South32 Limited (S32) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 16, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Chen Jiang
analystGood afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Chen Jiang. And I work in the Australian metals and mining research team at Bank of America in Sydney, Australia. I am very pleased to introduce our next company, South32. Presenting from South32, we have Graham Kerr, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director. Graham was appointed CEO of South32 in 2014 and led the company through the demerger from BHP in 2015. Prior to this, Graham joined BHP in 1994 and was appointed Chief Financial Officer of BHP in 2011. We will be having a fireside chat with Graham, and we can also take questions from the floor.
Chen Jiang
analystHi, Graham. Our conference team this year is pivot to growth. South32 has been increasing its base metal exposures since the demerger. Can you please talk us through what the portfolio looks like today both in terms of commodities and geographical preference compared with the portfolio you inherited back then? And how do you see this evolving further?
Graham Kerr
executiveThanks, Chen, and, hello, everyone. I guess I'd start by saying, look, South32 has been around now for about 8 years. And the company is very different now compared to when we started. When we started, we obviously had a set of assets that didn't fit the BHP model going forward. Some of those, which we're happy to have, others which are a little bit more probably not for the long-term plans. But to sort of put it in perspective, we probably had about a 50% exposure to the baux, thermal coal, manganese, metallurgical coal and 50% of the base metals, including aluminum. Geographic split of value was probably about 45% Australia and 40% Southern African and a small piece in South America. And probably the other notable point at the time is because of the nature of the demerger, we had no brownfield projects in the group, nor did we have any exploration or greenfield opportunities. Now 8 years into the journey, the portfolio has changed a lot, and that's been triggered by a series of acquisitions, but also divestments. So we're sold South Africa Energy Coal, we sold manganese alloy producer TEMCO in Tasmania. We shut down Metalloys, which is another manganese alloys producer in South Africa. We bought the Arizona Mining Company, which we'll sure we'll talk about later. Sierra Gorda increased our stake in Mozal and also increased, if you like, our ownership in Hermosa bauxite project in South America and Brazil and also with Alcoa restarting the aluminum smelter there. So if you put that into numbers now, we're probably about 75% base metals, including aluminum. If you think about our geographical split, probably in the next 4 or 5 years as we go into execution for Taylor and Clark, which we'll talk about later, I'm sure. We're probably going to have the majority of that value, we'll actually end up in the Americas. Probably the other notable point for us as well would be that this year, we've got very strong production growth. And probably over the next 2 or 3 years, we have a lot of projects sitting there in execution, both from a greenfield perspective, but also a brownfields perspective. So the company is very different from where we started.
Chen Jiang
analystRight. Talking about acquisitions, it has been now more than 12 months since you acquired share of Sierra Gorda copper mine. Can you please tell us a bit how you see that transaction? And are you happy with the performance today from operations?
Graham Kerr
executiveYes. So that's an interesting 1 because I'm sure everyone will go to majority of talks and one-on-ones this week, and what does everyone want more of? Copper. Everyone wants say more of those commodities, it's going to be critical for that decarbonization or energy transformation and copper is right up there. We've been chasing copper pretty much since the inception. We have a number of exploration projects where we're actually pushing copper hard, particularly in Alaska and also in Argentina. But we've always been looking for that entry point to find an operating asset as has most of our competitors. Sierra Gorda was an interesting acquisition for us because probably like a lot of people in the industry, we knew about its challenging commissioning. We knew about its capital overrun during construction. I think what -- the first time the business development team actually brought it to the table to be looked at, the initial response was why you want to touch that, it's had a difficult life. But I guess the more work we did on understanding Sierra Gorda, and there's an advantage in terms of like KGHM, which is the other 55% owner. They're a Polish company, don't really publish a lot. There was not a lot of information about the commissioning and the actual joint venture had been operating. The reality is the team at Sierra Gorda, while they had an initial very difficult commissioning, they had a really good, if you like, piece of work to ramp up the business finally and actually get it going. So having owned this for about a year now, I described it to our Board, originally it was like an onion. We didn't like the look of it, but the more layers we took off, the more we actually saw value opportunities. But we've been very pleased with our partners, a jointly controlled operation, so it takes -- both of us take things forward, and that cooperation has been strong. Safety performance has been great. Production performance has been great. During the process at the moment of delivering a debottlenecking project, which will lift their plant throughput up to about 48 million to 49 million tonnes. By the end of this calendar year, we'll have a look at the fourth grinding line, which will probably make another 15% to 20% jump in processing capacity to about 57 million to 850 million tonnes. And on top of that, we've got some other work to look at around about 110 million tonnes of oxide material on the surface. A new pit called Pampa Lina, where we believe there's a lot of potential that needs a bit more exploration work. So not only do we lock the base business today, we can actually see a path to actually grow the business over time.
