Sareum Holdings plc (SAR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 4, 2022
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Mark Swallow
attendeeGood morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Sareum Holdings plc investor presentation. [Operator Instructions]. Before we begin, we would like to submit the following poll. And if you affect your kind attention, I'm sure the company will be most grateful. And I'd now like to hand over to Non-Executive Chairman, Dr. Stephen Parker. Good morning, sir.
Stephen Parker
executiveGood morning, and good morning to everybody on the line. Great welcome to join us for this update as a result of results of the recent CTA submission plans our period ends at the end of June. Tim Mitchell, our CEO, will take you through the headlines. And then John Reader, our CSO, will talk in a little bit more depth about the science side. And then we will be able to take questions at the end of that. So if you already submitted questions, we will try and get through as many as we can. If you haven't, there is the opportunity to do so, although at short notice, we may have to hold questions on the day and submit them back as written answers via the website more or less at a later stage. So with that, I'll hand over to Mitchell.
Tim Mitchell
executiveThank you, Steven. Yes, good morning, everybody. Thank you for joining our presentation today. As Stephen said, you may have noticed last week, we announced by RNS that we've submitted at the CTA respiratory clinical trials authorization application for our SDC-1801 autoimmune disease candidate. And really, the purpose of this meeting is to give a little bit more details around our program? And answer any questions you have. So as Stephen said, presenting today is myself, Tim Mitchell, Chief Executive and one of the co-founders and John Reader, Chief Scientific Officer; and the other Co-Founder of the company. For those of you who are new to the company, then I'll start with a quick overview. We're a clinical stage small molecule drug development company by developing next-generation kinase inhibitors. So kinases are a class of cellular machinery that regulate many biological processes. And we have a particular focus on autoimmune diseases and cancers. So we're led by a highly experienced team with particular expertise in kinase inhibition, decades of experience in general R&D and also in public company management. Our current drug development pipeline is focused on the JAK cell signaling family, and we'll talk in a bit more detail about that later. But it comprises 4 members, TYK2, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and they're all important in maintaining healthy immune systems. So our strategy is to develop these programs into the late preclinical or early clinical stages before we license or partner them with a pharmaceutical major -- and while we do that, we maintain a lean cost base. We had a small executive team, and we use trusted third-party providers to maximize our return on investment. So some of our recent highlights are shown here. As I said, well, the main focus is on SDC-1801. This is the TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor for autoimmune diseases. We have -- we've noted in the RNS that we've got a particular focus now on psoriasis, which is a skin disease. So the CTA application for a Phase I AB clinical trial, we submitted last week -- so the plan is to initiate clinical trials firstly, in healthy volunteers so that we can understand the dose levels and any safety issues with the compound and then in psoriasis patients. And we're looking to start this trial by the end of this year. So we'll look to dose up to 120 volunteers and patients in total, and we'll recruit these at a site in Manchester in England. Earlier in the year, we announced that the toxicology studies to start these trials have been completed. We were waiting on the drug products and the drug substance. So the drug stops inside that's the sort of the raw material 1801 material. That's now complete. The capsule formulation that the volunteers and patients will actually take that's also been completed, and it's currently undergoing quality control. So we're on track for this year-end start. And then just a couple of points on SDC-1802. So this is a separate molecule that also targets TYK2/JAK1. This is our cancer and cancer immunotherapy program. We're continuing to undertake our translational studies just to work out in which particular cancers we should best use this compound -- and then we also noted that the IP portfolio has been strengthened with the granting of a patent in the European Union. And then for the SRA737 Chk1 program. So this is a program that was licensed to Sierra Oncology. The news here is that Sierra have been acquired by GSK, and that was in April this year. So we're waiting to hear from GSK as to what their plans are for any future development of SRA737, and obviously, we'll update you as soon as we hear anything from them. And then also in the RNS of last week, we noted our year-end financial position. So it's a cash of GBP 4.3 million. Okay. So let's move on to our JAK program. So the TYK2/JAK1 programs, where we have our particular kinase inhibition expertise. And I'll hand over to John to take you through that.
