Real Matters Inc. (REAL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 7, 2020

Toronto Stock Exchange CA Real Estate Real Estate Management and Development shareholder_meeting 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Blaine Hobson

executive
#1

I've got to find my glasses or this is going to be a really bad event. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Real Matters Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. I'm Blaine Hobson, the Chair of the Board of Directors of Real Matters. I will act as Chair of this meeting. And this meeting is now called to order. I'd like to extend a warm welcome to our shareholders present with us this morning as well as those joining by webcast. Present with us today from the company's Board of Directors are Garry Foster, Lisa Melchior, Peter Vukanovich, and Jason Smith, who is also the company's Chief Executive Officer. And from the management team, we are joined by President and Chief Operating Officer, Brian Lang, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, William Herman. Also joining us today is Jay Greenspoon, General Counsel and Secretary for Real Matters. Jay will act as secretary of the meeting and Christopher de Lima and Rebecca Prentice, representatives of TSX Trust company, the company's registrar and transfer agent, will act as scrutineer. The agenda for this meeting can be found on the screen behind me, which is also visible to everybody on the webcast. After the formal portion of the meeting, Jason will update you on the company's progress, followed by a question-and-answer session. If you have questions or comments, we would ask you to hold them until the appropriate time in the meeting. With that, we can move forward with the official proceedings. I would first like to recognize that for convenience the movers and seconders for the motions presented by the company are employees of the company who are also shareholders. In terms of voting procedure, each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each common share held. Voting on the election of directors will take place by way of ballot. Other matters will be voted on by way of show of hands unless anyone expressly requests they be voted by way of ballot. The scrutineer will report to me on the shareholders present in person and the number of shares represented by proxy. At the meeting, we'll also compute the votes cast by ballot on any ballots conducted at this meeting. Prior to the commencement of this meeting, I received the preliminary scrutineer's report, and total represented at the meeting are 56,228,037 shares, which is 66.2% of the outstanding shares. The preliminary scrutineer's report on attendance at the meeting has been read. So I declare then that the requisite quorum of shareholders is present and that the meeting is properly constituted for the transaction of business. I direct that the scrutineers report on attendance be annexed to the minutes of this meeting. I respect -- with respect to the mailing of materials to shareholders, I have a statutory declaration attesting to the service of the notice of meeting, the accompanying management information circular and form of proxy. And I direct that this statutory declaration be annexed to the minutes of this meeting. The agenda for motions to be submitted to the shareholders at this meeting is contained in the notice of meeting that you received prior to this meeting. A notice calling this meeting, the accompanying management information circular and the form of proxy were mailed to all shareholders entitled to receive notice in accordance with applicable law. Additional copies of these materials are also available at this meeting and on the company's website. Accordingly, I will ask for a motion to dispense with the reading of the notice of meeting.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#2

I am a shareholder, and I move that the meeting dispense with the reading of the notice of the meeting.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#3

May I have a motion seconded, please?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#4

I'm a shareholder, and I second the motion.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#5

I put the motion to the meeting. All those in favor of the motion signify by raising your hands. [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#6

Contrary, if any? [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#7

I declare the motion to dispense with the reading of the notice carried. The next item of business concerns the audited consolidated financial statements of Real Matters for the financial year ended September 30, 2019. On behalf of the directors, I now place before the meeting the consolidated financial statements and report of the auditors thereon for the financial year ended September 30, 2019. We will now proceed with the election of directors. The Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the meeting at 7. I would now ask for the nomination of the persons named in the management information circular for election as directors for the coming year, each of whom has agreed to serve if elected. Unless authority to vote is withheld, the person named in the form of proxy accompanying the management information circular intends to vote for the election of each of the 7 nominees named in the management information circular. Please present a motion for this resolution.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#8

I'm a shareholder, and I nominate Gary Foster, Blaine Hobson, William Holland, Frank McMahon, Lisa Melchior, Jason Smith and Peter Vukanovich.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#9

