Mondi plc (MNDI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 14, 2022

London Stock Exchange GB Materials Paper and Forest Products trading_statement 49 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Mondi Third Quarter 2022 Trading Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Andrew King, Group CEO. Please go ahead.

Andrew King

executive
#2

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call this morning to discuss our trading update. I'm Andrew King, your Group CEO. And with me is Mike Powell, Group CFO. I'll start with a brief summary of this morning's announcements before we will take any of your questions. I'm pleased to report that we delivered a very strong performance in Q3, with underlying EBITDA from continuing operations at EUR 450 million, up 55% compared to the prior year period. This was on the back of higher average selling prices and overall volume growth more than offset by the significant cost pressures. We're able to mitigate the impact of the significantly higher European gas and electricity costs, in particular, as most of our pulp and paper mills generate the majority of their energy needs internally. Importantly, our EUR 1 billion expansionary capital investment program is progressing well, and we expect these projects to deliver mid-teen returns when in full operation. Within that portfolio of projects, we are pleased to have recently approved the investment in a new 210,000 tonne per annum kraft paper machine at our flagship Štetí mill in the Czech Republic for an estimated EUR 400 million investment, start-up expected in 2025, with full production ramp-up by 2027. In August, we agreed to acquire the Duino mill near Trieste in Italy. We plan to convert the existing lightweight coated mechanical paper machine into a high-quality, cost-competitive recycled containerboard machine with an annual capacity of around 420,000 tonnes. This converted machine would be expected to start up in 2025. If I then turn briefly to the outlook. While significant geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainties do remain and we anticipate a continued inflationary pressures on our cost base as we enter the fourth quarter, we are confident that the group will continue to demonstrate its resilience and deliver a year of good progress. We remain well placed to deliver sustainably into the future, underpinned by our integrated cost-advantaged asset base, our culture of continuous improvement, our portfolio of sustainable packaging solutions and the strategic flexibility offered by our unique platform for growth, strong cash generation and financial position. With that, I thank you. And Mike and I would be happy to take questions.

Operator

operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Lars Kjellberg from Crédit Suisse.

Lars Kjellberg

analyst
#4

I just wanted to try to understand a bit the sequential moves in the various components. We can obviously see pricing. You called out wood costs and energy costs. And as far as I recall, you haven't hedged your energy costs. I suppose that's redirected. But the one question that is really coming in, and that is somewhat [ more to pay ] because the wood cost development in your wood catchment area and, as you already called out at the half year point, availability. And I've seen some comments from my [ investors ], for example, they even talked about suspension of production because of wood supply issues. So if you can elaborate a bit on the sequential moving parts for that EUR 32 million drop in EBITDA versus the prior quarter, given the strong price environment and also how we should view the various components, cost, price and volumes heading into Q4. Those were my questions.

Andrew King

executive
#5

Lars, it's Andrew here. First, I mean that seems to be a very generalized question. So I think we could unpack into a couple of things. I mean, firstly, the wood cost progression, which Mike can follow. I mean, more generally, the progression on earnings, I mean, it's all about a rising cost base more generally and wood and energy being the 2 most specific of those. And as you rightly say, energy is not hedged. So what you see is what you get on our energy bill. We are effectively structurally hedged. So even though you've seen a massive increase in natural gas and electricity and all related energy costs in Europe, clearly, our bill has gone up as a consequence of that but not as much as you might have expected simply because we have a lot of our own energy generation. So the sequential basis, there's a high increase in variable costs, clearly offset to a large extent by increasing sales prices because we entered the quarter with higher prices, and in particular, in things like kraft paper, as we flagged at the half year, we implemented further price increases going into the third quarter. And we've got overall volume growth, albeit it's mixed in different segments. So that's the overall picture. In terms of the wood cost story, maybe Mike can give you a bit more color on that.

Michael Powell

executive
#6

Yes. I mean, listen, we're talking about -- that was -- is a good quarter and a good year-on-year increase. So -- but the wood probably at half year, our wood costs were half year -- on half year, up about 40% probably. Energy, obviously, was a lot more than that, and we flagged both. Wood costs continue to inflate as Andrew has said. So we see wood being used for other sources of energy, of course, in some parts of Eastern Europe in particular. But wood costs continue to inflate through the quarter. And as Andrew said, the real quarter despite it being very strong, you do see that delta because we entered the quarter at very high prices, and they've relatively been flat through the quarter, but costs have inflated. And therefore, if you want to look at the downside on the quarter-on-quarter, it's very simple on that basis.

