Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Daniel Jester

analyst
#1

All right. Great. Chad, are you on? And Craig, are you on?

Craig Boelte

executive
#2

Yes.

Chad Richison

executive
#3

Yes.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#4

All right. Well, thank you again to everyone who is participating today, day 2 of Citi's Global Virtual Technology Conference. I'm Dan Jester. I'm one of the software analysts here at Citi. And very pleased for this session to have Paycom. We have Chad Richison, the CEO and President; and we also have Craig Boelte, the CFO on today. So thank you both for joining us, and really appreciate your time.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#5

So as I think everyone on the line knows, Paycom is a leading provider of HCM software. And so I don't want to go over sort of the history of the company, Chad, because I think you've said it many times before, and I think everyone understands the background. But I do want to jump in and talk a little bit about kind of what you're seeing today because you reported your last quarter about a month ago, but certainly, the world feels like it's kind of a day-to-day. So I think just to kick off the conversation, maybe at a high level, kind of take us through kind of what you're seeing today on the ground, and then we can go from there.

Chad Richison

executive
#6

Yes. I mean we'll update through July. Like I talked about on the call, we had a very strong second quarter from a sales perspective. I mentioned that from a new business sales perspective, and then I mentioned that second quarter was our best quarter from a new business sales perspective and July was our best month thus far in our company's history from a sales perspective. And so that's really been driven by high demand for both a differentiated value proposition, which we definitely have; as well as driven by our advertising spend, which we have accelerated through these COVID months.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#7

Okay. Great. All right. So let's just talk about sort of the impact that your current customers you're seeing today because they're living through a pretty significant challenge, many of them. So on one hand, you've had lower employment, and that has impacted you. But on the other hand, I suspect that you are seeing engagement because as companies navigate these times, moving to a digital, more automated solution certainly presents a lot of opportunities. So for your current customers, kind of how are they navigating this environment? And maybe walk through your current customer base, what they're seeing today.

Chad Richison

executive
#8

Yes. So as I reported at the end of 1st of August, actually, as I reported then, for us, we saw a pretty dramatic trend within our clients early on that stabilized about the end of April. And at that time, in the last call, I actually mentioned that I wouldn't really expect to see major improvements in those numbers without there being major news. Unless some state that's been closed down, now all of a sudden doing a lot more than they were doing in the past or unless the travel industry is coming back, there's just -- you wouldn't expect necessarily we would get a large movement in the current client number as far as the impact on the reduction in force until we see some help from that. So that's where we're at with that. From a new business perspective, as I mentioned, in August, at the end -- during our earnings call, and again, I'm talking about through July because I don't want to really give any new information on this call that I haven't previously given, we saw a strong demand for our product. And so you're right, it's been a double-edged sword. We do have an impact to current client revenue based on reduction in force. But we've also seen accelerated new business sales based on the value proposition resonating within the market. And so in one area, obviously, I believe we've hit a floor in impact to our current clients from a negative perspective. And I don't know that there's a ceiling in new business opportunity for us, being that we have captured about 5% of the TAM, maybe a little less than that.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#9

Got you. And just in terms of your current client, is there anything that you would call out in terms of are they asking for relief in terms of billing or payment terms? Are you seeing anything that could impact sort of your cash collections that you would call out?

Chad Richison

executive
#10

No. As I mentioned before, I mean, our model is very fair. I mean if you had 300 employees and now you have 50, you were paying us for 300 employees, and now you're paying us for 50. We charge you based off of the number of people that you pay. And so that's how our products are actually built. So it's been a fair model. Now is that to say, you wouldn't have certain clients that have additional struggles and could be looking for help one way or the other? I mean I'm not saying that nobody's asked, but for us, we have a fair model, and we've stayed true to that model of you pay based on the number of employees that you pay.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#11

Got you. And in terms of selling back into the base, has that changed? I know that's not a priority for you. Getting new clients is the priority. But certainly, there are opportunities to go and provide new services to your current customers. So have you seen any change in the willingness of those customers now that we're past the worst of the pandemic? Have you seen any change in them engaging you to kind of deepen their buy from you?