Chen Jiang
analystRight. Hermosa, would you please give us an update about Hermosa? And with the U.S. government policies, how the U.S. government policies are impacting your value proposition? You mentioned now a lot of earnings are coming from U.S.
Graham Kerr
executiveYes. So most is certainly, if you like, a big part of our future. The acquisition of Arizona Minerals occurred probably early on in our lifestyle -- life. And what we sort of really targeted, I guess, was looking for something like a Cannington style deposit. So in Australia, we operate Cannington, which has been running for 25-plus years. It's a lead, silver and zinc mine. We're going to use the same mining method for Taylor. We're going to use, if you like, the same processing method and the same customers. So Hermosa itself always had 3 pieces of value. The first one being the Taylor project, which is like Cannington. The Clark deposit, which is a separate deposit that sits across the top, and then a very broad land package. If you sort of look at where are we today with progress, there's been the ups and downs. Certainly, one of the challenges in the early years was there was a lot more water to shift out of the project than we actually expected to access the material at Taylor. And we're in the process at the moment of completing that dewatering, which allows us then to start the shaft work. But on the upside, the resources continue to grow. So Taylor itself, we see a mine life of at least 20-plus years. And we believe that mine life will continue to grow with multiple decades to be added as the deposits still open at depth and laterally in a number of directions. The actual work at the moment is we're up to about the feasibility stage study. We were planning to bring that to the market probably about almost this year to actually talk about a final investment decision. At the same time, in the background, the Clark, which is a manganese oxide deposit, there's been a lot of work done on that to grow that over time. Where we've actually landed with Clark is actually really exciting. So Clark, we see as being the only domestic manganese supplier in the U.S., which has the potential to sort of fill that gap that's driven a little bit by the IRA legislation, which we'll talk about later in the U.S. But importantly, driven by the switch, if you like, in the manganese content in batteries, where if you look at an NCM622 today, you probably use about 60% manganese. The new battery technology, you're talking about 60% manganese. And Clark would allow us to produce HPMSM product, which we produce about 60,000 tonnes a year, but has a mine life of about 60 years. So the development of Taylor and feasibility in Clark further behind actually gave us the opportunity to actually apply to go into the FAST-41 process in the U.S. So for the FAST-41 process, for people who don't know, it is really a process that brings a level of coordination, planning and transformation when you're looking for federal approvals. So we'll be the first mining project that's actually in that FAST-41 process, which got announced the other week. For us, that allows us to continue advance Taylor and Clark. And in particular, we'll look at permitting and how we look at the regulatory piece as 1 project. So that will probably add a couple of months to the actual feasibility for Taylor. So we expect to finish the feasibility by the end of this calendar year. And Clark, we expect to sort of go into the stage of doing decline, getting a bulk sample and continue to actually work on what the final product will look like with the customers. On top of Taylor and Clark, we're got a broader land package. We've got a deposit called Peake, which is predominantly more copper rich. We've put about 11 holes into that. We expect to have another 5 into that over the next 6 to 12 months. And we also expect to start looking for totally new ore body called Flux, which is an exploration project, which is targeting a similar kind of Taylor deposits. So to date, we've been really excited, if you like, by the opportunities that Hermosa presents. It has been supported, if you like, by application of FAST-41, but also the inflation reduction act opens up, if you like, particularly for Clark 2 pools of capital to help actually develop the projects and then put the project into actually commissioning, which we'll look to access over time.
Chen Jiang
analystRight. Talking about the battery raw materials. You mentioned manganese from Clark. What's your view -- are you happy with the commodity mix with South32? Or would you like to add more battery raw materials such as lithium and cobalt into your portfolio?
Graham Kerr
executiveLook, I think if you sort of take a step back, what we would say is it's undisputed that the world is going through that transformation of different commodities that are used to decarbonize and become greener that is going to drive unprecedented demand for things like copper, zinc, lithium, cobalt, et cetera, nickel. We probably -- of those commodities like -- we probably like nickel -- sorry, we probably like zinc and copper the most just based on the supply-demand fundamentals. The existing operations that we think are going to have continuing challenges around grade as they get older. And the fact there's been very little, if you like, exploration in that space. So the primary tool that we do look at are copper and zinc, we like nickel, but obviously, we're watching with interest how Indonesia develops around converting Type 2 to Type 1 nickel or Class 2 to Class 1 nickel. Lithium. Look, I think that will be a commodity that we'd say we probably got wrong 3 years ago. We didn't expect to see the EV penetration rate that we've seen. We'd always like to add lithium to the portfolio, but the reality is the pricing of equities today probably makes it difficult to find a point where we believe we can create value for our shareholders.
Chen Jiang
analystYes. Thanks, Graham. There's a lot of M&A activities in the mining sector. We've seen [indiscernible], BHP acquired OZ. And you've been doing M&A acquisition in the last few years. Where does South32 sit with M&A now? And how we expect to say and can further investment in South32?