Lars Kjellberg

analyst
#7

And on the -- sorry.

Andrew King

executive
#8

Yes. Sorry, I think I was going to add on the availability issue. Yes, I mean wood resources in Central Europe are particularly tight. I think it's particularly in the hardwood segment because hardwood is an alternative energy source. So it is really linked to this whole energy game because in certain Central Europe -- well, in a number of Central European countries, you're finding households and the like are burning hardwood in as a fuel source instead of gas, so people have the alternative to switch between the 2. So clearly, with these ultra-high gas prices and, of course, concerns around security of gas, people have been switching to burning wood in their homes. So that has been a different demand source, which has risen. Of course, it's extremely difficult to predict how that might continue because, of course, gas prices actually seem to be coming down in the spot market and maybe there's a sort of sense that actually the availability issue isn't as chronic as people might have expected. And so you could easily see that switch back over time. But undoubtedly, at the moment, that is causing pressure, particularly in that Central European wood. We've been managing that -- the wood and energy situation. We've also taken some modest downtime in certain of our mills, well, particularly in the fine paper mills, so Slovakia and Austria, in order to manage what effectively balance off the high wood cost and availability issues with the demand picture. So there has been some modest downtime that we've taken as a consequence of wood availability and simply the energy pricing, particularly relevant to Austria because as you know, we have an integrated facility there, which consumes a lot of energy.

Lars Kjellberg

analyst
#9

So based on those comments, I suppose, unhedged energy, somewhat softer energy prices, at least for now, wood continues to rise. So how should we think about cost inflation and your ability to offset that by pricing? I guess it seems as if containerboard prices are, broadly speaking, stable; fine paper, stable-ish or slightly up; and kraft paper, I guess we will find out. But is that an area where you called out still strong demand trends or at least resilient demand trends in craft? Does that continue to see that positive price progression? That was my final question.

Andrew King

executive
#10

Yes. Well, I think, firstly, on the cost side, and of course, it's all -- these things are all linked. I guess it depends which day of the week you ask me because we're seeing -- I mean I'm sure you guys also track the spot gas prices in Europe. They're all over the place. I mean more recently, they have come down, actually the last, literally, few days. So clearly, in our case, that gives immediate relief because we don't hedge. And particularly, for example, the unintegrated, obviously, more generally, it gives relief to those players who are more exposed, I suppose, to the external price of energy and, of course, if one looks at the recycled containerboard cost curve. And this links into pricing, I suppose, because you're seeing some cost relief actually taking place just at the moment because energy prices have come off to some extent. As you well know, PFR prices have come off to some extent. And I guess that the cost pressure that existed actually a few weeks ago has probably alleviated to some extent. And that, in turn, is clearly feeding through to the fact that, generally speaking, the price increase at the recycled containerboard industry we're talking about not that long ago has dissipated but dissipated because it was premised on higher -- on cost inflation, which seems to have modified a bit. But I mean, as I'm sure you could all appreciate, this is a highly volatile world, and one simply doesn't know from 1 day to the next 1, what the spot price of energy and PFR and the like might be as similar -- related to that is also the whole issue of the capacity that was taken out on a temporary basis as an industry over the sort of summer months. It seems like some of that is coming back as people have got confident in their cost base as being mitigated to some extent. And of course, that will have an impact on the supply-demand balances going into the back end of the year.

Lars Kjellberg

analyst
#11

And on the kraft paper question, just on the demand part of the question.

Andrew King

executive
#12

Kraft paper, we -- as I mentioned, we've got a meaningful increase at the half year. That's held very well. We've had a very good quarter in our kraft paper and more generally in our flexibles business going into the final quarter. Obviously, bags has a seasonally weaker quarter normally, and I stress it's seasonal because the construction period is through -- the height of construction, particularly in Europe, is obviously through the summer months in Europe. And so generally, seasonally, you expect a weaker quarter. And of course, we also take a lot of our kraft paper downtime. The maintenance shuts and stuff in Q4. So quarter-on-quarter is always dangerous to look at in terms of -- because there's always a sort of seasonal, and as a consequence, that's the way we retime our shuts as well into Q4. So Q4 is normally a slower quarter than Q3 for seasonal reasons, not necessarily driving -- calling on the cycle.

