Renault SA (RNO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

January 29, 2024

Euronext Paris FR Consumer Discretionary Automobiles special 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#1

Good evening and thank you for joining us for this conference call, which will be hosted by Luca de Meo CEO of Renault Group; and Thierry Pieton CFO of Renault Group. We'll start with a short introduction made by Luca, and then we'll follow with a Q&A session. Luca, the floor is yours.

Luca de Meo

executive
#2

So hi, everyone. So thank you for joining this call, especially in such a short notice. As you know, in 2022, we announced our intention to potentially proceed with an IPO for Ampere. And the contemplated dates, as you probably remember, was in the first half of 2024, but we said depending on market conditions. As previously announced, also Renault Group strategic plan, Renaulution, is self-funded. And results, which will be released for 2023, confirm the group's ability to generate sustainable cash flow to finance its future, including the development of Ampere. Over the last semesters, Renault Group has significantly improved its performance to reach levels above initial expectations. And this offers the group greater flexibility and all the freedom of action it needs. So therefore, considering both stronger cash generation than expected and obviously also the current equity market conditions, we have decided as it's, I think, in a pretty pragmatic way to cancel, and I repeat, to cancel the Ampere IPO process. We think this is in the best interest of Renault Group, of its shareholder and, of course, of Ampere. One thing is very clear to all of us and for me, in particular, with Ampere, we have, in the meantime, created a business that is unique in its kind. The IPO project has been a sort of accelerate, allowing us to set it up in record times. We have created a start-up mindset in the company, which allow us to constantly improve and innovate. And this is exactly, what will make Ampere successful in its very challenging environment. Today, we are, I think, also more determined than ever to build the success. We think the Ampere is, first and foremost, an industrial project. And actually, it's the most substantiated answer of the European automotive industry to the challenges coming from West and East and to boost EV democratization in Europe. So since the beginning of November, when we carved it out, Ampere has been operating. And we can now observe day after day the performance and speed that this model and this organizational model generates. We are rolling out our strategy as planned. We are on schedule, when it comes to our 40% cost-reduction road map, and the cost for the Twingo will be, for example, 40% cheaper than the one of the Renault 5. The team is now focused also on ensuring the success of the other 2 crucial launches this year that we'll have in spring and summer. This is the Scenic and the Renault 5, and we have actually already very, very good feedbacks. And of course, the team is also focused on reducing development time, mastering the technology and putting innovation at the core of Ampere. So let me conclude by reminding you that Ampere is also now a key element of Renault Group strategy and next-gen organization. It's 1 among the team of 5 focused businesses that we have set up to address each one of the major automotive value chains. The organization is designed to capture value, where it is today in automotive landscape, not only where it used to be traditionally. And it gives Renault Group an asset that pure players actually don't have: flexibility and the ability to adapt to the changing pace of the shift to EV. So as you will see in few days, it is already demonstrating its ability to take this company, where it has never been before. So thank you for your attention on this quick introduction. And I'll leave it to Thierry and me, of course, to open to your question. I want to involve you, Thierry, also on the exercise. Thank you very much.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#3

Thank you very much, Luca. The first question will come from Albertina from Bloomberg.

Albertina Torsoli

analyst
#4

Can you hear me?

Luca de Meo

executive
#5

Yes, we hear.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#6

Yes.

Albertina Torsoli

analyst
#7

Okay. Two questions, Luca. The first is why now? It's quite still early on. Obviously, if you were to launch an IPO in May, you would have to start making road shows now. But still, like, for example, this week, there will be a Sodexo spin-off. So that will probably test the appetite for French IPOs. And so just curious as why the decision of today. Second question is one of the reasons the fact that you are in talks with Volkswagen on the EV platform for the Twingo, so you actually do not need the IPO because you have cash coming in from Volkswagen and potentially other partners for the development of the platform?

Luca de Meo

executive
#8

Well, I think, there is the reason why we're doing it now is that in the process, you know that there is a standard process, but the most important thing is that we are realizing more and more the performance of the group is getting better and better. And of course, Thierry will tell you more in a few days about what was '23 for us. And then compared to the initial, let's say, assumption we had 2 years ago, when we announced the Ampere project and potentially the IPO, I think that the cash generation of this company has changed at another level. And that allows us to finance completed approach, including the cash burn that we had anticipated in the first 18 months of Ampere's life. So I think we don't need to go in that direction, and we don't do it. This is basically explanation, and it's better to do it now. We can focus the team on executing each one of the pieces of the puzzles, which is actually happening. And we don't get distracted from other things because we can afford it. On -- I wouldn't comment on the Volkswagen thing, so we have talks to some OEMs. Because the whole idea of the A segment EV platform is a very good idea. We have a very good technical base. We have ability to produce and manufacture cars. We're going to do the car in a very -- in a record time in terms of development. But there's -- you can't link the 2 things basically, if -- just to answer for your question, there's nothing to do with the decision we made. Decision we made is that we realize now that we have all the resources to continue the project on Ampere. You want to do [indiscernible]?

