Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 9, 2023

NASDAQ US Health Care conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#1

Thanks for joining us. I'm Tazeen Ahmad. I am one of the senior SMID biotech analyst here at Bank of America. Thanks for joining us at our conference again this year. It's my pleasure to present our next management team Neurocrine Biosciences. Sitting with me are too familiar gentlemen. To my left is Kevin Gorman, who is, of course, CEO; and to my right is Matt Abernethy, who is the Chief Financial Officer. Gentlemen, thanks for joining us again.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#2

Thank you very much, Tazeen, and also thank you for letting us speak here again.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#3

Of course. So I think, Kevin, at this point, most people know about the company and what it does, but maybe you could just give us a quick 1-minute intro about Neurocrine and then we can go straight into Q&A.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#4

I see how you put that time constraint only 1-minute.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#5

Just a minute, just a minute.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#6

So Neurocrine is a neuroscience company, has been throughout the entire history of the company. Neuroscience test means neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuroendocrinology. We have our leading product that we sell that was discovered and developed at Neurocrine is INGREZZA. This is for an irreversible movement disorder caused by antipsychotics. It's called tardive dyskinesia. The product's been on the market for 6 years now, and we've given annual guidance for this year of $1.67 billion to $1.77 billion. So it's been truly life-changing for TD patients. Having said that, we're still only hitting a small fraction of the TD population. So there's a tremendous amount of growth with this product. We have been building over the last several years a pipeline in all 3 areas that I collectively said make up in neuroscience, and I'm sure we're going to talk about those. It's approximately 14 drugs that we have in the clinic, and we'll be adding to that later this year. And I would say that we have a very healthy balance sheet that we're constantly looking to put to work. So that was the 1-minute.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#7

Yes. Perfect. Thank you. So let's talk about INGREZZA. This is a mature launch now, but at the same time, there's still a lot of upside opportunity. So you did have a good quarter relative to, I think, previous cycles. I think the gap between 4Q and 1Q results wasn't a dip in the way that historically it had been. Should we expect that to be the case on a go-forward basis now that the drug has normalized in so many different fashions, you can better predict a lot of what's happening. And of course, you do have a lot more resources on it.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#8

Lots there. So you're right. The drug is a drug that's performing really well. What I would note is that if you look at it from a sales perspective, in our sixth year, this is a 36% increase year-over-year. That's pretty remarkable for a drug. But let's talk about the base business because that really tells you the health of your franchise and the health of the company. The base business is over 30% year-over-year growth still in year 6. When you -- we have a seasonality to the drug, as you alluded to there, Q1 is usually our most difficult quarter. Why is that? Well, we're a drug that is a specialty drug, meaning that in Q1, a lot of patients are changing insurance or a lot of insurances, whether it's government or whether it's private pay, require that you get reauthorized, all happening in Q1. And every year as we grow the number of patients that we have under care. That means that, that reauthorization pile gets larger and larger. We've gotten pretty good now. I think at doing that. We do still get some surprises, I think, in some years where we have instituted policies in order to, in a very compliant way, be able to help prescribers and pharmacies be able to deal with that influx in order to make sure that there -- the patients all stay on drug throughout Q1 and into Q2. So as you said, normally, there's a dip from Q4 into Q1. We did not have this here. Normally, you see a weakish Q1 because we call it 1/4 of 2 tails. The first half, everybody in the field is just trying to make sure that patients get through the reauthorization and get their first refill for the year. They're not out there doing what they really like to do, which is bringing the medicine to new patients. And so they only have the last 6 weeks generally to do that. Our team really outperformed this time. They got basically everyone on drug pretty rapidly, and we set a new record for new prescriptions, NRxs. To have that happen in Q1, we would have told you that can never happen in Q1. So it really was quite good. We've -- in our earnings call just was that a week ago or 2 weeks ago...

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#9

Just last week.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#10

They are in together, yes.