In accordance with Real Matters bylaws, any shareholder wishing to nominate additional persons for election to the Board of Directors of this meeting was required to provide notice of such nomination in advance of the meeting. As no further nominations were presented to the company, I declare nominations closed. I would ask for a motion for the election of directors, please.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#10

I am a shareholder, and I move that the persons nominated for election as directors be elected as directors of the company until the next Annual General Meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected or appointed.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#11

May I have that resolution seconded, please?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#12

I am a shareholder, and I second the motion.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#13

I direct that we proceed to take the vote by ballot. Upon registration, the scrutineer identified those shareholders who are eligible to vote on this ballot and has distributed ballots as necessary. If you have previously submitted a proxy in favor of management, your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions you provided and you do not need to complete a ballot. If you have not received a ballot and believe you're entitled to one, please raise your hand and the scrutineer will provide you a ballot if appropriate. If everyone entitled to vote now has a ballot, please mark the ballot in accordance with the instruction therein and hand it to the scrutineer. [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#14

While the scrutineer tabulates the results of the vote I propose that we take a very short recess. Three, two -- this will just be a moment. And the winner is. So the scrutineer's report shows that each of the nominees set out in the management information circular has been duly elected as a director of Real Matters. On behalf of the company, I'd like to thank the directors for agreeing to stand for election and for their past efforts and contributions to Real Matters. We will now proceed with the appointment of the auditor. Deloitte has served as the auditors of Real Matters since 2012. The secretary has advised me that with respect to the appointment of the auditor, the total number of votes attached to shares represented by proxy and required to vote to withhold the vote against the appointment of Deloitte as auditors total less than 1% of all votes cast at this meeting. Accordingly, in order to expedite the voting list matter are proposed to conduct a vote on this matter by a show of hands unless a ballot is requested. I now request a motion on this resolution.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#15

I'm a shareholder, and I move that Deloitte be hereby appointed as auditors of the company until the next Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and that the directors of the company be authorized to fix the remuneration of the auditors.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#16

May I have a seconder on that resolution?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#17

I'm a shareholder, and I second the resolution.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#18

I now put the resolution to the meeting. All those in favor of the resolution, please signify by raising your hands. [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#19

Contrary, if any? [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#20

Motion is carried. I will proceed now to the final item of business of the meeting, which is to consider and if deemed appropriate, to pass with or without variation a resolution ratifying, confirming and approving the advance notice provision contained in the company's bylaws, No. 1-A, as amended. As discussed further on the management information circular, the Board of Directors amended the advance notice provision, to remove the maximum notice period and delete the requirement for the nominating shareholder to include certain information regarding the nominating shareholder in the nomination notice. The full text of the advanced notice provision is attached as appendix A to the management information circular. As disclosed in the company's press release dated January 24, 2020, the advance notice provision has been further amended to delete subsection 10.24(d)(viii). The Board believes that the amendments to the advance notice provision will ensure that all shareholders receive adequate notice of director nominees, including sufficient information with respect to all nominees to allow shareholders to register an informed vote. The secretary has advised me with respect to the resolution, ratifying the advance notice provision, the total number of votes attached to shares represented by proxy and required to be voted against the resolution, ratifying the advance notice provision total approximately 1% of all votes cast at this meeting. Accordingly, in order to expedite the voting on this matter, I propose to conduct a vote on this matter by a show of hands unless a ballot is requested. I now request a motion approving the resolution of form attached as Appendix B to the management information circular with the appropriate modification to such resolution to delete subsection 10.24(d)(viii).

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#21

I am a shareholder, and I move that the resolution in the form attached as Appendix B to the management Information circular, with the appropriate modification to such resolution to delete subsection 10.24(d)(viii) be and is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#22

Can I have a seconder, please?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#23

I'm a shareholder, and I second the resolution with the appropriate amendments.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#24

I now put the resolution with the appropriate amendments to the meeting. All those in favor of the resolution with the appropriate amendments, please signify by raising your hands. [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#25

Any opposed? [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#26

I declare the motion carried. That brings us to the end of the formal portion. If there's no further business to be brought before the meeting, I would ask for a motion to terminate the meeting.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#27

I move that this meeting be terminated.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#28

Can I have that seconded, please?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#29

I second the motion.

