Magna International Inc. (MG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 9, 2022

Toronto Stock Exchange CA Consumer Discretionary Automobile Components conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#1

Okay. Once again, I'm Ryan Brinkman, the U.S. automotive equity research analyst here at JPMorgan. Pleased to get going with our next presentation, which is from Magna International. And we have with us here, Patrick McCann, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; as well as at the end, Eric Wilds, Executive Vice President and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer; and in the middle, Louis Tonelli, Vice President of Investor Relations. So Patrick, Louis, Eric, thanks so much for being here. We really appreciate it.

Patrick McCann

executive
#2

Thank you.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#3

Did you have any opening remarks? Or can I launch right into Q&A?

Patrick McCann

executive
#4

Fire away. Fire away.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#5

That's what I like.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#6

Okay. So I wanted to get your -- start with a couple of kind of broad industry questions because you are, what, like the third or fourth largest auto parts player in the world, right? $40 billion of prepandemic revenue, make everything for everybody, and every country, including cars themselves, not everything. But I wanted to get your thoughts on normalized demand in the United States, which drives the lion's share of the market for North America light vehicle production. Prior to the pandemic, we were averaging kind of 17 million SAAR for many years. We're at 13.7 million currently, with the most often suggested reason being the clear constraints on supply, which is clearly a factor. But I was wondering if you thought it might potentially be more complicated than that, whether demand in terms of unit volumes is likely to truly come back to prepandemic levels, given the now much higher price of vehicles sold, like 46,000 versus kind of 35,000 previously. And if it does come back, kind of over what time frame? Or if we are in some sort of new period now maybe marked by longer-term lower volume and higher price. How do you think the supplier industry or maybe Magna in particular is positioned for that environment?

Patrick McCann

executive
#7

I can jump in. And Louis, please add. When we think about what's happening right now -- and hopefully, everybody can hear me, if I go closer. When I -- when we think about what's happening in the industry, it's really supply constraint. That's really what we're struggling with. It's not necessarily the demand side. That's reflected in the low inventories. We're running 25 days versus 75 previously. So if you look back 12 months, I think, Ryan, it was really a drive by constraints. Looking forward, it's starting to stabilize, but probably another 6 months plus of stabilization to happen. So I think we're constrained in that period of time. Macroeconomically, I would say, there is a lot of inflation in the system. There's rising interest rates. So there's risk to downward trajectory on volumes. That being said, what we need is stability from the Magna point of view. So you have a tailwind on the low inventory base. They're going to have to replenish. They do have to sell vehicles. As you said earlier, they do have a nice price point where they're at. And we're not seeing really the stuffing of the pipeline that we would have seen in previous downturns.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#8

I think it's such a competitive industry, and the OEMs are going to want to make sure that they have enough inventory in the pipeline to make sure that they can satisfy demand and not lose share. So I think that's going to lead to an increase in overall inventory levels and production over time. I think that's just inevitable that's going to happen. And if it doesn't happen, if you end up seeing, let's say, lower -- higher price and lower volume, that affects the price equation as well, right? Higher volumes means lower price for us. So that's going to change the profitability mix for us.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#9

Great. I wanted to get your latest thoughts, too, on the pace and progress of customer discussions to recover a lot of the premium costs that you've incurred over the past year, including diesel, freight, logistics, natural gas, electricity, right, and the likely impact to Magna's margin. And maybe you can address it in a couple of different ways. First of all, with regard to the current contracts, which didn't anticipate these premium costs, which I think you're expecting to collect on in the back half of this year. But also secondly, what can you tell us maybe about like the new contracts that have been signed over the past year or are going to be signed amidst this new higher-cost environment? Are you potentially any better protected with regard to newer contracts? Should noncommodity supply chain costs surprise higher again in the future?