Matthew Abernethy

executive
#11

It seems like months ago.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#12

I think people got a little bit nervous when we said, hey, Q1 was outstanding. When you've seen us have a low Q1, that means we didn't get everybody in, in Q1. That means all those patients, all those prescriptions then flowed over into Q2. Q2 is a lot better than relatively to Q1. We had a great Q1, not that flow over of patients in the Q1. We're going to grow in Q2, absolutely, we're going to grow in Q2. Is the delta percentage-wise, the absolute dollar-wise going to be as big as what it is when you have a bad Q1, let's say, or a more traditional Q1? No. It can't for that. But on the other side of that, so a little bit of lumpiness between Q1 and Q2. But on the other side of that, when you have a Q1 like this. When you get all those patients reauthorized and a record number of new patients all in Q1, they're with you the entire year because INGREZZA is an incredibly sticky drug. The patients, their family members, caregivers, all of them, the nurses, the doctors, all the health care providers, it's immediately obvious the impact that INGREZZA has on their movements and on their life. So they're with us all through the year. And so the more you bring in Q1, the more those refills go. So Q1 has set us up for a great 2023.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#13

Okay.

Matthew Abernethy

executive
#14

So it's our second straight year of sequential growth. Q4 to Q1, historically, we saw a large step down. And when you think about the dynamics that Kevin laid out, there's also a gross to net headwind that always occurs in Q1 as well from the donut hole that patients go through. So when you think, as Kevin said, the fact we grew TRx sequentially, and we delivered in dollars, it was a nice quarter for us.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#15

Right. So I think Kevin mentioned the record number of new patient starts, for example, in Q1. Where do you think that's coming from? Is that from your investment in your sales force? Is it just patient awareness continues to grow or is it something...

Kevin Gorman

executive
#16

So we did 2 big investments that were last year and also into this year because it's an ongoing investment. One is that we grew our sales force and I'll talk about that just a little bit more in a second. And we reinvested in direct-to-consumer advertising and launched our new DTC called Impressions. We have used all the metrics. We've had a DTC campaign, an unbranded campaign that went on for a couple of years, several years ago. We've had a branded campaign that's been going on 2 years now. When you use the normal industry standards in order to evaluate ROI, the DTC has been highly ROI positive beats out the benchmarks we set up for ourselves, beat out the benchmarks that is normal and customary for the industry. So we're going to keep that DTC campaign going throughout this year. That helps bring patients in, obviously. But probably the biggest thing is sales reps, that person to person detailing that takes place. Not only did we increase substantially our sales organization. But importantly, we went from a single sales force that 80% of their calls were on psychiatrists, 20% were on neurologists to now, we broke them into 3 sales forces. The psychiatry sales force stayed the same size, which is our largest number of reps. But they only call on psychiatrists and advanced practice professionals, which are psychiatric nurse practitioners as what they used to be known as. But it's like we increased them by 20% because they no longer call on any other specialties, just psychs. We then formed the second largest sales group, which is the neurology sales group because we knew that there were more patients we could go deeper in the neuro area and knock on wood someplace, that in August 20 of this year, we're going to have the second indication hopefully approved for INGREZZA, which would be in Huntington's disease, which is a purely neurological sale point, neurologist sale point there. So we rightsized ourselves to be able to do both tardive dyskinesia and Huntington's disease into there. And then third, something that we always wanted to go into, but we couldn't bite off all of that when we launched and when we were ready to launch into this third area, COVID hit, that was long-term care facilities. So we had a plan. We had it on the shelf as soon as everything with COVID subsided, we launched now an LTC sales force. We estimate that maybe up to 15% of TD patients are in a long-term care environment. Now getting directly to your question that you asked. You only gave me a minute for opening remarks.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#17

Take as long as you like.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#18

The psych sales force, they, as I said, they're our largest -- they're the ones that stayed -- all the territories stayed intact. There was no change to any of their territories, minimal disruption that we're doing there. I would say that the bulk of our growth that we've seen comes from that psych sales force. Next comes our neurology because this was all launched. This was all launched back in April of last year, usually takes 2 to 3 quarters until new reps are starting to really get their feet, understand their territory and start performing like what we call legacy reps. So the psychs did that quickly. The neurology sales force, I think, is next in line, and you're seeing them adding more and more now. They're really getting up to speed. The last one is that new area that we've gone into, which is long-term care. So while we hired in that sales force with a lot of experience in long-term care, none of them were experienced in INGREZZA. So they've come up to speed on INGREZZA. They've been prospecting their business. LTC is a very different area to go into than community mental health centers, or going into a private offices of psychs or private offices of neurologists. They're very different. They're group homes, they're behavioral health homes. They are long-term care facilities, actual facilities. There's some geriatric centers, there's learning disabled centers that you go into. These are wildly different from one another. But we think that most of the TD patients are probably in just a few thousand of the many, many, many thousands of what are clumped together as LTC. So they're the ones that we haven't seen the impact yet, all right? That's going to be -- as this year goes on, we will then see their contribution.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#19

