Melexis NV (MELE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 3, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorHello, and welcome to the Melexis full year 2020 results. My name is Judy, and I'll be the coordinator for today's event. Please note that the call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over to your host, Francoise Chombar, CEO, to begin today's conference. Thank you.
Françoise Chombar
executiveThank you, operator. Dear audience, I sincerely hope that you and your close ones are all healthy and well. Thank you for joining the Melexis Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Earnings Call. Next, to new hopes for the vaccine, the new Year is bringing new opportunities. And together with Karen Van Griensven, our CFO, we'll be glad to talk to you about both the past and the future and answer any question you might have. During the pandemic, the Melexis values were and are our best vaccine, and that shows in our 2020 results. Thanks to the proactive supply chain and inventory management that Melexis adopted and that allowed us to already sequentially grow 21% in sales for the third quarter. We added another 21% sequential growth in the fourth quarter despite a tiny negative euro/dollar exchange rate impact. Q4 came out at EUR 147.4 million, the best quarter ever in the Melexis history. This made us conclude the rollercoaster year with a 4% year-over-year sales growth. Considering worldwide car production contracted by an estimated 15%, this is no small accomplishment. Based on 2020 data, we can now state that on average, every new car worldwide carries 13 Melexis chips onboard from 11 the year before. Another record, showing that Melexis is well underway on its road from 10 to 20. Outperforming product lines in 2020 were temperature, pressure and current sensors and smart drivers for fans and pumps. There was also significant growth for our magnetic latches and switches and for embedded lighting drivers. Already at our previous earnings call, we estimated customer inventories to be at low levels. Today, it looks like everyone in the industry is meanwhile delivering hand to mouth. There is heavy restocking going on. And the bullwhip effect in supply chains is hitting the industry more vehemently than ever before. The root of the matter is that the downstream customer base waited for too long to reorder and most didn't sufficiently take into account that it takes a physical cycle time of months to reignite a semiconductor supply chain. We believe that there is overheated holding in our markets today, which we expect to continue into the second quarter. While remaining cautious about the evolution of market demand in the second half of the year, the Melexis outlook for a 15% to 20% sales growth in 2021 is a combination of 3 favorable factors. Automotive and demand has returned, particularly in China, where car sales has rebounded since June. And customers worldwide are now replenishing their inventories at an astonishing rate. Two is content growth. Melexis and its customers won several new programs that are now ramping up, some also at an unexpected speed. Cases in point are embedded lighting and many new applications for electric vehicles and hybrids. Last but not least, and as mentioned already at several occasions last year, the adjacent portion of our sales grew more than 50% versus 2019, in line with our strategic intent. Also in 2021, the creativity and engagement of our people will allow us to thrive. And I want to thank all Melexians for showing the high level of customer support they're demonstrating every day. In these on/off pandemic times, our business creation teams have been remarkably prolific, too, and 2020 marked another record, namely in total product launches. During the fourth quarter alone, we launched no less than 8 new products, half of which are specifically conceived for adjacent markets, such as 2-/3-wheelers, home applications and Industry 4.0. Newly launched automotive products include current sensors, a smart tire sensor and a novel motor driver for mechatronic applications all of which serve the future car, carbon-free and intelligent. Before I hand the stage to Karen, please allow me to point out another announcement we made this morning right after the publication of our full year results. And that concerns the change in the Board and management. I'm thrilled to announce that Marc Biron will take over my role as CEO as from August 1. I will take over the chair from Roland Duchâtelet on the same day. Roland will remain a member of the Board. Marc will also be joining our Board, subject to shareholders' approval in May. These changes in no way mean a change of strategy. On the contrary, Melexis is in the starting blocks for the new decade and Marc and I are looking forward to contributing to the best imaginable future with our technologies and together with our people and our customers. It's with pleasure that I now pass on to you, Karen, for more color on the financials.
Karen Van Griensven
executiveThank you, Francoise. So good morning, everybody. As mentioned already, Melexis sales came out at EUR 507.5 million for the full year 2020, an increase of 4%, and a small EUR/USD exchange rate effect that was negative of around 1%. The gross results was EUR 198 million or 39% of sales, an increase of 1% compared to 2019. R&D expenses were 15.3% of sales, G&A came out at 6.1% of sales and selling was at 2.7% of sales. The operating results was EUR 75.5 million or 14.9% of sales, an increase of 7% compared to EUR 70.6 million in 2019. The net result was EUR 69.3 million or EUR 1.72 per share, an increase of 15% compared to EUR 60.3 million or EUR 1.49 per share in 2019. If we look then at the fourth quarter, so the fourth quarter came out at EUR 147.4 million, so the highest quarter ever for Melexis. An increase of 16% compared to the same quarter of the previous year and an increase of 21% compared to the previous quarter. Also here, we have a EUR/USD exchange rate effect that was negative for an amount of around 3%. The gross results was EUR 58.3 million or 39.5% of sales, an increase of 16% compared to the same quarter of last year, and an increase of 30% compared to the previous quarter. R&D expenses were 13.7% of sales, G&A was at 5.9% of sales, and selling was at 2.5%. The operating result was EUR 25.8 million or 17.5% of sales, an increase of 41% compared to the same quarter of last year and an increase of 64% compared to the previous quarter. The net result was EUR 24 million or EUR 0.59 per share, an increase of 56% compared to EUR 15.4 million or EUR 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 61% compared to the previous quarter. The Board of Directors also took a decision towards the final dividend. So the total dividend payable over 2020 is EUR 2.20, at least that is the proposal. EUR 1.30 was already paid out, but 0.9% -- EUR 0.90 per share is still payable after the Board -- the shareholders' decision in May. The outlook for Melexis. So Melexis expects sales to be -- in the first quarter of 2021 to be in the range of EUR 155 million to EUR 160 million. For the full year 2021, Melexis expects sales growth between 15% and 20% with a gross profit margin around 41% and an operating margin around 19% at the midpoint of the sales guidance, and all taking into account a EUR/USD exchange rate of around 1.21. So I would like to now propose to open the session of Q&A. So operator, please go ahead.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question in the queue is coming from the line of Francois Bouvignies from UBS.
