Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 17, 2021

NASDAQ US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 40 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#1

Hi. Good morning, everyone. This is Jon Raviv. I'm Citi's U.S. Aerospace & Defense analyst. Thank you very much for joining us for our Global Virtual Industrials Conference. Obviously, sucks not to be in Miami, but I do have a nifty space background behind me, so that's worth something, right? Anyway, we're going to get started here. We're going to have a conversation with SAIC. We're very pleased to be joined by CEO, Nazzic Keene. And also CFO, relatively new CFO, Prabu Natarajan, who are joining us for the next 40 minutes. We'll have a bit of a conversation, Q&A format. There should be a question window in the venue you're viewing in right now, and those questions will get to me, and I can include those as well. But in the meantime, I'll quickly turn it over to Shane Canestra, who heads up the IR effort over at SAIC with a quick disclaimer.

Shane Canestra

executive
#2

Thank you very much, Jon. SAIC is very pleased to participate once again in Citi's Virtual Industrials Conference. Appreciate the opportunity to speak. As Jon mentioned, we have Nazzic Keene, our CEO; and Prabu Natarajan, our CFO -- our new CFO, are present with us today. I will just mention that we are in the process of closing out the fourth quarter of our FY '21, which ended January 29, and we were reporting those results and issuing our forward outlook. We anticipate at the end of March 25 in the evening, to be specific, so an item for your calendar there. But -- so again, thank you for having us, and I'll turn it back over to Jon to talk with our execs.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#3

Sure. Thank you very much, Shane. So I look forward to that March 25 report. In the meantime, I'm sure there's a lot to talk about right here. So we'll get started. So first, Nazzic, I mean, you -- we used to be able to call you the new CEO, but you're not so much the new CEO anymore because now you have a new CFO.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#4

But -- so a 2-parter here. Nazzic, talk about some of the changes that you have made over the years that you've been CEO, and then we'll shift, and I'll pivot into Prabu, and to sort of hear from you, what do you bring to this job for your past experiences in the defense industry. So a little one-two punch here from Nazzic, then Prabu.

Nazzic Keene

executive
#5

Okay. Great. Thanks, Jon. And I too wish I was in Miami. It would be great to see you in person. But hopefully, we can plan on that for this time next year. I look forward to that. So yes, I think it feels like just yesterday, I was CEO, but then it feels like I've been in the seat for a long time with this past year we've had. But very pleased with the progress we've made. I'll touch on a couple of key things that we've done, but I do want to give Prabu a chance to want to introduce himself a little bit, but also talk a little bit about why he joined SAIC and what he's saying. So as you're aware, when I stepped into the seat, one of the first things that I did was to take a fresh look at our strategy and to ensure that we're focused on the right things that we're going to drive profitable organic, sustained growth over the course of the next many years. And so we made a few choices. One was to exit the platform integration business in the way that we were executing that business. We still do some interesting engineering-type work in support of those missions, but less on the manufacturing side, and redirect some of those investments in dollars. We also took the opportunity then to look at the broad leadership team and make sure that we have the people focused to the right areas. And we made a couple of key hires, a couple of key additions. So we brought on Dee Dee Helfenstein, midyear last year. She also assimilated during a pandemic, which seems to be the new way that execs simulate, probably is doing the same. And she joined us to help drive our organic strategy, to help drive our solution differentiation and to really help us focus on profitable organic growth. So very pleased with the work that she's been able to do. And she's been leading our continuous, which it is. It's an agile continuous strategy refresh to ensure that we're focused on the right things. And then, of course, with the announcement of Charlie's retirement late last year, we had the opportunity to look in the industry and bring on -- and we looked at a lot of really, really fabulous CFO candidates. But really pleased that Prabu elected to join us. And I'll touch on a little bit of our rationale for Prabu. But we were looking for a CFO that not only could do what needs to get done internally, running the organization. We have a very, very solid and strong financial organization. But I was looking for a true strategic partner, and somebody who could help me, help the leadership team drive the strategy of the company, driving profitable organic growth and bring that strategic lens to how we operate. And so very pleased that with Prabu's background, across multiple disciplines, across multiple areas of business in our industry, really brought that strategic focus and lens. So I'm going let Prabu provide a little bit of color as well.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#6

