lot on occasional players, then clearly, that has an impact. But as you could see iGaming growth remain pretty much the same. And so the fundamentals of sports growth in some of retail and online. So short answer in the very short term, yes, because there is a correlation. You will find that mathematically. And -- but it's like basically short-term dynamics, which do not alter the trend, which we continue to see exactly the way we have represented it so far. On the second point, which is AI integration, we think that the -- by far, the largest impact of this will be on the revenue side. We have a huge number of projects and already active agents that are working on the top line side and get improved release after release. We mentioned several times talking about risk management and better acceptance, talking about the casino presentation offer and pricing, talking about the communication, automation of communication to -- and promotions to players, the intensity of the bonuses, so much stuff, which is related to the top line. But clearly, across -- and this is to the business, across the entire company, there's a lot also around productivity, which is also very important and can be very material on the cost side. And -- but I wouldn't say one is long term, the other is short term. Also the agents and the applications on the top line are already up and running. It's not that one is -- revenues is long term, the other. It's -- we're working on both, and there are other opportunities will come on the content side from AI, which clearly work both on the cost side, how much you pay the content, how much content costs to us and how much -- and what's the quality of the content, so the top line driven by that content. So there's a long list. But clearly, the revenue side is more sexy and potentially larger. That is in a nutshell. We haven't provided a number yet on this topic because we want to accumulate experience and data points, but this is clearly something relevant, very relevant.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Ben Shelley of UBS.
Benjamin Shelley
analystI would like to go back to the online GGR to revenue conversion topic and potentially link it with this theme around AI. Are the tools and infrastructure you have around bonusing, are they improving? Is that sort of a big part of the driver here? Just love to hear more thoughts on that. And then on PWO, can you talk more about the market share development on the iGaming side? Where is that versus pre-migration levels? And how is that progressing?
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveYes. On the first point, as I said, we have tools which are up and running, but I wouldn't like to get on to the actual impact on that on that type of, the GGR to revenues conversion because, as I said, we want to have large and consistent set of data points before giving numbers and KPIs. It's already up and running, but I don't think we are at the point yet that we can disclose an impact or give a guidance on that. So I would prefer to confirm that it's there and it's relevant, but not to get into the -- early to get into the numbers. So PWO, maybe you want to comment, Laurence?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveYes. I mean PWO has performed extremely well on the -- particularly on the sports side, they're continuing to grow market share. So we're very happy with that, that went definitely beyond expectations. So we've gained 0.2 percentage market share pre -- compared to pre-migration levels. In iGaming, it's a journey. We had recovered half of what we had lost. We probably have another 0.5 percentage points to recover. So we're still hovering around those levels. Again -- and we tried sort of to stress this also on the slide, which shows the performance of PWO. We want to continue to grow market share profitably. So we're still on that journey, and we think the potential is there. But again, it is -- we'll see how long it takes. But when -- but whilst we do it, we care about the bottom line.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Domenico Ghilotti of Equita.
Domenico Ghilotti
analystA few questions. The first is on the Serbian branch restructuring. If you can provide some additional color on, first of all, if you have already booked all the cost in Q2 or you have some additional cost to be booked? And if the contribution -- the positive contribution was already, say, fully on stream in the second quarter if we have additional upside in the next quarters? Second question, well, just a clarification. So that the normalized tax rate was a bit higher in the semester. If you can reconfirm the expectation for the full year and next year?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveOkay. I can take those 2 quickly. So Serb, yes, the restructuring costs have been fully loaded in Q2. And then the numbers are -- also the benefits are already baked in EBITDA. With regards to taxation, this -- it's just a matter also of timing for the year. The full year taxation costs are broadly in line with consensus.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Chiara Pampurini of Intermonte.
