Sotera Health Company (SHC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 5, 2026

NASDAQ US Health Care Life Sciences Tools and Services earnings 35 min

What were the key takeaways from Sotera Health Company's May 5, 2026 earnings call?

Sotera Health Company reported a strong start to fiscal year 2026 with Q1 revenue increasing by 10% to $280 million, or 6.5% on a constant currency basis, compared to Q1 2025. Adjusted EBITDA grew by 10.5% to $135 million, with margins expanding over 20 basis points. The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 guidance, expecting total revenue to range between $1.23 billion and $1.25 billion, and adjusted EBITDA to range from $632 million to $641 million. The reaffirmation of guidance and strong Q1 results could positively influence the stock.

What topics did Sotera Health Company cover?

  • Revenue Growth: Revenue increased by 10% to $280 million, or 6.5% on a constant currency basis. Sterigenics delivered 6.1% constant currency revenue growth, while Nordion achieved 25.8% growth.
  • Adjusted EBITDA Growth: Adjusted EBITDA grew 10.5% to $135 million, with a 6.9% increase on a constant currency basis. Margins expanded by over 20 basis points.
  • Legal Developments: The Georgia State Court dismissed the remaining 5 bellwether cases related to personal injury claims, which management believes underscores the lack of reliable scientific support for remaining claims.
  • Leadership Transition: Michael Petras announced his transition to Executive Chair, with Alton Shader appointed as the new CEO effective May 26, 2026.
  • Segment Performance: Sterigenics and Nordion showed strong performance, while Nelson Labs saw a slight decline in revenue by 0.7% but was in line with expectations.

What were Sotera Health Company's May 5, 2026 results?

  • Revenue: $280 million (vs $254.5 million in Q1 2025, +10% YoY)
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $135 million (+10.5% YoY, margins expanded by over 20 basis points)
  • Net Income: $27 million ($0.09 per diluted share)
  • Adjusted EPS: $0.18 (+29% YoY)
  • Sterigenics Revenue: $186 million (9.7% growth, 6.1% constant currency)
  • Nordion Revenue: $42 million (29% growth, 25.8% constant currency)

Sotera Health's strong Q1 performance and reaffirmed guidance support a positive investment thesis, highlighting the company's resilience and growth potential. Key catalysts include the onboarding of new customers and capacity expansions, while regulatory developments and leadership transitions pose potential risks. Investors should monitor these factors closely.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jason Peterson

executive
#1

Hello everyone, and thanks for joining. I'd like to welcome you to the earnings call for Sotera Health covering our first quarter. You can find today's press release along with the supplemental slides in the Investors area of our site, soterahealth.com. This webcast is currently being taped, and a recording will also be posted in the Investors portion of the Sotera Health site not long after we finish. With me on the call today are our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Petras, as well as our Chief Financial Officer, John Lyons. . Some of what we say on this call might be regarded as forward-looking statements. The subjects covered by these statements carry risks and uncertainties that might lead actual outcomes to differ substantially from what is projected or suggested. For an explanation of these risks and uncertainties, please look at Sotera Health's filings with the SEC and the forward-looking statement slide included at the start of the presentation. No duty is taken by the company to revise any of these forward-looking statements. Be aware that in today's discussion, the company will present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures, which include adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, tax rate applicable to net income, adjusted net income adjusted EPS, adjusted free cash flow, net debt and net leverage ratio as well as constant currency comparisons. You can find a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures for all relevant periods in the schedules accompanying the company's press release and in the supplemental slides for this presentation. The Q&A portion of today's call will be handled by the operator. Kindly keep yourself to 1 question and 1 follow-up. Should you have additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Investor Relations team. Having said that, I'll hand the call over now to Sotera Health Chairman and CEO, Michael Petras.

