McKesson Corporation (MCK) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
November 18, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Stephen Baxter
analystHi. This is Steve Baxter, the health care technology and distribution analyst here at Wolfe Research. We're grateful to be joined today by Britt Vitalone, the CFO of McKesson, for our second annual Wolfe Research Healthcare Conference. Britt, thanks again for the time. I hope you're doing well.
Britt Vitalone
executiveThank you. Appreciate it, and hope you're doing well also.
Stephen Baxter
analystYes. So Britt has agreed to go straight into the question-and-answer portion, which is great for us. There's obviously a ton going on that we can talk about. So just as a reminder, for those of you on the line, there's a box available for you to write in questions. Only I can see these questions. And if you submit a question, I will do my best to address it as we move through the call. All right. So let's get started. So obviously, it's been a very busy 48 hours in the space. There's been some really big news yesterday with Amazon rolling out its pharmacy and Prime offering, something that seemed pretty likely for a couple of years now following the acquisition of PillPack. So let's start there. They aren't a customer of yours. So I guess to the extent that they're successful, it seems like potentially, it could come at the expense of some of your customers. Curious, it's early, but to the extent you have any early thoughts you'd like to share there. And then just broadly, how do you think about the positioning in McKesson, if we were eventually to see material shift from retail pharmacies and mail order?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes, great question. And again, appreciate being here. I would agree with one of the things that you just said that when Amazon acquired PillPack back in 2018, I think everybody is anticipating that there would be additional actions at some point in time. So this is not a surprise. I think a lot of people, particularly retailers, independents have been anticipating something along this line. We're still learning what their full intentions are going to be, how far they're going to go with this next step in their journey. So it's difficult to predict at this time exactly what the impacts might be. I would say that retailers and independents, in particular, are prepared for this. They've been continuing to evolve and innovate and build their businesses in anticipation of something like this, whether it be Amazon or anyone else. And I'd say nearly all community pharmacies do offer some form of home delivery or scheduled pickup through an app. Compliance packaging is something that you see being offered by many independents. And independents have continued to evolve with automation capabilities and other services such as medication synchronization and patient adherence programs. So I think independents have continued to invest in their offerings, continued to invest in automation. And I think that they're fairly well positioned to manage additional competition. They're really not very commoditized. I think patients choose independents for very specific reasons, the partnership and the relationship that they have with their pharmacists. So I think from that perspective, retail has been preparing for this. From a McKesson perspective, we'll continue to support our customers as we can. And I would also just point out that we have been very clear about our strategies around oncology and biopharma commercial services. And what -- this move by Amazon doesn't have any direct impact on those at all. We're still -- I'm very excited about the opportunities that we have in both of those areas. So more to come, I'm sure, but just another step that was not really a big surprise.
Stephen Baxter
analystYes. Fair enough. Definitely early days here, and I'm sure we're going to be keeping track of this quite closely. I guess just one other question as far as what Amazon has announced. It does seem like another component of it was around the Prime offering, which looks and feels a lot like what GoodRX has already somewhat popularized. If at all, how did these type of cash pay programs impact your business?
Britt Vitalone
executiveI would say that it's -- in the near term, the impact is not very material. We'll see how these things develop. And cash pay is not new. Discount cards are not novel. So I don't see anything really new or unique here. And for that reason, at this point in time, until we learn more about what they might do, I just don't see a material impact.
