Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited (501423) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 8, 2022

BSE Limited IN Industrials Machinery earnings 62 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited Q1 FY '23 Earnings Conference Call. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements about the company, which are based on the beliefs, opinions and expectations of the company as on date of this call. These statements are not the guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. [Operator Instructions] And there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Amit Sanghvi, MD, Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited. Thank you, and over to you, sir.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#2

Thank you very much. Good morning, and a very warm welcome to all the participants to the post results earnings call of Shaily Engineering Plastics. I have with me Mr. Sanjay Shah, our Chief Strategy Officer; and SGA, our Investor Relations advisers. I hope you had a chance to look at our investor presentation that is uploaded both on our website as well as the stock exchange. I am very happy to share that while we have registered our highest quarterly revenue in quarter 1 of FY '23 at INR 172 crores. However, I'm sure everyone has this question on their mind, so I'd like to address it upfront that we've also registered lower than normalized margin. We had some rate of significant challenges in quarter 1 of FY '23, particularly with respect to rising material prices, as well as rising or weakening rupee against the dollar, which have both resulted in margins taking a hit. We anticipate these margins to normalize by quarter 3 of this financial year. We have witnessed significant improvement -- improved traction across various verticals, and we have very strong visibility that gives us immense confidence that we will be able to scale up further and grow including margins. We are deepening our foray into the intellectual property that we're developing in the U.K. for Healthcare. Healthcare is now our second largest revenue contributing segment. During the quarter, we finalized contracts for 2 additional pen injectors with leading pharmaceutical companies. We've built a scalable model, which will help us achieve higher revenue growth in the coming years. We've also embarked on a journey to create a new drug delivery technology that will be groundbreaking and leading -- world-leading for oncology, where currently the therapies are administered by health care practitioners in hospitals. We intend to change this by taking the drug delivery at home. We're also deepening our foray in Contract Manufacturing and Medical Devices, where I'm happy to announce that we've just signed an agreement with the customer to manufacture powder inhalers for them. Under our automotive and engineering, we have started commercializing orders that we received and expect ramp up in the current year as we had mentioned in earlier calls. Last year, we raised funds and have started utilizing it to expand our core business of home furnishing toys, as well as towards Healthcare. We are planning a CapEx spend of approximately INR 200 crores over the next 2 years, out of which more than half of the spending will be towards the pharma part of our business. This will be towards scaling up the existing devices that we have spent years developing and putting on clinical batches for customers as well as for new IP-led devices that we're currently in the process of developing them and handing over to customers. That is all from my side. I shall now hand over the call to Sanjay Shah, our Chief Strategy Officer, to give you the operating and financial highlights. Thank you very much.

Sanjay Shah

executive
#3

Thank you, Amit. Good morning, everyone. I should share with you the highlights of our operation and financial performance of Q1 FY '23. Following this, we will be happy to respond to your queries. During the quarter, we processed 6,544 tons of polymers as against 4,098 tons in Q1 FY '22, an increase of 60% year-on-year. In Q1 FY '23, we've already achieved 34% of the volumes of FY '22 in the current quarter. Machine utilization rate stood at around 50% in Q1 FY '23. Exports during FY '23 stood at 80.4% of total revenue as compared to 76.1% in FY '22. I should now brief you on the standalone result highlights. Revenue stood at INR 172 crores during FY '23 as compared to INR 120.1 crores during Q1 FY '22, a growth of 43%. This is our highest quarter [ reach ] as mentioned by Amit. EBITDA stood at INR 21.7 crores during Q1 FY '23 as compared to INR 20.2 crores during Q1 FY '22, a growth of 8%. EBITDA margin stood at 12.6% for Q1 FY '23. As mentioned by Amit, margins have been the pressure for a couple of quarters due to increase in raw material prices. These costs would be passed on as we go in the future. PAT stood at INR 7.4 crores during Q1 FY '23 as compared to INR 8 crores during Q1 FY '22. PAT margin stood at 4.3%. Cash PAT for Q1 FY '23 was reported at INR 15.2 crores as compared to INR 13.9 crores during Q1 FY '22, a growth of 9%. On a consolidated basis, revenue stood at INR 175 crores, EBITDA at INR 24.3 crores and PAT at INR 9.5 crores for Q1 FY '23. We don't have a comparable for Q1 FY '22. So we're not having any comparative numbers there. We would like to highlight that on the basis of recent adjustments including operation and financial performance of the company, CARE ratings have agreed to our long term rating to -- from A1- with a stable outlook for our long-term bank facilities of INR 270.17 crores, and the short-term bank facilities have been upgraded from CARE A2 to CARE A1. This is all from our side. We can now open the floor for Q&A.