Michael Petras

executive
#2

Hello, everyone, and thanks for being with us today. Earlier this morning, we reported a solid beginning to the year, with revenue rising 6.5% on a constant currency basis and adjusted EBITDA up 6.9% in constant currency, which produced more than 20 basis points of margin improvement versus Q1 of the prior year. At Sterigenics, constant currency revenue increased 6.1% during the quarter, whereas Nordion posted 25.8% constant currency revenue growth and lifted margins by more than 290 basis points. Nelson Labs came in as expected, matching what we described on our previous earnings call. We are, as of today, reaffirming the 2026 outlook we gave during February's earnings call. To recap, we anticipate total company revenue climbing into a range of $1.23 billion to $1.25 billion, which equals 5% to 6.5% constant currency growth against 2025, and adjusted EBITDA rising into a range of $632 million to $641 million, or 5.5% to 7% growth in constant currency. While reaffirming our full year outlook, I want to restate how strong and resilient our business model is. We deliver mission-critical regulated services that sit deeply embedded within our customers' supply chains. Over 70% of our revenue comes from multiyear contracts serving long-tenured customer relationships via a global network of facilities. Our dedication to customers is a core company value; and during 2025, we achieved substantial gains in customer satisfaction scores at both Sterigenics and Nelson Labs. Over time, our business model has proven resilient, producing steady revenue growth throughout the past 2 decades across numerous economic cycles; we occupy a unique place in the health care supply chain and treat our mission of safeguarding global health with great seriousness. John will cover the financial details shortly, but first, I want to spend a moment highlighting several events from the quarter. On governance, besides adding Rich Kyle to our Board of Directors in February; we are pleased to welcome Ken Krause, who came onto our Board in March. Ken's leadership and demonstrated record of building shareholder value as a public company Chief Financial Officer for more than 10 years, together with his deep experience in strategy, finance and governance, will be enormous assets as we keep growing. I also want to thank Dean Mehas and Robert Kanas, 2 of our private equity board members, for their service and contributions to Sotera Health. Dean just finished his Board service and Rob will step off the Board later this month. Each offered valuable perspective and guidance, and we truly appreciate their impact over the years; in March, the private equity shareholders closed yet another secondary sale of existing shares, lifting our public float to roughly 90% of outstanding shares. Finally, I want to briefly address some favorable legal developments in Georgia. As a reminder, 8 of their personal injury cases were chosen into Phase I and Phase II causation proceedings, with a central focus on the science. The remaining 5 bellwether cases were dismissed by the Georgia State Court on March 30, 2026, after the plaintiff failed to establish general causation during the Phase I proceedings. To recap, back in October of last year, the court threw out the other 3 bellwether cases during the Phase II specific causation proceedings. Every one of the 8 bellwether cases has now been dismissed, and each is subject to appeal. While the order issued March 30 pertains specifically to the 5 Phase I full cases, the court's rejection of the plaintiff's general causation series represents a pivotal issue shared across all of the personal injury cases; in our view, this order highlights how unreliable the scientific support is for those claims that remain and ought to shape the way the remaining cases get evaluated; sound science will stay at the heart of our defense as we continue to stand behind the safety and importance of Sterigenics operations. To recap, updates regarding EO are available on our investor website. At this point, Jon will walk us through the financials in greater detail.