Chad Richison

executive
#12

Yes. I mean we've always aggressively tried to sell into our client base. It's just that those sales were dwarfed by the overwhelming majority of all of our new revenue added on being from new client logos or new clients to us. So we've always sold aggressively into the market. We've continued to have success with that as we've shifted over to this employee usage strategy. Obviously, for companies to deploy a full employee usage strategy, you need a full product if you're going to go hire to retire. And so that trend of continuing to sell more product, both into our client base as well as at the time of initial point of sale, that's a trend that's been continuing to improve, if you will, just based on the improvement of the value proposition. And so we've seen that continue through COVID.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#13

Okay. And then turning to new business. You did comment on the last call and you commented this morning about sequentially how things have improved since the first quarter. I'm just -- can you talk about some of the new business that you booked? Any change in terms of its -- how many of modules people are taking, industry composition, geography? Anything that has changed relative to what you would look like maybe 6 to 12 months ago from a new client perspective?

Chad Richison

executive
#14

No. I mean it's been progressively getting better from a new client perspective. As I've said, we've continued to sell at the top end of our market. We continue to sell more product as clients are onboarded. And so that's stayed consistent. As we've moved through this, we've become more efficient on the sales side, just like we're all connected right now through Zoom and probably very few of us connected this way before. Well, that's just like all the prospects out there right now. They also are all connecting this way. And so it does make it a little bit easier for us to engage with them more comprehensively when we're going through our product. And so we've picked up some success doing that. And I believe what's really driving that is the need for technology. I think we're all using technology these days that we probably weren't using before, and we have people more willing to use technology these days than maybe what we did before. And so I think all of that adds up to future success for us, which is being driven by new business sales right now.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#15

And so when this first started, you had a pretty aggressive pivot that you've talked about in the past in terms of getting the sales force reoriented to this new environment. Can you just give us an update in terms of what your sales force are doing? Are they back in the office? Are you still going to be remote for a while? Is it dependent on your clients and whether they want to see you in person? Kind of how have trends evolved there over the past few months?

Chad Richison

executive
#16

Sure. So we're doing the same that we've been doing since we left. So there's been no change on that. We're still selling virtually. And so we aren't going into clients, and we aren't going into the office. And so sales reps are all working remotely. Would there come a time that sales reps might work remotely from the office? I mean if it's safe to do that, then obviously, there may come a time when we would do that. Would there come a time where we would go back into the office, back into our prospects' offices to make sales? I mean to the extent that they start allowing that, which, I mean, at some point, they will. And then also, what we don't know, I believe that we've changed why prospects buy through our technology and our value proposition. Not 100% sure how prospects buy has changed yet, but it might. I bought my first shirt online about 2 months ago. Before that, I was a go-to-the-store kind of person and buy a shirt once a year. So my habits have changed through buying. I would expect that everyone has had some level of change in their life through technology purchasing in that. And so we'll just have to see. We're going to meet the prospect where they live. If they live in online purchasing, we will meet them there. If they live through in-person purchasing, we'll meet them there. And so we're going to really let the prospect dictate that.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#17

Is that similar across all of your prospect sizes? Like selling to a 4,000- or 5,000-person organization, is that different than a 500-person organization today from that standpoint?

Chad Richison

executive
#18

It would be -- yes, it's the same right now from that standpoint. Now before COVID, below 50 employees, we already were selling in the virtual model. Now everybody was in the office, but they did not go out to prospects' offices. They sold from the chair in the office. So now we're doing that same thing in outside sales, which has been our traditional outside sales model, which would sell companies that have 500 employees as well as companies that have 10,000 employees.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#19

Okay. And as you think about some of the success you've had in virtual selling, how does that alter your calculus about making incremental investments in the sales force? Over the years, you've obviously opened a lot of sales offices, but you've also been hiring sales teams at your headquarters. So kind of how do you think about that in this current environment? Is it too early to pivot one way or the other? Or is there enough evidence to suggest that maybe you don't need to have 75 offices, maybe you can have 60 or 55?

