Societatea Energetica Electrica S.A. (EL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
March 11, 2024
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. The Electrica teleconference is starting now. Thank you.
Raluca Kasap
executiveHello I'm Raluca Kasap, Head of Investor Relations and together with the entire Electrica management team, I'd like to thank you for joining the teleconference call and live webcast to present and discuss the 2023 financial results, which were published last week as submitted for the approval of the OGMS that will take place on the 25th of April. Those of you who are connected only by phone, please download the presentation in PDF format available on our website under Results and Presentation section. The participants connected online can address written questions on the live webcast or can intervene live on the Q&A session. Kindly note that since the entire conference is being recorded, all participants will be in a listen-only mode, [Operator Instructions] The recorded presentation will be available on our website starting latest tomorrow and the transcript as well in Romanian and English as soon as possible. We kindly ask you to see the disclaimer on Slide 3 of the presentation. Now we'll begin the presentation of the financial results, followed by questions-and-answers session at the end. Should you wish you can ask questions during the teleconference, you can also send them by e-mail at [email protected], and we will answer at the end. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Alexandru Chirita, our CEO. Thank you.
Chirita Alexandru-Aurelian
executiveThank you, Raluca. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. As always, I am happy to welcome you all today. This year, Electrica will celebrate 10 years since the admission to trading on the Bucharest Stock Exchange and my team and I dedicate this moment to all our stakeholders. 2023 was a complex year that bought once again many challenges, and I feel privileged to be backed up by such a reliable and experienced team throughout the group. The Electrica group has maintained a positive trend in its financial performance in 2023 with an increase in EBITDA of over 27% and an 11% higher net profit compared to the previous year, mainly driven by the operational performance in the distribution segment. It's all due to the [ team work ] and I thank all my colleagues in the group for data sustained efforts. In the distribution segment, over 100% of the investment plan to be put into function were done. Regarding the investments, they are also supported by the attraction of non-reimbursable funds. There has already attracted EUR 0.25 billion from the modernization fund in 13 projects, approximately 42% of the total financing already signed on the Modernization Fund and has another 17 projects submitted for approval. All these projects are aimed to maximize the performance of the managed infrastructure and to accelerate the digital transformation of the business. Last year also brought us other important events such as the acceleration in the renewable energy production segment and the launch of the corporate strategy for 2024, 2030. At the end of the year, the merger through which Electrica absorbed 3 of its production subsidiaries was finalized and in the near future, we plan to merge 1 more for the production subsidiary. We hope to put into function 2 parks this year of 39 megawatts and to start the construction for 2 others of approximately 133 megawatts. All these projects are crucial to achieving our ambitious target of 1 gigabyte by 2030. As always, we will keep you posted and share more concrete details as soon as we can. In December 2023, the corporate strategy of the Electrica Group for the period to 2024, 2030 was also approved and published to which investment diversification of renewable energy sources, diversification of services, digitalization and large-scale implementation of ESG principles represent the main strategic objectives. By adopting the new strategic direction, aligned with those at the national and European level, we will play an important role in the energy transaction and contribute to achieving the objectives of sustainability, efficiency and innovation in the sector. At the same time, we aim to ensure solid prospects for the development of the companies in the group and meet both the needs of our customers and the expectations of our investors and shareholders. Regarding the distribution of dividends, we choose to be cautious this year as well, as we announced in previous conferences, remain focused on investments, both in the distribution and in the production segment. Another success is the entry of Electrica shares in the FTSE Russell Indices series, which is a confirmation of the improvement of liquidity. The good results and the successful implementation of the investment strategy was held in the appreciation of Electrica shares up to level almost doubled since 2 years ago when I took over the CEO mandate. I now hand over to Stefan, our CFO, to provide you with a detailed breakdown of our financial results.
