Sogefi S.p.A. (SGF) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
October 23, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood afternoon. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome and thank you for joining the Sogefi 9 Months 2023 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Frédéric Sipahi, CEO of Sogefi. Please go ahead, sir.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThank you, madam. Hello, and thank you for joining this call. I'd like to start with a quick summary of the third quarter and the year-to-date results. It has clearly been a quite good quarter from activity and volume point of view. The automotive market performed quite well, even it's still below levels of '19 in Europe. As you have seen in our presentation, we had a strong growth in all regions and business lines to reach roughly 10% growth in year to date. We also have been able to improve our margins despite energy prices and inflationary tensions on some commodity. We upscaled on our fixed cost again. And at the end, EBIT is improving both in absolute value and percentage in all business lines. During this quarter, we also worked on the strategical part of the business. As you may have seen in our presentation, we are working on Mexico suspension on a deal in order to sell the assets and exit from the geographical area for suspension as we were losing money and consuming cash for the last 6 years in this part of the world. So I propose we move to question and answers so we can answer to all your questions. Thank you.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Monica Bosio with Intesa Sanpaolo.
Monica Bosio
analystThe first one is on the guidance. If I read well, the company has improved the top line guidance, and this is fine. But I cannot understand very well the guidance at the margin or at the EBIT in absolute term level. When do you refer to the guidance at the EBIT level? Are you expecting an improvement in absolute term, in line with the one that the company delivered over the 9 months? Or are you expecting an improvement in percentage term in operating profitability in line with the one that we have seen in the 9 months results? This is for the first question. The second one is on the restructuring costs. Can you just give us a rough indication of the restructuring costs that you are planning for 2023? The third question is on the suspensions business. After Mexico, are you planning further restructuring? Or do you think that the manufacturing footprint is now fine? And the very last is on Romania. What should we expect for the plant in Romania going forward in terms of margins and EBIT?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThank you, Monica. I think you have asked a lot of complete questions. So thank you very much. So the first one is very important, it's the guidance on EBIT. To make it clear, our guidance is to say that we improve the current EBIT year-to-date, 9 months, by 1.6% last year and that we will do the same in the last 3 months. Or to say it in a more easy way, last year, we were full year at 4.9% or 5% EBIT adjusted. And this year, we should finish between 6.5% and 7%, let's say, EBIT adjusted for full year 2023. And basically, of an improved turnover, as you mentioned. So de facto, it means that the EBITDA adjusted will be 3 figures compared to EUR 76 million last year. There will be 3 digits, basically, so -- which is a good news and a good signal. I don't know if I am clear. If not, Monica, do not hesitate.
Monica Bosio
analystYes.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThis is for the first question on the guidance. For the restructuring full year, we will be close to EUR 8 million, if I remember well, yes, EUR 8 million. Mexico, I think you had a question on Mexico. Right, Mexico suspension has been let's say, a cash consumer for the last at least 5 years, as I remember. It was a small -- it is a small facility, between EUR 12 million or EUR 15 million, depending the projections for next year, EUR 10 million for this year. So in order to focus to our European, Indian and Chinese and [ Marckolsheim ] activities and exit a loss-making activity, we are working, as I wrote, on a deal, which I have to admit is very close to be done, in order to exit from this market. But in case we will need with our customers to be able to still propose manufacturing when it's about business with Europe, North America and China, sometimes it happens, to be able to propose that to our customers, thanks to a manufacturing agreement we will have with the buyer of the assets. So that, in theory, we should be able to sign by -- we will be able to sign by this year. And for us, of course, it will be a good news for cash consumption for next year. And de facto for this year, the IFRS 5 rules have been applied, so it explains the restatement of our figures for 2022.
Monica Bosio
analystOkay. But do we plan future further restructuring in the suspensions business? Or do you think that now...