John Reader
executiveThank you, Tim. So Jack family, as Tim has alluded to, is very important in the signaling of key immunoregulatory cytokines, so hope to maintain this healthy balanced immune system. The 2 members of the family of particular interest to us, TYK2 and JAK1. They are involved in a signaling pathway this is frequently deregulated in multiple autoimmune diseases, one of which is psoriasis and will be the focus of our Phase Ib trial. Inhibition of both TYK2 and JAK1 has the potential to get superior efficacy compared with agents with just 1 of the 2 kinases. If you look at the cartoon, you'll see, for example, that interferon also the third cytokine from the left there users both TYK2 and JAK1. And by inhibiting both of those, we think we can have a really profound inhibition of that interferon alpha signaling pathway. TYK2 and JAK1 are all therefore, optimal targets for autoimmune diseases, targeting 2 other members of the JAK family, JAK2 and JAK3 has led to some unwanted side effects in patients. So from the beginning, we've been keen to avoid inhibition of those 2 kinases and SDC-1801 has the right balance and potency and sale activity unlike the JAK family that we are looking for. So the inhibition of these H2 kinases is of great interest in the industry and increasing interest. There's a lot of activity, a large amount of commercial focus on the JAK family as a whole and strong clinical validation from big players such as BMS and Pfizer for TYK2 selective and dual TYK2/JAK1 molecules in both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. There's a number of mid- and late-stage clinical trials of TYK2 and dual inhibitors from BMS. The Pfizer molecule, which has been picked up by a new company called Priovant. And they have trials ongoing in lupus ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, vitiligo and dermatomyositis, for range of dermal and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Readouts are expected over the next 2 or 3 years. There's also scientific evidence for a role in the modulation of the severe inflammatory responses and respiratory symptoms arising from viral infections such as COVID-19. And 2 JAK family inhibitors are already approved for certain COVID-19 patients. And I mentioned the growing commercial focus. BMS are forecasting sales in excess of $4 billion of our TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib in 2029. So as you know, we are focused on selective and potent TYK2/JAK1 inhibitors. There are significant opportunities available to us in this area. Currently, no marketed products with selectivity for TYK2. So it's a recent target for therapeutic intervention. There are very few dual TYK2/JAK1 inhibitors in clinical trials. So we have a nicely differentiated product. And there are no selective TYK2 inhibitors in clinical trials for cancer, which gives us a first-in-class opportunity for SDC-1802. So both of our molecules SDC-1801 and SDC-1802 potent and selective inhibitors with both TYK2 and JAK1. They have a favorable selectivity profile against JAK2 and JAK3 in contrast with some of the early first generation JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib and baricitinib. The molecules have the potential for once daily oral dosing in treatment. We should start it early on in the Phase Ia process for SDC-801. We'll get to see exactly how the pharmacokinetic profile of 1801 is looking, and that will inform us on the dosing schedule. And we also have a strong IP portfolio, protecting both candidates in all of the key territories and markets. So this slide gives a snapshot of our pipeline as it stands at the moment. You'll see our proprietary programs, SDC-801 and 1802. 1801 at the end of its preclinical phase. And hopefully, with a favorable response from NHRA, we'll be entering clinical Phase I before the end of this year. SDC-1802 is a little further behind, and we continue our translational studies. And then below, you'll see SRA737, now in the hands of GSK, but important to remember that it's completed 2 clinical Phase II studies in solid tumors as well as monotherapy and combination and showed a very good safety profile and some signs of efficacy, which we're hoping will encourage GSK to take this molecule further. In terms of our development time line internal focus, as mentioned, is on progressing STC 1801 into our first in human Phase I AP central trial, initial focus is on psoriasis. And the clinical studies will be conducted at a single specialist center in Manchester. We see in the time line, Q3 2022, we were able to file our CTA. And as Tim mentioned, we've completed the manufacture of the capsules for the clinical trial, and they're just going through their final QC process before they are released to the clinical unit. In Q4 2022, then the big objective is to initiate that Phase Ia clinical trial subject to approval from MHRA and the FX Committee. And then that trial is scheduled to go through 2023. We aim to complete the Phase Ia during 2023 and initiate the Phase Ib clinical trial in patients. And then we're hoping we'll have all of the data and the completion of that clinical trial, hopefully, early in 2024. That's very much subject to successful recruitment and progress on funding. Just briefly on SDC-1802 totaled in multiple cancers here. This demonstrated good efficacy in immunotherapy disease models against many cancers. The antitumor effects have been seen in models of, for example, kidney, colorectal, skin cancers and B cell lymphoma. We've got strong evidence at SDC-1802 acts through a novel immunotherapeutic mechanism. And again, we're dosing orally here, seeing positive results using SDC-1802 as a monotherapy and in combination with a number of chemotherapeutic