Stephen Baxter
analystOkay. So let's talk a little bit about vaccines. The company is obviously going to be serving in a critical role as a central distributor for most COVID-19 vaccines. Can you talk a little bit about what's required operationally to make this vaccine distribution effort possible? How much is already completed? How much sort of remains to do?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. Sure. Look, we're very excited about this. This builds upon a contract that we already have existing with the CDC. And so we're really honored to be able to do -- to perform a service like this in a very similar way that we did H1N1. We're working very closely with CDC and certainly the HHS as we work on kitting and storage programs. It's a top priority for our company. Obviously, we have a very large, dedicated team that's working very closely with the Operation Warp Speed team. There's a lot of really good coordination there. And we've been working and very focused on building the infrastructure and scaling the infrastructure needed in order to pull this off. And we think that we're well prepared to do that. So it's -- operationally, it's a similar approach that you saw with H1N1 in terms of building new and scaling existing infrastructure to handle the surge and the volume and the capacity. We're -- certainly been working hard on that. I feel like we're very well prepared to do that. We've been working very hard on the kitting and storage program. A lot of that production of those kits is already well underway. And certainly, we're coordinating closely on when a vaccine distribution will begin, taking our direction from the administration on what vaccine is going to be delivered to what location, and we're prepared to handle the logistics on that. So more to come, obviously, as the program around vaccines continues to evolve.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. And maybe could you touch on how these investments have impacted the P&L during the first half of the year? I know that you are being reimbursed by the federal government for some of this. Like has there been a net impact to your P&L? Just kind of how has that been impacting the financials thus far?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. We -- it didn't have an impact through our second quarter. Obviously, we're -- as you mentioned, there is a reimbursement set aside for the vaccine program in terms of reimbursing our new and scaled existing infrastructure. So from that perspective, as we go through the first half of the year, we've not had an impact. And as we get into the second half of the year, we've talked about the $0.15 to $0.20 of AOP that we expect to add for the kitting and the storage program in our Medical-Surgical business. As I mentioned, a lot of that production is already underway and still a little bit too early for us in terms of providing any guidance on the vaccine program. That program is still evolving with the coordination with the CDC.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Understood. And in terms of the $0.15 to $0.20, just was wondering if you could equate that into like potentially some number of doses or vaccinations or people vaccinated. I'm just trying to understand whether like as far as the kitting and supplies component of this goes, is this sort of the entire opportunity, this $0.15 or $0.20? Or are we looking at something, I'm not sure whether it'd be larger or smaller, obviously, but whether we'd be looking at some kind of earnings contribution as we move into your next fiscal year?
Britt Vitalone
executiveThe $0.15 to $0.20 is the visibility that we have in terms of what's going to be required to support vaccine distribution for the balance of this year. I think that it's possible that the program around kitting and certainly storage could extend beyond FY '21. But what we've guided to is the visibility that we have in terms of the kits that are going to be necessary to be built and distributed for FY '21. That's really the only visibility that we have at this point.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Okay. So then as we kind of come back to the core sort of U.S. pharma business, you guys spent a lot of time talking about the nonlinear pace of recovery for both prescription volumes and also provider visits. Unfortunately, we've seen an intensification of COVID-19 cases across most of the country. I guess what's the latest you can share about the pace of recovery and how it's been impacted by the recent upswing?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. So what we've seen, we saw a recovery faster than we had anticipated in our first quarter. And that really began in the second half of June. And really in through the majority of Q3, we saw really better volumes than we had anticipated. As I talked about on our call, we saw that begin to stabilize in terms of the volumes and begin to flatten out. And that's really been the trends that we've seen since that point in time. So I think that's very supportive of the comments that I made on the call where we expect that the full recovery is going to extend beyond this year and that it's going to be -- there's going to be some bumps along the way. We do expect a full recovery to occur. But given the fact that we've seen volumes and patient mobility begin to flatten out, that really supports that extension of a full recovery beyond this fiscal year.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Yes, that makes sense. And then you guys were pretty clear on the most recent earnings call that guidance does embed a couple of assumptions around COVID, one of which is that there isn't a second wave that leads to shelter-at-home and like other rounds of economic lockdowns. Fortunately, it feels like we're kind of at that point to a certain degree. But just wondering if you could speak a little bit about how the company approached the development of guidance for second half. And then just general level of comfort with the trends you're seeing today kind of fitting in with that qualification you met.
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. So when we're putting together -- that's a great question. As we were putting together our second quarter guidance, we weren't seeing these significant spikes in really hotspots across the country. And that's why we really reiterated the fact that we're not going to be guiding to a second wave, which -- it's hard for us to predict that. And so what we're trying to do is give you a sense for building guidance around the trends that we were seeing around prescriptions, the trends that we were seeing around patient utilization and mobility and some of the momentum that we were seeing in the underlying business. And obviously, we've seen a faster recovery in the first half of the year. Our core business has continued to perform quite well, and that was supportive of the raise that we did to the full year. We couldn't really predict the significant increase that we've seen in cases. And it's -- I think it's still hard to really judge what those cases are going to translate into in terms of prescription volumes and patient visits. We've seen those really just sort of flatten out. So I think we'll know a little bit more as we get through the next 6 or so weeks of the quarter and should have a better perspective on what the impact in this second wave, if you will, has had. I just don't think that the country is going to lockdown like it did before. I think we've learned a lot. I think we've learned how to manage through this better than we originally did. But again, I think we'll know more in about 5 or 6 weeks.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Yes, that's fair. And then the other guidance assumption, just kind of continuing off of that, there's no systemic customer insolvency events. I think you previously had made a comment that you hadn't really seen any type of issues on the credit side there. Can you just give us an update on what you're seeing on this front like big picture sort of the health of your customer base and the trends you're seeing there and what you're hearing?