Operator

operator
#4

We now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Manish Gupta from Solidarity Advisors.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#5

My question is that my understanding is, and please correct me if I'm wrong, that your business model is primarily a complete raw material pass-through model. And with your largest customer, that's the European -- can you hear me?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#6

Okay. [indiscernible] We couldn't hear you.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#7

I'm going to repeat. So I said my understanding is that our business model is...

Sanjay Shah

executive
#8

Your voice is breaking. I'm sorry.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#9

I Sanjay, I think it's your network. I can hear Manish very well.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#10

How much should I wait for Sanjay to get back?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#11

No, I will try to answer it, Manish, why don't you go ahead.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#12

Okay. So my question is, Amit, that as my understanding is, that your business model is primarily a complete raw material pass-through model. And with our largest customer, our billing is in rupee. So we are also hedged for currency. So my question is that how does one interpret the quarter-on-quarter gross margin decline? I'm saying practically, from a medium-term perspective, this metric -- does it mean anything? Because if your revenue is on a formula basis linked to raw material prices, even if raw material prices were to crash or move up, over the medium term, your absolute cash gross margin remains the same. Is that understanding correct?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#13

Yes and no. See, there is a material margin that is charged and there is also a manufacturing margin, which is charged. So what happens in a scenario when you have rising material prices quarter-on-quarter, is that we get the effect of the rise in the last quarter during this quarter and the rise during -- of this quarter in the next quarter. Then the other thing that plays out is the product mix for each quarter and the volumes for -- the volumes that we manufacture and sell. So for example, if we've done the best quarter we have in the current quarter and sales go up and we get the price increase, we benefit out of it or we at least negate the margin erosion of the previous quarters. But if volume comes down, even though you get the material revision, you benefit less. You will have some losses that you make because you've not done the same volumes. So product mix volume also plays a little bit of a role. Throughout in a given year, it balances out. But unfortunately, we are in some unusual times at the moment. So we are seeing product mix changes. We are seeing certain products going up in volume, certain products coming down in volume. And it has a little to do with the customer strategy as well because there's limited capacity in terms of logistics available. So prioritizing products, which are the best sellers is always going to be key for them to sustain their business. Did that make sense for you?

Manish Gupta

analyst
#14

Yes. So I have a follow-up on this. So what I hear you say is that under the assumption, for example, that these are only selling one SKU. And let's say it was 100 units, and that remains flat. Then no matter what happens to commodity prices or the rupee, your cash flow remains preserved over time. Is that understanding right?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#15

Yes. As a percentage of it goes up or down, but the value part probably remains the same over a period of time.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#16

Okay. So what I didn't understand is that now I understand product mix, but if volumes go up, right? So let's say that you're growing pretty rapidly. Your volumes were up 50% Q-on-Q, give or take. So if commodity prices have gone up, are you saying that you will lose out because you know you not get -- you will get a lower raw material adjustment based on the higher volume. Is that what you're saying?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#17

No. So think about it. Our raw material buying cycles on average are -- we will keep -- we will have stock of no more than 20 days in raw material, for example, whereas the price revision with the customer is quarterly. So you have one price revision every 3 months. So whatever I have supplied in Q1 FY '23, I've also bought substantial, barring 3 weeks, I have bought the most substantial amount in Q1 FY '23. So the prices I've paid in [ rupee ] in Q1 FY '23 are substantially higher than Q4 of FY '22.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#18

Okay. My second question is...

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#19

We've seen risk revision in Q2. We will get this adjustment in Q2.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#20

And if the prices completely collapse, it's not as if the customer will not give you the adjustment. The Will give you the adjustment for the higher price than...

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#21

No, the same formula applies. So prices collapse -- prices collapse, so our margins go up because, for example, we've paid the highest -- I mean, material have been at the highest in Q1 FY '22. And if prices start to come down, then we will benefit from prices going down.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#22

Okay. My second question and final question on it, is that we are seeing across the board opportunity in China in [ Sichuan ]. I guess in some of the segments that you are in, their opportunity is quite strong, toys, furnishings. So can you just talk a little bit, and you have mentioned in some of the similar prior calls. But what are we doing for talent retention as we scale up? Because this is manufacturing. So I guess you need a lot of talent on the design and manufacturing side. So can you talk a little bit about what you're doing for that?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#23

Sure, sure. So again, I'm glad that you asked this question. We've brought down our attrition from 14%, 15% down through -- very close to 10% over the last 2 quarters. We have great camaraderie within the teams. What we have done is we've introduced the performance linked incentives, where a portion of the -- portion of our employee salary up to level of senior management, too, is all based on PLI. So based on performance, quarterly performance of the company, as well as quarterly performance of the team and then the individual. So we've seen that this has been a great motivation for people to, a, to perform higher, to do better continuously. And we see the results of that, especially when it comes to manufacturing. Unfortunately, our utilization is low because the order book, while we've done INR 175 crores, the order book is not what we anticipated it to be. So that's playing a bit of a downer. But overall, our retention has gone up, employee retention has gone up substantially, and we are introducing a long-term -- long-term wealth creation for a certain -- up to a certain level of employees so that we improve that further.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#24

Okay. And perhaps if I can slip in the last one on the PAT. Given what you're seeing, how the world is evolving, I guess, there are some recessionary headwinds, but there are also tailwinds of global supply chain, diversifying. On a rolling 5-year basis, would you venture a number of what you'd be disappointed by if Shaily does not reach in 5 years from now?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#25

Put me on the spot, right?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#26

Amit, I think we would retain from [indiscernible].

