Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 24, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Health Care Life Sciences Tools and Services conference_presentation 46 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#1

Okay. Great. Thank you for joining us. Excited to have Thierry Bernard, the CEO of QIAGEN with us for the next session here at the Citi conference. I'm Patrick Donnelly, the tools and diagnostics analyst here at Citi. And Thierry, maybe I'll turn it over to you quickly just for a few minute intro, and then we'll dive into questions. If anyone has specific questions, I think there's an area on the screen to ask or feel free to e-mail me and I'll make sure to ask. But Thierry, maybe I'll turn it over to you for a quick intro.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#2

Okay. Thanks, Patrick, and very pleased to be with you guys. Good afternoon, good morning, depending on where you are in the world, but potentially good evening for some of you here in Asia as well. So in a few words, if you remember, when I was asked to take over at the end of 2019, we came to you to -- with some commitments of increased transparency and focusing on executing quarter after quarter. I think in very short introduction, I would say that 2020 is proving that we have delivered on that. We are now with 5 quarters of execution of our target, sometimes beating those targets, both on the top line and on an EPS also perspective. We also took the commitment to increase our transparency and the simplicity of the way we report our performance. And I think you have seen that in the new way of presenting our results and numbers, it, I think, allows you to better trace our performance. The good thing also, especially in the second half of 2020 is to see that not only do we continue to be very relevant as a company in the fight against COVID-19, but we are not dependent on those COVID tailwinds because we see also the non-COVID business of QIAGEN recovering pretty well. And we continue to closely follow, obviously, the evolution of the market. We speak on a daily basis with our customers, with analysts to see how this pandemic is going to evolve. But basically, you know that we built our guidance for 2021 with basically the assumption that we will still have a strong demand for COVID-related products, especially in H1, and that at the same time, the non-COVID product, both in H1 and H2 will continue to recover. This being said, after beating our objectives for 2020, we reaffirm our guidance for '21, and we already obviously managed QIAGEN with a post pandemic vision, i.e., we are carefully, obviously pushing what we call our 5 pillars of growth. This is where we want to invest, while at the same time, making sure that we are not loading our company with fixed cost that could be detrimental, obviously, once the pandemic subside. Really, in a nutshell.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#3

Great. Yes, it's a helpful intro. And maybe we'll start kind of on recent trends, and then we'll certainly get into some of the longer-term targets you guys laid out in December. But maybe just 4Q, COVID accelerated sequentially nicely. I think 3Q, there were some questions as to the manual versus automated sample prep, which we'll get into. But COVID accelerated nicely. The base business, it was roughly flat, kind of taking out those COVID tales. Could you maybe just talk through, I guess, how things trended throughout the quarter. And again, to your point, you reiterated '21, how you felt kind of exiting the quarter in terms of trends, both on COVID and then non-COVID as well?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#4

So yes, you're perfectly right, Patrick, the first thing that I would like to insist on is that starting with non-COVID because let's not forget that non-COVID is the base of QIAGEN. I'm very happy to see that, as you said, Q4 was sequentially better than Q2 and Q3. And we said that at the end of Q2 already, when we said we see some normal QIAGEN growth drivers such as QuantiFERON, for example, such as UNGS, universal chemistry, especially in oncology, coming back. Let's take QuantiFERON. You remember in Q2 of 2020, we said QuantiFERON is impacted by COVID because of 3 things mainly: reallocation of testing and resources in many labs; second, two key drivers of QuantiFERON disappeared with COVID immigration testing and what we call community testing, such as university testing, school testing. But at the same time, end of Q2, we said we are strongly negative, close to minus 50% in Q2, but we see an acceleration. Q3 confirmed that acceleration. We went to minus 20%, a bit more than that growth rate for QuantiFERON. And then we said Q4 will show still a recovery. We will still finish 2020 negative for QuantiFERON, that you will see again an improvement in Q4. And this is what we did. In Q4, we were just slightly negative for QuantiFERON. We were even positive in some geographies, especially in North America, which is a very strong signal for us. And which is also pushing us to say, yes we will recover the QuantiFERON 2019 revenues by 2021. So let's see that we lost a year basically, but we are back on track. The UNGS business, mainly dedicated to oncology suffered as well from some tailwind, but we see it also recovering. I think that we are probably now back at -- in number of tests, a 70% to 80% in oncology, pre-COVID testing volume. This is why I strongly believe that, for example, universal chemistry for NGS should be growing at double-digit in 2021. If you look at the COVID now, so you know that we have different components of offer. We have the sample prep, we have the PCR test, and now we have new offers coming in, obviously. On the sample prep, there is something that potentially because of us, wrong communication, I don't know, but the market had basically a bad idea, I think, in the Q2 and Q3. Sample tech dedicated to COVID is only a very small part of our sample tech business. It's probably in a normal time, 20% to 25% of our total portfolio, which is RNA based, the rest, which is DNA based, which is extremely relevant, not only in infectious diseases but also in oncology is also recovering in the second half of the year. But what is interesting is that sample tech again, was proportionally sequentially better in Q4 than in Q3 and Q2 because we have launched a new product dedicated to COVID, what we call the QIAprep&amp, which is helping us coping with the needs in automation. And at the same time, as I said, the non-COVID part of the sample tech is accelerating as well. And on the PCR side, especially with NeuMoDx and QIAstat, as you have seen, we have confirmed a very strong Q2 and Q3, and we have placed a significant number of instrument, which gives us also a very good solid base for '21 growth of consumable, obviously.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#5

