New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited (NZL.NZ) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 21, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Robert Campbell
executiveWell, welcome, everybody. Thank you for joining our call for our report on the 6 months ending 30 June. We really appreciate the support and interest that's being shown in our activities. The proceedings will be I'll hand over to Richard, who will run us through the presentation, and there will be ample opportunity for questions for Richard, the manager or myself on behalf of the Board when that's completed. So Richard, I'll hand over to you.
Richard Milsom
executiveThank you all. Welcome, everyone. For those of you who are joining us for the first time, I'm Richard Milsom. And with me in the room, I've got Xavier Lynch. We're going to run through a quick presentation for the results for the 6 months ending the 30th of June 2025. And I am here to take questions at the end. So the key take aways from the 6 months ending 30th of June was that we acquired a high-yielding highly productive dairy farm, which increased annual total rent by close to $300,000. We sold 2 pastoral properties at above the most recent valuation, which was a December -- 31 December '24 valuation. Our interest rate hedging increased to 81%, up from 65% at the same time last year. Importantly, AFFO per share or free cash flow per share has grown nearly 40% versus the same time last year. Gearing has been lowered slightly from 30.5% to 29.8% and there's been a dividend declared of $0.0216 per share, which is the equivalent of 80% of the half year AFFO. Financial highlights and metrics. The key points here are that there's been CPI-linked rental increases of just under 14% on approximately 16% of NZL's portfolio, which took effect in June 2025. As you know, all of our properties have uncapped half ratcheted CPI-linked rental growth. Total assets of the company are $445.2 million. Net asset value is $230.5 million. Net asset value per share is $1.589 and gearing is at 29.8% as I mentioned. In terms of an operating review, we've been through the fact that we bought a highly productive dairy farm and we sold two pastoral farms at most recent valuation. We're keeping a time line of properties sold and transactions since inception that revolve around net asset value per share and farms versus their valuation. In terms of the outlook and the FY '25 forecast, as most of you will be aware, our leases incorporate regular uncapped CPI growth and accordingly, inflation will result in rental growth. And furthermore, because -- land ownership and not a participant in operations, we are insulated largely from inflation on -- relating to on-farm costs. We're forecasting full year AFFO of between $7.5 million and $8 million in aggregate. And this excludes cash. This excludes further income from properties with put/call arrangements in place, which are largely capitalized. This is AFFO per share of 5.17% to $5.52%. Our dividend payout ratio in keeping with NZL's policy is 60% to 90% of AFFO. And you can see below the chart below shows that AFFO per share has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 20.4% since FY '22. In terms of NZL's cash yield growth, AFFO has increased on an absolute per share basis, since listing it was forecast and continued to do so. We've said that we're forecasting aggregate AFFO of between $7.5 million and $8 million in FY '25, which is a 9.8% increase in 2024, and we're targeting minimum AFFO growth of 5% per annum, but believe we can do slightly better than that. If we walk through our financial results for the half year ended 30 June '25, we've seen FFO grow 25% per share and AFFO grow 39% per share. We've seen a profit loss -- we've seen net profit after tax of $3.48 million and earnings per share of $2.42 million. The balance sheet has total assets of $445.2 million and net asset value or total equity of $230.5 million per share, that's $1.5891 per share. In terms of the debt summary, we've seen gearing come back ever so slightly from just over 30% to a touch under 30%. The weighted average interest cost is 5.6%, 81% is hedged. And you can see that there's a debt facility expiry profile there. And as we spoke about at our last result, we bought Bank of China into our banking syndicate. We've got [ 3 charts ] on total returns, which we'll continue to update as the company goes along. Net asset value per share has grown 4.9% compound annual growth rate since inception. AFFO per share has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 20.4% and dividends per share has grown at a rate of $20.8 per share, although in FY '23, we suspended the dividend. In terms of our sustainability program, we released our annual climate change disclosures on the 29th of April. The report really represent a significant step in deepening our understanding of how climate change may affect our business and supports the development of our internal strategies to enhance the resilience of our portfolio. We've got a very deep model that overlays data forecasting of which areas are likely to be the most affected and can feed into long-term decision-making properties with relative longevity to others. At the heart of this is the New Zealand Earth System Model, which is a cutting-edge data-driven simulation platform, which is often referred to as the ultimate crystal ball. And it uses vast datasets and complex algorithms, but it really is a world-leading tool in terms of insight and much like a modeling in terms of where climate change is going to affect the world and particularly New Zealand and in particular rural countries. As to the sustainability program it's still enduring land for life. It remains the same. Here's the reminder of the framework of 5 pillars. One of the highlights