Graham Kerr
executiveSo 3 decades of working, I guess, in the industry, I've seen the different cycles of huge M&A, then lots of fuss when no one does, no M&A, and it's all about balance sheet strength. I guess we've come back to the fundamental belief that we already have live leverage to the commodity cycle. Chinese policy, U.S. policy, we don't determine, but it has a huge input on what happens to our prices. So we're very cautious about combining financial and commodity leverage. So from day 1, we've been very proud of having a strong balance sheet. We still believe in having a strong balance sheet. The reason I'm making that point is, as we look at M&A opportunities, like everyone else, we'll always use 2 lenses; one, we won't put our balance sheet at risk; and the second thing is we don't actually look at M&A for growth sake. It's going to be through creating value for our shareholders. So we've got a team that still continues to look at lots of opportunities, but it's always through the lens of never blowing up the balance sheet or making sure that it's something about value, not about ego.
Chen Jiang
analystThanks, Graham. Let's see if we have any questions from the floor, please. There you go, the lady over there.
Unknown Analyst
analystCan you talk to us about Hillside smelter, and what is profitability? Is -- how profitable can it be? And how that gets balanced in society between the conflicting needs of South Africa of job creation and this desperation for power?
Graham Kerr
executiveYes. Look, I think that's a great question. It's something sort of on my mind and the Board a lot as we talk about what do we do with Hillside as we take it forward. For the audience who don't know, we actually have 3 smelters. We have the 1 with Alcoa in Brazil that's in the middle of [indiscernible], which is driven by renewables. We have Mozal in Mozambique, which is also based off hydro, so renewable. And we increased our stake in Mozal with the restart of [indiscernible], we've doubled our green aluminum production. The challenge for us is Hillside, which is the largest smelter in the southern hemisphere, it has been a smelter despite some depressed aluminum prices has continued to generate strong cash flow through the cycle. Despite record load shedding in South Africa at the moment, it continues to operate at it's technical capacity. And the team there do an amazing job. But it's more than just an operation. For us, as you rightly point out, it's an important part of South Africa's economy. We employ directly, indirectly, there are about 30,000 jobs. We sell roughly 30% of the product domestic [indiscernible], which creates a series of other jobs in a part of the country that's really struggling. We're the largest paying customer for Eskom on the power grid today. We also provide the ability to start, back up the network if it falls over almost like a reverse battery. And the way they actually loadshed at the moment is to talk to our people on a daily basis about when and how they will actually give us how much power to the smelter. So on that, we think very carefully about the future of Hillside. We have a current power block at the moment that runs to 2031. We have publicly stated that, look, we will not run another power block that isn't green. So we're working closely with Eskom, the ANC and other stakeholders in South Africa how we can ultimately move Hillside to more renewable power. Short term, there's some opportunity to leverage the nuclear. But longer term, the 1 thing South Africa is not short of is wind, solar and other forms of renewables. But certainly, our objective is to run a green smelter beyond 2031 because the reality is, for South Africa, for the people we employ, I don't believe a brown power-fed smelter will be competitive in the future.
Chen Jiang
analystThanks, Graham. Any questions? Jason?
Unknown Analyst
analystSo Graham, you took -- so you became CEO back in 2014. How has your vision for the company changed over those 8 years? And what surprised you along the way?
Graham Kerr
executiveI think like everyone, when you start something, you always like to go faster than you sort of have. So the 3 things that we spoke about very early, our Chairman, David Crawford was about changing the portfolio composition in terms of particularly getting away from thermal coal, where we see a bright future for us, and then sort of adding more base metals to the portfolio. So the portfolio transformation is important. The cultural transformation was important, not because BHP is a bad company, they're actually a great company, but we just needed a different culture to sort of survive to be more nimble, more entrepreneurial. And the third thing we're looking for was a transformation in safety, particularly in our performance in Southern Africa. I think the portfolio felt like it was going relatively slowly for the first 5 years, but over the last 18 to 24 months, all the stuff we've been working on, all sort of dropped and worked out. So I think that was a positive on the portfolio transformation. The cultural transformation, you'd always like to go faster, but I think the move away from BHP and taking pride in our own values and our purpose is strong in our people. It's probably the safety where we still have a challenge around our performance in Southern Africa, and we've got a strong focus at the moment on how we actually transform that part of our business, which isn't easy and continues to be a challenge, but absolutely on my mind and the Board's mind about how we make that transformation.
Chen Jiang
analystThanks. Graham, you mentioned a couple of times, South32 divested thermal coal from South Africa a few years ago. But you are still owner of Met coal [ Illawarra ] mine. A lot of diversified miners are existing coal operations. What's South32's plan? Are you happy to continue to own and operate asset?