Thanks a lot for that needless introduction, Nazzic, and excited to be here this morning, Jon, and too bad we could not do this in person. First of all, I have to say, I'm just incredibly honored to have joined SAIC. After some careful consideration, it was clear to me that SAIC provided an opportunity to join a best-in-class government services company, a true technology company and a top-notch management team. I was attracted to the company because of just the heritage and the legacy of strong program performance. And where I grew up, this was important. We always look for that culture of excellence and execution. That was important to me. To me, it was just as important to have a real strategy and a pipeline that's aligned with the strategy and the opportunity to be a true strategic partner to the management team. And so to me, I think that's what got me to SAIC. Obviously, my experience at my prior roles, including having been a financial leader in a large IT segment of another prime, obviously gives me the ability to understand and get up to speed a little bit quickly on the portfolio. But candidly, lots of priorities. I think it's really important to be selective, take a long-term perspective on the priorities and ensure that we have a plan to execute. I'd say, obviously, we're going to talk a lot about all of our financial metrics. And we're going to continue to make improvements across the financial metrics. It is really important to balance, I think, growth, profitability and cash flow. And always be tuned into a conversation of our shareholder value. To me, I think, I expect to bring a little more to the conversation here. And truly engaging with the team, with our growth officer and the rest of the management team on the long-term strategy, taking a long-term view of the business as part of that team to help guide this company through the next set of decisions over the next several years. So truly an exciting time at SAIC, and I'm truly honored, as I said, to be part of the team to help contribute here.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#7

Okay. One -- no, it's good. It's a great kickoff here. So Nazzic, the changes you've made and the talent you brought in, you keep talking about sustainable differentiated, but really profitable organic growth. So let's talk about the growth side for a little bit because that's been on folks' minds for -- a little bit on SAIC. So could you touch upon perhaps what accounts for some of that organic growth having fallen, if I may say, short for a few quarters or even year or a couple of years here and there versus peers? They are doing mid single-digit to high single-digit. You've been a little bit lower. I suspect some of that is the exit from platform integration. But we've seen that gap close. So what's closing that gap right now and going forward? And maybe touch on a little bit of the COVID impact that's hit your '20 year, fiscal '21 and maybe '22?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#8

Absolutely. So I'll address the first part a little bit, and you captured some of that as well, and I'm going to let Prabu give some specifics on the impact of COVID. So as I mentioned, when I became CEO 1.5 years or so ago, we did take a fresh look at strategy because, to your point, we were not seeing the profitable organic growth that the industry was seeing. And so it was incumbent on us to take a look to understand why and more importantly understand what we could do to change that trajectory. And so we did that. We did make some pivots. As I mentioned, the -- we were making pretty significant investments in the platform business. We believe -- and I was part of that team as well, we believe that, that would be a catalyst for growth for us, didn't end up turning out that way. It was a big bet and they don't always pay off. But we did have the opportunity then to re-pivot those dollars and reinvest some of those monies into our now-strategy and our go-forward strategy. And as said, we all know, in this industry, it takes some time. It takes 12, 18, sometimes 24 months to see the fruits of those decisions and to see the success. Now the good news is we have seen some of that. We have seen -- certainly, this last few quarters, we've seen the -- what's a good leading indicator in being able to drive a strong book-to-bill, to retire much of the recompete risk that exists in the portfolio and even to be able to add and build on some new programs. So we are seeing some of that. And that really -- that's -- that early success is really driven by the organic strategy refresh, the focus in investing in those areas organically that we believe are going to drive our success, as well as the successful integration of both the Engility and the Unisys Federal acquisition. So I feel very good about. So I'm not going to promise long-term growth rates today. We are going to provide some guidance in March. But I will say that we are seeing the early signs of our decisions. We are seeing early success. And I feel optimistic going into this next year and the years to come because Prabu will continuously remind me and remind the team this is a long-term journey. Now with that being said, I'll let Prabu provide a little bit of a color on COVID. But had it not been for COVID this year, and I haven't seen -- I wish we could say would have, could have, or should have, we would have had a very -- a much more compelling growth year than we've seen in our history over the last few years. And so -- but we all have to navigate this together. And it is what it is. And Prabu will provide a little color on that.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#9