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#27

Actually, yes. I think if Shaily does not achieve an average CAGR of 17% to 20% year-on-year, I would be very disappointed. Given year, it could be bad. But overall, I think you should still get there.

Operator

operator
#28

The next question is from the line of Ritesh Shah from Investec.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#29

A couple of questions. First, continuing with the prior question. What percentage of our volumes will have a cost of arrangement you explained on the price revisioning that was useful. But just wanted to get a number on percentage of volumes, which will have a cost for a pass-through arrangement?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#30

As for pass-through arrangement, some pass through on a quarterly basis, some pass through on a 6 monthly basis, some pass through on a yearly basis.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#31

But most of our volumes, right? Did I hear okay?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#32

I would say that 80% of our business passes through on a quarterly basis or more.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#33

That's perfect. Okay. My second question is, Amit, in your initial remarks, you did mention about Healthcare. You did mention about inhaler device and a new mechanism to get the delivery at home. Possibly, if you could provide some more color over here?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#34

Two separate projects. One is we've developed a new technology. I hope -- I will explain about it more in upcoming quarterly calls. Too soon to talk about it. But basically, it's for oncology therapies where the patients are required to take very large volume drips currently at hospitals. So we're trying to develop something, which -- where they can do their same activity at home. The second is that we have gotten into a contract with someone to manufacture dry powder inhaler.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#35

This dry powder inhaler, any quantum -- any time lines over here or the size of the market that you are looking to cater?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#36

No, it's a contract manufacturing -- because it's a contract manufacturing job, it purely depends on how the customer does. So here, I will not be able to give you any further information at this point. Once product is fully Industrial, we will be able to give you some indications. So that's going to be 12 months out.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#37

Sure. And lastly, in our prior conference calls, you have indicated about the ramp up [ 33% ] that we are looking at on insulin pens. We have also indicated that we have a number of innovative products which are there. Any color over here?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#38

That business is growing well. We're making a lot of headwind in now also different geographies of the world. So we have currently targeted Middle East where we see great volume opportunity scale up in '24 and '25, and so the earlier indication stands through even today.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#39

Would it be possible to indicate the number of pens produced? I think the earlier number was, I think, 7 million pens per year. And we were looking to a ramp up of nearly 20 million over the next 2 years. Any updates over here? And if you can split it between contract manufacturing versus IT, that would be useful.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#40

All right. So currently, contract manufacturing would account for 60% of the pens. I would say 60%, maybe 65% or 55% or 65%, let's say, somewhere around there. Its changes. It's quite dynamic and the rest would be our own IP. We see the IP growing significantly. So when we gave the indication of 20 million over 3 years, most of that will come from our own pens. [indiscernible] will come from our own pens.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#41

That's quite encouraging. And where are we right now, what is the 20 million pens number? Are we around about 7 or have we moved up?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#42

Yes, somewhere around 6 million, 6.5 million pens.

Ritesh Shah

analyst
#43

Sure. And just last question. I think in the prior question, you did indicate that the order book is not to what we expected, can you provide some color segment-wise in any particular reason? I presume it would be on back of logistics or the global macro. If you will provide some color about that.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#44

It's purely the global slowdown in logistics and price -- price rise. But from a segment perspective, we've not provided it in the past. And unfortunately, I will not be able to provide that right now.

Operator

operator
#45

Next question is from the line of Pritesh Chheda from Lucky Investment Managers.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#46

Congratulations for a fairly good traction in revenues. Just for 2 questions, one on the gross margin side. So we were about 40%, now we are about 33%. So there's about 5% to 7% loss in gross margin. When do you see this getting recouped? And when do you see the incremental contributions or the incremental business from the Pharma side start kicking in, which would then influence the next leg of gross margin expansion? So this is my first question. And my second question is usually at the beginning of the year, you have some broader revenue target for FY -- for the fiscal ongoing year. It would be nice if you could share what should be now the expected revenue for FY '23 if it is possible to share?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#47

Thanks, Pritesh. I think let me answer your second question first. We're very hopeful we maintain similar momentum as we come in quarter 1. Quarter 1 has been exceptional. I will not lie, quarter 2 is at best going to be as good as quarter 1. But we anticipate ramp-up in quarter 3 and quarter 4. On the margin side as well, with the pharma kicking in, you will see margin expansion. You will first see normalizing of margins in quarter 3. And then an expansion of those margins. I don't know how much, but some expansion of those margins in quarter 4 because we do have significant deliveries planned in quarter 4 for the Pharma business.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#48