Chiara Pampurini
analystI had a question. The first one is on the second half of the year. The guidance for the full year, again implies EBITDA growth above 10%. What are the main factors you expect to support growth in the second half? And if you still expect further synergies and efficiencies to come through in the second half of the year from [ PWO ]? And the second question is on the one-off CapEx. If you can give us some color on what are the main items that are included in the number of the second quarter?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSure. On the second half of the year, there is -- I mean, we -- there's not really much to say other than it support -- our estimates support the fact that we will have achieved sort of the upper part of the guidance. So we don't have any other sort of further efficiencies baked in other than what we've already done. If there will be something, we'll include it. But otherwise, there's nothing else in that. It's clear that H2 also is a stronger half than H1, given the seasonality of the business and how strong than Q4 is. So you have to factor in as well when you look at the seasonality of the business. In terms of one-off CapEx, they're predominantly bolt-ons and other investments we had to do in relation to the concession. These are the main items.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Richard Stuber of Deutsche Bank.
Richard Stuber
analystTwo, please, both on cash. The first is, I think you did EUR 385 million of operating free cash flow in the first half. It appears during the presentation that your priority is largely about shareholder returns. I know you did about EUR 110 million share buybacks, EUR 100 million of dividends. But what I'd like to know is a bit more about your appetite for using cash for M&A, particularly outside of Italy and if you've got any sort of thoughts there? And the second question on cash. I think Q2, you did EUR 114 million working capital inflow, which seems quite a lot. Can you just remind us what that relates to and whether that's sustainable and what your guidance for working capital is for the full year?
Laurence Van Lancker
executiveSure. Listen, so in terms of cash for M&A, I mean, we -- as I mentioned earlier to Chiara, we do -- we have a pipeline of bolt-ons, but they are domestic, where we have significantly value accretion deriving from the sort of the multiples at which we acquire businesses, which are below where we are trading today. So the -- internationally, we've -- I think we've said a number of times, whilst we do -- whilst we look at international opportunities, we're always focused on returns. And so far, we've -- the best returns have been achieved via buybacks. And so there's no change in view on that. With regards to second question on the working capital, the EUR 114 million, it reflects also the -- it reflects the seasonality of the business. Q2 tends to be a quarter which has very positive inflow due to change in working capital. That's because of how -- because we received back the 0.5% from the ADM and then we accumulate the gaming taxes of Imposta Unica. This then reverses in Q3 and which tends to be negative. And then in Q4, it's broadly flat, slightly negative. If you look at the history of our working capital movements, this is the Q3 -- Q2, sorry, is the quarter with the strongest cash inflow. And then you see reversals in the other quarters. So it is a seasonality effect.
Operator
operatorGentlemen, the last question is from Andrea Bonfa of Akros.
Andrea Bonfa
analystI hope you can hear me. Very quickly, I would like to have, let's say, your, let's say, general view on the residual market share of tailwinds operator. Do you expect that to gain market share from those operators is going to be more difficult or it's going to be standard or less difficult than what you already achieved so far? I mean, are these stronger operators, the one left today or they are even weaker than the one you already gained market share. Just if you can share your view with us.
Guglielmo Angelozzi
executiveI think, Andrea, there's a couple of points here. The point is not only acquire market share, but acquiring quality market share at a sustainable cost. So that's the key point, which is true both if you do that organically and if you do that through deals. When you do that through deals, the main driver is the quality of the counterpart. You want to do a deal with a counterpart, which has good quality and you can do -- so you have betting, you can do a journey for the long term. And when you do that organically, it's mainly about what type of customer base are you acquiring? Is that good bets or bad bets and what do you have to spend for that. So it's not -- I wouldn't say the difference is on the strength of the operator. I would say that is not the topic. The topic is more on the quality of the operator when you want to partner and the quality of the customer base when you want to acquire and the discipline at which you do that. So that's the real driver of the decisions more than the strength of the competitor. This is not about the strength of the competition. This is about the -- what you want to get. I hope this clarifies. That's the balance. It's more like an art more than a rule. But that's a very important point. I agree with you, but it depends on that.
Mirko Senesi
executiveThank you, operator. I think we are done with the question.
Operator
operatorPerfect. Thank you, gentlemen. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over, and you may disconnect your telephones.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Lottomatica Group S.p.A. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Lottomatica Group S.p.A. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.