So a couple of questions. Thanks for being descriptive on that, Kevin. How should we be thinking about the contribution from long-term care this year?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#20

Yes. I would say that they will be very much outstripped by psych and neurologists. But as the year goes on, you're just going to see a step function as they contribute more and more. And like I said, we think that up to 15% of TD patients are in LTC. So it really should be a meaningful area for us to be in. And also, there are Huntington's patients in LTC facilities. So we'll be training up again if we get approval on August 20, which we have all the confidence in the world, but you never know, that we will have that approval in Huntington's disease, we'll be trading up the LTC sales force also on Huntington's.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#21

Okay. So everything you just described to me are all positive trends, upward trends. So based on the results that you got for sales in the first quarter, maybe this is also a good question for Matt. How are you thinking about sales guide? Is that something that potentially could be revised as the year progresses?

Matthew Abernethy

executive
#22

Yes. I mean, our goal is to continue to grow INGREZZA to maximize the opportunity we have ahead. It's amazing. I think you called it a maturing launch. The growth that we're seeing in our seventh year now is pretty amazing. And I think it just reflects the opportunity we have ahead. So we had a great Q1. It sets us up for a really nice year. And I think once we get through Q2, we'll see how we're performing and look at our guidance at that point. But we're very optimistic about what we have ahead of us for INGREZZA. Now one comment or note because I was asked this morning, and Kevin just alluded to it. We have not included anything for Huntington's disease in our annual guidance range. We don't expect it to be a big contributor in -- later this year just based upon the timing of when the indication might get approved, be more meaningful in 2024. But wanted to make that clarification.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#23

Sure. So actually, that was on my question list anyway, so we might as well talk about Huntington's. You'd be competing against Teva with AUSTEDO who's been in the market now for some time. And as you said, it's a neurology touch point. So what portion of that pie do you think could go to INGREZZA over time?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#24

Yes. So it's interesting. So there's not only deuterated-tetrabenazine by Teva that's been in there for some years. Now that was their first approval. But there's like 4 generics of tetrabenazine that -- and these are VMAT2 inhibitors, but they have many off-target hits into there. So they're not an exquisitely specific drug that is made just to hit in VMAT2 like INGREZZA is. So when you look at 4 generics, a branded drug being marketed into HD and as we've shown in our Phase III program exceptionally efficacious in treating the movements, the Chorea -- of Huntington's Chorea, they have only captured about 20% of the relevant population there. So why would that be? Well, there's a number of reasons. But with all of them, there's a big pill burden, and these patients have -- it's very difficult for them to swallow. They also have a lot of jaw clenching in Huntington's disease, so they could crush tetrabenazine or a deuterated-tetrabenazine and get a dangerous drug dump because particularly with deuterated-tetrabenazine, it's a formulated drug. And so that is a big negative there. And there's a complex titration that takes place over several weeks. Everything that I just mentioned, INGREZZA has none of those liabilities. So we're not a formulated drug. Our drug is a 1 pill once a day because of the inherent pharmacokinetics of the molecule. Number 2 is we have no titration. First dose can be an efficacious dose. Third, you can chew, you can break up, you can sprinkle on anything that's if you cared to make it easier to swallow for these patients with INGREZZA. So there are a lot of advantages, and I haven't even gotten to the mechanistic, which is the biggest advantage of INGREZZA that lends itself why we're the market leader in TD and why we should be every bit the market leader in HD even coming in this light. So what that tells you is our strategy is not to go after the 20% and switch them. Our strategy is looking at the 80% who are VMAT2 naive and go for that. And so that's a strategy that we're going to be using going forward.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#25