Chad Richison

executive
#20

Well, no. I think the offices, the number of salespeople is really based off of total opportunity that we have out there in the market. And so yes, we're going to continue to add sales teams. Now your question as to will they be virtual or not. Obviously, anything we had during COVID would be virtual. But it won't take us any time to shift back into the office if that's where the strategy goes. And so it's really going to be about not how we sell, but how they buy is really what we're going to let dictate that. I think that more businesses are probably becoming a little more acclimated to buying technology online. You've had to. I mean anybody that's upgrading servers or buying firmware, I mean, anything you're buying right now, you're probably buying online. And so the longer we're in there in this type of situation, could that become more of the norm? Maybe. I just -- I don't know enough about that yet. But right now, I mean, it's 100% online. We're not getting prospects requesting us to come into their office. So if it changes on their end, we'll maintain a similar look to what we have today. But I do -- I really believe in being in the office as a company. We aren't right now, and we don't have a good reason to be. If we were manufacturing widgets, we would have to be in the office. If we were a grocery store, we would have to. So we have certain luxuries that maybe many of our own clients don't have in that certain scenario. But I do believe in being in the office, I do believe you build a culture that way. I think had we not been in the office before this, we wouldn't have the same culture we have today that's helping us move through this pandemic with success. And so I do see us going back into the offices at some point. Will we go back out to clients even when it's safe? Well, that just depends on whether or not buying habits and buying patterns have changed.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#21

Great. And when you start conversations with new customers, new potential customers, say, and you're building your pipeline, is the catalyst for them to start that conversation, has that changed relative to a year ago? And how so if it has?

Chad Richison

executive
#22

It has changed. I mean we've always been the single database hire to retire, but the users have changed. As we look at it now, you look at the employee usage strategy, that's really what shifted things. You had to have a single database before you could shift to an employee usage strategy because you can't roll out 8 different products to employees that are rarely integrated, especially in the mid-market. And so you had to have a full system. As we've rolled that out to an employee, and especially as we've advertised that differentiation in the market, our advertisings that we're running, you will notice they say Paycom, but they're also advertising a different way to use a product. We're very clearly saying the employees should be transferring data, they should not be sending e-mails, making phone calls and that type of process. They shouldn't be doing that, and then having HR and others input the data. Employees should have control over what they input. They should be able to confirm what they input, the same way they do in their consumer lives when they order a coffee or a flight or work with their bank. They're doing everything direct with the database. And then oftentimes, they come to work and it's 1992. And so that's really what we're driving at. And so I do think now when a client comes in, and this is a difference from a year ago, we just put out the DDX in April of last year, okay? When we're getting clients last year, we're still dragging them into usage. They're coming willingly, but we're still bringing them over to usage. Now we have a lot of clients call us because of usage. They want to have their employees use. Maybe they bought different products, and they always knew they can deploy usage strategy, but didn't really want to. And then the pandemic started, now they've had to deploy usage strategy. Those same products they thought would work for them that they had never really went through and tried to stress test them from significant usage haven't been working for them the way they thought. And so they still want that strategy. And so I don't see that going backwards. I mean I don't think that anyone -- I don't think any HR department should ever input a data point from an e-mail. E-mail is not a secure way to transfer data. You don't even know who it's from. You can't even confirm the data if you're an employee. So -- and that was probably the #1 method of how data got transferred in the mid-market. So I just -- that's not coming back. And it's just how fast can we move everybody into the new way to use a product, I think is where we're at right now.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#23

Great. I do want to come back to the product and DDX specifically. But maybe before we go there, we can talk about the success in your advertising spend because that is something that you've done a lot more of this year and timely because if I recall correctly, you started the advertising program and ahead of the pandemic. But sort of how successful has that been? How are you going to view advertising for the rest of this year? And kind of how are you measuring its success in terms of efficiency and things like that?

Chad Richison

executive
#24

Yes. Well, every week, we measure it by a number of leads that came in and number of appointments we've set with those leads, and we already know what our close ratio is on an appointment that's set. And so that's how we track it. I've pulled back on advertising before and watch them drop. I've tried to spend more and watch them not go up as much. So there -- you get to a point of diminishing return on an advertising spend. You really try to hit that sweet spot. And there's more than just television. I mean you have digital, you have SEO, and you have some other opportunities there. But we have had a strong spend, and I think, primarily, that's because we just have it in the past. It's strong spend compared to a very somewhat anemic spend as it relates to advertising in the past. Now we've had pockets of advertising spend. You mentioned that we started this early this year. We actually talked about the leads it was generating earlier this year. And then it was about 2 years ago toward the fourth quarter, it may have been 2018, maybe 2017, Craig might chime in on that.

Craig Boelte

executive
#25

'18.

