Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 18, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorWelcome to the Global conference call of Daimler. At our customer's request, this conference will be recorded. The replay of the conference call will also be available as an on-demand audio webcast in the Investor Relations section of the Daimler website. The short introduction will be directly followed by a Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] I would like to remind you that this teleconference is governed by the safe harbor wording that you find in our published results documents. Please note that our presentations contain forward-looking statements that reflect management's current views with respect to future events. Such statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties. If the assumptions underlying any of these statements prove incorrect, then actual results may be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only to the date on which they are made. May I now hand over to Steffen Hoffmann, Head of Daimler Investor Relations. Thank you very much.
Steffen Hoffmann
executiveGood morning, ladies and gentlemen. This is Steffen Hoffmann speaking. On behalf of Daimler, I'd like to welcome you on both the telephone and the Internet to our Q4 and full year results conference call. We are very happy to have with us today Ola Källenius, our CEO; Martin Daum, Board member for Daimler Trucks & Buses; and Harald Wilhelm, our CFO. You probably all joined our presentation right before. Just as a quick reminder, in advance to our upcoming Q&A session, the respective presentation with all 2020 figures and the outlook for 2021 can be found on the Daimler IR website. Ladies and gentlemen, you may ask your questions now. [Operator Instructions] Now before we start, the operator will again explain the procedure.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Tim Rokossa, Deutsche Bank.
Tim Rokossa
analystThat would be Tim from Deutsche Bank. I have 2, please. The first one is, Ola, after the industry has collectively talked down for a while, it now really seems that 2021 is the year where OEMs are all trying to outrun each other on the way to be 100% electrified. You also indicated in the Handelsblatt interview overnight that you could see increased EV targets for you guys from the sort of 50% level that we know by the end of this decade. Could you envision to also be at 100% electrified by 2030 or would you rule that out? And also related to that, how confident are you that there are enough cells that you have secured on a way to be above the so-far announced 50% target? And then perhaps, I mean, this is addressing Ola and Harald, obviously, but perhaps Harald, it's for you rather. You say that people have to stay disciplined. And historically, whenever the market bounced back and your numbers did become better, Daimler had this problem that they always found a way to spend the money they made. Can you explain us how you assure that people will indeed remain more disciplined now that your numbers are looking as good as they do?
Ola Kallenius
executiveOkay. Tim. Yes, there is no doubt that the momentum for electrification is picking up, both on the battery electric vehicle side as well as on the plug-in hybrid side. But we have a very heterogeneous picture around the world. And what are the factors that will decide what type of adoption rate that we will see in 2030? Well, one is one that we can control ourselves, it's our products. And the product pipeline is very attractive and we have some big plans, to say the least, for these next 5 to 10 years. But we also have regulation. We have infrastructure. I think that's going to be crucially important how quickly we, as a society, can build up infrastructure, not just across Europe, which seems to take a lead now, but really across the world. So many things need to come together here. We are going to put ourselves in a position with our electric-first strategy that we can be on the forefront of that movement. I think it's too early to definitively say what the market is going to look like in 2030. But it's our job to put ourselves in a position to address that market. You know we're in a ramp-up of many new battery electric vehicles, the plug-in hybrids with 100 kilometers range on a WLTP side. They are, in some markets, really selling like hotcakes. And also not to forget the whole combustion lineup from Mercedes is brand new and it's fully electrified with mild hybrids. I don't think there's any manufacturer that is as deep in terms of that basis right now, which is still the major market for the next years. So we will be ready, but I think it's a tad too early to say exactly what 2030 is going to look like because of those other factors.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveAnd Tim, on your second question, well, I mean, what did we do in 2020 and why do we believe we can keep that discipline moving forward beyond just meeting 2020 numbers as you could see? I would highlight 3 issues. Number one, we defined in 2020 the midterm targets, where we're going to go on cost, cash and investment side. We talked about them on October 6 and they are carved in stone, which means that people know exactly what they have to achieve by 2020, '21, '22, '23, '24 and '25. We will not change these targets as a function of the markets moving a bit more favorably. That is fundamental, and I think that got the -- I mean has been well understood among the teams. Second key point, the performance management, I would say, maybe we were a bit more budget oriented or I mean work against the plan. Obviously, we do that. But deliver year-on-year improvement is coming on the top of the agenda. And the third point I would say as well is on cash flow focus. There's a budget focus, and what do I mean by it? From a cultural standpoint, it means would you spend the money privately as you do in business? So always bear that in mind. The target, therefore, is not to consume the budget, but whether you're doing something good for the company. And these 3 key elements, I do see, are gaining traction throughout the company. That's why we'll keep going with the momentum we injected in 2020.