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveThank you, Alexandru. I would just let go directly to Slide 12, I think, where we start the summary of the results. In an nutshell, these results of this year are boosted and are favored by the evolution of energy prices and the fact that the prices of acquisition of energy were contained and were significantly lower, plus there is also a strong effect related to the fact that various elements of expenses were kept under control. The only major element of expenses, which were significantly higher the financing costs because we continue to prefinance the subsidies from the [ support scheme ] and the difference for network losses for the [ ex-enterprise ] and the actual and also, there are some costs related to the increases of personnel costs because aligned with the inflation, we are also adjusting the salaries for our employees. If you look at the summary. In terms of revenue, there is a slight decrease of the revenues, but under the context that both the quantities supplied and distributed decreased slightly, and it is also a decrease of the average prices. If you look at the EBITDA results, we have a 25% increase in the EBITDA with a strong fourth quarter. So the EBITDA margin reaches 18%, both yearly and in the fourth quarter. Also in terms of net results, the result is higher than last year and also with a strong net result in quarter 4. The fourth slide, the fourth element relates to the increase of the net debt, which is still reflecting both the fact that we refinanced the support scheme. We continue to prefinance the support scheme, we started to recuperate the difference of prices for network losses, the value from 2022. But still, there is a significant portion of loans which are allocated to this. It's also to be put into consideration also with the efforts that we are starting to do for developing the generation of energy. If we go at the detailed slides, if you look at the consolidated EBITDA and net result evolution, starting from EBITDA of last year, we have a positive effect coming from the increase of the energy margin, which is mostly related to the fact that we have decreased the costs with purchased energy to cover network losses. Because of overall acquisition prices decreased in the distribution due to the effect of the MACEE mechanism, but the MACEE mechanism also helped in terms of the cost of energy for the supply business. And then we also had an impact of increase of revenues in distribution, which related both to the increase of tariffs related to operating the difference of price from network losses from 2022. And also, we had here a positive fact related to the increase of the quantities of reactive energy and higher than initially estimated tariffs for this energy, which also had an important effect. In terms of the other elements, you can see the capitalized network losses. We have a positive effect of RON 971 million. So basically, the amount which was capitalized for this year was very, very little, RON 19 million, because we had a sharp decrease on average of 48% of the electricity cost. And due to this effect, the effective price of the acquisition of energy for distribution was very close to the Exante price, which was given by the regulator. We have also a negative variation of OpEx of RON 190 million. I will mention you that we kept some costs in control, other categories of cost, but here, we see the effect of the financing costs. And then of the -- okay, financing costs, you don't see it here in EBITDA, I will mention later. The increase of the personnel cost and then we have also an increase of operating expenses in the Supply segment, which is related to ITC services. We made some efforts related to the system to a bit of the system and so on. Variation of the profit compared to last year is profit higher with RON 62 million, which is mainly due to the effect of the EBITDA increase of RON 370 million. And then this is mostly offset by the increase of the financial costs with RON 129 million. And then we have also an effect -- a negative effect of the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets of RON 118 million. But out of this, RON 162 million the amortization related to the network losses. Going to the next slide, we have the highlights on the distribution segment, where you can see also detailed EBITDA analysis for this segment compared with the elements mentioned to the -- on the previous slide, I will also add that the result of the distribution had 2 offsetting effects, 1 positive effect, [ interim ] provision of RON 23 million, but also some unfavorable effect of RON 28 million, which is related to adjustment of depreciation of receivables, mainly as a result of some legislations -- legislations of provisions for litigation. In terms of net results, the net result increased by RON 178 million, mainly from the evolution of EBITDA, which increased by RON 437 million. And then this is -- then affected by the unfavorable results related to financial cost increase of RON 57 million. Mentioning distribution, we should add that there is an increase in net debt by RON 138 million (sic) [ RON 134 million ]compared with last year, which was mostly related to increase of loans for financing the construction of electrical networks, long-term loans of RON 240 million and some other site variations on other elements of the debt and cash. Going to the next slide. This is a summary of the Distribution segment results in more detail. There is also the net debt that I mentioned in the previous slide. You can also see that in this distributed energy margin, we have this year a significant positive result compared with the previous 2 years. And then there is also the detail that we generally mentioned related to the correction with which we started this regulatory period. Moving to the next slide. We have our already traditional slides where we start from the regulated asset base and we go to the regulated profit and then further on -- down until the IFRS result. IFRS 2844, yes, OMFP 2844. So starting for the 2023 we have the correction that we mentioned, we started the regulatory period. Then we have the differences related to the fact that the rate changed to the regulatory period from 6.9% then