agents. Our recent patent grants strengthened the IP portfolio in the major territories. And as we've mentioned, translational studies are ongoing and define the optimal transfer application. So there involve additional biomarker studies to better understand the mechanism of action, and that will help us to identify the ideal patient population for the Phase I study for the population with the best chance of responding by a molecule. And once we have this in place, we'll be completing our toxicology and manufacturing studies. And I think the experience we have in developing SDC-801 where we're greatly aid the development of 1802 have a very similar chemical structure, lot of the synthetic steps are identical. So we already have optimized process chemistry for those steps, I think we'll be able to move 1802 more rapidly through this toxicology and manufacturing studies in the future. And just a reminder of 737, where it stood before the GSK acquisition of Sierra, this is from 1 of the Sierra's presentations from March earlier this year. You can see lots of opportunities for SRA737, Sierra, we're talking about combinations with a BET inhibitor that in license called 505. Also opportunities for combinations with immuno-oncology agents and gemcitabine. So we're just waiting to hear what GSK will do about this. Obviously, as soon as we know something, we'll pass that on to our shareholders. But there's a 550,000 approximately -- $550,000 milestone payment to us upon the first patient dosed in the next clinical trial and still a total of nearly $80 million in total milestone payments. And additionally, there are royalties due if SRA737 gets on the market. So I'll hand back to Tim at this point to just conclude the presentation before we move on to the Q&A.
Tim Mitchell
executiveThank you, John. Yes. So to remind everyone of the potential value inflection points, and we can look forward to over the next 3 months through this year. So we talked about a midyear date for the CTA submission. And as you have noticed, we did that in -- at the end of July. We've selected the initial indication for Phase Ib clinical trial, that's psoriasis. So the next event we're looking for is the approval of the CTA by MHRA. So that's Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority. And I mean -- so that's slightly out of our control, but we are hoping that we'll have that in time for the start of the Phase Ia clinical trial by the end of this year. So we'll have the trial start to announce and then any updates on preclinical progress with SDC-1802. And then for JAK1, as John has alluded to then, we've seen that the acquisition offer has been approved by Sierra shareholders. We're now looking to see any news from SRA737. Obviously, we can't divulge anything that GSK hasn't put into the public domain. So we're waiting for public announcements on that. And then any milestone payments, should GSK choose to progress 737. We look forward to the milestone payments on the first patient state in any new clinical trials. So looking for plenty of important preclinical and clinical progress from the 3 programs here, so 1801, 1802 and 737. Okay. So that's the formal part of the presentation concluded. If I hand back to Mark from MEDiSTRAVA.
Mark Swallow
attendeeThat's great, Tim. Tim, John, Stephen, thank you very much indeed for updating investors this morning. [Operator Instructions]. So as the company takes a few moments to prepare for the questions submitted today, I'd like to remind you that a recording of this presentation along with a couple of slides and the published Q&A can be accessed via your Investor Meet company dashboard. Jessica, if I may just hand back to you, as you can see, you've received a number of questions ahead of today's event along with the numbers throughout today's meeting, if I may. Just hand back to you to read out the questions for the team to respond to, and then I'll pick up from you at the end.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks very much, Mark, and thanks, everyone, for joining for your interest today. So I'm going to read some of the questions which have been submitted and then I'll invite Tim and the team to respond. And just to say, well, try to ask as many questions as possible. But we'll appreciate there's a lot -- if we're not able to respond live, we'll do so after the meeting in written form so please bear with us on this. So question one. Question regarding SDC-1801 clinical trials, how long until the CTA is approved? And then beyond the approval, what's the lead times before the first patient is dosed. So Tim, if I could hand over to you on that, please.
Tim Mitchell
executiveYes. Thanks, Jessica. Yes, so I think we've covered some of this in today's presentation then. So we're -- so say the CTA approval, we can't really give a firm date on because it's dependent on the MHRA. But based on previous experience, particularly with the consulting company we're using. We're expecting to get that approval in time for a clinical trial starts. So we'll put -- we're putting everything in place to start recruiting patients pretty much as soon as we've got that approval. And we're hoping that, that will all be done by the end of the year. In terms of how long the trial will take, again, that's slightly dependent on how quickly the Manchester unit can recruit patients. But as John noted, the Phase Ia part we're hoping to conclude during next year.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks, Tim. Second question, excellent news on the CTA submission. For many years now, the company has been stating an objective to find licensing partners. Are you able to share the number of potential interested parties in the last 12 months who've shown an interest?
