Renasant Corporation (RNST) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 29, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood day, and welcome to Renasant Corporation's 2026 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] Also, please be aware that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Kelly Hutcheson, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Please go ahead.
Kelly Hutcheson
executiveGood morning, and thank you for joining us for Renasant Corporation's quarterly webcast and conference call. Participating in the call today are members of Renasant's executive management team. Before we begin, please note that many of our comments during this call will be forward-looking statements, which involve risk and uncertainty. There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the mix and cost of our funding sources, interest rate fluctuations, regulatory changes, portfolio performance and other factors discussed in our recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our recently filed earnings release, which has been posted to our corporate site, www.renasant.com at the Press Releases link under the News and Market Data tab. We undertake no obligation, and we specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time. In addition, some of the financial measures that we may discuss this morning are non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release. And now I will turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Kevin Chapman.
Kevin Chapman
executiveThank you, Kelly, and good morning. Our performance in the second quarter continued at the pace we set in the first quarter. Operating results across the company were strong as we continue to focus on organic growth as well as disruption in many of our markets. Adjusted earnings per share in the second quarter were $0.94, up 36% from a year ago. Adjusted return on average assets was 1.3% compared to 1.01% in the same period last year. Similarly, adjusted return on average tangible common equity was 16.25% versus 13.5% in the second quarter of 2025. The efficiency ratio also improved from 67.6% a year ago to 57.9% this quarter. By focusing on increasing core banking relationships and adding talent throughout the company, Renasant is in a great position to capitalize on growth opportunities throughout the back half of the year. I will now turn the call over to Jim to provide more details on our financial results.
James Mabry
executiveThank you, Kevin, and good morning. Looking at the balance sheet, loans were up $220.9 million on a linked quarter basis, or 4.7% annualized. Deposits were down $398.4 million from the first quarter, or 7.2% annualized, primarily due to seasonal outflows of public fund deposits. Reported net interest margin decreased 4 basis points to 3.83%, while adjusted margin remained flat at 3.61%. Our adjusted total cost of deposits increased by 2 basis points to 1.96%, while our adjusted loan yields decreased 1 basis point to 6.03%. From a capital standpoint, all regulatory capital ratios remain in excess of required minimums to be considered well capitalized. We recorded a credit loss provision on loans of $3.8 million, comprised of $1.2 million for funded loans and $2.6 million for unfunded commitments. Net charge-offs were $2.8 million and the ACL as a percentage of total loans declined 2 basis points quarter-over-quarter to 1.54%. Turning to the income statement. Our preprovision net revenue was $112.4 million. Net interest income was $227.7 million, a decrease of $0.8 million quarter-over-quarter. Noninterest income was $51.2 million in the second quarter, a linked quarter increase of $0.9 million. Noninterest expense was $161.5 million for the second quarter, a linked quarter increase of $6.2 million, mostly driven by deferred compensation accruals tied to market valuations, higher health insurance claims and annual merit increases. We look forward to the second half of 2026. I will now turn the call back over to Kevin.
Kevin Chapman
executiveThank you, Jim. We believe that Renasant is in a great position to continue to improve on its high levels of performance. We appreciate your interest in Renasant and look forward to discussing our results with you. I will now turn the call over to the operator for questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] And our first question here will come from Michael Rose with Raymond James.
Michael Rose
analystI wanted to start on loan growth. Obviously, really good production this quarter. Can you just talk about the expectations as we think about the back half of the year because it looks like if I either include or exclude Republic, you guys were a little short of my expectations and consensus. And just want to get a sense for production levels from here, scheduled payoffs and what you would expect out of Republic business as we move forward.
Kevin Chapman
executiveMichael, it's Kevin. So if you broke down several of the components of the growth, we were pleased with the uptick in production that we had in Q3. As you noted, that was offset by some headwinds in payoffs and still think payoffs are going to continue to be something we have to overcome. But as we look at our pipeline, as we look at our efforts, we look at our conversations with customers, production is ramping and it's ramping -- in fact if we look at our pipeline today, it's up about 6% to 10% from where it was at the beginning of Q2. So we're seeing where we've guided to that mid-single-digit growth number, we're seeing that fully in scope and fully in range as we get into Q3 and into the back half of the year.