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThis was your fourth question. Yes, Monica, it's a fair question. I would say that out of Europe, it's okay. We have a facility here in India, in Pune, which is doing very well. In China, I'm also very happy because the turnaround has been done and we are back to the black in China and we are generating cash. In Europe, it's still the part of the world where we do have many facilities. The volumes for next year may be challenging. It's a bit early to say about that. So we have not done yet the budget and the strategic plan. But for sure, we will have some efforts to do next year and the years after in Europe in order to continue to improve the efficiency of our footprint and to have a better load of our factories. Because suspension, it's all about loading of your factory. We know it, when the factory is well-managed and with a load above 70%, you do money. Below, even very, very well managed, it's very difficult to earn a life. So it will depend, the volume of '24. But for sure, we will need to continue our efforts of improving the fixed costs and the footprint of suspension.
Monica Bosio
analystOkay. And the last one...
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveSo Romania, it's always to say -- it's difficult to say, it's totally finished, it's done, and we have done the turnaround. Nevertheless, in the first 9 months, we are able to see some positive signs in the profitability, but also from an operational point of view, we have been able to work with our teams and our customers in order to improve the quality level. We have also improved a lot, the turnover of our teams. And now we are working on the cost structure of the factory and also with our customers to improve the margin. So it has been as forecasted in the plan, and the profitability this year will improve compared to last year. And I'm quite optimistic that, for next year, with our industrial plan of improving both efficiency and complexity of the facility, we will be able to stabilize the situation in Romania.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Martino De Ambroggi with Equita.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystHello, can you hear me?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveYes, it's okay.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystSorry. I had a problem with the micro. And my first question is on still on Mexico. Just to understand the pro forma figure, including Mexico for third quarter alone, or in terms of EBITDA? Because I saw suspensions were up in terms of profitability at 10.6% in terms of EBITDA margin. So just to understand, what was the negative contribution, if negative, of Mexico? And I suppose, still on Mexico, the cash in is small, but maybe not. I understand the negotiation is not closed so you cannot disclose the precise figure, but just to have an idea. And on Q4, what is the assumption for the strike in the U.S.? So what is the impact as of today? And what should happen in order not to match the guidance you provided for the full year? And last on '24, I know you have not prepared the budget yet. But considering IHS guiding for plus 1% or in that region, considering Romania, that if I remember correctly, should have lost EUR 4 million in '23. And if I understand correctly, your previous answer is breakeven in '24. So just to understand, apart from Romania, is there any other significant improvement to be expected in profitability in '24 if IHS is right?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThank you. So for Mexico, the first question was about the impact on the Slide 11 on the global impact...
Martino De Ambroggi
analystNo. What could have been the profitability of suspensions in Q3, which, based on my calculation, is double-digit including Mexico. So I suppose Mexico was probably loss-making, I don't know.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveSuspension Mexico was minus EUR 5 million. So we should delete EUR 5 million from the figures of suspension total.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystOkay. In Q3 alone?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveNo, full year.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystFull year. But in Q3, if possible?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveEUR 2 million.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystEUR 2 million, okay.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveSo this answer to your question about Mexico. The cash, yes, I cannot disclose the amount. I would say that if we are able to close the deal, the big impact will be more on the noncash consumption next year rather than the cash in, even if I consider the cash in non-negligible. But yes, you are right. It's not a big amount that will change totally the cash generation for the year. So it's more about the stoppage of the cash burn in Mexico, which was quite big. The cash consumption this year was close to double digits, and last year, too, because of the working capital and the fact that we had to import the steel from Europe. Is it okay, about Mexico?