Jonathan Lyons

executive
#3

Thanks, Michael. To start, I’ll walk through the Q1 2026 consolidated highlights, then share specifics for each business segment, and finish with more detail on how we see 2026 shaping up. In the first quarter, looking at the total company on a consolidated basis, revenue rose 10% to $280 million, which was 6.5% higher in constant currency terms versus Q1 2025. GAAP net income came in at $27 million, equal to $0.09 per diluted share. Adjusted EBITDA was up 10.5% to $135 million, or 6.9% in constant currency, and adjusted EBITDA margins widened by more than 20 basis points. Interest expense in Q1 2026 was $35 million, an improvement of $6 million from the same quarter a year earlier. Roughly half of that gain came from the term loan repricing and debt paydown we finished late in Q3 2025, with the rest coming from lower interest rates. Adjusted EPS rose to $0.18 per share, up about 29% year over year. Overall it was a solid first quarter, with results mostly matching what we expected, except for some favorable timing at Nordion. Now let’s turn to the segment results. Sterigenics posted 9.7% revenue growth to $186 million, or 6.1% in constant currency. Revenue growth for the quarter was fueled by favorable pricing of 4.5%, a foreign currency benefit of 3.6%, and improved volume mix of 1.6%. Localized weather effects in the U.S. during Q1 created a 1.7% headwind to Sterigenics volumes compared with the prior year quarter. Segment income increased 9.6% to $96 million, or 6% in constant currency, helped by favorable pricing, a foreign currency tailwind, and improved volume mix, partly offset by higher costs. At Nordion, first quarter revenue rose 29% to $42 million, or 25.8% in constant currency, compared with the same period last year. That was driven mainly by increased volume mix of 23.7% tied to the timing of Cobalt-60 harvest schedules, plus foreign currency tailwinds of 3.2% and a pricing benefit of 2.1%. Nordion segment income climbed approximately 36% to $24 million, or 33.1% in constant currency, with segment income margins expanding more than 290 basis points to 56.4%, driven by higher volume and mix, foreign currency benefits, and favorable pricing, partially offset by inflation. Nelson Labs revenue fell 0.7% to $52 million, or 3.8% in constant currency. Pricing benefits of 2.8% and a foreign currency benefit of 3.1% were more than offset by the change in volume and mix. Segment income declined by 11.5% to $15 million, or 15.1% in constant currency, with margins of 28%, reflecting lower volume mix, partially offset by favorable pricing and a foreign currency tailwind. Now I’ll touch on the balance sheet, cash generation, and capital deployment; in the first quarter, we generated $29 million in positive operating cash flow, including a $34 million payment for a previously disclosed legal settlement. Our adjusted free cash flow came in positive, and we expect that to pick up pace as 2026 goes on. On the capital side, we spent $46 million during the quarter, reflecting continued advancement on the Stardex greenfield builds, the EO facility upgrades, and the Cobalt-60 development efforts. Our liquidity stayed solid — at the close of Q1 2026, we had more than $900 million available. And we ended the quarter at a net leverage ratio of 3.2x, which puts us close to the 2 to 3x long-term target range. Like Michael said, we're reaffirming the 2026 outlook. Here's a recap of what we expect versus 2025. At the total company level, revenue should rise into a range of $1.233 billion to $1.251 billion, which works out to 5% to 6.5% constant currency growth plus an estimated 100 basis point benefit from foreign currency; adjusted EBITDA should climb into a range of $632 million to $641 million, equal to 5.5% to 7% constant currency growth and an estimated 100 basis point impact from foreign currency. That foreign exchange benefit should be entirely realized during the first half of 2026, while the second half impact is expected to be roughly neutral against the prior year. Company-wide pricing should land near the midpoint of our 3% to 4% long-term range; looking at 2026, Sterigenics ought to produce mid- to high single-digit constant currency revenue growth year-over-year, with second quarter year-over-year growth comparable to what we saw in the first quarter of 2026. Keep in mind that Q2 was our strongest growth quarter of 2025. At Nordion, we expect constant currency revenue growth in the low to mid-single digits for 2026. Nordion's first half revenue should account for roughly 40% to 45% of full year 2026 revenue. Turning to Nelson Labs, full year 2026 constant currency revenue growth should come in at low single digits, with a modest return to growth in Q2. Nelson Labs segment income margins should strengthen as the year progresses, yielding full year margins in the low to mid-30s. Given the current forward rate curve, interest expense should land between $135 million and $145 million. We're projecting an effective tax rate on adjusted net income of 27% to 29%. Adjusted EPS should fall in the range of $0.93 to $1.01; depreciation should keep rising in 2026, matching the step-up we saw in 2025. On a weighted average basis, fully diluted shares should be in the range of 289 million to 291 million shares. Capital expenditures should come in between $175 million and $225 million. We look for further improvement in the net leverage ratio during 2026. And last, as always, our guidance assumes no M&A activity; with that, I'll hand the call back to Michael.

