Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MIRM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 16, 2026

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Michael Ulz

analyst
#1

All right. Hello, everyone, and thanks for joining us at the Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference. I'm Mike Ulz, one of the biotech analysts here. It's my pleasure to introduce Chris Peetz, CEO from Mirum Pharmaceuticals. Just as a quick reminder, the format for today is a fireside chat, but if anyone in the audience has a question, you can raise your hand and we'll try and address it in our discussion here. But before we get started, I just need to read a quick disclosure. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. And if you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. And with that, Chris, -- thanks for sharing your time with us today, and maybe I'll just hand it over to you to make some introductory comments.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks for hosting. Great to be here. And I'll make a quick disclaimer on my end as well. be making forward-looking statements, so I refer you to the SEC filings for Mirum for a more complete risk factor disclosure. And a bit about Mirum, we are a company that's established just under 8 years ago and focused on pulling together high-impact medicines for rare disease that are often overlooked, missed by some of the bigger companies but really compelling opportunities, not only from patient impact, but also as a business model and pulling these together in an efficient way. This year, we're on track for $680 million to $700 million of revenue across 3 approved medicines really had a kind of emerging growth trend in one of our indications, in particular, with that I'm sure we'll spend some time talking about. And a pipeline that is very busy right now. So later this quarter, later this month, actually, expecting to announce top line data of the AZURE 1 Phase III study of brilovetug in hepatitis delta. We have a PDUFA date from one of our newly added programs in FOP more readouts, two more Phase IIIs reading out next quarter and another study in PBC, first quarter next year, all this on the back of entering into a regulatory conversation for PSC for volixibat as well. So it's a busy stretch for Mirum. And kind of on the other side of this, see a real inflection on business performance from all of these data readouts and launches that we expect in the near term, exciting time across the board.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#3

Yes. Great. Thanks for that introduction. Yes, lots to get through here. So maybe we just start with the commercial business and Live Marley and you touched on this in your prepared remarks, but you're seeing some nice sort of growth in PFIC. So maybe talk about what you're seeing there and how you think about that going forward?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#4

LIVMARLI is approved in 2 different indications, cholestatic pruritus due to allogelsyndrome and choosieritis due to PFIC. And first approval in Alagille syndrome continues to be a growth driver. So we, across the board, continue to see new patient starts the response profile for most patients is quite meaningful and see strong compliance and persistence as well. So that plays well for the brands over time, both this is U.S. as well as international performance. The PFIC indication was added subsequent to the Alagille syndrome launch -- and it's been an interesting story over time. Initially, we saw us as a pediatric opportunity. That's what our field team is primarily targeting and finding the pediatric profile of the PFIC patient -- as we've been in market with LIVMARLI in Puratos dudopetic, we've found that there is also a substantial underdiagnosed population in adults that actually have PFIC and have, to date, been labeled as idiopathic cholestasis. So really just an incomplete diagnosis in many of these adult cholestatic patients with pruritus. And that's something that we've seen start to contribute to the top line over the past year. Very durable trend in everything we're seeing. In fact, we're now in the process of expanding the field commercial team to help support some of that patient finding and diagnosis help build awareness of genetic testing and availability of it for adult patients. We estimate there's probably about 2,000 adult PFIC patients in the sale market that are out there in the U.S. So that's kind of one of the near-term drivers for the continued growth on the commercial business.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#5

Yes. As we look next year and beyond, you also have a Phase III EXPAND study ongoing that could even further expand the opportunity there. So maybe just talk a little bit about that, maybe give a little bit of background how you ended up sort of targeting that indication and what to expect when we see data I think in the fourth quarter.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#6

Yes. LIVMARLI as a whole, we see it as a $1 billion-plus brand opportunity driven by all these different components, expand being a substantial contributor to it as well. It is a basket study. So it's a collection of ultra-rare causes of cholestatic pruritus that by definition in our discussion with the FDA are too small to run a stand-alone study in. So good number of them in the study are biliary atresia. That's probably the only one that's a little bit more common of the mix and then very small numbers of other genetic and nongenetic causes of cholestasis that end up with a pure its presentation. Study looks at both pediatric and adult patients, the readout, the primary endpoint that we're expecting next quarter is in a pediatric cohort. That's what the study was primarily powered and designed around. So expect to see that as the top line next quarter, the pediatric patients with an identified subset looking at biliary atresia as well as a secondary because it is about half of the patient population. There's probably 500 pediatric patients in the U.S. that make up the addressable market that we've kind of identified in size. It's an early estimate. It's hard to tell how big of an indication this could be in adult settings as well. There are some adult patients out there, certainly, we just don't know quite how many. So it's a nice add-on to what we're already seeing in Algea syndrome and PFIC.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#7

