Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 26, 2022
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Lynas Rare Earth's Full Year 2022 Results Investor Briefing. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I'd now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Ms. Jennifer Parker, Vice President, Corporate Affairs of Lynas Rare Earth. Please go ahead, ma'am.
Jennifer Parker
executiveGood morning, and welcome to the Lynas Rare Earth's Investor Briefing for the 2022 financial year. Today's briefing will be presented by Amanda Lacaze. And joining Amanda here in Sydney today are Gaudenz Sturzenegger, CFO; Pol Le Roux, VP Downstream; Daniel Havas, VP, Strategy and Investor Relations; and Sarah Leonard, General Counsel and Company Secretary. I'll now hand over to Amanda. Please go ahead, Amanda.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveGood morning, everybody. So we have a full court press here today. And so I think that should make for a very interesting call. You all get to hear from me quite a lot. But today, fortunately, I have many of my colleagues who can deal with any of the more gnarly questions that you might choose to ask. In particular, I have Pol Le Roux sitting next to me. Many of you know Pol and he's going to show himself.
Pol Le Roux
executiveHello, everyone.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveSo there he is. We're trying this as a video but it turns out that we really have to snuggle up close to each other to be able to do this really effectively. It's always polite to make an acknowledgment of country. I think for those of us in the minerals industry, it is even more important. We would like to acknowledge the traditional owners of the lands on which we live and work across Australia and particularly in Western Australia. We acknowledge and value Lynas' Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander employees, partners and communities. And we pay our respects to their elders past, present and emerging. We take this seriously in our business. It is not just a case of form over substance, and we are working hard to engage with our local communities, particularly in Kalgoorlie and Mt Weld to ensure that the prosperity that we're reporting today can be shared within the community. Well, what a year. For many of you, particularly the analysts who pour over our various results because of our quarterly reporting format, we don't have a lot of new news, although it is, of course -- sorry, I'm trying to move this along here. There we go. We don't have a lot of new news, but of course, we see this on an accounting basis. But notwithstanding that we don't have a lot of new news, I would like to just take a few moments to reflect on a fabulous year because after all of those years of very hard work of heavy lifting, it is a great time for us to be able to celebrate the reality of what, I think, I said to many of you who have been shareholders with us for many years, which is that we would be positioned to take full advantage of the benefit as the market picked up. So I'm going to spend a few moments on that and then really talk a lot about what next because to stand still is to go backwards. And so we are enthusiastically marching forward in our business to ensure that we are able to continue to generate prosperity for our business and for our shareholders as the market continues to grow. So of course, what were the high points in the year-to-date? A record profit. That seems to be an understatement when we look at $540.8 million in NPAT compared to last year's, which was, I think, also a record profit at $157 million, but it's certainly a significant uplift from there. Nearly $1 billion worth of sales. We did -- right through the year as we looked at our sales and operations planning process keep on having a chart which had $1 billion mark on the x axis -- sorry, on the y axis, and we were very keen that we should actually hit that. But there were certainly some challenges that we continued to face in terms of external environment. This, sort of , to us as we come a little bit short on that. EBITDA at $601 million and finishing the year with $965 million in the bank certainly made us very happy. What are the things, though, that we really are -- I don't spend a lot of nights these days lying awake at night in my bed worrying about the business, but I still spend the occasional night where I worry about the business. So what are the things that, maybe a better way to put it really, our key focus areas? First of all, production. Production was up in the year just passed. NdPr production was up 7.7%. We would have liked it to have been more than that. Our March quarter was particularly strong and gave us a great deal of confidence about our ability to be able to drive throughput, particularly through the land. But we do continue to manage some quite significant residual external challenges as a result of COVID. I'm sure that many of you, who have listened to lots of results presentations, will have heard about continuing logistics challenges. And for us, in Malaysia, we have an additional challenge, which is really about utilities, specifically water and the availability for that consistently within our business. Both of these things have seen us have to modify the way that we go about managing our production, including the addition of -- the addition of charter vessels in addition to our normal commercial shipping to ensure that we have material on the ground in Malaysia ready to be processed. But also with water we've put in place a number of mitigating strategies, but we're not always able to mitigate when the pipeline is dry. Of course, all of you, who have been to other results presentations, would have also had a lot of information on some of the challenges associated with costs. Certainly, we've had some extraordinary increases in the business particularly associated with the reagents that we use, sulfuric acid probably prime amongst those, where the prices increased by up to 100%. And so finding ways within our business to mitigate some of those extraordinary increases has been and remains a key focus for our organization. I think that alongside these excellent financial results, we have seen some really