Tim Rokossa
analystOkay. Great. If I just follow up on the first answer, Ola. I appreciate that you don't want to give us a proper number now. But is it then fair to assume that you would have a material flexibility should demand really surprise as much to the upside as it does right now? And I can only confirm your PHEV comment. I tried to order the GLE plug-in, and the waiting time is too long for us to really get this as a corporate car. So very much demand seems to be quite strong.
Ola Kallenius
executiveYes. The SUVs, in particular, are literally sold out. And of course, we're looking at what can we do. I mean the Tuscaloosa factory is running at capacity, but we're looking at what we can do there, and I shall try to get that car to you as quickly as possible. But you mentioned the supply chain. And of course, we're looking at the supply chain and how we can give ourselves the necessary flexibility to tackle scenarios that might be above what we have been thinking in the past. So we're certainly looking into that.
Tim Rokossa
analystOkay. Good to see that you put down the 10% at the high end of the corridor, by the way.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Patrick Hummel, UBS.
Patrick Hummel
analystAnd just following up on Tim's point about the battery sourcing. If you maybe have a couple of senses on that as well because it seems increasingly tight and that sounds like it could become an issue if the EV demand curve remains very steep. But coming to my questions, two, please. First one, you seem to be very confident and much more confident than many others right now on the impact of the chip shortage or your ability to catch up the lost volume later in the year. Other OEMs are also talking about the shortage to continue in Q2, and you seem to be optimistic that Q2 will already look better. So I'm just trying to better understand where you take that confidence from? What type of conversations you have with your suppliers? And also, if you can help us understand how that shortage will affect your mix in the near term? Are your flagship products, such as the new S-Class, going to be fine? Can you hold on to the EV production volumes? Are these unaffected by the chip shortage? And my second question relates to software. You had the -- also when you announced the spin, you emphasized the importance of software and we see a lot of movement there happening. There are tech companies or auto companies with a tech angle getting massive valuations that are certainly related to software. And there are speculations about Apple entering the market. How can a company like Daimler that after all is still a relatively small carmaker with 2 million units that puts luxury and quality of margins over volume, how can you make sure you stay competitive without spending a fortune on software? And it really seems to be essential to you to win there and it's part of your core strategy. And I know you have that collaboration with NVIDIA, but I'm still trying to get my head around how you can manage that as a relatively small car company?
Ola Kallenius
executiveMaybe just first, one more side note because you asked about the battery. I think there's no question that the whole supply chain, from the raw materials all the way up to the battery systems, is something that is going to require massive, massive investment in production capacity across the whole chain in these next 10 to 20 years. So depending on how that demand situation develops, of course, there can be temporary shortages there. We are working with our suppliers to mitigate that as best we can. But I think this is something that the whole car industry is facing or whole of society and all industries in a way. But let's get to the chip situation. As I mentioned in the presentation, it is a volatile and day-to-day management type of situation where you cannot make a 100% firm prediction as we sit here today. The information that we have from our suppliers now allow us to make up for the shortage that we are expecting in the first quarter during the rest of the year. So that's what we're basing our plan on. I don't know what I don't know. Should there be a material shift in their position vis-à-vis us, we will be flexible to react. But we can only use the information that we have at hand. And in this -- at this moment, we have put together a plan to make the first quarter minus into to an equilibrium by the end of the year. But we're watching this, and it's day-to-day management. How have we dealt with this inside the company? If you watched closely on the plants that we idled in January and also idled partly in February, we tried to as best we can move the shortage to the lower end of our portfolio. So as best we can, we have protected our SUV production like the GLE and the GLS. We have protected our S-class production, and we have been largely successful doing so. Not on every single individual part can you do that, but largely we have done it. And this, of course, also includes the xEVs, which have a very high priority for us. I think one thing is interesting when I get this software question is that I never hear anybody asking that question to any one start-up that enters into the car industry and has practically the same strategy that we have, that you want to be at the center of the architecture and the brain of your vehicle and that you certainly want to keep the customer interface in your ecosystem. So anybody that starts new never gets that question. But if you have been in the business for 135 years, you do get the question. And we are committed to being the architect of that operating system and of that software architecture. We're also committed to keeping the customer and the data that the customer generates in our ecosystem and make sure that we take care of the customer. We are not going to do everything ourselves, even though in the last 4 or 5 years have massively ramped up our staff in this area with digital hubs around the world from Berlin via Bangalore to Beijing to Seattle and Tel Aviv and what have you. We have, in the meantime, a relatively big team. We are also going to work with others. One of the prominent strategic partnerships is, of course, the one that we announced in the summer of last year with NVIDIA in the domain of driving assistance and autonomous drive. But behind the scenes, for the infrastructure layer, also the middle ware software, we are working with partners. But we are the director of the orchestra.