Michael Petras

executive
#4

Thank you, Jon. Since 2016, serving as Sotera Health's CEO and Chair has been an honor for me; now that the company stands on solid ground following ten years of advancement, I feel the moment has come for a leadership change that will help Sotera Health keep evolving. After a succession process led by the Board and planned in a thorough manner, the Board has named Alton Shader to take over as SiteHelth's new Chief Executive Officer, starting May 26. Alton brings deep health care executive experience, having led and expanded worldwide health care organizations, among them buying Medical, Hill-Rom and Baxter. In my fresh capacity as Executive Chair and as a substantial investor in this business, I'm eager to collaborate closely with Alton so that the leadership handover is smooth and deliberate; conversations about priorities and what lies ahead for Sotera Health have already begun between us. I will likewise stay actively engaged in investor relations along with commercial and litigation strategies. As I move into my new position, I wish to express gratitude to our Board for the direction and backing given across the last decade. My thanks go to our 3,100 employees for their efforts alongside me and our leaders in keeping this company truly special and a wonderful place to work. I'm also grateful to our investors for standing with us since the company went public in 2020. Rest assured, my belief in our company endures, and I will stay engaged and dedicated to its long-term success; with that, Ray, please open it up for questions.

Sean Dodge

analyst
#5

This is Thomas Keller calling in for Sean. Well, to begin with, Michael, congratulations on 10 years. I'd like to kick things off regarding Sterigenics and how the business has been realigned toward end markets with higher growth. How far along are you all with that strategy? My assumption is that getting the internal pieces arranged takes a while, and then there's winning and onboarding new business on top of that. Did Q1 see any gain on the volume or mix side, or is anything of that sort built into the full year guide?

Michael Petras

executive
#6

Yes. Thanks, Tom. That's a priority for us as an organization. When we examine our activity across business units and our strategic selling efforts, key segments are where we're concentrating. During the quarter, Sterigenics delivered 1.6% growth in volume and mix. And then keep in mind, weather also had an effect on us. So we're pleased. The first quarter got off to a slow start because of the weather, which we more or less indicated the last time we spoke, but it ended on a strong note and we're optimistic about the outlook moving forward, both in terms of how March wrapped up and how the second quarter is beginning.

Analyst

analyst
#7

Next, when we look at capacity, how does utilization currently stand across the various modalities, perhaps relative to historical averages? And given the expansion still ahead, do you possess what's required to sustain a potentially greater degree of growth over the coming several years?

Michael Petras

executive
#8

Yes. Thanks. Yes. On capacity, we're positioned well. Naturally, depending on modality and geography, pinch points will arise at particular moments. Yet our target is 80%. We're positioned well. Operationally, the team has performed nicely and worked to determine how additional output can be drawn from capacity we already have. In the X-ray modality, we have a facility that will begin coming online later in this year. After that, another 1 is scheduled for late '27, early '28, and we feel good about it. So on the whole, our capacity situation is positioned well. We're well situated and take care of our customers very well. On the call, I also mentioned that good customer satisfaction scores keep coming our way; the 2025 results just arrived, and year-over-year we saw a significant improvement. That's true both at Sterigenics and Nelson Labs. So the direction is right; what we see ahead really encourages us.

Brett Fishbin

analyst
#9

I have a brief inquiry regarding Sterigenics. The first quarter is typically viewed as the softest period for that business, yet you managed to beat what was anticipated. Do you continue to view 1Q as the smallest quarter of the year, and then perhaps just to add one more thing. Could you elaborate a bit on what you are observing in core med devices and bioprocessing volumes, specifically for Sterigenics.

Michael Petras

executive
#10

Sure. Sterigenics delivered a strong quarter for us. We would have preferred it to be somewhat stronger, though clearly, weather is outside our control. A year ago, we experienced a notable second quarter, which we have discussed previously; so a solid quarter lies ahead in the second quarter, in line with the guidance we have just given you. We anticipate growth comparable to the first quarter on a constant currency basis. And Med Device posted a good, solid quarter. Looking at every end market we serve, bed device had a good, solid quarter, and bioprocessing rose significantly versus the prior year once more. Keep in mind, however, that it represents a small share of our overall business; nonetheless, it was meaningful growth compared with the previous year.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#11

Michael, congratulations...

