PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 12, 2026

NYSE US Consumer Discretionary Automobile Components conference_presentation 43 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Brian Willer

analyst
#1

Good morning. Thank you, PHINIA, for joining us at our Chicago Industrial Summit. We're excited to have Brady Ericson, Chris Gropp with us today. Thank you. [indiscernible] side, we got some prepared slides, They have got some slides [indiscernible] kick off from that, then we'll go to Q&A. We want this to be as interactive or good as possible. So thank you for joining us here again. And with that, I'll let you kick off on the slides.

Brady Ericson

executive
#2

Great. Thanks, Brian, and thanks, everyone, for joining. We'll flip through a couple of quick slides here kind of give you a quick overview of the company and our strategy and then go from there. First up, it's how we go to market is through product leadership. We continue to try to ensure that we have some of the best products that provide the greatest value to our customers. And we think we've got strong positions in all the product lines that we're participating in, whether it's fuel injection, starters and alternators, and aftermarket businesses. And we're leveraging a lot of that capability. And so we're not just -- we're not a what we consider a commodity. We try to win on our technology and our performance of our products. We go to market and we actually service all a bunch of different markets out there, and that's why we can really consider it more of a diversified industrial because of the variety of end markets that we serve. We then couple that with a lot of our financial discipline. We evaluate every single quote that we have out there, expectations on return on invested capital, our minimum hurdle rate is 15% is what we expect to deliver on any of our new programs and continue to drive that as part of our business. And then all of our decisions are really around how do we maximize shareholder return. And that's where our financial discipline and stable growth, our capitalization strategies is really going to shine through is where we're focusing on that shareholder return. When we talk about the diversity, I think this slide here really kind of goes through a lot of our strategy. Not only do we have diversity around the regions. We also have diversity in our customer base. Our top 5 make up 37%, our top 1 is in the high teens, 16%, 17%, 2 through 5 are all in the mid-single digits. So we have a lot of diversity in our customer base. And then finally, as I mentioned, a real diversity in our end markets, service, which will include original equipment service as well as independent aftermarket makes up 35% of our revenue. So that's actually the largest end market that we serve. That's followed by light passenger vehicle at 25%, medium- and heavy-duty on-highway commercial vehicle of 15%, light commercial vehicle at 19%. And then probably our fastest-growing segment is the off-highway industrial and other that will include the air based, gensets, the ag, the construction. And people will ask us a lot about going into all these different end markets. What's interesting for us, it's really the same engineers and the same manufacturing equipment. And so for us, we're able to leverage our human capital and our manufacturing capital to go to these different end markets. So we're not having to invest a bunch of money now in the hope of delivering additional revenue and profitability later because we're able to repurpose a lot of our existing lines. And so there's actually a light passenger vehicle diesel line that we repurposed to do some of the aerospace work because the processes, the material, the precision machining, the final assembly of the test is all similar. And the same thing with the engineers. We're not converting mechanical engineers and trying to have them do power electronics. We're having mechanical engineers, and it's a pre and post injector for a turbine engine. So it's fluid management. It's precision engineering. And so it's the same engineers that we have on aerospace, commercial vehicle and light vehicle because it's the same basic technology. It's just different flow rates, different pressures. And so we're able to shift our resources depending on where the growth is coming. And that's, in our view, is going to deliver a consistent growth rate and make us very resilient in a relatively volatile market. We did just recently announced the acquisition of stoba here at the end of June, gave a little bit of more insight in our latest earnings calls. And you'll see here, we see it as consistent with our strategy. It's going to add another aerospace and defense certified location in Germany, very