Yes. That's helpful. And then maybe just kind of coming through the COVID piece, and we'll certainly spend a lot of time on non-COVID because I don't think that's the more important part. But I guess with COVID, you guys have talked about $800 million of COVID product sales in '21. Can you just talk through, I guess, the split or how you're feeling about kind of sample technologies, PCR and then the OEM kind of those 3 buckets. And then from there, maybe we can get into some of the upside drivers like the antigen test in the area?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#6

Yes. Well, you have seen that in the publication of our results and the new transparency we give you to better again, assess the performance. The way we see it, and we disclosed that on December 8. If you look at 2021, sample technology, we expect it to be overall around basically $750 million and this takes into account in our mind, a decline of roughly $60 million of manual workflow for COVID, exactly what we have said in 2020. Again, we do compensate that decline in COVID manual workflow with new solution in our for automation solution, QIAsymphony, QIAcube or EZ1 and also that new product QIAprep&amp. Then you see, obviously, a strong push on our PCR assays and PCR solution. We have disclosed that we expect QIAstat to go to around $120 million sales in 2021, NeuMoDx to go to around $140 million next year. Obviously, this will be favored accelerated by COVID. But again, none of those 2 solutions are strictly COVID dependent. When the pandemic subsides, we have menu to offer on those 2 platforms. And then we disclosed also to you that 2 non-COVID of our 5 pillars the QIAcuity, our digital PCR and QuantiFERON, we gave you also very precise number. As I said before, QuantiFERON, we expect it to go back to the 2019 level at roughly $230 million. This is a very solid, more than double-digit -- double-digit growth, obviously. And we told you also that a solution, which is absolutely not driven by COVID, even if we have some COVID application for it, the digital PCR should go from roughly a bit more than $10 million end of 2020 to $45 million in 2021. So it gives you a pretty good image here of what we expect as growth drivers for next year.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#7

Yes, that's helpful. And then I guess on the COVID side, can you talk through kind of U.S. versus OUS? Are you seeing manual sample prep pick up a little bit in less developed nations? I know that was a potential as we go into '21.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#8

That's a good question, Patrick. And I think that the way you should see it is that in developed country, at this level of the pandemic as of today, the majority of testing is done in automated solution, QIAGEN or competition. And again, for QIAGEN, that means what we can provide on QIAsymphony, QIAcuity, EZ1 and our prep&amp solution, which is really ramping up very fast. You are right. In emerging countries, there is still demand for manual workflow. Where we are selective here is that QIAGEN, as you know, is not a price company. We sell quality products. So we select those geographies for manual workflow where we can sell the full value of our RNA manual offer. So we are selective here.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#9

Okay. That's great. And then just on the antigen test, can you just talk through, I guess, your guys' offering us, you have the partnership with Ellume, maybe what the upside potential is, how we should be thinking about the regulatory bodies, upside scenarios? I think it's a big variable people maybe don't fully understand. So it would be great to hear on that.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#10