good progress in terms of a number of our ESG initiatives. It has remained through the FY '22 financial year and even today that we need to be focused on keeping our people safe through the pandemic, but also, of course, just our operational and process safety. We were delighted to have achieved a milestone of 100 days LTI-free at Mt Weld. But we continue to build our workforce. This is really important as we look at a continuing growth market that we are building our workforce in a way that really increases our capability. That means continuing to focus on diversity. We report a gender diversity because that's what the ASX requires, but it is not the only lens that we bring to diversity. As I mentioned earlier, we are working very hard, particularly in Kalgoorlie to engage with our local and potential indigenous employees and suppliers. And we are very pleased that we have been able to engage productively there, but there is more to be done. We certainly have seen significant improvements in gender diversity. And as we look at our statistics, I mean, clearly, to be able to get up to our target of at least 30% by the end of this financial year, we need to ensure that we are recruiting women at a faster rate as we seek to change these stats. In both jurisdictions, particularly in WA, we are very mindful of the findings of the respective work reviews as well as the West Australian government review and reviewing our processes and our systems to ensure that we provide a safe workplace, not just physically, but also psychologically for our people from diverse backgrounds, whether that's gender, I don't think I'm that diverse, but apparently I am, but also from diverse ethnic backgrounds. And there are things that we can do practically, and we are doing those things practically as well as continuing to focus on ensuring that where we do have casual sexism, of which I'm often guilty because blokes, they've got a few challenges, don't they? That's a little bit of casual sexism. But nonetheless, ensuring that we don't have casual sexism, which really translates into unconscious bias is really important within our workplace. Of course, the other things which are incredibly important is focusing on our climate change -- mitigating climate change effects. Our products are important for the technologies, which will see the globe be able to address some of these. And ensuring that we embed thinking on our effect on the environment and everything we do is really important. A small instance of that is the fact that all of our CapEx forms now have a requirement for the people who are proposing the CapEx to actually provide specific information with respect to environmental impact and emissions. So you'll note that I didn't really make much of a comment on sales or the market. And once again, Pol is with me today, and we'll discuss this as you ask questions. But this -- the biggest challenge that we have today with respect to the market is really just the speed at which it is growing and ensuring that we preserve our prosperity as we grow with that market. And so it's pretty exciting when we look at our growth plan. We have ahead of us 3 actually pretty big years in terms of capital investment, 3 major projects. So the upgrade that we announced a couple of weeks ago at Mt Weld at about $500 million. That provides us not only with the ability to more than double our throughput also to implement a number of initiatives to improve our resilience with respect to climate change, but also in terms of improving our effect on the environment. So that includes water, improving our water recycling up to sort of 90% recycled, could also include looking at alternative energy solutions to our current solution, which none of us like, which is, of course, our diesel fire power. The second project and some of you had the opportunity to actually see progress here, of course, is our new Rare Earths Processing Facility in Kalgoorlie, which is progressing at pace. We finished the year more than 40% completed on that, and I can tell you that it's significantly ahead as we speak. And every day, a visit to that site, see something new and different in place. And then, of course, the other very exciting thing was after sort of many years of quite diligent work, we had the award for the Heavy Rare Earths plant in the U.S. alongside previous award for construction of the Light Rare Earths plant. We are now well progressed in a phase 2 deliverables of that particular project. And as with Kalgoorlie, we expect project -- we expect progress to now accelerate it. But alongside those major projects, we have a number of complementary projects of smaller size, which are really about building our capability as a business as we go forward. The exploration program at Mt Weld is very exciting. I don't pretend that I get quite as excited as CEOs do, but nonetheless, as I've briefed previously, we have identified an exploration target as a result of our 1 kilometer deep drill hole that we did last year. It is very exciting. We saw continuous mineralization right through to the bottom of that drill hole and that is certainly highly prospective for us to be able to continue to operate the Mt Weld deposit for many years to come. Debottlenecking activities at Mount Weld to continue. And in Malaysia, we remain very committed to our Malaysian facilities. We are increasing. Many of you who have been with us for many years would know that we've had pretty low sustaining CapEx over many of those years. We're now really looking at ensuring that we direct CapEx to ensure asset integrity in the most important areas. And as is indicated in both our release and in our financial report today, we have a number of projects in Kuantan, which will see us be able to pick up throughput growth over the next 2 years as well. So as always, I think it's best if I talk rather less in terms of outlining the situation. You've got a number of documents, including our financial report, the release and also the presentation, which I'm sure that you can go through at your leisure. But really, the best opportunity is for us to take your questions. And so I'm very happy to do that now.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Paul Young from Goldman Sachs.