precision machine components and they have a lot of intellectual property and trade secrets on how they manufacture the products, the type tolerances that they're holding. They are one of our largest suppliers and a critical supplier for us. And although their third-party or total revenues are about $200 million, $120 million, that was to us. So we see that as a not only as a way to get some critical technology inside, but also make our supply base a little bit more resilient, as we've seen in many of the European supply base and others, there's a lot of concerns with the financial viability. And so these small- to mid-sized companies are concerned. And so we saw this as an opportunity to not only expand our exposure into aerospace and into different customers, but also to solidify our supply base as well. And so we think it was a fair multiple at 6x EBITDA. We think that will just nicely kind of slide right into our organization. Their plants are close to our plants as well, and it gives us some ability to continue to optimize their manufacturing footprint with ours as well. Just a quick highlight. We did report earnings a few weeks ago as well, another good solid quarter, $130 million of EBITDA, $940 million of sales, another strong sales quarter for us year-over-year growth versus prior year. EPS continuing, I think, it was up around 20% adjusted EBITDA from prior year. We continue to maintain a strong balance sheet share repurchases continue even with the acquisition that's coming. And our leverage is pretty conservative at 1.3x. Our target is around 1.5. So we have a little bit of room there as well. And again, the 1.5 plus or minus, we think, is a good level right now. As we shared at the Investor Day as we continue to grow and as we continue to get our interest rates may be a little bit lower, maybe we go from 1.5 to 2, but we still want to maintain a relatively conservative balance sheet. We're not going to be levering up to 3x. And what we consider excessive because there are always going to be some cycles that we have to weather. I think this is, I think, a nice summary of our discipline and financial discipline and capital allocation discipline. Since we've spun, we just had our third anniversary back in early July. And in that time, we bought back close to 24% of our shares, returned $665 million to shareholders. We've increased our dividend. We established a dividend and increased our dividend twice already, maintain good leverage. We produce predominantly in low-cost countries. We've seen some nice organic growth rate and also now with SEM acquisition integration last year and now the stoba acquisition, we're finding those nice little tuck-in at reasonable prices that continue to support our business kind of longer term. So we think this is a really strong slide for us on how we have a good, strong foundation. We're investing for the future growth. We're disciplined in that area. And again, I think some of our capital return to shareholders has also been extremely strong over that period. And that thing kind of leads into kind of what our overall expectations are what has been for the decade, through the cycles, we'll see that average organic growth rate in that 2% to 4%. I think this year, we're right around 3%, 3.5% this year. Cash flow continues to remain strong. We still have some opportunities to continue to grow EBITDA, and we expect that to be solid in the 14% to 15% range. And then that target modest leverage at 1.5x. So I think if you take a look at what we've delivered over the last 3 years, I think it's -- our goal is to be consistent kind of in the ups and downs even with commercial vehicle market being really pretty heavy over the last couple of years, we still kind of held our numbers are relatively flat to maybe a little bit up, continue to deliver good, strong cash flows, and that's one of the benefits of the diversity of our -- of the markets that we serve. There's no one market that's going to really drive our one platform that's going to drive our revenues. And so I know people are more excited about light vehicle or more around CV. But again, CV is still only -- medium-heavy-duty CV still only 15% of our revenue. So yes, we'll see a little bit of uptick there. We're seeing a little bit of headwind in light passenger vehicle in China. India is now really kind of ramping up, and we're building a new plant there as well to support that growth. Alternative fuels is really growing well, whether it's natural gas, ethanol, methanol, both light vehicle and commercial vehicle, hydrogen as well. We think there's a lot of opportunities for us to continue to grow in these different markets and different regions of the world. So with that I'll pass it back to you, Brian.