Thanks, Nazzic. As you know, Jon, our fiscal year-end ended at the end of January. So we are currently in the process of closing our books. Certainly, we'll talk about how Q4 ended, but also about FY '22 on our guidance called in March. Now through the third quarter of FY '21, COVID impacted the business by about $170 million, let's say, around -- on the revenue side, and about $25 million of EBITDA. And the quarterly pace of the COVID impact has been relatively stable. So let's call it 60 to 80 a quarter. And we probably won't see a material change to that in the fourth quarter. But obviously, we'll know more in a few weeks. We previously communicated that the anticipated full year impact was about $250 million for FY '21 and about $35 million of EBITDA, which equates to, let's call it, 3% to 4% of organic growth. So to me, I think, as Nazzic reminded us, COVID's still here with us. Query, how long? It continues over the course of the year and candidly what buying patterns look like in the second quarter to second half of FY '22, and we'll have to be thoughtful about how we think through the pieces. And obviously, we'll be very clear about what the assumptions are as we provide guidance at the end of March. But I'd say we probably want to hold our horses for another month, and we'll be out there with some real numbers.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#10

That sounds about right, Prabu. If I might just on the COVID-19 and just thinking about it, what is the difference between how you're operating now and how are you operating? And I guess that will be your first fiscal quarter or second fiscal quarter of '21. So I'm just thinking about how has the customer been able to get you more on-site now versus 10 months ago, for example because you mentioned that, that impact has been relatively steady in the entire period. So I'm just trying to understand where is there room for improvement? And is there -- can there be some kind of, I don't want to call it a snapback, but a reengagement with things that you're just not able to do?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#11

So let me touch on -- I think I understand the question. If I miss it, please correct me. But right now, we had -- we had seen as -- I'm going to -- in the fall of last year, I don't remember exactly when it was, we've seen some early indications that in some of the national intelligence community that some folks were able to come back to work and so we were cautiously optimistic. Unfortunately, then we also saw a spike across the nation in COVID cases. And so some of that slowed down and reversed itself. So I think as we go into where we sit today with still the -- we had the height of COVID cases over the holidays. We're seeing a little bit of softening, so we might see some bounce back. But we tend to see the same behavior. It really -- I believe until vaccines are widespread, that we're not going to see significant change in our ability to do -- to really move the needle on COVID. There might be some cases where one customer brings some folks back or one stays on what's called the blue and gold schedule. But if you think about our 3 significant pockets, it -- one is in the supply chain, which is just the ability for -- to support the troops and troop movement and certainly, COVID has hampered some of that. The other is the FAA, where it's a bit dependent on air traffic and being able to train air traffic controllers and air traffic volume, and that tends to still be lagging. And then, of course, the intelligence community. So we may see a little bit of pickup, but I truly believe that until the vaccines are widespread, we're not going to see what I would consider a return to whatever normal is. Prabu, I don't know if you can certainly add some color there.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#12

Those are the right drivers, Nazzic. I just say there are parts of the business where it really is tied to OPTEMPO. When we see OPTEMPO returning to normal, I'd say we probably start to see volumes return to normal. I don't know that we are expecting that volumes will bounce back sort of a V-shape recovery, if you will, because I don't reasonably think that's going to happen in this case. And some of that volume may just, in fact, be lost volume from FY '21. But we are on a path, as we think about it, to ensure that when we get to a place where COVID is out there and sort of the inoculations of the vaccines are out there, it puts us in a place where we can more predictably talk about the cadence of the business.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#13