Sure. Sure. So the first message for me here, Patrick, is that, first of all, that antigen development with Ellume is really in the right focus strategy that we hammer and hammer for the last now 12 months. We didn't develop an antigen project for -- product for COVID because we believe, okay, there is an opportunity. We had an established product and development with Ellume for latent TB that we introduced in our New York Investment Day, 2 years ago. We took advantage of that technology being able to pivot to other applications to say because of COVID, our offer with Ellume, what we call the QIAreach is very well adapted, and we quickly developed with Ellume that antigen solution and an antibody. I remind you that our solution with QIAreach is the only in the market which will enable you to run on the same reader, an antibody test or an antigen test. What happened with our antigen is that we started with good reception on the U.S. market because that was our focus from a pricing standpoint, we decided to focus on the U.S. market because this is where we were capturing the most value for our solution, but we started to notice end of December a higher rate than expected of false positive. Our customers told us we are used to that. It's worth continuing and we said, no, we cannot take that risk. We are going basically to withdraw temporarily, the product, fix the issue, go to the FDA, withdraw our submission, and we'll come back to the FDA. We have found the issue, we are fixing it, and we are ready now in the coming weeks, probably at the latest early match to resubmit to the FDA clearly. So we will be back. I insist on 2 things. First of all, the problem that we experienced on the antigen product doesn't impact our antibody and doesn't impact the Reader, except either. It's just the antigen. There will be demand for antigen product during the first part of the year, but also even after when the pandemic will be receding. Obviously, it will be a lower demand. So having this product in our portfolio will be still useful. We do not expect any revenues in our guidance of 45% for Q1, we didn't factor any antigen revenue. We expect to be back with some revenues for antigen starting Q2 and for the rest of the year.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#11

Okay. Perfect. So then I guess, maybe we'll shift over to the base business a little bit here. Maybe start on QIAcuity, a lot of exciting things happening, 200 orders in 2020, can you just talk about the initial reception and then again, I expect it for '21 as we go through where do you see the big interest here?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#12

So indeed, QIAcuity is one of our major satisfaction for 2020 for 2 reasons. One, we launched it in the context that was not easy to launch a new solution that had nothing to do with COVID at the beginning. And we had the objective in 4 months of launch of having 200 purchase orders. And we hit that. We hit in 4 months, those 200 POs, of which 75% have been installed before the end of 2020 and it continues. The second topic of satisfaction is that we were agile enough to understand that there was a growing need in COVID this time, involving digital PCR, it's wastewater of testing. One of our competitor recently said that it's potentially a market of around $200 million in the world, and we quickly developed a solution that we are launching as we speak. As a result, we believe because we are so differentiated from the main competitor on the market at the moment. And I remind you those 3 key differentiation. First of all, we don't launch -- we do not launch only 1 system. We do launch 3 systems at the same time. One plate, four plate, 10 plates. Second differentiation: We are the only solution fully integrated sampling result out. For competition, you need to piecemeal different components, much more complicated. Third, basically, we are much faster in processing our time to result. And so we are extremely confident. It's a life science play at the moment, so we have already in our portfolio, thousands of applications in oncology, Academia, as I just said now wastewater as well. And then we said we believe that we can hit $45 million in 2021 with that product? We believe that we can hit 600 placements of instrument. And obviously, we try everything to beat that expectation.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#13

Yes, Thierry. And then the longer term, you guys have talked also about bringing it into the clinical setting. I think by 2023 or so, maybe just talk through that strategy, is it kind of replacing qPCR that's being used for molecular testing. What's kind of the strategy? And then, I guess, what can we look out for over the next few years as you progress towards that?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#14