Operator
operatorOur next question is from Horst Schneider, Bank of America. And we will go on with José Asumendi, JPMorgan.
Jose Asumendi
analystJosé, JPMorgan. A few questions, please. Ola, can you comment a little bit more, please, around the cadence of your EV launches in 2021? You mentioned -- I'm pleased both across cars and vans, if possible. I was very interested by those in van EV launches. And also if you could comment a little bit around the -- your strategy around the vertical integration you want to have within the electric car with regards to electric motor or cell manufacturing. Has anything changed since we discussed this theme last year? Second question, please, Martin, on Trucks. Very, I think, interesting margin targets for the year. Can you help us a little bit understand what has been done in terms of restructuring in 2020? What are you looking to do in 2021? And then, please, any details around the electric truck launch, whether you can give us any guidance around when you plan to launch the truck? Which regions are you prioritizing, et cetera?
Ola Kallenius
executiveWith regard to EV launches, if I start on the car side, the car side has 4 launches this year. We started with the EQA. So compact city SUV, which is actually coming into the market this month of February. So we did the world premier and more or less the market introduction at the same time, which is unusual. And we will show the EQS in -- at the beginning of the second quarter, and it will come into the market in the summer. That will be followed by the EQB in the fall, and we will finish off the year with the smaller brother of the EQS, the EQE. And that we will show at the Frankfurt -- no, Munich auto show this year. So that's quite a busy year. But we shouldn't forget that the new C-Class, which we're presenting to the world next week and will come into the market in the early summer, that new C-Class will also, in its segment, have a plug-in hybrid with around 100 kilometers WLTP range. So we think that is ideally positioned for what's happening not only in Europe, in particular, in Europe, but in other places as well. On the van side, we now have the large van and the midsized segment covered with the eSprinter and with eVito and the EQV, which we entered into the market in the second half of 2020 and kind of coming into its own in 2021. The new Citan, and that will be a fantastic entry van position, will be presented this year. And the electric version -- the fully electric version of the new Citan is coming about 12 months after the market launch of the combustion-based one. And then we have a full electrification of the van division. But as I mentioned in my presentation, already in a couple of years, it comes the next generation and we have already started the concept engineering of the third-generation. I believe strongly that the van segment in some parts of the van market could see electrification perhaps even quicker than passenger cars. So that's an exciting space. With regard to vertical integration. We are fully vertically integrated on the R&D side and we have deepened those activities in the last 12, 18 months. We have also struck some strategic cooperation agreements on the R&D side with some of our supply partners, so we are basically co-inventing what the future is going to look like on the electric side. And we are in the process of now doing the serious engineering and preparing the industrialization of our own e-axles as well. So we have taken a step there. But we're very carefully watching the economics of this thing. It's not like it's a dogmatic religion here, what you do in-house and what you do outside. You look at the financial situation in every one situation. But in terms of knowing, controlling the technology and developing the technology, there we want to be in the driver seat.
Martin Daum
executiveOkay, José. And the question about restructuring. Restructuring here was there was not that one golden bullet, that one big mistake. So if you just close that, everything is fine. This is a million things, or let's say, a thousand individual initiatives that all started at the Capital Market Day in 2019 when we promised on fixed cost and variable cost and market positioning. And we translated that in actions and those actions got traction, and especially in Europe. So there are -- we are well underway what we promised. We will continue. We'll see full year impacts. We have to do -- we have to make some of the gains we did in the second half of this year, sometimes supported by COVID to make permanent and just not a onetime event. But we have a good tracking system in place. We have a transformation office established that track that and keep the organization honest. We have shown in the second half that we can keep our cost level even with higher volumes. And so I'm pretty positive that we can run that momentum into 2021. And that is not just Mercedes Trucks in Europe. That is on the bus side. For example, I told you the difficult situation on the coach bus, but yet bus delivered last year a positive result despite those really huge impacts on the production side on a very big pillar of that business. So I would say the fighting spirit is really high in the organization all around the world. And so I'm really confident for 2021. When it goes to electric truck launches. The biggest launch or the most significant launch is certainly the eActros in the second half in 2021 when we go to serious production with this product. That means no prototype, no single handmade trucks, but trucks rolling down the line in our factory in Wörth for the markets on the electric Actros. Parallel, we ramp up significantly our electric school bus production in the United States. We come with more variants with higher volumes on the bus side, city bus side. In Europe, there are many cities around Europe, not just Germany, have decided to make Mercedes eCitaro their majority brand and product for their urban transportation. And you can continue with Asia. We continue what we do with the medium-duty truck in the United States. You can continue what we are doing on the refuse side with the Econic. And you see trucks always goes down in small batches, focused applications, and we'll provide with our customers here a huge host of product in 2021.