Can you talk about what drives your confidence in being successful there? Any prior data you can put to.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#8

Yes. There's -- really, the justus of the study design came from physician interests in compassionate use case studies. So we do have not in a clinical trial format, but we do have anecdotal case study evidence seeing response in a number of these types of settings. Bill are atresia, in particular, we presented some of the case studies of a series of biliary tesa patients with cholestatic pruritus being treated. And it's what you'd expect for an iBAT treatment in a patient with cholestasis, elevated bile acids and itch, you can expect to see a nice response in the clinical data that comes out from those studies.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#9

Great. And if we just sort of stick with the commercial portfolio and specifically the bile acid portfolio, you added that a couple of years ago, and it seems to be performing well. So maybe just talk a little bit about that, what's driving that and the outlook there?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#10

The bile acids sitex and koldam have grown nicely with a dedicated team behind it. One of the things to note when we brought those products in, realization we had is that the prescriber universe is not entirely hepatology in GI -- many of these patients, in particular for Setexly and for some of the kbom indications are in medical genetics or neurology, and it's more of a patient-finding diagnosis effort that doesn't exclusively happen in hepatology. So we built a separate team that focuses on those other settings and the patient finding -- and they've done a fantastic job over time with these products. And it's about having a dedicated effort that is -- it's a different strategy than what the liver team is doing. So it makes sense to have a different team staffed against it. And actually, it fits really well with one of the things to come on FOP. That's the team that's going to be launching zolargesirtib in FOP. And it's a really similar effort, overlapping call points in terms of the institutions that these people are visiting and in contact with a similar effort in terms of following data on diagnosis and leveraging some of the referral patterns that happen for these ultra-rare conditions like FOP, like CTX.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#11

Yes. Maybe talk a little bit more about FOP and kind of what attracted you to that asset and kind of what drove that decision?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#12

Somewhat from kind of what I was just talking about with our expansion into medical genetics and kind of thinking of rare disease as a therapeutic area. We've been looking for other programs that could fit with that kind of team and call points to put more in the hands of the team that's been executing so well. As we've started looking into FOP and the programs being run there, the biology and the data are striking. So this program that Incyte did all the work on the Phase II study that supported the NDA submission, really compelling data that's come out of that showing that you can really versus placebo have a striking difference in the volume of ossification that build up over time for these patients. We see this as groundbreaking data for FOP patients to be able to halt that formation of new ossification dramatically change the course compared to placebo in those data sets. So both that clinical data and how clear it is as well as the fit with our team and business model comes together in a great story. And with the conversation with insight, it's a story of focus between 2 companies, right? This was something that didn't fit with their business model is clearly aligned with what we're trying to do. So it was a natural transition that we set up.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#13

Yes. Makes sense. With the PDUFA date coming up here, can you just talk about launch preparations? Can you hit the ground running sounds like you probably can, but maybe just talk a little bit about that.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#14

Yes. Even for launch preparations, field team, it's the same team that's already out there for the bile acid medicines. So in terms of the staffing, largely that's all in place. And so we're ready for the PDUFA date and decision in a couple of weeks here. Looking to -- that's the point that triggers a transition of sponsorship from Insight. So a couple of steps there to get this launched in Q4. .

Michael Ulz

analyst
#15

Okay. Great. as we've been sort of on the topic of BD, you've obviously been pretty active over the past few years. So maybe just talk more broadly about your BD strategy, your thoughts currently? Are you looking to add more programs? Or do you have enough catalysts over the next 6 months?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#16

We're a little busy for the next 6 months, when it takes time for these deals to come together -- which I think is -- I mean that's behind the overall strategy for how we got to where we are today. And the vision for the path forward is to always be active -- to find the opportunity that is compelling both from the biology data and patient impact, but then also that fits with the Mirum business model that you can have an intersection where the deal economics work for both sides. It takes time and being a little bit opportunistic. So we never rest on the BD front. We're always active looking at things -- the range of things that could be of interest remains the same. Phase II opportunities through to early commercial are all of interest and could fit well. But granted the next 6 months are a little packed -- so adding a Phase II sounds like a pretty good idea to me instead of another launch next year.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#17