So your perfectly right, Patrick. I mean, you can see our expenses and OpEx progression for 2021 that we already take advantage of those good results to invest in bringing this QIAcuity digital PCR solution from life science to regulatory approval and make it fully fledged diagnostic instruments. For this, you need to have 2 major evolution and major expenses. One is basically software adjustment and second is starting clinical trials to bring it obviously to the FDA and to the European authorities, and obviously, Chinese authorities later and so on. We believe it's going to take 2 years. And we start to invest this year, to be on the market by 2022. We have decided strategically again that notion of focus that we will dedicate this clinical digital PCR, first and foremost, to oncology, and also to companion diagnostics. Now to the question of, is this cannibalizing qPCR? I don't really think so. There will be some small overlaps, but it's not major. I always give the same example, Patrick, some years ago, many people were thinking that molecular biology would kill culture, it never happened. Closer to us, some people were saying, NGS would kill PCR, it doesn't happen. Those are complementary technology depending on what do you want to address from a patient's standpoint? Are you basically -- what are you looking at more mutations just in oncology, for example. So it's much more complementary technology. And its effect complements what we do on qPCR and is the right time to say -- the right thing to do, especially from a companion diagnostic standpoint because in 2022 and '23, we will be able to offer to pharma company portfolios of companion diagnostic in PCR, where we are still leader. Companion diagnostic in NGS, where we are starting to penetrate the market with our first NGS-based companion diagnostics launched last year and also digital PCR solution. So it's quite of a unique position.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#15

Absolutely. And maybe just bounce around the portfolio a little bit. QIAstat-Dx obviously had a big 2020 in terms of COVID kind of accelerating the adoption. Can you just talk about where we are in the capacity expansion, you guys are undertaking, both on the instrument and cartridge side. I guess where we are in terms of bringing more capacity online and where we stand versus a year ago. I mean, you guys have obviously expanded it quite significantly.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#16

So you know that QIAGEN high indeed, a significant level of CapEx in 2020 and that we are going to have also a healthy level of CapEx in '21. Those are the right investments. We are investing in ramping up capacity, not only for QIAstat, but also for QIAstat. And for QIAstat, it has meant, first of all, doubling the capacity in our 2 sites Barcelona and Düsseldorf in 2020. And the objective in April of this year to double again this output capacity. And I'm talking here on the consumable. The way you should see it, Patrick for the coming months very clearly. We have no issue with instrument supply, no issue with instrument supply. On the consumables, we will be systematically below market demand during the duration of the pandemic, which translates into everything we manufacture and put out of our 2 factories is sold basically. And that will be like this during the duration of the pandemic. Once the pandemic subsides, you have 3 interesting development for QIAGEN. First of all, let's not forget that we are talking about a syndromic panel. And even if you have much lower rates of COVID-19, let's say, by Q4 of this year, you will be in the winter season. I am very much convinced that anybody going to a hospital next winter with a cough or fever will be not only tested for flu, but also for COVID-19. We will have the solution. Second, QIAstat was acquired way before COVID and was in our business model way beyond as well. So QIAstat is a menu play. And we will bring in 2021 the GI panel for the U.S. and the meningitis panel in Europe. And every year, in '22 and '23, we need to continue to bring 1 or 2 new panels per year, okay? In '22, you will have the pneumonia and the direct identification of positive blood culture. So again, of course, at the moment there will be a roll out of the consumption on purely COVID needs, but then it will be lifted by the non-COVID menu, but the execution challenge is that, indeed, every year, we need to launch those 2 panels. But we have proven in the past that we are able to launch panels every year. Third, good evolution. In fact, in 2022, '22 will see the launch of a higher throughput QIAstat where, at the moment, you have basically 1 cartridge per unit. You will have a higher throughput system that will allow us to address higher hospitals. So that's the story that allows us to be optimistic for a system which is well differentiated, which is playing on the big market. It's at least a $1.3 billion market, and this market is still growing at a double digit growth rate.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#17

Yes. Thierry, you hit on a few things I want to dive into a little more. I guess, maybe to start, you kind of talked about the post-COVID world with STAT-Dx. How strategic have you guys been in terms of placing these instruments with people -- with accounts that will keep using it, right, and kind of see the menu coming and want to be involved in that versus just getting them out there for use today?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#18

So being under market demand, Patrick is very frustrating, but gives you one key advantage. You can select, okay? And so the guidelines to our salespeople is, first of all, reward the customers that have been loyal to QIAGEN from the start. Make sure that we satisfy the installed base before taking a new customers that would be more opportunistic. Second, anytime we start the discussion with the customer, engage them already beyond COVID on the other part of the menu, GI in Europe, do you know that meningitis is coming, what are you doing on meningitis at the moment? What kind of technology are you using? What is your volume starting the -- and second give priority to customers that are ready to engage in a pre-annual contract 2, 3 or even more years. That's the strategy that we are implementing for QIAstat, but also by the way for NeuMoDx as well.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#19

