Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (PNE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 13, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood morning, and thank you for joining us on the Pine Cliff Energy Second Quarter webcast. We will open with remarks from President and CEO, Phil Hodge. Today, Mr. Hodge is joined by Chief Financial Officer, Kristopher Zack; Chief Operating Officer, Terry McNeill; and Vice President, Finance, Austin Nieuwdorp. Questions for the management team can be registered online during the webcast. Prior to starting, we would like to remind participants that the call may contain comments on or discussion of forward-looking information. As such, we refer participants to the cautionary statements on forward-looking information included in the presentation on our website, www.pinecliffenergy.com. With that, we'll turn the call over to Phil Hodge, President and CEO.
Philip Hodge
executiveThanks, Chris. Good morning, everybody. As we've done in the past, we're not going to bother to read the press release or kind of give kind of scripted answers. We've had lots of questions. So thank you very much. A lot of people that might be listening get our quarterly update that I do. And that's stimulated a bunch of different questions, kind of more around the macro on natural gas and what's happening, and we're happy to address those. So I think we'll get to those pretty quick.
Philip Hodge
executiveI think the -- just on a summary on the quarter, it was the -- a case of natural gas prices being much better than last year, but still not at the level that we would like to see them at. I guess maybe we always want to see them higher. But it is -- I think a big reason for that is around the LNG, then we've had LNG Canada on now for a year, but it's not been a consistent draw on the system. And that's been -- that was problematic in July and August, which is when storage levels started to rise again because LNG Canada Phase 1 wasn't at its full capacity. We're starting to see indications again that it's heading back to full capacity like it was in June when it set export records for Canada for LNG. So ideally, you're wanting to see the tanker leaving every couple of days out of LNG Canada Phase 1. And that hasn't been the case for the last 6 or 7 weeks. But the 2 things we watch pretty closely is the -- we watch the draws coming out of the Willow Valley and the Sunset Creek, and I don't want to get too technical. But for those of you who are interested, just send me an e-mail afterwards, and I'll send you the link. The TC Energy has got a public website availability that you could actually see when Willow Valley is drawing. What that means is if Willow Valley has got gas flowing through it, that means that they're drawing off the NOVA system. And therefore, natural gas is going to Kitimat, which is where the site for LNG Canada is. That's not always the case. When it's at lower than full capacity or even lower than mid capacity, so if it's under 1 Bcf a day of exports, they tend to just be using gas directly from the producers that own LNG Canada and therefore, not drawing gas off the system. So we really watch that closely because as they ramp up their capacity, they then start to draw off the system. And then that impacts the rest of the entire natural gas infrastructure because you're now pulling gas off that otherwise would be going into a crowded system and a crowded storage system. So you can really see that -- if you look at the storage for the last summer, you really saw it in June because in June, LNG Canada was at pretty much full capacity. So they were almost -- they were like about 1.8 Bcf a day was what they were exporting. And you saw that storage then started to drop. And as long-time followers of the natural gas landscape know, storage is kind of the scoreboard as to what's happening between supply and demand. And so you do not want to see storage at its peak in the summer months because then there's a risk that there'll be nowhere to put gas storage in the shoulder season, which is typically kind of in that August, October period, which we're now into. It does -- right now, it doesn't look like we're going to have a full storage, which is good. LNG Canada is now, as of the last couple of days, Willow Valley started to show life again of gas pulling off. And so that's a good thing. So it's positive, which is why gas prices are well over $1 higher an Mcf in Western Canada than they were this time last year. So we're optimistic that things are turning the corner on that. And that's -- as I've mentioned before in these webcasts and in interviews, that 1.8 Bcf a day up to 2 Bcf a day, that's a big, big number when our entire country only produces 19 Bcf a day. So we're talking about 10% of all of our production coming on or off on demand. That's going to make a material swing. So that's something we're watching pretty closely. We had some questions about that. The -- one of the things we had -- another question was kind of just around our CapEx because we just announced the CapEx increase. This is something that shouldn't be a surprise to our shareholders or people that have been following us. We -- the Glauconite inventory that we picked up in the December '23 acquisition, we've been wanting to get after that -- those well locations for the -- ever since we've owned those assets. And that's been now 2 years. Now prices were weak, and therefore, prices are weak, we're very highly correlated to AECO pricing, and therefore, our cash flow weakened with the lower AECO prices. We got -- we managed to drill the well earlier this year. These wells are typically between $8 million and $9 million all in when you drill and you complete and you tie them in. And so we've got that one well, and I'll turn it over to Terry to talk about how it's doing. But this -- we wanted to get another well done this fall. And luckily, our cash flow has improved this summer, as we talked about, AECO has been a little bit stronger. WTI has definitely been stronger with the middle -- the Mid East crisis and war situation, we've seen that WTI rise, and that's had a big impact on us. I know we're definitely thought of as a natural gas producer as we should be since about 80% of our production is natural gas. But in the last quarter, more than 50% of our revenue actually came from liquids. And a big part of that was the 4-23 well from the Glauc. So maybe I'll pass it over to Terry to talk a little bit about the well results to date.