Understood. And just to be -- and just to put a fine point on it, OPTEMPO is not number of people deployed in Afghanistan, for example. It's literally how much the military is moving around the world and because of COVID, there are still large number of restrictions on that ability just to move in the normal course of data. The same way that I'm sitting here at home, I don't know where you are, but considering we are not landing, also military is not traveling nearly as much as it needs.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#14

That's right. Exactly.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#15

Okay. So we'll see how that pans out over FY '22, but clearly a lot of businesses still seeing COVID impacts continuing in 2021 and year FY '22.

Nazzic Keene

executive
#16

And Jon, I will say that on that topic, we will provide some color in the March time frame. We're going through our annual cycle of planning. And obviously, we'll provide some of that conversation in March. And one of the things that we're trying to do as best we can, as clear as a crystal ball can possibly be, is make some assumptions on how long we think it will take us to get back to that, and we'll share some of those assumptions with you.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#17

Looking forward to it, for sure. Bigger picture, in this environment, how should we think about how you're aligned to customer priorities? A little bit about what those priorities are, how they've been impacted by COVID? And then also by -- quite frankly, the sunburst attacks or whatever you want to call them, but a very significant cyber intrusion over the past year, quite frankly.

Nazzic Keene

executive
#18

Great. So the demand for what we do is still robust. We have -- any given day, we have more opportunities than resources to pursue. And we believe we're very well aligned to the areas of national importance where we have the capabilities. And so I feel very good about our position in the market. We're focused on a handful of strategic areas. We've touched on these before. IT modernization, which was the catalyst for the recent acquisition of Unisys Federal to strengthen and accelerate our focus there. The space market and again, these are areas that we believe will get increased investments across our customer base and will drive our sustained profitable growth. And there are large addressable markets that afford us the opportunity. So regardless of what happens with budgets and everybody is speculating on what the budgets may be -- may look like a year from now, 2 years from now, what pockets may get some pressure, what pockets may get some lift. We believe we're exceptionally well positioned. And again, I'll just reinforce the fact that we do have a diversified portfolio, not just in who we serve, but in what we do. So we believe that we're well positioned and can pivot if needed, based on government priorities. Now the pandemic has absolutely forced us to think a bit differently. The -- I think it's the combination of a pandemic as well as, as you touched on, the cyber -- some of the cyber risks that presented themselves over the course of the last many months that if nothing else heightened the awareness for how important it is to have modernized infrastructure and modernized IT systems. And so again, that's an area where we can bring value, we can bridge solutions. And our customers are -- have a heightened awareness and heightened demand for how to think about that going forward. For our business itself, we have not seen an impact -- any kind of significant impact from the cyber attacks. We've obviously done a lot of -- as any company in this space, a lot of looking and ensuring that we're well protected. And we've also supported our customers in doing that as well. Now -- but I will say, I think it's still unfolding as well. I think there's still more to learn, and there's still more to understand from exactly what happened. But it is an area that is getting a tremendous amount of focus for all the right reasons internally, but obviously very concerning as we think about the -- what's happening in the cyber world. So I firmly believe that we're well positioned that these are areas of good focus, they are bipartisan, and I believe they'll continue to get focus from this administration as well.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#19

Nazzic, you -- I think you recently announced some tweaks to your matrix structure. It's a matrix structure, which I think have been put -- those put in place in the company. You've been involved in it for a long time, has put in place in the company, I think, even when at the time of the splits or going on almost 8 years at this point or just over 7, not to date ourselves at all. But how do those tweaks to the -- or how those ongoing tweaks that matrix structure secure or I should say, put you in that position for those future requirements as they come up or put you in a position to dodge and weave to wherever those things might go?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#20