Operator
operatorAnd the next question is from Horst Schneider, Bank of America.
Horst Schneider
analystIt's Horst here. I have got 2, please. The first one is on Slide 11 in your presentation, where you talked about this 4% head count reduction, and 14% fixed cost reduction in 2020. I want to get a feeling in which direction we are heading in 2021 on these items. Especially regarding the head count reduction, I don't know if you can quantify. What is more to come, not just in '21, but more in general, because you started several initiatives. And on the fixed cost reduction, I remember, you targeted 20% reduction by 2025. We are now at 14% already. So does that mean there is not any more a lot to come or we see first reversal in '21 and thereafter the more significant step down? Forgive me, that was already more than one question. But on Trucks, the last question I have, that is on -- to Martin Daum, if you see here the need for any potential structural change because you have got this FUSO business, you do more emerging markets. We know from Volvo that they, for example, disposed the UD Truck brand. Wouldn't that be also an option for you?
Ola Kallenius
executiveSo should I do head count maybe, and I'll leave the fixed cost for you.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveYou want to address the head count.
Ola Kallenius
executiveHorst, as you know, the bulk of our personnel is in Germany. In Germany, we have 2 main methods of addressing the head count. It's not replacing fluctuation and it's also offering severance packages. We started that in the summer of 2020, and we're continuing through this year. So that is a gradual process. That is why on the head count target, we set ourselves a longer target, kind of a midpoint in 2022 at the end and then also for 2025 as a part of the strategy presentation that we gave to you in the fall. So we're more or less staying on that trajectory. One thing though I wanted to mention is, in one area, we have made a conscious decision to increase vertical integration and that's in software. So the software side sits outside of this, and we are aggressively hiring software engineers. From a financial point of view, though, that may actually even be better than buying it from suppliers. So there's not an adverse financial impact from that.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveWell, Horst, if I take the remainder of the Page 11, in terms of the KPIs over there. Well, I would say, overview in fixed cost in 2021 should be at about the same level in 2020. Now you might call that a bit lazy. No, it's not as 2020 had the benefit of short-term working. All in all, short-term working in all categories had a EUR 500 million impact that Mercedes-Benz made in 2020. And that means that -- I mean, this is what we lose in '21 and we have to replenish by more underlying measures. So it's not a walk in the park, but we're committed on that. On the R&D side, we'll see a bit of a pickup of investment in software, MBUX, NVIDIA Corporation. And on the investment side, we will be at about, I mean, the same level. I said it in the presentation, I repeat it: we were committed to the 2025 targets. Also answered, I mean, as part of Tim's question what is the culture when we fix these targets. So they are signed to mean to the people. They can optimize. They can orientate, I mean, their activity, their portfolio of activity and their respective cost structures accordingly. If we can do faster, if we can go faster, we'll try. But that's our commitment.
Martin Daum
executiveAnd Horst, to your question about potential restructuring. No plans. I can't comment Volvo. I like the information, I don't know what their motivation was. I don't know the situation of their business. But they know our business. And our business in Asia is profitable. Our business in Asia is on a really good path to be a benchmark business for that region. This region -- and it's not just Japan. I mentioned Indonesia, one, the second largest truck market outside -- if you add China, the third largest. China, United States, Indonesia, a good market. And we have a 50% share in that market. We have a good, healthy, profitable business there, a business that generates cash. And I would say, the near focus on return on sales is the wrong one. The real focus is the absolute profit, the absolute cash flow a business generates and the amount of investment it would need. And in all categories, our Asian business is in a really great and very good track. And it's a very, very good supplement to our overall portfolio.
Horst Schneider
analystOkay. That's great. Just quickly, the order of profitability is still U.S. or North America then Europe and then Asia, right? Asia is the least profitable part of the truck business. Is that right?
Martin Daum
executiveYes. But profitable. Least profitable looks always bad. These -- our bus business is a 6% business in normal years and it's a benchmark in the entire world. It's definitely less profitable than North America, but it is profitable and it generates a healthy cash flow.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Arndt Ellinghorst, Bernstein.