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystI just wanted to say, first, I mean, Francoise, after all those years, I think it's a consensus to say that your execution and insight communication were highly appreciated in the investor community. So I just wanted to say thank you for that. Even though you are still around, it's still I wanted to say that. I have a couple of questions. The first one is on your full year guidance. Could you give us the production that you have for the industry in '21 by any chance?
Françoise Chombar
executiveThank you, Francois. Well, thank you first for your compliment. I would like to add that I didn't do that alone, of course. There are 1,500 Melexians around the globe that managed to put that good result on the table. So I -- I'm definitely not alone in doing that. Your question was about the future. Could you repeat it because I'm not sure I really get your question. Could you repeat the question?
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystYes. So in your full year guidance of 15% to 20% for '21, how much do you have for the production volume for the industry? What did you have in your forecast?
Françoise Chombar
executiveFor the -- for which industry do you need me to...
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystCar -- car industry.
Françoise Chombar
executiveI guess the automotive industry. Well, what -- yes, the point is that, of course, already in June last year, the car industry started to pick up again in China, and it has continued to pick up. I think you see also that there is some recovery in the U.S. Europe stays a bit behind for the time being. But what we see is that mainly in Europe, we're doing well because of mainly -- so we're doing well, not only because of the recovery as a whole worldwide, but also because -- and that is particularly in Europe. We have quite some new applications that are coming on board in the course of 2021 and have started already last year. So that is, I think, the general perspective. Now if you look at the number of vehicles that are forecasted to be sold in 2021, it does not yet reach the volume that we had in '19, let alone in '18. So I think the industry will still need some time to recover further, particularly in the U.S. and in Europe. But what is clear to us already is that on the one hand, we have, as I said, there are 3 factors to our guidance. The first factor is, of course, the recovery as such, which, in our view, okay, you never know what the pandemic does, but with the vaccines coming, we think that recovery is underway, and people will be glad to be able to consume again and to pick up some of the normality of before. So there is, first of all, the recovery. There is, secondly, the restocking, which is, of course, at a higher run rate at this time than the real run rate of the end demand that is behind it, but that is normal, let's say, that's pretty logical. As such, as long as it is not over -- an overreaction, it's okay. There is, secondly, the content growth, as I mentioned, many new applications, a lot of embedded light drivers, and it's not just light for comfort or making your car look nice, but it's a lot of light also in combination with safety, with driver warnings from, let's say, more static light to highly animated light that you find also in high-end cars more and more, also in China. So we're particularly also growing there in China. And we see a lot of new applications on the electric vehicles and hybrids because, yes, there are simply new applications, as we've already mentioned in the past, and we're glad to be able to take those opportunities as well, with all the new products that we've launched in the past year. And then thirdly, the outlook. The third factor is that the adjacent markets have grown tremendously in 2020. And we see that, yes, most of these wins or these awards are sustainable going forward.
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystOkay. That's very clear. And maybe a follow-up on your drivers. I mean when you speak about inventories as well as restocking. When I look at 2020, for automotive, at least, your growth was plus 1%. And you said the production was minus 15% for the year. So it's significant, 16% outperformance. So of course, in '19, you had this opposite, right, of destocking, and you mentioned the whip effect quite often. So my question is this outperformance in 2020, which is more than most of your peers in automotive. To which extent you had already restocking of your products, not Melexis, but all your products in 2020 and when I look at '21 in this context, I mean even if we assume volume slightly below '19, it's still more than 15% of the production unit. So your guidance of 15%, 20% doesn't seem to reflect much of the content or does it mean that you are conservative? Or does it mean you have a destocking in '21, if you see where I want to go?