No. It's -- you're right. We did formalize and put together a matrix operating model when we spun from our former parent. Because we believe that, that was the best use of the organizational structure to support our strategy. And so we continue to believe that, and it has served us exceptionally well. We did make some tweaks after we did our strategy refresh, after we took a hard look at where we have strength in the organization, where we had the opportunity to strengthen the organization, we did want to make sure that we stay nimble and we stay agile in how we organize and support our objectives. So what we did is we brought in, as I mentioned earlier, Dee Dee Helfenstein to formally stand up a -- or to build on what was already a horizontal organization, but to build on an organization to strengthen our capabilities, strengthen our focus on organic growth and our capabilities that we can leverage across the portfolio. And so Dee Dee is focused on that. And I just am very optimistic, again, that model has served us well and will continue to serve us well. And we're really focused in that organization in areas that I touched on, digital transformation, IT modernization, digital engineering, artificial intelligence and those assets, solutions and technologies that span the customer-facing organization. And then we have 2 sectors, the national security and space sector and the defense and civilian sector. And we put those together very purposefully to leverage strengths and capabilities that existed inside of the organization to be able to leverage across a broader portfolio. So as an example, we had space previously between 2 different customer-facing organizations, the space-related missions. And bringing those together, we believe, will afford us the opportunity to really focus, strengthen our position and drive growth in that market. And then bringing together defense and civilian, we had a defense portfolio that was very strong in engineering, mission-related engineering work. We had a civilian portfolio that was very strong in digital transformation and IT modernization. And by bringing those together, we believe that we can capitalize on the strengths of both teams and be able to drive growth. So we feel very good about where we are organizationally, the organization is aligned to our strategy, and we believe we're very well positioned.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#21

Interesting. That's excellent color. I think a big piece of that -- well, you tell me. But it seems like a big piece of that, especially on the civilian, on the digital transformation side is, of course, Unisys. So how -- where does Unisys fit in? We're a year into the acquisition, you all have talked about double-digit growth in that asset. Is that playing out roughly as expected? And also, how is the company built to run what, at least, I perceive to be a -- I mean, what we've said is, but a majority fixed-price business, which is not -- SAIC is not a majority fixed-price business, for example. So have you brought them in, and almost changed the way you do business to fit them or changed the way they do a little bit to fit you?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#22

Perfect. So I'm going to answer a couple of those and let Prabu weigh in as well because he's helping us take a good look at our portfolio and our mix. So yes, you're right, it's been almost a year since we closed that acquisition. We closed that acquisition on the first day and sent everybody home for the pandemic. So it's been quite a year, and the team has just done an excellent job of integrating and becoming part of SAIC over the course of this last year. I'm incredibly pleased with the performance. It is -- it really has been a catalyst and an accelerator for our position in so many areas that I touched on. The growth profile, the financial profile that we assumed is playing out. And we knew there was going to be a bit of a V because of a loss of the contract, but everything has played out as we expected. And the profitability continues to be strong as well. So the integration has gone well. It is -- we kept it for the most part in the early days together as a team, for lack of a better word. But as I touched on this recent reorganization, then we better aligned some of the portfolio with the accounts that they serve. So very pleased with how the team is integrated in this very interesting way of integration, of doing everything of resume as we're doing today, and very pleased with that acquisition. Prabu, I'm going to let you provide a little bit of color on the portfolio side.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#23

