Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 20, 2020

NASDAQ US Materials Metals and Mining conference_presentation 21 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#1

Hi. I'm Josh Wolfson from RBC Capital Markets. Here to present is Bill Heissenbuttel, President and CEO of Royal Gold. Bill's been with Royal Gold for -- since 2006 and brings more than 30 years of corporate finance experience to the company. We'll start with a Q&A and take any questions if there are any.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#2

So first off, Bill, perhaps if you could review with us, how has COVID affected Royal Gold's day-to-day business?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#3

Yes. Thanks, Josh, and thanks for agreeing to serve as the moderator of this session. I sort of look at it from 2 perspectives. Number one is an internal perspective, where I think COVID-19 has had very little impact. And I'm talking specifically with respect to our offices, our employees. Thankfully, we have not been touched by COVID-19 directly. And if you think about our business, it actually lends itself quite easily to working remotely. In fact, we have 27 employees across 4 offices. My Head of Operations, my Head of Investor Relations, my Head of Business Development, all work in different locations. So we've effectively been working remotely for years. I will say that the folks here in Denver, who have been working from home, have done an excellent job, and I don't think we've missed a beat at all. With respect to the portfolio itself, we did have some initial disruptions. We had Rainy River, we shut down. Peñasquito and Dolores, due to the Mexican restrictions, we shut down. And we had -- Milligan actually cut back from a production perspective. But I'd say these were all relatively short term. I know Golden Star has had some COVID-19 management issues there. They've had some cases, but it seems that they've done a very good job with that. So I'm happy to report that we really haven't -- we haven't had much of an impact for a couple of months now.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#4

It's very good to hear. So at the end of the June quarter, Royal Gold had announced that the company was first in a net cash position. And with gold prices having increased, our estimates are that company will generate in excess of $300 million after paying its dividend. Naturally, what's Royal Gold going to do with all this excess cash that it's generating these days?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#5

Yes. So we -- when we look at capital allocation right now, we're really looking at 3 things. One is our Khoemacau investment, which we are still in the midst of. I think currently, we have about $147 million invested. If they were to take us to the maximum investment there, we would have a little bit north of $100 million left to invest between now and, say, the middle to -- second to third quarter of next year. After that, one of the things that you may recall is that we drew down on our revolver credit when COVID-19 occurred. We had no idea of what the impact might be on our portfolio. We had commitments, and we wanted to be certain to have enough liquidity just in case we lost half the portfolio. Thankfully, we haven't. But we still have $275 million outstanding on that revolving credit. As we get further and further into the Khoemacau investment, I would expect us to pull that back and pay it down. But as I look forward 12 months, which has always been the standard I use for a liquidity cushion of over $100 million of Khoemacau. We've got about $25 million in G&A. We've got a little over $70 million in dividends. So that's $200 million that we're looking at over the next 12 months is being spent. So that's really where we're focused. And with respect to the dividend, I think you know that our Board typically takes up the dividend in November of each year. So that will be front of mind at our next Board meeting. So those are the 3 areas. Beyond that, let's see what happens with the precious metal prices in terms of our cash flow. I will say I've never -- I've gotten the question a lot over the years, and I have never been in a position where I had so much cash, I had no idea what to do with it. It might be an interesting position to be in, but we're not there yet.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#6

Got it. Maybe back to the comments on the dividend and I guess the current problem that you have of having too much cash. When we look historically what the dividend has been, it's represented about 40% of free cash flow, but with higher gold prices today, by our estimate, it's about 25% of free cash flow. How does the company set its dividend policy? And how do you look at increasing it with that sort of presenting risk that if the gold price were to decrease, you wouldn't put yourself in a position where you'd have to revaluate it while the price is lower?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#7

Yes. Your question is quite appropriate for us because we don't have a specific policy. We certainly don't have a specific free cash flow payout ratio. What we have been trying to do for years is provide a consistently increasing dividend but when that's sustainable. And if you start chasing payout ratios, I think you run into a risk if metal prices do fall, where you're going to have to pull that back. As you know, we've paid an increasing dividend for 19 years. And one of the things we started to talk about is if you get to 25 years, you start to become a dividend aristocrat, not in the index terms because I think you have to be part of the S&P 500, but it's something -- it's a goal that we've got that we would really like to achieve. The thing -- the other thing I would just point you to is go back in our history to the last time the gold price ran. And you will actually see some relatively significant percentage increases in our dividend as gold price, so the first time they went to $1,800. And then when the gold price came off to the early part of, what, 2012, 2013, you saw much lower dividend rate increases because the gold price had come off. And I think there's a lesson there not to chase the gold price if you want something to be sustainable. So I think any dividend increase that you see, I think, will be measured. And it won't be -- we're in the $1,900-per-ounce gold environment, and we can do something very significant. Again, our goal is increasing and sustainable.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#8