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#10

So I'll take it at the start. And the benefit of Magna is, since we have so many different commodities in all of our different groups, I think we're impacted by every form of inflation there is right now, right? So we have lots of experience in balancing it all. But if you look at where we are, we started to get recoveries already, right, in -- for this year and are expecting more like the negotiations. And I think the continuity of the conversations continues throughout the whole year. In the back half, we expect to have more settlements than we have now. Now I think that's already reflected in a lot of our guidance for 2022. But the topics of whether it be labor or commodities or, as you mentioned, the freight, right, they are different for us. There's different forms of negotiations and settlement. Some of them are short term, how do we impact 2022, some of them speak to what you were talking about, what's '23, '24, how do we derisk our portfolio going forward? So we have some short term and long term. Some of it -- a lot of it's more on the timing of when those impacts hit. But for us, I think the one thing, if you look at the auto industry, previously, a lot of these items weren't on the table for discussion, but based on the significance of the industry impact, a lot of the -- these conversations are all now part of the commercial discussions that we have, right? When it's tied to efficiency, when it's tied to pricing., And if you look at what we think is long term, like maybe labor is a little stickier and it's going to last longer, right? Those would be things that would be priced into future contracts, future quotes. So it kind of normalizes itself over time. But right now, we've been making -- we've taken some strong positions, but have been making progress with our customers and addressing it right in the different regions of the world.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#11

Okay. Great. Maybe turning to the product portfolio. Could you perhaps remind us of some of the fastest-growing areas within your business, which I imagine are those that are most aligned with the industry mega trends. For example, you've called out potential like 50% compound annual growth in electronic drive units coming out of the LG venture, 30% CAGR, I think, for battery enclosures in coming years with the product already on the Lightning, the Hummer, which is outside the building, some similar vehicles. Are there any other product categories you might like to highlight maybe on electrification or the ADAS side or anything else? And just what are the fastest-growing areas of Magna would you say or the product or technologies that you're most excited about?

Patrick McCann

executive
#12

Again, I'll start, and I'm excited about everything, Ryan, right? So if you think about Magna, we do so much, and it's exciting. So when you look at our portfolio, we have 75%, 80% is agnostic, whether it goes on to an EV or if it's mega trend related or not. But when we focus on our mega trend piece, there is the powertrain. So when we talk about powertrain, we're talking about eDrives, what's propelling the vehicle. So is it -- how we get power to the wheels? And that growth is going from $300 million up to $4.5 billion plus when you look on a managed basis, including the joint ventures. The second big category would be the battery enclosures. So the Hummer outside you're referring to, we're actually building that battery train, and that's the one that would have been at the Investor Day. And it's a very complicated, highly engineered product that's growing from virtually 0 to $1.5 billion in a couple of years. So it's a fantastic product. And if you want to go crawl under the car, so it's a good opportunity to do it. And I think the third category is ADAS. When you think about our mega trends where we see growth above market. And we speak about ADAS, we're focused on L2, L2+ in that category. And it's the sensor suite that we're able to stitch together and pull it all. And really, what's really driving a lot of the ADAS, that's a newer product, is in the DMS side. So driver monitoring and how do you integrate -- the power of Magna is having a mirror component and you have an electronics piece and how do you marry them together to provide a product to the customer, being either the OEM or the end consumer that they want. And it's nice and sleek and clean. And it's a good business for us, and it's a good business for the OEMs and solutions.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#13

And there's other areas. I mean, if you think about the Investor Day, and we talked about the growing -- the mega trend areas, the aligned areas -- that aligned areas, there's areas there that we see growing faster than the market as well. I think in the mirror side, mechatronics, lighting, seating and those are all the areas that we believe we can grow faster than the market going forward. So we're excited about the mega trend areas, but also excited about the rest of our business.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#14

Yes. I think the lighting on the interior with the reconfigurable lighting, that's where I first started noticing that this is a growth area, but maybe we'll see in the future more of what I saw at your Investor Day, it was kind of this exterior lighting that kind of like blends into the vehicle, right? That seems like a potential new trend. We might see more of that in the future?

