Norsk Titanium AS (NTI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 31, 2022

Oslo Bors NO Industrials Aerospace and Defense earnings 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Michael Canario

executive
#1

Good morning. Welcome to the Norsk Titanium First Half 2022 presentation. I'm Mike Canario, President, Chief Executive Officer of NTI; and I'm joined today by Ashar Ashary, our Vice President of Finance. We are happy to share with you our results. Please note, our customary disclosure applies to the information in this presentation. The presentation and disclosure are fully available on our website. Thank you. Our vision at Norsk Titanium is innovating the future of metal. We are industrializing a new cost-efficient and environmentally-appropriate production process for the manufacturing of structural metal components. The fundamental approach to metal manufacturing hasn't changed in hundreds of years. Our rapid plasma deposition, we call RPD, process is designed to be used in the existing metal manufacturing supply chain as a direct replacement for a titanium block casting or forging. We are the global leader in wire-based direct energy deposition 3D printing with a broad patent portfolio and published industry standards, the only company with industry standards published. Our technology investments have delivered a digital platform for us to rapidly convert customer drawings to additively manufacture components significantly faster than traditional processes. Our first market, commercial aerospace, is the largest consumer of titanium for structural uses in the world. It's by far our largest opportunity. Success here leads us to apply our RPD technology in defense and industrial markets and ultimately to other hard alloy applications. So it's been very clear from the beginning that Airbus and Boeing are the most key customers to the company currently and in the future and a high priority for us as we go forward. We launched our software development toolkit, RPD Builder, in the first half of 2022. By applying our 14 years of process development experience to automated part programming, we can ensure that we can deliver RPD preforms in days, not weeks or months, that consistently meet the highest material performance standards. This has been a significant improvement for us and for the industry as we move forward. 2022 is a critical transition year for Norsk Titanium. Our multiyear qualification program with Airbus is coming to completion, and the expansion to defense and industrial markets is ongoing. Our goal is to establish serial production contracts with multiple new customers by year-end. We are on track. To that end, we are progressing very well on the technical requirements our customers have given us. At Airbus, we've progressed quite well with material qualification for our machines. The material has all been printed. It's been in the process of being tested and those tests are expected to be completed in the fourth quarter. Airbus also requires a full-scale production trial of our first 2 parts. We are required to deliver 150 ship sets of our first 2 parts within 6 months, and we should initiate the manufacturing of that trial in the coming days. For our defense customers, our first prime contractor, we've progressed through the material qualification stage and received a contract for the development of the first large-scale production part. We've completed full-scale testing on some smaller parts, and we expect initiation of serial production orders by the end of the fourth quarter. We also announced during the first half completion of the first full-scale testing with General Atomics on a UAV part that is of significant structural intensity, and we are working now with General Atomics on progressing to our next components. We achieved a major milestone in completing our registration with the U.S. Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, which allows us to move to serial production on defense programs. Finally, in the Industrial segment, we announced a collaboration with a company called Hittech that provides equipment for semiconductor manufacturing. We developed -- rapidly developed a large-scale part that has now completed testing at their customer, and we're on track to initiate production in the fourth quarter of this year. So we're making great progress on our 3 key milestones in our 3 key markets. We're truly fortunate that through a unique partnership with the State of New York in the United States that we have the installed production capacities to support our growth up through about $300 million of revenue. You see a picture of our facility in Plattsburgh, New York right there, that is the world's largest 3D printing facility, and that facility will be focused almost solely on producing production, serial production parts for our customers. Additionally, we have a smaller facility in Plattsburgh that we focused and segregated for defense applications. In Norway, we have our research and development capability and a team there focused on next-generation materials and machines and software development. We also have the ability to produce product in Norway and are qualified to produce for our current Boeing 787 program. So we're very fortunate that the company has all the installed capacity that it needs to support the growth that is in the near future. And now I'm going to turn it over to Ashar, who's going to talk about the financials for the first half. Ashar?