Thanks, Nazzic. Maybe I'll take a little bit of time to talk about how we're thinking about managing the cost-plus business predominantly and getting some more fixed price into the mix. So prior to the Unisys Federal acquisition, the SAIC portfolio consisted of about 25% cost of fixed price work. And we wanted to increase that percentage. And there are typically 2 ways to do that, sort of organically build a pipeline, be thoughtful about executing to that pipeline and building fixed-price content within the pipeline. And then occasionally, an opportunity presents itself where you could do this inorganically. And so for us, Unisys Federal was a way to thoughtfully increase our fixed-price content. So we know where the risks are, and we know how to mitigate the risks that we go through execution. SAIC has always had a proud legacy of systems engineering. And that really fundamentally means understanding what the risks and opportunities are, understanding that you have to derisk the portfolio as you go through execution, and harvest the opportunities that present themselves and us ultimately getting the balance in a fixed-price business as it is really helpful. The other comment that Nazzic made was also incredibly important. We kept the Unisys Federal team primarily as a single operating team for a period of time. And I think as some of these acquisitions go, it's really important to bring some of that culture into the legacy SAIC culture and get some of their legacy SAIC culture into Unisys Federal culture and the changes we made to the operating structure allows us to bring, I think, balance to the conversation. This isn't just growth for growth's sake. This isn't about risk management just because we feel comfortable managing all the risks we have that we know how to anticipate it. But really getting balance in the conversation so we can stretch where we need to stretch and pull back where we need to pull back, and getting the balance right over time with a portfolio, that is now at the combined level, approaching, I'd say, a 50-50 mix between cost-plus and fixed price. But I think the last year has shown us that we can comfortably take on fixed-price work and execute to what we're committed to executing. But I think as with all things in life, balance is important, and I think we're finding that balance here between cost-plus and fixed price.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#24

And that tees up the next line of questioning, if you will, pretty nicely I think when it comes to margins and margin drivers. But we'll start here just in terms of drivers. I mean, it seems to me like this business -- this industry, I should say, is really driven by mix, contract style, how you deliver, how the customer is willing to accept. And it feels like a lot of that fixed price push is sometimes has to be a pull. The customer doesn't want to go fixed price, then you're not going to do fixed prices, and you'll do cost-plus. But then you add on Engility, you add on Unisys, and that changes the game a little bit here, I suppose. So what is the -- so I'll start here, what are -- where are we leveling up to right now in terms of margins when you think about the acquisitions, the cost synergies and also this underlying improvement? And then maybe touch a little bit upon why we're stepping down again in 4Q and how all that's been impacted by COVID as well from a margin perspective?

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#25

I'll take that one on, and Nazzic can add color here as we go. So I'd say, in margin rates, long-term view is important. And I -- we can never get tired of reminding folks that this used to be a 6%, 6.5% business. It's comfortably 8.5% to 9% now. So it is a journey over several years. And as we look forward to the next 3 to 5 years, I'd say the opportunity will come from continuing to shape the portfolio so we have a little more fixed-price content and that we continue to execute in the way that we've executed in the past. And I think knowing what not to do is just as important as knowing what to do. And I'd say in the near term, I'd say the margin accretion, if you will, comes from ensuring that we're executing well. So it's organically, what does the portfolio generate and can we offset the risks early in the year and harvest the opportunity? It's sort of basic one-on-one program management in the near term. But over the long term, really ensuring that we change the mix and the underlying opportunity set in the company. So I think on the cost-plus front, I think as you know pretty well, Jon, since we're predominantly cost-plus, cost reductions don't necessarily yield themselves to the bottom line EBITDA margin, and therefore, we tend to give this up over time. So to me, I think it's really important to take a long-term view of the portfolio and ensure that we're primed for accretion. But it takes time to make that change, and it's a real journey. And so to me, I think it's just important to be thoughtful about the pipeline we're building and make sure that we're consistently building a portfolio for the future. Nazzic, do you want to add something?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#26

No. I think you did a great job, Prabu. I'm not sure I have much to add. I guess I'll voice that last point, and that is that as we look at our strategy, and we continue to choose and focus on how we're going to build our strategy, what customers we're going to serve, what type of work we are going to do, that lens of margin is part of that. So we don't aspire to grow at all cost. We aspire to grow our top line responsibly with our bottom line. And so that mix, the financial attributes of our portfolio form our strategy as well.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#27