Paul Young
analystAmanda, hopefully, this question is not too gnarly, but thanks for additional information around the CapEx for '23 and '24. Just trying to figure out what you need to spend on LAMP to get that facility from 7.2 to 10.5. You've given us the Kal CapEx of $600 million or so. You've given us Mt Weld to $500 million clearly, nothing comes cheap at the moment to expand a small concentrator. But just trying to figure out what of the -- of the $1.2 billion you've outlined today in '23, '24 is going into LAMP? And what is the budget to expand LAMP?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveSo in terms of the expansion and the investment in the LAMP facility, there are a few areas in that, and so it's a little bit difficult to just pull out just the single point around uplift in terms of throughput. So the big areas that we're talking about in the LAMP, the first is actually the [ MRIC ] receivable, so that's receiving the material which comes from Kalgoorlie. And as part of that, receiving that mixed rare earth carbonate and, therefore, dissolving it ready to feed into the process. We are putting in a number of enhanced activities there, including things like management of soda ash and receivable and a number of other areas. The actual throughput uplift as it relates to the ability to get material through salt and extraction is a relatively small capital number because we're putting in place a flow sheet enhancement. So we haven't finalized the actual number on that, but it's in the low tens of millions as opposed to hundreds of millions of dollars to do that because we're taking this new approach to a flow sheet and we will be putting in additional capability in our product finishing area, once again in the low tens of millions of dollars to do that by putting in new furnaces for production there. A number of other things that we're doing within the LAMP investment is really more about enhancing, as I said, asset integrity. The plant is now a little older. It's still relatively new plant, but still it's a little older. And also some significant process efficiencies like, for example, continuous precipitation rather than batch precipitation. So that gives you a sense. We will give a more detailed update on the LAMP capability. What we wanted to do in here was to put in some sort of markers for the size of that capital, but in the same way that we provided more detail on Kalgoorlie and that well, we will, at the appropriate time lines, we've completed all of that task, provide more information on the LAMP.
Paul Young
analystYes. Okay. That's really helpful, Amanda. Maybe just further to that, is there a little bit of CapEx in FY '25 to finish off LAMP and also the U.S. refinery to hit the 2025 target? I presume there is.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveThere will be a little, and it's always a bit tricky. There's a capital commitment and then there's where does the cash actually go out. So putting this sort of 600 plus 600, that should certainly, by the end of FY '24, we should be looking at the commitments have all been made. It won't necessarily mean all the cash has gone out for the U.S. because most of that is coming off the U.S. government -- from the U.S. government grants. That will just be a cash flow basis as we will have some cash go out and then it will actually come back to us as we claim that through the grant program.
Paul Young
analystOkay. Okay. A final one for me for now is around, I guess, heavy -- production of heavy Tb Dys, et cetera. First of all, thanks for clarifying the 12,000 tonnes of NdPrs on a product basis, not equivalent. But just at that rate, can you guide us to how much -- what production of heavy use will you have on an annualized basis?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveYes, we can do that. Pol, would you like to address that?