to 5.66% and then finally, 6.39%. You see an impact of RON 215 million in network losses excess just to put it in perspective, this is a good performance to saving Basically, we were given by the regulator in the RON 305 million revenues corrections and a higher price estimated for the network losses and we achieved a much better price. So this is why we made a saving basically of RON 215 million. So we remain with the difference of correction, RON 305 million minus RON 215 million. Then you have -- starting from the regulated profit. Moving to the next slide. RON 834 million, you'll find this also in this slide and going further because here, we are showing the analysis starting from net revenue, total net revenue and then going to the regulated results. It's another type of evolution of split. And then going from this down with putting into emphasis, the difference between accounting or regulating distribution. And then to the operating results, and then going down to the statutory results under OMFP RON 182 million of RON 538 million. And then from here with the adjustments from OMFP RON 182 million to the localized IFRS OMFP [indiscernible] with a net result of RON 486 million. Going then to the next slide. These are the usual slides related to the performance of the operating areas under there. I should point out that in terms of network losses, we are within the percentages introduced by ANRE with the exception only of 1 area, which is Muntenia Nord, if we go there, there is a slight excess there. But that's more related to the fact that, as previously mentioned, the way of estimating the distributed amount changed and we have introduced according to the legislation, the consumption conventions which were based on previous estimations and in many cases, there were no reading of the meter spec then. Now this starts to correct and adjust and this is an ongoing process. So for next year, all the conversion will be based on more accurate data of historic readings. Going then to the next slide. In terms of financial impact of the electricity market, there is -- besides the detail related to the network losses that I covered before. we should mention that the distribution energy decreased with 3.8% compared with the previous year, you will see also in the decrease in the supply area. This is aligned somehow with the general decrease of consumption generally of energy, which is caused by consumers energy efficiency efforts at the level of consumers, et era. In terms of investments, we have made 102% of the CapEx plan for 2023, which included also RON 135 million representing recoveries related to the year 2022, had a delay, as you remember, due to the pressure on the financing of network losses. Also, we should mention that we have also additional costs, additional works of RON 522 million in this CapEx plan compared with the 2023 plan, which are resulting from the legislative changes related to the connection. If we move further to supply business in the Supply segment, we had an EBITDA decreasing by RON 85 million, which is mainly resulting from the decrease in the revenues from the supply of natural gas by RON 906 million, which is mainly a result of the decrease in volumes of energy by 9%, as previously mentioned. Then we had a positive effect, which is generated by several elements. One is the increase of the subsidies to be received under the mechanism of protecting the end consumers, the support scheme. We have also purchased energy costs decreased by RON 120 million, which is determined by the positive effect of unrecognized capping components according to the low [ 3.67% ] of 2022 of acquisition costs. Basically, we should mention here that it's about the fact that for some quantities from some periods, we budgeted acquisition costs, which were above the ceiling. And we managed to have a better performance than we had all the cost of acquisition under the ceiling during the entire period, and this has created this effect. The net profit is also affected besides the evolution of EBITDA by the effect of the financial results, which in the cost -- the financial cost increased to RON 97 million, due to the fact that we were in the station to continue to finance the support team, as you can see also in the net debt position. Net debt increased by RON 443 million compared with previous year, which is mainly as a result of this, including the drawn amounts for refinancing the support. Moving to the next slide. Here, we have the competitive market share and total market share for November 2023, and you have the position of Electrica Furnizare in the market, then going to -- by number of consumption places, we are still the leader. Here you have the key operational indicators. You can see the split of consumption places, which is relatively stable, then you can see the evolution of electricity supplied on the main retail market. It's -- as you can see, there is, let's say, a decrease to be put also to be justified by the decreasing of the consumption. Of course, there are also some new suppliers which are growing on the market. But from our point of view, we consider that the level of 8 together is the level at which we are comfortably operating. Then going to the next slide. You have the details about splits of electricity volumes to markets and then electricity revenues market and also details about consumption places. Going to the next slide. Here are details relating to -- related to the change of legislation, how this was implemented, but also related at the end of the slides to the impact of the acquisition of energy because much also helped the acquisition of Energy for the supply business, although there is a priority for the TSO and DSO, then the supply companies are benefiting for these amounts, both at the yearly allocation and then at the monthly allocations. And these combined also with the efforts of our team, increasing knowledge and efforts to purchase energy at best prices possible. You can see on the left evolution of the average price on the head market, where the blue line is this year. You can see that we are in a more stable format and with a decreasing trend. And then also including on the balancing market where the prices were still in a totally different all year than next