Brian Willer

analyst
#3

Good. Thank you taking us through that Brady. Just some questions you get started as the Q&A session. You talked a lot about diversity of end markets and come here. So when you think about that end market exposures, it continues to evolve -- we talk about kind of the industrial aspects of that and again, getting away from -- and industrial, excess industrial state, but also on highway, on-highway from a commercial vehicle standpoint, other than [indiscernible] and then aftermarket. And as you position that from like kind of core growth and margin engine for the company. Talk about that just organically and inorganically as we should take it forward.

Brady Ericson

executive
#4

Yes. I mean, we're going to be disciplined on the inorganic. And so are we looking for opportunities on the aftermarket side from an acquisition standpoint? Absolutely. It's got to be at the right multiple and fit with our portfolio. From an organic standpoint, we expect our Aftermarket and our Service business to grow from roughly 35% to probably closer to 40% organically between now and the end of the decade. And so -- and that's primarily made up of kind of 3 major components. One, as we were talking earlier, the average age of vehicles continues to increase. The number of vehicles in operation continues to increase and as long as people are driving, our Aftermarket in general, the market itself is growing 1% to 2% a year. So that's just the overall market. Pricing is generally 1% to 2% a year on average as well. And then we've been kind of continuing to gain a little bit of market share as we continue to diversify our product portfolio and our offerings that's another 1% to 2%. And so that's where we see our Aftermarket in that 3% to 6%, 4% to 6% type of growth rate. And so if we continue to grow that, that's going to allow us to increase our Service and our Aftermarket business as a percent of sales. If you take a look at our recent earnings, our Aftermarket segment is already delivering roughly half of our profits. And so although the revenues may be a little bit lower, it's already about half of our profitability. The Aftermarket segment, I think we were just right around 17%, 17.1%, I think, in the quarter. It's a good solid number for our Aftermarket segment and our Fuel Systems is right around 11%. So our goal has always been for Fuel Systems to stay double digit. Hopefully, the new floor is around 11%. Aftermarket was, hey, at 15%, maybe 16% is now kind of the new floor, and continue to grow the business. And so we see these as real strong businesses, very profitable businesses and ones that deliver great cash flow, too.

Brian Willer

analyst
#5

And you push further on the industrial front. The great thing is that the industrial aftermarket tends to be more profitable and stickier.

Brady Ericson

executive
#6

Yes. If you -- I mean, if you look at the numbers, our Aftermarket as a segment, half of our -- of that 35% is more on the heavy truck and the other half is on the light passenger side. So I absolutely agree with you. On the commercial vehicle side, we may get 2 to 4 replacements over its life cycle. We're on a light passenger vehicle we may get 1 to 2. And so we do see a much larger just because of the miles driven and the severity of some of those applications that we tend to get more service parts over the life of the vehicle.

Brian Willer

analyst
#7

Just a little bit more on the Aftermarket side. When you think about just key operational levers there, the SKU expansion, brand conquest wins, what else is helping drive the outperformance there?

Brady Ericson

executive
#8

Well, I think the SKU is the overarching. But as we do this, we've continued to add different product lines into different regions. And we're doing it in a disciplined manner to where we'll launch it in one region, we get penetration, see if we can get some success in there. if it continues to grow well, we'll then take it to other regions. So steering, suspension, breaking was one of those things that has really been growing well for us. And now we're taking it to kind of all markets. I think having the OE pedigree and the quality, I think, also helps us. So we're definitely the premium product. And people know the DELPHI brand. The DELPHI brand is probably one of the top 5 -- in the top 5 brands out there in the aftermarket that people recognize it they appreciate it and they're willing to pay a premium for it because they know it's a good quality product. And so we leverage that. And the nice thing about the DELPHI brand is at some point, they probably made about every single component in the vehicle. So we have the flexibility to go into those different areas, apply the DELPHI brand to it, and really get a premium for that product and actually helping a lot of the mechanics and the shops. They put that DELPHI brand, they can sell the DELPHI brand easy. And they make more money because they're doing a markup on our product. And so a markup on $50 is not as good as a markup on $70. And so they actually make more money. And again, with many of our components labor is actually the bigger component. And when you start tearing apart the engine, if you see in some of the labor rates in some of these shops, they're probably going to spend more time and labor the than doing parts. And so they're going to want to ensure that they put the best quality parts on it. And so they're not going to go with a cheaper brand just to save a few bucks because if something goes -- if the mechanic is putting it on if something goes wrong, they're on the hook for their labor to replace it for the customer. And so that's where they really know they can rely on the DELPHI product and the brand, and they can easily upsell their customers to get the higher quality part.