Michael Rose
analystVery helpful, Kevin. And then maybe one for Jim on expenses. Expenses were maybe a little bit higher than I think what I was looking for, but any change to the trajectory that you guys had previously talked about? And maybe if you can just balance some of the investments that you guys are making in both people and technology along with other cost-saving opportunities that you guys may have.
James Mabry
executiveSure, Michael. So yes, we had a couple of onetime or nonrecurring items in the expense bucket. And when we look at our core expense run rate, we feel really good with where it is. And again, of course, we can't -- these are obviously the results are results, but the underlying trends in expenses, we feel is good. And I would say our outlook from here is that what we saw in Q1 in terms of expenses probably will moderate downward a little bit in Q3 and be steady for the balance of the year. And that does reflect, as you talked about, investments we're making in people. And we continue to make those investments in people and the guidance that I'm sharing in terms of that trajectory allows for some of that. If we're more successful then -- we think in terms of some of those hires, then that might change a little bit. But I think the core NIE rate will, again, come down a little bit and then remain steady for the balance of the year.
Kevin Chapman
executiveMichael, I may just add -- before you hop off, I may just add to that. Jim talked about the new hires, and we've talked about our activity in new hires that we've had going back to Q3 of last year. So just to remind you, in Q1, we had 18 new revenue-producing new hires. In Q2, that number was 5. We added 5. And so, far in Q3, we've added 7. And so we've talked about the opportunities that we've had in the markets to hire talent. We continue to execute on that, and we will continue to look for opportunities to add and augment to our team. And those hires as well as the activity that we're having in our markets from our existing team is showing up in results. Mike, you talked about the loan growth. We talked about the headwinds from the payoffs, the production activity is offsetting the headwinds. I'll just give you a data point of what we're seeing so far in Q3. We've seen elevated payoffs in Q3, but production is outpacing that. And right now, we're up net loans about $40 million, and that's on elevated payoffs. So our teams are continuing to focus on taking market share, serving customers, and that continues to show up in the numbers even as we get into Q3.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question will come from Catherine Mealor with KBW.
Catherine Mealor
analystMoving to the other side of the balance sheet. I know some of the outflows in deposits were seasonal this quarter with public funds. Can you give us any update on what you're seeing on your core underlying deposit trends and expectations for deposit growth in the second half of the year?
James Mabry
executiveCatherine, this is Jim. Maybe I'll start. Go ahead, Kevin.
Kevin Chapman
executiveNo, Jim, you go ahead.
James Mabry
executiveSo a couple of things, and I know Kevin can add some really good color, Catherine, as it relates to some recent trends. But yes, as you noted, seasonal outflows in public funds were really the driver in terms of the change from Q1 to Q2. And as you probably recall from prior quarters with us, we'll start to see those flows reverse here in the second half. And so as opposed to being a headwind, those inflows will be a tailwind. And then I guess, most importantly and really probably to the main point of your question, the underlying performance in core deposits, we're very encouraged about. And so not only do we expect to see the public fund trend shift, but I think the underlying trends in core deposits are really strong. And Kevin, you may want to pick up on that.
Kevin Chapman
executiveSo Catherine, I think if you go back to this call in Q2 back in April, we shared some of the numbers we'd seen at that time about new account openings. And we're interested and excited to see how that would play out through the remainder of the quarter. So just refresh you on what we achieved as far as core deposit growth, looking through that public fund noise. Just core deposit growth and new account openings that we had in Q2, new account openings, new customers to the bank did not have an existing account with us, did not have existing dollars with us, we opened up over 10,000 new accounts in Q2, and that equates to roughly $380 million in new deposits. If you break that down, about half of it was CDs, which means the other half was checking accounts. And we believe those accounts -- those checking accounts are sticky core deposits that we didn't go and get because of rate. We got it due to relationship. And that's also commercial accounts as well as consumer accounts. As we look at that activity into Q3, that activity hasn't slowed down. Just through July, we've opened up over 2,000 net new accounts. And that represents $86 million in new fundings. And some of these accounts, we don't think all the money has moved into yet. We think that those accounts are still being funded. Activity and reassigning deposits or bill pay, all of that activity is still going on, and we expect to continue to see deposits build into some of these accounts as we get into Q3 and Q4.