Blaine Hobson

executive
#30

All in favor, signify by raising your hands. [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#31

Any opposed? [Voting]

Blaine Hobson

executive
#32

I do declare that this meeting is now officially terminated. And I'll turn the floor over to Jason Smith. Thank you.

Jason Smith

executive
#33

Thank you for that exciting presentation, Blaine. Thank you, Blaine, and good morning, everyone. For those of you joining us via webcast, and as a reminder, the accompanying slide presentation for today's event can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website. As Blaine remarked earlier, joining us from our senior executive team today are: Bill Herman, Bill is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Brian Lang. Brian joined us in June, is President and Chief Operating Officer. His appointment to this newly created role represented the continuing development of Real Matters' leadership team and our evolution as a growth-oriented company. Brian is the former President of Mastercard Canada. His background in technology, serving the banking industry, made him an ideal fit for the role, and we are delighted to have him on board. Please note that my presentation may contain certain forward-looking statements about the company's business and the industry in which we operate as well as references to non-GAAP measures. Details regarding forward-looking information and non-GAAP measures are on the screen behind me and can also be found in our MD&A. Last year, I opened my remarks at the AGM by reiterating our commitment to shareholders, which centered around our focus on the long-term growth of our company and building a business that can weather peaks and valleys. Our strategy hasn't changed over the last year, and our financial performance in fiscal 2019 clearly demonstrated why it's so important that we stay the course and take a long-term view. Looking at our performance over the last 5 years, you can see that we have grown net revenue at a CAGR of 29%. During that time, we went from a single vertical focus on residential mortgage appraisals with less than 3% market share, servicing Tier 2 and Tier 3 lenders, to winning and launching the sixth largest U.S. banks by asset size in our U.S. Appraisal segment and growing our market share to 10.6%. We also entered the U.S. Title business in April 2016 through the linear acquisition and have grown that business from 0.2% market share to 1% share in a span of 3 years. We also increased adjusted EBITDA in our U.S. Title segment by more than 30% to $13.7 million in fiscal 2019. On a consolidated basis, we grew adjusted EBITDA by a CAGR of 54% from 2014 to 2019. And we did so while strengthening our balance sheet and buying back 5.4 million shares. At the end of fiscal 2019, we had cash of $71 million on the balance sheet, and that subsequently increased to $80.9 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Real Matters' financial position is stronger than ever. Our fiscal 2019 results demonstrated how our platform approach drives profitability on incremental volumes. On a consolidated basis, the business delivered $29 million in adjusted EBITDA, an increase of 400% from the $5.8 million we reported in fiscal 2018. While U.S. mortgage origination market transaction volume declined by an estimated 8% in fiscal 2019, we continued to gain market share, and we serviced record-high U.S. appraisal and U.S. Title transaction volumes, which drove a 15% increase in consolidated revenues, a 220 basis point expansion of net revenue margins and a fivefold increase in adjusted EBITDA. We made significant progress towards achieving our fiscal 2021 objectives, ending the year within our target ranges for consolidated adjusted EBITDA margins and U.S. title market share 2 years ahead of schedule. Our strong performance in fiscal 2019 keeps us on pace to achieve our fiscal 2021 targets. Taking a look at our U.S. Appraisal segment on Slide 8. We increased market share to 10.6% in fiscal 2019, up from 9% in fiscal 2018, and we posted market-adjusted growth of 17.2%. Over the course of the year, we expanded our existing client relationships by entering additional channels, like new construction and complex appraisals, and maintained our top performance ranking on client scorecards. We launched 7 new top 100 lenders, including the sixth Tier 1 lender, which means that we are now live with all 6 Tier 1 lenders. We believe we are the only provider delivering appraisals to all 6 Tier 1 lenders today. It's been a multiyear journey to get to this point, starting with the launch of our first Tier 1 lender in 2015. We've made great strides since then, successfully winning each Tier 1 lender and progressively growing share by leveraging our platform and partnering with our network of field professionals to outperform our competitors. As you know, the Tier 1 lenders represent a focal point of our long-term strategy, given their size and strength, and so this milestone is an important marker of how we are executing on our strategy. Today, Real Matters serves approximately 1 in 9 U.S. residential mortgage appraisals, and we believe we are the largest provider of residential mortgage appraisals in the U.S. In U.S. Title, we ended the year with a 1% share of the $10 billion U.S. title market, hitting the low end of our fiscal 2021 market share range. Our U.S. title segment also posted market-adjusted growth of 73% in fiscal 2019. Our strong financial performance in U.S. Title was the direct result of the integration work we did porting the business onto our platform in the prior year. We went live with 15 new lenders in the U.S. Title in fiscal 2019, including 6 top 100 lenders. Looking ahead, we continue to target additional top 100 lenders, including our existing Tier 1 appraisal clients. Our value proposition is resonating with lenders. The pace of refinance market activity in the latter half of fiscal 2019 and the continued strength we saw in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 has brought performance to the forefront of the conversation with lenders, and highlighted the need for them to add new lenders. We continue to drive these conversations with our existing appraisal clients and remain optimistic about our growth prospects in this segment. Fiscal 2019 was an excellent year for Real Matters. We did exactly what we set out to do: grow market share, improve net revenue margins and improve operating leverage. Looking ahead, we will maintain our focus on our core network management capabilities: to drive a competitive performance advantage, which we believe will allow us to achieve our market share objectives; and we will continue to be thoughtful about the company's use of capital as we invest for growth and create long-term value for our shareholders. As always, we are grateful for the trust of our customers, the loyalty, partnership and professionalism of our field professionals and the commitment and dedication of our employees. We're also very appreciative of the continued support and ownership of our shareholders. I'll now open the floor for questions. If you have a question, please raise your hand, so we can provide you with a microphone for the benefit of those joining us via webcast.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#34