Arndt Ellinghorst
analystIt's Arndt from Bernstein. Ola, a quick question on your view how the premium EV market should shape out over the next 5 years or so. Obviously, we have this situation completely unprecedented where brands are coming to the market fully loaded up with equity at most. The list of brands doesn't have -- this doesn't end. And also the recent pricing action that Tesla has taken in key markets. So all the companies are coming into the market with this product. The valuation is designed for growth, growth, growth. They're not expected to make money. What's happening to this market really? Will we see endless price cuts? Will we see an avalanche of high-end EV product? And then how will traditional OEMs compete in that market? I think it's the multibillion-dollar question also on your multiple. So how is that market-shaping out for you?
Ola Kallenius
executiveOne thing is for sure, product-driven and launch-driven. And as you know, on our new large luxury vehicle-dedicated electric platform, we're going to launch at least 4 vehicles on that in the next 24 months or so. So part of the momentum that we will see in the market will come from product momentum. And that will come from traditional car companies as well as new entrants or new entrants that are already in the market. So I agree with you that the competitive intensity is going to be high. I think when the customer ultimately makes his or her choice, that they will look at the complete package and not just a couple of the dimensions when they buy one of these vehicles. I drive the EQS as a prototype quite a bit. And the one thing I love with it next to its smooth power delivery, good range and all those things that if you think about, first, when you think about an electric car is that it's a real Mercedes. It's really what you expect when you want a real Mercedes. So on our end, where we want to take that luxury piece and protect our turf, I think we have the ingredients to do so. And I don't believe that discounting yourself into a volume situation is the right way to go here. So we will certainly try to protect our brand equity in that market. But I agree, one has to look at a situation where competitive intensity is probably increasing.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from George Galliers, Goldman Sachs.
George Galliers-Pratt
analystSo the first question I had was just on the cash flow. You guided for the adjusted cash flow before interest and tax for the industrial business to be at the prior year level, which I believe was around EUR 10.4 billion. Could you give us any indication of your expectations for cash taxes this year as well as interest expense and the other reconciliating items? And also, you received EUR 1.7 billion of dividends, I believe, from BBAC in 2020 what is your expectation for this year included within your cash flow guidance? And then the second question, maybe somewhat following on from Arndt was whether you could provide us 3 reassurances around the EQS? Obviously, it's going to be the pinnacle of your EV range. And with that in mind, I was wondering if you could reassure us that, firstly, when we benchmark it against the Model S and BMW's flagship, will the EQS have the same leadership as we've been used to for the S-Class in its segment? Secondly, one of your competitors has introduced the class-leading battery electric vehicle in the compact segment. But commentators have observed that the material quality is maybe not at the same level as the comparable [indiscernible]. When we benchmark the EQS against the S-Class, will there be any discernible difference in material quality? And then, finally, given the product's technical prowess and your premium brand positioning, do you expect variable margins on the EQS to be comparable to S-Class or at least above the Mercedes average.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveWell, let's take them one by one, but in the interest of time, maybe we will go a bit quick. So yes, let me emphasize again, cash flow before interest and tax will be at about same level as 2020 with the cash conversion targets slightly below 1 whereas 2020 was definitely in excess. What does it mean actually? 2020, we had the tailwind from the working capital. And in 2021, basically, this tailwind from the working capital, which might turn a bit into a headwind due to the ramp-up of the volume, we will compensate by underlying performance, i.e., EBIT improvement. So that makes basically the CFBIT bit on the industrial side to be at the same level in '21 as in 2020, and I think the numbers you quoted are, I mean, actually, okay. On the tech side, I will not give a specific cash tax guidance. EUR 800 million on the industrial side in 2020, obviously, is a rather low number. We would need to go really into country by country and the situation on tax loss carryforwards. I think you should assume something which is closer to the normalized tax rate of 28% to 30%, but not maybe exactly at that level. And on the BBAC dividend, I would assume the dividend to be at about the same level as the equity result for 2021.