Tim Mitchell
executiveSo can't really talk speculate on the number of interesting parties we're talking to, but we talk to potential partners all the time as part of our normal course of business. So we have an ongoing dialogue that continues with a number of interested parties. And I think that's really all I can say about it for now.
Unknown Executive
executiveSo the next question is about consolidation. When previously asked on the reasoning behind consolidation, the response was that as a higher consolidation price there would be more likelihood of institutional interest. How has the strategy played out since consolidation?
Stephen Parker
executiveShall I pick that one up? This is Stephen. The answer quite simply is that you don't flick a switch on the markets and everything immediately runs as you would like them to. Over time, I'm quite convinced that the decision to consolidate the shares will prove to be the right one. But of course, you have to remember that we're not isolated. We're part of the sector and we're part of the market. And as everybody knows, the last 12 months in this market and in this sector has been pretty down bloody. The -- interestingly, we're actually running about halfway down the scale of performance in the sector at the moment. So whilst clearly, I'd like it to be better, I'm conscious that it certainly could be worse.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks, Stephen. The next is a question about 737 and we've had a number of questions on this topic, so I'll try and consolidate these as far as possible. And the question essentially is, has the Board requested any information from GSK on its intentions and obligations under the original Sierra agreement.
Stephen Parker
executiveI'll pick this one up again. The Sareum Holdings plc does not have an agreement either with Sierra or now with GSK. The agreements for licensing the drug was done through Cancer Research. And we have an agreement with Cancer Research, which gives us the 37.5% economics of the agreement. So we are simply not in a position to -- or we have no status to go to GSK and ask these questions. Those questions have to come from the licensing partner, which is cancer research. We are in active conversations with cancer research to make sure that those -- that is happening. But we are simply not in a position to pick up the phone or any other means to GSK and ask those questions.
Unknown Executive
executiveThank you. So the next question is about what activities are being carried out prior to any response on the CTA from MHRA. Possibly, Tim, question for you.
Tim Mitchell
executiveJohn, do you want to pick that up?
John Reader
executiveYes, Tim. Yes, I mean it's really a case of -- with respect to 1801, it's getting all of the final details in for the clinical plans with the unit in Manchester. So as part of the CTA application, we've drawn up the protocol that will be used in the clinical and very detailed document extends to over 100 pages. But once that's in place, you then have to break down every single activity within that clinical plan to make sure that the clinical unit know exactly what it is that we're asking them to do. So it's really -- that's the ongoing task there. We're going to make sure that all of our internal procedures are absolutely 100%. It's conceivable that MHRA will come and inspect us. And so obviously, we want to make sure that we're prepared for that event. And I think the other one is the -- finalizing the quality control checks on the capsules. That's ongoing ahead of schedule and looking good so far. But that needs to complete before the capitals are sent off of the clinical unit. So it's really -- and then 1802, we've talked about the ongoing translational study.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks, John. So we have a few questions about cash and cash runway. What runway is the current approximately $4 million provide? And how is this expected to be used over the next 2 years? Is the first question. So I might ask Tim to take that one now.
Tim Mitchell
executiveYes. Okay. Thanks, Jessica. Yes, so the main focus is still the clinical trials on SDC-1801. So as we said in the RNS, and as we've alluded to in today's presentation, then that we -- well, we're funded for the Phase Ia part, but we would require additional funding to complete the psoriasis Phase Ib trial. So yes -- so I think that's the answer there. And then I think there were some further questions about clinical development of 1802 and that would also take SDC-1802 to the clinic that would also require further funding.
Unknown Executive
executiveAnd I think there was a further question on the current estimate of the cost of Phase Ib as well, Tim.
Tim Mitchell
executiveYes, I think we will -- can we just make sure we got that 1 right and provide a written answer to that, if that's okay?
Unknown Executive
executiveOf course. So the next question after the results from the CTA have been received, what are the intentions in relation to progressing the COVID potential of 1801. And what would be -- what are the steps being to progress this?