Catherine Mealor
analystGreat. And then how about the rate on new deposit growth? I assume I guess we saw a couple of basis points increase in deposit costs this quarter. These are [ especially maybe ] the CD piece is coming on with a little bit of a higher rate. Curious maybe where that ended the quarter. And maybe the public funds might mess that up if we're looking at an exit run rate. But curious what you're thinking about deposit cost increases in the next couple of quarters.
James Mabry
executiveYeah...
Kevin Chapman
executiveYes. So our deposits...
James Mabry
executiveGo ahead, Kevin.
Kevin Chapman
executiveYes. Our deposits are coming in at market rates. We're not -- we don't have a special out there. We're not paying above average to get them. I think the weighted average rate of those new accounts are going to be in the high 2s and low 3s.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question will come from Matt Olney with Stephens.
Matt Olney
analystI want to go back to the loan growth discussion and the loan production sounds great. Any more color on loan pricing competition? I think when we talked in April, you highlighted just increasing pressure back then. So curious, any update since that April timeframe?
Kevin Chapman
executiveJim, do you want to talk about new and renewed?
James Mabry
executiveSure. So as you recall, you were talking about April, the pressures that were present then are still there. It is very competitive on both sides. And on the loan side, I think in terms of new and renewed, we're generally looking in the low 6s, Matt. And so, there's certainly a lot of competitive pressures there, and it varies by region, and we're seeing it in certain markets and maybe not so much in others. And the same thing on the deposit side. You saw our costs inched up a bit on deposits, and we do have some tailwinds that will help us in terms of NIM. But yes, those pressures remain as they were back in April.
Matt Olney
analystAnd then I guess as a follow-up, just thinking more about the interest rate sensitivity if the Fed funds were to move up this week or in September, would love to know what your thoughts are as far as the balance sheet and overall impact to higher Fed funds.
James Mabry
executiveI would say that as it relates to the profitability side of that and margin, we don't -- in our outlook, we're not budgeting or planning on any cut or increase as we sit here today. And generally, I would say that a few -- 25 basis points here that's not going to make a big difference in our outlook in terms of the profitability impact. And I would say that's generally be true on the balance sheet in terms of dollars. So absent a meaningful change -- a more meaningful change in rates, I don't see it having a major impact on the balance sheet or the income statement.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question will come from Dave Bishop with Hovde Group.
David Bishop
analystSince Matt opened the door in terms of the NIM discussion, just curious, is the bias for stability still here? Or maybe I think you mentioned maybe some tailwinds on the deposit side, you see a little bit of bias up. Just curious how you're thinking about the margin.
James Mabry
executiveSure. As we discussed in the answer to Matt's question, our outlook is that generally, it's going to be fairly stable for the second half. We've got certainly the deposit pricing pressures. But on the -- I'd say on the asset side, we've got a couple of things working for us. As you probably noted, most of our loan growth in the quarter came at the very end of the quarter. So there's a significant difference between average balances and period-end balances for us, and that will be a nice tailwind going into Q3. The other thing is we've got roughly $1.25 billion in loans that mature over the next 12 months and the rate on that is about 4.95%. So that will be another tailwind that will benefit and help offset deposit pricing pressures. And then lastly, not as significant, but still meaningful, we've got $50 million to $60 million a month rolling off the securities book, and that's coming off at the low 3s, Dave, and coming back on the upper 4s or close to 5%. So we feel good about the outlook of a stable margin, a core stable margin here in the back half.
David Bishop
analystMaybe Kevin or Jim, you talked about the paydowns and the payoff headwinds continuing. Just curious if you could ring-fence maybe what vintages those are coming from? And from a snake-through-the-tunnel perspective, do you think you're in the seventh, eighth inning or still midway through? Just curious how you view the paydown pipeline.
James Mabry
executiveKevin?