is our native forest regeneration. So we partner with our team at New Zealand Forest Leasing and take a particularly active management initiative approach to encourage native regeneration, which includes fire management, large-scale intensive pest animal control, pest plant control and forest health monitoring to ensure that the pine trees to act as nurse crops, incubating a very lively and healthy native regeneration. In terms of the outlook for dairy farmers in New Zealand, which make up a material part of our portfolio. Overall, we're seeing record lows since 2018 of debt levels in the sector. We're seeing record high cash profits and increasingly positive bottom lines, which bodes well for tenant sustainability, viability and cash in the system. As you can see on the left-hand side, the dairy payout is at record highs and the carbon price continues to hold steady. In terms of our dividend and share buyback program, we've resolved to pay an interim dividend of $0.0216 per share, which is 80% of our half year AFFO. Our dividend policy remains to pay out 60% to 90% of AFFO, and we maintain our dividend reinvestment plan. In terms of share buyback program, we continue to have a live and active share buyback program. We haven't repurchased any shares in this half year because that hasn't hit target pricing. This is a slide from Investment Partners that demonstrates their outlook on growth, yield and forecast growth across different property vehicles, which has NZL in there. And I think on that note, what I'd like to do is pause for a moment and invite people to ask any questions of Rob or myself or Xavier.
Robert Campbell
executiveOkay. Thank you, Richard. We have some questions that have come in already. Shall we, I think, work through those first just in order that they popped up on my screen. First from Shane, can we talk about the opportunities for NZL to continue to deploy capital? What do you look for in an investment? I'll get Richard to comment specifically, but in general, the opportunity set that we have is really good. We are finding potential assets for acquisition across a wide range of primary sector land assets. We get some bought to us and some we find. We're not at the stage of being able to make any commitments or announcements about that, but it's an active process for our manager. What we look for an investment is quality assets with the potential to return through the lease as sustainable and attractive rental returns and we're still looking for increasing diversifications in the assets that we focus on. But Richard, anything more specific you want to say about this?
Richard Milsom
executiveI think you've covered it pretty well, Rob. We look for high quality assets. We look to buy them well, and we're looking for the best of the assets in a particular sector at a time where there's an opportunity to buy them well and an asset that's going to be able to return above average -- that we think is going to return above average cash flow and asset value growth over the long term.
Robert Campbell
executiveSo the next question again comes from Shane that follows on pretty logically from there. NZL has benefited from some solid structural rental increases on the past year. What does the structured rental growth look like for the next year, Richard, I'll get you to answer that.
Richard Milsom
executiveSo we're expecting to see -- we've got -- our forestry properties have annual rent increases. So we've seen just above 2% CPI for this for -- since last year on those forestry properties. Our horticultural properties close to 3% and our dairy farms in South, which are due for their 3 year are just under 10%.
Robert Campbell
executiveThank you. Let's then move on to Shane's next question. Given the improvement in dairy and hort industry profitability, how does NZL's current rents compare to market rents? You're unlikely to get a Chairman to confess that our rents are widely different, Shane, than the market, but you can probably comment more specifically on that, Richard.
Richard Milsom
executiveThey're at the upper end of market. We're not wildly outside. We're definitely not below. We're probably in the upper bracket of market.
Robert Campbell
executiveMoving on next question from Nicholas Hill, looking at the split of AFFO between the Land Trust and NZL as well as the movement in redeemable partnership units on the P&L, it looks like the Land Trust has been buying more partnership units over half 1H '25. Is that correct? If it does, does your current F '25 AFFO per share guidance reflect this, Richard or maybe even Xavier can comment on that?
Richard Milsom
executiveNo, we haven't been buying any partnership units of late.
Robert Campbell
executiveNo, I can't quite understand maybe that's something that we could have a look at. Why the numbers are suggesting that? It's not something that occurred to me, Richard or Xavier, unless you can comment on why the numbers suggest we might have?
Richard Milsom
executiveIt's probably because there are additional costs at NZL that don't exist at a land partnership, particularly to do with being listed. And so there's not necessarily a 75-25 split when you aggregate the numbers up.
Robert Campbell
executiveYes. Possibly just have a look at that afterwards and go back to Nicholas in more detail, but that seems quite likely, doesn't it. Next question also from Nicholas. What are the assumptions underpinning your longer-term minimum in FY '25 AFFO target of $9.4 million i.e., any acquisitions, major re-leasing events, interest rate assumptions? How does your hedging look like beyond financial year '26? We can probably give you a live fairly general answer on that, Nicholas. I'll ask the guys to do so now, but it may be that that's a question that needs some follow-up answer. But Richard, over to you.