Terry McNeill
executiveSure. Thanks, Phil. Appreciate it. Yes, the 4-23 well came on in middle of February, was cleaning up sort of towards the end of February. It's been on pretty well continuously from March until right today despite some third-party maintenance going on in the quarter, but we've had it on almost 100% of the time. From a financial perspective, from March until June, so over that 4-month period, those are the latest financial reports -- financials we have, it's averaged 1,100 BOE a day. And it's pretty well flat month-to-month, and it's performing very, very well. It's quite -- it's in accordance with our type curve. It exceeds our engineering type curve. And I guess, more importantly, it's 50% gas, 50% liquid. So the liquid exposure makes a considerable difference to Pine Cliff. And the volumes do, too. I mean it's pretty well 5% of our corporate production. So it's a good well. We're excited. It's performing well, and we'd like to do more.
Philip Hodge
executiveYes. And that's a good segue, Terry. Thanks. We've got several questions here on kind of what is this -- what does our increased CapEx mean going forward? And that's a very legitimate question because we've got -- our goal would be to continue to exploit the Glauconite well inventory and frankly, our Pekisko well inventory as well. Let's not forget that we've got some really good drill locations in Pekisko. The Glauc is about over 50% of that production that comes on is liquids. And so that is why the economics go around very strongly. And you can -- I would direct you to our presentation on our website at www.pinecliffenergy.com, the -- you'll see kind of the economics of the wells and both from an internal rate of return and also from a payback standpoint. I mean, at these prices, even with the weaker AECO price, and with WTI prices being in and around that $75, $80 range, you've kind of got the NPV. In other words, the net present value of each one of those well locations is kind of that $8 million to $10 million range, and we've got 37 net locations to get at. So we're talking about $300 million to $350 million of inventory that's just sitting there. And this isn't high-risk inventory. This is inventory that's been very proven by a lot of well control in the area, and it's a very active area. So it's definitely something that we want to get to a pace of development where we're drilling at least kind of 2 to 4 wells a year. And it could be -- if in the proper pricing environment, maybe that gets accelerated even further or we throw in some Pekisko wells at the same time. So it's -- we don't -- at this level, we're not interested in issuing equity out at the current stock prices. We think things are going to get better on the AECO pricing for all the various reasons I set forth in the e-mail that many of you would have got. So we're looking to increase that pace of development. These wells pay out depending on the commodity price kind of in between that 12- and 15-month period. So they're very quick paybacks, but they continue to pay. As Terry mentioned, the 4-23 well has been surprisingly resilient. It's not -- it will show decline at some point, but it hasn't yet, even though it's been online for getting close to half a year. And then our 1-27 well, you may remember, was the well that we had when we first did the acquisition. We didn't drill it, but it came with the acquisition, but it just had come online. It's now in the stage of paying itself again, like in other words, it paid itself out. It's now for a second time. So then that's the attractiveness of these locations and why we want to get after those. But we got to do that prudently. We're not going to ramp up our debt to do it. We're not going to -- we have to do this within our cash flow. And we've got -- we'd like -- ideally, we'd like to probably even drill the second well of this fall along with this Glauc well. And if prices were to swing in our