year than previous year. Going to the next slide, in terms of receivables analysis, in terms of what we collect from the customer we are still very happy with the evolution. We don't see any issue regarding the timely collection of the receivables from the customers. As you see in terms of adjusting this level of outstanding receivables with the turnover, the level is decreasing. It should be mentioned that some delays in terms of the IFRS 9 we're still generating as in the sense that in some cases, we delayed invoicing due to changes in the algorithm or changes in our system. So this somehow impacts artificially the calculation of the IFRS 9. It should be mentioned that with the introduction of Ordinance ANRE 5/2023, which allows for installing -- providing installments for the customers which were invoiced with delays. We don't have necessarily that significant amounts, but there is an increase from RON 12 million to RON 52 million at the end of the year in terms of receivables, which are put into installment of course, compared with the total amount of receivables, it's not material. Going to the next slide. It's Electrica SERV benefited of an increase of revenues by RON 24 million, because there is this increasing trend of demand for solar and photovoltaic systems, which generated new contracts, but then there is also sometimes a delay between when you purchase some stocks and you incur some expenses related to these projects, which have a long, let's say, cycle and there a lot of projects to be commissioned in the future. Going to the next slide. This is the summary related to the production segment. We had a decrease on the revenues for the production because for the Stanesti Park, we had, of course, decreased revenues along with the decreased prices of energy in the market. The park is providing the energy on the day ahead market and there is, of course, the evolution related to that. Then you have also the structure of the production segment with the various at the end of the year with the various companies out of which that we merged Electrica Productie Energie, Electrica Energie Verde. So these are introduced in the financials for this year. Going to the next slide. This is the group liquidity position as we used to post it after pandemics and then with the evolution of the support scheme and we need to finance a lot the receivables to be recuperated on the support scheme As you can see the position at the end of the year is relatively similar with the one at the end of 2022. Going to the next slide. It's the element related to the dividend, which was covered by my colleague and then you have than access. I would say we are welcoming your questions from now.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Andrei Ioana with Alpha Bank Romania.
Ioana Andrei
analystI have just 1 question regarding the budget proposal. You've proposed on the stand-alone budget, dividend income of only RON 60 million, if I'm not mistaken. Can you explain a little bit why you don't expect to distribute this year net profit from -- on a stand-alone basis?
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveYou're referring to the distribution proposed by dividends. I think it's RON 40 million, at [ 0.11780 ], if i'm correct. And this is, as mentioned also by my colleague, this is related to the fact that -- on 1 side, we still have RON 2 billion to be recuperated from the Romanian state and the supply scheme. Yes you're are thinking about budget, okay. Yes, in the budget.
Ioana Andrei
analystNo, I'm thinking about the budget in the next year dividend. Because we should have seen in the budget proposal for Electrica stand-alone already dividend income significantly higher.
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveNo, but we are not mentioning here the proposal of dividends in the budget. The proposal of dividends will be at the end of the year after we see the results. And then when we have the actual next year, we'll make a proposal of the -- for the dividends to be distributed. Now if you look at this profit for the year, you should also take into consideration where we are developing the production. So we are keen on also supporting this development and growing of the business, the dividend at the end of 2024 also in terms of the subsidiary, if you look at distribution subsidiary, of course, we could take a look at the distribution of dividends from them, but you should first consider that there is a lag. So basically, the profit, which is done by the operating subsidiaries in, let's say, year and -- it is to be constituting dividend distributed to Electrica in year and plus 1. And then it reflecting the profits of Electrica in the plus 1, which are pay the dividend in plus 2. So there is always this delay. This is 1 thing. The other thing is you should consider that the distribution subsidiary, okay, beside okay? They are doing a profit, significant profit, but they should also keep investing similar amounts with the 1 which we invested in the last couple of years until 2030. I mean, if you look at the entire the entire plan of transforming the energy sector in Europe. Europe, this is based on the transformation of TSO and DSO. And from this point of view, we need to continue the investment. This will not mean that we will not have this dividend distributed from the distribution subsidiaries to Electrica and to the customers. But we had some situation in the past, we're investing more than 100% of the amortization and then distributing all the profit up. This is not sustainable on a long run for such a long tenor. And then, yes, for the other companies, we would we would take a look at dividends considering the case. But after we recuperate the losses from the past, now from the supply after this year, we'll be covering the loss from 2021. I will just point out that if you look at the history of our results, you could see that 2021 was really a one-off. And after that, we kept on posting 2022 and also the 2023 solid results. But we will need to mix to balance it with the requirement to grow the business, both investment in the distribution subsidiaries and investments for developing the production and the production capacity, the production subsidiary or sector segment. Right now, yes.