Pol Le Roux
executiveYes. I think we have this here.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveLook at us, we could be in one of those nice sort of photos from a century ago.
Pol Le Roux
executiveSo focusing on -- this is high tech, right, 1 single person can fit in the box. So at the 600 tonnes a month of NdPr, basically -- and again, it depends on the mix of ore we get from that well, but the average content of Dy is around 70 tonnes of Dy a year and 15 tonnes or 20 tonnes of terbium. So this would move up proportionally, it should move to -- when we move to 900 tonnes a month. And assuming we have always the same mineral coming, but of course, here, there might be some development as well.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveSo just on that, one of the things that the exploration program and our continuous resource drilling focus is on is not just mining for grade but mining for elements. And so up until now, we're really mined the grade, and so the heavies that have come with the NdPr have simply come with the NdPr. But as we do more resource drilling, we understand that there are areas within our ore body where the heavies are relatively enriched. And so we will look at our -- we're at present reviewing our mine program, and we will look to be able to move into some of those areas preferentially as we put our production capability in place.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Hayden Bairstow from Macquarie.
Hayden Bairstow
analystJust a couple for me. Just on -- firstly, on the tax for the accounts. I just want to understand how much more tax credits you've got so you can bring back on the balance sheet and sort of give yourself tax shelter going forward? And then just some comments on the NdPr market, maybe from Pol. Just came to understand why the prices have come off as aggressively hefty, particularly in the last few weeks, what you're seeing on that front? Is it just literally these power restrictions in China closing our manufacturing? Or is there something more to it?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveThanks, Hayden. And I would love those questions but I'm not going to answer either of them. I'm going to throw to Gaudenz to talk to you about tax, and then I'll throw it to Pol to talk to you about the market.
Gaudenz Sturzenegger
executiveYes, and a quick point on the taxes. So I think we are still in Malaysia under the pioneer status, so you will not see the taxes coming through in Malaysia. In Australia, I think we did use up the tax loss carry forwards. However, with the commissioning of the Kalgoorlie plant, there's another event happening there, which will probably also take this forward. And yes, I think it's pretty cleaned out on the tax side.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveOkay. I'll pass to Pol.
Pol Le Roux
executiveYes. So in regard to market and I guess the only focus is on price. Just a reminder, NdPr price was RMB 290 in July '20, RMB 550 in July '21. And today, it's RMB 630. So yes, I know that it was RMB 1,000 a few months ago, but RMB 630 a kilogram is equivalent to USD 85 CIF China. It's not that painful. I think what is important to understand is that the demand, and that's what we see, the demand increase and continues to increase substantially. So we expect -- sorry, we are looking at this in calendar years, but the calendar year '22, we expect this to be way a few percent more higher than 20%, so probably 22%, 23% up versus '21, which was 16% up versus '20. 2020 was a bit slow growth, but I think a few businesses grew as much as 3% growth, and before it was 6% to 9%. So we are really in a situation of very strong growth. And the main driver, I think it's very important to understand, the main drivers for this growth, basically very simple. Our first element is wind turbines and I think after years, and I think in the presentation pack, there is a slide on wind turbines. You will see that after talking about wind turbines for many years, in fact, the new installation of wind turbines was rather flat until 2020. 2021 is a step change, so we reached 93 or 95 gigawatts units to extend every year. But the most important is to see the portion of direct drive. And direct drive, as you know, consumes a lot more NdPr or magnets. So it's 550 kilos of magnets per megawatt. So 10 gigawatts consumes basically in direct drive, 3,000 tonnes of NdPr. And we foresee a continuous growth. If you look at GWEC, I think they're very recognized Global Wind and Energy Council. Numbers, just the confirmed projects around the world show continuous growth of minimum 6% to 7% in the next 5 years and a growing portion of direct drive. So this is first drive for the global demand. And every wind turbine maker meet is very eager to secure their motor supply. Second trigger or driver for the growth is automotive. So global economy being a bit uncertain, I think it's reasonable to not plan for growth, any growth in the global automotive market. So let's assume that you would still have 80 million, 85 million cars sold a year worldwide in 5 years' time, and then we will see, hopefully, the world will become easier, but let's be reasonable. When you build internal engine, internal combustion engine