Ola Kallenius
executiveNow if we talk technology with the EQS. If we start with the segment and its size, there will not be sedan, a luxury sedan, in the market at the same time nor is there a luxury sedan in the market right now that compares to the size and the packaging in the space of the EQS. So it sits a segment above what you can get in the market right now from that point of view, including a backseat where you can actually sit comfortably. And I've been through in a wide range of electric vehicles in all segments and hardly found one that I enjoy in the back. You will be able to enjoy the EQS in the back and you will also get a reclining seat, similar to what you're used to in the S-Class. And in spite of it being bigger, having more features, it will still have a range of WLTP above 700 kilometers. So that speaks quite a bit about the efficiency of the powertrain that is going into this vehicle. And once you're in that range, the whole range thing starts becoming a little bit less important. You have fast-charging, DC charging, the whole 9 yards. If you then step into the car and it will look completely different than an S-Class, it was not our goal to make clone of a car that is based, in this case, upon a combustion platform, but to do something that looks fully and totally different. We have shown the Hyperscreen at the CES -- at the digital CES. Once you sit in the car and you play with it, it really blows your mind. It is a piece of art, but it's a piece of high-tech art. So once you're in the car, you don't get the feeling that it is a class below. You get a feeling, wow, this is something I've never seen before. And of course, a Mercedes will have the materials that matches the brand promise. If I step to the other end of the portfolio, take a ride in the EQA: smooth, quiet in that compact SUV segment. I'm looking at the car sitting right next to me here in the room. It's beautiful, the interior quality, everything is spot on. So that is a real entry Mercedes, but it also feels like it is, in terms of its quality promise, kind of a step above most other competitors. So just because we're going electric, doesn't mean that we forget that we are Mercedes, and we will stick to that. Margins. We don't comment on individual margin targets for any car. But if we talk about logic, it's logical that the contribution margins on an EQS are perhaps higher than the contribution margins on an EQA, as is the case with the S-Class and the GLA.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Harald Hendrikse, Morgan Stanley.
Harald Hendrikse
analystCan you hear me okay?
Steffen Hoffmann
executiveYes.
Harald Hendrikse
analystHello?
Steffen Hoffmann
executiveYes, yes.
Harald Hendrikse
analystPerfect, sorry. So 3 related questions. Sorry, back to my usual subject really, BEV, PHEV. You've got lots of BEVs coming through. You haven't maybe, as much as other people communicated, volume targets or what your overall EV as opposed to xEV target might be and obviously when that's the priority for most investors. Can you talk a little bit more about that? Or simply the other way around, if you have very high demand for the EQS, will you happily sell as many as you can sell? And then 2 related questions to that. Just a little bit on the investment chat this morning. You've done an amazing job cutting investments as we had hoped you would do in 2020. Can you really maintain this much lower level of CapEx and R&D going forward? And obviously, I've seen R&D is going to go up a little bit. But can we maintain that much lower level relative to where we have been for the last couple of years, i.e., is there enough ICE investment to be able to cut relative to what you said was ramping up, obviously, things like software, technology spending and stuff like that. And then last question, same question, exactly the same. On EV, again, as you've restructured the ICE business and made it much more profitable than where it has been, can you continue to do that as the EV dilution accelerates now over the next 3 or 4 years? Have you got enough in the bag to be able to fully offset what will obviously still be continued dilution?
Ola Kallenius
executiveI'll do the first one, and I'll let Harald handle the second 2 questions. When we designed our EV strategy on the production side, we have set it up for maximum flexibility. So in the assembly plants themselves, they're actually built in the same assembly plant. So the brand-new Factory 56 that we opened in Sindelfingen, the most modern factory in the world, builds both the S-Class and the EQS. So we can flex between those two. Of course, we have made assumptions on volumes that we're making for this. So there is not endless flexibility. But we have a very decent flexibility there and we'll be able to go with the market. For the overall journey in the next 5 to 10 years, we had said as -- in our strategy, kind of as a rule of thumb, minimum 25% xEV as part of total sales in 2025 and above 50% xEV in 2030. But also here, flexibility is the name of the game. You know that our new architectures, electric-first architectures, should market dynamics switch in a direction where that number goes up, we'll be able to react to that.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveWell, then on investments, well, we talked about that last year. We set ourselves an objective of more than 20% down compared to 19%. I mean is it possible? Yes, it is possible. Why? If you look on the investment or more on the industrial side of things, we're really, I mean, taking more out of the existing capacities. You saw we divested some, we're streamlining. That existing capacity is good even for more volume than what we guide in '21 and beyond. So we don't see the need for additional industrial capacity investment. At the same time, the vertical integration changes, as you know, with the move over from the combustion engine to the electric propulsion with a lower level of vertical integration, and therefore, lower level of investment and a lower level of complexity, variants and so forth. At the same time, also on the R&D side, a very large share of the R&D today still goes into the next maybe last generation ICE engines. And as we move forward, that switches over into more investment on the electric drivetrain on the software. However, we said that the adjustment will be harder on the investment, i.e., on the CapEx than on the R&D, and that's exactly what you see in the pattern of 2020. On the cost improvement, well, we will keep going. The targets have been sized in a way that we can accommodate from the mix of ICE and BEV, the margin aspirations are as we set out. Well, 2020, I think, demonstrates that it can work. The guidance 2021, if you decompose it, basically shows you as well, it can work. I really would like to emphasize that the ICE cars are cash machines. Cash machines will build the bridge into a BEV future. And at the same time, we add tech, obviously also the variable cost of the BEV vehicles. We'll take them down to bring the margin up. And the aspiration certainly is that this margin should marry up with ICE margin at a point in time in the future. But there is a very important element in it, which is the mix in the BEV as well. A BEV at the low end is not the same as a BEV at the high end. I think Ola alluded to them when he talked about the EQS margin moving forward. So all in all, yes, it can work.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Stephen Reitman, Societe Generale.