Lars Kjellberg

analyst
#13

I get that. But the kraft paper price, that was more what I was referring to, if that maintains that momentum.

Andrew King

executive
#14

The kraft paper price is holding steady, yes.

Operator

operator
#15

The next question comes from the line of Cole Hathorn from Jefferies.

Cole Hathorn

analyst
#16

One, just following up on the demand question Lars raised. Is there any commentary you can give on what you're seeing in some of your end markets, the construction end markets for the paper bag side as well as your -- generally, your retail, et cetera, just so we can get an understanding of how that's developing on the sack and kraft or Flexible Packaging business? And then similarly, on the corrugated, any kind of demand commentary you can provide? And then the second question is on the Russia disposal. Could you just clarify the process from here? Hopefully, we get the Russian approvals for the transaction to come through. But what would be the process from Mondi side once you've got those Russian approvals? Would it effectively be once the Russian approval is in space, then you do the shareholder meeting and then ultimately complete and get the cash? Just to understand the sequence of events.

Michael Powell

executive
#17

Carl, thanks for your questions. Let me start with the second one, and I'll let Andrew take the first. So yes, just a reminder, so the approvals that the buyer has to deliver are twofold. One is on antitrust. And the second one is to get approval from the subcommission, and with that approval for the agreed SPA that we have with them is the agreement on the funds being delivered to an account of our choice in a currency. Once those approvals have been cleared, there is -- because it is a Class 1 transaction, we need to have a shareholder meeting, which we would call. And then once that has been done, then we can close the transaction, and then, of course, the funds will flow. And then just as a reminder, we have committed that the net cleared funds would be repatriated to shareholders as soon as we practically can. Hope that answers that one for you, Cole.

Cole Hathorn

analyst
#18

Just a clarification. So you'd kind of get the funds in, I would consider, like an escrow account until the shareholders approve, and then it would flow out. There wouldn't be kind of risks of...

Michael Powell

executive
#19

No, I don't think -- I think the timings may well interact with each other. So I mean we'll work through that, but we would need to have the shareholder approval before we can close the deal.

Andrew King

executive
#20

And on the demand -- sorry, on the demand question. So on the flexible side, as I reiterate, I mean, we had a strong quarter in Q3, very resilient demand across, frankly, most end users. I remind you, in terms of our sort of mix, we have probably 400,000 tonnes odd now of speciality kraft papers and then 900 million, somewhere around that, tonnes of sack kraft. On the specialty kraft papers, clearly, a lot of that goes into retail applications from that rebuilt machine of producing the paper bags for retail. And then a lot of it also goes into things like foodservice and some into industrial applications. I think the retail paper bag is probably a bit softer right now. I think simply footfall in retail shops is probably a bit lower, and you see a bit of that coming through at the moment, not terrible, but it's certainly a bit softer. And foodservice, these type of things, extremely resilient, if anything, quite strong. And industrial, a bit softer, maybe, but as we look forward -- but it's certainly not particularly concerning or anything like that. So I mean when you ask the detail of our end users, you can hear it's a mixed picture, but -- and you really do have to look at the individual end use applications. On the sack kraft side, as you know, a lot of it goes into building materials. In Europe, that's the building materials for, call it, DIY applications and things on bulk delivery in that, whereas in what we call our overseas markets, the export markets from Europe, a lot of that is into cement and the like. The export market's holding up very well, very resilient. Europe, it feels a little bit softer, but certainly, no real concern around that but just a bit softer than it has been in what was extremely strong markets for the last couple of years. On the corrugated side, likewise, I always remind everyone that we are very much a regional business in Corrugated Solutions, and we distinguish here between Corrugated Solutions volumes and our containerboard volumes. Containerboard volumes held up very well, continue to do well. We are a low-cost producer delivered into the markets that we serve. So we do extremely well there. On the Corrugated Solutions side, we are a regional market in northeast in Europe and Turkey. Obviously, every one period can be a bit different, particularly in the likes of Turkey, where it is volatile. So it's more of a regional difference rather than a kind of end use difference. In terms of end users, as you would expect, the food and beverage and those sort of things are pretty resilient. E-commerce has been -- continues to be good, but signs that it's slowing down. Industrial is mixed because, again, I think it will be dangerous to generalize. It's more of a regional differences there than anything else. So I hope that helps.