Yes. Understood. And I guess what areas of focus? Is it like rare genetic liver? Could you go outside that at all? Or is that -- does it make sense for you or.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#18

Yes. We look outside of liver and outside of the broader current therapeutic areas where we're active because we see rare disease as therapeutic area as the expertise that we bring. So the ability to commercialize medicines where they are maybe harder to diagnose, harder to get to a point of care where there is maybe a first product in class or in the indication and kind of setting and changing the standard of care. These are the types of opportunities that our team has shown that they can execute on. And so it's not so much tied to the specialists but more the model around a rare disease product launch. And we're seeing, as we saw with the bile acid products how we're approaching the zolurgasertib launch, you can leverage this into new therapeutic areas pretty easily. So adding on the endocrine call point in some of these tertiary centers for the -- what we call the GM team is pretty straightforward, actually.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#19

Maybe we can keep it rolling moving to volixibat, and maybe just start with PSC and just maybe talk a little bit about the market opportunity there and the unmet need and how you see it.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#20

So backdrop of PSC as an indication, this is autoimmune-driven cholestatic condition presents most commonly in adults, but there is a pediatric onset form of it as well, and hallmark of it being the fibrotic strictures forming around the bile duct leading to progressive liver complications. It's also associated with frequent episodes of cholangitis, highly variable liver labs and just really a very difficult setting to treat clinically. And it's been very tough for drug developers historically. So we've seen a number of programs early on exploring different endpoints using histology, using different biomarkers. None of those have really panned out. When we approached it with volixibat -- we're coming at it with -- from a different angle. So leveraging some of what we learned on the pediatric side using the symptomatic burden as the endpoint for our registration program. And clear that pruritus is a substantial clinical burden for these patients that aligned well to be an endpoint in PSC similar to how we've used that in syndrome and PFIC and PBC. So a good precedent for how it's used in other settings. And with the Vistas program in PSC for volixibat, which I'm sure we'll talk about kind of diving into it here. I had that conversation with FDA, good clear written correspondence discussing the study design, the registrational intent pruritus as a substantial patient need end point and indication and had good alignment on the study design and announced earlier this year, really strong top line data. So clear had presented at EASL this year, a really compelling impact on pruritus in the VISTA study for volixibat in PSC.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#21

You also shared that positive data with the FDA and the FDA sort of requested Phase III. So maybe just walk us through what happened there? And what are your thoughts on that going forward from here?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#22

So working through the situation on the regulatory front now, it was a bit of a surprise for us. So after the positive readout -- we went for a pre-NDA meeting with FDA and had the surprise recommendation from them to conduct a Phase III study. A surprise for us in many ways because we had alignment on the study from the start as a pivotal study. In the conversation a lot of the different aspects of the program were discussed. All of them were present at the start of the program and were considered with the original study design. So we're a bit surprised by the reaction. Subsequent to that meeting, we were granted breakthrough designation. So we're using that as an ability to have a bit more access. And so over the balance of the year, planning to have interactions with the FDA through written submissions, sharing more of the Vistas data with them admittedly that we have not submitted full data sets to them yet. So I think there's a lot to be gained from getting them closer to some of the data sets that answer a lot of the questions on treatment in this patient population specifically and even get to a live meeting potentially. And all of this with the goal of submitting our NDA in the first half of next year. So absolutely still the plan to submit an NDA for volixibat in cholestatic drag due to PSC. Based on Vista's first half of next year, the strategy between now and then is to build familiarity with the robustness of the data set and kind of bring the review team closer to kind of how we're seeing things before we get to that submission.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#23

Yes. Can you walk us through some of the potential scenarios there? Are you pretty confident that you'll be able to file on existing data? Or are there other data you could use? Maybe what are some of those potential outcomes, I guess.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#24

Well, in the interaction with the FDA, it's already -- it was made clear that we can submit at our election, right? So there's not been something put on the table to prevent us from submitting an NDA. So there is a recommendation from them to run a Phase III study. We think the points brought up in the meeting really can be addressed by the current study. So -- and frankly, we don't know what new would be answered by an additional study. So scientifically we haven't heard something that needs to be answered, that can't be answered in the Vista's data set. And that's what's behind our strategy to take steps forward to bring the current data set to an NDA next year.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#25