Richard Milsom
executiveIt's a very easy answer. We forecast the granular detail to the end of FY '25. And later this year, we'll put out a granular forecast at the end of FY '26. Beyond that, what we've done is accrue growth of 5%, which is our minimum target growth of AFFO. It's not necessarily a granular forecast with CPI and interest rate assumptions in it. It's to show what AFFO per share would look like at a minimum target as opposed to a granular forecast out to FY '25 and '30.
Robert Campbell
executiveThanks. Next question also from Nicholas. What's the rationale for maintaining a DRP. You don't seem to be in a position where debt is putting pressure on your balance sheet or earnings, raising equity at current prices is somewhat expensive and does not appear to be needed. Nicholas, we did have quite some debate about the DRP. We're concerned primarily to be a consistent -- to have consistent behavior from the company about what we offer to shareholders. And so we were forced to, on one occasion, not maintain the dividend and then obviously reinstated it when we were able to do so. We think that has caused some doubts and concerns amongst shareholders and potential investors in the business. Having instituted a DRP, we think it's important to maintain continuity on that because some shareholders do value it quite highly. We are a business which is still intent on growing, and we will be making further acquisitions as we move ahead and as we're able to do so. It's certainly true that raising equity at current prices is not cheap, but we have limited opportunities to do this. And as I say, it's primarily regarded by us as a service to investors who do value that opportunity. Richard, you can add to that perhaps, but that's Nicholas is the explanation for why we've maintained it at this point. It will, of course, be something that will be addressed during the capital review, which we are going to be commencing quite soon.
Richard Milsom
executiveI think you covered it, Rob. I don't have anything useful to add to that.
Robert Campbell
executiveMoving then to one from [ Francois ], thank you [ Francois ]. What is the current weighted average capitalization rate on your portfolio? Richard or Xavier, you got that number in your head?
Richard Milsom
executiveIt's approximately 6%, but this is probably a number we might start publishing in our regular presentations, Francois. That's a good question, but it's approximately 6%.
Robert Campbell
executiveYes. It does appear to me, Richard -- it occurs to me that it's a logical question to ask. So it's one we might as well answer as of have it in our releases. It's a good point, isn't it?
Richard Milsom
executiveYes. The escalation mechanism for the new farm acquired, is again every 3 years? Yes, it's a dairy farm. So the ones we sold were 3-year escalations. The new one continues to be prior escalations because of the time that it usually takes for dairy price changes to wash through. There's a strong preference in dairy farms for every 3 years versus horticulture and forestry, but it is a cumulative CPI catch-up, so you get it all accrued just with the lag.
Robert Campbell
executiveThank you, Richard. The next question from [ A. J. Mack ]. In the interest of increasing the share price to close to net tangible assets, would NZL consider selling some of the existing properties above valuation? We do consider this. Obviously, you need to have offers. We are intent on growing our portfolio. So while we would recycle assets, and as Richard was about to say, we have recycled some assets by selling and acquiring assets with higher yield. And that is something that we address actively, but we haven't currently got any proposals that are necessarily to do that. We see that as part of normal asset management, and it should, when conducted will assist the share price, but it's not simply a mechanism of trying to move the share price closer to NTA. It's just an active management of a property portfolio is the way that we think about it. But Richard, please add to that, if you wish.
Richard Milsom
executiveI don't have anything to add to that. If we get approached and someone is prepared to pay us above market price for something, we'll take it very seriously and we've seen that we have sold. And we've demonstrated over time that we've got the ability to recycle that into attractive investments. And so that will be a natural part of maintaining an optimal portfolio mix over time.
Robert Campbell
executiveYes. So next question is, can you talk more generally about the medium-term risk profiles for different rural asset classes you're invested in and ones you are considering. Richard, I'll hand that one to you because you're more actively engaged in the current assessment of these than I am.