Yes. I mean, I don't know that much about your business, but since you already have 10%, 12% of the appraisal market, doesn't it get harder growing from here?

Jason Smith

executive
#35

That's a great question. So when we look at our objectives that we set out in -- for 2021, it was to actually get to 15% to 20% of the market. We ended the year just over 10% at September 30. And we can do that with actually -- without adding any new clients. When we launch one of these customers, they start off with a very small part of their business. So maybe 1% in that first quarter. And then based on our performance, the next quarter, we'll get another market share award, the next quarter another market share award. So we get many years here of market share expansion. So we actually have a good line of sight to getting to that target range by 2021, just with the clients that we have. Now that wasn't meant to be a terminal value of where we think we can grow. We see market share expansion beyond that. And then we also have this other effect that in the last few quarters, the bigger regulated banks deposit-taking institutions, appear to be taking back share relative to the nonbanks. So that would actually be a further tailwind on the appraisal business. So we think we have lots of growth there yet to come. Great question.

Robert Young

analyst
#36

It looks like a strong U.S. mortgage market that we're in the middle of right now. You said that you're seeing some of the Tier 1 larger regulated banks taking share. Maybe if you could expand on that. Is there anything that you're seeing from your position that would give you confidence in near-term share growth with these large Tier 1 customers? Or is that a longer-term driver that you're talking about?

Jason Smith

executive
#37

Sure. Well, I think when I -- first of all, I think, be them Tier 2 or Tier 1, deposit-taking regulated institutions, I think that they're performing in a sort of a reasonably similar way. So I think they're both benefiting relative to the nonbanks that would just wholesale loans out to Fannie or Freddie. In terms of how we're performing with them, I think what's interesting is that we continue to rank at the top of their scorecards. So best operational performance is what drives that market share gain with them. And we haven't been capped by any one Tier 1 bank yet. And so we have, I think, north of 40% share now. We continue to drive share, not just in other channels, the main origination channel as well. And so I think we're on a mission to be the platform for the industry, and we're going to keep working away at it.

Robert Young

analyst
#38

And you said performance has become a bigger part of the conversation just recently. Are you talking about the ability for you to scale with the volume now, relative to other alternatives that the banks have? Or are you just talking about the share gains driven by the performance that you provide in the network of appraisers?