Britt Vitalone
executiveAbsolutely, and that is correct. We have not seen any impacts to our -- material impacts to our customers at this point. Our customers have been quite resilient. We've partnered very closely with them. I think some of the programs that were put in place at the beginning of the year really helped really the spike that we saw from the initial phase of COVID. Our customers have really responded quite well. And again, we're encouraged by the resilience that we've seen. We're encouraged that the risks that we could see from a situation like this, we've just not seen yet. So we'll just continue to work very closely with our customers. But at this point, we've not seen any material impacts at all.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Okay. And then maybe we'll move on to talk about Med-Surg a little bit. Obviously, the company has seen a pretty material benefit from short-term drivers around like PP&E and lab. I guess as we think about the margin profile of that opportunity versus the margin profile of the core base medical business, how do those things compare to each other? Is there any kind of noticeable difference we should be thinking about in terms of the performance this year?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. So I'd just maybe make a couple of comments here first. The lab business itself is one that we've invested in over the last several years. We've made a small acquisition a few years ago. We've continued to develop programs in coordination with many of the manufacturers. So we have a very strong lab business that existed. It's benefited from not only the investments that we've made but certainly, the increased volume from COVID testing. PP&E is one that certainly spiked at the beginning of the year as I think there was a lot of fear that there's going to be scarcity in supply. That's a component of our business that is at a lower margin than the core business. It is a component of our primary care business, which we talked about earlier on in the year of being roughly 60% of the total medical business, but it is at a lower margin than the rest of the business. It's an important part to the business, obviously, that is supportive for our customers and we've seen it spike. But again, like I talked about earlier, we've seen that sort of stabilize and flatten out as well. So certainly, the volumes that we're seeing are from the continued performance of the core, which has been very solid. And the foundations and fundamentals are continuing to be strong but also additive from PPE volumes and COVID testing.
Stephen Baxter
analystI see, okay. And then maybe you could just give us an idea of -- obviously, like sourcing for PP&E has been a bit of a challenge across the industry. It seems like you guys have managed it fairly well. Can you maybe talk a little bit about what you've seen in terms of sourcing costs for PP&E throughout the year? And then in general, just kind of refresh us on to the extent you experience higher PP&E cost, what's the contractual arrangement with the customer? Are you able to pass those higher costs through to the customer and maintain your margin? Is that a difficult thing to do in this environment? Any color there would be helpful.
Britt Vitalone
executiveLet me try to unpack those questions. They're all great questions. If I miss one, you can certainly remind me, I'll come back to it. But I would just say a few things here. Certainly, the significant demand increases that we saw at the beginning of the year put some stress on the overall system. I think this is an area where we've built tremendous amount of relationships over the years, not only with our national brand suppliers but with our private brand suppliers. And I think that was very supportive for our ability to secure the supply necessary to meet our customer demand. I would also just point out that we are not a manufacturer of these products. We source these products on behalf of our customers. We don't manufacture these products like others do. So for us to strengthen and maintain the relationships that we have allowed us to really secure that supply. Certainly, as we've seen price increases, we are able to pass some of those on. I mean, obviously, this is just a basic economic supply and demand as you would expect. But as suppliers have taken price increases, we've been able to pass some of those on, some we've been unable to pass on. It really just depends on the product and the demand for that product. But overall, we've not seen a significant impact to our margins from pricing changes to this point.
Stephen Baxter
analystOkay. And then another question that's been coming up a lot is that President-elect Biden seems to want to take a very different approach to PP&E, like a very coordinated national approach, potentially continuing to utilize Defense Production Act. At this point, what insight do you have into what changes we might see as the new administration comes in? Any insight into that would be great.
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. We just -- I don't have any insight that I can offer here on that. Certainly, we're well positioned whether there's a change in the philosophy of an administration or not. I think our business, again, given the strength of the relationships that we have built over time, we'll be able to support whatever direction the government wants to go in.
Stephen Baxter
analystUnderstood. And then just thinking -- to close out the medical segment, at least for the questions I have, it looks like guidance for the rest of the year on the operating profit line implies something relatively consistent to the number that you guys just put up for your fiscal Q2 despite the fact that you're talking about bringing on this kitting opportunity, the $0.15 or $0.20. Can you just give us a sense of sort of what's built into the guidance for an assumption around -- does the core improve further into Q3, into Q4? Are you going to assume that PP&E and lab are contributing at the same level? Just an understanding of what the moving parts are for why that, including an ancillary supply opportunity, wouldn't imply an uplift versus the Q2 level.