Got you. Maybe we can switch to PBC and maybe talk a little bit about the market opportunity there relative to PSC.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#26

So in PVC, we're also conducting a Phase IIb study, adaptive design with filixibat in cholestatic pruritus due to PBC. We already presented interim data a couple of years ago from that study. And that showed a really striking improvement in pruritus versus placebo. In 2 doses of volixibat the adaptive design then took on dose forward for the confirmatory portion. That's the data we expect in the first quarter of next year, granted breakthrough designation have some more clarity on the regulatory front on that one from those interactions last year as well. And kind of tying this to the clinical setting, in PVC, it is -- it's a much larger indication in terms of just overall prevalence -- probably 80,000 or more patients in the U.S. with PBC. And there are other medicines approved in PVC for different settings. So UDCA is standard of care that's generally where patients start. There's a second line setting for those that are not controlled biochemically on UDCA. So in other words, if they have elevated alkaline phosphatase levels they'd be considered for a PPAR which were recently approved. And then in the backdrop, symptomatic management is emerging with new tools available and becoming available. So there was recently an IBAT inhibitor approved for cholestatic pruritus in PBC -- that's relevant across both first and second-line PBC just like we are developing volixibat. So volixibat is being studied in both first and second-line PBC -- in the interim analysis, we -- both settings were represented in those patients. And you see a nice improvement in pruritus across both profiles. So I feel that we're on track to have a potential medicine that can address symptomatic burden across all lines of therapy.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#27

And you're going to share, I think, the Phase IIb registrational study in 1Q. I guess, you shared some prior data is that like a good estimate of what the outcome might be? Or the reason to think the outcome might be a little bit different on the pruritus endpoint.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#28

It's the best evidence we have is from that interim analysis of the VANTAGE study, where we saw a 2.4 point placebo-adjusted difference that -- frankly, that's a really strong result -- compared to some of the other data sets out there, anything around a 2-point difference from placebo in PBC is a really impressive result. So getting close to that in the full data set would be a real home run.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#29

Makes sense. And I guess, your level of FDA interaction on PBC and the risk that they may also want you to run a Phase III study here? Or what's the thinking there? .

Christopher Peetz

executive
#30

We've had the opportunity for more recent interaction with PVC. And one of the things that we've looked at is the division leadership has changed over the course of this program. So more recent interaction, I think, is quite relevant and helpful that we've gotten kind of feedback from the current contemporary team that's in the division. And after the breakthrough designation we were thinking about the ultimate study size for Vantage. We had some flexibility to potentially keep it smaller or upsize it. That was one of the decisions we wanted to feed back on in the context of a pivotal study. So in written correspondence with FDA, we confirmed some questions on study design and on the analysis plan. So I feel like we have more recent input from them. And that's why the study has now ended up over 300 patients in total to align with kind of what other PVC programs have had for their submission data sets. And even in these correspondence, we even have direction on if these studies are considered pivotal, these are the analysis steps that you should take. And we're able to accommodate all of them. So feel like we're aligned PBC.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#31

Okay. Great. And maybe we'll just keep moving here. So for Lovato, HDV, you have some Phase III data coming up soon, but maybe just to start paint-the-picture for us, why HDV, what was attractive for this program?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#32

Yes. So hepatitis delta co-infection with hep B. It's rare, so it's far less common than HEP. But it is far more dangerous than progressive. So it is highly progressive condition where these patients tend to progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, liver cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, like all of these complications at a much faster rate than hep B alone. So the goal of treatment here is to suppress the viral levels. So we're looking at HDV RNA response and improve long-term liver outcomes and one of the ways that's measured in the studies is ALT normalization, looking at that as part of the composite response. In the U.S., we think there's -- we estimate there's 15,000 patients with hepatitis delta diagnosed in care. That's from insurance claims data. So also kind of in the insured population estimate 15,000 patients. But that's -- it's likely very underdiagnosed, the practice and guidelines for testing for hepatitis delta in hep B patients has been more of a risk-based paradigm. And it's likely not even sufficiently doing it at that level. So very low percentage of Hep B patients get tested for hepatitis delta. So we think there's probably 40,000 patients that are in total in the prevalent population in the U.S. So a lot that can be done if we can help support changing some of the reflex testing that really should happen now that there are therapies emerging for hepatis delta. The interesting parallel in Europe, actually where we've seen this play out with approval of about 5 years ago. In Europe, you saw a shift in guidelines. And that did result in a meaningful change in the testing patterns from 10% to 20% of hep B patients being tested for Delta now towards maybe as high as 90%. And the positivity rate on those tests hasn't changed. So they're capturing far more of these patients that would otherwise be undiagnosed and have a more progressive background disease.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#33