Françoise Chombar
executiveI don't think there will be a destocking, but there will be some fluctuation, of course, on the market. And we try to -- as you know, Francois, we always try to be as realistic as possible in our guidance. The fact that we, as you say, did a bit better than most of our competitors in 2020 is because we are extremely proactive. We understand this bullwhip effect in supply chains. And as you know, we've kept our inventories high, and we started already new material ahead -- way ahead of the orders that we got because the orders picked up a bit in September, more in October and went heavily up November, December, and they are still pretty high. And we had a head start in delivering to our customers in the fourth quarter already because of that proactive supply chain management. So some of the restocking, our customers have already done last year because we allowed them to do that. This year, I can only say that certainly in the first half, we have quite good order behavior, quite good visibility. Of course, in the second half is still a question mark. And you may call it cautious. But we call it, we say what we see at the time that we make the statement. And that is a statement that we are happy to make. If you look at the car production or car sales, let's say, prognosis. It's going from 74 million to 84 million units, more or less, which is close to 14%. We say it will be -- ours will be between 15% and 20%. I think that does include some of the additional volumes, taking into account that some of the restocking is behind us for Melexis already -- for Melexis customers already. I hope that answers your question.
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystYes. Yes. And the last one for me is on the shortage that is very -- discussed in the industry at the moment. So I was just wondering if you see any impact on your side. I mean I know you have high inventories, but -- you can handle that, but do you see any pricing increase at the foundry level or the packaging side that could impact the gross margin? And how should we think about the gross margin in terms of underutilization charges or a negative impact this quarter quantified would be great? And that's all for me.
Karen Van Griensven
executiveSo on the gross margin, so the impact in Q4 was, as we predicted, there was still a strong impact of 1.4% after revaluation of the inventory. So the U.S. dollar content in our inventory, the revaluation resulted in an increase -- a decrease of the gross margin of 1.4%. It was more in Q3, it was more than 2% then. It reduced somewhat to 1.4%. It's still an important impact. Moving forward, the impact, there might still be some impact, but it will be small with the current U.S. dollar levels. The underutilization, in general, there is still some underutilization. But on the other hand, we will also take -- start using our new facilities from Q2 in Bulgaria. So that will also additionally increase the cost base for our manufacturing so that all in all, we do not expect a lot of leverage from our internal operational costs in 2021. Is that sufficient answer?
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
analystYes, that's very clear. And the shortage, I mean, any impact on your side on the cost or...
Françoise Chombar
executiveWell, it's clear that some of the -- that there are some price increases that have been announced. We have raw materials that are more expensive. However, we have long-term contracts with most of our suppliers. And we always consider -- when we do negotiations, whether it's with our suppliers or with our customers, we always consider the whole business relationship in that long-term perspective. That doesn't mean that we will not have any price increases by our suppliers. Price increases towards our customer base, that remains very hard in the automotive industry, because there are many elements impacting price setting. And in some cases, we will indeed increase some of the prices if, for example, the underlying material cost has surged significantly. But Melexis is loyal to its loyal customers.
Operator
operatorAnd the next question in the queue is coming from the line of Varun Rajwanshi from JPMorgan.
Varun Rajwanshi
analystI have 3 questions. The first one is on the adjacent end market opportunities. This business is currently at EUR 60 million annual run rate. And you've been introducing new products specifically to address this market. And the design and momentum has also been good recently. How should we think about the revenue profile of this business in '21 and going forward? The second question is around electric vehicles and hybrids. Francoise, you mentioned in your comments that there are several new applications for EVs and hybrids that you're targeting with your products. So the question is, do you track how much of your sales comes from EVs and hybrids? And how has that business been growing? And can you also elaborate on the design and momentum for electric vehicle and hybrid applications? And finally, on your market share in magnetic sensor ICs, you mentioned that you're now addressing 13 chips on average per car. Can you also comment on your market share in magnetic sensors overall? And how has that trended through 2020?
Françoise Chombar
executiveOkay. That's a lot of questions, Varun. Let me start by the first one. So the adjacent, yes, we have been, as you have noticed also or may have noticed in our product launches for some time now, we are launching new products, specifically designed and aimed at adjacent markets. You will find those mostly in temperature sensors, in magnetic latches and switches, in some position sensors, in smart drivers and, yes, here and there also -- and current sensors, not to forget current sensors as well for the server market, for the solar market, et cetera. So that is one. So it was a strategic intent. And of course, our business creation people have been, as I said, very productive in that area. And we aim currently and are progressing currently in the following main markets. So you mentioned the 2-/3-wheelers, the e-scooters, the e-bikes. And what we recognize in our markets is that, one, our existing customers are also going there and because they know us, it's for them an easy transition, let's say, to use our products. They know us, plus in many occasions, the product is already there and can be used as is before we then make -- yes, sometimes an existing product serves as a base for a specific adjacent product as well, which makes it pretty easy. But what we also see is that there are new customers on board -- coming on board and using our automotive expertise, if you take also like these last mile connected vehicles that are coming on the stage more and more or Industry 4.0 applications in warehouses or on campuses, in hospitals, et cetera. Even if they are industrial applications, they do need the safety levels that Melexis is used to from the automotive industry. For us, it is, I'm not going to say it's easy, but at least it's -- it might be easier than for other companies to