Yes. And then I guess on the menu expansion side, you touched on it a little bit. I think you're talking about having 80% of syndromic testing in the U.S. and Europe by the end of '21. I guess, how much visibility do you have in terms of all the necessary approvals and the regulatory bodies there? And what's the confidence level if we get to kind of critical mass on the menu within the next year or so?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#20

Well, obviously, as we said, Patrick, it's a menu play, but let's not forget something pre-COVID, QIAGEN was placing an average of 300 QIAstat per quarter, which was pre-COVID already quite comparable to what BioFire was able to place per quarter, but BioFire with a much larger menu that proves you basically the interest on the system. Now as I said before, clearly, we need to execute on our plan. 1 to 2 panels per year from now to the coming at least foreseeable future. We have already had panels approved to the FDA or CE mark or to other regulatory authorities. So we are investing in those clinical trials. It's clear that at the moment, there are tensions on clinical trials, Patrick, because of the pandemic, so finding the patients, finding the samples. But at the moment, we are still on track, and we confirm that our objective is to get GI in the U.S. with the FDA in Q3 and to have meningitis also in Europe for the second half of the year. And so I see nothing at the moment contradicting those objectives. Pneumonia is already under development. BCID, the positive identification -- the direct identification of positive blood culture is also in the pipeline. So it's still, then after executing on the normal R&D development of your product, going to clinical trials and going to approval as well.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#21

Sure. And you guys have talked a little bit about kind of a higher throughput instrument. Can you just talk through the timing there? And then also the fit in the market. I mean, is this going to be complementary to the current offering? Is it going to be a replacement? Maybe just talk through the strategy?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#22

So yes, we expect that higher throughput to come in 2022. At the moment, we are, let's say, mainly targeting with the current offer hospitals that are up to 200 beds that will allow us one, to capture higher segment and it would be a good segue between that segment of the new QIAstat and the lowest segment of the NeuMoDx. So it's very complementary to NeuMoDx segment and volume-wise. And second, it will also enable current customers to probably also accelerate their throughput. So it's much more a market expansion than the pure cannibalization. There will be some overlap, but what is important is the consumables. If they go to a higher throughput, that means that they have higher needs in consumables, and this is consumables that are bringing the margin on that solution, obviously.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#23

Yes. And that's probably a good time to switch over to NeuMoDx, as you mentioned, it kind of -- will be a little closer even when this comes out. I guess, similar to the stat question, menu expansion is obviously important, but maybe just on the capacity side, where are we in terms of the expansions? What are the expectations as we go through this year?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#24

So as a reminder, we finalized the acquisition of NeuMoDx during the summer of 2020, which means that from a purely acceleration of manufacturing output, it was difficult to do anything really before summer of last year. We have invested more CapEx, more OpEx, more resources. Our objective is to increase in 2021 and -- on both sides, both on the instrument manufacturing and on the consumable as well, and we are perfectly on track to do that. And the second objective, as you said, and it's already in our R&D expenses for 2021 is to make sure that we have already a solid menu in Europe. I remind you more than 13 assays. I'm not talking COVID, 13 assays registered in Europe. We need to bring them to the U.S., and this is why we see our R&D expenses, the clinical trials to make sure that we bring those products in '21, '22, '23. Bringing the full venue of NeuMoDx to the U.S. will take at least 2 years. But Patrick, let's not forget that NeuMoDx is the only system on the market allowing a customer to run at the same time in a complete random way laboratory developed test and regulated test. And as you are well aware, laboratory developed test what we call LDT is still a significant portion of the testing in the U.S. So we see currently in the U.S., already customers, not only using the COVID, but also the LDT. So this doesn't mean that -- that means that it's not because there will be at a point a lower level of COVID demand that certainly NeuMoDx in the U.S. in the immediate future will not be able to run anything. We already have LDT demands for NeuMoDx. And that's good added value.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#25

Yes. I guess on that point, I guess, what are you seeing in terms of the core assay demand versus COVID? Has that shifted at all in recent quarters? And again, obviously, COVID seems like the overwhelming demand, but curious how you kind of think about that playing out as we go forward here?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#26