Chris Gropp

executive
#9

And there's a similar dynamic on the DELCO REMY on the CV side, where you're literally spec-ed in by the fleets to sell the DELCO REMY. So whichever brands you're going with, whether it's DELPHI, which can go across both the CV and the light vehicle and the light commercial and you have the DELCO REMY, that's more skewed towards the CV side also [indiscernible] adds.

Brian Willer

analyst
#10

Any questions? I don't want to monopolize. I can keep going.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#11

[indiscernible]

Brady Ericson

executive
#12

I don't think they necessarily will I want to get solidly into 14, 15 before I make a commitment to go 15, 16. That's probably more of the rationale behind it because it's -- the EBITDA aren't that much different, when we talk about the 17, that's operating income. There's not a lot of depreciation in the Aftermarket segment. So it only has maybe 1 or 2 where it's 4 to 5 on the Fuel Systems side. So the Fuel Systems is not that much different. It's only a few points less. But I think in general, as we continue to grow as we continue to expand into the off-highway industrial and some of the aerospace business. I think that will then allow us to kind of take that margin up a bit kind of going forward. It's really small. We launched our first program with [ Safran ] earlier this year. The second one launched in Q2. Third one launches?

Chris Gropp

executive
#13

In '27.

Brady Ericson

executive
#14

Yes. And then the fourth one, I think, is end of '27 as well. So that's kind of -- it's something we been working on for about 4 or 5 years now. our facility in France got their aerospace quality certification in Q4 of last year. And now we've been going to a lot of the air shows and now that we have a big customer credible customer and with our quality certifications. The doors are really starting to open up. There's probably a dozen programs that we're currently quoting on right now on supplying prototypes for. And then the stoba acquisition will add -- they have a number of aerospace, they have an aerospace certified location as well as well as customers that we aren't in right now. And so that will open up some more doors for us as well.

Brian Willer

analyst
#15

The key theme of conference is obviously how to build out a data center footprint in terms of what's there. Can you talk a little bit more about -- think about what fines doing of stationary power generation side of things. industrial applications, some of that lineage, you just talked about DELCO REMY [indiscernible] standpoint, the alternative fuel research that the team has been doing, how you're able to kind of capitalize on that macro.

Brady Ericson

executive
#16

Yes. Yes. I think some people kind of, I think, overhype the data center side of things if we're doing generators. I mean we work with the cats, we work with the [indiscernible], we work with a lot of the genset providers. But the genset market in totality is now increasing, but it's not doubling in size. Certain applications are doubling, but the volumes are still relatively small. We've been on gensets for 30, 40 years, whether it's [ Cat Perkins ], whether it's [indiscernible] others. And so yes, we do see some increase in it, but it's still a relatively small percentage of our overall business. Now what we can't say that the genset is going to a data center because it's just a genset. It could be going to a factory. It could be going to a hospital. And so really, what we know is, hey, it's a 20-liter genset, it runs on natural gas and is a design for prime power backup power. And so that's what we supply our parts to. And in general, our parts are going to be the same, whether it goes to a data center or whether it goes to a hospital or a factory. So we are seeing some tailwinds. We saw some tailwinds in gensets business a number of years ago when they were building out 5G towers. They needed a bunch of gensets backup power for the 5G towers, and we had a big surge in our genset business for a few years, and it came back down again in a cyclical market. I think with the data centers and some of that demand rather than being a cyclical business, I think it's going to turn into more of a consistent long-term growing business. And we do think there's opportunities there. The SEM acquisition is one of them that is benefiting from that because a lot of their ignition coils is for natural gas applications. And that's where a lot of these large prime power are going to be on natural gas. And so we do see some opportunities there as well.

Brian Willer

analyst
#17

Just picking up on the stoba acquisition, again, [indiscernible] the exposure on both off-highway and industrial, as you mentioned. As you think about just taking that and then first, the existing relationships you have in them, but how does that best further accelerate what you're doing into not about in terms of those industry. You talked about aerospace supply chain in terms of enhancing that...