Ashar Ashary

executive
#2

Thanks, Mike. Just going over the profit and loss statement. As a broad comment, we continue to meet our financial expectations. Overall, the total revenue and other income in the first half of 2022 was $0.9 million. Revenue from serial production and development revenue during the first half of 2022 was $50,000, which was lower from the first half of 2021, mostly due to reduced deliveries on the Boeing 787 aircraft from Boeing to their customers. We expect development revenue on the other hand to pick up during the second half of the year. Other income was $0.9 million in the second half -- sorry, in the first half of 2022. This was mostly recognition of the Innovation Norway grant. Again, this was lower in the first half over the first half of 2021 due to higher grant recognition in 2021. Operating expenses in the first half of 2022 was almost the same as the first half of 2021 at $10.9 million versus $11 million in 2021. Despite rising costs, we were able to maintain our cost level during the first half of this year. Overall, EBITDA is lower at $10 million, mainly due to the decline in the grant recognition over the first half of 2021. As you can see, there was a positive effect of unrealized gains on the foreign exchange impacts between U.S. and Norway. There was $13.5 million -- $13.4 million impact during the second half -- during the first half of 2022, and this is mainly due to the strengthening of U.S. dollar over the Norwegian kroner. Overall impact on profit and loss was we are showing a net profit of $2.1 million, again, mainly contributed from the positive foreign exchange impacts. On the cash flow side, we continue to invest our resources in commercial expansion activities. During the first half of 2022, our average monthly cash burn rate was $1.6 million, which is lower than our targeted $1.9 million a month. We expect second half of 2022 to pick up cash burn slightly given the activities ongoing. This will put us back at the average $1.9 million cash burn rate. We started the year with $22.9 million and spent approximately $9.6 million in operating expenses, $0.5 million in small equipment and minor technology upgrades and approximately $1.5 million financial impacts from ForEx changes and interest recognition. We ended the first half year with approximately $12.1 million in cash. Mike, back to you.

Michael Canario

executive
#3

Thanks, Ashar. Our transition from development to qualification to production are on track. Our customers have very extensive and time-consuming processes to validate our technology, and we're coming to fruition on those. We can't predict specific timing of individual contracts. However, we are quite satisfied we are taking the steps for completion of that process from development and qualification through to production. We offer through our rapid plasma deposition process better economics, better lead times with significant benefits to downstream processing for the metal manufacturing supply chain. But in today's world of reduced raw material availability and high energy costs, we offer a real positive environmental impact. Each rapid plasma deposition machine that runs at full capacity will save 2 gigawatt hours per year of energy. In today's environment, that's something desperately needed. Our mission is to enable fast, clean, sustainable metal manufacturing. The market opportunity is significant, and we believe we have the technology and business model to succeed. At Norsk Titanium, we believe we are the right company at the right time. And with that, I'll take any questions.

Michael Canario

executive
#4

And the first question that I see is, "Understanding that testing is booked as an offset to cost, can you give a number of these offsetting costs in the first half?" I'll throw that over to Ashar, if you could provide a response to that one?

Ashar Ashary

executive
#5

Yes, sure, Mike. So that's how we were accounting for the development of mostly through 2021. However, in 2021, when we did the annual reports, we changed our accounting of the development revenue. We now actually book -- we actually recognize development revenue as revenue. So in the first half, we only showed about $10,000 of development or recognized about $10,000 of development revenue. We do expect that number to change through the second half of this year as we continue to perform on the development programs and qualification programs with our customers.

Michael Canario

executive
#6

Great. Thanks, Ashar. Next question is, "How healthy is your book-to-bill?" Let me try and hit that one real quick and Ashar, if you could provide anything beyond what I say. If we look at our backlog, a traditional measure of our backlog. Today, our production program is on the 787. We have what's called requirements contracts on the 787, meaning we supply as needed, as the customer needs product. So we get 100% of that business. Today, I think most recently, about a month ago, the 787 program did restart production, but there's a significant backlog of prebuilt airplanes and components. So demand, if I look at the actual backlog demand, is quite low for the 787 over the next 6 to 12 months, and then we'll get back to what we'd say is normal rates. We have a series of development projects with deliveries and milestones set up over the next, I'd say, 6 months or so that we have a very strong backlog for supporting those revenues. And then we're expecting, as we've been talking about, we're expecting quite a few new serial production starts here over the next couple of quarters. And that's when we would see a pretty strong backlog for 2023 and beyond. But at this point, I think the significant -- the most significant revenues that we have in backlog are the development contracts that will be coming due here over the next 6 to 12 months. Ashar, anything else?