Michael Petras

executive
#12

To the agent — fine. Patrick, go ahead.

Patrick Donnelly

analyst
#13

That is the first one. Congratulations on the transition and the move. I suppose maybe one regarding Sterigenics. Could you discuss what you observed on the volume side as the quarter went on, just the visibility there? It seems like you are in a fairly good position, but perhaps walk through the various markets and what you witnessed as the quarter went on and the expectations here moving forward?

Michael Petras

executive
#14

Yes, Patrick, January and February were somewhat softer, as I said, especially tied to weather. However, as the quarter went on, March was our best volume quarter in the last 3 or 4 years for March. So 1 month doesn't make a year, but we are optimistic about that, and April began strongly. So — we feel quite comfortable with the guidance we have provided here, and we are seeing good growth, and we expect that to keep going as the year moves on with some of the items we have, that x-ray facility coming out; we'll see some growth from that. We have a customer conversion that we discussed before that will begin to have an impact late in the year. And then overall, just the amount of engagement with our customers and some of the commitments that we see coming from them. We feel good about how Sterigenics is positioned coming out of the first quarter.

Jonathan Lyons

executive
#15

Patrick, turning to the margin side of things: can you take us through the pieces? Pricing seems to keep working in your favor — anything new to report there? And how should we be thinking about margins as we move forward? Jon here — thanks for asking. We're pleased with where margins stand, consistent with what the guide suggests, right? During the quarter we saw margins improve. And as the guide indicates, we expect improvement across the full year, with Sterigenics really driving that — we look for solid operating leverage there, while margins stay steady across the rest of the segments. Even so, we have strong confidence in the chance to deliver yet another year of margin gains, following the margin gains we achieved in the prior year. So our outlook on that is positive.

Max Smock

analyst
#16

Let me attempt to approach the Sterigenics matter from a different angle. Setting aside the effect of weather, you delivered roughly 8% constant currency during 1Q, indicated that you anticipate comparable constant currency expansion inthenextperioddespite April getting off to a robust beginning, and the weather factor is absent. Does that represent a deceleration compared with the 8% excluding weather? Is this merely a comparison problem? Is it simply being cautious? Or might there be additional elements at play that we ought to consider regarding Sterigenics during the second quarter.

Michael Petras

executive
#17

Yes. Thank you, Max. The key point, which I referenced earlier in my script, is that Q2 of the prior year represented our strongest quarter for growth; therefore, it truly comes down to a comparison matter rather than anything else.

Max Smock

analyst
#18

Then perhaps one about Nelson Labs. You mentioned it matched what you'd anticipated for the quarter. Could you walk us through how testing growth compares with expert advisory services, and specifically, what kind of drag did the latter create in 2Q? Also, margins declined quite sharply versus the prior year. So please explain what drove that. And a forecast for that segment's margins across the rest of the year would be really useful too.

Michael Petras

executive
#19

Sure. Thanks, Max. Michael here. It landed exactly where we anticipated, as we told you. Regarding Nelson during the first quarter, what we observe. EAS — this marks the final quarter carrying that drag as we lap it; testing volumes dipped somewhat against the previous year. Yet looking at certain activity, routine volumes are recovering. Our service in that space has been exceptional; and with sterilization volume rising, that same correlation and momentum on routine testing will keep showing up. It isn't strictly one for one, though a correlation does exist. Then regarding validation, we're beginning to see pipeline form in certain longer-term projects as we move toward the later stages of 2026; we've indicated margins reaching the low to mid-30s, matching what we've discussed on this subject across the past several quarters.

Joe Downing

analyst
#20

Congratulations, Michael. I'd like to approach the topic of Sterigenics from a somewhat different angle. The margin expansion in 1Q was clearly strong, even with the headwinds caused by weather. Yet when we consider the wider inflationary environment, could you assist us in assessing how sustainable Sterigenics margins will be across the year, and whether ongoing cost inflation might actually give the team a chance to capture additional price during the year?