Now you've talked about your very established relationship with the psychiatric prescribers, and that neurology was your second area of focus. How has the split in INGREZZA scripts evolved, if you will, between psychs and neurologists. And if it's been sticky, is that something that you expect to stay that way? And do you think that's something that can be changed?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#26

Well, what I would say prior to expanding the sales force and breaking them into 3 specific sales forces. The relative contributions of prescriptions written in the psychiatric arena versus the neurologist arena really mirrored the call pattern, 80% call pattern in psychs, 20% neurologists, and that's how it looked. I would see that both of them are going to rise, but they're very competitive with one another. So you're going to see, on a percentage basis, it may stay very close to that. Psychs see the vast majority of TD patients. Neurologists get TD patients referred to them. That's why we're in there. But they're generally getting referred by general neurologists in their area, and these are movement disorder neurologists that we're seeing. So I think they are both going to increase, but their relative contribution may stay the same.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#27

Okay. So if Eric was here, he's not here, but if he was, what would he say is the biggest challenge going forward your mature launch, but you're still growing exponentially? What would you need to do in order to keep those trends the way they are?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#28

Yes. And Eric is going to say the same thing that I've said that those of you who have followed us, it's getting a little bit tiring, but I think you're seeing is nevertheless very true. Even with a drug that's approaching $2 billion in sales, you're still seeing this great growth all the way through. We expect that to continue because, honestly, it -- everything has to do with educating the prescriber educating the patient and their caregivers about what TD is and then about INGREZZA and the effects that it has on your movements but more so on your life, that's there. How is that evident? Well, only about after 6 years, only 30% of TD patients have received the diagnosis for TD. And half or less of that 30% is actually getting prescribed a VMAT2 inhibitor. Even though APA guidelines updated 2 years ago, say first-line treatment is a VMAT2 inhibitor. So you have 70% undiagnosed, 85% of TD patients out there not being treated. That's an enormous opportunity. That is not a mature market by any stretch of the imagination. It really comes down to what we've been doing. And I think what we've been doing an exceptional job at, it's education, education, education.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#29

Okay. Do you think you need to educate people more?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#30

Ask me not here.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#31

Okay. So maybe let's talk about pipeline for the few minutes that we have left. I think the one that people express most interest in is trying to support for CAH. Can you talk to us about what the data catalysts are going to be this year and how we should level set expectations?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#32

Sure. So as I said, we have a deep and rich portfolio -- clinical portfolio, again, in neurological drugs, neuropsychiatric drugs and neuroendocrinology. We have 4 important data readouts that are taking place in the fourth quarter of this year, 2 of them are in Phase III. They are the 2 Phase IIIs with crinecerfont, which is for to treat congenital adrenal hyperplasia. This is an orphan disease that is due to a genetic lesion where the babies are born without the ability to make cortisol. And without cortisol, you die. And all of them dead until the early 1960s when hydrocortisone was invented, and so that allowed them to live. And now we have CAH patients who are actually in their early 60s. Nothing has been developed for CAH patients since hydrocortisone. That's it. There you have a disease. Any of you that have had to take prednisone, a corticosteroid, you know that your physician only gives you a package for about 7 days. They want you on it fast and then a slow taper for the next 6 days, get you off of that. So it's for usually just very short periods of time because of all the side effects that taking exogenous cortisone can cause. These kids and adults have to be on hydrocortisone or other corticosteroids every single day of their life. And it's not just trying to replace it levels. That would be fine if you're giving low doses. They have to be given super physiological doses in order to one of the other manifestations of the disease, it's the endocrine system at its finest. You have many pathways. And if you've blocked a pathway because of an enzyme mutation where you can't make cortisol, then all the precursors that would normally go to cortisol and others dump into that other pathways. What's the other pathway? It's massive amounts of androgens. So a virilization, a masculization, poor bone health, everything else that goes with that and especially for females to be virilized now through all of the massive androgens that are being made. The only way that this patient population and the endocrinologists who treated it have been able to deal with it is with very high doses of hydrocortisone. So they try to turn the system against itself. Crinecerfont is the first opportunity to actually introduce a nonsteroid orally active small molecule drug that goes in and recaptures the system so that you don't make those high levels of androgens. And we've shown that convincingly in Phase II studies, both in children and adults. Well, if now you've reregulated that access, that endocrine access, then you only need to give. One would think logically, replacement levels of their hydrocortisone. That's what the Phase III program is set out to show. Scientifically, it makes a whole lot of sense that you could then lower the -- you take care of all the deleterious effects of the underlying disease with massive production of androgens and you can take care of probably equally devastating effects of taking high levels of hydrocortisone all your life, you should be able to bring that down. We're the only company that's ever attempted to do a Phase III trials in this. So we utilized all the world's experts out there for a number of years in designing these trials. We think we have the best design possible. But there's your risk. When it comes to the CAH, your risk is a trial design risk. So we're going to learn a tremendous amount. I have a lot of confidence that we're going to turn out to have positive Phase IIIs here. But if we don't -- if it's muddy, we learn a lot from it. We know the drug works. It's not a binary event. So I'm not trying to set anything up for anything. I don't know anything. It's a double-blind study. I don't have any data. I'm just trying to give you what makes you say reasonably expect, this is going to be a home run, but because it's never been done before, you have the time to [ temper ] that a bit.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#33