And on the topic of dividends, would the company ever consider special dividends in the event that there was windfall gains? Or is that maybe not as consistent with that consistently increasing policy?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#9

Yes. Again, we've certainly talked about things like that, things like stock buybacks and special dividends. I can't tell you we've ever come to a decision on which would be better for our shareholders. But to your point, if we did find ourselves in an excess liquidity position by quite a bit, that would certainly be something we would talk about internally with the Board. And we've just never been there, so I can't really tell you what we would do or what we wouldn't do.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#10

Got it. Relative to some of your peers, which have talked about a very robust transaction outlook, how would you characterize the outlook for transactions today?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#11

Yes. There's a consistency to business development in this business. This industry always needs capital. And I would say since the financial crisis, and particularly since 2015, we've become much more of a mainstream source of capital. So we get to look at a lot more than we used to. I still say we always compare ourselves to 2015 and say it's not as good. I would say 2015 was unique. And so I'm very happy with the flow. I understand that there is a frustration when we talk about and our competitors talk about a great market. We're seeing lots of opportunities, and then there are no deals that are announced. And unfortunately, our business isn't a quarter-to-quarter, we're going to do so many transactions per quarter. I think you've heard us give the history of Khoemacau, where we were in discussions with Cupric Canyon for 2 years before that deal was announced. And there are ongoing discussions right now with companies that have -- actually, we've been in contact with for longer. These things take time. And I know it's hard to be -- for us, sometimes it's hard for us to be patient. Sometimes it's hard for investors to be patient. But there's no calendar we can set to this. I will say there are a couple of -- a few things working against us right now: number one, the bid-ask spread on the metal prices. If you're a streaming -- if gold is $1,900, and how many streaming companies are you going to find that are going to use $1,900 to value their streams, whereas if you're an operator selling that gold stream? Probably you'd love to get that price in the valuation. And any time you have a big spread between the current spot price and the consensus price, like you're going to have a harder time getting to a middle ground on valuation. So that's a bit of a hurdle. I would say low interest rates have certainly made the debt markets of interest to companies that can access those markets. We have seen some equity markets become available for certain companies. Clearly, that is a source of competition for us. And when it comes to operating companies, as you say, we're not the only ones that have increased cash flows. And as companies have these increased cash flows, they may not need third-party financing. So we've got a few headwinds that we're working with, but again, I am happy with the volume of opportunity we're seeing.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#12

Good to hear. From some of the competitors you have, there's been an interest or appetite for doing very large transactions in the work, billion dollars spent in -- thrown in or added a couple of times. The company has or Royal Gold has billion dollars of liquidity today. Would you feel comfortable putting that much capital to work in a single transaction? Or would you feel better looking at sort of smaller opportunities?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#13

Yes. And I think when you talk about our competitors that have talked about those larger transactions, I think they have a potentially a harder growth target or growth hurdle. They need those large transactions for them to be material, show up in their revenue stream. We don't necessarily need that. To your question, I would be comfortable putting $1 billion into one transaction based on our current liquidity, but that's very much dependent on the asset that we're talking about. I think to put $1 billion, it would have to be cash flowing for us to do it. I just -- I couldn't see us allocating $1 billion to a project that won't produce revenue for 3 or 4 years. That might be a bit of an issue. The other thing is we have been trying so hard to diversify our revenue sources over the past few years. And what you don't want to do is put $1 billion into something that suddenly creates a new diversification problem or issue that you then have to address. So we'd be comfortable going up to that limit based on our current liquidity, but it would be very, very case specific.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#14

Got it. On the topic of diversification, when Mount Milligan first started production, that was a large concentration risk for the company on the order of 35% or so. Today, it's down to 25%. What do you see as being the right offer limit today for maximum exposure to any one particular asset?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#15

Yes. There's no one number, but you're right. We have been very focused on our concentration at Milligan. I mean just look at what happens to our share price if they have a water availability issue or they undertake a new technical report. It has an impact, and the more diversified we can be, the better. I would say a goal internally would be to get everybody under 20%, but beyond that, keep going. Get it under 15%. The more diversified we can be, the less susceptible we are to one particular asset having a hiccup.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#16

Good to hear. In general, when we're in an environment, like perhaps we're in today, where maybe there's a bit of a bid-ask spread between buyers and sellers for streaming transactions, what do you view as there being opportunities for royalty companies to create value for shareholders?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#17