Okay. When you mentioned that you will be hopeful to maintain the quarter 1 traction -- is it INR 175 crores in Q4? Is that how we should look at your business with quarter 4 seeing further expansion of the revenue? Because Pharma will start kicking, that's how I should read your answer or a different answer should read?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#49

It's very difficult for me to tell how demand will pan out this year. What we see is quarter 4, we have additional Pharma revenue from the INR 175 crores that we've done. So we should grow in revenue in quarter 3 and quarter 4. But quarter 2, I'm telling you right now because we're already in August. So I know for the fact that we're -- at best, we're going to do INR 175 crores or somewhere a little less than that, yes.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#50

Okay. And lastly, sir, what is the progress now at the Furniture factory, which you are trying to stabilize and ramp up over the past 1, 1.5 years. So where are you on that journey?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#51

On the Steel? [indiscernible] sorry ? Did you say something?

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#52

Yes, no, no. because [indiscernible].

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#53

Yes. So again, Steel Furniture factory, we -- our manufacturing capability has improved. Our learning -- we have come over the learning curve when it comes to fabrication of sheet metal. We have some challenges in power coatings, but we have improved significantly. Again, what we're seeing, Pritesh, unfortunately, is that we've seen demand drop in quarter 2. So whatever manufacturing gains we have in terms of efficiency, in terms of quality, in terms of rejection, unfortunately, will not really give great numbers in quarter 2.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#54

But have you stabilized the [ sheeting ] problems in the factory?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#55

I would say 80% of our problems -- 85% of our problems have been resolved. We had some for which we have seeked external expertise -- external consultants as experts, and we will be resolving them.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#56

And what is the utilization at Furniture factory?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#57

Usually, we don't see about [indiscernible] that.

Pritesh Chheda

analyst
#58

No problem, sir. Okay. Lastly, sir, if you could share the CapEx number now for '23 and '24?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#59

Because your CapEx numbers will stand same as what we talked about last time. We're looking at investing about somewhere between INR 100 crores and INR 120 crores this year. A majority of that will go into our expansion across Pharma facilities. That's what's going to be the CapEx number this year.

Operator

operator
#60

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Aman Vij from Astute Investments.

Aman Vij

analyst
#61

First, on the gross margin and EBITDA margin side. So if you see our gross margin has fallen by 7%, 8%. But the fall in EBITDA margin has been less at around 4%. So whenever in Q3 or Q4, we expect the gross margin to go back and maybe then Pharma will kick in, can our EBITDA margin be much -- if not much, but higher than the average 16%, 17%, which we used to do historically?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#62

Yes, that's what we expect going forward. I don't know in terms of timeline, what it would be. But yes, if we were to look at between this year and next year, we do expect margin improvement happening over that period.

Aman Vij

analyst
#63

Next question is to Amit sir, on the pen side, you have talked about you see most of the traction for this year in Q4. So are we on track to our target of around 9 million pens this year and around 12 million pens as you have talked about for next year?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#64

No, no, it's 6 million, 6.5 million pens, going to 20 million in 2 to 3 years. That is what we have said. So we are on target for that. And we've done a decent Pharma sales in quarter 1, we manufactured and are selling more in quarter 2 for Pharma as well. So you see good Pharma traction before the end of this year.

Aman Vij

analyst
#65

And so that 10 million number is [ halfway ]. Do we expect to drop next year, the [indiscernible] jump up will happen next year?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#66

So I'm filing the launch of the 2-year cycle typically. So next year, yes, I think we should get somewhere close to 10 million at least. I don't know how much, maybe 9 million, maybe 8.5 million.

Aman Vij

analyst
#67

So it's totally back ended? Because from 6 million to 20 million, we are not very sure of this year or next year ramp-up happening, but then 2.5 years will happen [indiscernible].

Sanjay Shah

executive
#68

Yes, because it's always going to be -- that's the cycle, that's the approval cycle. It's not, Aman, it's not that we're not sure. Global volumes are there, it's just about how it's going to happen. And there's a great plan with the customer in terms of it. As Amit mentioned, there will be [indiscernible] that is given. There will be budget given for trials and everything. So for those trials, you know what quantities we are supposed to give. And post that, we move with the ramp-up, which is going to -- so that's the cycle which happens for the business.