Patrick McCann

executive
#15

Yes, I think so as well. I think it's a differentiator. So if you're an OEM, you really want to differentiate your product. And back to the Hummer downstairs, if you look at the Hummer, it has the Hummer logos built right in, and it's a lighting option. And I think they really -- do that -- I don't think we do the Hummer, right, Louis? But it's a feature you're trying to build in that they're differentiating their product from one to the other. And it's -- I think lighting, in particular, has a lot of growth opportunities in cabin, outside cabin to your point, just differentiators and how does it blend right into the actual Class A services.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#16

Okay. So we talked about the parts of the business that are like the most aligned with the secular trends, the battery enclosures, the EDUs and those grow superfast. And we talked about some other areas that grow faster like lighting, et cetera. And then you talked about -- there's a lot that's agnostic. When you add it all up, and when you take the growth rates, your weighted average times, your exposure to these different areas, and then maybe you layer in, too, some minority of the business that could be negatively impacted, like gas tanks, for example. When you add it all up, what do you think it equals when it comes to your ability to outgrow the overall trend in light-vehicle production or weighted for the geographies that you're also trading?

Louis Tonelli

executive
#17

So we haven't talked about growth of our market explicitly beyond our outlook period. But just based on our plans, we did plans to do the 2027, '28 years that we have in our Investor Day. Based on that, we do expect to be able to grow faster than our overall market. So we're over that plan period. So we're excited about our ability to -- even with the things that are agnostic or things that are shrinking, that we're going to -- overall Magna should grow faster than the market.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#18

Yes. Well, you've consistently grown faster than market and faster than the market relative to what the multiple sort of implies, right? So it will be interesting to the extent to which you can continue to do that. Maybe just delving in one of the faster-growing areas that we touched on, which is this e-Powertrain venture in Korea. When you first announced that in December 2020, it was an incredible market reaction. And in the year or so, it didn't close to, what, like last July, but that's been a year now, right? So in that first year, has this business been up and running? Is there anything you can point to in terms of like additional business wins, for example? What would you say that each partner has brought to the table? Is it 1 plus 1 equals more than 2? I know LG had some solid technology, right? Did they also benefit you from their customer relationships? I don't know -- I'm just assuming they might have been strong with Hyundai, Kia or other customers? And then how should we think about to profitability for the venture tracking? Is it that it's growing so quickly it provides all this operating leverage and so the profitability improves quickly? Or are you reinvesting that technology to prepare for significant future growth? How do you think about all that?

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#19

So maybe I'll start. If you look at LG and the Magna partnership, you're right, LG has some great technology. And you couple that with what we bring from Magna, from the technology that we have as well as the manufacturing expertise, it's -- LG has been a great partner, right? And once we started in July, now it's a JV that we don't consolidate, so some of the numbers we don't necessarily share directly. But the -- if you look at and you say, well, what have we done in the last year, right now, right, we kicked off the plant. We broke ground already in Mexico in the Ramos area, where we're going to be making a plant for power motors and inverters and helping to bring the -- one of the designated customers is General Motors, but it's been really positive. The 2 of us in such a short time coming together have already defined a location in Mexico, and we already have that plant kicked off, which shows that the market growth and the volumes that we need to generate is already off to a great start. It's a nice complement to when you talk about what do we get excited about eDrives and we know the change in BEVs, but the LG partnership gives us jointly the ability to address components within the eDrive system so as customers are figuring out, do they do systems, do they do components or do they do none of it, it allows us to kind of play in the field of everything that we need to do. And if you look at the growth, I think when we announced the JV, we had identified a 50% CAGR from -- for the next few years, and we've held to that 50% CAGR for the -- our outlook period through '24. So it's been a really positive experience so far and that the team has been great to work with.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#20

In terms of profitability -- I hate to be the bad guy but we don't control the joint venture, we can't really talk about profitability. But it is an investment mode. We are certainly investing for future programs. So it's going to take some time before it turns around. But we believe, once the business ramps, it should be a meaningful contributor to our equity income.

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#21

I just want to add to -- I forgot to answer your question on customers. I think there's only 2 customers that have been publicly discussed, General Motors and Jaguar. But knowing their customer base complements ours very nicely, right, I mean it's core customers that we work with. They've worked with some of them already, and then we're hoping to help them expand even into others that they're currently not -- the JV isn't currently working with. So it really looks like a kind of a good marriage to take that business forward.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#22

Great. And I'd like to ask next some questions around your complete vehicle assembly business, which obviously makes Magna very unique, right, amongst other auto part suppliers that you actually make automobiles yourself. Louis knows sell side is very famous for our multipart questions. I'll take it one at a time. First of all, maybe just give us an update on some of the recent or pending launches that you've got in the pipeline, for example, the Fisker Ocean in Europe or anything else you might like to call out?