Chad Richison

executive
#26

'18, we did another spend that quarter. We were advertising a little bit different way, had some success then. But we haven't had this success -- even earlier this year, we haven't had the success with our advertising spend that we're having now. And I think that's because of the differentiation and the fact that the value proposition is resonating because it's just logical. It's 2020. Employees should be inputting and retrieving their own data. I mean how long are we going to wait?

Daniel Jester

analyst
#27

Yes. When you decided to do this latest round of sort of more aggressive advertising earlier this year, was there a specific reason why now was the time that you wanted to do that?

Chad Richison

executive
#28

You mean this year, or you mean...

Daniel Jester

analyst
#29

Yes, this year, like yes, in 2020. Yes.

Chad Richison

executive
#30

Well, yes. Well, because we had the DDX out there, we were advertising a different way to use a product. If we were just advertising buy Paycom, here's our price, have fun kind of deal, I don't know that we would have spent that money. But we were really, if you watch our ads, we are showing a different user than what's traditionally been shown in this type of advertising. And so once we had the product and we had the measurement, we had the value proposition, it was important for us to advertise it. And that advertising doesn't just impact from us from a prospect basis, although that's how we measure success, it also impacts us from a client basis. So we have client employees that watch that, we have clients that watch that. And I just think it's easier to move everyone over the bridge of usage when you have assets helping you drive that message.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#31

Great. So speaking of usage, maybe we can talk about the product a little bit. So DDX, it's, I guess, at this point, 15, 16 months out. Can you give us an update about sort of usage? I think you've talked about a couple of times over the quarters about how the usage there has been very strong. But has that continued through sort of the recession that we're in? And can you just talk about how DDX specifically has ramped?

Chad Richison

executive
#32

Yes. I mean usage is as strong today as it's ever been, stronger on overall average. New clients also are coming in with stronger usage. We shifted about 3 months ago to a full usage -- commitment to usage agreement with clients on all deals that come in. So as of today, when we bring in a deal or book a deal, we have that commitment for full employee usage. And so that's helped us continue to generate more usage. And then our expectations of what new clients start out as from a usage perspective have also continued to go up. And so if you think of DDX as having its own quota for Paycom internally, that continues to be increased month after month as we continue to both incentivize through the cost that the DDX calculates as well as influence as it being a good thing to do for their own business. We're getting more and more businesses that are just adopting it as a full usage strategy. And then they're able to hold it together with DDX because it somewhat tells on you if you're not doing it the correct way and rewards you if you are.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#33

When customers have usage issues where maybe people were using it and then all of a sudden, maybe you don't have a strong usage, are there tools that you provide to kind of help kind of reenergize that usage? Or like in that scenario, how would you help?

Chad Richison

executive
#34

Yes. Well, I can tell you this, most of the time that we have a dip like that, it's one item. Time card approvals, it's one item where you'll have managers that are used to going in and making changes on an employee's time card just because they've always had to. If they didn't -- if managers weren't doing that, it never would have been corrected in the past. But now there's just not a need to do that. The employee does that themselves. And so so much of it is just getting people out of some habits that they've had in the past, which they had to have because if they didn't do it in the past, it wouldn't have been correct. Now it's just not necessary for them to do that. So oftentimes, if we start to see a drop in usage once someone got there, it's typically 1 or 2 users. And usually, it's around that time card approval-type process. Because some things can wait a little bit, those are things that can't. And so you'll have someone maybe jump in and do that. And so as we go through processes, we identify what are the main areas where if somebody is going to kind of fall off the wagon a little bit, what area is that happening in. And that's kind of where we're seeing that more as it relates to 1 or 2 different activities that someone would do in the product.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#35

Great. And then another product that you've recently reduced -- released, Manager on-the-Go. Can you just -- I feel, again, very timely given some of these folks are not in the office. How is usage and demand for that relatively new product?