Aman Vij

analyst
#69

Sure, sir. Next question on the Toys division. We have talked about this year to be a little soft. Any change on this part? Any new customer addition we are trying? Any new campaigns we are trying because a lot of -- we see a lot of emphasis on the toys manufacturing in India. Given we haven't lead, we have done quite well up to now. But to reach to the next level, are we putting more effort? Are we trying to talk to more customers -- more orders from same customer, if you can talk a little bit about the steps we are taking to ramp up Toys division.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#70

So Aman, what we're doing is we are in discussions with existing customers to add more products. And at the same time, we are in discussions with new customers also. Again, here, what's happened there -- because of the global slowdown and unwinding, which has happened. Global demand for toys has come down as compared to last year. So while we are in discussions, we should be able to give you some better clarity as we move forward.

Aman Vij

analyst
#71

Sure, sir. Final question on the employee addition which we are targeting for this year, if you can talk about it.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#72

Sorry, I didn't understand that question.

Aman Vij

analyst
#73

We have 1,800 to 2,000 employees. Any number you have in mind for the addition for this year?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#74

We're not signing any additions, anything major is for additions or employee [indiscernible].

Aman Vij

analyst
#75

Yes. We're adding people in key positions as required. Amit, we want to talk about this year, which you're looking at, give some just...

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#76

We've said before, we will close the CEO mandate before the end of this calendar year, and we will have someone on board with us. And that remains -- we're on the right track in terms of timing to achieve that.

Operator

operator
#77

The next question is from the line of Nikhil Jain from Galaxy International.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#78

Just a couple of questions. So looking at your commentary in the -- initial commentary, it seems for, at least to my mind, it was that we are shifting towards more on the Healthcare side as an organization. So 3-year timeline, 3 to 5 years timeline, where do you see sale? So the Healthcare contribution right now in second largest. Will it become the largest contributor to the business in maybe 3 to 5 years?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#79

It will remain second largest even in 3 to 5 years.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#80

Okay. Okay. And then second question is related to the patent that you have acquired actually last quarter and this quarter also, I think there was some IP on the cost. So what is that, let's say, if you can throw a little bit of light on what are the patents that you acquired? And what's the kind of news that you will see on that.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#81

Last quarter, we talked about an auto-injector. Yes. So the difference between a pen injector and an auto-injector is that typically, an auto-injector is a 2-step device, where the amount of medicine to be injected is already predetermined. So the user does not have to dial a dose like you do in a pen injector or decide the quantity of the dose. Here, the user simply has to take a cap off and inject. So it's meant for different therapies. And typically, in a pen injector, you're delivering lower volumes whereas in an auto-injector would typically, I'm not saying this is true all the time, but you typically deliver, I think, more or less than 0.25 ml to as high as maybe 2.25 ml in one shot.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#82

So we acquired some IP related to that device, right?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#83

We developed, yes. We acquired and we developed further. So we are looking at commercializing that auto-injector in the current financial year.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#84

Okay. Okay. And one more question that I just wanted to ask, sir, was that -- on the on -- one of the peptide devices that you have some customers on, so has any of our customers receive [indiscernible] approval?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#85

Yes, depending on first approval for first quarter approval this year, we seems to be on track for it.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#86

Right. And it would be a global MNC, right?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#87

It is, yes.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#88

Okay. And just the last question. So the CapEx of INR 150-odd crores that we are spending over the next 1.5, 2 years. So can you just give the breakup? I missed it actually in your initial remarks and I just missed it. So if you can just please highlight it again, how much to run care and how much for other businesses?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#89

It's going to be more than 50% to Healthcare. I think about 50 -- I need to give an exact number. Sorry, how much is underline, 16% to Healthcare [indiscernible] It will probably be 70, 30.

Nikhil Jain

analyst
#90

70, 30, fair enough. Right. Okay. And see, generally, the terms on -- especially the Healthcare CapEx should be reasonably high as compared to the other CapEx that is more on the contract transaction basis. So do you agree with that? Or is that my understanding correct?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#91

No. We have to be patient with time.

Sanjay Shah

executive
#92

Yes. sales turnover would probably be lower as compared to contract manufacturing, margins and turn on ROC we have on the long-term basis, would be much higher.

Operator

operator
#93

Next question is from the line of Bhavin Rupani from Investec.

Bhavin Rupani

analyst
#94

I have one question, sir. Can you give us some visibility and idea of the Toys and information segments?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#95

Sorry, could you repeat your question?

Bhavin Rupani

analyst
#96

Can you give us some visibility and idea about your Toys and information segments, please?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#97

So full polishing were compared to what we did last year, we will grow this year. We would probably grow at a slower pace as compared to what we would have talked about growing 6 months back, but we will still grow this year. On Toys, as we have talked last time, whatever be the last time, we would basically be looking at similar numbers in the current year and then growing next year.