Brady Ericson

executive
#18

Well, I think it opens doors to customers that we've been trying to knock on and haven't been able to get into. And so they're already working with [ Lever ] and [ Woodward ] and [indiscernible], and a number of different customers that we're not in right now. And so it's going to open up some doors there. with the build-out with the military spending increasing in Europe, having a certified location in France having a certified location in Germany we have locations that are working on the certification in the U.K. We think we're going to be well positioned to support those customers. And as people know, the military sector and the aerospace sector, not the best at managing their supply base, and there's a lot of challenges. And so us going in there, the doors have been kind of wide open. They're excited about it. Their main concern was always can you guys -- you understand our lower volumes. And we say, yes, we're doing gensets. We're doing off-highway. We're doing marine already. We know the low volumes, and we can support it. And as we're continuing to build a strong relationship with the customers, they're giving us more and more opportunities. And if you think about some of the manufacturing processes around the components in our fuel injection, we're talking about plus or minus 0.5 micron. We're talking about pressures in our injection systems that are in excess of 40,000 PSI close to 3,000 bar. Laser ablation, laser drilling, EDM drilling, the micron, the shapes that we're controlling the aerospace specs that we have are quite easy compared to what we're doing on commercial vehicle diesel injectors. So the capability, the types of materials we're using the super alloys, it fits directly in with our capabilities. And that's why it was easy for us to win these first couple of programs, one is a pre-injector, one post-injector for [ Turbinengine ]. For us, it was the same basic machining, assembly lines, and we're able to convert an existing line. And that's why we think this is a -- it's an area that we can we can shift into and allocate additional resources to without having to increase our CapEx without having to increase our R&D as a percent of sales and we're leveraging our same existing human capital as well, so we can move them from commercial vehicle to aerospace. And I think another couple of good examples of that is we also converted one of our light vehicle diesel lines because, obviously, Europe light vehicle diesel kind of went off a cliff. We actually converted -- we have a GDI for diesel. And so we actually converted one of our GDI lines for diesel applications for coal or for an off-highway application. We've converted some of those diesel lines down for South America and other locations. So now we're 100% ethanol applications. South America seems to be going more that way. You've heard a lot of different new business wins in natural gas in India. India is going heavily into natural gas, both light vehicle and commercial vehicle. So we're moving lines down there as well. And so what's nice about it, not only do we have flexibility on our human capital, but a lot of our manufacturing lines, one we can convert from gas to diesel and we can easily move them from Europe to South America or Europe to China, China to Mexico depending on where the demand is. So these are things that we can move capacity around where extended as well.

Brian Willer

analyst
#19

And just picking up on what you're hitting on from a nat gas standpoint. I mean, that fits into just some of what your capital is on in terms of alternative [indiscernible] in core markets. [indiscernible] different chapters share, ethanol, methanol, hydrogen, and can you talk about how you're being able to capitalize on that opportunity.

Brady Ericson

executive
#20

Well, again, it's -- from an engineering standpoint, it's just a different viscosity and different flow rates and pressures. And so you just have to make some slight -- whether it's nitriding, whether it's a coating, whether it's a diameter, you got to open up a lot more flow. It's the same basic technology. And so we were -- probably a few years ago, we were probably people were more excited about hydrogen. And so we're investing a little bit more there. I think the excitement has kind of leveled off a little bit and I think there's still a lot of work going on there, but they're not the overhype. So we backed off a little bit, move some more of that to natural gas and some of the lessons learned that we had on hydrogen, we're able to apply to natural gas and ethanol applications. And so for us, every time we work with a different fluid, we learn some new things, and we can then apply some of those lessons learned to other applications as well, whether it's a different type of coating, nitriding, a flow rate, corrosion, I mean, obviously, 100% methanol is a very corrosive fuel to deal with. And so getting something to live with methanol over the life of the vehicle is a challenge. But obviously, we learn a lot and we can apply some of those lessons learned to other applications.