Ioana Andrei
analystBut my question is in the budget proposal, the -- for Electrica stand-alone, right, there. The proposed -- projected income from dividend is what you're expecting to distribute this year? It reflects what you're expecting to distribute this year?
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveSo you're referring to the -- you are referring to the RON 60 million that is stipulated dividend to be record.
Ioana Andrei
analystYes.
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveSo this is the case. For the supply -- we are just covering the loss from the past, and we'll be able to consider dividends in the future. And for the distribution subsidiary right now, we consider this amount because as we said, we are taking a look also at the future plans for CapEx in the distribution subsidiaries, which are quite substantial. Now going in the time for the next year, we will, of course, evaluated at each point. But right now, this is the amount which is budgeted, yes.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions]
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveOkay. So looking at the questions that we received from one of the analysts. I think we can ask along -- answer along the -- so in terms of asset base, I will pick them -- I will pick them depending on how to answer. So are you looking to revalue the asset base? When would that happen? I don't see a revaluation in the consolidatory statement. You should see Note 23 of fixed assets, all the fixed assets are revalued at the end of 31st December 2023, as we also discussed in the past, you should note that as per the IFRS adjustments, in case of -- case of the assets, which are in the regulated asset base for which we are adjusting down, we are taking down the revaluation result. For there, you'll see in the financials, the results without the impact of the valuation because we are the IFRS standards. But if you look at not 2023, we revalued the assets along with the discussions that we have and thinking at the other element of -- I mean what's behind your question, yes, we revalue the assets for distribution, which will be shown in the statutory stand-alone on the distribution in order to be sure that at the end of the regulatory period, we have room to get the difference of inflation in the ramp. Going to the next question.
Chirita Alexandru-Aurelian
executiveI'll pick up 2 questions. What you expect regarding the compensation due from the state and the net debt position. So we have a positive view on 2024 in -- regarding the compensation due to the state -- we hope end of the year, the situation will be much positive in recuperating these amounts. And we will see the net debt decrease with at certain points, I think we will have a payment in June and most likely in September and on the following months or in between, we'll see some smaller payments. We are not -- we don't have the same pressure that we did last year. So now due to the decrease of energy cost this amount will decrease.