Operator

operator
#21

And the next question comes from the line of Justin Jordan from BNP Paribas Exane.

Justin Jordan

analyst
#22

Just 2 quick questions, if I may. Just firstly, following up, Andrew, on -- I suppose, your comments on outlook being flexible. Can you just remind us, you've got clearly a number of, I suppose, annual and semiannual fixed price contracts, which I believe typically are renegotiating in Q4 of the year. Given the index price moves we've seen and the comments you've made regarding further price increases achieved in around H1 and into Q3, I assume we should be expecting price increases on those annual contracts post renegotiation? Or is that now in question given there's some slight softness in demand that you're commenting on? And then secondly, I just want to clarify something on Russia. I appreciate it's a very complicated situation. But I just want to clarify that the Board's intention is ultimately 100% of whatever net proceeds are received will be distributed to shareholders. Is that still the Board's intention just on the Russian disposal?

Andrew King

executive
#23

Okay. I'll take that easy one first. Yes, that's the intention. So as we stated, and it remains the intention on the dividend story. On the question of flexibles and you're talking specifically about -- well, actually, sack kraft paper is the one that has a lot of annual price -- well, some annual price contracts. I mean it is less than it used to be. More and more, that business is going to either semiannual or, if not, floating pricing. So the annual contract sort of negotiations on quite as big a deal as they would have historically been. But nonetheless, they still are important, and it is still the sort of next pricing event, I would say. But on the speciality kraft paper, it's much more fluid, and it encompasses a number of different subgrades that you would be pricing at different times at different -- on a different basis. But going into the annual price negotiation, I mean, we haven't started those, simply put. So I think it would be extremely premature to be able to sort of prophesize what might happen. And I think it's incumbent on us to be talking to our customers first before we tell you what might be happening. So I think we're going to be -- going into those negotiations. I mean, clearly, there's a general increase in costs, and that is self-evident for everyone to see. And the markets remain resilient, but we need to have those discussions with our customers.

Operator

operator
#24

And our next question comes from the line of David O'Brien from Goodbody.

David O'brien

analyst
#25

Just 3 quick ones, please. Mike, you were good enough to give us a steer around energy costs at the interim stage. I think you said you might be looking at up to EUR 950 million for the year. I just wonder if you could give us an update on where you see that. We know it's quite volatile. Secondly, just on the move into Italy with the Duino mill. I guess how should we think about the opportunity to build a more substantial Western European corrugated business over the medium term when you see moving into kind of paper assets into the likes of Italy? And finally, just on the CapEx projects, what kind of EBITDA contribution are you expecting for 2022? And do you have an early steer on maybe what the contribution for '23 could be, please?

Michael Powell

executive
#26

Yes. Let me take energy. I mean it's not a bad number, more by luck on judgment given the volatility of the markets, but I think it's still probably a good guide for the full year number. In terms of EBITDA on projects, I think we said it would be about EUR 60 million for this year. And I think we've probably -- certainly, on some calls, talked about EUR 50 million next year. I think this year, it's obviously a bit softer just because some of the projects are suffering from the availability of the wood. There's nothing fundamentally changed with the quality of the projects. They're more affected by some short-term dynamics around that wood availability that Andrew has talked about. So a bit early to call next year. But there's nothing other than some good in terms of the timing of the projects and, fundamentally, the long-term nature and deliverability of the CapEx execution projects there, David.

Andrew King

executive
#27

Yes. And just on, I call it, Italy ambitions. I think more broadly, corrugated and our -- well, our corrugated value chain being containerboard, corrugated, we have an extremely strong platform there. We have a fantastic platform on the upstream containerboard side. It's extremely cost-competitive production, well located to serve our growing sort of markets around us and a strong network of converting plants in the recycled containerboard space. Our belief has always been strong physical integration is an important facet of that business by contrast to the virgin grades where you can be an open market player and sell into a broader market, which we do. But on the recycle side, we believe strong forward integration is important. The Duino mill, as we stressed when announcing it, offers us the ability to backward integrate our Turkish containerboard requirements. We are short of recycled containerboard in Turkey. And this -- if you look on a map where this mill is located, it's right next to a port, which has got very good access into our Turkish network. So we are able to supply very cost effectively, we believe, from this mill into Turkey when it's up and running. But obviously, it also opens up avenues for us to be supplying into the regional market that -- where the mill is located. And we'll -- we like our corrugated business. We have every intention to continue to grow our corrugated business. And if this throws up opportunities for us to develop further in that region, then, of course, we will look at those. But first and foremost, the priority is to firstly complete on the transaction. And secondly, to get on with the conversion, and that immediately gives us the benefit of integration into our Turkish corrugated network.