Patrick McCann

executive
#23

Yes. So our operation, I'm not sure if you've been there, Ryan, but it's in Austria. So it's in Graz, Austria, and it's a really -- it's an excellent facility where there's a bunch of flexibility. So right now, we've launched and been running the G-Class, the Mercedes G Wagon for years, I think since 1974. That's incredible. And we also run -- we have sole production of the Jaguar I-PACE and E-PACE, which is an interesting flexibility where you're running down an ICE line and an EV line on the exact same line going through the same paint line. You then have the BMW Z4 and split production on the BMW i series. And then finally, we have the Toyota Supra. So those are products that we've been running, producing for 3 years. To your point earlier, the big launch coming is Fisker. And that's our #1 priority in the facility right now. We need to execute that launch. And that's expected to launch towards the end of this year. It would be my expectation, and then it's going to ramp over time. I think we're there. It's a lot of heavy lifting to get there. Product launches are never easy. But I think that's a success story where we were able to work with a new entrant and bring speed to market. They want an asset-light model. We came in with engineering solutions, system solutions, and we're able to launch the product very, very quickly.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#24

In China, we have a facility in -- with the joint venture partner, BJEV, and we're producing the ArcFox Alpha S and T, and we've got a couple more vehicles that are going to be produced in that.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#25

Yes, a follow-up there. What has been the early experience in China, not just on -- with BJEV, but I think also you reserve the right to use that capacity for other companies. I think there's seen to be a pipeline of companies in China that might want to launch yet don't have factories or whatnot. Are you in discussions with others? Have you actually signed agreements with others? What percentage of the facility, that capacity is already allocated for -- with the programs that you have versus what remains that you could still bid for and produce?

Patrick McCann

executive
#26

I can start at first. So right now, we're producing 2 vehicles, as Louis said, so it's the Alpha S and Alpha T and there is plans to launch 2 more vehicles on the same ArcFox brand. As far as discussions with other customers...

Louis Tonelli

executive
#27

Yes. At this point, we've announced nothing, right? But that capacity still remains, and we're in the process of -- I mean, there's -- it's the whole contract manufacturing business. I think it has multiple irons in the fire that we're kind of working around. And I think once we get a little more -- this is my view -- a little bit more stability in our marketplace, I think you'll start to see some of those decisions start to come to fruition.

Patrick McCann

executive
#28

Okay. The only thing I would add, Ryan, when you mentioned the word facility, we bring much more than a facility. Like anybody can put in a paint line, anybody can put in a body shop, fresh shop and assembly hall. It's how do you manufacture, design, engineer all the vehicle engineering know-how across the systems, bring it all together and launch it quickly. That's the real trick when you launch these facilities -- these programs rather.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#29

Okay. So we discussed Europe. We discussed China. Any other geographies that we're missing? What about North America? Actually, I can't ask this question because I saw that Don Walker had made some comments on the Canadian press a few years ago. Maybe I haven't heard as much sense then, but obviously, Fisker, again, I think is working with maybe Foxconn. Is it that Lordstown facility? You've got a couple of other start-up EV companies. I think manufacturing has proven difficult. I mean even Tesla, talk about manufacturing hell, right? And they've got a lot more volume than some of these start-ups. Just curious if you see this as a business model that could be applicable for North America? Or maybe not even for start-ups, I mean Mercedes knows how to build vehicles. And yet for some reason, it's more economical for them to have you build their more niche products. So what do you think?

Patrick McCann

executive
#30

That was a lot of questions in that one, but the answer might be yes. We'll definitely bring that expertise from Europe and/or China into North America. It's really going to be based on a business plan, right? So you have to look at, number one, is it a good product? Is it something that's going to be sustainable? Is it a good product? Is it good company, whether it's a new entrant or a traditional OEM? But you have to have a product that sells and it's strong and what's the business case that's going to support that investment. It's a significant investment. And what's the cost-sharing model when you break it down?