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. Look, I would point out that we saw an acceleration of demand through faster reopening than we had anticipated in the second quarter. And we saw an acceleration in certain categories like COVID testing and PP&E. We expect and we have seen to this point that, that level has really flattened out. And so the -- really the acceleration or the spike that we saw in the second quarter, it's just not a sustainable level of volume for those types of categories. The underlying core business continues to be fundamentally sound. It continues to grow, and we're very pleased with that. So I think what you're seeing is our view, which has played out, that the recovery will take longer than we had originally anticipated. And that the volumes, the peak volumes that we saw for a couple of categories, are going to flatten out and stabilize, and that's what we've seen to this point.
Stephen Baxter
analystOkay. Makes sense. Then switching topics a little bit to touch on opioids and the litigation there. You made some new disclosures in the 10-Q that went a lot further into describing the status of the negotiation there. From the outside, at least to us, it seems like things are progressing reasonably well. I guess what are the key factors from here that dictate whether you will or will not be able to reach an agreement? And when do you expect to have visibility into these items?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. So there's really not a lot of incremental information that I can provide on that. We continue to work towards a global resolution, which we think will be the best for all parties. As we've talked about before, our goal in this is to ring-fence the risk of continuing litigation in that process. So there's not a lot of new incremental information. What we did in our second quarter 10-Q was -- just as a reminder, we did not book a reserve for litigation. What we did do is provide a little more information through our disclosure in the Q to provide you the information that was pertinent to that point in time. We thought that, that would be useful to investors. But again, we've not reached the point from an accounting perspective where we have a probable and estimable event, and that's why we didn't book a reserve.
Stephen Baxter
analystUnderstood. And then just one follow-up there, like if we were to reach a pretty broad settlement on the opioid front, you guys have a considerable amount of legal expenses running through the P&L. I think it's $160 million is the most recent number. What would that look like a couple of years post settlement?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes, that's a great question. And look, we try to be very transparent about the costs that we have to defend ourselves in these various litigation suits across the country. I think it's a little hard to speculate on that. Again, our goal is to reach a global settlement, but it's difficult for me to project exactly whether every litigation is closed out or not. So it's hard for me to provide for you what that's exactly going to look like. But if we were to reach a global settlement, certainly, the level of litigation defense that we have now, you wouldn't expect that same level going forward.
Stephen Baxter
analystGot it. Okay. And then sort of a transition from there to the capital deployment front, will having a clearer sense of the opioid liability impact how the company looks at deploying capital?
Britt Vitalone
executiveWell, I would say -- I mean, it's a great question, and I appreciate it. I would just say that we have not changed our approach to capital deployment at this -- to this point in time. We continue to have a balanced approach to our capital deployment. That is unchanged. We continue to prioritize growth. We think there's a tremendous amount of opportunities for us to grow along the strategies that we've outlined in oncology and biopharma services. We're very excited about the opportunities there. We want to continue to grow the company. And if we can do that through M&A, great, as long as it's aligned to our strategy and has superior returns to what our shareholders would expect. And if not, we'll continue to return capital back to our shareholders as we have to this point in time. We have a modest but growing dividend and we have repurchased shares. We repurchased shares in a fairly material way last year. We repurchased shares in the second quarter, and that will continue to be a part of how we deploy capital. So I would just say that we have a strong balance sheet. We have a very stable credit rating. Those are priorities for the company, and that has allowed us to continue to employ our balanced approach to deploying capital.
Stephen Baxter
analystYes. And thinking about how much cash the company generates, a question we get a decent amount is what's the thought process around potentially paying a more meaningful dividend? Could you give us any insight into what the company's thought process is around that because, yes, it seems to me like you could comfortably increase the dividend at a faster rate than you have been over the past few years?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. Well, look, we -- I'd just remind you, we've been raising our dividend. It is a modest dividend, but it is one that has been growing. We expect to continue to grow it. You should expect to see us continue to grow it in line with the adjusted operating profit. I think that would be prudent to expect. But we think that there's opportunities to grow the business. And as I talked about, that's a priority for the company is to grow the business. And if not, we think that returning capital in the form of shares is also a great return for our shareholders. So the dividend will continue to be a component of our capital deployment. We are committed to the dividend. But again, our priorities are around growth. And again, we'll continue to repurchase shares and return capital to our shareholders that way.
Stephen Baxter
analystUnderstood. All right. So then maybe for the last 5 minutes here, I'll try to fit in some of the questions that had come in. So if -- again, if anyone wants to try to submit a question, I'm happy to try to fit it in if we have time. So one coming in about regulation. So the press is reporting that HHS may finalize the rebate rule this week. Assuming that it's too late at this point to implement that for 2021, if it was implemented effective for 2022, would the company have enough time to be able to adjust its contracts? Just a broader big picture question about the rebate rule and operationally what the company would need to do to adjust if that is to come back.