Thierry Piéton

executive
#9

Yes. Just want you to come back on the project...

Albertina Torsoli

analyst
#10

Sorry, but you confirm that there are talks with some OEMs on EV platform development?

Luca de Meo

executive
#11

I'm telling you that the concept of the Twingo is characteristic. It's actually intriguing a few OEMs that so far don't have a solution for that. You know my fight for revamping the segment of small urban cars because I think with electric technology, we can both provide something that is relevant for consumer, at the same time, with the new electric architecture, maybe new type of batteries, et cetera, we can actually prove that we are able to make money with more car, which is not the case with a traditional ICE taking into account all the regulations. So I think that the switch to electric opens up again the opportunity to bring affordable [ urban ] cars for the people that they need. They used to be 10%, 15% of European market, right? And it's going down because of the current regulation on ICE cars. But it changed everything with electric. So we become intriguing for them because we're trying to reopen that handle this year.

Thierry Piéton

executive
#12

And I think to come back on the funding question because it's obviously a key element in the decision making, when we got the Renaulution plan, we had a couple of objectives. The first one was the recovery of the performance of the business. But on the longer term, what we wanted to do is fund the structure that we're putting in place, so [ Fund Horse and Opel ] return to investment grade and gradually raise the dividend; and be able to grow the company in that way. When we built Renaulution, we had already built it in a fashion that wasn't dependent on the IPO. But if we look at the cash generation, since we built that plan, in 2022 versus the initial guidance of EUR 1 billion of free cash flow, we did EUR 2.1 billion. So that was a EUR 1.1 billion upside. This year, we started with a guidance of EUR 2 billion and now we have a guidance of EUR 2.5 billion. We're not going to come off that guidance obviously. So in a couple of years, it's EUR 1.6 billion of incremental cash flow that we generated. So now we have the firm capability to fund the structure, to return to investment grade and the schedule that we're hoping for and to raise the dividend at the same time without having to go on the market to raise additional funds and without diluting the shareholders at the group level. And so, I think, it's the right responsible decision to make. We have an opportunity just to do everything that we were planning on doing with the upside of the cash generation that we now have, which is sustainable and it's going to continue in the future.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#13

Now we have a question from Peter Campbell from Financial Times.

Peter Campbell

analyst
#14

Two, if I may. Did investor concerns over the current European EV slowdown play any part in this decision? And second, and this is more of a kind of a personal question, you've obviously put a lot of your personal credibility as the Renault CEO into this IPO drive. Do you feel in any way that, that might have been damaged by, say, its decision? And is that going to change the way that you think about your leadership of the company in the future?

Luca de Meo

executive
#15

No. I think that my credibility, of course, is in the overall equation that we are building with different variables on Renault. I think that so far, the -- what we did in Renault was pretty unexpected, I have to say. We're going to bring the company this year at the level that it has never achieved in 125 years. It's not a decision on the IPO or not IPO that I guess will impact my credibility, not only my credibility but the credibility of the whole team, which is more important. So I don't think so. At the end of the day, what is important is that we continue to develop Ampere. I think that Ampere is a very, very solid case. In fact, everything that we have started is going the direction we want to go on manufacturing, on engineering, on the launch of the cars, on the cost side. So I can reassure any -- let's say, any journalist and any analyst that it's -- we are completely on track with what we wanted to do. And I think that even the process of IPO, in fact, accelerated the thing because we had kind of an ideal deadline in front of us, and it pushed the teams to take a lot of good decision. So I see it pretty positive so far. Is the context influencing the decision? I think it's one of the elements because, I mean, we would be -- being totally blind and not looking left and right would have been not totally responsible as a management of team. I think there is a swing on the other side -- on the opposite side with EV, which I consider honestly pretty childish. Because 3 years ago, everybody was telling us that, if we would not go 100% EV, we would have been a bunch of zombies in 10 years. And now everybody is telling that we shouldn't do EV because, whatever, the profitability, the thing, et cetera, et cetera. I think we need to get to -- people like us, they have to keep cool heads all the time. I think that EV will be a dominant technology in Europe because of regulation, okay, and not because of the 2035 ban. A lot of people forget that we have the CAFE in the middle. So 2025, we need to achieve 95 grams CO2 in average for the fleets, okay? 2030, it's 50, okay? And you know that even if you take one of the best combustion engine in Europe, a small hybrid from Renault or Toyota or et cetera, it's actually 80 grams. So you don't need to be a Nobel price in mathematics to understand that you need the big parts of zero-emission cars. So electric car is a train that's already left the station. And Ampere will be one of the drivers for Renault to be one of the champions, when it comes to decarbonization. So the project continues. I think that what is important is that Ampere proves all the numbers and the target we gave ourself. And the IPO is a side dish into this story for me.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#16

We'll now take some questions from sell-side analysts. [indiscernible] from Bernstein.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#17

A couple, if I may. Firstly, have you seen recently any kind of diverging performance from your EV or your ICE models in terms of order books, pricing discounts, et cetera? And secondly, presumably, there are some cases of additional cash burn from Ampere onto Renault's own books. Does that push back your anticipated ratings upgrade? Or is that safe at this point?