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#31

Graz was an already existing facility, right? They were making commercial vehicles or something. And China was a greenfield. Does it matter? I mean I think we have some factories right now in North America that haven't been running in a few years, right?

Patrick McCann

executive
#32

I think you're always better when you build from scratch. So it's just you get your flows. So if you think about how Steyr, like I said earlier, your manufacturing engineering, you can build it into your process, and you have efficiency jump gains right out of the gate. But would we look at a brownfield, absolutely. But it's the short-term speed to market offset with your manufacturing efficiencies on a long-term basis.

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#33

And I think that would go with the customers we're talking to, right? Different customers are going to have different needs. And if it's brownfield and a timing or a location works better, I think that's an option. If it's a greenfield then they got the time and the product right, the networks, too. But those are all -- I think, all kind of levers we have to pull because I think we do bring a level of flexibility. And then to your point, too, if you look at the, let's call it, new entrants, the other thing, the same thing we're doing in Graz is we're able to bring in other Magna products to help support a faster-to-market entry, right? Just because we're managing a bigger piece of the bill of material, which allows us to take some critical systems, integrate them into the vehicle while we're trying to manage -- to help manage the rest of the supply base.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#34

Okay. Great. Maybe sticking with complete vehicle assembly, but thinking a bit more holistically. Can you talk about the impact, if any, of the assembly business on other parts of Magna? For example, aside from the obvious assembly fee, does -- are there other benefits like do you have more content per vehicle for other parts on Magna-built vehicles than a typical vehicle? And then maybe similarly, in addition to assembling vehicles for automakers, I believe you also provide some key engineering services, right, perhaps especially for the start-ups. Does that open the door to you from a complete vehicle assembly or a content per vehicle perspective?

Patrick McCann

executive
#35

Yes. I'll start. Eric, you can jump in as well. And I think Eric kind of touched on this on the BOM piece of it. But our Steyr business, the way we run our business is as Steyr looks at that product, whatever -- whether it's an engineering piece or whether it's the assembly and it's an appropriate return business. So the margins appear low when you look at the numbers, but it's a low-capital-type business. And so what you're doing is driving a returns-based business. And that would be the same on the engineering. It's not much capital, but what we're really trying to do is open the door. And we have line of sight in -- whether it's traditional or new entrances line of sight earlier in the production program design. And what we're able to do, given all our know-how of how the -- whether it's a chassis module or an ADAS system, powertrain, how do they all talk to one another. And that's what Steyr brings us. And what the end result is, what Eric was talking about earlier, we do have higher content on Magna-built or assembled vehicles than we would on our average content more broadly.

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#36

Can I add to that, too? The other piece -- Patrick, can you lean back a little bit -- but the other piece I wanted to say is even if Magna doesn't build the contract vehicle, it doesn't build the vehicle, the nice thing that the Steyr piece does is some early exposure to some of these new customers and some of these new opportunities, that allows even our groups to even get some early exposure as well. So even if we don't build the vehicle, there's some different content opportunities that we'd be able to see because there's some earlier engagement, right, by the -- our engineering team...

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#37

Great. I wanted to ask on the trend in automakers ordering more -- from suppliers ordering more like complete systems as opposed to individual components. What are you seeing there? Because I think you produce a multitude of components. Does that put you in a better position because you have such a diversified product? Does that put you in a better position to bid for the system-level work? And then somewhat like conversely, when contracted to provide a system, no matter where the components come from, does that put you in a better position to select Magna, as you're a component supplier? I mean, obviously, everything is arms-linked. But just curious, rather than integrating another supplier's component into your system, which I know you're willing to do, if that's what the automaker prefers, but really, I'm just trying to get a sense sort of similar to the last question, the degree to which you might benefit from the -- what you call the Magna ecosystem right, does it confer benefits to the company as a result of essential -- your almost conglomerate-type status, right?