car, you're having sudden average of 1.2 kilograms of magnets. When you go for hybrid or plug hybrid, it's 2.5 kilograms of magnets. And when it's battery cars, it's 3 kilograms of magnets. All in all, what the key numbers to keep in mind is that for 10 million cars, if it's an internal combustion engine, it consumes 4,500 tonnes of NdPr oxide. If it's a hybrid of flat hybrid, it's 5,000 tonnes more. So when you replace internal combustion engine with hybrid, plug hybrid, you actually consume 5,000 tonnes more of NdPr oxide. And if you replace that by batteries, EVs, it would be close to 7,000 tonnes oxide more. And that is exactly that what is happening in Europe. This morning, there was an announcement for California to ban internal combustion engines by 2035. I was in France enjoying too hot chemical weather last month. I was amazed to see the number of electric cars today it's ahead of diesel cars, which is something that is very new. So this doesn't change. The demand is very strong. So you have a temporary situation where we saw recently the price decreasing, again, to a level that is not to pay forward. $85 a few years back would be our dream, not even in our dreams. But well, not forgetting that the costs have increased a lot. So everything is relative. But the key question is on supply and the key question was how much production quotas China will release. So it was announced at the end of July or early August. I know that magnet buyers and makers were expecting a 40% increase in quotas. Real suppliers would prefer 20% And at the end of the day, the increase was 25%, which is -- which shows that actually China is concerned about maintaining a certain stability in the market. And that should make us all very comfortable with the price forward. But again, as I always say, the best way to enjoy NdPr price is buy some from us, put this in your garage and you will make a lot of money sometime.
Hayden Bairstow
analystOkay. Great. Just following back on that tax question, Amanda, just on when does that holiday run out? I mean, you've been operating for almost 10 years now in Malaysia.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveYes. So Gaudenz?
Gaudenz Sturzenegger
executiveYes, it's running until '26. That's another 3 years to go.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveAnd I would apologize to all the Americans on the line for Pol thinking that California was in Europe. However, there are some consistencies, I guess, in approach to some of the regulations. I think within your question was also sort of this temporary softness in the price, which certainly is reflecting some kind of difficult situations within that China. Outside of China, and I think it is always incumbent on me to remind investors that we are the only non-Chinese producers separated real risk. Demand remains very strong, and we find that not only, of course, our traditional and highly valued magnet-making customers, particularly in Japan. Demand is very strong, but we are seeing a lot more pull-through as well from end users, both in European and U.S. markets. Once again, the core reason why we are so focused on increasing our capability as fast as possible so that we can continue to grow with the market.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Daniel Morgan from Barrenjoey.
Daniel Morgan
analystSo my first question is, so you're expanding your business, which is great. Just wondering about your customer base in the years to come. What is your latest thoughts on magnet-making facilities being built outside of China? So when you grow as you plan to, does that additional volume -- is it going to go to Japan? Is it going to go to China? Or might we have European or United States magnet-making facilities?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveOnce again, I'll let Pol take that question.
Pol Le Roux
executiveI think as of today, the biggest magnet manufacturing, of course, is Japanese. And I say Japanese because the major magnet-maker has a new base in Vietnam, Shin-Etsu. So they are growing altogether very strong and much more than what we were expecting a few years back. There are many projects around in Europe and U.S. We are following them very closely. And of course, any projects for magnet making anywhere needs to secure supply of NdPr outside China. There is not many options, so it's an easy marketing for us. Our job, I think, is very simple, is to provide the environment for magnet maker to grow or to happen in the U.S. and in Europe and in Asia. So what we aim at is to provide both light, heavies and recycling capability in these areas. And so that is the -- on the supply side, the competitive environment, you know that when you make magnets, it's very important to have next door recycling capability. Otherwise, they are not competitive. And to continue promoting these possibilities and capabilities with the OEMs because at the end of the day, the decision is from the OEMs to actually secure part of their supply or sourcing from a non-fully non-Chinese supply chain. The decision is in their hands. Our job is to provide the environment for this to happen. But I'm pretty sure it will happen, but there is absolutely no confirmed project as far I'm concerned today.