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveThe assumptions regarding the debt position, leading to the evolution of the financial expenses that we see in the budget. What is quite important for us is to keep the level of indebtedness at the usual ratio, yes, net debt to EBITDA maximum 3, okay, temporarily, maybe 3.5%, if we have a significant M&A ongoing, but we are very keen on maintaining this level at the level which is accepted by all the financial year is also the most let's say, conservative. And also, it is very important to be aligned with the criteria of Fitch for investment grade. So what we see as the evolution of the debt during the year is that at the end of the year, will be still under 3x then debt per EBITDA. The financial expenses would benefit -- okay, would evolve, let's say, in a path in which there will be more significant in the first part of the year, but then towards the end of the year, along with the payments and so on, this should decrease. And also, we are counting on a slight decrease on the financing costs. But in terms of the position, it should be mentioned that all the efforts related to development of production should be made only when we are able to decrease the debt, which is related to the refinancing of the support scheme. So as this is decreasing, we should focus them and redirect them towards related to development of production. But in any case, being below 3x net debt per EBITDA. What do you plan to do with the funds from the bond issuance, the amount seems successive for the current pipeline of renewable capacities. I will not necessarily comment -- I mean there are details in the notes that in the material for the GMS that this is related to mostly generation development of generation. This is an approval in principle. So when you compare this for the pipeline, you should also consider that it's an approval in principle, which is covering 2 years. Total level of correction net that would affect in the 2023, Jana, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that this negative correction from 2023 will be reflected in 2025 and b, it will be, in particular, related to this reactive energy revenue. Where do you see the cost per megawatt for new capacities? as I understand from my colleagues, which are covering this business. It's clear from -- at this moment that the cost per megawatt is decreasing. But we can't make right now assumption about market costs because the cost per megawatt also depends on the chosen technology. And it depends on one capacity to the other. What we could assure you is that we are caring for each project, competitive procedures. I think 1 of the projects we had like 16 offers or something, and we streamline this process. So for each investment, we'll be focusing on securing the best price quality ratio. Then you should also take into consideration that now there starts to be screening also from the financials regarding suppliers because if you are speaking about suppliers from China or something, there are suppliers. So this will also impact somehow the evolution of the prices. As you look at the value, I answered this. What's the expected return on investment for the production assets. It should be between 9% and 11% of course, it depends from one project to the other. What you should note is that for us, these projects are not necessarily only considered under this return of investments. But for us, it's important to have a capacity of production, which to match somehow at least part of the supply and energy. So that we are securing the position of the group in terms of consolidated results. I mean you should have had some production in the end of 2021, the result would have been positive in the back.
Operator
operatorManagement are done with the webcast questions. [Operator Instructions] We have an audio question from an audio participant, Mr. Ciopraga Iuliana with Wood & Company.
Iuliana Ciopraga
analystJust very briefly on readjust base, you see the evaluation, but I see the net value of asset somewhere around RON 6.2 billion. So it's quite far from the RON 7.25 billion. So that's why I was asking if this would be enough for the year for the regulator to recognize the adjustment with inflation. But also on the financial expenses, I mean, in the budget, we don't see any decrease in financial expenses. And that's why I was asking basically why you see them rising in the in the income statement, although I hear that you basically expect net debt to come down. So just a bit of clarity here. Are you being cautious on the financial expenses? Or is there something else and regarding corrections, 1 last point regarding correction that you mentioned. So basically, what you're saying that -- can you detail a bit exactly what corrections we should be expecting regarding in 2025 net corrections, of course, you mentioned reactive energy. But just yes, something about the size would be there to be helpful.
Stefan-Alexandru Frangulea
executiveSo the negative corrections are published in the report of administrators. It's RON 150 million around and there is also other details about them. In terms of fixed assets, I know you're the RON 7.2 billion, which you are comparing. We can have a discussion detail, and we can provide you when we are having the financial stand-alone. On the IFRS, you don't see the revaluation. I mean this is the principle that IFRS for the RAB for the bar assets. We are not showing in the IFRS consolidated revaluation. We are just showing the addition of the CapEx over the -- during the year, but it's not shown there. Jane, if you could.
Jana Dingo
executiveThe RON 7.2 billion that you are mentioning is related to the calculation, which was done by ANRE based on 13-point-something inflation. But you don't see it in the IFRS because the revaluation is not shown on IFRS based on the rules. We can discuss this in more detail, as always, as you know, in terms of financial costs, yes, it's true. I mean the idea is this is supposed to increase during the year and decrease back towards the end of the year. In the first part of the year, there is increasing costs yes. So at the end of the year, we factor in some decrease of the interest, but it's conservative, let's say. So we should prefer to take a look at this point of view, in a more conservative way. I don't know what other questions. This is what I remember, the revaluation of RAB, the financing costs, what else Iuliana. I missed something?
Iuliana Ciopraga
analystNo, that's all that I wanted to know. Thank you so much.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the conference over to management for any closing comments. Thank you.
Chirita Alexandru-Aurelian
executiveAs always, if you have any more questions along the line, we are here to help in any way possible. We try to be as transparent as we can regarding the projects. As soon as we have news, we will publish them, and we'll announce everybody on our progress. Thank you so much.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, the conference has now concluded, and you may disconnect your telephone. Thank you for calling, and have a good afternoon.
This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Societatea Energetica Electrica S.A. earnings transcripts and 32,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.