Martino De Ambroggi
analystYes, perfect.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveUSA. For now, we have been very lucky. Remember, most of our footprint is in Canada and Mexico. And we are delivering also customers in Mexico and Canada. So for this part, we have not been impacted. We have a factory in West Virginia which is half OES, half OEM. For the OES part, no impact. OEM is, year-to-date September, no impact. Basically, we start to feel the impact on the USA factory. So the assumption I had on the guidance that I gave is that the strike would stop by the end of October. If the strike do not end by the end of October, then we may be impacted, depending on which facility of our customers will stop. So it's almost impossible to predict if it will continue and if the -- which factory they will stop. But right now, I consider zero impact until the end of October because our inventory is -- because the fact that we are delivering more engine factories than final assembly plant. So if the strike finished before the end of October, we will have no impact. After, we need to see it case by case. Nevertheless, I would say that we may have some buffer of safety on the other side of -- in Europe and China in our guidance to may be able to absorb a part of it. So we have to wait to see for no zero impact. Let's hope that it will finish by the end of October. If not, we are ready, as you know, to take all measures in order to reduce our cost waiting for this strike to be finished. And for '24, yes, we've got the improvement of Romania. The market, for now, it's a bit too early to know where it will go. But we will also have the full year impact of the closure of U.K. that we closed this year, end of summer. So next year, we will have the full year benefit of this action.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystAm I right in remembering EUR 2 million from the U.K. closure?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveYes, absolutely. Yes, absolutely.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystThis is that for '24 full year basis?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveYes. And basically, we will have roughly this 9-month impact next year. So close to EUR 2 million. Yes.
Martino De Ambroggi
analystOkay. And Romania, from minus EUR 4 million to 0, more or less?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveNo, I never said it will be 0. I said we are going -- good track for the improvement. This year, we have already done strong improvement. For sure, we need to shoot for the breakeven. So it may be the target that I will decide for '24. We had some very good news about the energy prices. We are continuing to work also with our customer and industrial action. So to shoot for 0 may be my ambition when I will build the budget. A bit too early to give an accurate number as the budget is not build and validated by my Board. But we can discuss that in the next meeting. But I think we will go on the right way.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Gabriele Gambarova with Banca Akros.
Gabriele Gambarova
analystThe first is on the contribution margin, 30% in the quarter. I was wondering if you could detail, let's say, the moving parts of this improvement. And if we can, let's say, assume something similar even for the next year for what you see? The second one is on the free cash flow, EUR 53 million in the first 9 months. Was wondering if you can, here, comment the outlook for the whole year. Considering that the previous, let's say, indication was around EUR 45 million if I remember well. And then last one on the tax rate, 25% in the first -- sorry, I think it was in the -- in Q3 maybe, even here -- no, sorry, in the first 9 months, 25%. So I was wondering if you could give an indication for the whole year and possibly for the following years.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveSo for the PBFE yes, we had the quarter at 30%, for last year at 27%, so a 3% jump. And year-to-date is at 29%. Of course, we will fight to, I would say, in a recurring way. But now this quarter, we have also been able to have good discussion with our customers, where there has been some one-off impact. So I would say that we thought this one-off impact with 30% would be rather 29%. So there are -- there is 1% that I would qualify nonrecurring for next quarter, which doesn't mean that we may -- maybe we will be able to find another 1% to compensate that. So just from a mathematical point of view, the quarter has been helped by retroactive discussion and negotiations with our customer that represents roughly 1% of improvement. Even without that, our PBFE would be at 29% versus 27%, which is still a good improvement. For next year, it's a bit too early. We need to check what's going to happen with the energy prices, and then from an indirect point of view, the material prices and what I will decide about the pricing with our customers. But for sure, we will need to keep our strong discipline on the pricing in order to continue in the improvement of financial results. So for sure, it will be one of the main target of '24, to be able to stabilize our PBFE at a high normalized level, which is close to 29%. For the free cash flow, if I had to give a recommendation by today, I would say that it will be at last -- at least, sorry, last year level. At least. We're both taking in consideration the positive one-off potential impact of Mexico, at least last year. Concerning tax rate, I will let the expert, Beatrice de Minicis, answer to your question.
Maria Beatrice de Minicis
executiveSo the tax rate, I can say that for the fourth quarter, we expect a tax rate around 25% [ to 50% ]. So more or less in line over the first 9 months and maybe in that area. For the '24, it is too early to make a prediction. So we will see after the preparation of the budget for this tax.
Gabriele Gambarova
analystOkay. So just, if possible, follow up on this. I mean, clearly, you are going to close 2023 with a 25%, which is much lower than my assumptions, 10 percentage points. If I assume a 30% tax rate, I'm totally wrong? I mean, with more realistic than 35% as I have.