Kevin Chapman
executiveYes. So Dave, just what we're seeing in scheduled paydowns or what's been communicated to us, it's largely coming in some commercial real estate, some asset classes. There's been an above-average payoff in some multifamily and some office space. it's also largely coming from the sale of the assets or in some cases, the sale of the business. As we get into Q3, we've seen some early payoffs in our C&I book, and it's really the sale of the underlying business. So it's not as if we're losing any of these loans to competition. We're just -- our borrowers are making decisions to sell collateral, to liquidate collateral. And as they look at redeploying that liquidity, we expect to get first shot at any future opportunity. But largely, this is coming in the commercial -- the payoffs are coming in commercial real estate. And we somewhat anticipated this as rates bottomed out in Q1 that we thought we'd see some elevated payoffs. As the 10-year has increased, we think some of those pressures on the payoffs of commercial real estate subside a little bit in the short run or long run, depending on where the 10-year goes. So we are expecting some easing on the payoffs. But again, it can be very lumpy at the same time as our customers make decisions about the underlying collateral. As far as the -- throughout the book, we're not seeing -- outside of it being commercial real estate, we're not seeing it being concentrated in a certain market or it's runoff from -- it's not run off from the first book. It's really just broad-based, and we're seeing it more mainly in the asset class of commercial real estate.
David Bishop
analystAnd one final question. Kevin, you noted the strong deposit account openings. Just curious if any of that you can point to coming from some of the merger disruption that's been undergoing within your footprint.
Kevin Chapman
executiveSo it's a handful of things, but market disruption is one of those main underliers. Dave, we've had a focus on deposits going back to 2023 that we wanted to continue to maintain a moderate loan-to-deposit ratio in that mid-80% range. So we've had a heightened focus on deposits. And then market opportunity allowed -- market disruption just allowed us to lean into that focus. And look, our teams -- just look at the numbers, our teams responded to the opportunity in the market. And we don't think that opportunity is abating at the moment. We still think there's a lot of disruption and a lot of opportunity. And again -- we may have mentioned this in the past, but we think it is -- we think the fact that we're stable, we're not doing a major merger, we're not going through a transformational integration, we're not reorging the company. All of those play well to where we can just be stable and focus on client needs. And our teams know who their credit partner is, they know who to go to, they know they've got good support in the back office and that they will show well in front of a customer that has uncertainty or may be unhappy where they currently are.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question will come from Janet Lee with TD Cowen.
Sun Young Lee
analystNot to be too nitpicky on the public fund seasonal outflows. When we look at [Technical Difficulty] in the third quarter. So should we expect any of those to come back to the bank in the third quarter or the fourth quarter? I get that you're getting a good traction on the core deposit growth side, but just wanted to see how your forecast pans out in the second half of '26.
James Mabry
executiveJanet, this is Jim. I think our sense is that if you look at deposit growth in the second half, it's going to be -- on both sides, we target whether it's loans or deposits that mid-single-digit growth rate number through the cycle, through the periods. And that outlook really hasn't changed. And so, our expectation is that you're going to see good deposit growth in the second half and public funds will be relatively stable, if not some inflows there.
Sun Young Lee
analystThose public fund deposits, can you give us what the cost there is relative to your average cost of deposits at 1.96%?
James Mabry
executiveIt would be somewhat higher, probably roughly 100 basis points higher, Janet.
Sun Young Lee
analystOkay. Can you share with us the spot cost of deposits at the end of June?
James Mabry
executiveYes, total cost of deposits at the end of June was 1.96%.
Sun Young Lee
analystSo the same as the average for the quarter?
James Mabry
executiveThat's correct.
Sun Young Lee
analystOkay. And lastly, how should we think about -- could you give us a refresh on the Basel III proposal impact to your CET1? And is CET1 range or target beyond 2026?
James Mabry
executiveSo our expectation is it will reduce risk-weighted assets somewhere around $1 billion to $1.3 billion, and that's call it, 55 to 65 basis points positive impact to CET1. And I think we're -- one, we haven't at this point, budgeted that in or projected that in, even though that seems like that's where things are going. But as to how we think about our capital position going forward with that, I don't -- it doesn't change how we look at underlying capital goals. And as you know, we've been -- we'd like CET1 to be in the low 11s. And I don't think that will change. I don't think our outlook on that will change because of this change in the regs. So what implications that's got for capital deployment, we'll see. But I don't think it's going to change the way we think about our capital base and where we want it to be relative to the balance sheet.