Tim Mitchell
executiveOkay. So the Phase Ia part of the trial will provide safety and dosing information that will be applicable for any trial. So the first part in healthy volunteers will look out for any safety issues. And we'll get a feel for how often we have to dose for and what those levels can be maintained at the various dosing schedules that would try. So that would be -- that information can be applied to any trials in any disease where 1801 is taken as an oral capsule, so including COVID-19. But I think -- so the -- we know that TYK2/JAK1 inhibition has demonstrated very good benefits in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. So we think there's a strong rationale for the initial focus on psoriasis there. And then once we have that data, we'll consider any other diseases, which may or may not include COVID.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks, Tim. Next question is around impact of the current geopolitical and economic situation on Sareum.
John Reader
executiveI'll take this one. I suppose it's an operational one really isn't it? I mean nothing really -- we're just focused on our drug development. Most of our work with CROs, the clinical trial, as we said, will take place in the U.K. Much of our recent work on the drug substance and drug product has also been done in the U.K. So with shelter from currency issues, if any, yes, so nothing really that I can think of.
Unknown Executive
executiveThanks. There's another question about sale of shares by directors. And the question specifically is, does this activity not run contrary to the Board's expectations of Sareum and its potential. So possibly a question there for Stephen.
Stephen Parker
executiveYes. You're referring to a recent sale, which was carried out by Tim and by John, which was linked to options, which were running out of date. Now the previous year, both gentlemen had actually lost options because there wasn't an opportunity to trade them within an unlocked period. And so on this particular occasion, it was felt that it was fair to allow them to trade because otherwise, they would simply have lost these options they've been holding over the lifetime of them. We don't expect that to be a frequent occurrence. But on that instance, that was why the Board showed it was appropriate for that to do so.
Unknown Executive
executiveThank you, Stephen. Next question is, thank you to everyone involved with Sareum. At what stage in the development of 1801 and 1802 would be the preferred point to consider a license agreement?
Tim Mitchell
executiveOkay. So we've talked previously about our ongoing dialogue with interested partners. And we continue to assess the potential value of an earlier stage transaction versus the risk and the time and the funding required for a later stage deal. So it's -- all the time, it's a balance of the further down the development track you go, the higher the value of the potential deal is and also there's more companies out there looking for later-stage deals generally even early-stage deals. So it's really a judgment call by the Board on how far we think we want to take the programs before we do license them on. But I think there's pretty much a hard stop that we'd never take a program into the market. So at some stage during the late -- at the latest, the sort of mid- to late-clinical stage, we would be looking to license these on. But if the right deal comes along at an earlier stage, then of course, we'll take it.
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. Thank you. The next question is about FLT3 will there be any attempt to fix solubility issues on FLT3?
Tim Mitchell
executiveShall I take it, John? Or do you want to chip in?
Stephen Parker
executiveGo ahead, and I'll add anything if required.
Tim Mitchell
executiveOkay. Great. So our current priorities are SDC-1801 and 1802. That's the 2 TYK2/JAK1 programs. So we've had several attempts to find ways of progressing FLT3+Aurora with various partners, particularly in China. So I think where we are at the moment is that it's -- the program is deprioritized if we will become aware of any new methodologies that would address the formulation issues that we have with FLT3, then we would. We've continued the program based on that. But I think at the moment, we're just waiting to see waiting to find a way to address these formulation issues before we progress any further.
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. Next question, now that 1801 is heading to the clinic, what's the time frame for 1802 to do the same?
Tim Mitchell
executiveSo I think it's really too early to give a definite frame for -- or time frame for 1802 to commence its clinical studies. We really need to complete the translational studies to determine these cancer indications for the molecule. And then we can plan to complete the studies -- the clinical -- the preclinical studies to get it into the clinic. I think as John noted in the presentation, 1802 is similar in structural, the molecular structure to 1801. So the experience that we gained from the preclinical studies on 1801 should be very much transferable and we'll facilitate the preclinical work on 1802.
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. And then a further question on 1802, will it be administered in the same capsule form as 1801?
Tim Mitchell
executiveSo I think we just both capsule and on bottle. And again, we can use the experience from our preclinical formulation studies on 1801 to guide us on this. As we said, these molecules are quite similar. So John, were you...