Britt Vitalone
executiveFair question, one obviously that I've not given a lot of recent thought to. These proposals have been around for a couple of years now. I suppose that it's possible that they could find their way back to the proposal table again. Hard for me to speculate because I don't know what form that rebate rule might come out, what would be included in that. I would just point out that we continue -- we always are evolving our relationships with our manufacturing partners. That's part of our relationships and process. I feel very good about the relationships that we have, certainly not only from a distribution perspective but from a biopharma services perspective and some of the things that we do to support their businesses and support their products. So I guess, in short, difficult for me to comment on a rule that I haven't seen. I'm not sure what would be in that. But I feel confident that we have the relationships and the capabilities and services that we'll be able to manage through it.
Stephen Baxter
analystOkay. And then another question here, a different topic on biosimilars. I guess the first part of the question looks that adoption rates have been a lot higher for recent launches, I guess, than they were earlier on. I guess what is the company doing to help drive biosimilar adoption? Can you talk a little bit about why biosimilars represent more favorable economics for the company? And in general, how to think about how this impacts the P&L if, in theory, a biosimilar is replacing legacy reference brand drug?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes, biosimilars are -- really represent a great opportunity. And certainly, we've seen some biosimilars launched in the last few years. They've been both health systems-based biosimilars or I should say, the predominant volume had gone through health systems. And now we're seeing more that are going through specialties and clinics and oncologists. And certainly, as they go through the clinic setting and the oncology setting, we have GPO services that we can provide. Certainly, the U.S. oncology network is making clinical choice around that. So there's more impact that the oncologists are having on choice. So generally speaking, the biosimilars represent better margins for us than branded or specialty products generally speaking because we're providing more services, because we're providing GPO services. And it's providing more choice and clinical choice to the provider. So we're excited about biosimilars. We think that they're a win-win-win in the sense that it's more clinical choice for the providers, it's better economics for McKesson, and it's a lower cost for the patient. And it's not material yet to our overall enterprise financial statement, but it continues to grow. And it's an area that we think that is going to be very additive to the oncology in the clinic setting.
Stephen Baxter
analystUnderstood. All right. So then we're down to the last couple of minutes here. I'll try to just squeeze maybe 2 more in. A question here on generics. The questioner suggests that they think that deflation has moderated somewhat during this period of the global pandemic. Was hoping you could talk about what the company is seeing on the sourcing side and whether there's been any, I guess, trade-off between the ability to improve sourcing costs and ensuring availability of supply that we might have to think about eventually normalizing?
Britt Vitalone
executiveGreat question. We have a great position in generics. We have a very scaled and proficient sourcing operation, great partners that are a part of that. We continue to source. We believe as well or better than anybody else. We're always making the trade-off between cost and adequacy of supply. I mean, ultimately, we need to make sure that there's adequate supply for our customers so that it's not a unique trade-off or unique situation that we're dealing with. We deal with it very well. We have high compliance rates with our customer base. And we're seeing good stability, both on the buy side and on the sell side. And combine that with really a disciplined approach that we're taking to the sell side and with our customers, and we think that the generics business is very supportive of continued growth.
Stephen Baxter
analystAll right. And then the last one, this is one for me. Just as we look out a couple of years from now, it looks like the company always had an opportunity to revisit a lot of the ways that it does business as a result of the challenges from COVID-19. As we look out a couple of years, how do you think your business will look different as a result of having gone through this pandemic?
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes, it's a great question. I think there's both business aspects to it and then, obviously, there's people aspect to it. I'd say that COVID has not changed our strategy in any way. We still believe that the opportunities are great in the areas of oncology and biopharma services, and so we're very excited about that. I do think that it has, in fact, reinforced those strategies. I think we feel even more confident that we have the right positioning and the right tools and capabilities to be successful there. I think that it certainly has changed our perspective on how we work. Think about how automation is important to back office functions, the way that you operate in the back office, all of those things, we're developing better capabilities, better efficiencies around. So I think the way that we work and the way that our people work is going to have a bigger impact from COVID than necessarily our strategy.
Stephen Baxter
analystMakes sense. Okay. With that, we've now completed our time. So I don't want to keep you any longer. Really appreciate you guys joining us for our conference. I hope you're staying safe; hope you're well. And we'll be in touch soon.
Britt Vitalone
executiveThanks so much. I appreciate it as well.
Stephen Baxter
analystThanks a lot. Yes, take it easy. Have a good night.
Britt Vitalone
executiveYes. All right, bye-bye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete McKesson Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to McKesson Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.