favor or if we were to do a transaction with -- we've had a lot of interest from people wanting to farm in on this area, we're kind of reluctant to do that because we really like the ownership position that we've established. But these are all things we look at all the time. There's different ways to finance kind of an accelerated drill program, and we've considered, I think, just about every one of them. So initially, we got enough cash flow. The Board of Directors approved us drilling another well this fall. Our goal would be to drill several -- again, that 2 to 4 range next year. If prices are stronger, then maybe we look at doing more. So it is exciting because these are -- this is an area that really does deserve to have capital allocated towards it. And then you've heard us speak about capital allocation before. I mean, we're very cognizant of the fact that our model lends itself to a free cash flow in rising commodity prices, especially on gas, but obviously also on oil. And so having a low-cost OpEx, having low G&A, having the low decline rate, all of those things help you generate more free cash flow. And so in a rising commodity environment, we've got that cash flow we can deploy as we see fit. Now the dividend, we've kept the dividend going through this entire period. We will -- the CapEx, I think right now, it makes more sense to allocate capital towards the drill program. And so that's what we've done for the remainder of the year. One of the other questions we've got was around kind of the -- one of the concerns out there, I think, for natural gas producers is the impact of the El Nino effect, which is a weather pattern that is projected to have a warmer winter for this winter -- sorry, warmer temperatures for this winter. Maybe I'll pass it over to Kris to chat about our hedging program.
Kristopher Zack
executiveYes. Thanks, Phil. So we continue to actively manage our hedge book with the view of reducing volatility in our price realizations. And I would say, as highlighted in the press release, I think you saw a continued evidence of that in our Q2 results, noting that our hedge and diversification strategy delivered a realized gas price of $2.38 an Mcf in Q2. That was a 47% premium to AECO 5A price of $1.62. And we're pretty well hedged for the balance of the year. We're about 41% for the balance of 2026 at $3.16, which is well above the market and so provides good cash flow support to our -- to the operations. While weather is hard to predict, it's certainly something that's considered in our thought process when we look and we think about our hedge program. If you look at Q4 through Q1, our gas -- our average hedge is about 36% of our production at around $3.10. So again, we've got a very good start on the winter, but we'll continue to potentially look to add more hedges where it makes sense on a go-forward basis.
Philip Hodge
executiveThanks, Kris. Another question we had was around the kind of the makeup of these Glauc wells from a liquids perspective. And one of the questions I got last night was how much wetter are these? In other words, what is the NGLs component of the wells? Maybe I'll flip that back over to Terry to discuss.
Terry McNeill
executiveSure. Thanks. With regards to the wetness of the location, I mean, it will vary from location to location. It gets a little bit drier as you go west from East. So -- but our concentrated land position, we're still trying to vet it out a little bit, but I don't think it's going to change appreciably across our land base. So I think we'll be fairly consistent on liquid production on our future wells as we are in our existing well. From a condensate versus NGL makeup, initially, the wells are about 20% to 25% condensate and NGL on the total BOE, and that will taper down over time. So the condensate value will come down over time. But initially, of the 1,100, we're about 20% to 25% condensate. And it is condensate, not oil.