Operator

operator
#98

[Operator Instructions] Next question is from the line of Manish Gupta from Solidarity Advisors.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#99

Wanted to check that how many years typically do we depreciate our equipment over? And what is the true useful life of the equipment?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#100

So Manish, typically for our machines, we take useful life of 15 years for our equipment and then we run 3 ships. So equipments get depreciated between 7 to 10 years. the useful life sorry. So useful life is 15 years based on a single-ship working. So when you look at a 3-ship working, it will depreciate between 7 to 10 years depending on the usage. At the same time, if you look at injection molding machines and [indiscernible] machines, which are 15-year old, 20-year-old or even higher, which are in operation and which are running very well.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#101

So would it be fair to say that the useful life is at least 2x the life over which a typical machine is depreciated?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#102

I think that would be a sort of sense to me, yes.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#103

And do we take maintenance CapEx to the P&L account or to the balance sheet?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#104

Some of it goes through the P&L account. Some of it goes through the balance sheet. Depending on if it's a major overhaul of an equipment where you are adding [ GST ] probably go to the balance sheet. So it's a normal routine warranty and everything, it would basically be on the P&L.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#105

Okay. And you mentioned that you're undergoing the CapEx program, a lot of that is for the pen, and there will be a portion of the CapEx that, I guess, is for toys and for furnishings. Now given that you -- I think either you or Amit made a comment that you're not seeing so much of demand because the toys, how do you think about CapEx in the context of businesses which could face recessionary headwinds, given also that the Steel Furniture business is not picking up. So how do you guys think about making CapEx decisions when you see the rest of the world, we've seen that the developed part of the world facing quite a lot of recessionary headwinds. Could you just talk us to the thought process there?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#106

Yes. Amit, you want to take that or you want me to take that?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#107

No, I can take it. Well historically, Pharma is a business where we made CapEx decisions based on our judgment, calculations, discussions with customers and the pipeline that we have. And if you look at this year's CapEx, a very significant portion is going to the Pharma business, not the other -- on the other businesses, we only take CapEx decision based on confirmed businesses. We don't invest anything without confirmation. Now again, we are in unusual times right now where confirm businesses have seen drop in volumes. We try to be as meticulous in taking CapEx decisions as possible on the non-pharma business. And unless we have confirmation, we will not invest a [indiscernible].

Manish Gupta

analyst
#108

Okay. And when your customer will not need to form the higher probability order book, do you get compensated for that in some way -- higher margins in future orders or perhaps higher volumes? How does the customer compensate you?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#109

So Manish, that obviously takes time to happen. It does not happen immediately. Yes, we did discussions to negotiate which you have with the customers. The customer would take that into account. And keep that in mind, when new businesses get awarded or higher volumes get pitched for, so those are things which the customer does take into consideration in terms of commitments made by...

Manish Gupta

analyst
#110

Okay. And my last question is what are some of the risks that you guys are seeing right now or risks that you are conscious about?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#111

So Manish, I will let probably Amit answer part of it. But a couple of things which we're seeing -- what's happening on global headwinds -- actually a recession happens in the U.S. is something we do not know how demand will pan out. We -- so that's one thing which we see as a risk.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#112

So Manish, our goal is to create a business vertical, which is also more domestic. So we need to increase our domestic supply. That's what we see as a risk right now. That's what I see as a very significant risk. And we want to -- we will continue to do whatever we're doing for exports, but we want to increase our domestic business very significantly.

Manish Gupta

analyst
#113

Will you get the same margin on domestic orders, vis-a-vis, export orders?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#114

The immediate answer is no. If we do the same thing we do for exports in domestic market, we will not likely get the same margin. We have to think of different product portfolio. So something's in the works, we can't comment on it right now, but we -- we don't think it will pan out in the current financial year. But in the upcoming financial year, we would see some progress -- good progress there.

Operator

operator
#115

Next question is from the line of [ Chirag Jain ] from Kamakhya Wealth Management.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#116

So I have broad questions. If we compare Shaily in 2018 versus Shaily in 2022. So we had Shaily in 2018, which had a long order book, but it couldn't be executed due to some labor issues or due to operational issues. But now we have seen that we have order reducing an operational capacity increasing. So what do you like to say on that?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#117

The good thing is we have sorted out our operational issues, which means we don't have labor issues. Our efficiencies are also higher in the plants. We have -- our processes have become more streamlined, more robust. And fingers crossed, we see demand pick up again. It will really benefit our results.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#118

So what's on the order side? What are you doing to grow the order book currently? Because you see that capacity, obviously, because it has [ breadth ] due to some capacity additions, but it's to be -- it's lower than we used to have [ 70% ] in 2018, '19.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#119

Because we've added a lot of capacity in the last 2 years, if you think about the sheet metal capacity as well as the new plastic factory that we added last year. As of now, like I said, quarter 2 is not going to be better than quarter 1, but we anticipate quarter 3 and 4 to be better than quarter 1.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#120

So do we hope to assume 70% utilization, which you used to have historically?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#121

We hope to end the year with that number.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#122

Secondly, on the Healthcare segment. So that's also a big drag on our segment because the capacity utilization on the Healthcare segment hasn't been as per you have set your targets. So what do you like to comment on that?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#123