So first of all, and this is another proof of QIAGEN agility. Inside the COVID itself, there is some evolution of demand. As you have understood, Patrick, we don't have 1 solution for COVID on NeuMoDx. We have a 3 solutions. One is monoplex COVID, second is 4-Plex, Flu A&B, RSV and COVID. So 4 parameters in one test COVID. Third, 3 is monoplex on saliva, and you are well aware but because of the willingness to test in schools, in universities, the saliva sample is going to be obviously, expected on the market. Then when you look in Europe, where we are with COVID, but also with other assays, we see many labs starting to increase their demand around, for example, the blood-borne viruses. I mean, HIV, HPV, HCV, for example. We have interesting start of our HPV test in Europe. And in the U.S., as I told you, it's very interesting that to see that as we speak, not only we have the COVID but also the LDTs.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#27

Yes. Makes sense. And then I guess, on the diagnostic side, people are always very interested in the kind of magical pull-through number, I guess, where do you kind of foresee that going as we kind of go through COVID again, obviously, now -- right now, it's elevated. But what do you kind of bake into some of the longer-term expectations for NeuMoDx, specifically in terms of what the pull-through is going to look like on that as the menu gets towards critical?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#28

Well, this is not -- I mean, you will recognize that we have given. And I think we are quite unique, especially in 2020, a significant number of -- numbers to help you modeling, obviously, on QIAGEN. This is not a number we give because we are really at the ramp-up of NeuMoDx so it's very hard to say what should be the -- basically expected consumption when you are in the routine, especially with the disruption of COVID. So I would not hesitate to give you a number like this, probably around the early 2022. At this moment, it's a bit early to say that. What is important is that we have the menu in Europe, and we have the LDT capabilities, not only in Europe but also in the U.S. This is the way I see it.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#29

No, that's definitely fair. And I guess maybe bouncing over to QuantiFERON to your point earlier, we did see a pretty nice recovery in 4Q. Maybe just talk how that business trended throughout the quarter into '21? And then any market dynamics that are going to drive the recovery here that we should be keeping an eye on or that you guys are looking at?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#30

So first of all, Patrick, thanks for the question on QuantiFERON. We have already slightly described it. Nice acceleration end of Q2, Q3, Q1. We finished the year '20 negative. But basically, with a very, very good recovery in Q4 that we see confirm in the first days of Q1 of 2021. I'm very pleased also to see that on the U.S. market, which is, as you know, our major revenue for QuantiFERON, we were positive in Q4. The second subject of satisfaction is that the partnership with DiaSorin, both in Europe and in the U.S. is really, really paying off. We are able to convert not only existing QuantiFERON customer that were on the manual workflow, but also competitive accounts. And we always convert them at a premium, okay? Third, you know that we have interesting also launches this year for QuantiFERON. The first one as we disclosed in New York 2 years ago, we have our solution for low resources country, high burden countries for TB is the solution developed with Ellume, we call the QIAreach. We have it ready. We are just so overwhelmed by different launch that by so far, we are probably waiting for the second quarter to the second half of the year to launch it fully. At the same time, we will launch in the summer, the Lyme development. You are aware that Lyme is an untapped diagnostic need in partnership this time with DiaSorin, and this launch will be in Europe. So when I accumulate those new launches, for which I do not expect a meaningful revenue in 2021. But it's good to show that we are innovating and having products, plus the current trends for recovery. The wealthy partnership and healthy partnership with DiaSorin, we confirm that we should be back at the level of 2019, which is basically achieving roughly $230 million again. And beyond that, I see no reason not to have a low double-digit growth for QuantiFERON in the framework of probably between $12 to $14, to 13% CAGR. For the franchise of close to $250 million, it's not bad.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#31

Yes. I guess to your point there, getting back to 2019 levels this year, I guess, in terms of the expectations, to your point, you're not layering in some of the new product launches, which are going to come later in the year. But how much conservatism did you guys bake in, just given the uncertainty that we've seen certainly coming out of the pandemic? And I guess what went into kind of building out that expectation for this year? Just trying to figure out if there are upside levers here.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#32