Graham Kerr
executiveMaybe if we take, first of all, the divestment of South Africa Energy Coal as an example. That was a thermal coal business for us. We do believe that for thermal coal today, there are replacements in the form solar and wind. It doesn't mean the developing world would not need thermal coal for a period of time. But the reality is our business in South Africa, half of the product was sold, if you like, to Eskom on cost-plus contracts, and it's not really a business for us. But what we wanted to do was sell that business to a black-owned power group in South Africa. And that's been in place now for a number of years. And so ready, who bought it has continued to grow, and they're actually investing a lot of their proceeds from the thermal coal price boom into actually renewables now such as wind, and I think they've done a great job running that business. Met coal, we see is very different. Where are we today with metallurgical coal. We have 1 Met coal mine, or 1 complex Illawarra mine up at Dendrobium and Appin. We do believe today, metallurgical coal is needed to actually produce steel. There isn't a viable commercial replacement. Green steel will come, but it's not here yet. So from our perspective, we're happy to hold that metallurgical coal business. We're not planning to grow it or add new metallurgic coal to the portfolio, and we're very focused on responsibly running it to the end of its life. So if you think about Dendrobium, it has a mine life somewhere around 2032 at the moment, and Appin goes out to about 2037, maybe 2039. So that gives you probably the double decade, if you like, by the time which you'd expect to see green steel come more into demand.
Chen Jiang
analystRight. So you won't put any CapEx into the Met coal asset? You're going to run it until the end of its life?
Graham Kerr
executiveWe put CapEx in and around things like sustainable CapEx to make sure it's safe. We're doing [indiscernible] [ 7 and 8 ] it happen at the moment. And we'll make sure our people will look at productivity gains, we won't put large capital in to grow the business.
Chen Jiang
analystI understand. Do you have any preference for jurisdictions or any countries you would like to avoid?
Graham Kerr
executiveYes. Look, I think, for the world, it's becoming more and more challenging about where you operate because there is going to be a large shortage of some of those critical minerals such as copper, zinc, et cetera, and that is forcing people to look at new opportunities. I think the question is, how do you do that in a balanced way. So historically, we've operated assets in Colombia, Mozambique, South Africa, not the hardest of locations, but also not the easiest of locations. And I think our teams have done a good job there. If you look at going forward, we're making large investments into safe jurisdictions such as Arizona, doing large exploration in Alaska at the moment, but we've also got 3 interests in projects in Argentina. That's a bit more of a challenging jurisdiction, but I think, over time, it has the opportunity to grow, and that's reflected by the other people that are now there like Barrick, BHP, et cetera. You have Rio. You're seeing far more people have a look at Argentina. And I think people will continue to look at opportunities where they can actually sort of find those commodities. The opportunity in places like that is you can actually really make a difference in people's lives as well, which is the other reason we love those jurisdictions.
Chen Jiang
analystYes. Thanks, Graham. We have time for 1 more question from the floor. It goes to gentleman over there.
Unknown Analyst
analystI had a question on Sierra Gorda. Your partner in Sierra Gorda is a slightly unusual based from a mining industry perspective. Obviously, their executive team gets a slightly different mandate from the one you've got. It seems that their CapEx priorities going forward are much more Polish based and much less internationally based. Does that present the risk of friction going forward, if you see Sierra Gorda as a growth asset and want to put growth CapEx in, and they don't want to do that, but they also don't want to see it controlled?
Graham Kerr
executiveYes. I mean the first thing I'd make is while they own 55%, and we own 45%, every decision is joint controlled and there's both parties to agree. So the reality is you do have to find a way to work together. To date, there hasn't been any conflict on that. And while they do have some government obviously, direction and ownership, that hasn't come into play to date. When we talk about debottlenecking, force grinding line, doing more work on exploration and ramp [indiscernible], KGHM has been really supportive of that to date, but I guess we'll actually test that when it comes time to fund those. But to date, there's been no noise. I think one of the things that really surprised us about Sierra Gorda when we first did our DD was the joint venture itself was an independent joint venture, which is made up of some great people from places like [indiscernible] Codelco, and if I guess, there've been the industry for 20 years. So I think the operational team is fantastic. I think obviously, the 2 owners to date have worked really closely together. We have similar ambitions about growing the business. I met with some of their senior people last week, and they are all's very focused on how we could accelerate the growth. But look, to your point, when you have a large government interest, funding and priorities might shift over time. We've always publicly said what's the one thing we'd like. If we could buy out their interest of the same terms we bought in, we'd love that. To date, they've been very clear they like the asset, they love where it's going, and they see it as their jewel on the crown, if you like.
Chen Jiang
analystAll right. Thank you. Let's join me to thank Graham for his presentation. Thank you, Graham.
Graham Kerr
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete South32 Limited transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to South32 Limited earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.