Michael Petras

executive
#21

Yes. Thank you, Joseph. We aren't observing meaningful inflation within that business. We keep managing it effectively. Our primary inputs are essentially labor, plus gas and cobalt. We're positioned well on those. We've established pricing in a manner that ensures our value stays positive; during the quarter, Sterigenics recorded roughly 4.5% price, a bit higher than the 4% we had guided toward; however, we still view that business as being in a solid position and receiving rewards for the value it delivers to our customers. And nothing material on the inflation front worries us as we stand here today.

Joe Downing

analyst
#22

Understood. Then you mentioned a bit ago that big client going live should happen later in this year. Could you share anything further regarding, say, gauging the size of that client or how we ought to view the ramp across the remaining months? And whether it's included within the guidance.

Michael Petras

executive
#23

Yeah. So our guidance does account for that. It's going to land late in the year. That client matters a lot, though it isn't enormous. We aren't putting up a plant or anything close to that scale to serve business like that. Still, it's a major victory for us, both for morale and simply to help strengthen the value proposition of the company; but on the whole, we have that factored into our outlook for the remainder of this year within the guide, and it will show up late in the year.

Luke Sergott

analyst
#24

This is Sam calling in for Luke. Michael, congratulations on the company's 10 years. Working with you has been a real pleasure, and I wish you the best as Executive Chair. I'd like to discuss the Trump administration a bit and what they've announced about possibly rolling back certain ethylene oxide emissions rules on a permanent basis. Could you walk through the various scenarios that could result and what the top line impact of those might be? I know people have mentioned this as a possible opportunity, with tighter regulations hitting some of the smaller industry players. And also — how would that shape CapEx spending, both near term and long term?

Michael Petras

executive
#25

Yes. Sam, thank you for those comments and questions. As you're aware, we are executing — we've invested a substantial amount of CapEx into Sterigenics, roughly $200 million across that period, and what we refer to as general facility enhancements tied to this ethylene oxide work. Our team is executing that very well. The vast majority of it ought to be finished here in 2026. A rule exists today that gives us another couple of years before those requirements must be met. But a new proposed rule has now appeared. Look, we're proceeding as though the rule currently on the books will be the requirement, and our teams are aligned while the engineering teams execute against those plans. I can't say for certain how the administration will decide on this. Our responsibility is ensuring we operate safely and in compliance, and we're doing everything we can to position the facility as well as possible; so we're continuing forward with those plans. We'll submit comments, as many others across the industry will, on the new proposed rule; based on what we observed in that proposed rule, these will still be — they'll remain tough restrictions; they're somewhat less stringent than the rule recently issued, yet they're still tough and challenging rules, and we believe we're very well positioned to satisfy those requirements. When it comes to opportunities for us, the exact final rule and its timing will dictate how large that opportunity is. What I'd say is this — there are a couple of Opportunity 1 customers, the ones we just mentioned, that are in the process of moving over to us. Beyond that, there are a few smaller ones where conversations are still ongoing. We do see some opportunity there. I'd describe the activity as having cooled somewhat across the past several quarters, given the uncertainty around when the new rule requirements will land. But once more, we believe our position is very strong regardless of what the rule ends up being, and our focus will simply be on operating safely and in compliance for every one of our state employees and the communities as well.

Analyst

analyst
#26

Perhaps a separate question regarding Nordion's pricing. My sense is it arrived a bit under what we normally see, roughly 2.1%. Is there anything worth highlighting?

Michael Petras

executive
#27

No. What I'd say is that for the entire company we have a long-range guide of 3% to 4%; we indicated Nordea would sit at the lower end of that range, near 3%. That's what you should keep in mind. It simply comes down to our timing and the mix of customers, specifically which ones received shipments during the quarter. On price execution, we're in good shape at Nordion and throughout the business.

Jaden Rismay

analyst
#28

This is Jaden, filling in for Casey. I also wanted to ask something quick about pricing, number 1, but could you walk us through what you're assuming on pricing for 2026 and point out whether anything has shifted when you look at it by segment? I know you just brought up Nordion, but anything beyond that would be useful.