transpose this knowledge and this know how into specific adjacent products, targeting alternative mobility, last mile urban area connected vehicles, et cetera. So I think that is one of the aspects that is extremely important. And secondly, and it's a boost we got from the pandemic, but it's also very sustainable and has to do with health applications, where particularly the temperature sensors, but also magnetic position sensors, latches and switches, smart drivers are very wanted. And we see that really as sustainable for access control, buildings for diagnose equipment where you need, for example, a very stable temperature accuracy. So it is -- that is the second one. And the last one is everything that has to do with the fact that due to the pandemic, we people are shopping online, meeting online, entertaining online, everything is online. And that has, of course, boosted the connectivity market, the server farms and all these need energy and thermal management. And our products are really very well suited and are in the sweet spot of that market as well. So those are the 3 markets that we are successful in today, where we have launched new products last year and which will continue to come on board more and more in the coming years. So we see that as a positive spot to be in. That's your first question. The second question was on EVs and hybrids. Giving you an answer on what percentage of our sales is in EVs and hybrids, that's really, really a difficult question to answer. Because there's not only -- I mean the -- if you take it for the powertrain, we've published -- I would like to lead you to the presentation on our website, where we have updated our view on the market versus the different areas. And what you will see is that, for example, the hybrids have increased quite a bit. And our -- the sockets that we address there or can address there are also quite good and are continuing to increase. But of course, it's not only the powertrain. I mean there are many more applications. We've added a -- I think we've added Tesla example in the presentation. So this is a new slide, an updated slide from the one we had already used like 2 years ago, where you see that we have increased also the number of parts in the Tesla Model 3 and that gives you also a sense of it's not only the powertrain. There are many other applications in the body, in safety, in chassis that these new vehicles -- new energy vehicles are taking on board. But I honestly cannot give you any percentage because it's already hard to understand. It's a lot of work to understand which parts are used in which car because that's a myriad of possibilities. But what we are -- what I'm very positive in is that we understand the systems behind it. And many of our technologies find their application in those new vehicles, whether it's in the powertrain or in the body, chassis, and safety systems. Then the third question was the market share of magnetics. I think the market share of magnetics is more or less unchanged. The magnetic sensors, we have -- if you look at our product launches last year, we've launched quite a number of new current sensors, of new latches and switches as well, position sensors, where we see that -- and what we will see going forward is that we are bringing new parts on board that are specifically aimed at the electric vehicle and hybrid market. Why? Because you have a different environment. In electric vehicles, you have much more disturbance around. Hybrid and electric vehicles, you have more disturbances around. And our position sensors, we have slowly adopted -- or gradually, not slowly. I don't think we were slow. We have gradually adopted our product to serve also those markets. So I think our market share is steady. And we're gaining market share in the current sensor arena, also thanks to new products and to specifically applications in EVs and hybrids. I hope that answers all your questions for us.
Varun Rajwanshi
analystYes, it does.
Operator
operatorAnd the next person in the queue is Matthias Maenhaut from Kepler.
Matthias Maenhaut
analystAlso 3 questions from my end. First question is actually more surrounding capital expenditures. So I recall that when we were coming out of 2017, at the start 2018, you announced a pretty important investment plan of some EUR 125 million. I recall that a part of that has been postponed. A part of that has been executed. How should we think about this plan going forward? Will this now be executed? And how should we think about CapEx and CapEx phasing both next year and over the years to come? And I have 2 more, but I will ask them one by one.
Karen Van Griensven
executiveAll right. So on the CapEx, I don't think we ever had more than EUR 100 million as planned. But indeed, we have high investment levels in 2017, '18, rather in the EUR 70 million, EUR 80 million range, I think. But yes, for this year, it was -- for 2020, it was clearly lower. It was rather around EUR 25 million. And for 2021, we expect levels of around EUR 40 million. So definitely, still way below the high levels we had a few years ago. Moving beyond that, that is -- yes, we are not prepared to give guidance on that today. But for 2021, we expect levels rather around EUR 40 million, of which EUR 10 million will still be for the Bulgaria facility.
Matthias Maenhaut
analystOkay. Second question was actually on content growth. So indeed, very nice growth, growing from (sic) [ to ] 13 ICs from 11. How should we think about this going forward? Will this further accelerate over the coming couple of years? Or is this pace pretty much the pace you're aiming for going forward?
Françoise Chombar
executiveWell, content growth for us, Matthias, is definitely continuing. There are quite some new products in the pipe, as I mentioned. We've already launched quite a lot of them last year, and it will go on this year. I think our understanding of the market and of the new requirements is very good. And I'm positive about the ability of Melexis to serve the future transformed auto industry going forward. Is that an answer or do you have additional questions on that?
Matthias Maenhaut
analystYes. No, I recall there was a target to grow to 20, I think, by 2023. Is that a target to -- is that target still valid? Do you still aim to grow to 20 ICs per car by 2023, because it do kind of implies a significant acceleration? How should we think about that?
Françoise Chombar
executiveI don't think we put a year on it when we announced this, that was even, I think, in 2018, if I'm not mistaken. So the world was quite different at the time. But we didn't put a year on it. Definitely, we -- that is -- that continues to be our goal. And what we see is that with a pretty, let's say, depressed car industry in 2020, we were still able to increase our content in 2020 from 11 to 13. So I would say that is a good sign for the coming years. And definitely, that would be nice to have this by '23, but let's see what the world does in the coming years and let's see what Melexis does, but that's definitely our long-term target still, yes.