Operator

operator
#28

And our next question comes from the line of James Twyman from Prescient.

James Twyman

analyst
#29

I've got 3 questions. Firstly, could you give us the maintenance cost number for Q3? And secondly, seems to be a bit of kraftliner price weakness at the moment. So I'm just wondering in terms of your view on whether this is a trend or whether you're attempting to reverse the weakness that we're seeing. And then thirdly, just your opinion on how much downtime has been happening in the industry, mainly on the recycled side. But what's your view on what percentage of the industry may have been down and maybe what you're seeing at the moment? That would be great.

Michael Powell

executive
#30

Thanks, James. James, maintenance is about EUR 30 million. I'd probably expect the same in Q4.

Andrew King

executive
#31

And then on to the much easier question of what's happening with kraftliner prices next. I mean, firstly, kraftliner prices are currently stable. I mean, clearly, every market -- and I know everyone looks briefly in different markets and things like that. We'll have to see how that develops. I mean, clearly, there are -- and this, I guess, comes linked into your other question around the downtime. And as I said earlier, I mean, a lot of capacity was taken down through those summer months. We would estimate it was probably something like 15% to 20% of European recycled containerboard capacity, which was idle for some period of time. Obviously, we don't have total transparency on the that either. We can also just read the same things that you probably do, but that would be our sort of estimate. So it was a meaningful reduction in -- or short-term reduction in capacity. Clearly, it's extremely expensive to take that downtime because you've got a fixed cost base and no revenue essentially while you're doing it. So it typically doesn't last very long. As I said earlier, I suppose some of that capacity has been incentivized to come back on because of the lower PFR prices, which are ironically, as a consequence of those downtime, being taken because obviously, demand for PFR then reduced. And so hence, the price has come down sharply. I mean the price of PFR is probably down over EUR 100 a tonne over the last month or so. So clearly, that has given the higher-cost recycled containerboard producers some cost relief, and at the same time and more recently to that, even energy prices or gas prices have also been coming down to some extent. Again, who knows where the next move is on that? But at the moment, they're coming down. So I think that is -- that's what's given the kind of relief to the high end of the cost curve to kind of allow them to come back into the market. Clearly, it coming back into the market increases supply, and one would have to assume that that's going to make it very difficult to get further price increases at the least. And they might -- we'll have to understand whether that gives rise to some of these guys giving some of this -- the cost relief they've seen back to their customers. It's early days, and that, we'll have to see. And of course, the kraftliner prices ultimately are -- have a link to the recycled containerboard prices, and we'll have to see how that then plays out. So I'm afraid I can't give you any more definitive answer to that because I simply don't know because these are some big moving parts that one we'll have to continue to watch. And so yes, I think that answers both the pricing and downtime questions you had.

Operator

operator
#32

And we have the next question from the line of Sean Ungerer from Chronux Research.

Sean Ungerer

analyst
#33

Just to hop on the sack kraft and bleached sack kraft price increases. Just to confirm, so post the H1 results, there was a bit of a price increase that went through in your spot business. Could you confirm that, please? And then just secondly, the noncash gain in the uncoated wood-free business, could you just comment on that, please? And then lastly, I'm assuming the commentary around the cost control initiatives is the usual money sort of stay in business. How do you guys practice? Or is there any specific sort of cost savings programs that you guys have introduced?