Chad Richison

executive
#36

Yes. So Manager on-the-Go was developed for the manager, obviously, and that's to keep the data flow moving and also instill more confidence in the manager. A Manager on-the-Go, still that manager would still not go in and actually input employee time or edit employee time cards or enroll an employee in a benefit. It's not made for that. It's made for the normal management approval processes that a manager would take. And by putting it in their hands, data is not waiting. I mean in a company where you have 5,000 employees, I mean, you could easily have 800 managers. And they're a part of some level of approval process, whether it's time-off request, whether it's a scheduling, whether it's limits on expenses, whether it's time cards, I mean, whether it's a talent management that's part of the review, salary reviews and what have you, you're having managers that are always a part of the data flow. And so by putting it in their hands with alerts and making it very easy for them to do something, even setting up configurations within their system where the system will do it for them on its own. And so by doing that, we're keeping the data flowing much quicker, which is very important when you're producing perfect payrolls. Point to make, in 6 -- last 6 weeks, we haven't processed one check that was incorrect, not one. Now we've been having one a week maybe even. We have -- it's called perfect payroll, you get to come to the perfect payroll meeting. So that's the type of thing that we're running through right now and by having more visibility at both the employee level as well as at the manager level. I mean with Paycom right now, we have a client -- we have employees that are approving their own check before it even goes to payroll. I mean pay period ends on a Friday, they approved their check, I mean, it's not -- hadn't gone to payroll yet. So there's a lot of things that we're able to do now because employees have visibility, managers have visibility, and the data is moving very quickly. And so that's an important thing. And so -- and Manager on-the-Go has allowed us to get there even further.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#37

And as you think about the product road map from here, without sharing any details, but can you just kind of -- how has this environment of digital transformation acceleration, people are out of the office, how has that changed your product road map and how you think about designing new tools and features for the platform? Or has it not changed it at all, and your road map is the road map and you're comfortable with it?

Chad Richison

executive
#38

Yes. I wouldn't say it's changed our road map. I definitely think it's confirmed our road map because the things we've been working on, we've been working on. We don't develop a product and then say, "Oh, well, that worked, what are we going to do next?" So you start with an end goal and then it's the products that you are seeing that help support where we're heading. And so both the app and Manager on-the-Go all support what we do next, which is continue to drive further automation within our product. There's a lot of things that can just be automated now with visibility. A lot of process, a lot more processes can be automated. And so we're focused on that, and then we'll continue to do that.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#39

Okay. And speaking of product, you get asked about this a lot, but it's been a bit. So like, how is your view on on-demand pay evolves, if it has evolved at all over the past couple of quarters?

Chad Richison

executive
#40

Yes. I mean well, on-demand pay, when you call something pay and it's calculated as pay for time worked, I mean, taxes are due. And so when it comes to providing daily pay options or someone getting the pay daily options to that, we can do that, but we're going to withhold taxes and pay taxes and run a payroll. If you're talking about more of the what I'm going to call the payday loan-type scenario, where they estimate a certain amount and you're given that amount for an interest rate/fee, and then it's reconciled on a later payroll date to be determined, whatever, I'm just -- first of all, we don't keep clients from using that. If someone can use our system, they can connect it to a service like that, it'll work. And our system will even calculate it up down to the penny at the minute right now with deductions and everything. So it's not a system limitation, and I would doubt it's a system limitation for any of our competitors either. It's more of a decision. And without a ruling from the IRS that says legal, I can't really tell my clients it's something that they should do right now. But again, if clients choose to do that, they can. As far as working on an option for that, I can't say we've lost one deal because of that. I'm not seeing a lot of people call us and demand. Even our competitors who were talking it up, if you start talking to them now, it's -- we've got a few deals that use it. So I'm not 100% sure it ever really took off the way people thought. But to the extent it becomes a thing, we'll have a solution for that. We'll do it in an economical way for the employee. And we'll make sure that the taxes are filed and deposited correctly at the appropriate time with the appropriate deposit authority to make sure that the business doesn't get in trouble.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#41

Got you. So we have 2 questions here from investors. So first one is can you remind us, in your revenue guidance for the third quarter, what are your assumptions in terms of macro employment, flat or recovery? Or any kind of commentary on that?