Jason Smith

executive
#39

Got it. So if we were to actually look at refi activity, be it either in our Appraisal segment or our Title segment. If we went back to this time last year, refinance volumes were actually at multi-decade lows. And so although we've doubled since then, it's off of a multi-decade low in terms of the refinance activity we'd be seeing here today. So most of the vendors in the space are staff models. So they're going to do the appraisal with staff appraisers or they're going to do the title with their own staff folks. And when you've had a doubling of volumes and the rest of the industry has been down at barebones levels this time last year, they struggle to scale. The banks themselves are struggling to scale. They're adding underwriters as fast as they can because of their capacity now. They can bring in folks from other parts of the bank. So they have a little bit more room. Our model is a network model. So our ability to drive is by building that capacity within the network. So it definitely favors us. But -- and then that drives to why our performance advantage can widen even further in a model like this. So I think if the banks are struggling with their staff-based vendors to perform, it's driving that discussion about why launching and adding an additional vendor is rising to the forefront.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#40

Thank you, Rob Young, from Canaccord, for your question. If you could please state your name and tell us if you're a shareholder before?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#41

My name is [ Abner Maziman ]. I'm a shareholder, and I have a question in 2 parts. The first part is, have you lost any client yet? And if you have, what were the reasons given? And if you haven't, which I think is more likely, unless I am proven wrong. Then the second question applies, in the old [ GIUC ], which may be much before your time...

Jason Smith

executive
#42

I remember it.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#43

Okay. They used to claim afterwards, the guy who bought them, claimed that companies that have an advantage always underprice what they're doing. And clients should be happy but not ecstatic. So when you are growing very fast, it's at least some probability you're underpricing what you're doing. So to a certain point comes a stage if either somebody buys you out and they jack up the price, lose 10% of the clients, but if they price 50% higher, it's a net gain. Or comes a stage in which you begin to harvest the market. You're well before that. So again, the first question is have you ever lost a client? And if you did, why? And if you haven't, at what point would you become so big you can start cheekily raising prices and start squeezing the clients because you are, in effect, the industry standard?

Jason Smith

executive
#44

I won't comment on that last part, as it's being webcast and recorded. But so we -- when we went public only a few years ago, it's a very sticky business. We had to go back and see any evidence of client loss. On the Appraisal side, we had lost 2 clients out of the hundreds that we service. And one was because they were bought, so not because of our performance. And the other one was because as we got into deployment with them, we found that they want to adversely select us, not for price interestingly enough, but for pushing values, trying to get the appraised value to what they need you to close the deal. And that's not the right client for us. So I cannot think of another at scale, a client, there is a very sticky business. When I drive to price, it's interesting. We're in a regulated market. So those dynamics that go around traditional software pricing be it enterprise or consumer are very difficult to play through out of this business. So appraisal fees tend to be set at the state or county level. They tend to be consistent across the vendors and across the banks. And if anything, the pricing in the industry has been going up. It hasn't been coming down. The same plays well on the title side, it's even more strict in terms of its regulation. And all the disclosures around who gets to -- who can share and what -- how pay what is a great moat around this business. It was one of the attributes that I loved about both appraisal and title, is they're not price-driven activities. So there is some latitude in driving price, and we would position ourselves to the higher end of that, not to the lower end of that. We've always focused on being the quality provider in the marketplace. So that would be on the client side. On the -- what we pay outside those, so driving to margin, that is a key attribute to what we do. So if we can take volume as we grow and put it in fewer and fewer appraisers in tighter areas, we often like to think about them as a FedEx truck driving around with only one package on the truck. As we load, that's how we get pricing power with our appraisers. So that's what's been driving the margin expansion in the business, and is actually a very important component of how we drive earnings. Thank you.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#45

I'm [ Alex Dezanine ] from Dallas, Texas. I'm a Shareholder. The first question I had was on the appraisal side of the business. It seems like you guys win or have such a higher standard of service due in part to technology. Are there any competitors, traditional or less direct guys like CoreLogic or Fidelity National that have features or tech that you admire?