Andrew King

executive
#34

I'll take certainly the paper price question, and I think your phrase was a bit of a price increase. I would suggest it was a bit more than a bit. I mean it was a meaningful price increase at the half year. And yes, it was fully implemented, and it's been in place throughout the quarter. But to be clear, that's on the sack kraft business. Speciality kraft paper business has a number of other different levers, and there's been -- there's also been various movements in there. But obviously, the primary half year increase was on the sack kraft side. Maybe just touching on that cost control question. Yes, I mean we're not believers in grand statements of cost reduction processes. We believe we should always be working on our cost base. Clearly, in these times, you redouble your efforts because every efficiency gain you can make when input costs are on the rise as they are just gives you even more of a payback. So it's the imperative around driving efficiencies, driving productivity and the like or just that much more enhanced. And -- but it's not about some grand restructuring program, which typically frankly, you kid yourself that you're actually delivering on these things, but we believe in constantly driving our cost structures, driving our efficiencies on luck. And that puts us in good stead. And we'll continue to look at that. Obviously, we also have some capital expenditure programs, which also facilitates cost optimization, particularly around the sole energy situation. As you know, we've invested a lot of money over a long time, not because we foresee the sort of the current energy crisis in Europe that just because it was good business even at lower energy prices. Clearly, it makes it even more -- those return on those investments are even better now with -- at the current spot energy. And we think there are other things we can do on the energy side, which will enhance our cost effectiveness. So we will continue to look at those and exploit those.

Michael Powell

executive
#35

And in terms of the noncash forestry fair value gain in Q2, it was probably around EUR 20 million, and therefore, sequentially in Q3, it's about EUR 30 million, EUR 35 million. That really reflects, obviously, the increased cost of wood. The value of the trees are worth more, and therefore, you'd expect a slightly higher gain, and sat here today, we'd probably expect about the same number in Q4.

Operator

operator
#36

And the next question comes from the line of Daniel Isaacs from 36ONE Asset Management.

Daniel Isaacs

analyst
#37

Just wanted to ask, it's probably difficult to give more insight on. But just wondering, I mean we've seen a couple of deals from other companies from Russia being confirmed and paid out, et cetera. I mean is there any feeling from the guys on the ground there? Or what's happening with the process? Is it because the deal size is relatively large that it's usual for it to take this -- to take a bit longer to get confirmed or anything like that?

Andrew King

executive
#38

Thanks for the question, Daniel. I mean I really think we're in the realms of total speculation here. So I think it would be wrong for me to comment on any of that. As you know, this is a process where the buyer seeks approval. That process is underway, and I think it would be wrong for me to speculate on exactly how that unfolds simply because there is no formal timetable that the authorities are under around us, and we need to see how that unfolds. So I'm sure you'd understand if I would avoid any speculative commentary on that.

Daniel Isaacs

analyst
#39

Yes, yes, sure. No, I was just curious, I mean, if there's any sort of maybe deal size guidance from any department on time or anything like that, but it doesn't sound like it. It sounds like it's all upon just up to a certain someone to make [indiscernible].

Andrew King

executive
#40

Yes. There is no categorization by deal size, if that's your question.

Operator

operator
#41

And the next question comes from the line of Saul Casadio from M&G.

Saul Casadio

analyst
#42

Just a clarification on your energy bill, you clarify your fuel mix. But also what I want to understand a little bit more about your electricity bill -- because that is also especially in Europe linked to gas prices. So wanted to understand if that 10% of gas exposure also includes the electricity billing with some estimate or you're treating electricity differently and trying to better understand the link to gas of that one, considering I'm not an expert in utility bills.

Andrew King

executive
#43

Sure. No, also, I mean, we give that indication because that's pulp and paper mills where the vast bulk of the energy consumption takes place. We do procure electricity as well. We are largely self-sufficient in energy -- electricity. So I think we produced about 80-odd percent of our energy -- electricity needs from our own energy sources, so the biomass fuels, gas, coal, all the other energy sources. So the -- you are correct in that electricity costs are also going up. So when Mike gave that indication in rough terms, I think we spent EUR 450 million on all our energy input costs last year. So that includes electricity. It includes coal, gas, the biomass that we buy in specifically to convert into energy, all of those different sources but clearly inclusive of electricity purchases. And that bill has basically doubled year-on-year. And that clearly incorporates the effect of electricity sort of -- on the electricity bill of higher-input gas and the like. But by far, the biggest component of our energy, as I say, is made from our own biomass plus biomass energy that we buy in and that accounts for about 80% of our total fuel usage, but it's probably, call it, 75% of our total energy usage, including electricity, so the electricity component is relevant, but it's not a significant portion of our total either spend or consumption. And then as I said, roughly speaking of our fuel requirements, gas is 10% of that order of magnitude.

Saul Casadio

analyst
#44

Okay. Okay. That's helpful. But just to follow up, if I can, of that EUR 400 million roughly energy bill, what is the electricity component? Just of that bill, not the consumption in general, but just what you guys spent.