Ashar Ashary

executive
#7

No, I think you covered it appropriately. We have 7 parts in serial production and those are on the Boeing 787 program, and we will receive POs as there -- as Boeing's delivery on the 787 program resume for the rest of this year.

Michael Canario

executive
#8

Okay, thanks. Next question is, "Can you please elaborate a little bit about setbacks or progress versus your targets launched at the IPO? You have quite a hairy goal of $150 million in revenues in 2026. Do you view that as easier or harder to obtain now? Please explain." Great question. So our IPO was about 16 months ago now, April last year. I think when we look at -- if I look at the most significant changes since then, clearly, we were hoping that the COVID situation was going to be pretty much completed by that summer. I think it dragged a lot longer than it did. It does appear we're finally out of the COVID situation. And unfortunately, it looks like we've rolled right into what we're headed to a global recession, I think. But if I look at the macro environment for Norsk Titanium, it's as strong as it's ever been. I mean we didn't predict a Russia-Ukraine war and the fact that 40% of the global titanium suppliers would come at risk and energy prices were going to skyrocket across the world. But as I mentioned earlier, I think those are macro conditions that are terrible for the world. But we believe that Norsk Titanium is part of the solution, offering an answer to both the rarity of titanium and the availability to get it in the current market. And the fact that we -- our process consumes significantly less energy, I think those are both great tailwinds at our back and I think we can support. Clearly, we didn't anticipate the Boeing 787 program being on production hold for as long as it's been, and that's a big disappointment for us. And we anticipated back at that time that we would have had several more Boeing parts, 787 parts into production. In fact, we had planned those, and we're working to those. That hasn't happened with the hold on the 787 program, and that's a disappointment for us. On the other hand, I think our Airbus program has progressed as expected, and we will soon be announcing completion of the qualification program and providing visibility on the production ramp for our first sets of A350 parts. And I think that's all in support of our 2026 goals. The industrial project, our first one with Hittech, I think, has gone extremely well. We see great traction on that program, and again, are right on the cusp of being able to move into serial production. So I guess if I look at it in summary, the Boeing disappointment and the overall COVID negativity that's out there, I think, have been offset by strong continued performance at Airbus and then the Hittech industrial program. And then finally, I think the defense market is actually stronger than what we had anticipated a year ago, and I think that also offers our ability to sort of recover from a slow start at Boeing. And if I truly look out to 2026, I wouldn't change the target today. I think $150 million of revenues is achievable. Is it harder or easier? It's harder in some ways and easier in some ways. I think the general balance suggests that you don't know what else is going to happen. But I think absent the global recession sort of driving down demand on air travel, which it doesn't appear that that's been an impact yet. But assuming that the aerospace market, the commercial aerospace market, in particular, continues its recovery, I think the target is a good target. Let's see. "Given your funding needs, are you considering other funds than equity?" So we actually just had a Board meeting yesterday where there was a conversation at the Board regarding our funding needs. I think when we look at Ashar's announcement that we have a little over $12 million of cash, and we're burning a little under $2 million a month, does say that by the end of the year, we need to raise some more money. The Board is looking at several different alternatives on that, and I think we'll make some announcements here in the near future as they make some decisions along that path. We don't anticipate a significant difficulty in raising the needed funding. And I think it's more of a question about size and timing and format given the condition of the markets that are out there today. But we'll look at all alternatives and make an appropriate decision at that time. Next question I see is, "Do you anticipate any breakthrough with primes in the defense industry in the near future?" Yes, we do. So we have very active programs with 2 of the defense primes. One, we've publicly announced, which is General Atomics, and we've talked about their activity. Now recognize that they're working with UAVs, unmanned vehicles, that can get rather large, has some pretty decent titanium structures, quite active in use in the Russia-Ukraine war. We have a couple of programs ongoing with General Atomics, looking at some structural elements, hopefully, can move forward with that here in the near future. The bigger opportunity, frankly, is with one of the major primes, I'd say, let's put General Atomics in 1 category of a smaller defense prime and then there's call it, 3 or 4 maybe global defense primes that are what we call large scale. We have a pretty significant material qualification program that's nearing its finishing stages, and we are working with them on some rather large packages of parts for in-production aircraft. And we hope to consummate some contracts with them here before the end of the year and hopefully make some announcements about some purchase orders. So we're on the cusp of that, and we're looking forward to making some announcements in the near future. And then it looks like the last question I see is, "Could you say something on the potential of the aftermarket for your products?" So if you think about the aftermarket, I'm thinking of parts that are actually delivered into the industry and the opportunity to supply spares or repair or other activities along those needs. I think for the parts that we're currently working on, I think replacement parts are typically sold, just like they do with new parts. I think the broader opportunity with our technology would be to support spares requirements for parts that are out of production, where there may not be a supply chain that exists. And in that case, the ability for us to rapidly deliver a part to a customer based on a need that has just a drawing is a capability we're just now getting to the point that I think we can offer the market. Previously, our lead times would have been such that we need to develop a part, and we need to run through a process internally to be able to provide that part. I think between RPD Builder and some of the internal changes we're doing in, in how we can support downstream operations, meaning the machining -- the finished machining operations, how we can support those locally in Plattsburgh, New York quicker, give us the ability to potentially supply into that market. I wouldn't say that I see a significant revenue opportunity in the near future there, but it is an opportunity to put an additional leg on the company in terms of supplying. And I think that's where our industry standards and our capability to meet the delivery needs of customers is something we can market off of going forward. It's what we look at as a downstream business model. And again, I think we're capable of doing that, but I think that it's not something that I see significant revenues on in the near term. I think a question is, "How many parts did you produce in the first half?" It wasn't a lot because I'll have Ashar answer the actual number, but it wasn't a lot. As you recall, the 787 has been in production hold for over a year. And so we supplied a small amount of parts into the supply chain that were required, but it wasn't significant. Ashar? I don't have a real number.