Matthias Maenhaut
analystOkay. Very clear. Last question is actually on gross margins. How should we think about the gross margin in Q1? Is it clearly going to be a quite significant sales uplift? And can we see gross margin decently up because there's also less impact from a weaker U.S. dollar? Also more midterm, how should we think about gross margins given the different growth projects and the shift in the portfolio, I would say, with adjacent clearly taking up a bigger share?
Karen Van Griensven
executiveYes. So on the -- on Q1, indeed, with higher sales levels and also less impact of the U.S. dollar, we do expect our gross margin to be higher than in the fourth quarter. But it's difficult to say to -- at what level because there are many elements that impact positively or negatively, amongst others, the product mix, the capacity utilization, the dollar, the yield loss. There are many aspects that add to this. But yes, under normal circumstances, higher gross margin than Q4. Moving forward, midterm, we still -- yes, we aim to gradually increase our gross margin to better -- because of better capacity utilization, also the product mix adjacent is helping in the margin, limiting price iterations. There are several ways to work on our gross margins. So -- but for the foreseeable future, we stick to rather the levels of the 41%, I would say.
Operator
operatorAnd the next person in the queue is Janardan Menon from the Liberum.
Janardan Menon
analystFrancoise, I'd like to echo Francois's comments earlier, to say what an exceptional job you've done in this company over the -- over your period here, and I think you're leaving it in exceptionally good shape. So congratulations on a great tenure. I guess moving onto the questions. My main focus is on inventory, to be honest, and your comments on inventory. So you were saying that inventories for Melexis or your customer inventories for your parts have started rising before that for other semiconductor companies. So roughly, when did -- when do you think the inventories for your parts at your customer or channel started increasing? Was that around September, October last year? Or was it later than that?
Françoise Chombar
executiveOkay. Well, when you -- maybe you recall in the previous earnings call, we stated that inventories at our customers were, at that time, low -- at low levels. And we had -- we have -- had been warning our customers for their, let's say, low order behavior already for months. We -- because we're getting better and better at managing our supply chain, but it is still very difficult to completely match the order behavior. Even today, it's difficult. I mean it's -- the visibility is, on the one hand, good because customers have ordered a lot, but on the other hand, it's not so good because we don't know how much of that is meant for restocking and how much of that is underlying real demand. And that's an attention point. We know it for some, but we don't know it for all. Now we started -- as you might have noticed in our inventories, we, in fact, kept our inventories high because we know that these -- the parts that we make, or at least most of the parts that we make, not all of them, of course, but most of the parts that we make have no risk of obsolescence. We know that these will be needed to build cars. So for us, it was already clear at the end of Q2 that it would change at some moment in time. And when we saw the market pickup in China in June and then sustainably in July, we already decided in August that we would again put new material in the flow because we are also very aware that the structural capacity constraints in the semiconductor industry, they are not gone. They are still there. And they might even have exacerbated over 2020 because of the pandemic. So we did not see our -- the inventories of our customers replenish that fast. They were just quite late. Some of them were quite late in answer -- in answering to that pickup. And because we were so proactive, we were able to match some of their orders already in Q3, starting Q3, but heavily in Q4 as well. And that's a good thing because we did not, to my knowledge, yet stop any OEM from building cars, while, yes, some of our peers, as you have read in the press, have. So that makes Melexis quite a reliable supplier as such in the automotive industry. Inventories today are still low. Distribution customers, for example -- distribution channel is, for example, not high at all. It's -- and that's not necessarily a sign of higher demand, but rather of, yes, sometimes a bit of panic even because some of the -- our distribution customers might say, "Well, I might not need it, but with all these shortages around, with everything that I'm reading in the press, I better make sure that I have my orders and that I have my parts in-house rather than at the distributor." And so there might be some panic ordering as well. I think we will see more and more clear as the quarter goes on and that come our next earnings call we will be able to give you more information about this. But today, it's a bit difficult to...
Janardan Menon
analystWhat about -- what is your assessment of inventories at OEMs right now? Would you say that that's low? Or has that sort of already come to a normal level?
Françoise Chombar
executiveWe don't have all the details yet. But I believe that the -- that there was not too much change in the inventories of the OEMs at this moment. But of course, there are -- if you go and buy a car, definitely, the EVs -- or the new energy vehicles, EVs or hybrids, they take a long time to deliver. So they don't necessarily have the right parts in stock neither -- the right cars in stock, let's say it like that. But we don't see it as excessive, excessively low or excessively high. I think it's pretty balanced from an OEM perspective. But we don't have all the figures. Again, we don't have all the recent figures. It's too soon to say anything about that at this time.