Philip Hodge
executiveThanks, Terry. I think those who have been following our story for some time will recognize the fact that as these wells come on, each time they come on, it has an impact on, obviously, our liquids. And so we've gone from -- at one point, Pine Cliff was 96% natural gas weighted. And with the acquisitions that we've done over the last few years, starting in 2019, we did each of the AlphaBow, Apogee, Certus acquisitions, all kind of have added more liquids exposure. And clearly, this drilling inventory is definitely liquid exposure with the majority of it. And because of where AECO is at, it actually is even from a revenue and from a cash flow standpoint, it's even more than just the percentage of the volume and is well above its weight because of where WTI is these days. And as some of you may not be aware, WTI is very highly correlated to the condensate price that Terry mentioned. So quite often, condensate is actually even higher than WTI. When you've got the lower Canadian dollar like we do right now at $1.39, that even has a greater impact on kind of what the Canadian dollar impact for -- on to our balance sheet is. A few more questions here. The -- one of the questions was the -- asking us -- I'll just read it. It says that we've done 16 transactions in 14 years, and we haven't issued equity in 9 years, that's accurate. With the Shell-ARC deal, LNG Canada Phase 2 momentum and $22 billion of infrastructure announced in Q2, is the M&A environment starting to look interesting again? Or does the current strip suggest sellers are holding off? I think my own view is we're going to continue to see consolidation. And so the reference there is for those who aren't watching really closely, Shell, which is obviously one of the largest oil and gas producers in the world, just recently announced an acquisition of ARC Resources, which is West Canada as it was a $22 billion company, very heavily weighted towards natural gas and to condensate. I personally took that as a positive signal that foreign investors that can put capital anywhere they want in the world, were making significant investments into Western Canada and saw this environment as finally an environment that they could come back and deploy capital to. And that's not been the case for 10 years. We saw a lot of U.S. and international groups leaving the country from an investment standpoint. Now we're seeing a lot more interest of coming back to Canada. And I think that goes as a testament to the governments, both at the federal level and at the provincial level, welcoming back that foreign direct investment. And we really -- as a country, we really do need that foreign direct investment. We can't get the projects that we're talking about building, the pipelines across the country, the LNG facilities, all of these things need a tremendous amount of capital, frankly, more capital than our country has. So it's nice to see the foreign direct investment returning, and I think that one project, bringing it back down to a more -- a level for the juniors and for the intermediates in the space. The reality is that it's changed a lot in the last -- I've been at Pine Cliff now for 15 years. There was a lot more junior capital energy pools available. When I first started, I remember you go to different cities to do marketing and you would have a tremendous amount of interest and you would have days of meetings with different groups. The reality is that, that is not the case anymore. So you've got a smaller number of pure energy investors. You have a lot more generalist investors. And they, I believe, will come back to the natural gas and to the energy space when they see the return of capital being deployed and the free cash flow that's being generated. And that's already started. And I think that the -- everybody's balance sheets are in much better shape. There's a lot less companies in the sector, and I don't think that trend is going to stop. Part of it is as a junior company, and we're 20,000 BOE a day, that -- 10 years ago, that would have been considered a decent-sized intermediate. Now we'll be junior, smaller compared to the rest of the market. There's companies obviously smaller than us, but there's not a lot in the public domain that are smaller. And your regulatory costs, your just cost of doing business has gone up. That's just the reality. And so it's -- we continually look for assets that make sense or acquisitions or mergers that would make sense to us as shareholders. And that's -- I mean that's been the constant theme ever since we've started Pine Cliff. It's all about what -- how do we make the shares more valuable. And if a transaction has the potential to make that -- make our shares more valuable, then we're definitely interested in it. We haven't done a transaction -- a material transaction now in a couple of years, but that's not from lack of looking. I think there is -- when you get this volatility in commodity prices, it does make transactions more difficult. Like I said, we've done a lot of transactions, and our team has been involved at different places that they've worked and tremendous amount of transactions. You almost need a little bit of stability in commodity prices to help get transactions across the board because it's really difficult right now. For instance, on the oil price, when we've had this huge -- fairly big significant run-up in oil prices, what do you use for -- how do you value the assets? Do you use today's price of $83 -- or do you use next year's price where it's under $70? And that's -- so there's that spread that needs to be kind of negotiated. Natural gas is a bit more consistent. I mean it's -- I think on Western Canadian gas, it's a contango. In other words, prices are higher in the future. We think that strip is probably being conservative. We think that gas prices are going to be probably stronger than what current strip is at. But that's our