Well, I mean, I don't think that there is not -- there is absolutely no -- it's absolutely not conservative because if you do the calculation between 2020 to 2021, the percentage is quite significant, okay? No, we have based our numbers on discussion with our installed base, pipeline of conversion with DiaSorin Hamilton and Tecan. The fact that we believe that, especially in the second half of the year, if we have been already able to accelerate on QuantiFERON during the pandemic, we should see another acceleration post pandemic if that post pandemic happens in the second half of the year. And because we have such also deployed field team that we are ready to leverage any acceleration as they come. You see. So those are the drivers behind our numbers for 2021.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#33

Okay. And then maybe just on the sample prep side. You guys have obviously talked about the decline this year from the manual side. And then from this new base, low to mid single-digit growth on the go forward, maybe just talk through, I guess, the confidence level there. I think a lot of investors believe there's a lot of COVID in this base number that you're then going to grow off of. So maybe just talk through that, the moving pieces at a conference level again and growth off of the number from this year forward?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#34

So this sample tech numbers, we put it, if you remember, at around $750 million for sample tech for next year. It's obviously basically driven by the belief that there will still be a significant demand in H1 for RNA testing, which is COVID-based testing, that this believe factors the decline of RNA manual workflow and the improvement of automated workflow. It also factors the ramp-up of our QIAprep&amp solution, and it includes as well the ramp-up, not only in H1, but even more in H2 of our non-COVID solution for sample tech, which are DNA based mainly. And this is confirmed that by what we have seen, first of all, in Q4 and what we see also in the first as of '21. So the way you should see it beyond the pandemic is that, first of all, the COVID related will come back -- the RNA basically based sample tech will come back to its normal level, pre-COVID. And there, there will be no question between automation and manual because it's such a gold standard. You see the -- what we call the so-called famous spin columns of QIAGEN is such a gold standard in labs that when we go to a normal demand, it's not going to be a competition between manual and that. So that volume will stay. Absolutely, especially in research, Academia and so on. And the rest of the business will be essentially DNA, where we have proven to be very performing pre-COVID. The interesting thing is that even our latest innovation that we have launched for COVID, which is the QIAprep&amp is not COVID dependent. This solution, next winter, we'll be able to do both, for example, COVID and flu. If tomorrow or for '22, you will have -- you will want to have it only for flu, be my guest, it will be available only for flu. So you have other applications on which we are already working.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#35

That's a good way to frame it. Maybe last one, I know we're almost out of time. Obviously, there've been some headlines about you guys being acquired, merging, whatever it might be. Can you maybe just high level give us kind of a sense of where -- how you guys approach all that? And then at the same time, your leverage ratio is quite low. Should we think about you as an acquirer or again, put more of a target?

Thierry Bernard

executive
#36

Well, that's a good question. The first thing I would like to insist on, Patrick, is that you remember that we said, first, that our main strategy is around the 5 pillars of growth. We prove it with number. It's 60% of our R&D effort in 2021. It's an increase that done by 100% compared to 2019. And we believe that organically, we have a lot to choose and never forget my commitment or launch commitment, [indiscernible] commitment to the market at the end of '19, execution, execution, execution, first. Second, we believe that the market at the moment is slightly over evaluated, at least for some diagnostic company. So I'm not sure that it's the right time to be obsessed by that, okay? But there will be a time. QIAGEN is a publically listed company. QIAGEN is a dealmaking company, and we are obviously extremely interesting in bolt-on acquisition, but with one condition, Patrick. And this is also a change compared to the past. I don't want to go that wide. I want to go deep. So bolt-on acquisition only if it strengthens the 5 pillars of growth or second filter, it has a value for the rest of the core business, oncology, but not to basically do an acquisition for the sake of looking for some growth, for example, it has to reinforce the 5 pillars of growth. Another way as well of looking of a capital deployment is that basically also thinking about increasing the return for our shareholders, and we are still very open, for example, to actions such as a share repurchase program, for example, this is something that we have done in the past. We are very ready to do it again. But this is how we should think about it.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#37

Yes. Okay. And I know we're out of time. There's a lot of ground to cover. I certainly appreciate, Thierry. It's a fascinating story and appreciate your time here today.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#38

Thanks for your time. Thank you.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#39

Take care.

Thierry Bernard

executive
#40

Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Qiagen N.V. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Qiagen N.V. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.