Janardan Menon
analystAnd if I look at your guidance, normally, in a normal year, you have a seasonal trend which sort of ends up with the second half being above the first half. Your current guidance would clearly suggest that you are now assuming in that guidance that there is a fall in revenues into the second half because if you do 157 times 4, you're at 630, which is much higher than the 15% to 20% midpoint that you're guiding at. So you seem to be factoring in, in your mind, some sort of an inventory correction by the second half -- by Q3 itself. Would that be the way to read this -- your current guidance as strong Q2 and then potentially the start of some normalizing of inventory levels in the second half?
Françoise Chombar
executiveWell, yes, I think you made a good calculation. But again, as I said before, we are trying to always state what we see and do the assessment based on the knowledge we have of the market. And as the year will progress, I'm sure we will be able to give more color on this. And we'll understand more like everybody else will understand more. But we do take into account that what customers are ordering today. Is it a little too much versus the usual run rate that we should be seeing. So yes, that I think you made the right calculation and conclusion.
Janardan Menon
analystAnd just my last question, but on the same point, but this time on gross margin, so can we assume that your guidance for 41% gross margin also has the same pattern where within that, you are assuming a higher gross margin in the first half and the lower gross margin in the second half, in line with your sort of baked in assumptions on revenues within that guidance?
Karen Van Griensven
executiveYes. Indeed, higher loading in the first half and lower loading in the second half has impact on the gross margin. Yes. The more load, the higher -- the higher the margin because of, yes, the utilization in our factory. That is...
Janardan Menon
analystUnderstood. I hope you proved to be way too cautious on your current guidance, but time will tell, I guess.
Operator
operatorAnd the next question in the queue is coming from the line of Ruben Devos from KBC Securities.
Ruben Devos
analystI've got two. Thanks for offering an update on the total addressable market in the presentation. It looks like compared to prior forecast that Melexis chips per car based on powertrain has remained about the same, about 43 chips by 2025, while the share of hybrid or electric cars will further improve relative to internal combustion engines. So just curious whether you could talk a bit about the development and whether that is sort of in line with your earlier expectations? Yes, maybe I'll ask the second one after your answer.
Françoise Chombar
executiveOkay. Okay. Ruben, no problem. So just to make sure that the interpretation of that slide is done in the right way. So what we mentioned here, and I'm looking at Slide 16 now of our presentation that is on the website. You see an estimation of the market compound annual growth rate per type of car between 2020 and 2025. That's one thing. That's an estimation that's based on IHS and Melexis estimates, but we feel that is pretty realistic from today's perspective. Then on the right hand side, you see the total available -- total addressable market for Melexis. And what this means is we look at our technologies, we look at what we master, we look at the systems in the cars today and in the coming years, and we estimate how many of the potential sockets are there today that we could serve, that we not necessarily serve today, of course, because we have only 13 and not, on a weighted average, if you look at the total, we don't have 115, we have 13 as such, and I'm referring to the weighted average in Slide 19 there. But these are the total addressable markets with the technologies that we have, that we master and that we decided to invest in. Some of them we might have had in the past and we decided, well, we think we have a better -- we make a better choice by going to another product, and we will not address that socket. We will address other sockets. And those are decisions that, yes, we make along the way, of course. But what we want to convey with these slides is that in general, whether we talk about powertrain. And definitely, when we talk about chassis body and safety systems, the market content growth potential is fantastic. It goes from 28 to 43 total addressable market for Melexis in the powertrain. And for the other systems, it goes even from 87 to 137. So in total, our markets that we can address with our technologies and with our existing and future products is growing. That is what we call content growth. So in that sense, because we understand what is required and because we do what we do well. And our customers trust us with their new cars, let's say, we do well in general. If I just can give 1 example because it might also help the understanding. Let's take current sensors. Current sensors are needed because of strong electrification, whether you talk about EVs or hybrid cars or mild hybrids, so the 48-volt net, you need electrification in your car. And that represents, for example, high-voltage board net, 48 voltage, high-voltage board net or high-power traction inverters. You need battery management. You need motor control, DC-DC conversion, even charging as well comes on top. And that all requires a multitude of current sensors for monitoring and controls. So even in internal combustion engines, you find current sensors. But the more you go to electrified cars, the more current sensors you will find. And these are included in those sockets that we could address today, but we don't necessarily do. And we are winning new business there as well. But more importantly, going forward, that market is still in evolution and -- in full evolution, in a nice evolution because of the content growth. And yes, that's why we invest in those sockets where we think we make the best -- where we think we have the best opportunities. I hope that answers your question. If not, let me know.
Ruben Devos
analystYes. Then the second one, regarding the APAC region and actually the strong growth numbers you've reported there, the sales share also well above 50% in 2020. I was just curious whether you could talk a bit about the trends in this region in the last few months. Maybe on a somewhat longer-term view, how do you think of future growth rates here relative to the other geographies where you're active in?