Andrew King

executive
#45

I don't have that number off the top of my head, but it would be a smallish component of that. Because of that bill, it's everything from the biomass that we purchased rather than the one that comes through the recovery boiler plus coal, light fuel oil, gas, obviously, all manner of mix of that, so the electricity component. I can't have it, and I'm looking at Mike and [indiscernible] off the top of his head, but it's not a huge component, but of course, it's also been rising exponentially relative to other input costs. But I think very importantly, for us, of that total energy usage, we have a significant portion of it through biomass energy and through our own biomass energy generation, and that gives us the natural hedge. And as we've stressed before, we don't hedge our energy input costs. So what you see is what you get, which is also a good thing when prices come off. We don't -- you'll see it immediately in our numbers as well. And right now, our energy costs are coming off.

Michael Powell

executive
#46

Thanks, Paul. I think we've got time for one last question, operator.

Operator

operator
#47

And the last question comes from the line of Cole Hathorn from Jefferies.

Cole Hathorn

analyst
#48

It's a bit of a longer-term question, but you've mentioned wood cost and availability rising through Central/Eastern Europe. If we think about that from a strategic perspective and where your mills are located, we're always worried about new supply coming on stream, mostly on the recycled side. But on the virgin side, does this argue that the availability to put in a new virgin mill or conversion machine is more challenging? Ultimately, what I'm trying to get to is, is your asset base in Central/Eastern Europe well placed because new capacity addition is going to be more challenging because of wood availability?

Andrew King

executive
#49

Yes. Thanks, Cole. I mean I think we've always said one of the reasons we like our, call it, significant virgin-based paper production is because we think, a, there are higher barriers to entry. And secondly, it's typically a steeper cost curve. And if you're well positioned on that cost curve, you can do extremely well on a through-cycle basis. I think we've proved over the years that, that premise has held true. And you're right in the sense that the current situation because it's really driven -- I mean, it's driven by the Ukrainian crisis, this whole thing for 2 reasons. One is, obviously, the Russian wood basket has effectively been -- is now off limits to European producers. We didn't ever rely particularly on a lot of imports from -- hardly any imports of wood from Russia and/or Belarus. But it was serving some supply into Europe. And of course, then related to that is the whole energy crisis and the fact that, as I say, wood has been used as an energy source. So those things combined is what's made the markets particularly tight at the moment. But there's always been a structural challenge of accessing competitive low-cost fiber resources to make virgin product. We are very well placed because we are the incumbent producers in the particular regions in which we operate. And hence, the reason you also see a lot of our expansionary CapEx in this area is around the incremental capacity expansions that we can achieve at those cost-advantaged operations that we have. So I'll remind you, we're spending just under EUR 100 million in Swiecie in Poland to produce another 50,000-odd tonnes of integrated pulp and paper production. We know that will be highly cost competitive. This new machine in Štetí that we mentioned here is diverting essentially 100,000 tonnes of pulp that we have on the dryer at the moment into our paper machine, and then we can squeeze out another 100,000 tonnes of pulp out of the existing pulp operations with modifications, and that's where the CapEx goes and to produce then 200,000 tonnes of fully integrated low-cost kraft paper. But these things, I agree with you, are -- it's not easy for others to replicate. In fact, it's virtually impossible. So I think that does create -- I mean, a strong structural advantage, which we've had -- we've always said we've had and we continue to build out on an incremental basis. At the same time, we have a fantastic downstream business as well, which also gives us a real strength because as you know, in kraft paper, we are, by far, the biggest consumer of kraft paper as well with our expansive -- extensive bag network, which is a global business, and that gives us a real strong integration strength as well. So yes, I mean, we firmly believe that all of these structural advantages are here to stay and, if anything, compounded by recent events and remembering also that kraft paper -- one of the big competitors is based in Russia and, obviously, cannot now sell into Europe. In fact, the most recent sanctions have explicitly stated that these products are sanctioned for export from Russia into Europe. So all of these factors, coming specifically to this new paper machine of ours, we see as a significant advantage that we enjoy, and we'll continue to leverage. So I think that's a very good basis on which to end this call. So again, thank you, everyone, for your attention. Obviously, Mike and myself are here if any follow-on questions that you may have, but otherwise, have a very good day, and I'll pass you back to the operator.

Operator

operator
#50

That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may all disconnect. Have a nice day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Mondi plc transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Mondi plc earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.