Eric Jon Wilds

executive
#38

I think the short answer is yes. If you look -- the one thing that we're able to do is because of the different product groups we have, the different commodities, we can pull things together as far as how they interact, how they interface, look for synergies in products and broader systems. And the system sourcing versus component sourcing, there's not one necessarily approach that is taken by all OEMs. But we do see a transition to -- as they're working on the things that they think are critical to their business, how do they source the other elements and some of that is going to system sourcing and the combination of products together. And some great examples you mentioned, the liftgate where we have the exterior liftgate, and we're integrating lighting into that back panel. We look at the eDrive system, it is a powertrain system, but if we want to do the -- with LG, the motor or the inverter separately. I think even if you look at a driver monitoring system, right, we came out with some recent awards on the rearview mirror that has -- we have a Mirrors group. You integrate the camera from our Electronics group. And then we have some software that does the driver monitoring. That combination, all those system integration pieces are examples of kind of success where we're able to -- we understand how to pull it together from a vehicle perspective. And then you layer on that the whole contract manufacturing piece, depending on how large a system, we do see like electrical architectures and the software impact on cars of the future having a pretty significant impact on how everything interacts. And what's nice is we have to come in with that understanding to either help, where asked, if an OEM so chooses or even makes certain offerings.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#39

That's really the power of Magna, right? It's the ability to design, engineer a complete vehicle -- manufacture the complete vehicle and the understanding of the complete systems. It makes us a better system supplier. It makes us able to do more in the systems, and it makes us a better complete vehicle supplier. And that's really what -- one of the magics of Magna.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#40

Let me ask a question about portfolio management, not the kind of portfolio management they do, the kind of portfolio management you do. And I thought, Pat, you touched on a couple of interesting things where you talked about like the margin of the engineering business doesn't need to be as high because there's not as much capital involved. And Louis is always trying to help investors better appreciate how that applies to the seating business, right? And I remember another company -- actually, it was TRW back in the day, they had their structures business. It was just metal structures. And Wall Street is like "Can you sell that? Is this your lowest-margin business?" Like I remember the CFO is just like, "Why should I sell that? It is my lowest margin." But you know what the cash-on-cash returns around it, they're really the best in the business. So maybe you can just talk about -- just to make some Wall Street analysts happy and sell some lower-margin business. Talk about -- because you did take the swing at the EMEA, of course, which would have clearly improved the revenue growth profile. What are you -- what underpins, at the very end of the day, your portfolio optimization strategies? At the end of the day, is it all just kind of return on capital, you're sort of economic animals? Or is there an odd window dressing from a margin or revenue growth perspective? I mean I see you don't guide the growth over market. Maybe that's because there's some really attractive lower-growth business out there that you might want to acquire. I don't -- what do you think?

Patrick McCann

executive
#41

I think it's a combination of all those, and please jump in -- you're right. We are to a certain extent economic animals. So what are we -- we view it as an investment. We're -- if I was running my own business, I was going to put money into the business, what am I going to return on that investment. I think the complication becomes, do I want to do that in ICE business that's deteriorating? Or do I want to take that capital investment and redirect it towards a growing business? So if you think about our messaging of black is deteriorating business, agnostic business and then the green. So our view is, up in this green, we can get similar returns to down at the bottom. We would rather redirect that capital up into the growing business so you're getting appropriate returns, plus you have the growth opportunities that you're going to outgrow market because of the nature of the product is growing addressable market just generally. The other thing you have to consider is cash flow. And if you -- if the TRW example is perfect, we have businesses that are lower margin, but they generate significant cash flow. And that cash flow helps us reinvest and grow in the future for the business. That's -- when you put it all together, that's really what we're trying to accomplish when you're at the Magna top level. We're almost a bank where we're redirecting capital between our investments.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#42

Great. Thanks. Just pause to see if there's any questions out there in the audience. I see there are 2. Do we have a microphone?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#43

[indiscernible]

Patrick McCann

executive
#44

So on the first -- so the way our pricing works on the contract manufacturing is, generally, what happens is there's a whole BOM, like a bill of materials, that goes together with the vehicle. And so if you just picked 1 vehicle, JLR, doesn't really matter. That vehicle is we would have all the BOM costs coming through our sale price, so our revenues would include the BOM. And then what we have is an assembly fee that sits on top of it. And that's where our risk sits is what's our ability to be efficient in assembly. So the BOM is the risk of the OEM. The assembly fee and our execution is our piece of it. As far as the content would go, I think this touches on what Eric was referring to earlier is because we do have great visibility into that bill of materials, we are able to source more on average content from other Magna divisions into that BOM itself.