Stephen Reitman
analystStephen Reitman, Societe Generale in London. I have a question. First of all, about PHEVs in the mix [indiscernible] about 92% in Germany in 2020. Where do you think that [indiscernible] 2020? And also, do you think the pricing of PHEVs [indiscernible] plug-in hybrid [indiscernible] diesel version less than [ EUR 3,000 ] equipment in vehicle particularly the size of the battery [indiscernible] related to PHEV [indiscernible] is then you put [indiscernible] It looks like a tremendous bargain for business buyer, private buyers as well. Given the high demand [indiscernible] PHEVs relative [indiscernible] my question about the extension of useful life [indiscernible]
Steffen Hoffmann
executiveStephen, sorry to interrupt. This is Steffen. The connection -- the line is very, very bad. Let's try -- we understood the question on PHEV mix and we understood the question on useful life. Let us try to answer those because connection is extremely bad. Sorry for that interruption. So...
Ola Kallenius
executiveSo I start. Even though it was a little bit interrupted, I'm going to try to interpret what you said, Stephen, about PHEVs. One thing I did understand that you said they were priced too low. I'm going to pass that on to marketing and sales immediately after this call. And no, I think we price according to competitiveness. And yes, we have a very high demand. And if there is more room in terms of pricing, we always explore that within reason and try to protect our good price premiums. It is true that in some markets due to incentivization, government incentivization, it becomes very attractive to get a PHEV, and Germany is one of those markets. But that's not the only thing that is driving demand. What's also driving demand is the new generation of PHEVs with up to 100 kilometers WLTP range. It really becomes a sensible option where you literally, from Monday through Friday, you can drive emission free, but you still have the combustion engine to give you any freedom or flexibility that you need. So this segment will be relevant for many years to come, not only in Europe, but in particular, in Europe. In terms of the life of these vehicles and the life of battery electric vehicles, in general, since we put the first ones out there with smart, this was more than 10 years ago, it's almost 15 years ago now, I think everybody has been perhaps a little bit positively surprised how well these cars are aging. So I think useful life up until this point has not been a concern for the consumer.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveWell, on the extension of the useful life, well, over 2020, we reviewed jointly with operations, yes, the useful life of our equipment and tools. And as an effort, to extend useful life, we could conclude that, therefore, the amortization periods today are too short, and therefore, also according to IFRS, we have to adopt. What I really like to emphasize, this is not accounting for the purpose of boosting EBIT in 2021. this is really the underlying economic, i.e., extend the use of these tools and the equipment. And therefore, remain over time, it will also favor cash, obviously, in terms of lower level of invest, i.e. CapEx. And the impact at the group level is EUR 800 million in 2021. The lion's share falls in cars and vans and there will also be a bit of an impact in 2022.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Dorothee Cresswell, Exane.
Hanna Dorothee Cresswell
analystIt's Dorothee Cresswell from Exane. I have 2, if I may. The first is a little more strategic. Once Mercedes is separated from the Trucks, do you think we could see an investor coming in and taking a stick in that than more focused on both entities? I'm really thinking about a player from the tech side. And is that something that you might actively seek out to strengthen your position in the software race of the coming years? And then my second question is just around pricing. The environment is clearly very strong at the moment. Can you give us some idea of how that varies between powertrains and segments? And then perhaps what's more important is do you think you're being sufficiently cautious on residual value guarantees in the internal combustion engine segment?
Ola Kallenius
executiveDorothee, on your first question, I do not want to speculate on what any one investor will do once we have these 2 stocks being traded. But Mercedes-Benz really is a company, which is a good combination between luxury and tech. So if an investor is looking for something with brand strength and the product to back up that brand promise married to high tech, there is potential in the Mercedes-Benz stock after that separation. But at this stage, there is nothing concrete that I would like to speculate about.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveWell, on the pricing side, well, there are 2 elements. The one is the strong product substance. And I think customers demand is high for that strong product substance. And therefore, it enjoys intrinsic pricing. Well, it happens. On the plug-in side, we will see how it will develop. I think in 2020, with a ramp-up, it was good. You could see that the dilution impact was definitely manageable. Does the price pay for the incremental cost of the vehicle? All in all, probably not yet, but we'll continue to work on that. In terms of residual values, I have to say I was very pleased to see the evolution of the residual values over 2020 also as a result of market steering, less push into the market, which was helpful for new vehicles, but in particular, on the used vehicles, and hence, on the residuals. I think that's the kind of conduct we want to continue in 2021 and moving forward. And therefore, I think, on the residuals, we are not exposed in the way we run it at this stage.