Yes. We -- in my discussions with our investors, we get questions like, well, would you go into other commodities? Would you expand into base metals? Would you expand into oil? And I will -- what I've heard from our investors is we're quite happy with the focus on precious metals. Our revenue is under 90% -- just under 90% in terms of gold and silver. And I think what I hear from investors is be patient. Don't chase a new strategy trying to increase value because I'm not sure I'd actually increase value if I suddenly launched a new product line, if you will, or a new focus on a commodity. So staying the course, I think, is really what I'm hearing from investors, and be patient. So I don't feel like we need to do anything if we're in this period where there might be a lull between transactions.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#18

Got it. In recent years, we've seen a number of new entrants into the royalty space, both private and public. How would you characterize the competitive outlook today for royalty companies?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#19

Yes. The competition has always been -- has always existed in this space. And I'll take you back a decade ago, and it was Wheaton and Franco, it with us. And it was International Royalty, and it was Silverstone and it was called Wheaton. And what happened at that point in time is the bigger companies took out those smaller companies. And I don't want to speak for Franco or Wheaton, but I will say IRC wasn't our best transaction. And I'm sure those guys would say they also uncovered some things buying those portfolios. So right now, with all of these companies that have been formed, I don't see Royal Gold being in a position where just adding a portfolio makes a lot of sense. If we're going to add a portfolio, there ought to be something in there that we covet, if you will, sort of a cornerstone asset. And so what you have now is I think you've got the larger companies really focused on asset-specific transactions, not so much industry consolidation. And so you do have sort of this perception of there, a lot of people in this market competing for the same thing. I also -- I view the industry as a bit bifurcated. I sort of look at the Mavericks and the Nomads and everybody else that's been formed in the last couple of years. They're fighting for the smaller transactions. And then you've got sort of Franco, Wheaton, us, Osisko, Sandstorm and certainly Triple Flag competing for, what I would say, are the larger transactions. And again, I go back -- it doesn't matter if you've got 3 or 4 or 5 competitors. If you have that many, every transaction of quality is going to attract significant competition. So I don't see it being that different.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#20

Got it. When you think about Royal Gold versus its peers, how does the company differentiate itself either through its day-to-day sort of course -- normal-course business or through the pilot structures, transactions?

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#21

Yes. We would like -- we try to position ourselves as the folks you turn to when there's not complexity. There's a difficult -- there's something -- there's a challenge that you need to solve, a problem you want to solve with the structure. Where we don't tend to do very well is when the competition is solely based on price. And it's just a matter of how low can you go. That's not where we excel. Where we excel is someone comes to us and says, "I don't even know if you guys can do it. This is what we need. This is our unique situation. The only way a stream works is if you can fit it into our current balance sheet, our current bank relationships," and that's where I think we try to set ourselves apart by coming up with those things, but not taking undue risk when we structure.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#22

Got it. Yes. Similarly, along those lines, I think I've noticed debt as part of certain transactions more recently, which seems like a strength that you have available. Back to the topic of IRC and the other acquisitions that were done, could you comment on how that scenario materialized for Royal Gold? And today, if you were evaluating a stream versus an operating company, how you differentiate reviewing either of those opportunities? When you mentioned it was not -- it was less appealing.

William Heissenbuttel

executive
#23

Yes. So at the time IRC became attractive to us because Barrick had approved Pascua. Barrick was building Pascua-Lama. And what that allowed us to do was really point to a precious metals-focused revenue stream eventually as opposed to having a revenue stream completely dominated by Voisey's Bay. So that was really the trigger that got us talking to the company. I think the other thing that happened at that time was the global financial crisis really hit IRC hard. They didn't have the base metal focus, and it just seemed like an opportune time. Now when you talk about buying one asset versus buying a portfolio, the issue is if I can buy an asset, even if I'm paying a very low discount rate, it's at a discount to that value. Even though IRC share price had been hit quite hard in the market, we ended up paying a significant premium. And I would say, a premium on a premium, which is what you're going to do if you try to consolidate in this industry. I'm not sure. I haven't seen, and I'm not sure you're going to get a lot at-the-market mergers in our space because they're -- because we tend to trade at volatile and high premiums. If you happen to not be in favor at that point in time, doing it at the market is sort of hard to do. So my preference is always going to be to try to build the company asset by asset. I think we can do that. I'm not saying we won't be involved in consolidation, but it's not something we spend a lot of time focusing on right now.

Joshua Wolfson

analyst
#24

Well, I believe that's all the time we have today. Thank you very much, Bill, for your time. We hope the audience enjoyed this discussion with Royal Gold.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Royal Gold, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Royal Gold, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.