Daniel Morgan
analystSo does that mean that you're targeting to try to sign offtake agreements with -- for your book that is not contracted work? Maybe just remind us on what your order book or offtake agreements are with Japan? And then how does that change as you grow?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveSo as part of our agreement with JARE, we have certain offtake agreements, which see us prioritize supply so long as it is at no commercial disadvantage, which is a really important clause that basically says that we will sell to the Japanese, providing they will pay us more than anybody else will pay us. In terms of the sort of our portfolio of customers, as Pol just been indicating, we have magnet makers and we have magnet buyers. Most of what we sell at present and most is actually to magnet makers. But we do have some contracts with magnet buyers as well, where we will assure the supply of the raw material and they will actually give us the address of their magnet maker deliver to. So as we look at this, the dominant portion of our business goes to magnet makers today, but we have strong demand from magnet buyers. Once again, one of the reasons why we're seeking to increase our throughput as quickly as we can, so we will be able to allocate material into them. When we think about pricing, particularly, do we take pricing strategies that mitigate the fluctuations of sort of the published price. And once again, we've indicated for some years that we look to have a portfolio pricing. So we do have a couple of key contracts, which have poor selling prices, which sometimes that works in our favor, sometimes not. But across the period of the contract, we have found our poor selling prices have had a net benefit to the company. And then there are particular segments where we might look at other options like, for example, fixed price. This is particularly relevant for wind. And as Pol said, this is an increasingly important segment. So a producer of wind turbines will have a project which might have a 2-year life. And it is more important to them as they conclude their negotiations on that to have a guaranteed supply at a set price rather than necessarily how it might correlate to any particular day's published price. So we do have within our order book the majority of our materials sold with some sort of reference to the published price, a portion of our materials sold on floor -- ceiling contracts and a smaller proportion sold on fixed prices. But we're always open to the concept of fixed prices probably but not much more than about 2 years, but coming up with fixed price contracts for that period of time where it is relevant for sort of our customers' business.
Daniel Morgan
analystSwitching to Mt Weld. Sorry, just some feedback. Resource drilling that you're undertaking, can you just outline what is the extent of the drilling campaign? Is there a target date for a new resource reserve? And then how important is the upgrade to the Mt Weld expansion that you've outlined recently, the $500 million to do apatite ore processing. Like how important is that for the future resource reserve at Mt Weld?
Amanda Lacaze
executiveYes. It's a really good question, Daniel. And so we have 2 pieces of drilling work. Of course, we have the normal resource drilling, which is associated with our mine plan on the existing mineral reserve, and so we continue to do that at present as part of the mining campaign. And that's the piece where I was talking about really drilling into some areas. We call it the Mickey Mouse set ears, in particular, but into some areas where we have more relatively where it is relatively enriched with the heavies. Then separate from that is the more fundamental exploration program, which is really about the carbonatite resource and what lies beneath the current life of mine pit floor, and that we expect is at least a 3-year program, and we will provide some further information on that as we move forward. Of course, it is really important for us to understand the reserve in the ore body, and we do expect that as we move through that program, where we will be able to provide a new resource and reserve. So we don't have a target date for disclosure at this time. The up tidal, as Alex Logan, who I think you've met, say, apatite can be our best friend. And it is certainly part of the flow sheet as we move forward. What are the challenges of that apatite? Well, the challenges are sort of the speed at which it will float and ensuring that we improve our recoveries when we have a mixture of the apatite and the monazite ores. And so that has been factored into the flow sheet for the Mt Weld expansion.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Reg Spencer from Canaccord.
Reg Spencer
analystI've got 3 questions, and they're really more top-down market stuff, Amanda. So you probably get a bit of a reprieve here and maybe 1 for Pol or several for Pol. I appreciate your comments around your observations of the NdPr price. I too am trying to connect the dots between anecdotal evidence of strong demand, how that might interact with increases in Chinese production quotas and pricing action. I know it's not a pure market, and we just kind of have to accept it for what it is. But just on those Chinese production quota increases, what do you believe that capacity utilization is now? Because we've seen almost 4 years -- 4 consecutive years of quota production increases. Are we getting towards capacity or is this -- are we kind of witnessing some capacity being exported to Myanmar, for example?