Louis Tonelli

executive
#45

We have to be competitive. Obviously, the customer is not going to let us have it just because we want to have it. We have to be competitive. But just because we get an early look and understand where the vehicle is going, we can come in there and competitively quote. And the proof is in the pudding. Typically, the programs that we have at Magna Steyr, with the one exception of the programs we have currently, is the BMW 5 Series because it's split production and that sourcing has already happened, but all the other vehicles that we have were well above Magna average content in Europe on those programs.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#46

There's another question as well.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#47

[indiscernible]

Patrick McCann

executive
#48

Yes. I can start with the broad brush. So you're right. So when we think about inflation, maybe in Magna, our whole company, is I would break it down into a sticky inflation or a sticky cost increase versus a more commodity where it's going to bounce up and down. And if you break down our split, about 20% of it sits in the sticky inflation, which would be more of the labor piece of it. And when you look at that type of situation, you're looking at how do we engineer cost out of the system to save that input costs, automation, robotics. The other piece is how do we turn it over. There's a lot of opportunities where Eric will be in with the customer with an ability to touch it, whether they're making engineering change notices or other product changes. To your point, on the other piece of it, if it's commodity, it's up and down. But I think the one thing people have to appreciate with Magna is a large majority of our commodity buy is on customer programs, so we don't take risk broadly on steel. So 75% of our steel is customer orders it and delivers it to our dock, and we would stamp it or process it. And on aluminum, it's probably that range, maybe a little bit higher. And then on the resin side, it's more in the 20% range. So you start peeling it apart, and that's how we get with the -- our inflationary headwinds. Part of it is what we're doing is what's industry issues versus Magna issues. And in the industry issues, we come in and we have to look at an industry-wide solution. So if you think about energy in Europe, for example, the customers have to deal with that. It's not a -- it's an industry solution that has to be dealt with because there's just -- you just need one supplier out there that doesn't deliver and you can't build a car. So I think the OEMs are more open to those discussions to have a broad-based solution.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#49

[indiscernible]

Patrick McCann

executive
#50

I would -- the way I would frame it is we had an expectation for, let's just call it, inflationary pressures at the beginning of the year, and we would have guided that in our '22-'24 guidance. The one change that has happened in that interim was in April or February rather when the invasion happened into the Ukraine. So what ended up happening was we had a significant bump in inflationary pressures, which were the majority, even almost substantially related to energy. Since April, we've seen those costs stabilize, so we haven't really seen cost creep, but we're starting to see some commodities come off.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#51

Just got a minute left. I thought to ask, one of your peers reported toward the end of the supplier earnings season, talked about the potential for significant, not sequential softening, but less recovery in Europe in the back half, talked about a lot of risks, natural gas rationing or whatnot and lack of semiconductors. I know you guys got your ear to the ground. You have huge operations in Europe. Hundred factories, not -- maybe not that big. You've got 350 around the world, so it's not hard to imagine. But are you seeing anything? What's the latest? Even the time since you've reported is not long, but is there some concern that you have there that could be substantially worse in IHS, for example?

Patrick McCann

executive
#52

I'm trying to wait for the clock so I don't have to answer -- but no, when I look at it is, I think they have their view. We have our view. And we have a very thorough process of how we come up with our volume expectations for the industry. And then from there, we work down into our actual revenues. We were comfortable with it last week. We still continue to be comfortable with it. The second part of your question, are we concerned if there's energy rationing? Absolutely, we're concerned about that, but that's not something you can forecast or include in your volume projections.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#53

Okay. Great. Thanks so much, Eric and Pat and Louis. We really appreciate it. Thank you, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Magna International Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Magna International Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.