No, I didn't say anything about capacity utilization on the Healthcare than what we have [indiscernible]. In fact capacity, yes, we don't report individual segment capacity, but utilization on the Healthcare segment has been very good.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#124

No. So I had joined the call -- previous con call also. So I mentioned the same question as regarding the Healthcare segment. So you mentioned that it was below our targets. So if [indiscernible] to us obviously because obviously 1 year prior. So that time I asked and that was your response. So that's why I'm asking.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#125

I think your question was to do with -- probably to do with [ CR ] closures and bottles.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#126

Yes.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#127

So yes, as part of -- and this has been mentioned on several calls, we do not actively market those products anymore. The same capacity is fully being utilized for manufacture of pen injectors and the other devices that we have.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#128

Okay. Got that. I missed on that point. Sure. Also, lastly, on -- would you like to provide a color on the U.K. subsidiary, which you had incorporated. So what's going on there? .

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#129

We have 3 active projects in the U.K. at the moment plus the fourth one that I spoke about briefly on this call where we've developed some new technology, which we will be taking forward now. So out of the 3 active projects currently ongoing in the U.K., we plan to commercialize 2 before the end of this financial year. Third one will go into production only next year. And the fourth one, the new technology is at least 24 months away from being a full product.

Operator

operator
#130

Next question is from the line of Aman Vij from Astute Investments.

Aman Vij

analyst
#131

So we have talked about Plastics business on the Furniture side. We -- becoming third largest this year in terms of supplier to our key customers. So are we on track on that? And if yes, is there opportunity in the next 3 to 5 years, we can even become second largest?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#132

I certainly think so. Whether we become third largest this year is a little unknown. We might end up at position four. But in the next 3 years, we certainly do see us shyly moving up in position.

Aman Vij

analyst
#133

Even second is possible, you are saying that?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#134

Yes.

Aman Vij

analyst
#135

On the Steel side, what we understand the -- I mean, the opportunity is even bigger than the Plastics. Also we had some [ flickering ] issues initially. So is that -- you have explained that 85% problem is solved, the remaining 15% odd especially on the inside. So in that reason, we are ramping up slower than the opportunity because even if, say, there is some recession then the [indiscernible] in Steel, but we are so smaller players. Shouldn't the ramp up be much faster? And any targets we have, like can we reach maybe top 5 or in the next 3, 5 years in Steel also? If you can talk about this thing.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#136

No, no. Top 5 in 3, 5 years is probably not possible because the -- in Steel, with the customer we're talking about, their typical suppliers are all the way from EUR 100 million to someone being as large as -- EUR 350 million. So that's not going to be possible in 3 years or even 5 years. We're looking at -- Steel as an opportunity is larger than Plastics within the customer. The customer is ready to give new business provided we were able to ramp up what we've currently taken on. So I think from an opportunity perspective, there's no lack of opportunity. We are working very closely with the customer, and they're also helping us in this ramp up and solving the issues that we have. So it's a very active dialogue. It's a very active business where they're also participating providing us with all the expertise they have. We're very, very hopeful and confident that this year we should be able to solve our -- basically our -- even issues or learning curve.

Aman Vij

analyst
#137

So you expect ramp happening or newer orders coming mostly next year and 3?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#138

Yes.

Sanjay Shah

executive
#139

Yes.

Aman Vij

analyst
#140

Sure, sir. Final question, you have talked about 4 projects in the U.K. subsidiary, 2 we are maybe commercializing this year, one next year and maybe the final one, which we have recently talked about in 2 years. The final one, the way you are lending, maybe our understanding was the, could guess is something related to the bag [ or the patches ]. But is the opportunity big enough in these products, the question was that because that -- maybe I'm wrong, but that technology has been in the last 3, 5 years, it hasn't scaled as much. So if you can talk about the same.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#141

Where those patches, as you call it, there's like on-body injectors and patch pumps are different. What you are referring to are meant for diabetes treatment, which have been on the market for quite some time. They're mostly -- they're pumped. What we are developing is a single-use on-body injector. So there is a difference, and there are meant for different therapies. Yes, you're right that the scale up hasn't happened because new molecules are going into such therapies for existing molecules, which are in IV form are going into such devices. We're also targeting a different type of customer for this new device. We're not necessarily targeting the generic pharma companies that we started with our pen injectors and auto injectors. With the wearable, we're also looking at a different kind of customer.