Indeed. And we got a little bit into it there with margin potential over the long term. What I -- I mean, SAIC used to be doing, as you said, 6% to 6.5% at a time when some peers, if you will, in the industry, were doing maybe in 8% to 9%. Now you all are comfortably in the 8.5% to 9% range. And peers, if you will, are doing 10-plus. I know there's some elements in your portfolio that is always going to structurally weigh you down, not a bad thing if it's a high cash contributor. But bigger picture, what are some of the structural reasons that you would be behind? And is there a view as everyone else seems to zoom up beyond 10, 11, 12? Can I see SAIC a double-digit EBITDA margin business over time -- over the long term, if you effect that -- some of that transformation you talked about?

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#28

Okay. I think it's going to come down to 2 critical drivers. I think, one, the quality of the pipeline and ensuring that we continue to take on work that is accretive to the existing set of programs we have. So we do -- that's the long-term opportunity. Occasionally, we'll have inorganic opportunities, but that's fundamentally not the core strategy. The core strategy is to figure out what the pipeline needs to look like and then execute through that pipeline. There are parts of the portfolio where our margins are inherently lower than, I would say, the rest of the company. And we're just having thoughtful conversations about the role those parts of the portfolio play within the overall margin profile of the company. And I mentioned this last week at another event that we do see some unnatural behaviors at times and it's important to think about margin as a long-term journey and having the metrics in place that incentivize the team to move towards the long-term objective here. So in -- as a hypothetical, I would say, we always want to do better than where we are. And that's the journey we're on. And -- but there are parts of the business where the organic growth rates are lower or there may be saturation in the customer base and where it's inherently harder to drive additional margin rate potential. Those are thoughtful conversations we're going to have and make sure that we think about the value of those pieces of the portfolio in the portfolio of the company and in the larger pipeline discussions we have. So we're thoughtfully investing scarce investment dollars to grow the parts of the business that are most aligned to where the customers' missions are going to be in the next 3 to 5 years.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#29

Right. In our last 7 minutes, we'll talk about cash flow, which is a relatively important part of this business as well, of course. So what are some of the moving pieces to achieving the target that your predecessor, Prabu, laid out. It's really been really $500 million average free cash flow across FY '21, '22. Charlie did seem to make that a real big. That is an important target for you all. And how should we think about that from the aspect of a long-term sustainable level?

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#30

Yes. Thanks for the question. So I would say on cash, obviously, as we've disclosed over the course of '21, payroll tax deferral obviously added an element of tailwind to us in a number of companies, and we disclosed that it's about $90 million to $100 million in FY '21. Obviously, we're give -- we're going to give some of that back in FY '22 and FY '23. So therefore, there will be some impact to ongoing sort of free cash flow, if you will, from the give back of the payroll deferrals. And we'll incorporate this dynamic into our outlook when we provide guidance in March. There was also an element of profit impact from COVID. And obviously, there's going to be some lingering impacts, depending on how long COVID runs into FY '22, I would say. This company has done a really nice job over the years on cash generation. I truly believe we are one of the better companies out there to think about turning adjusted EBITDA and operating cash, net income into free cash flow. And we have conversion metrics that are important to us. DSO metrics that are important to us. So we are going to continue to get better on cash, I think on a long-term basis, absent the puts and takes that we always invariably have in a company. Some of this is going to depend on revenue growth. Some of this is going to depend on EBITDA that we can deliver from the revenue, I'd say long-term, sustainable level continues to be in that $500 million area as, again, as I said, importantly, as long as the business continues to grow and generate the EBITDA that is capable of generating. So I'd say still pretty much in line with some of the feedback that Charlie had for some of you all, so I'd say we're right on track there.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#31

Okay. And then with all that cash coming through, some discussion around capital allocation, I think, is warrant to hear. How are you thinking about future capital allocation plans granted once you're almost finished with your post-Unisys process taking into account where your leverage is? And then also, you did mention some ideas or some thoughtful conversations you all are having around portfolio and whether that could include maybe adding something or perhaps even subtracting something? And if you were to subtract something, will the capital allocation priority be for that subtraction, if you will?