Maria Beatrice de Minicis
executiveYes, 45% for the full year is a bit high considering that, in 9 months, we have a tax rate of 55%. So I would say for the fourth quarter, from 25% to 50%. So around full year, it could be 35%, 27%, around...
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveYes, it's 27%. It will be rather -- between 25% and 27%.
Gabriele Gambarova
analystOkay, for 2023. And 2024, is it possible to make an assessment, I mean...
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveWe cannot assess the tax you would pay without knowing how much money you will do. So first, I need to see where we go from a profitability point of view, and then we will assess the tax. I don't see any potential big reasons that our tax rate structure will change dramatically. Nevertheless, to be able to answer you in a proper way, we will need first to build up our budget. But my first answer would be I don't see any reason to increase it a lot or to decrease it a lot from a business point of view. Of course, not taking into consideration any change of rules. But without that, I don't see any reasons to change it a lot.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Roland Könen from Value-Holdings.
Roland Könen
analystFirst of all, congrats team for your very strong figures. One additional question on the 2024 guidance question. If you look at the IHS figures for next year, and having in mind your strong order intake in the last years which might be materialized in the next year, do you see any chance to outperform the market, also having in mind the development of the raw materials? Maybe you could comment on that figure. Where do you see some tailwinds or where do you see some headwinds? And the second question would be on the factoring. As I saw from the presentation, Page 10, you decreased your factoring volume by EUR 10 million. What is the reason behind that? Is it the interest environment? And what will your policy going forward with the factoring volume?
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThank you for your questions. Yes. So for '24, it's a bit too early to answer in a very accurate manner. But I'm quite confident that, at least, out of Europe, yes, we will beat the market. For Europe, it's difficult because the prediction of futures needs to be a bit more warped and to see the next forecast. But I would say that Europe, at least, we will deliver the market. And out of Europe, especially in China and North America, we should beat the market, and we will beat the market. So optimistic about our business case for Sogefi, then let's see what's going to happen to the automotive world in '24, especially in Europe, where we can have some challenge on the volumes from a market point of view. As you remember, I'm always very cautious on the volumes when I did my budget, so in order to have some good news from a cost point of view and then a profitability point of view. Material. Material, the same. I would say we need to wait to see if there will be any impact on the material cost. The current energy, let's say, increases are a bit too early to say if it's recurring or just some reaction of the market to geopolitical tensions in the world. I don't see irrational or a big increase of material costs next year for steel, I don't see, except if there is a big boom on energy. For plastic, I would say the same. I don't see a big increase in the plastic. The question will be more -- will be -- if there will be a big decrease, I'm not sure either. So my feeling looks like a kind of stability on the prices with the exit point of the current prices of '23. I may be wrong, but it looks like there will be a kind of natural balance on the prices, which will stabilize the prices. I hope I'm wrong. Whatever happens, as you remember, I always manage material prices, first with internal actions and in the same time also with discussions with our customers. So we are building up a few potential scenarios for next year, and we will decide within the next 2 months with which assumption we will be [ targeting ]. For factoring, it was more a business decision. Our free cash flow generation has been as expected for the first 9 months. And in regards to the cost, current cost of factoring, I prefer to limit the cost of factoring -- the usage of factoring currency, which means that if one day, we decide to redo it, I can do it. And then the factor, it will re-improve the free cash flow, one-off. But I prefer to focus on the operational improvement of free cash flow, especially the working capital and the CapEx management and the profitability improvement and use a bit less factoring due to the current cost of the market. But of course, these lines are still here. And if we want to use them by the end of this year or next year, we could do it. I'd like to think it's a way to generate the same cash in a more structural way. It has been my decision this year.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Mr. Sipahi, gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at this time.
Frédéric Sipahi
executiveThank you very much for your attendance and your questions. See you very soon, and thank you again. Bye-bye. Have a nice end of the day. Thank you. Bye.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sogefi S.p.A. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Sogefi S.p.A. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.