Pol Le Roux
executiveThat's a good question because it used to be, I mean to say 50% of the capacity is idle. But that was years ago. So yes, you're right, step-by-step of 20% -- up to 20%. They are eating this capacity. This being said, Chinese to me, remain on top of everyone in terms of execution of industrial plans. So I would not expect too much at some stage, it would be unable or being short of capacity that can build factories faster than anyone else. What I want to explain a little bit because I always hear that the price mechanism or the price is not a proper market price. Well, I think the market price in Rare Earths is like in many other metals, it's in fact based and fixed by the real spot market, which is probably 15%, 20% of the total market. 80% of the market is referring to published price. So the real spot price is small, and that's the reason why from time to time, we see -- we see price variations that are against the actual supply-demand situation simply because someone bought the spot market availability and drive up this market, so drive the price up even if the demand goes down or vice versa. The other element that was making the price very volatile in the past was the fact that you have 25% to 30% of product that is actually recycled swap, and that was managed by mainly independent companies and is now mostly integrated into the big suppliers in China. So it's a lot less volatile, and that's the reason why we see now prices that are much more stable than what we have seen in the past.
Reg Spencer
analystOkay. Understood. And I guess an associated question to that Pol would be, obviously, NdPr prices based on public reported prices has fallen 30% since the middle of the year. But yet the other key magnet REOs in terbium and dysprosium have fallen by much less. Do you think that's a function of just market size and liquidity relative to NdPr, which is obviously much, much larger. Just trying -- if demand has apparently fallen on market conditions of these based on NdPr prices falling, I would have thought you would have seen a similar impact in DyTb as well.
Pol Le Roux
executiveDy Terbium has a different situation. There is a real shortage of resource. China is very serious in reducing the institution. So today, main sourcing of ionic clay is from Myanmar, and I heard that some supply comes from Laos and other Southeast Asian countries that we know very well. But basically, this resource is limited, and that's a concern because, as you know, the Dy Terbium role in the magnet is to improve the temperature resistance of magnets. My view on this is that you will not change mother nature. And so when the market grows so much and mother nature cannot change and develop more resource, what will happen is restructuring -- kind of restructuring of the magnet market because when you look into detail on the technical capability of magnet makers, you see a lot of differences in their expertise. And so when one would use 3% Dy for given magnet, another one will use only 1%. And so this is making a massive difference in competitiveness, and we'll definitely restructure especially in China, the magnet market, and I think we'll have a lot less players in the magnet industry in China in very few years than what we see today.
Reg Spencer
analystExcellent. Pol, your help is always very much appreciated us -- in understanding this market. Last question is probably 1 for -- back to you, Amanda. The Inflation Reduction Act, there's obviously some pretty relevant components of that and what that might mean for critical minerals markets. What the -- are you able to comment on what that might mean for your business strategy going forward? The development of a domestic North American magnet supply chain, would you look at potential additional separation of finishing capacity in North America? I'm just trying to get a feel for what you think that might mean for Lynas as a business.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveYes. So I always love the way that you guys the minute that we've sort of announced that we're doing 1 thing, you ask us, well, what's coming next as I've put out operating manager, I'm a bit more focused on executing the 1 thing that we've said. So the constructing our Rare Earths Processing Facility in the U.S. is going to keep us fairly busy for the short term. As Pol said before, we are focused on creating an environment which it's attractive for people to invest in magnet making and proximity to raw materials and recycling capability is important for that. I can't provide terribly insightful views on the Inflation Reduction Act, I have to say. But I can say that we are, at present, finalizing here a second go around at the cost of implementing our U.S. facility, and our discussions with the U.S. government are based upon understanding the various forces that play into that. But it looks like Pol wants to say something. So I'm going to let him say something.