Luca de Meo

executive
#18

Do you want to answer the second one?

Thierry Piéton

executive
#19

Sure. Do you want me to start with the cash burn?

Luca de Meo

executive
#20

Yes.

Thierry Piéton

executive
#21

Yes. So look, no, again, part of the decision for calling the IPO off is the fact that we're actually generating more cash. So we're in a situation, where we can achieve all the goals that we had set to ourself ahead of schedule without having to go to the market. So it's very short answer: absolutely not, it doesn't postpone the schedule that we had set to ourselves. In fact, we remain ahead and will continue to do so.

Luca de Meo

executive
#22

I think that since, let's say, second half of last year, we haven't seen fundamental shifts of the dynamics of the EV segment in terms of, let's say, pricing or in terms of residual value. It's actually, since a few months, a little bit more complicated for everybody, okay? You look at things like -- but it's actually changing geographically because one of the -- for example, the decision was made in Germany to take off subvention, I think, of course, had an impact. But on the other side, you have France that is pushing with some ventures, and the market is very dynamic. So all in all, I think we are on track with what we were planning for this year. And we're really looking forward to get Scenic and then Renault 5 into the market. These are 2 products that not everybody has, okay? And they come from Ampere. And I think that both products will contribute to democratize EV in Europe. And democratize means you have to sell volumes, okay? And both cars are, in my opinion, especially the Renault 5 platforms, what we call the CMF BEV is the first small car next-generation platinum pure EV in Europe. And we are 2 years ahead of any competitor. So I count a lot on the fact that whether Renault 5, the Alpine, or the Alpine 5 or the [indiscernible] the Renault 4 be a success. That's what we're going to do. And I mean it's a complicated environment for -- in general, right? So -- but I think that's Renault, as we said many times, this year might be some kind of anti-cyclical because of the product effect. We have 10 launches in 1 year and never happened in the last 20 years for Renault. So it's our time to gain market share because of the product offense.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#23

We now have a question from Pushkar Tendolkar, HSBC.

Pushkar Tendolkar

analyst
#24

Just Luca, you mentioned about the feedback for the Scenic and the Renault 5. If you can just confirm that the feedback or the orders for those particular cars, that has not had any input into the cancellation of the Ampere IPO decision? That's my first question. And second is on just the less stricter Euro 5 -- sorry, Euro 7 regulations. Do you think that that's going to prolong the life of ICE, and therefore, the BEVs will probably have a slower adoption and your -- all your targets then move to the right? Is that possible?

Luca de Meo

executive
#25

I think that for Scenic and Renault 5, it's too early to make an estimation on the orders because we haven't actually opened the orders of the thing. So for -- basically, for both cars. So Scenic is not yet into everywhere in the dealer network. So it's too early. We have to wait for Scenic maybe, I would say, 3, 4 months. And for the Renault 5, it will be fully sold in something like September just after the summer. So we'll have to wait maybe end of this year, beginning of next year to understand the full potential of the thing. Of course, we have a feeling based on feedback that's coming from dealer network or medias, specialized medias or simply social media. And we clearly feel that those cars have a lot of potential, okay? That's for sure. But there is no quantitative. And for sure, it didn't influence the decision on the -- I repeat: the decision was mainly motivated by the fact that we realized that we had the money to do it and that this cash generation will be sustainable for Renault. And that's why we did it, okay? Your second question was about...

Thierry Piéton

executive
#26

Euro 7.