Michael Petras

executive
#29

Yes. No, nothing has changed relative to what we've said before. It would fall in the 3% to 4% range. Like I said, just physical Norbe at the low end of the range. Now some would sit at the low end of that range, and Sterigenics would sit at the high end of that range; as far as our outlook goes, we don't see anything changing there.

Michael Petras

executive
#30

Kevin here, filling in for Ryan, with a couple of quick questions. Did 1Q '26 include an additional selling day that helped you? If it did, what was the effect on your growth rates?

Michael Petras

executive
#31

Extremely small.

Ryan Halston

analyst
#32

Moving to something else entirely — back in '25, you mentioned that your EU customers were expanding faster than the company as a whole. Could you share how SBU has been doing across the first half of 2016 so far? And are there any chances you have to push that SBU penetration even further?

Michael Petras

executive
#33

Yeah. Appreciate the question; that area gave us a solid first quarter, with growth once again. And like I said before, our customer satisfaction scores came in quite strong, with notable improvement there too. So on the whole, things are going quite well in the — and keep in mind, there's considerable strength surrounding the embedded labs within the Nelson, within Sterigenics to Nelson labs that coexist. We keep delivering in that area as well. So Xfeis in a pretty good position. .

Mike Polark

analyst
#34

Michael, congratulations and best of luck. If you were bringing someone on board, my assumption was you'd have dropped the Investor Relations role. That way you wouldn't need to handle people such as me and the clients I serve. Still, it caught me off guard to learn that duty remains among your continuing responsibilities, so...

Michael Petras

executive
#35

My aim was to get rid of the litigation, yet the board refused to allow that, believe me.

Mike Polark

analyst
#36

Yeah, my different wisecrack that I was freshly on was, I'm certain you can picture activities with more enjoyment than protecting multistate toxic tort cases; so in any case — but indeed, congratulations — okay. A couple of things from me. During the quarter, I value the mention of weather for Sterigenics. As I remember, a portion of the 1Q guidance additionally took into account sort of extra maintenance downtime. I didn't catch that being called out. Would you point to that as a meaningful item during the quarter regarding Sterigenics volumes? And afterward, John, perhaps regarding the balance of the year. What's sort of the maintenance timetable throughout the network? Anything out of the ordinary you'd want us to consider Q3 to 4Q?

Michael Petras

executive
#37

Yes. I'm going to hand it to John to respond. Only 1 point, Michael, regarding that. It's 1 item as I stated concerning the customer joining, plus the focus we're receiving from our customers on a few of the outlook items as well as Hall River joining. What I neglected to say was additionally the quantity of days out during the second half will be reduced; and Jon.

Jonathan Lyons

executive
#38

There's nothing more I'd tack on, except to say that same thing again. The days of downtime act as a headwind compared with last year during the first half, in terms of a — in the second half. That helps.

Mike Polark

analyst
#39

Nelson, when you say the second quarter might see a slight rebound or a move back to slight growth, how slight is slight? Does that mean 1%, or is it something stronger than that?

Michael Petras

executive
#40

My sense is it lands in that range you just mentioned, or perhaps lower.

Michael Petras

executive
#41

Alright, thanks. Heading into 2026, the momentum we have is heartening, and with our financial standing getting stronger, we stay sure of our capacity to generate growth over the long term, robust cash flow, and value for shareholders. Our position as a leader in a sizable, expanding market, worldwide reach, know-how in regulation, free cash flows that are picking up speed, and capital allocation done with discipline put us in a truly strong spot for growth that lasts. So we're eager to meet plenty of you at the conferences lined up in the coming weeks during spring and the start of summer, but we appreciate your ongoing backing, and enjoy the rest of your day. Thanks.

Operator

operator
#42

That brings an end to our call. We appreciate you joining us for today's presentation. You're welcome to hang up at this point.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sotera Health Company transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Sotera Health Company earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Sotera Health Company or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.