Operator
operatorAnd the last question is from Henning Cosman, HSBC.
Henning Cosman
analystIt's also related to the competitive intensity, but maybe I can make it more a little bit about regions. So you obviously had really strong market share gains in most regions in the falling market. Now when I look at your unit volume guidance, you're sort of suggesting you can hold on to some of these market share gains also in the recovery. So I was hoping you could maybe discuss a little bit how you see the volume development in the main regions, Europe, U.S. China. And specifically in China, if you could just maybe reassure us how you're feeling so comfortable about standing your ground when big tech competitors, EV competitors want to add 200,000 unit capacity and sales in China in 2021, which are obviously coming at a price point that's typically more your hunting ground. So if we could just maybe discuss it again from the regional angle. And then my second question, maybe -- I don't know if you can comment on that, but if you could just sort of discuss maybe a little bit what the trajectory of margin could look like? Can you give us some comfort that we're now already at the sort of elevated level and there's no real reason to expect a big drop before it gets better again towards your stated 2025 targets? Or are there such things like, for example, the useful life benefit wearing off and further dilution from accelerated EV where you would caution us to not now extrapolate on the high level?
Ola Kallenius
executiveIf we start with market development whereas we don't guide on kind of exact projections per region, I think it's fair to say that, in 2021, as the economy starts opening up again, the vaccine is being rolled out in a bigger way, we think there will be market momentum. Yes, we talked about the first quarter, in particular, being impacted by semiconductor. So there is an effect there. But in general, we see high demand for our products. And we're moving into a good spot in our product life cycle. We have a lot of new cars. We're adding a whole range of electric cars on top of the ones that we already had next to those 4 electric ones, not to forget the C-Class segment, which is our biggest segment, all fresh launching at the middle of this year. So there is a lot of product momentum. Of course, there is competitive intensity. Absolutely, no doubt. But we can also watch that some of the players, there are now also new players, they seem to be moving down market to seek volume and grab on the price-volume curve, more volume on the lower end of that price-volume curve and not so much on the higher end. And maybe anchoring the brand with a product on the higher end, but then going for volume down. So the battle is not a battle with premium luxury alone here. There will be a battle on the volume side of this equation. We started very well in China in the month of January. So we have market momentum. And we also believe that China, structurally and from an absolute volume point of view, has the highest potential also in the coming 10 years and not just the good 7, 8, 9 years that we have behind us. But there is more to come from the Chinese market.
Harald Wilhelm
executiveAnd on margin trajectory, let me give you the weather forecast update. Well, remind you, we said last year, in rainy, bad weather conditions, we want to be mid-single digit. I think we said 6% to 8%. In fair weather, half sunny, mid -- high single digit, 8% to 10%. And in sunshine, beyond double digit. Well, you could say 2020 with COVID with a bit more than 2 million units on passenger cars, maybe that is a rainy condition. And with 6.9%, I think it's spot on. 2021, we said we'll be sales up more than 7.5%. Well, when you make your math, just for the sake of the argument, if it would be 2.3 million units with an 8% to 10%, I would call that pretty much spot on as well. Let's not speculate about the full sun. But I think, definitely, we are on the right trajectory here. Now you could say, well, here you are in 2021. So what you're doing between now and 2025? We keep going with the targets, as we emphasized before, and we have to. Don't lean back. We know that there is some dilution to come from the step-up of the xEV portfolio. We could demonstrate, I think, in 2020 that we can master it. With the guidance for 2021, I think we can demonstrate it as well. But obviously, it will go to a higher level and that's why we need to keep going on the efforts on cost as well as on the cash side. But the trajectory remains absolutely valid.
Steffen Hoffmann
executiveLadies and gentlemen, thank you for your questions and for being with us today. Also thank you very much to the Daimler management team for answering those questions. Now Investor Relations remains at your disposal to answer any further questions you might have. To all of you listening in, have a great morning, great afternoon or a great evening, and we look forward to talking to you soon. Thanks, and goodbye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Mercedes-Benz Group AG transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Mercedes-Benz Group AG earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.