Françoise Chombar
executiveYes. Well, of course, it's not a secret that Asia has recovered from the pandemic much faster and much better than we did. I think they managed better. Their culture also manages better. And China, in particular -- not only China, it's also South Korea, for example, has also recovered much better than Europe, for example. But China, definitely, as a case in point, China has been a growth -- our most important growth market for many years in the past. And has been a major driver for our growth in 2020 and will continue to be a major driver for our growth in the coming years. Cars are getting more sophisticated, new energy vehicles. And in fact, what is maybe not known too much, but hybrids are being -- are really successful also in China, and that is, yes, the best of both worlds, if you even look at the full hybrid, the possibility there for sockets for our technology is the highest of all. What we see in China is that they -- their cars are getting more and more content growth as well. And they are very fast, that is particular for China, they are very fast at adopting new technologies, much faster than anyone else in the world. And that, of course, is a good thing because usually, it's there where Melexis scores the best is because we -- our advanced products, sensors and drivers, are solving the problems they want to solve. I mentioned in my introduction embedded lighting, that was almost near 0, maybe 2, 3 years back in China. And now we see a boost of that coming forward, which is a sign of their higher content growth going into the future. So China is important for us. The Asia Pacific region, in general, is important for us, not only China. But if you look at our growth in EMEA, there, you also see growth. So it is not only there. It's also in EMEA. And in EMEA, it's mainly because of the innovation as well because looking at -- whether you look at patents or whether we look into our customer base. Also, Europe has a strength in innovation in automotive. Most of the innovation starts in Europe and then spreads over the world. So let's be a bit chauvinist about this and be happy about the fact that, yes, Europe does have quite a lot of strengths that we can build on.
Operator
operatorAnd the next question in the queue is coming from the line of Marc Hesselink from ING.
Marc Hesselink
analystMy first question is on a comment you made earlier, where you said you see that you have improved visibility on what's happening in your supply chain. Could you explain what you did to get that better visibility?
Françoise Chombar
executiveYes. It's not necessarily visibility in the sense that we know what products will be wanted by which customers and when. So that is not the type of visibility that I meant when I spoke about that, but rather the understanding of the bullwhip effect that many of our peers and most of our customers don't seem to grasp too well. The bullwhip effect, bullwhip is a whip, and the longer your whip is -- if you, yes, actuate the whip, let's say, the longer your whip is, the higher your -- the more vehement your fluctuations will be, and a very small tick on the whip downstream can create enormous waves upstream. The more you go upstream, the bigger the waves are. And that means the longer your supply chain, the longer your cycle times, the longer -- or the more parties -- more tiers are in your supply chain, the bigger these fluctuations will be. And what we did is simple statistics. We said, "Well, if we want to know -- if we want to be ahead of the pack in understanding how our market might evolve, because it's still and remains a prediction, then we have to model it." And we modeled the past, we modeled the -- because all these data are available. So data driven -- it's data-driven statistics in the end. We took all the data we could have from the past, from, for example, the crisis period where you had -- in the financial crisis, '08, '09, and the heavy uptick in end of 2009 going forward into 2010, we took that. We took the data from the years after. We had a high demand in 2018. It went down in '19. Of course, it went down in '20. So we took all these data, put that into a model, and that model helped us to understand that it takes at least 3, 4 months before our customer starts ordering according to the real demand. So you -- the tick you see down or up at the beginning of the cycle, that's where we looked at, the real end demand. And then we understood -- by looking at this data, we understood that we can act 2, 3 months ahead of the change we see in the order behavior of our customers. And then, of course, it's knowledge about the obsolescence risk of our products that gives us then -- that helps us to decide which products we will already be starting, because we know they will need them. We know they will need them. They might be on stock a little longer and that was apparent from the inventory levels that you've seen in 2020. But we know that at some point in time, those parts will be needed by our markets. And because of the fact that now 70% of our business is standard products that are delivered to several customers, that makes it quite easy for us to choose the right products and to have no obsolescence risk on those. And that helps us then to level production to be faster at delivering to our customers. And in the same way, we will also continue to monitor those data going forward so that we will see it coming a bit sooner also than maybe many others because the model -- it's not rocket science. The data are there. Everybody could do it. But we learned a lot from the previous boosts and bus cycles that we have been in, and we use those learnings to steer our supply chain.
Marc Hesselink
analystOkay. That's very clear. And the fact that you had that extra inventory, what does that mean for your long-term business? I can imagine that what you said before, being a more reliable supplier is a big advantage for new order wins? Or is that too simple to think like that?
Françoise Chombar
executiveI think definitely that customers appreciate and they tell us. They appreciate that we are so proactive, and that strengthens our brand in the industry, yes.
Marc Hesselink
analystOkay, clear. And then a final question. In previous calls, you talked about keeping the R&D cost relatively flat and just have more leverage on it and focus the R&D on the products that are most promising. I noticed in the last quarter that it picked up a bit. Is that just a quarterly flick or seasonal? Or are you going to invest a bit more in R&D, also taking into account that you have been very successful with your non-automotive R&D?
Françoise Chombar
executiveYes. So operational expenses in general, they will slightly be -- I mean we will -- we expect them to grow slightly in 2021 versus 2020 or versus Q4, so -- including R&D. However, not in the same -- at the same rate of sales growth, as it is expected today. So we will have some leverage on operating margin from this effect. So we will continue to invest. Also, we will increase investment, but not at the same rate as the sales growth.