Chris Gropp

executive
#21

But the investment is the same. The capital equipment that it takes to produce those parts is the same. It's more in the materials themselves that our engineers have to work through and deal with. But it's the same engineers. And they understand and try to figure out the flow rates and how you work with the materials and as Brady said, the coatings and things. But the cost to get into those areas is approximately the same, and it doesn't take a big spike in spending to move to those alternative areas.

Brian Willer

analyst
#22

You let up your prepared comments about product. technology. And so at ACT Expo, you had introduced the first homologated [ H2 ICE LCB ]. Just again, product leadership, technology leadership. Can you just talk about how that's been able to leverage that with the OEMs and then looking for kind of that near zero emission combustion backwards.

Brady Ericson

executive
#23

Well, I think that's a great example of we're not just a component supplier. We supply a complete system. And so we were able to convert on our own the complete vehicle from a diesel to hydrogen. -- the tanks, the safety systems, the homologation, the calibration, certified and everything else. And so that vehicle has been running around the U.S. now. And that's a good example of some of the influence we're having. We talked to [ CARB ] and the EPA 2, 3 years ago about hydrogen internal combustion that they want to talk to us. And because they were so focused on better electric and/or fuel cells and we kept talking to them and talking to them and they really started to say, "Hey, let's take a look at it. Maybe it has some value." And so they want to test it, and they were able to test the vehicle for a month and in their own labs to get their own feeling for it. So that's how we're starting to have some influence on the EPA and some other thinking. And then our customers will then come back to us and kind of say, "Hey, you got [ CARB ] to test the vehicle. Maybe we can work on some test fleets." And so we have a number of customers we're working with to do some demo fleets in different parts, whether it's buses, I think our CTO, Todd met with some of the transit authorities in California, where they're saying, hey, this battery electric buses aren't working for us. It can't last the full day. lose speed on some of the elevations and the Hill. They just -- it's not meeting their expectations. And so they're asking us saying, hey, would we be interested in doing some hydrogen nice demo fleets. And so I think that's where we see that coming to where I think we're going to be doing more and more kind of demo fleets. They're going to want to get 2 or 3 years of experience to see what the total cost of ownership is going to be, how they perform, does it meet their duty cycle requirements? And then I think it's probably going to be something more in the 2030s. Now with that said, I think we were just in LeMans as well, and they have -- the LeMans is now going to open up hydrogen for the 24 hours of LeMans, I think, in 2031. Formula 1 is now working with it. Trucks are working with it. We've got a hydrogen working on actually a tanker that there -- it's a diesel engine that they're supplementing with 10% hydrogen. And that's helping them reduce their emissions and improve things. And so we're supplying them with some technology as well on the injector side. So there's a lot of different things that are working on there with hydrogen, whether it's a mix, whether it's a blend, whether it's 100%. I think it's a very interesting solution, especially for the Western Hemisphere that doesn't have the battery infrastructure. And so whether it's Europe or North America OEMs, they're probably some of the leaders in combustion technology. And so it'd be a lot smarter if they just replace the fuel and keep the leadership in combustion technology, keep all those engine plants, keep all the mechanics that know how to repair these things in place rather than going to a better electric that they're way behind. They're going to lose. They're 20 years behind or 10 years behind. The Chinese and their technology and their vertical integrations they have. I think it's going to be very difficult for the Western OEMs to compete.

Brian Willer

analyst
#24

I have some final questions around kind of capital allocation, but I just want to go back to the group for any follow-up questions.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#25

[indiscernible] the question that I have is what's changing with this net vehicles where we need more of a commercial viable technology. Is that something that the new work progress or...