view. And we hope to be able to add more assets. In the meantime, we'll grow organically. When we've got the kind of inventory that we are fortunate enough to have, that's a great place to allocate capital to. So hopefully, that answers that. The -- I did get a question about data centers in a couple of different capacities. One is an update on where we are and then just generally, what's the impact that it could have on Western Canada? It's -- we watch this very closely, and we've had a lot of conversations with a lot of different groups. And it's not just data centers. It also includes the cryptocurrency mining space because that's still very active and still what we kind of think of it simply as turning gas into power. And how they use that power? It can be used for different applications. What trend we are seeing? There's definitely -- and I mentioned this in my quarterly e-mail, is we're seeing a real push to go to distributed generation. And what I mean by that is where these power generation sites are not connected to the grid, and they're going to be set up very close to where their energy source is. And in the case of Alberta, that's going to be natural gas. There's the odd case where these data centers are being set up near nuclear or around the globe, they're quite often attached to coal. But in North America, the reality is that every time that we add more demand for electricity, we're increasing the demand for natural gas. The statistic that I often use when I talk to people in the U.S. and they don't realize that 43% of all of their electricity in the United States comes from natural gas. And second place is nuclear and coal, each in and around that 16% to 18% level. So it's pretty significant. And this goes to the same argument around electric vehicles. If you're going to be a shift towards electric vehicles, with this rise in WTI and oil pricing, that's become a topic again is what's going to happen with all electric vehicles. Again, that's great, but you're going to need more electricity. And so the power grid is going to come under pressure. And what we have seen in just about every jurisdiction is that almost nobody has got extra power. The grids have been kind of maintained at a level for decades. And now you're seeing this power surge and electricity demand surge and the grids are having to deal with it. That's where you're getting a lot of pushback from a lot of areas and jurisdictions around data centers because they're worried about their power bills going up. And that's a legitimate concern, which is again why there's a real trend towards people finding distributed power generation. And so there was a big announcement up in the Edmonton area, the biggest data center that will be built in Canada, close to 1 gigawatt size, but they're building right beside it a huge natural gas power facility. And so you see different projections as to how much natural gas demand might be impacted by the data centers. I've seen numbers, like kind of that 3 to 8 Bcf a day. That's a North American number, just to give everybody context, I mentioned the 19 Bcf a day is what the natural gas supply is in Western Canada, Canada essentially. It's about 107 right now Bcf a day in the U.S. But there's the 2 big demand sources besides the power grid that is really the LNG and then what these -- how many data centers are actually going to get built. And there's -- these projects just take on an immense amount of power demand. And therefore, if they're going to try to stay away from the grid, they're going to need a lot more natural gas. And so that's -- it has the potential to be pretty significant. Here in Alberta, I think it could be probably more like 1 to 2 Bcf a day, maybe as high as 3 Bcf a day depending on -- I mean, the Alberta's government has come out and said that they want to attract $100 billion of data center investment into the province. That's a big number. And we -- like I said -- but it is very real. We have multiple sites that we think would be very attractive to data center groups. We announced the one data center transaction. They continue to tell us that they're very close to getting financing. We are very hopeful that they'll get the financing and that we can move forward with the permitting of that site. But we also are talking to multiple groups about other sites and what we might be able to do. So it's kind of a -- it is not a tomorrow impact on natural gas prices in Western Canada. It's -- I think we'll start to see the impact of it probably starting next year. Some of these projects that have already started to break ground and get built. But I think you're really going to see it more in kind of '28, '29, which is interesting because that time frame is the exact same time that you're going to start to see more LNG demand. One of the questions was -- that we got here was -- is the Phase 2 of LNG Canada built into the AECO price? And I would say, no, I don't think it is because -- so Phase 2, for those of you who aren't familiar with the project, LNG Canada is in Kitimat BC. They have 2 trains for -- 4 trains today in Phase 1, and their plan is to do another 4 trains in Phase 2. Each phase is about 2 Bcf a day of exports. So they've got -- Phase 1 started exporting in July 1 of last year, and it's been ramping up, quite sporadic, but in June was at the highest we've ever seen it before. And then like I said, July and August it fell off again. And it looks like it's ramping back up for this fall, which is fantastic. The second phase, they've already started work on it, construction on the pipelines -- or sorry, on the adding compression to that pipeline facility, it's important to know that they don't need to build a new pipeline for Phase 2. The pipeline that's been built, the Gateway project already has the capacity of about 5 Bcf a day. So they can add another LNG facility or another -- sorry, another phase to that without having to do anything but add compression. So even though they haven't announced that their Phase 2 has gone positive FID, which is final investment decision, the work has already started. So that's very positive. We expect that we hear a positive final investment decision on that project this year. That's what the indication has been as we head into the back half of the year here. And then we also -- the Ksi Lisims project is another project that is expected to go positive final investment decision, and that's another 2 Bcf a day. And you'll see in my newsletter -- or sorry, my e-mail, the projects that are now being talked about would take Canada to over 7 Bcf a day of exports in LNG by the end of the decade. 