And in terms of the data, maybe just walk us through a little bit of what we've seen so far and kind of -- is that a good proxy again for the data coming up here?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#34

The Bravo program has had some just really impressive response profile in the Phase IIa and Phase IIb data set. There's 2 different studies that have read out. Phase IIa was kind of sequential dose exploration study looking at different doses and regimens and that kind of gave the signal for what became the Azure program. AZURE-1 study that has a Phase III readout in the next couple of weeks here. The Phase IIb portion of that, I think, is the most instructive data to look at is randomized, controlled evaluation of 2 regimens of brilovatug versus delayed treatment. Looking at 300 weekly and 900 monthly and nice response across both regimens, in particular the 300 weekly dosing looking quite strong. We're seeing 100% deologic response -- at only 24 weeks, you're already getting a substantial proportion of these patients with ALT normalization. And our program has no baseline ALT requirements. So some of these patients are coming in with very high ALTs so to get them to normal in that time frame is quite impressive from a response profile. And so that's kind of what we look to as the best guide for what to look for in the Phase III readout a lot of overlapping sites from those first patients and AZURE01 to kind of look at what's possible for the Phase III portion.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#35

Makes sense. Can I also ask just about a competitor also is going to have Phase III data coming up later this year as well. So maybe just talk about key points of differentiation or how you position your product.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#36

The real part of what got us so excited about brelovatug really I think will stand out as we get into a competitive launch yet another one. We've done -- we tend to like these situations. The brelovatug is a fully human antibody. I think that has some real advantages on the safety tolerability profile -- in terms of what we see is very low injection site reactions or flu-like symptoms. I think that's going to shine commercially when we had out there. And the response profile at 24 weeks is good and it appears like it's only going to improve over time. So that's another thing that we'll be looking to share data on as we go as some of the data updates as these Phase IIb and eventually Phase III patients get towards 48 weeks or 98 weeks, where with a single agent, fully human antibody, you can really control the HDV RNA levels and get more and more patients to ALT normalization.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#37

Great. Maybe in the last few minutes here, we just switched to just Fragile X Syndrome. Maybe give us kind of the background there and your kind of your latest thinking?

Christopher Peetz

executive
#38

So the MRM 3379 program for Fragile X is a PDE4D inhibitor. And we're looking at trying to impact some of the cognitive scores and measures in Fragile X patients in the dose-ranging Phase II study that we're running. Important to note, this study was based on a signal from a different Phase II program of a PDE4D inhibitor that had an interesting signal on cognitive scores. We've not seen that replicate in the Phase III study. So it does kind of call into question some of the strategy here. I will say that we're asking all the right questions. So in our Phase II program, -- we're doing a more complete dose ranging than was done in this competing program from what we've seen. And one of the things that excited us about 3379 as a program is that it has high CNS penetrant. So it was designed for CNS exposure. That's the right profile for this setting. But we'll have to wait and see what comes out of the data next year. Study is enrolling well, its really engaged patient community and setting. So we'll have an update when we get to data next year.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#39

Yes. Great. I think we covered it.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#40

Yes. I think I really appreciate the time. I think just to kind of come back on a closing thought, we're -- Mirums at real inflection point here. Commercial business on its own is already performing well with that $680 million to $700 million top line for the year. We're seeing that and expect it to really, in the next couple of years, start to play through an impressive way on a margin basis as we start to launch these additional products and build on the efficiency on what we've built here with the liver team eventually having 3 products, LIVMARLI, Bilovitag, volixibat, a lot of reasons to be kind of a leading thought partner for hepatology -- and then on the genetics and endocrine metabolic team, having an exciting launch to work with there with a team that knows how to get out there and have an impact and help bring patients to therapy.

Michael Ulz

analyst
#41

Lot to look forward to. So thanks so much, Chris. Really appreciate your time today.

Christopher Peetz

executive
#42

Yes. Thanks for the time. Thanks for the interest.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.