Brady Ericson

executive
#26

Yes. I mean the fuel cells, I don't think is a bridge technology. I think they were hope -- they thought that was going to be the solution. And I think a lot of the fleets have struggled with the performance of the fuel cell, the liability of the fuel cell -- looking at, hey, I need a Class 6 or Class 7 truck, but to get the power that they need, they got to go to our Class 8. It just didn't make sense. I think the other challenge with fuel cells is that they require liquefied hydrogen and very pure hydrogen. And if you don't have pure, you can damage the fuel cell and it becomes an issue. The nice thing about hydrogen ICE is we can handle the contaminants, we don't need it to be in a liquefied form. It can be in a [ gasious ] form. If they want to transport it via piping or by pipe, no problem. Fuel cells can't because it picks up a little bit of contaminants along the way in the pipes. And so it becomes a challenge. And so we've actually worked with the fuel standards organization to come up with a new grade of hydrogen that can have some contaminants in it, and that should hopefully also lower the cost of the hydrogen because that's one of the bigger challenges the cost of hydrogen right now and to get to that purity level. And so we're saying, hey, for hydrogen ICE, we don't need that purity. So that could probably almost cut the cost in half over time versus the pure version because you don't have the storage cost, you don't have to keep it in a cryogenic state. You can pipe it, you can truck it, you can store it in more reasonable applications. And so our view is that a hydrogen ICE is a more robust solution. I think the fuel cells make sense if you're in space or you're in a in a data center that's a very controlled environment. But once you go on the road and go into trucking, and I mean, we can't get biodiesel consistency across the country that causes issue. That's what these vehicles have to deal with. And so you're not going to get the purity of hydrogen, you have to assume that everything is going to be perfect once it goes out in the field, and that's what they ran into with the fuel cells.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#27

[indiscernible]

Brady Ericson

executive
#28

For us, it's relatively applicable. Again, we're in production with [ JCB ] with hydrogen. And again, it's using the same basic technology. It's either going to be a version of our port fuel injector, if they're going low pressure. And if they're going higher pressure, they're basically using a GDI or direct injection. 300bar, 350bar type injectors. So for us, again, it's not any different from an R&D. And so we've been supporting for the last 5 years, hydrogen, ammonia, methanol, ethanol, natural gas, all those things is already in our numbers. So we've been doing it. So we don't see any need to have to, hey, we need to increase R&D and other percent of revenue in order to meet this. And so -- and in general, in a lot of these applications, we're getting a lot of either government and/or customer funding to support it as well.

Chris Gropp

executive
#29

So you can meet the emissions level, but you don't have to go to some extreme. So we've had to say, since coming out 3 years ago, combustion is not the enemy. You can combust and still come back to a 0 emissions or very neutral emissions level product. So it's not combustion that's the enemy, and we know how to do that. And there's a lot of people out there it's a better technology, and you can get where you need to be without going crazy and spending piles of money.

Brady Ericson

executive
#30

And it's a practical solution too, because, again, we can convert them relatively easily. It's not crazy other than the tank is the biggest thing. But there's a lot of applications out there that are already natural gas, and they have the same kind of size tanks and packaging. And so from our standpoint, we think it's a very practical solution. We were joking at first, the EPA in [indiscernible], well, it's not 0 because it's a little bit of oil, that gets past the piston ring that will combust and it gives a little bit of CO2 a little bit of emissions. And we joked with them and kind of said, well, you know that guy sitting in the driver seat, he's spitting up more CO2 than it's coming off of tail pipe. So let's be a little bit practical. Let's be rational in the application. So I do think they're starting to be a little bit more rational and people are looking at it as an alternative. Do I see it significantly impacting our revenue this decade? No. But I do see it as a pathway of why combustion engines will probably have a lot longer life than people think.

Brian Willer

analyst
#31

Okay. Then capital allocation lines, you talked about leverage levels in terms of the target where you rate right now, balancing organic versus inorganic. Obviously, stoba is an attractive entry point as related to -- I think it's a to peak your word in terms of the purchase multiple. Obviously, as you talk about those long-term growth rates that target 3% to 6% that's all organic. And so organic going on top of that. But how do you balance continued investment for growth as you think about capital allocation relative to return on capital because you talked about repurchase and dividends as well.