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#32

Always on capital allocation, I think you have to have balance in the conversation. We pay a dividend today and we're committed to the dividend. Obviously, we'll revisit it because we wanted to be at a level consistent with where our peers are. We are committed to delevering some after the acquisitions, and we're going to go execute and ensure that we get there. Having said that, and I've said this in other forums, interest rates are incredibly cheap. It is important to maintain flexibility in the balance sheet to ensure that we're thoughtfully allocating capital. And I think the crispest way to say this is to allocate capital to the highest risk-adjusted returns, and return that to the shareholders. And I think part of the conversation we're having is have some balance sheet flexibility, have the tools in your toolkit that you can deploy depending on the circumstance. We have no interest in forwarding cash on the balance sheet. We have no interest in delevering beyond a certain point. And as I said, we're committed to the dividend and want to make sure that it's in line with where our peers are, and to maintain some competitiveness there. So therefore, capital allocation truly becomes a flexible way to think about where do we return capital in ways that are most accretive to our shareholders. And which tool we use really depends on what is the best risk-adjusted return for our shareholders. And the conversations we're having right now. And obviously, M&A and to the extent we have organic changes to the portfolio, and that allows us to generate additional liquidity. We're going to have a similar balanced conversation about what to do with use of proceeds from those dispositions.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#33

And then in the last 2 minutes here, a little bit on competitive dynamics, perhaps Nazzic, I'd be curious, your updated thoughts. I'd probably buggy on this every once in a while. Updated thoughts on how you assess the current competitive landscape in terms of number? And also in terms of type of companies competing? And then when you look at the opportunity for large scale IT modernization opportunities or large scale IT implementations. How do you compete on those versus others, some big tech names and newer smaller names or some of your existing work, I may call them traditional competitor set?

Nazzic Keene

executive
#34

So there's clearly no shortage of competition in this industry that keeps morphing, right. It keeps morphing and changing. A lot of activity taking place on the M&A side is changing the landscape a bit. And so we keep -- we stay aware of that, we stay cognizant of it. We look at most of the assets that are in some form of fashion, changing home rooms. And so I think the competitive landscape is real. It's strong, but I'm very proud and pleased that we remain one of the top-tier providers in this market, and that's absolutely our intent. I touched on before on the M&A side. We don't feel the need or compelled to do an acquisition to drive scale or size. We are absolutely of sufficient scale and size to compete for any of the opportunities that we aspire to consistent with our strategy. And the elements that need to go into those large-scale acquisitions are strong and sizable past performance, the competencies, the skills, the technologies to be able to serve and deliver. And we've demonstrated certainly all of those over the course of the last few years as a result of our organic as well as our inorganic strategy to strengthen and solidify our company. So I feel very good about where we are. I feel very good about our competitive position. It remains -- competition is formidable. There's no question about that. But that brings out the best in all of us. And I think that's ultimately good for the customer and continues to allow us to raise our game as well. So I feel very confident about our position in the market.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#35

Absolutely. Thank you for that, Nazzic, Prabu. Thank you also for your time, and also Shane. We're at the top of the hour here. So I want to thank you for joining us, although I know it doesn't take much to flip on your computer. But nevertheless, all time is spent on screen these days, it is nevertheless an effort. So thank you very much, again. As everyone says, hope to see in person soon. God willing.

Nazzic Keene

executive
#36

Happy to be here.

Jonathan Raviv

analyst
#37

And we'll now -- we'll close it out.

Shane Canestra

executive
#38

Thanks a lot, Jon.

Prabu Natarajan

executive
#39

Thanks a lot.

Shane Canestra

executive
#40

Thank you, Jon.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Science Applications International Corporation transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Science Applications International Corporation earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.