Luca de Meo

executive
#27

Yes. Look, I think that Euro 7 kind of cancellation because you have to understand that Euro 7 was not canceled totally. We have a few things that are still part of the roles that will be given to us. For sure, it was postponed because initially -- the first initial scenario was mid of 2025. So the thing will start beginning of 2027, okay? So in our planning, of course, it leaves us a little bit from spending the money, et cetera. But you still have things like particulate on brakes, attrition on tires, onboard diagnostics, et cetera, on which we will have to continue to work. So it's not that Euro 7 went away totally, okay? A part of it went away, substantial parts. And then the deadline was pushed back, okay? So it brings us a little bit of relief. It means technically that you can continue with some engine combination a little bit longer, okay? That means that maybe we'll sell a little bit more of ICE cars in '25 and in '26, okay? But I repeat, just want to let you understand the logical thing, we have CAFE. So don't look only at the emission thing. We have to respect the average of the fleet in '25 and in 2030, okay? So it's even before '27, right? And it's pretty challenging for everybody, okay? And if you don't respect that, then you're going to have to pay a lot of fines. So that's why this is a motivation for us to keep pushing BEVs because basically, a BEV is worth 100 ICE, if you look the -- if you make the math, right? One BEV is worth 100 ICE. And that's why we have to push. And finally, I have to say, we are all committed to decarbonize transportation. So I think it's a good thing. It's a battle worth fighting also for the future and the future generation. So we are in the battle of -- I mean everybody now is kind of doubting about the thing, et cetera, et cetera. I think it's not -- honestly, it's not very balanced to have this kind of swift, right? So we -- the industry is engaged in decarbonization. We are putting -- I think the European industry putting already like EUR [ 250 ] billion on ecological transition. So now we have to make it happen, yes? And EV is a very good thing. And EV -- a small EV is even better, and that's the home turf of Renault, since 125 years. So we have a great opportunity, I think.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#28

Thank you, Luca. We now have a question from Philippe Houchois, Jefferies.

Philippe Houchois

analyst
#29

My question is the decision not to do the IPO. How does that impact the discussion you've had with Nissan, Mitsubishi and potentially Qualcomm about becoming shareholders in Ampere?

Luca de Meo

executive
#30

Thierry, you want to...

Thierry Piéton

executive
#31

Yes. Sure. So look, if you start with Nissan and Mitsubishi, when we did the investment agreement with Nissan and Mitsubishi, that was in the contract and alternative investment agreement. So the case was contemplated. And Nissan expressed the wish to potentially be able to invest regardless of whether we do the IPO or not. And obviously, we welcome that. And so it's something that we're going to have to discuss with a partner now. But it was contemplated in the contract, and there is an agreement in place that would allow for the investment regardless of the IPO or not. This is not the case for Qualcomm. So the investment from Qualcomm was dependent on the IPO. So we've obviously informed Qualcomm now of our decision. And we'll have to discuss what it means with them, whether they want to participate in some other shape or form or if we keep it the way it is.

Philippe Houchois

analyst
#32

Right. But that means there will be some dilution of existing shareholders, if Nissan comes in that is going to happen?

Thierry Piéton

executive
#33

There would be, if Nissan comes in, which is one of the elements that we need to discuss, yes.

Philippe Houchois

analyst
#34

But if I confirm that, that Nissan will come in or not? That's what I'm trying to understand.

Thierry Piéton

executive
#35

The contract allows for Nissan to come in. Whether they come in or not, when we just have to apply the contract is something that we need to discuss given that this discussion is only being announced today.

Philippine de Schonen

executive
#36

We'll take the last question, which is a question from [indiscernible].

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#37

Just 2 quick questions, if I may. Regarding the Nissan and Qualcomm question, on Mitsubishi, is Mitsubishi also part of the contract with the possibility for them to come in even if the IPO doesn't happen? And a more general question, I still don't understand what decided you not to go ahead with the IPO, sorry? Because you always said that it was a must-have for Ampere, but that it was important to get visibility and to help put a real value on Renault. And what decided you to call it off so early in the year because you had a few months to take that decision before calling it off?

Luca de Meo

executive
#38

[ Gum ], I never said that it was a must -- I'm so sorry, [ Sheila ]. I never said that there was a must. Of course, it could have been an interesting scenario.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#39

I meant a nice-to-have. Sorry, nice-to-have.

Luca de Meo

executive
#40

Nice-to-have is different from must. Now we've taken this decision and I repeat it to make it very simple is that we have the money to push the project as it is without having to go to the market. I think it's also good news. It tells you that behind the machine is working, it's generating enough cash. So we made the decision because of availability of cash to do this. And we look at the context, which is not the ideal one on the EV market today. The conversation is going probably right now in the wrong direction, I believe. So it's probably not time to do it.

Thierry Piéton

executive
#41

And for the MMC, you got Mitsubishi part of the question of the agreement with Mitsubishi is exactly the same as Nissan. So they're committed to invest regardless of the IPO. So it's something that we'll have to discuss with them as well, same agreement.

Luca de Meo

executive
#42

So I think it was the last. And so I thank you very much for spending your evening with us. As I said, Ampere is -- I think it's a wonderful industrial project, and much is going to happen in the next month. So we move on. We executed our plan. We stay focused. This is important. So take care. Have a nice evening. And of course, the press and Investors Relation team are totally available, if you have additional curiosity and questions. Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Renault SA transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Renault SA earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.