Pol Le Roux
executiveJust to clarify, the U.S. project, when you look at the numbers, the light and heavy rate separation that we plan to put in place together with the recycling capability would be able to supply for close to 7,000 tonnes of finished magnets per year. So to make it very simple, that would give U.S. to move from, let's say, 0 tonnes of production of magnets today to around 50% of what Japan is producing. So let's do that first with whoever serious magnet maker willing to get there and OEM committed really to make a change. And then after catching up 50% of Japan, maybe it would be time to look at 100%, and why not 150%, we'll be more than happy if that retired. But let's try to get to 50% first. That's what we put in place is this environment for anyone to put in place 50% of the existing capacity of magnet making in Japan.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Michael Evans from Acova Capital.
Michael Evans
analystI just want to revisit the capital questions, please, Amanda and team. Thanks for the guidance on the $600 million this year, $600 million next year. Maybe to start with a simple one. On that -- not Mt Weld, Kalgoorlie, it's about 40% complete. Should we assume about 40% of the cash has gone out the door or higher or lower? And on the PDF in Malaysia, can you give us an indication of how much has already been spent on that up to June 30? And I suppose the third part of the question is on that 600 plus 600, are you assuming that you'll continue to be able to crack and leach in Malaysia beyond July next year? And for whatever reason, if not, how does that impact that CapEx? And then maybe the fourth part of the question is on the product finishing and separation in Malaysia. You've got -- I think at the beginning of last year, you indicated about USD 60 million for, I think it was 1,250 of NdPr production at the LRE plant in Texas. Is that a good capital intensity to apply further to apply to the product finishing and the separation in Malaysia? They are my questions.
Amanda Lacaze
executiveOkay. It's nice to hear from you in here, Michael. So I will let Gaudenz deal with the first 2 parts of the question. I'll deal with the third which now -- what was the one is the CNL in Malaysia continuing, we make no assumptions. But we have been steadfast in our view that the various reviews of our operations in Malaysia have found that our operations are intrinsically low risk and that we are compliant with the regulations. The Pakatan Harapan government's Executive Review Committee in 2018 recommended that we should implement a PDF for the WLP residue, the ion phosphate residue, and we have done that. So once again, we have complied with the guidance and the recommendations from the scientists who were involved in doing that review. So we maintain the position that this is -- the facility in Malaysia operating as a full facility is good for us, and it is also good for Malaysia and particularly for our Malaysian employees and communities and so we continue to advocate on their behalf. But we do not make any assumptions with respect to what the political or policy position will be. Gaudenz can deal with the first 2 parts of the question. And then just on the final 1 in terms of capital intensity, the task of increasing throughput in Malaysia, of course, is a much simpler task than the greenfield operation that we're talking about in the U.S., a brownfield expansion, even if it does require us to put in U.S.A. new buildings like we are doing for the mixed Rare Earth carbonate receivable is still a much lower cost than a greenfield project of the sort that we have in the U.S. So no -- the simple answer is no. The capital intensity is much higher for the U.S. than it will be in Malaysia. But over to you, Gaudenz, to answer the first 2 questions on capital spend at Kalgoorlie.
Gaudenz Sturzenegger
executiveYes, I think the answer over the Kalgoorlie one is pretty straightforward. Cash follows the activity. So it's slightly below the cash spend, slightly below the 40%, but not too much. And on the PDF, I think we are already slightly above 50% on that one. As you recall, there were kind of milestones or there are milestones in place. And -- but obviously, still need to follow is the construction mining costs, which are flowing through and also the removal of the -- yes, moving the material from the plant side to the PDF. And that obviously can only happen when we have at least the first cell finished. But overall, slightly above 50% has been incurred. Well, if you look at it in the accounts, it's kind of an operating cost, really the rehab, which has been realized.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions].
Amanda Lacaze
executiveOkay. Well, I see that we're now at 11:03. So if we have no more questions in the queue, we'll wrap up now. Once again, with a reminder that we've had an excellent year, and we continue to look forward to a very prosperous future as we execute our ambitious capital program and as the market continues to grow. So thank you all. I'm sure that we're going to see many of you in person over the next week, and I look forward to doing so. Thanks all.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Lynas Rare Earths Limited transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Lynas Rare Earths Limited earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.