Operator

operator
#142

Next question is from the line of Dipesh from Investec.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#143

Two questions. One, given significant percentage of our incremental CapEx is going towards Healthcare. If I had to understand the payback for this, how should one look at the numbers?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#144

So Dipesh, feedback, I would say we would still look at somewhere between 4 to 5-year period for incremental investments, which we are making, this is keeping in fact that we have basically done [ reading ] investments for developments which have already been done, and we are now looking at ramping up on the product.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#145

Would it be possible for you to give more color on the CapEx, if you would like to split it between R&D efforts and infrastructure just to better understand the payback 5 years.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#146

So a large part of our CapEx is going to be in physical infrastructure and expansion of facilities and everything. R&D or the development would probably be a little over -- I don't have the numbers in front of me right now, but it'll probably be not more than about 10% to 15% of what we are investing overall.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#147

All right. So 80%, 85% is towards physical infra to my basic understanding. Correct me, if I am wrong. I think we have significant spare capacity to manage some of the insulin pen. So is there anything incremental that we are looking at? Is it towards inhaler worth Amit pointed or is there towards the [indiscernible]?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#148

No. Dipesh, we don't have capacity when it comes to pens. We don't -- I mean, we don't have significant capacity when it comes to pens. We'll manage whatever we currently are manufacturing and demand we have in the current facility. But the ramp-up that -- for which we have, of course, secured customers as well as the orders need to come from the new facility, new expansion.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#149

Okay. And do we have land and building already in [ paid ] for this? And so the incremental investment will be only to adjustment. Is that understanding right?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#150

No, no, we are adding -- we have land available, but we are adding 120,000, 125,000 square feet of building space to our existing Pharma facility. This is mainly being added for all the new projects, which we have talked about. We are looking at ramp up on these projects happening from this year onwards for the next 2 years, so essentially for that.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#151

Sure. That's helpful. My other question is for Amit. I'm just taking a step back. I'm just trying to connect the dots basically for full permission would indicate over [ INR 2 crores ] year-on-year basis, but it's not expected as we expected. Secondly, what we indicated will grow in next year. So if I have to leave between the lines, what we are seeing is probably will be flattish on a year-on-year basis that -- let's take some color over here. And Pharma, you indicated the pipeline is actually back-ended. And lastly, you indicated order book was lower than expected. How should we lead to those [ core ] data points? Are we facing hedges across business segments because of exposure to U.S.? I think one of the participants earlier went over with price is actually over advantage. So do you think that the segment should actually come to us and hit us where [indiscernible] actually goes down. How do you look at this?

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#152

Pharma business does not have really any headwinds. It's a very simple process. From the time our customers file to the time they can commercially launch is a 24-month process. So when it comes to pharma, I don't think there's any global scenario which is playing out, economic scenario is playing out against us. It really depends -- I mean portion of that, any time we do a new product in the pharma space, we have 50% of the response to the [indiscernible], customer also has 50% of the responsibility. So basically, cycle starts from the day 5. Some customers have been very good at hitting their targets in terms of filing. So some have had said back various reasons, some could be attributed to us sometimes or could be attributed to their own formulation or final assembly processes, et cetera. So there are various reasons for delays that happened. But right now, what we're seeing and the numbers you said for Pharma remain true because they are mostly for products which have been either filed or are on stability. On the non-pharma side, again, when we talk about a slowdown, we're not talking about a slowdown using the last financial year of the [ yardstick ]. We're talking about a [indiscernible] from the perspective of the capacity that we've created based on the orders that was awarded precisely. So we're not seeing volume up to that level. we've certainly seen growth from last year that you guys will see in the quarter 1 results. We're not seeing the volume that we had anticipated and built capacities for in quarter 2. We're hoping that ramp-up will happen in quarter 3 and 4.

Dipesh Sanghvi

analyst
#153

Sure. Okay. If I want to just rephrase it for me, Sanjay. If I have to look at the volume growth versus the revenue growth, Pharma and non-pharma, would it be the right way to look at it? And if something like size and home furnishing, there will still be a volume growth. Obviously, volume growth which has slowed up until the [ commenting ] down. What would be the right yardstick for us externally to actually look at the company?

Sanjay Shah

executive
#154

So Dipesh, even on the non-pharma part of the business, while they would have been very high, we're looking at very high volume growth, we were also looking at improvements at an ROCE levels. This was basically keeping in mind higher than normal assessments, which would have gone on that business. Unfortunately, because of what's happening globally in [indiscernible]. I hope things get corrected. I do not know whether it's 3 months, 6 months, 9 months. That's what it is. While pharma, as you rightly said, yes, it's value group, where you need to make investments upfront, which we have done in the past. And now we are now [indiscernible], which you're not making but will help us scale up that in the coming years.

Operator

operator
#155

I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.

Amit Sanghvi

executive
#156

Thank you very much. Thanks, everyone, for joining the call. We hope that we've been able to answer your questions adequately. For any further information, I request you to get in touch with SGA, our Investor Relations advisers. Thanks again, and have a great day.

Sanjay Shah

executive
#157

Thank you. Thank you, everyone.

Operator

operator
#158

Thank you very much. On behalf of Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited transcript — plus 250,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited earnings transcripts and 250,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.