7 Bcf a day, again, keep coming back to that same number of 19 Bcf a day is a tremendous amount, high -- incredible high percentage of our total production. So as you add more and more demand, you're going to need that supply. And it's not that we don't have the gas in the ground, the question is at what price do we bring the gas out of the ground. And so our view is that it's setting up quite positively for natural gas in the next few years as all these major projects come on in addition to the data center demand that's going to be coming on during that same time frame. So I hope that's a good update on that. Another question we had is when -- what percentage of U.S. LNG exports is relative to their production? The U.S. LNG growth is really one of the greatest industrial stories of our time. I mean in 2016, the United States exported 0 LNG. Today, they're the world's largest LNG exporter. So it's been an incredible growth. And that number is around -- they've been as high as 20 Bcf a day. They've got some maintenance projects going on right now. And I think Freeport has had some operational issues. I think they're around today about 18 Bcf a day of exports. And then as I mentioned before, they're about 107 Bcf a day of production. Now keep in mind, though, not only do they have the LNG exports, which is in that 18 to 20 Bcf a day, and that number is going to over 35 Bcf a day. So almost double in the next 5 years. So by the time we exit into 2030, we're talking about that LNG being over 35 Bcf a day. In addition, they export about 6 to 8 Bcf a day to Mexico every day by pipeline, which is about the same number that they bring in from Canada. So in Canada, at times, half of our production goes to the U.S. by pipeline. And we've -- so it's an incredible amount of investment that's gone into that Gulf area, which is where the exports come out of. The big advantage for Western Canada is that our shipping time to Asia, and Asia is the biggest importer of LNG in the world, and that includes Japan and China and Taiwan and South Korea. We're about a 10-day shipping as opposed to 24 days out of the Gulf. So Canada has got a real advantage for sending gas off the West Coast, so much so that even Mexico, which is an importer of natural gas, is building LNG facilities to take advantage of that same shipping advantage or timing being off the West Coast. So it's an exciting area. It's been incredible growth, one of the biggest growth areas from an industrial standpoint in any industry in North America, and it's not slowing down. I mean it is picking up speed. And you can see right now, there's no reason why that's going to slow down given the shortage of LNG and the high prices elsewhere in the world. We've talked about the North American prices. Today, AECO is like $1.60 roughly. I'd say the NYMEX, which is the U.S. natural gas price, is a little under $3 in Asia and in Europe, over $20 an Mcf for the exact same molecules. So that arbitrage, the only way that arbitrage gets closed is by more LNG facilities being built in North America to export gas. So again, we think that's a positive because we believe that what will happen is that the international prices will come down to a more sustainable level for them, which is good because you don't want them to go into alternatives. We want them to continue to use a clean source natural gas, especially in the Asian communities where if they're going to go to coal, the carbon emissions are substantially 30% higher. And if that price comes down, so it makes their economies go around better. It also, at the same time, it should be pulling up our pricing. And therefore, there's -- the arbitrage price, you see difference usually between $6 and $8 is kind of the expected price of what it costs for liquefaction and transportation. We did have a question about carbon tax. Maybe I'll pass that over to Terry.
Terry McNeill
executiveSure. The question was the impact of carbon tax on Pine Cliff going forward. And the short answer is we don't expect any impact on carbon taxes. We are classified as a small emitter. And under the current regulations, we are not subject to carbon tax going forward. So as long as the Feds don't reinstate federal fuel tax, we -- at that time, we potentially would be impacted, but that's not anticipated at this point in time. So going forward, we've made no allowances for carbon tax as we are not taxable under that program right now.
Philip Hodge
executiveThanks, Terry, and thank you to everybody for all the great questions. We really appreciate that. It makes the webcast a lot more interesting for us and hopefully also for you as opposed to just reading our press release. You know you can reach us at any time. So if there's any further questions that you want answered, you want to talk to any one of us, just reach out. We're happy to chat with you. We continue to believe that we've positioned ourselves well going into this winter and into '27. We're looking forward to drilling another Glauc well. And so until next quarter, thank you very much. Thanks for those of you that are shareholders. Thank you very much for your support. We very much appreciate it. Have a good day.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.