John Reader
executiveI mean I think the only other thing is we may have some of the clinical data on the capsule formulation of 1801 by the time we get to the stage of 1802, which obviously will when we used to guide our selection. I think [indiscernible] be preferrable. So that's where my preference at the moment, but we'll assess it once we have all of the data on 1802 and go for most appropriate formulation.
Unknown Executive
executiveNext question is about patents. And do you have plans to extend the life of older patents?
Tim Mitchell
executiveJohn, do you want to take that?
John Reader
executiveYes. I will -- I mean we have a strategy in place that maximizes the lifetime of all of our patents as well as we can. So I think just on the older patterns a lot of them, some of them have served their purpose very well, so which was to carve out an area of chemical space in which we can operate. And the strategy then was to file selection patents on the actual molecules of interest. And that's what we've done. So we've got, I think, good lifetime remaining on our patents for 1801 and 1802. And obviously, there are little tricks to extend the lifetime as much as possible. I mean an example of that would be the crystallization of the solid format that you've seen for 1801 or you may have seen it. It's a pattern that seeks to protect particular crystal forms of SDC-1801 it starts from patenting again when we file that application. So yes, we have a strategy in place to extend the lifetime of patterns as far as possible.
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. Next question is about whether there are plans when we want to attend the JAK inhibitors Development Summit in Boston? If you already, apologies if the question was if you have attended.
John Reader
executiveRight. Yes. Well, yes, except that it became an online event, but I was. This is John speaking. I was at the event online. Some very interesting discussions about future therapeutic areas, the JAK inhibitors discussion on decisions, but the people who actually prescribe the means concerning the black box warnings around some of the earlier JAK inhibitors, which is very interesting. Yes, that was interesting...
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. Thank you. I think that we have a few additional questions coming in on the chart. One was related to plans to carry out research on new molecules on the SKIL platform. And the question is how many roughly are you looking at?
Tim Mitchell
executiveYes. So I'll pick it up. It's Tim. So as we said, it's 1801 is our top priority, followed by 1802. So we're doing -- we're really concentrating on the progression of those molecules. But if the funding were available or we had some particular ideas about how to get new molecules coming out of the skill platform, but then we would pick that up. And at the moment, it's 1801 and 1802 are top priorities.
Unknown Executive
executiveGreat. Then as an additional question on the JAK. What are John's thoughts on the allosteric mechanism of inhibition versus 1801.
John Reader
executiveWell, it's interesting. I mean, the deucravacitinib molecule from BMS looks to be working well in the clinics, getting good safety data. It's obviously a very selective method for inhibiting TYK2 only. I think we're hoping there will be an advantage with our molecule is that we get the JAK1 inhibition as well alongside TYK2. And, as I mentioned in my presentation, we think that could be very important in, for example, the interferon alpha signaling pathway, which relies on both TYK2 and JAK1 to inhibit that signaled fully. And there are other opportunities where JAK1 plays a very important role in many inflammatory cytokines. So I think -- I would say it's a nice approach for Pure TYK2. And there are several other companies going down that route of Nimbus [indiscernible]. It's hard to know how they are going to differentiate their molecules from deucravacitinib but anyway that's their problem. But I think we're nicely differentiated with the additional JAK1 activity, which we believe will give us some tough the potential to give us some efficacy advantages.
Unknown Executive
executiveI think that's the bulk of the questions asked already. So it might be a good time to hand back to Tim to wrap up now.
Tim Mitchell
executiveYes. Thanks very much. Yes. So I think some of the questions posted live, I think we've covered off in the pre-submitted ones. There's others there that I think we need a more considered written answer to which we will provide that during the next week or so. So really, it reminds me to thank everybody for attending today. Thank you for your questions, and we've certainly got a lot to look forward to here at Sareum as we work through the CTA approval of SDC-1801 and start its clinical journey. So again, thank you very much for joining us.
Mark Swallow
attendeeThat's great. Tim, John, Steve and Jessica. Thank you ever so much for your time this morning and for updating investors. Please ask investors not to close this session as you'll now be automatically redirected for the opportunity to provide your feedback in order the management team can better understand your views and expectations. This is going to take a few moments to complete, but I'm sure it'll be greatly valued by the company. On behalf of the management team of Sareum Holdings Plc, would like to thank you for attending today's presentation. That now concludes today's session. I wish you all a very pleasant morning.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sareum Holdings plc transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Sareum Holdings plc earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.