Ashar Ashary

executive
#9

Yes, I don't have the real number off on hand here, but I think it was between 40 to 45 units that were supplied during the first half.

Michael Canario

executive
#10

That would make sense. I think if you look at some of the other announcements in the -- that have come out over the last quarter, where other companies have answered questions about Boeing's production rates on the 787, and the number that's sort of quoted by a lot of people in the supply chain is a build rate of about 2 ship sets a month, and that sort of number fits with about 40, 45 parts for us. It's not significant, and it's not what we hope to get that back to. And then the last question that I see is, the -- "What is remaining from Innovation Norway?" And I would just say from Innovation Norway, the current set of grants, the 1 thing I will say is we're hopeful to present to Innovation Norway some opportunities for follow-on projects. I can say that the Innovation Norway grant was a key part of our ability to launch our RPD Builder program, software development kit that was one of the activities that was coming out of the Innovation Norway grant, and we're continuing to work on a series of other projects as we finish that product out. Ashar?

Ashar Ashary

executive
#11

Yes. So in terms of funding, we've received 80% of the funding on the Innovation Norway grant that was granted to us in 2020 -- early 2021. We recognized revenue of approximately 70% of that towards completion. We do expect to be -- to complete the projects this year, by the end of the year. So we expect to be funded the remaining 20% upon completion.

Michael Canario

executive
#12

Great. And I see no further questions. I want to thank everybody for joining the call this morning and being part of our journey here at Norsk Titanium. Looking very much forward to our next discussion. As I anticipate, we'll have lots of news to talk about. And the team at -- I have to pass on my thanks and really congratulations to the team at Norsk Titanium. We had a really good first half in hitting our key objectives that we're driving forward for 2022 and which will lead us into 2023 and the transition from development through qualification and into production on several key projects. And I look forward to sharing that news with you as we go forward, and thank you very much, and have a great day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Norsk Titanium AS transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Norsk Titanium AS earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.