Okay. So can you just talk to us about what would be good for your primary endpoint?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#34

Well, what we -- so it's a different primary endpoint for the kids versus adults because what's the most difficult part for each one of them. For the kids, the primary end point is lowering androgens. Second -- key secondary endpoint, and there's several secondary endpoints, but key secondary endpoint, as I said, is reduction of exogenously taking glucocorticoids. Flip it for the adults because of what's more important to them. So as I said, I think in the first step, it's showing in a Phase III setting, what we showed really nicely in a Phase II setting, we can lower their endogenous hormones and androgens and then showing that we can have an effect on the amount of glucocorticoids that they have to take. Those are keys, I think, to this. But we'll be looking at all of the endpoints that we have in there. And look at the totality of the data as we put it together and then go to discuss with regulators at the end of this. And that's not the only studies. As I said, we have 4. So we have a Phase II study in focal onset seizures with a highly specific and potent sodium channel. Nav1.6 blocker that's going to read out in the fourth quarter. . And then we have another Phase II study in anhedonia. Anhedonia is prevalent in a broad, if not all, neuropsychiatric diseases. It is the blunting of your ability to feel pleasure. It is looked upon that you just don't care. And you see that across major impression, anxiety, psychosis, all of your major mental health disorders. And so we're running a Phase II study in that, that will read out. And then we have next year in 2024, several other Phase II and Phase III studies reading out.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#35

So I think people in the past or now you can say that you have a limited pipeline. So I'm sure that your view is clearly the opposite of that, you just listed off a number of programs that you'll have near-term readouts for. But in general, what's your view on business development? So you did make this announcement earlier this year about a new partnership with Voyager, but I think people's view was that, that was something that wouldn't really materialize significantly for several years in a commercial way. But is there any desire on your part to continue to look for more mid-stage assets that could be complementary to your commercial?

Kevin Gorman

executive
#36

Yes. I would say that our focus is exquisite on mid- and late-stage opportunities in business development. We have a lot of firepower there of being able to put several million dollars to work in that area. So we are highly vigilant on that. And it's a great place to be with Neurocrine with a wonderful R&D group, basic research that is -- our bread and butter has always been small molecules, but going into the 21st century of neuroscience now. We understand that we can be by the end of this decade curing neurological diseases, and that means biologics. And so we have all those capabilities within Neurocrine. We have an outstanding team of medical scientists as well as basic research scientists. We have a very strong balance sheet, and we are out there vigorously looking in order to even make Neurocrine a more robust company going forward.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#37

Perfect. With that, we are out of time. So Kevin, thank you.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#38

Thank you.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#39

Matt, thank you for coming.

Matthew Abernethy

executive
#40

Thank you.

Tazeen Ahmad

analyst
#41

Thanks, everybody, for joining us for this session. And if you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks, Guys.

Kevin Gorman

executive
#42

Thank you.

Matthew Abernethy

executive
#43

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.