Operator
operatorOur next question here will come from Stephen Scouten with Piper Sandler.
Stephen Scouten
analystMaybe one follow-up first on just the expense trajectory. I think, Jim, you said it could potentially go down a little bit into the third quarter. Is that some of the slight jump there in other noninterest earning expense driving some of that? And what was embedded within that increase quarter-over-quarter there in that line item?
James Mabry
executiveSo there were a couple of things. So merit, which certainly we contemplated was part of that increase. There was an increase associated with deferred comp expense. And we don't expect that to be part of the second half. So that will be a benefit. And then health and life, we're self-insured and sometimes those claims will be higher than normal, and they were a little higher in Q2 than we anticipated. So that's why our outlook for the second half is for moderately lower expenses and still baking in, as Kevin has talked about, opportunistic hiring.
Stephen Scouten
analystAnd then on the opportunistic hiring front, I think last quarter, Kevin, you had said, look, there are some markets maybe where we don't feel like we could even have enough people. Any updates on geographically where you would look to add people? And given all the dislocation in your markets and even around your markets, would you look at moving towards Texas at all for LPOs or otherwise to take advantage of that disruption there?
Kevin Chapman
executiveYes, Stephen, our primary focus is mainly building out in our existing footprint. And as it relates to a new market that's all going to be facts and circumstances. There are a couple of markets where we have a presence. We may have a single location, and it's a large market, and we need to build the infrastructure or continue our path or accelerate our path towards more relevance in some of those markets. And I think that's going to be our focus primarily before we go open up a new market, maybe and specifically in the case like Texas. There's a lot that we would need to learn about Texas, great market, great state, economically is outperforming any metric that you can throw at it. But also, I think looking at what it would take to be relevant in some of the markets in Texas, we would have to have significant scale to be relevant in a place like a Dallas or a Houston or San Antonio. And so, I think that -- as it relates to Texas being a primary focus, I would say that's not the case at the moment. We're going to focus more on our existing market and building out more scale, more infrastructure in our existing markets. And I'll also say, not apologizing for our markets as well. The Southeast and the markets that we operate in, those are very high-performing, high inbound migration, high median household income, high economic growth potential. So we feel like we've got ample opportunity in our existing footprint before we go launch and try to go to another market. And again, I think in some of those cases, we'd have to go there in a substantial way to be able to be relevant in some of those markets.
Stephen Scouten
analystAnd then maybe just lastly for me. Curious if you could touch on just lending competition from the standpoint of what you're seeing in terms of aggressiveness from competitors around either rate structure or both if there's a bigger tension point on one or the other? And if any of the -- if any of what you're seeing competitors do gives you maybe trepidation about the ability to hit the growth targets if things just get further down the risk curve than you'd want to be.
James Mabry
executiveKevin, you or [ David ]?
Unknown Executive
executiveStephen, this is [ David ]. So we're seeing those pressures come across a variety of elements. We've talked about and Jim talked about this morning, the pricing pressures and those continue quarter-over-quarter. We're seeing other elements of pressure within our structure from the competition. It could be anything from level of guarantor support on a transaction, proceeds that we have loan, covenants. So it comes in various forms from a competitive sector, which is not -- which is normal as we progress through a competitive environment, it's going to go rate, then it's going to go terms. And so we're starting to see that on terms. To your point about, is that going to impact loan growth, we're going to continue to be disciplined just like we always have on our opportunities. And it's with its customers that we know, markets that we know well, we have good institutional knowledge, both on the front line with the lenders as well as the credit side, the management side. We're going to lean into opportunities with well-known customers to protect those relationships. Particularly where we've got deposits at risk and so forth, we're going to protect those relationships. If it's a new customer, something that we may not be as comfortable with, we may pull back and say we're going to continue to remain disciplined in our terms. It all comes back to that disciplined underwriting that's going to continue to drive our positive credit metrics. So it's a balance. So we're seeing the competition, and we're just going to choose when we lean in and when we don't lean in.