Richard Milsom
executiveSo medium-term risk of dairy, I would class that as low. We've seen on-farm inflation pressure on costs come right back. And I don't just mean the growth in the cost has come back. I mean there's been deflation in on-farm costs, particularly in relation to feed and fertilizer. The milk price is at record highs. We've just seen Fonterra come out with an increase in dairy price next year. Dairy in the medium term looks very healthy from an industry point of view at the moment. Same with horticulture, we're seeing the odd pocket of distress for particular brands, but that's been more management with oversupply as opposed to an issue in the sector. We're seeing very healthy growth in prices and reasonably insulated from any tariff discussions globally in horticulture. Bearing in mind that we own land that's suitable for a wide variety of horticultural products in some of the best work of growing country with water in New Zealand. And so medium-term risk to that, I see it's low. In terms of forestry, again, medium-term risk for that, I see as low. Log prices are pretty good. We're seeing increased interest in carbon. We're seeing the government start to tighten up on policy. We're seeing it hitting hard on farms in certain places and new legislation. So again, I see those as more favorable than negative tailwinds. In terms of things that we're looking at, there's medium-term fluctuation in viticulture with some oversupply of [ SAD ], especially, which is causing a little bit of short-term pressure. We're seeing France ripping out 20% of their grapes and not replanting them. So structurally, we'll see a bit of a correction worldwide in that. It is -- it continues to be a well sought after blue-chip global type asset with attractive lease rates. And so viticulture, I see as nonstructural short-term pain, which provides pockets of opportunity to look at. Solar in terms of rural land that sits underneath solar farms that remains productive with additional high-value uses to them, that remains the main link sector of the market. We're seeing opportunities in forestry, especially on the ground with rules changing and uncertainty around planting for experienced foresters with a sort of proprietary network of origination that remains attractive. And we see pockets in horticulture as well where pricing of highly productive land still hasn't caught up with how positive the sector looks structurally. And so we see attractive sort of risk-adjusted return type opportunities in that sector. Can I -- this probably ties into the next question, which I might carry on to from [ Tobey ]. Should we expect the core dairy exposure share portfolio to continue to be diluted in coming years? What's the target investment mix? So I would probably expect dairy exposure as a share of the portfolio to continue to be diluted simply because the price of dairy land has increased materially in the last couple of years with such an attractive outlook confidence in the sector and lowering debt levels giving New Zealand buyers balance sheet capacity to be out acquiring. And so when I talk about prices not catching up to industry outlook in dairy, we are seeing prices catch up to industry outlook. And you remember in 2021, we were buying dairy when there was short-term pain, but the outlook look good, we bought very well. And you've seen us recycle a couple of those assets recently. I would just expect that the opportunity set in the medium term lies elsewhere. That doesn't mean that we wouldn't buy an adjacent farm or something strategic or incredibly attractive. But as is natural, when opportunities lie elsewhere by product of that, we probably expect to see dairy exposures reduce.
Robert Campbell
executiveYes, I think that's very reasonable. From our point of view, we're very positive about dairy, but the opportunities to buy dairy certainly as attractively as we have bought our existing dairy exposures are pretty limited at the moment. So nothing we'd like better than to buy more dairy if it became available at the right kind of price. But we are aiming to hold a diversified portfolio. And so it's reasonable to expect that dairy would dilute a bit over the coming years. I agree with what Richard is saying. On the question, the next one, which is about how would NZL fund any future investments. Obviously, that's a critical issue in the capital review that we're looking at, at the moment. We look at the full range of possibilities of funding. Right at the moment, we don't, on our current capital base, have a lot of firepower for future investments. We have some, both equity and debt capability that we could access, but the capital review will be critical to making any future decisions about that. So I don't think we can make any sort of further statements about that at the present time. But we will obviously be coming back to it. The next -- there's the next question about wine alcohol and lease rates. Again, Richard, you might want to comment on that. You're pretty engaged in this stuff in the viticulture, not in the wine and alcohol consumption, I have to say.
Richard Milsom
executiveThe forecast, and this is something we've done quite a bit of work on the forecast is for sort of increasing structural deficits in [ SAD ] and high-quality [ SAD ] supply. So yes, alcohol consumption is coming down, some liners, but the sort of blue chip line, if you like, is forecast to be an increasing deficit in supply, and that's the sort of macro environment we like against some short-term pain.
Robert Campbell
executiveThank you. I think that completes the questions I have on my list. Unless anyone has others, we'll close the discussion. But if there are -- if there is more detail on any of these questions, obviously, that anyone would like, then please come back to the manager and if necessary to me, and we'll provide you with a more detailed answer if we haven't clarified it sufficiently. So please feel free to do that. Richard, anything you'd like to cover in conclusion?
Richard Milsom
executiveI'd just like to thank everyone for attending this morning and continue to thank you everyone for your ongoing support. And of course, well reach out to me at any time.
Robert Campbell
executiveOkay. Great. Thank you, everyone, for joining. We really do appreciate your contribution. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.