Brady Ericson

executive
#32

Yes. I mean the first and foremost, is supporting our organic growth. And that's the R&D at 3% net CapEx at roughly 4. I think we're running maybe 3 million, 3.5 this year. So we're being disciplined on that side of it. When I say on the R&D, it's 3% net, but it's actually closer to 6% gross because we get about $100 million from customers for services development and government brands. So we're actually spending quite a bit on a pure R&D standpoint, and that's also a testament to the value that we provide. And so from -- that's kind of first and foremost. So next is then we've our dividend -- although our dividend [indiscernible] twice, it still stays around that [ $450 million ] that we allocate to dividends. And then from the rest of it, we'll take a look at our debt levels, we'll take a look at where our share price is, and we'll take a look at where some of the opportunities are. And so when we're taking a look at acquisitions versus share buybacks, we're going to look at it on the same where can we maximize shareholder returns. And acquisitions obviously bring more risk with it than investing in ourselves. And so when we took a look at both at SEM, we were trading maybe in the 6 to 7 range of enterprise value over EBITDA and we did SEM at 5x. And they actually have a longer-term growth rate. We actually saw a better growth rate than their business than ours. And so we thought, hey, it's lower than our multiple. They had a higher growth rate and they have good margin business that makes sense rather than buying back our shares. We're now trading 7-ish, 7, 7.5, still above 6, kind of a multiple. It was a vertical integration as well, relatively low risk. We knew their business opens up some aerospace and defense that maybe give us a little bit of a higher growth rate than our base growth rate, that made more sense. We're always going to take a look at it compared to our own share price. If we were trading at 5x [indiscernible] a lot more -- it makes a lot more sense just to buy back more shares because we think we're extremely undervalued. And so that's how we kind of take a look at it. And what we've seen even this year with stoba we can acquire stoba and still continue our pace of roughly $200 million in share buybacks and still be at 1.5x. So one doesn't prove the other either, because we are net debt went from, I think, [ 1.4 to 1.3 ] because we continue to grow our EBITDA. We continue to generate a lot of cash flow. So given that opportunity. And so we can do stoba, continue our share repurchases and still be at roughly 1.5x.

Brian Willer

analyst
#33

Look, I think highly accretive acquisitions like those that you've been able to identify and complete shown on the back end. That's obviously going to drive further credit in terms of the inorganic growth on top of the organic and tin, which is great. I trust that there's a ready pipeline in terms of what the team has looked.

Brady Ericson

executive
#34

Yes. I mean we've probably gone through 200 now, since we've spun. But again, there's probably 80%, 90% of them, we throw out right away. There's maybe 10, 20 of them that we dig in a little bit deeper. We've put in some initial offers on probably over a dozen, but then we're not going to chase them. This is what it's worth to us. And if they don't want to transact, they don't transact. I'd say probably less than half are for sale, too. So we're targeting different companies that we think would be a good fit as well, building relationships with them. That's what we did with stoba, that's what we did with SEM. They weren't for sale. These are ones that we developed relationships with. And so we continue to build relationships with companies we would like to integrate. We do look at some that are for sale as well. But again, we're going to remain disciplined in what we're willing to pay. But we're not going to chase it.

Brian Willer

analyst
#35

So I know you mentioned just having hit the third anniversary, but the reality, I mean, the background on this company goes back [indiscernible]. The point is that the relationships that you have -- that the team has with other players, et cetera, to see things that other people don't see, don't wait for processes to come to you go find them.

Brady Ericson

executive
#36

Yes. Exactly.

Brian Willer

analyst
#37

I don't have anything else unless there's other questions in the room to follow up.

Brady Ericson

executive
#38

Great. Thank you very much.

Chris Gropp

executive
#39

Thank you. Thanks, Brian.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete PHINIA Inc. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to PHINIA Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.