Kevin Chapman
executiveStephen, it's Kevin, I'll just add one last thing too. To your point about the competition, do we think it causes us to relook at our guidance. Short answer is no. And in fact, our guidance is based off of the competition. And we firmly believe that we are and should be a mid-single-digit grower. And that factors in what it takes to be competitive in our markets. And there is competition all around us for good loan growth, and we can be competitive in that. At some point, though, when it comes to rate, there has to be a question, are we getting the proper returns off of the use of that capital? It may look good on the balance sheet that we're showing growth. But long term, it may take us off track from our profitability goals. But as we look at the mid-single digit, we think that allows us to get the proper returns at the proper rate with the proper underwriting. It doesn't put pressure on our funding costs, allows us to keep margins stable. All of that is baked into the math and the calculus behind being a single-digit grower long term. If we press on that, then it can cause -- we may have to change our outlook, maybe not on balance sheet growth, but on margin compression or on profitability, which at this time, we don't feel any need to do that. We think we can grow single digit and hit all of our goals as it relates to increasing and improving profitability, maintaining a stable margin, not outgrowing our funding. All of that is why we come with the basis of the mid-single-digit growth.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question is a follow-up from Matt Olney with Stephens.
Matt Olney
analystA few follow-ups here. On the fee side, haven't heard you guys talk much about the fees this morning. Looks a little bit softer than expectations. I think we typically have a nice seasonal pull-through in 2Q. Anything to call out there in 2Q or the outlook in the near term?
James Mabry
executiveMatt, this is Jim. So I think a couple of things. If you break down the fee income, we had really good SBA numbers in the first half. I do think they were really strong numbers. They'll probably moderate some in the second half, so that will be a headwind. Capital markets has been soft in the first half. And I think we've talked about it in our Q1 call. They were on clip for a record quarter in Q1 and then things dropped off the cliff with the hostilities in the Middle East, but we feel really good about capital markets in the second half and are hopeful that will rebound to historic levels. Mortgage continues to be weak. We don't see anything improving there, and it could be a little bit weaker than what we saw in Q2. Wealth is very steady and growing. And it's an area, too, that I would cite as a beneficiary of some of the dislocation that we're experiencing in our markets. So all in all, I would say that Q2 run rate is probably pretty close to what we'll do in the second half, plus or minus a little bit, but that's probably a good jumping off point for what we see in the second half.
Matt Olney
analystAnd then I guess going back to the expense discussion, I hear your point around the 2Q levels being a little bit elevated due to some of those items that you called out were unusual, a little heavy than what we typically see. I just want to make sure I understand the expectations for the third quarter. I think I heard you say it was going to be lower than what we saw in 2Q. Is there any more you can give us beyond that? Is there a range? Asking just because it's a pretty big range from we saw in the first quarter versus what we saw in the second quarter?
James Mabry
executiveSure. It is. And I would say this, Matt. I don't know -- I do feel good about the -- I think it was $161.5 coming down in Q3. I think the reason I would hedge a little bit on how far it comes down somewhat depends upon the success we have in this opportunistic hiring. We've got some of that baked in. And then some of the -- a couple of the items in Q2 health and life is just a really difficult thing to project. But that was over $1 million in Q2, $1 million more than what it was in Q1. So it's a little tough to project, but we're hopeful and optimistic that it will come down and then stabilize for what we see in Q3 will be a good indicator of what we should see for Q4. I know it's not probably giving you the specificity you want, but I think we were angling towards roughly a $160 million number internally for Q2 when we ended Q1. And I think absent some of these items we've called out, we'd have been right on the mark there.
Matt Olney
analystSeveral moving parts there. So definitely get the view there.
Operator
operatorAnd this concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Kevin Chapman for any closing remarks.
Kevin Chapman
executiveThank you, Joe, and thank you to all of those that have joined us this morning. We appreciate your interest in Renasant and look forward to meeting with you throughout the quarter. Thank you.
Operator
operatorThe conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect your lines.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Renasant Corporation transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Renasant Corporation earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.