Jason Smith

executive
#46

It's a great question. I don't think I've ever been asked that before. I would say with respect to what we're doing at appraisal management, I would say the answer is no. Most of the technology out there is really been built around workflow automation and appraisal management. So it's around -- we have staff appraisers or we have cheap appraisers and they make errors. So how are we going to efficiently manage our operational structures or our quality control structures? So many of the technologies are around optimizing the workflow at the back end of the bus. Our objectives and our technology are driving on network management at the front end of the bus. So how we engage the right appraiser to do the job right the first time. We don't want to correct the error. We don't want to have a workflow or a QC process that catches the error. We want to prevent it upfront. So the technology investment and the operational investments are actually directly opposed in terms of where we fund versus our competitors.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#47

And again, kind of on the appraisal side, it's -- I think you're more customer-focused than sort of focused on competition. But have you seen the competitive dynamics change at all over the past 18 months or 2 years with guys trying to get into the market that it looks like you guys are growing really well in?

Jason Smith

executive
#48

We always watch. But we have not seen the competitive landscape change. I think what's interesting about the U.S. mortgage market is the segmentation is really important. So I'm a big Crossing the Chasm fan, and there are thousands of banks in the U.S., but the top 100 banks do 80% to 90% of the volume. And those banks have fundamentally different needs, even within that 100 segmentation, top 6 takes very different than maybe federal credit union, that it makes it very difficult. They tend to be a national player. So the upstarts try to get in and start with a really small 3-branch community bank that's servicing features and functions and maybe a giveaway. And as you move up, the banks are focused on reliability, consistency and security, and they have to sign off on us as if they did the work. So they're actually a balance sheet strength, et cetera. So it's a really hard chasm to climb. We see lots of attempts. We had some folks -- we were fortunate to launch right after the mortgage crisis when so many of those lenders at the bottom end of that had to make a flip out and put a compliance later in. So there's maybe 3 of us at the time. I know 2 of them are gone -- or one of them -- I don't know what happened with the third one, but might be inside another organization somewhere. But I think what we did well was being very focused, disciplined on where we were going and where investments were. So we actually shed clients from the early days in order to focus on the features and functions in investments and service that we need to do in order to drive to get the volume. And even then we'll be knocking on a Tier 1 bank door and they'd be like that's cute when you guys are national and can handle an order anywhere, then come back and talk to us. And so if any win the regional banks, and as we started to get into the Tier 1s, then they tend to move as a segment and a cohort. So we're finding the title business is moving in a very similar fashion.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#49

And then lastly, my last question is, on a title business, your appraisal business to me, the value prop seems much more clearer and your advantage seems much more clearer today. And then 10 years out, what are the pain points you would really like to solve on the title business to grow your market share there?

Jason Smith

executive
#50

Great. So today, we're focused on centralized refi. And when I use that word centralized, it really is around how the volume is organized. So it's the bank requiring a vendor, connecting to their mainframe, and that's the same thing we do on the appraisal side. So it's operationally driven. You bring in the dynamic then of the consumer. What was the consumers' experience? So a consumer NPS rating would be important then on that dynamic. But it's a sort of similar quarterly progression where they're reviewing and scorecarding us versus their other vendors that drives the share gains. So that plays really well and lines up to our core appraisal execution. When we move then beyond refi, and this is all that's in our 2021 plan so far, stay tuned, we plan on going after the centralized, purchase-driven business from the same banks. So -- versus a decentralized sort of retail execution. So think about call center-driven purchase activity, prequalifying for a new purchase loan and being able to integrate within those systems. So where operational excellence is important, but where we're also integrating into the rest of the execution for the bank to drive a great customer experience. And we think that will bode well. The low-hanging fruit, of course, is the refi for us to drive that. Thank you.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#51

Any other questions? Okay.

Jason Smith

executive
#52

Great. Thank you all. That concludes our meeting, and thank you for joining us today, and enjoy the rest of a snowy day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Real Matters Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Real Matters Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.