Chad Richison

executive
#42

Yes. We separated from the macro in the last call when I said, well, we gave directional. Now we know exactly the impact is between $1.95 million and $2 million a week. That's the exact impact on our revenue. And so on the last call, I said, I don't expect that to improve until we have some meaningful results on something. I mean I think it would be unrealistic. What's the catalyst for improvement? Now we're talking about of our current client base. Does that mean there aren't companies that are starting businesses and other? Yes, but I'm just talking about it, our current client base. And so as I said, we've established a new baseline for growth. To the extent our current clients start hiring back employees because their situation has changed and they're in a position where they can do that, then we'll get some tailwind, organic tailwind without a lot of work there. But I also don't know that we necessarily have to have that. Well, we don't have to have that. We needed stabilization, we have that right now. And so from here -- and we're also having accelerating sales. So it's kind of a double-edged sword where on one side, you've got it hurting your current client revenue, but the other, it's helping you. So at the end of the day, the trade-off might actually be very positive for us, and that's the way it's looking right now. Again, not trying to minimize the fact that we're in a pandemic and people are passing away. That's terrible, and we would wish that didn't happen. But it is what we're feeling right now. And we're making lemonade where we can, and it's working for us.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#43

Okay. And then on the margin profile of the business, if you go back to 2019, I think your EBITDA margins were 42% or 43%. And 2019 was -- you had higher interest rates. You had strong client growth. You didn't have this incremental advertising spend. So I guess the question is, in a normalized economy, is that 42%, 43% EBITDA margin, is that attainable again? Or do you need to have more things sort of outside of your control like interest rates, et cetera, kind of to get back to that margin profile?

Chad Richison

executive
#44

Craig, I mean, I'll let you then I'll jump in.

Craig Boelte

executive
#45

Yes. No, I mean, we've been a high-margin company really from the beginning. And it's something -- we really haven't pulled any levers to try to increase our margins. We're growth focused. The advertising that we're spending right now is we're in the process of capturing new logos. We -- as you mentioned, we did have some impacts from the interest rates going down as well as when you think about our current clients that are processing less employees, that's going to have an impact. But as we continue to bring on business, we would expect it to be at similar levels at some point and that we continue to look for efficiencies throughout our organization as well. As we mentioned on our last call, our number of service professionals at the end of 2019 was the same as 2018. So the pandemic -- we were already looking for efficiencies. And I think the pandemic, we've also seen some efficiencies in -- like our R&D group as well as, as Chad mentioned, on our sales process as well as our service professionals. So we'll continue to look for efficiencies in moving forward.

Chad Richison

executive
#46

So yes, I was just saying, absolutely, the answer to your question, I mean, is it attainable? I mean absolutely, it's timing at this point. We needed stabilization. We have it. We can grow from here. I mean you establish a new base aligned for growth. And I mean if our clients don't add one employee back, we can grow from here because of what we're doing on the new business sales side. That's not to say I do believe at some point, our clients will -- hotels will open in mass, restaurants. People will start traveling eventually. Transportation will start moving. So I mean, I think eventually, you'll have -- you will have things. But I don't think it's going to happen overnight. I think it will be a trickle, that things will continue to improve. And then one day we'll wake up and we'll be like, "Hey, look, most everything is back to normal." So we now...

Daniel Jester

analyst
#47

Hope that day comes soon.

Chad Richison

executive
#48

But in between that -- but regardless, I should say, regardless that, with stabilization, we can absolutely attain the level of margins and growth opportunities that we've had in the past. But you've got to do the work. And so that's what we're focused on right now.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#49

All right. So then just last question from me. I just -- I guess over the next kind of 6 to 12 months, any key milestones that investors should be looking out for? Maybe just give us a little bit of a teaser in terms of kind of what we should be thinking about from the Paycom story over the next couple of quarters.

Chad Richison

executive
#50

I mean it's going to be more of the same for us. We continue to double down on this, what we think is appropriate usage. I mean it's kind of like you think of all the banks. If all the banks are going around trying to get people to use online banking instead of walking into the teller, that's pretty much what we're doing. So how successful are we going to be with that? I mean we'll see. But -- so that's really what we're focused on. We have a huge opportunity. And the more product and automation that we continue to put in the stack, the more leads we continue to generate, the more referrals that come our way from people who use our product. They experience the differentiation, their employees experience the differentiation and become more productive. And so I think that's going to continue to produce success for us in the future, plus allow us to develop even more product, which we're focused on.

Daniel Jester

analyst
#51

Great. All right. Well, Chad, Craig, appreciate both of your time today. Great conversation, and I look forward to speaking to you again soon. So again, thank you very much.

Chad Richison

executive
#52

Thanks, Dan, and take care.

Craig Boelte

executive
#53

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Paycom Software, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Paycom Software, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.