Marc Hesselink
analystGot it. And can we also look at the [indiscernible], did you start investing again in R&D given the payback of that?
Françoise Chombar
executiveI'm not sure I understand your question.
Marc Hesselink
analystNo, I think in the last 2 years, the absolute margin spent on R&D has been relatively flattish. After -- before that, a period of increasing the R&D cost a bit. And as I remember, in previous calls, you said, okay, we first want to now leverage on that -- on what we already have before investing more again. Has that changed now?
Karen Van Griensven
executiveNo, that's indeed the aim. So we will -- I mean we will invest still. I mean there are many opportunities still in the market. So we continue to invest where we see it today, yes, opportunistic -- I mean good opportunity to do. On the other hand, there is still a lot of efficiency that we can improve in our development, in our way of working. So these 2 go combined hand-in-hand.
Operator
operatorAnd the final question in the queue is coming from the line of Robert Sanders from Deutsche Bank.
Robert Sanders
analystI'll keep it quick. Just first question would be Allegro last night talked about their xEV business being higher margin than their internal combustion engine business. And that's interesting to me because the opposite would be true at STMicro, for example. So how does the mix shift to xEV affect your gross margin as you look further out? And I have a couple of follow-ups.
Françoise Chombar
executiveI don't think there is a big difference, and that is because we make choices based on the business case, not necessarily related to EV or versus ICE. In the choices we make, of course, we choose for the future of mobility and that is definitely electrification in general. But now to say that EV has higher margin, okay, that's good for Allegro maybe. But we try to -- we have a certain -- we strive for a good EBIT margin on all the differences -- on all the businesses, sorry -- on all the businesses that we take, and there's a lot of elements that influence those choices. So for us, it's more a choice of sustainable -- a combination of good sustainability of the product, its uniqueness in solving customer problems. And of course, margin is always a concern. And if a product does not give sufficient hopes, let's say, because it's always a forecast, hopes for good margins, then we might just simply stop investing in that family of products. And we do. So we've made some choices in the past, yes, all along, in fact, in the past few years as well, where we started maybe an investment into a product and then while doing the first steps, you see, well, it's maybe -- it does not fulfill the promises that we had thought it should fulfill in the beginning, and we just stop it. And there are others where you start and you see that it gets better along the way. So I wouldn't say there is any difference between EVs or ICEs. It's about the product and about the solution it gives to the customer.
Robert Sanders
analystGot it. Just last question would just be -- I think the Wall Street Journal was reporting that General Motors is asking semicos to hold 12 months of inventory. But a lot of companies, I speak to, say that's not possible because of quality and change issues. And I think you've mentioned obsolescence. So is there any kind of realism to the idea that there could be a structural change in the amount of inventory that semicos could hold? And what would that do to pricing?
Françoise Chombar
executiveWell, I think not particularly GM, but I think overall, OEMs would love that, of course, as long as they don't have to pay for it. So I think it's -- it would be welcome, and we have such good conversations with some of our customers that also understand the bullwhip effect, that also understand, for example, how ERP systems, which are mostly pool systems, how they react and how they, in fact, exacerbate that huge up and -- those huge up and downs in supply chains. Luckily, we have a couple of customers who understand it the same way as we do. And then it's about getting into the conversation on, indeed, like you say, what are the changes ahead? Are there any changes ahead? What is the obsolescence risk? And in some cases, it's good to reserve capacity, whereas you don't know necessarily which type of products you will start. In some other cases, it might be welcome. There might be -- may be a shortage of, I don't know, lead frames, substrates or whatever, and then you give your order ahead, but don't necessarily increase your inventory. I mean there are many ways in which you can steer your supply chain, your ability to deliver faster. There are many, many ways in which you can do that. And when you ask customers, most of the customers, if you would ask the question, what is more important to you, availability of products or reliability of delivery? They would choose the latter. And in order to get there, you don't necessarily need to have 12 months on stock. You have to understand, in the first place, how the supply chain -- how your supply chain functions, what are the drivers and the restraints in your chain and then have those conversations in good agreements. And I would welcome a better understanding of this across the automotive supply chain because it will never go away. It -- the investments in semiconductors, in semiconductor wafer fabs, in technology, in designs. It just keeps growing -- the costs keep growing. So you -- there is always the balance to be sought between security and costs. And I think if you can have that discussion on a conversation with your customers, then you're on a good track. And luckily, we are with some of our customers because we can show also and demonstrate also that it works if you do that.
Operator
operatorAnd that was the final question in the queue. I will now hand you over to your host to conclude today's conference.
Françoise Chombar
executiveThank you for your valued questions and for your interest in Melexis. Our next earnings conference is scheduled on April 28, and I'd like to also point at the Annual Shareholders' Meeting to be held on May 11. And I would be delighted to welcome you to our online analyst meeting now scheduled on June 1, where you will be able to also meet with my successor, Marc Biron, and where we will update you on our strategy going forward. See you then. And meanwhile, please do keep safe and stay healthy. Bye-bye.
Operator
operatorThank you, everyone, for joining us on today's call. You may now disconnect your handsets.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Melexis NV transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Melexis NV earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.